|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1350
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 18:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
There is alot of talk about double bubble dictors... why not just upgrade the launcher to have two bubbles per reload? Or some mechanism that effectively tturns two launchers into one...
That might be a better solution then designing the ship to fit two There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1350
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 18:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
TrouserDeagle wrote:MeBiatch wrote:There is alot of talk about double bubble dictors... why not just upgrade the launcher to have two bubbles per reload? Or some mechanism that effectively tturns two launchers into one...
That might be a better solution then designing the ship to fit two Or better yet, make it impossible to fit 2, and not change anything else.
That would **** off a lot of people. .. I like it There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1350
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 04:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:I believe the actual interdictor sphere launcher needs a revamp. Sure years ago it worked for the scale of the game, but thankfully the game has grown since then, specifically fleet battles.
I propose you limit the sphere launcher to only one fit at a time. Change the rate of fire to 3-5 seconds. Remove the bonus to the sphere launcher rate of fire and make it +1 to amount of bubbles in the launcher clip with a base amount of 0. At level 1 interdictor you can carry one bubble in the launcher and at max skill, level 5, you can have 5 loaded. Now have the reload time decently long.
With this you have a launcher that fullfills the needs of today's fleets and allows fitting room for a more logical tank so the pilot can be more than a 15 second hero. Also when the launcher is reloading, the pilot can bail off the battlefield or stay and perform some other duties like anti-tackle role without being gimped due to 2-3 launchers and a cloak.
a much more thought out version of my previous post plus one like There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1436
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 14:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Good changes fozz!!! There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1437
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 16:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:No shout out?... 
technically i was first
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3740749#post3740749
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1442
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 22:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:The Roden changes make me very interested in what we can expect for the Lachesis.
That aside, this version of the dictor revamp is much more promising than the 1st draft. Bubble buffs and decent T2 resists go a long way towards fixing this class.
I would presume the missile rate of fire bonus would be switched for an optimal range bonus.
I would drop a high slot for a low and increase to 4 turrets.
Then change the damage bonus with rate of fire.
Maybe add more base armor hp and give it full tech ii resists There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1443
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 04:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Leto Atal wrote:No way should the Sabre have such a low agility compared with the others.
Why does the Heretic have a bonus to armour resistances? All the others have bonuses to weapon systems. I've always wondered about the reasons behind giving some ships extra tank and others yet another weapon bonus.
I'd like to see more equality on bonuses for ships in the same class. Resistances aren't the only bonuses that can be applied to improve defensive capability. What about x% reduction in signature radius per level for Minmatar ships for example? It's called... V A R I A T I O N A N D F L A V O R. marlona, why r u such a c**t to people? the guy was just asking why only 1 of the 4 recieved resist bonuses and why the sabres less agile than the eris. I understand increased survivability but its like the heretics been trialed out in an artificial 'fleet interdictor' role with the resist bonus, before a shield version is considered. As for the eris vs sabre, its been staple racial characteristics that minmatar are agile and can kite better, where as gallente have high straight line speed but poor agility. its why people are confused by the low agility of the sabre. I'd say the sabre should have a 6 sec align time with max velocity of say 300m/sec and the eris say 325m/sec and 7sec align time.
afaik you got that backwards gal are agile min are faster.
There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |
|
|
|