EVE Search - "Only 1000 items can now be stored in a single location"

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

"Only 1000 items can now be stored in a single location"

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Amthrianius	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:13:00 - [1] So, what if i have 1200 items stacked in a station container now. When it patches will it remove 200 stacks of my items? Or will it stay as 1200 stacks and you cant add anymore? Just wanna know if i have to travel around eve putting all my stuff in different containers [where i have more than 1000 stacks] before they get deleted? :/ ---------------
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:17:00 - [2] Originally by: Amthrianius So, what if i have 1200 items stacked in a station container now. When it patches will it remove 200 stacks of my items? Or will it stay as 1200 stacks and you cant add anymore? Just wanna know if i have to travel around eve putting all my stuff in different containers [where i have more than 1000 stacks] before they get deleted? :/ when an item is STACKED it is considered ONE item... in laymens terms a stack of 1200 anything is ONE item... now if you break those items into individual stacks of two, you would have 600 items...or 1200, if each item is an icon all in itself Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Amthrianius	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:19:00 - [3] Thanks for pointing out the obvious, like i said i have 1200 stacks of DIFFERENT items in a single location. Not 1200 items of the same type in a single stack. ---------------
Pooka's Share	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:20:00 - [4] Is this a new feature?
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:20:00 - [5] 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:27:00 - [6] Originally by: Amthrianius Thanks for pointing out the obvious, like i said i have 1200 stacks of DIFFERENT items in a single location. Not 1200 items of the same type in a single stack. sorry for pointing out the obvious....maybe you could sell some of those 1200 individual what evers and help us clear up some lag..or reprocess them maybe??? maybe use a few more containers??? like 1000 containers with 1000 items in each??? this for sure is CCP's attempt to clean up pack rats who save everything under the sun Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Active1313	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:27:00 - [7] Originally by: Pooka's Share Is this a new feature? It's in the new Dev blog as an upcoming include in the Blood Patch

Oveur	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:32:00 - [8] Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Senior Producer EVE Online

StarLite	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [9] Edited by: StarLite on 10/02/2006 18:38:40 Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( ___________________________________________________
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [10] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. can you up the amount of corp hangars to 10 or 12 instead then? Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Sarmaul 4tw.
Bagdh Dearg	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [11] Well if you consider you could have as many as a million seperate items I dont see how you're really gonna be stuck for space. 1000 Station Containers * 1000 Items each. I mean it'll be abit of a hassle but not a major one unless you are having to mess with more then even 5000 seperate item stacks. _______________________________________________ An tT nach bhfuil lßidir nf folßir d= bheith glic -He who is not strong must be crafty
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:38:00 - [12] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Ah, I just read the dev blog--each CONTAINER can also have 1000 too. Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
Bagdh Dearg	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:39:00 - [13] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers Hehe its mentioned in the Blog itself that its being implemented. _______________________________________________ An tT nach bhfuil lßidir nf folßir d= bheith glic -He who is not strong must be crafty
Jenny Spitfire	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:45:00 - [14] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Hey, isnt this one of my lag experience from the sticky? I think... ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT! RAWRRRRRRR!!1 - Imaran Wrangler, stealing Eris pink since a few days ago. We always knew you had a thing for pink - Vanamonde
BlackHole Bob	Posted - 2006.02.10 18:47:00 - [15] Originally by: Dark Shikari Edited by: Dark Shikari on 10/02/2006 18:39:46 Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Ah, I just read the dev blog--each CONTAINER can also have 1000 too. Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers /signs for posterity Blackhole Bob www.evegathering.com Las Vegas EvE Gathering 2006 March 15th and 16th
Quanteeri	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:04:00 - [16] Originally by: Bagdh Dearg Well if you consider you could have as many as a million seperate items I dont see how you're really gonna be stuck for space. 1000 Station Containers * 1000 Items each. I mean it'll be abit of a hassle but not a major one unless you are having to mess with more then even 5000 seperate item stacks. A million separate items? You are doing enitirely too much pack ratting.
Somatic Neuron	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:09:00 - [17] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers First part is in....the Station Container BPO/BPC for 0.0 stations is a MUST, though. If you are limiting us to 1000 items, and not giving us the ability to store those items in Station containers, then you will effectively limit the usefulness of 0.0 stations ----------
Gothikia	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:09:00 - [18] Originally by: Oveur Originally by: Dark Shikari 1000 is a very low limit... a week's worth of loot and a few hundred BPOs/BPCs could easily go over that limit. IMO its a bit too low--even 5000 will stop people from doing things like making 10 million one run BPCs of a tech 1 item. A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. OMG YOUR TERRIBLE... i like mess
Skogen Gump	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:15:00 - [19] The thing that concerns me about this, I'm currently living in a station that hates me from a standings point of view. It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this, especially for those of us in 0.0 who don't always have the luxury of picking a station ?
Quanteeri	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:19:00 - [20] Originally by: Skogen Gump The thing that concerns me about this, I'm currently living in a station that hates me from a standings point of view. It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this, especially for those of us in 0.0 who don't always have the luxury of picking a station ? Can't really say that would be very fair. You always have the luxury of picking a station.
Gonada	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:24:00 - [21] It basically means that to refine my loot I have to take really bad taxation. Will there be something to combat this ----------------------------------------------- connections, diplomacy, and a few other social skill skills, check em out. -I don't necessarily agree with everything I say.-
Harisdrop	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:29:00 - [22] say good bye to Book mark copying. Now we know why they are not working well. Does 1000 items in you people and places folders means no more +1001 book marks no more copying? -------------------------- I have big balls of Plasma coming out of my guns.
Skogen Gump	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:31:00 - [23] Originally by: Gonada connections, diplomacy, and a few other social skill skills, check em out. groan please Angels have me at -9.7 currently, Serpentis isn't much better. Those skills help nothing at that level. You don't always have the luxury when you're slap bang in the middle of 0.0 and there are no stations that like you within 40 jumps. Anyway, I'm not just suggesting this as a thing for 0.0 players only - how would the system know ?
Dark Shikari	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:31:00 - [24] Originally by: Harisdrop say good bye to Book mark copying. Now we know why they are not working well. Sets of BMs are generally fewer than 1000... -- Proud member of the [23]. The Tachikomas are DEAD! Click sig for video. <3 Tachikomas -Eldo But I'm the cutest of them all, and I'm not even a blue robot - Wrangler I have seen you. You cannot deny it anymore - Vanamonde You used to be one of the twenty three, now you are a part of me - Cortes Immy > You All - Imaran Tachikomas > All ~kieron
The Enslaver	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:40:00 - [25] Problem: Conquerable stations/outposts don't have these containers; thus limiting people to low amounts of items in those stations. -------- Shinra Director
Xascor	Posted - 2006.02.10 19:43:00 - [26] I'd like to see either an option to refine items from inside a container or when you do a Select All, right click then Reprocess the system ignores containers. Make it so you have to individually select containers and ships (or a stack of them) to reprocess them. Otherwise, I doubt the 1000 item limit will be much of a hassle other than the extra containers some players will need to use. Oh yeah...Thanks for the option to turn off the autolock! - - - This signature is immune to mod modifications! H4X!!!!1111oneone -Kaemonn Still working on You really should change the code to something else than 1234 - Wrangler
Gunstar Zero	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:00:00 - [27] /me thinks back to the 'clean up britannia' campaigns.
Uther Doull	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:05:00 - [28] Originally by: Dark Shikari give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers yeas please, we really really really need station containers in 0.0
ElCoCo	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:06:00 - [29] Does this limitation also apply to corp hangars or just personal ones?
flummox	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:37:00 - [30] Originally by: Dark Shikari Now here's my request. Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers, give us station container BPOs for 0.0 player-owned stations, and let Asset Search search in containers YES !! if the very least, the asset search, please 8) ... bring me my cheese...
Snake Jankins	Posted - 2006.02.10 20:39:00 - [31] Edited by: Snake Jankins on 10/02/2006 20:42:36 Edited by: Snake Jankins on 10/02/2006 20:39:31 Hmm, station container BPOs make sense. I'd like to have BPOs for standard containers, too. (The ones that are not anchorable). Or just implement a switch to turn off the locking/logging stuff of the station containers. I see no use in these features, when I'm the only one, who has access to a station container. For me locking/unlock is just a waste of time and probably also a waste of performance. Ok, maybe that's already in the patch notes. Don't know. Hope that the limits work without problems for ALL situations like direct player trade, stuff from escrow (bought/returned), repackaging ships, containers and escrow packages, build stuff and blueprints when 'delivering' a job etc., mission rewards, BPO lottery wins and all that. Not that something gets lost due to the limit and then it's petition time. edit: Ok, guess in that case the limit is just ignored and the item not trashed. ___________ 'Only ships can be assembled, this is a Frigate.'
SHINJI AKARI	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:01:00 - [32] "Stack All" 4TW! imo
Lyah Moonshade	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:09:00 - [33] IMO you'd be much better off cleaning the servers up if you simply made a limited durability on anchored containers. This could be based on the anchoring skill (1 = 2h, 2 = 5h, 3 = 10h, 4 = 2 days, 5 = 1 week).
Maya Rkell	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:13:00 - [34] Search inside containers, slash container prices, auto-repackage. There's no need to have unpacked, undamaged items at all. Plus stacking identical BPO's. These items seem to be...missing...from the notes. Because you'd not do a half-arsed implimentation of a system which badly nerfed quite a few players, would you? Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command
Emily Spankratchet	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:15:00 - [35] Originally by: StarLite Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( I end up keeping a lot of commonly used stuff outside containers because I can't search for it. If they force me to stick stuff in boxes and then stop me searching for it I'm going to go mad. I've got stuff being sold in stations all over the place, caches of modules and ammo, all sorts of cruft hanging around around the galaxy. If you're going to do this, please let us search inside containers.
Maya Rkell	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:23:00 - [36] Okay, apparently searching cans is sometime Soon (TM). Thus I think that this is a simply terrible idea. Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command
branodn lee	Posted - 2006.02.10 21:31:00 - [37] well i have to agre i dont like this deal with only 1000 items per hanger. its just like saying takeing away the up to 15drones per ship was ment to help the server but yet the server got worse after that lol.
Kage Getsu	Posted - 2006.02.10 23:55:00 - [38] Can't say I've ever had more than 300 seperate items in one place. Or in total. _________________________________________________________
MaxPower	Posted - 2006.02.11 00:21:00 - [39] This is stupid. Just kick off the trial accounts. Dont take lag problems or server load out on paying customers. I pay my 15 euros a month and i like a messy hanger. My mum makes me clean my room or she beats me with a stick. Please dont force me to keep eve tidy too Me like PIE!!!1 -Capsicum Pie ist gut ja? - Imaran
sidthesexist	Posted - 2006.02.11 01:26:00 - [40] If this is going to be done atleast let all NPC/0,0 stations/outposts have station containers on the market in them! ________ Shinra Originally by: Sidthesexist I love you Tomb Originally by: TomB Love you as well sexy.
Kaathar Rielspar	Posted - 2006.02.11 01:40:00 - [41] but i LIKE a messy hangar where i can see everything (currently 1219 stacks), all at once. If i'm fitting a ship i'll scroll up the list a bit, stick the module on, scroll down a bit, fit that gun, etc... What about giving us 'divisions' in our personal hangars? (just like the corp ones that can be renamed) That would get around the problems of people with large stacks of items where station containers aren't available. Overall, i'm dont like this change one bit My hangar doesn't lag at all when the station environment is loaded. Perhaps make it 2000 instead of 1000 if this is a 'must do' move.
Dakath	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:16:00 - [42] Originally by: Oveur A 5000 tiem limit wouldn't have made any difference from a server standpoint, therefore not worth to do in the first place, therefore now improvement in server performance. Your current locations with more items wont change, you just won't be able to add to them. This is also done to directly encourage cleaning up of your hangars, it will make baby EVE very happy. Oveur. With all due respect: You nerfed the highways (Yulai) to reduce lag. Lag increased. You nerfed drones to reduce lag, lag increased. Now you will nerf hangers, to reduce lag. The record shows that lag will increase. Perhaps nerfs are not the answer to lag? So far, they have only increased lag. I, for one, welcome our new Jovian Overlords!
Cvuos	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:29:00 - [43] Originally by: Dark Shikari Ah, I just read the dev blog [snip] Give us the option to not auto-lock items in station containers You "skimmed" dev blog, didn't read. Originally by: Devblog As a further improvement, you can also disable the automatic locking of items which you put inside secure and station containers. Originally by: Dakath Oveur. With all due respect: You nerfed the highways (Yulai) to reduce lag. Lag increased. You nerfed drones to reduce lag, lag increased. Now you will nerf hangers, to reduce lag. The record shows that lag will increase. Perhaps nerfs are not the answer to lag? So far, they have only increased lag. What else happened during this course of events? Something with numbers...perhaps related to userbase...
Dakath	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:34:00 - [44] Originally by: Cvuos What else happened during this course of events? Something with numbers...perhaps related to userbase... That is not the paying customer's problem, that is CCP's problem. The paying customer's problem is the constant nerfs of good things. I, for one, welcome our new Jovian Overlords!
Cvuos	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:40:00 - [45] Originally by: Dakath That is not the paying customer's problem, that is CCP's problem. The paying customer's problem is the constant nerfs of good things. The paying customer's problem is CCP's problem. They feed their children by selling accounts, why wouldn't it be? But CCP's problems aren't always so obvious to the me-me-me customers.
Dakath	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:49:00 - [46] Edited by: Dakath on 11/02/2006 03:53:24 Edited for politeness. Originally by: Cvuos The paying customer's problem is CCP's problem. They feed their children by selling accounts, why wouldn't it be? But CCP's problems aren't always so obvious to the me-me-me customers. CCP now has over 100,000 accounts. So much for feeding their Lamorginis. Other games have died from constant nerfs. I, for one, welcome our new Jovian Overlords!
Cvuos	Posted - 2006.02.11 03:59:00 - [47] Edited by: Cvuos on 11/02/2006 04:00:52 Originally by: Dakath CCP now has over 100,000 accounts. So much for feeding their Lamorginis. Other games have died from constant nerfs. Anyway, my original question was to Oveur, not to fanbois. (edited for politeness in return) Not considering how your points aren't real nerfs, including eliminating highways if one looks at the big picture, ignoring the increase in userbase (while perhaps joining in the praise after each record broken) as a factor of lag is a bit inconsiderate, don't you think? They're not being intentionally mean to us, they're trying to fix problems we can't see as easily by just looking at in-game content.
Agent Kenshin	Posted - 2006.02.11 04:41:00 - [48] I definately have to say this is going to hurt things in so many ways. One is on the production side i know that most corps dont have 1000 bpos lying around there hanger but with the combination of having everything in a single hanger to produce from this is gonna hurt. Say you have quite a lof of things in your hanger everyone does realize that when you start to build stuff that when you put something in for so many runs especially t2 it unpackages all those rams and places them and then consumes them. If you have so many items in your corp hanger it is possible to stop that t2 item from being produced at that moment. Another major issue i see here is with teh carriers and other ships with mobile corp hangers. You cant put station containers in those ships. And if they are getting an overhaul how are we supposed to stick stuff inside of them if as far as i know you cant repackage items inside teh carrier.... Constant refitting on a battlefield and dumping of looted modules and everything will eventually hit that 1k limit. Once again yes i know there are 7 corp hangers and you can sort them in different hangers from there as well but there is the remote extreme possiblity that it could happen to fill all divisions. I know its supposed to help improve server lag and everything but we will need some modified options to allow us to search our cans and everything. Otherwise we will need to spend hours flying around the entire galaxy searching cans. Glad to see general freight cans in. Dont know if that makes much sense but there are going to be extreme exceptions that are gonna come up im sure just not exactly sure where all of these will be yet... Originally by: MAXSuicide only carebears call pvpers 'greifers' ehehehh....
Lygos	Posted - 2006.02.11 06:07:00 - [49] POS need repackaging options. While the lack of it serves as a great incentive to work towards Outposts, it's kindof overkill. Eunoia: The persistent suspicion that the universe is secretly conspiring to quietly improve one's life.
Dak Hakin	Posted - 2006.02.11 06:10:00 - [50] I dont have 1000 stacks that I know of... but geez, now this is being limited. Is the next change going to be "ships cause lag, no more than two ships per player"? Or "ammo is causing lag, no more than 100 rounds on your ship at one time". Reducing drones didnt fix any lag problems. I just dont like this constant reduction in things to make room for other things. CCP, you giveth, and you taketh away. /me sighs. _______________________________________________ Proudly serving Electus Matari Mr. Grumpy-sour-pus
Rutoo	Posted - 2006.02.11 11:44:00 - [51] Originally by: StarLite Edited by: StarLite on 10/02/2006 18:38:40 Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( Why not just name the container for whats it it? Or get a better memory because i pretty much know what i have/don't have in my hanger at all times
Misses Gap	Posted - 2006.02.11 12:32:00 - [52] Originally by: Gunstar Zero /me thinks back to the 'clean up britannia' campaigns. Yeah at least we got rewards fot that back then. Is it just me or is Eve getting smaller and smaller ? Less Freedom, more static game on rails every patch ? Fewer drones, fewer possessions, no real way to move freely in space, etc..
keepiru	Posted - 2006.02.11 12:35:00 - [53] sort your items out you lazy bums ------------- Please fix the stacking algorythm, it's a disgrace! Consider your house breached and your cAke and bree stolen - Wrangler We have the colours, resistence is futile. Now where did I have those flower signatures -Eris
Trazden Kelmar	Posted - 2006.02.11 16:37:00 - [54] Originally by: MaxPower This is stupid. Just kick off the trial accounts. Dont take lag problems or server load out on paying customers. I pay my 15 euros a month and i like a messy hanger. My mum makes me clean my room or she beats me with a stick. Please dont force me to keep eve tidy too I've seen this argument several times. Trial accounts do not have as large of an affect on server load as you think. I started a trial account about 2 months ago, and subed for a month, but a money crunch hit, so I started a new trial character. Then and now, the number of logged in trial accounts was only 8%-12% of the total logged in players. Sure, they add to server load, and yes, they tend to be in the newbie areas, but removing the buddy/trial program will hurt sales more than help your lag.
Maya Rkell	Posted - 2006.02.11 16:44:00 - [55] Originally by: Rutoo Originally by: StarLite Edited by: StarLite on 10/02/2006 18:38:40 Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( Why not just name the container for whats it it? Or get a better memory because i pretty much know what i have/don't have in my hanger at all times Because if I want a web, i'll search for a web. If the can's "tackling stuff", searching for "web" won't help, and I can't escrow the can to someone. And remembering what you have where ISN'T an option for oh...me. (I have quite a lot of stuff and I'm dyslexic - little details like where I left a web 2 months ago tend to drop through holes in my memory ) Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command
Sicarius	Posted - 2006.02.11 18:48:00 - [56] Edited by: Sicarius on 11/02/2006 18:48:55 wow .. wait a minute o.O you actually have more than 1000 seperate items in your personal hangars O_O..... I've been playing for like 2 years and never gone above 350items in my hangar .. and thats with all my BPO's as well with weeks NPC hunting spree... O.o
hitech redneck	Posted - 2006.02.11 19:29:00 - [57] Originally by: StarLite Edited by: StarLite on 10/02/2006 18:38:40 Any news about SEARCHING your assets INSIDE containers now then, cus it would totally suck if you couldn't :( I agree putting items in containers suck. you can not view the contents in space or another station
MaxPower	Posted - 2006.02.11 19:42:00 - [58] Originally by: Trazden Kelmar Originally by: MaxPower This is stupid. Just kick off the trial accounts. Dont take lag problems or server load out on paying customers. I pay my 15 euros a month and i like a messy hanger. My mum makes me clean my room or she beats me with a stick. Please dont force me to keep eve tidy too I've seen this argument several times. Trial accounts do not have as large of an affect on server load as you think. I started a trial account about 2 months ago, and subed for a month, but a money crunch hit, so I started a new trial character. Then and now, the number of logged in trial accounts was only 8%-12% of the total logged in players. Sure, they add to server load, and yes, they tend to be in the newbie areas, but removing the buddy/trial program will hurt sales more than help your lag. 10% less lag suits me fine. In my opinion its a fair argument. Id rather CCP gave a 1 week free trial, then a half price sub for a month. Me like PIE!!!1 -Capsicum Pie ist gut ja? - Imaran

Pages: 1 2 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.