EVE Search - "Only 1000 items can now be stored in a single location"

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

"Only 1000 items can now be stored in a single location"

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Amthrianius	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:13:00 - [1] So, what if i have 1200 items stacked in a station container now. When it patches will it remove 200 stacks of my items? Or will it stay as 1200 stacks and you cant add anymore? Just wanna know if i have to travel around eve putting all my stuff in different containers [where i have more than 1000 stacks] before they get deleted? :/ ---------------
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:17:00 - [2] Originally by: Amthrianius So, what if i have 1200 items stacked in a station container now. When it patches will it remove 200 stacks of my items? Or will it stay as 1200 stacks and you cant add anymore? Just wanna know if i have to travel around eve putting all my stuff in different containers [where i have more than 1000 stacks] before they get deleted? :/ when an item is STACKED it is considered ONE item... in laymens terms a stack of 1200 anything is ONE item... now if you break those items into individual stacks of two, you would have 600 items...or 1200, if each item is an icon all in itself Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Amthrianius	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:19:00 - [3] Thanks for pointing out the obvious, like i said i have 1200 stacks of DIFFERENT items in a single location. Not 1200 items of the same type in a single stack. ---------------
Pooka's Share	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:20:00 - [4] Is this a new feature?
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:20:00 - [5] 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:27:00 - [6] Originally by: Amthrianius Thanks for pointing out the obvious, like i said i have 1200 stacks of DIFFERENT items in a single location. Not 1200 items of the same type in a single stack. sorry for pointing out the obvious....maybe you could sell some of those 1200 individual what evers and help us clear up some lag..or reprocess them maybe??? maybe use a few more containers??? like 1000 containers with 1000 items in each??? this for sure is CCP's attempt to clean up pack rats who save everything under the sun Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Active1313	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:27:00 - [7] Originally by: Pooka's Share Is this a new feature? It's in the new Dev blog as an upcoming include in the Blood Patch

Oveur	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:32:00 - [8] Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Senior Producer EVE Online

StarLite	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [9] Edited by: StarLite on 10/02/2006 18:38:40 Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( ___________________________________________________
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [10] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. can you up the amount of corp hangars to 10 or 12 instead then? Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Sarmaul 4tw.
Bagdh Dearg	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [11] Well if you consider you could have as many as a million seperate items I dont see how you're really gonna be stuck for space. 1000 Station Containers * 1000 Items each. I mean it'll be abit of a hassle but not a major one unless you are having to mess with more then even 5000 seperate item stacks. _______________________________________________ An tT nach bhfuil lßidir nf folßir d= bheith glic -He who is not strong must be crafty
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [12] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Ah, I just read the dev blog--each CONTAINER can also have 1000 too. Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
Bagdh Dearg	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:39:00 - [13] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers Hehe its mentioned in the Blog itself that its being implemented. _______________________________________________ An tT nach bhfuil lßidir nf folßir d= bheith glic -He who is not strong must be crafty
Jenny Spitfire	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:45:00 - [14] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Hey, isnt this one of my lag experience from the sticky? I think... ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT! RAWRRRRRRR!!1 - Imaran Wrangler, stealing Eris pink since a few days ago. We always knew you had a thing for pink - Vanamonde
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:47:00 - [15] Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 10/02/2006 18:39:46 Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Ah, I just read the dev blog--each CONTAINER can also have 1000 too. Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers /signs for posterity Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Quanteeri	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:04:00 - [16] Originally by: Bagdh Dearg Well if you consider you could have as many as a million seperate items I dont see how you're really gonna be stuck for space. 1000 Station Containers * 1000 Items each. I mean it'll be abit of a hassle but not a major one unless you are having to mess with more then even 5000 seperate item stacks. A million separate items? You are doing enitirely too much pack ratting.
Somatic Neuron	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:09:00 - [17] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers First part is in....the Station Container BPO/BPC for 0.0 stations is a MUST, though. If you are limiting us to 1000 items, and not giving us the ability to store those items in Station containers, then you will effectively limit the usefulness of 0.0 stations ----------
Gothikia	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:09:00 - [18] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. OMG YOUR TERRIBLE... i like mess
Skogen Gump	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:15:00 - [19] The thing that concerns me about this, I'm currently living in a station that hates me from a standings point of view. It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this, especially for those of us in 0.0 who don't always have the luxury of picking a station ?
Quanteeri	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:19:00 - [20] Originally by: Skogen Gump The thing that concerns me about this, I'm currently living in a station that hates me from a standings point of view. It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this, especially for those of us in 0.0 who don't always have the luxury of picking a station ? Can't really say that would be very fair. You always have the luxury of picking a station.
Gonada	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:24:00 - [21] It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this ----------------------------------------------- connections, diplomacy, and a few other social skill skills, check em out. -I don't necessarily agree with everything I say.-
Harisdrop	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:29:00 - [22] say good bye to Book mark copying. Now we know why they are not working well. Does 1000 items in you people and places folders means no more +1001 book marks no more copying? -------------------------- I have big balls of Plasma coming out of my guns.
Skogen Gump	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:31:00 - [23] Originally by: Gonada connections, diplomacy, and a few other social skill skills, check em out. groan please Angels have me at -9.7 currently, Serpentis isn't much better. Those skills help nothing at that level. You don't always have the luxury when you're slap bang in the middle of 0.0 and there are no stations that like you within 40 jumps. Anyway, I'm not just suggesting this as a thing for 0.0 players only - how would the system know ?
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:31:00 - [24] Originally by: Harisdrop say good bye to Book mark copying. Now we know why they are not working well. Sets of BMs are generally fewer than 1000... -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
The Enslaver	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:40:00 - [25] Problem: Conquerable stations/outposts don't have these containers; thus limiting people to low amounts of items in those stations. -------- Shinra Director
Xascor	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:43:00 - [26] I'd like to see either an option to refine items from inside a container or when you do a Select All, right click then Reprocess the system ignores containers. Make it so you have to individually select containers and ships (or a stack of them) to reprocess them. Otherwise, I doubt the 1000 item limit will be much of a hassle other than the extra containers some players will need to use. Oh yeah...Thanks for the option to turn off the autolock! - - - This signature is immune to mod modifications! H4X!!!!1111oneone -Kaemonn Still working on You really should change the code to something else than 1234 - Wrangler
Gunstar Zero	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:00:00 - [27] /me thinks back to the 'clean up britannia' campaigns.
Uther Doull	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:05:00 - [28] Originally by: Dark Shikari give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers yeas please, we really really really need station containers in 0.0
ElCoCo	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:06:00 - [29] Does this limitation also apply to corp hangars or just personal ones?
flummox	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:37:00 - [30] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers YES !! if the very least, the asset search, please 8) ... bring me my cheese...

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.