|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Dehval
Risk Breakers
Fidelas Constans
41
   |
Posted - 2014.01.10 05:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:Well still can't think of a useful purpose for this ship.
It'd be good in the alliance tournament, assuming the rules change/don't change to accommodate it.
Do an armor tinker tank, but replace the Legion with the Nestor. You'll get much more repping power (50% bonused medium reps vs large), larger tank, while providing 450 dps via drones with an exceptional amount of mids for ECCM, etc.. You could even make it your flagship as well with it being a logistics battleship, although the flagship really doesn't add much to drone assist teams. You'd get to use two deadspace reppers though, so that's nice.
Outside of that very structured form of small gang warfare the Nestor looks to be a terrible waste of money that will only be a liability on the battlefield. |
Dehval
Risk Breakers
Fidelas Constans
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 07:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
Savira Terrant wrote:
Haha, I like this idea of adding virus strength remotely. Problem would be that there is no content hard enough to crack really.. or are ghostsites that hard?
Ghost sites themselves are very easy.
It's just the timelimit and the explosion at the end that gives it any sort of difficulty. |
Dehval
Risk Breakers
Fidelas Constans
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 04:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
Uriel Paradisi Anteovnuecci wrote:Arthur Aihaken wrote:Uriel Paradisi Anteovnuecci wrote:I just realized how much the omni changes will help the Nestor- it'll be helpful  You mean it'll have the capacitor to run active omni units now?  Hah, that too... but really, now it'll be easier to compensate for the lack of the domi's tracking/range bonus: we'll be able to adjust accordingly with scripts and make it more versatile and usable (distance or tracking).
You do realize it is a nerf to omni's, right?
Tracking will be slightly higher than before if you script for it (and overheat as well, I guess), but optimal will be much much lower (even after accounting for the additional falloff) when scripted and you don't get the benefit of both like we do now.
(T2)
Now = 25% tracking and 25% optimal
1.1 = 30% tracking OR 15% optimal + 30% falloff. 15/7.5/15 unscripted. |
|
|
| |
|