Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Luci Ambrye
The Service Crew
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Does anyone else think that CCP are completely wrong in making this an exploit and that it should be regarded as a genuine game mechanic?
POS Bumpin
|

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
2174
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Polarized.
1068
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
It shouldn't be possible in the first place but that is CCPs problem. +1 |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2122
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
I'd be quite happy to see the elimination of POS bubbles, replacing it with a different mechanic. Such as the ability to anchor a super cap to a structure, locking it down.
That's certainly been suggested by CCP as the way things will be going. AOE effects like POS bubbles make CCP Veritas cry. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Luci Ambrye
The Service Crew
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:55:00 -
[5] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open.
Eyes are wide enough open to know that you sound butthurt as if its already happened to you/your alliance. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1274
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 11:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. I got caught out misreading or failing to pass elementary english and now I need to resort to personal insults to hide my sore epeen
FTFU
High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Keno Skir
Vectis Covert Solutions
467
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. Eyes are wide enough open to know that you sound butthurt as if its already happened to you/your alliance.
Heh. He makes a fair point tho doesn't he, you did misunderstand..
BUDDY TRIALS - 21days + ISK bonus + Starting Assistance : https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=77facad8-d941-45ad-95bc-c1ec90919b6b&action=buddy Feel free to contact me with questions :) |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6683
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's not an exploit to bump a ship out of the pos if you're legitimately able to enter the pos shields. This includes guessing the password or learning it through espionage.
If the shields are supposed to keep you out though, then you shouldn't be able to bump something out of them.
I'm not aware of how this exploit works but I agree with CCP's call here. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

Samillian
Angry Mustellid
371
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:16:00 -
[9] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:Does anyone else think that CCP are completely wrong in making this an exploit and that it should be regarded as a genuine game mechanic? POS Bumpin
No NBSI shall be the whole of the Law |

I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
759
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
I thought they made this an exploit a long time ago? Or was that warping to an enemy POS in a cap ship or titan and bouncing the ships out to kill them? I had assumed that it meant bumping any ships out of a POS was an exploit. |
|

Loki Proteus
Wild Knights
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
I Love Boobies wrote:I thought they made this an exploit a long time ago? Or was that warping to an enemy POS in a cap ship or titan and bouncing the ships out to kill them? I had assumed that it meant bumping any ships out of a POS was an exploit.
This is called POS Bowling and is the reason you land 15km off the shields when you warp to a pos without the password entered nowdays
|

Zol Interbottom
Theft and Taxes
182
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
It's only an exploit if you have to exploit your way trough the shield Stupid forum posts become my MS-Paint art, send me some stupid posts if you see them |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17650
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
I Love Boobies wrote:I thought they made this an exploit a long time ago? Or was that warping to an enemy POS in a cap ship or titan and bouncing the ships out to kill them? I had assumed that it meant bumping any ships out of a POS was an exploit. POS bowling in its various forms has been an exploit for ages. This is probably just a friendly reminder as some party or another has taken it up anew as a hobby. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Slade Trillgon
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1064
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Old 'mechanic' er exploit. ^says it better then I could have^ |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
2177
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 12:36:00 -
[15] - Quote
Yup, it was declared an exploit many years ago. Then the mechanics allowing this were fixed. Apparently someone found a new way around it. But guess what, the ruling still stands. |

Setsune Rin
Collapsed Out Shadow Cartel
108
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 13:15:00 -
[16] - Quote
so some idiot that parks an avatar with its butt sticking out of the shields is off-limits now? |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1277
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 13:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Setsune Rin wrote:so some idiot that parks an avatar with its butt sticking out of the shields is off-limits now?
No High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Rhes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
485
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 13:28:00 -
[18] - Quote
Setsune Rin wrote:so some idiot that parks an avatar with its butt sticking out of the shields is off-limits now? You might want to try actually reading the announcement before making dumb comments about it.
EVE is a game about spaceships and there's an enormous amount of work to do on the in-space gameplay before players (or developers) are ready to sacrifice it for a totally new type of gameplay - CCP Rise |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2338
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 16:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
I'm trying to figure out how you can get into the POS force field without rights. The only two things I can think of are
Go real fast and penetrate in a bit before getting bumped out.
Micro-jump drive. This one I would expect CCP to have covered by game mechanics. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

NEONOVUS
Diabolically Sexy Eureka-Secret Science R Us
533
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 17:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
So who died to cause this ruling?
|
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
5707
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 17:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
NEONOVUS wrote:So who died to cause this ruling?
Don't know who the victim was this time, but it seems CCP logs have improved over the years. They went from "Our logs show nothing" to "Our logs show everything". |

The Spod
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
140
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 18:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:So who died to cause this ruling?
Don't know who the victim was this time, but it seems CCP logs have improved over the years. They went from "Our logs show nothing" to "Our logs show everything".
Actually this would be a pretty good response to every single whine.
"Our logs show everything."
*were you expecting anything to be done about it? |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1198
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 18:25:00 -
[23] - Quote
Sooo, ummm .... why can a small ship bump a large and insanely heavier ship? Yeah.
Also do we need a class to memorize all the exploits due to silly game mechanics? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

seth Hendar
I love you miners
258
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 18:57:00 -
[24] - Quote
that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
316
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 18:59:00 -
[25] - Quote
seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it.
Which part is bullshit, exactly?
As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years.
Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. |

Pedo Thellere
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. What about the announcement could he have possibly misread? They say we can no longer take advantage of idiot cap/supercap pilots who are sitting in a small pos with their asses hanging out in the breeze. How is that an exploit? There are many ways to prevent this such as BUY A BIGGER POS. It really is a bullshit call. |

seth Hendar
I love you miners
258
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:09:00 -
[27] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. Which part is bullshit, exactly? As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years. Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. two reasons:
calling this an exploit, it as been used for so long, it's one of the only way to actually kill a titan (wich CCP already aknowledge hey don't die often enought), and protecting someone for being dumb, wich go against the moto of eve, where being dumb lead to consequences.
the recent events, it's almost like CCP is claiming that killing a titan is an exploit....seriously this is bad.
at lerast we are now sure CCP doesn't give a F*** about emergent / clever gameplay, despite what they claim.
while i agree the bumping mechanic need to be adressed for the titan (the current easyness is ridiculous), this particular "solution" is dumb (to stay polite) |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2338
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Pedo Thellere wrote:Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. What about the announcement could he have possibly misread? They say we can no longer take advantage of idiot cap/supercap pilots who are sitting in a small pos with their asses hanging out in the breeze. How is that an exploit? There are many ways to prevent this such as BUY A BIGGER POS. It really is a bullshit call. It sounds to me like CCP needs to define when a ship is in a POS force field. I see two definitions:
1) When all parts of its collision bubble are in the force field
2) When it is sufficiently far in the force field that it cannot be targeted or boarded. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
316
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:16:00 -
[29] - Quote
seth Hendar wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. Which part is bullshit, exactly? As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years. Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. two reasons: calling this an exploit, it as been used for so long, )
What in the actual **** are you on about?
POS bowling has always been an exploit. Nothing changed here. CCP didn't alter the rules. This isn't new. It was a reminder for imbeciles who forgot. |

Pedo Thellere
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. Which part is bullshit, exactly? As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years. Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
|
|

seth Hendar
I love you miners
258
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 19:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. Which part is bullshit, exactly? As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years. Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. two reasons: calling this an exploit, it as been used for so long, ) What in the actual **** are you on about? POS bowling has always been an exploit. Nothing changed here. CCP didn't alter the rules. This isn't new. It was a reminder for imbeciles who forgot. pos bowling was about using a titan to bump out ships FULLY and often DEEP within the POS shield.
often done with a titan, using titan's momentum when landing on grid.
this was adressed long time ago by "hardening" the pos shield
here we are talking about bumping a ship wich is not fully inside the shield, like it is the case when you try to park a titan in a small pos.
absolutely not the same
while POS bowling was called exploit, then fixed long time ago, the issue mentionned on this devblog was knwon but up to this day, was NOT called exploit |

SurrenderMonkey
Space Llama Industries
319
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 20:07:00 -
[32] - Quote
seth Hendar wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:SurrenderMonkey wrote:seth Hendar wrote:that's bullshit, which CCP ppl is coming from a big alliance, pretty sure a titan of said alliance died this way not long ago......
clearly, CCP, stop that ****, after that you will also say it's an exploit to bump? then to undock?
stop dumbing eve down, if one is dumb enought to park a titan in a small, with it's bare ass sticking out, he deserve to loose it. Which part is bullshit, exactly? As others have noted, this isn't a new exploit. It's been known and regarded as an exploit for years. Whatever prompted the reminder, hopefully they doled out some punishment with it. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. two reasons: calling this an exploit, it as been used for so long, ) What in the actual **** are you on about? POS bowling has always been an exploit. Nothing changed here. CCP didn't alter the rules. This isn't new. It was a reminder for imbeciles who forgot. pos bowling was about using a titan to bump out ships FULLY and often DEEP within the POS shield. often done with a titan, using titan's momentum when landing on grid. this was adressed long time ago by "hardening" the pos shield here we are talking about bumping a ship wich is not fully inside the shield, like it is the case when you try to park a titan in a small pos. absolutely not the same while POS bowling was called exploit, then fixed long time ago, the issue mentionned on this devblog was knwon but up to this day, was NOT called exploit
No, they're actually very much the same. The problem is that some irresponsible jackasses looked at it and thought to themselves, "Hah! There is an insignificant and largely cosmetic difference between these two activities! We will treat them as if they are completely different things, even though we should obviously know better!"
So, here we are, with those same people whining, and everyone else rolling their eyes at the obvious exploit.  |

Almethea
Trans Stellar Express
23
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 20:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
dafuk?! really? in10y, first time the logs show something? WTS capital bpc https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=123248 |

Thead Enco
III Legion
24
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 20:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
So who got "Black Legion'd" |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
664
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 20:38:00 -
[35] - Quote
Confirming "the logs show nothing" regarding a stargate consuming my T3. |

Aaron Kyoto
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
26
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 21:22:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP need to clarify with an example, because 'bumping' is in a different league with 'pos bowling' and they need to explain themselves:
Is bumping a titan partially exposed from the pos now considered an exploit? Or is it in referance to warping a mothership at blank range? |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
319
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 22:49:00 -
[37] - Quote
I seem to recall this has actually been an exploit for some time. I'm curious though what happened that they brought it up again. '
Also, the thing about CCP's logs 'not showing anything' was known bullshit even back in the day. They got caught in the lie about it a while back and have decided to come clean is all.
I am the Walrus. |

Vald Tegor
Empyrean Guard Tactical Narcotics Team
79
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:04:00 -
[38] - Quote
Aaron Kyoto wrote:CCP need to clarify with an example, because 'bumping' is in a different league with 'pos bowling' and they need to explain themselves:
Is bumping a titan partially exposed from the pos now considered an exploit? Or is it in referance to warping a mothership at blank range?
It sounds quite clear to me.
Quote:Bumping ships, that are located within password protected starbase force-fields
with-+in preposition in the compass or limits of; not beyond:
|

Trillian Stargazer
Origin. Black Legion.
11
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:07:00 -
[39] - Quote
this has to be the most pants on the head ******** thing CCP has done this year. punish players for taking advantage of other peoples mistakes. looking forward to the "using drag bubbles to pull people of gates exploit". |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2130
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
Trillian Stargazer wrote:this has to be the most pants on the head ******** thing CCP has done this year. punish players for taking advantage of other peoples mistakes. looking forward to the "using drag bubbles to pull people of gates exploit".
That's not what they're talking about. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6695
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Pedo Thellere wrote:Abdiel Kavash wrote:No. Read the announcement again, this time with eyes open. What about the announcement could he have possibly misread? They say we can no longer take advantage of idiot cap/supercap pilots who are sitting in a small pos with their asses hanging out in the breeze. How is that an exploit? There are many ways to prevent this such as BUY A BIGGER POS. It really is a bullshit call. What are you even on about? They didn't mention anything about parts of ships sticking out of the shield. Unless you can actually provide an example that shows this was the exploit being used your post is just meaningless hysteria. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

S0mveraa
Isotope Laboratories The Laughing Men
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
It's not an "exploit". It fits right in with the very spirit of eve. Corporate theft and espionage. If you take this out, you will have to make joining someone's corp to steal stuff, a ban able offense, or take off POS shield passwords at all. You've made some bad decisions recently CCP....but REALLY. What in the WORLD are you thinking?
Does this effect Titans poking their heads out to bridge a whole fleet? What you mean to tell me is, it's ok for that to happen ..but not for someone to bump them out and murder them? I've got to ask CCP ...who's proverbial phallus are you on right now?
As a wormhole dweller...I have no issues with bumping stuff out of pos's, especially if your security let in a spy to learn pos passwords. It's a part of the game ..take it out ......change some stuff ...or screw off CCP.
EDIT: Oh right ...over the years i've head " our logs show nothing" so many times ..I don't even put in petitions for obvious crap anymore......You just told every player (that's probably most of us) who have seen " our logs show nothing". That YOU WERE FREKING LYING THE WHOLE TIME! Really ..you can see a collision ? WOW that's some detailed logs ...Wonder how they never show anything else... |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2130
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:30:00 -
[43] - Quote
S0mveraa wrote:It's not an "exploit". It fits right in with the very spirit of eve. Corporate theft and espionage. If you take this out, you will have to make joining someone's corp to steal stuff, a ban able offense, or take off POS shield passwords at all. You've made some bad decisions recently CCP....but REALLY. What in the WORLD are you thinking?
Does this effect Titans poking their heads out to bridge a whole fleet? What you mean to tell me is, it's ok for that to happen ..but not for someone to bump them out and murder them? I've got to ask CCP ...who's proverbial phallus are you on right now?
As a wormhole dweller...I have no issues with bumping stuff out of pos's, especially if your security let in a spy to learn pos passwords. It's a part of the game ..take it out ......change some stuff ...or screw off CCP.
If you're /inside/ the shield, it's fine.
Quote:from outside without having the correct password or corporation/alliance permissions as configured in the tower settings, is considered an exploit. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Alphea Abbra
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
455
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
S0mveraa wrote:It's not an "exploit". It fits right in with the very spirit of eve. Corporate theft and espionage. If you take this out, you will have to make joining someone's corp to steal stuff, a ban able offense, or take off POS shield passwords at all. You've made some bad decisions recently CCP....but REALLY. What in the WORLD are you thinking?
Does this effect Titans poking their heads out to bridge a whole fleet? What you mean to tell me is, it's ok for that to happen ..but not for someone to bump them out and murder them? I've got to ask CCP ...who's proverbial phallus are you on right now?
As a wormhole dweller...I have no issues with bumping stuff out of pos's, especially if your security let in a spy to learn pos passwords. It's a part of the game ..take it out ......change some stuff ...or screw off CCP. Are you in the wrong thread? I ask because, while you did post in a thread about some specific uses of POS shields and their protection / lack thereof being against the rules, your post did not in any way give a hint to being on that particular subject. In fact, one could think that your "spirit of eve. Corporate theft and espionage." would be strenghtened.
For the rest of the hysteria... Why are the CFC members the somewhat sensible here? |

S0mveraa
Isotope Laboratories The Laughing Men
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:31:00 -
[45] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:S0mveraa wrote:It's not an "exploit". It fits right in with the very spirit of eve. Corporate theft and espionage. If you take this out, you will have to make joining someone's corp to steal stuff, a ban able offense, or take off POS shield passwords at all. You've made some bad decisions recently CCP....but REALLY. What in the WORLD are you thinking?
Does this effect Titans poking their heads out to bridge a whole fleet? What you mean to tell me is, it's ok for that to happen ..but not for someone to bump them out and murder them? I've got to ask CCP ...who's proverbial phallus are you on right now?
As a wormhole dweller...I have no issues with bumping stuff out of pos's, especially if your security let in a spy to learn pos passwords. It's a part of the game ..take it out ......change some stuff ...or screw off CCP. If you're /inside/ the shield, it's fine. Quote:from outside without having the correct password or corporation/alliance permissions as configured in the tower settings, is considered an exploit.
So that goes back to my other question. No bumping titan's out sticking their huge heads out to bridge? Why not just make 'em gtfo of pos shields all the way to do it ? |

Vald Tegor
Empyrean Guard Tactical Narcotics Team
79
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 23:49:00 -
[46] - Quote
S0mveraa wrote: So that goes back to my other question. No bumping titan's out sticking their huge heads out to bridge? Why not just make 'em gtfo of pos shields all the way to do it ?
A basic understanding of the English language would indicate that a ship sticking out of the shield is not within the shield, and therefore not protected by this ruling. |

Molenius Morrowinger
M - Intergalactics Inq.
11
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 00:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
In sandbox I want to bump whatever I want wherever I want. And deal with consequences. Otherwise it is theme park. |

Anklemelter
AM Industries
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 00:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Quote:Greetings, GM Bunyip here.
Unfortunately I cannot easily tell what exactly happened to move your ship into the blast radius, as our logs are not fully comprehensive when it comes to tracking movements and so on.
Best regards, GM Bunyip EVE Online Customer Support Team Good luck with them logs CCP |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
585
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 00:46:00 -
[49] - Quote
S0mveraa wrote:
So that goes back to my other question. No bumping titan's out sticking their huge heads out to bridge? Why not just make 'em gtfo of pos shields all the way to do it ?
Can you target said titan sticking it's head out? If so, then it is outside the shield for sure.
If you can't target said titan, report it as an exploit the other way if it can bridge while technically inside the POS shield as far as targeting goes.
If you can't target it, then it 'probably' counts as inside the POS shield, as the pilot of it can't shoot at you in order to stop you, but CCP clarification on if that applies would be a good thing. |

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor Cosmic Consortium
4383
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 01:36:00 -
[50] - Quote
Anklemelter wrote:Quote:Greetings, GM Bunyip here.
[The logs show nothing] Good luck with them logs CCP
The logs don't show enough information to determine whether your ship was inside the blast radius of an explosion in space.
The logs certainly do show enough information to determine that someone has fit their ship and has engaged in the appropriate type of activity to exploit this particular flaw in game mechanics.
Don't assume that the logs always show nothing just because CCP wouldn't reimburse the battleship that got bombed to oblivion because you were busy making a sandwich for your girlfriend.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
|

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
785
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 01:49:00 -
[51] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:Anklemelter wrote:Quote:Greetings, GM Bunyip here.
[The logs show nothing] Good luck with them logs CCP The logs don't show enough information to determine whether your ship was inside the blast radius of an explosion in space. The logs certainly do show enough information to determine that someone has fit their ship and has engaged in the appropriate type of activity to exploit this particular flaw in game mechanics. Don't assume that the logs always show nothing just because CCP wouldn't reimburse the battleship that got bombed to oblivion because you were busy making a sandwich for your girlfriend.
Also don't assume they really have to show anything for them to ban you. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
606

|
Posted - 2013.12.07 02:29:00 -
[52] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting it.
The rules: 9. Posting of private CCP communication is prohibited.
The posting of private communication between the Game Masters, EVE Team members, Moderators, Administrators of the forums and forum users is prohibited. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties. ISD Ezwal Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
774
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 03:02:00 -
[53] - Quote
Molenius Morrowinger wrote:In sandbox I want to bump whatever I want wherever I want. And deal with consequences. Otherwise it is theme park.
There are cat turds in this sandbox. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. Captain Tardbar: The official grumpy cat of General Discussion. |

Caviar Liberta
Moira. Villore Accords
234
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 03:51:00 -
[54] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:I'd be quite happy to see the elimination of POS bubbles, replacing it with a different mechanic. Such as the ability to anchor a super cap to a structure, locking it down.
That's certainly been suggested by CCP as the way things will be going. AOE effects like POS bubbles make CCP Veritas cry.
Edit:
For people who didn't read the notification properly:
This isn't about AWOXers bumping ships out so their mates can steal/explode them.
This is about people outside the POS bubble, bumping a ship that is technically Inside the bubble, so that the ship leaves the bubble.
It use to be called pos bowling |

Garresh
Team Chicken and Waffles
304
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 03:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
It is an exploit. I think most griefers will agree with this ruling, as it doesn't stop awoxing, infiltration, and all the usual shenanigans we know and love. This Space Intentionally Left Blank |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6700
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 07:44:00 -
[56] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:It's not an exploit to bump a ship out of the pos if you're legitimately able to enter the pos shields. This includes guessing the password or learning it through espionage.
If the shields are supposed to keep you out though, then you shouldn't be able to bump something out of them.
I'm not aware of how this exploit works but I agree with CCP's call here. I feel I should clarify my position here: I would actually agree with some of the other posters here that if a portion of the collision sphere of the ship is outside of the shields, then one should be able to use that to bump a ship out of the shields. Again I don't know if that's actually how the exploit is supposed to work, but if it is then it shouldn't be an exploit. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

McDarila
Lost Society Get Off My Lawn
13
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:19:00 -
[57] - Quote
I would now like to take the time remind everyone that was in or part way pos shield and bumped out to ask for their titan back. I sure there are a number that we(the CFC) would like refunded. Like wise I beleve BoB, Test, and few others are in the same boat.
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
660
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:51:00 -
[58] - Quote
Exploiting that the server works in one second ticks and thus getting inside the FF for a second sounds like an exploit to me. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 10:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
It seems the issue was that supercaps, in a small POS, were very hard to position entirely inside the field. The solution should be: Don't park your supercap in a small POS. Upgrade.
I don't understand the logic in calling this an exploit. When I first read the update I did; upon further thinking it doesn't make sense. |

dexington
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
893
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 10:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Exploiting that the server works in one second ticks and thus getting inside the FF for a second sounds like an exploit to me.
Would all checks regardless of which second they happen not be validated with the same FF password rules? I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous. |
|

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1141
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 11:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:It seems the issue was that supercaps, in a small POS, were very hard to position entirely inside the field. The solution should be: Don't park your supercap in a small POS. Upgrade.
I don't understand the logic in calling this an exploit. When I first read the update I did; upon further thinking it doesn't make sense. Then maybe consider the possibility that the TMC reporter is talking out of his ass and that some way to bump a ship that is fully inside the forcefield without the bumper having access to the POS shield has been found.
We all know that such methods have existed in the past (penetrate forcefield you don't have access to through warp or cyno , get ejected at high speed, bump ships inside the POS on your way out). If such a method had been found and been brought to the attention of CCP it would only make sense for them to rule it an exploit and lo' and behold the statement they would write would have to look just like the one in front of us.
There's no reason to assume that CCP is even more ******** than usual when the most literal reading of their statement provides an entirely plausible meaning. |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1141
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 11:25:00 -
[62] - Quote
In related news my FC yesterday was 100% convinced that the statement means that CCP has banned the use of hostile pos passwords to enter the shields of a hostile POS without its owners' authorization.
It's like people read the caption of the announcement and then just let their imagination run wild, the more outlandish the claim the better. |

Lee Janssen
Tr0pa de elite. Pandemic Legion
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 14:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Amusing thread is amusing. |

seth Hendar
I love you miners
260
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 14:13:00 -
[64] - Quote
Vald Tegor wrote:S0mveraa wrote: So that goes back to my other question. No bumping titan's out sticking their huge heads out to bridge? Why not just make 'em gtfo of pos shields all the way to do it ?
A basic understanding of the English language would indicate that a ship sticking out of the shield is not within the shield, and therefore not protected by this ruling. that's the problem
a titan can be inside the shield, if you bas yourself on the locking mechanism, but still have a part of it's collision model outside, thus allowinf it to be bumped.
in a nutshell, you cannot lock it BUT you can bump it, from OUTSIDE the shield.
and so, this usecase can OR cannot be bannable, depending on the fact CCP consider it within the shield or not (wich will depend if they base this on the locking mechanism, or the collision model mechanism) |

Dont UseYourAlt OnTheForums
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 14:17:00 -
[65] - Quote
I THINK CCP IS TOTALLY WRONG BANNING PEOPLE FOR THIS
IF THEY DONT WANT IT TO HAPPEN THEN FIX THE DAMN GAME MECHANIC
NOT JUST BAN PEOPLE BECAUSE THEIR OWN GAME MECHANICS ARENT WORKING AS SUPPOSED.
NOT OUR FAULT YOUR GAME MECHANICS ARE AS THEY ARE, YOU WANT US TO BEHAVE IN A CERTAIN WAY THEN FIX YOUR OWN GAME MECHANICS
YOU ARE WRONG BANNING PEOPLE FOR THIS. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17664
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 14:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
Dont UseYourAlt OnTheForums wrote:NOT OUR FAULT YOUR GAME MECHANICS ARE AS THEY ARE, YOU WANT US TO BEHAVE IN A CERTAIN WAY THEN FIX YOUR OWN GAME MECHANICS GǪand until they do, they're going to tell people not to take advantage of the unintended behaviour and ban those who do.
It's not a particularly new, strange, or difficult concept. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1144
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 23:18:00 -
[67] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:It seems the issue was that supercaps, in a small POS, were very hard to position entirely inside the field. The solution should be: Don't park your supercap in a small POS. Upgrade.
I don't understand the logic in calling this an exploit. When I first read the update I did; upon further thinking it doesn't make sense. Then maybe consider the possibility that the TMC reporter is talking out of his ass and that some way to bump a ship that is fully inside the forcefield without the bumper having access to the POS shield has been found. We all know that such methods have existed in the past (penetrate forcefield you don't have access to through warp or cyno , get ejected at high speed, bump ships inside the POS on your way out). If such a method had been found and been brought to the attention of CCP it would only make sense for them to rule it an exploit and lo' and behold the statement they would write would have to look just like the one in front of us. There's no reason to assume that CCP is even more ******** than usual when the most literal reading of their statement provides an entirely plausible meaning. exploit details have come to light, turns out I was spot on.  |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2130
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 23:55:00 -
[68] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:Vera Algaert wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:It seems the issue was that supercaps, in a small POS, were very hard to position entirely inside the field. The solution should be: Don't park your supercap in a small POS. Upgrade.
I don't understand the logic in calling this an exploit. When I first read the update I did; upon further thinking it doesn't make sense. Then maybe consider the possibility that the TMC reporter is talking out of his ass and that some way to bump a ship that is fully inside the forcefield without the bumper having access to the POS shield has been found. We all know that such methods have existed in the past (penetrate forcefield you don't have access to through warp or cyno , get ejected at high speed, bump ships inside the POS on your way out). If such a method had been found and been brought to the attention of CCP it would only make sense for them to rule it an exploit and lo' and behold the statement they would write would have to look just like the one in front of us. There's no reason to assume that CCP is even more ******** than usual when the most literal reading of their statement provides an entirely plausible meaning. exploit details have come to light, turns out I was spot on. 
That's :tinfoil: for you. People just love to talk about things that they have far less than full information on, and assume the sky is falling. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1793
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 00:22:00 -
[69] - Quote
This thread delivers. :) Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6719
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 01:40:00 -
[70] - Quote
Dont UseYourAlt OnTheForums wrote: I think CCP is totally wrong banning people for this
If they don't want it to happen then fix the damn game mechanic
Not just ban people because their own game mechanics arent working as supposed.
Not our fault your game mechanics are as they are, you want us to behave a certain way then fix your own game mechanics
You are wrong banning people for this.
Made easy to read.
Also, it's a lot easier said than done, fixing broken game mechanics. You don't work for CCP, so you have no clue whatsoever as to the complexity of the programming involved here.
Vera Algaert wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:It seems the issue was that supercaps, in a small POS, were very hard to position entirely inside the field. The solution should be: Don't park your supercap in a small POS. Upgrade.
I don't understand the logic in calling this an exploit. When I first read the update I did; upon further thinking it doesn't make sense. Then maybe consider the possibility that the TMC reporter is talking out of his ass and that some way to bump a ship that is fully inside the forcefield without the bumper having access to the POS shield has been found. We all know that such methods have existed in the past (penetrate forcefield you don't have access to through warp or cyno , get ejected at high speed, bump ships inside the POS on your way out). If such a method had been found and been brought to the attention of CCP it would only make sense for them to rule it an exploit and lo' and behold the statement they would write would have to look just like the one in front of us. There's no reason to assume that CCP is even more ******** than usual when the most literal reading of their statement provides an entirely plausible meaning. I tried explaining this to my CEO, but he was really drunk at the time and kept going on about titans and supers with their asses hanging out in small POSes. Heh. (Hi Jmay). Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5288
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 01:56:00 -
[71] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:I tried explaining this to my CEO, but he was really drunk at the time and kept going on about titans and supers with their asses hanging out in small POSes. Heh. (Hi Jmay). man, those small poses are deadly There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Cat o'Ninetails
Rancer Defence League
9
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 03:38:00 -
[72] - Quote
hi cat here
i think ccp is noble and honourable because they have made this decree as it was only used by people looking to take away from other peoples hard works so i think it is a good thing because many people want to have save ships and stuff so it is annoying if other people cannot defend them
maybe someone can make a POS defence league lol
x |

Karrl Tian
Bourbon Bandits Anarchy.
270
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 03:54:00 -
[73] - Quote
So it's back to cutting their power? Bail is expensive, CCP. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
647
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 05:10:00 -
[74] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:So who died to cause this ruling?
Don't know who the victim was this time, but it seems CCP logs have improved over the years. They went from "Our logs show nothing" to "Our logs show everything".
Try petitioning something.
The logs still show nothing I'll wager.
|

Daquaris
The Loathsome Lions
71
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 07:27:00 -
[75] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:So it's back to cutting their power?  Bail is expensive, CCP.
It's the only way to be sure. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
648
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 07:38:00 -
[76] - Quote
Nuking them from orbit is the only way to be sure. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1304
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:14:00 -
[77] - Quote
Dont UseYourAlt OnTheForums wrote: SHOUTING.
please stop it High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
602
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 16:28:00 -
[78] - Quote
Vald Tegor wrote:S0mveraa wrote: So that goes back to my other question. No bumping titan's out sticking their huge heads out to bridge? Why not just make 'em gtfo of pos shields all the way to do it ?
A basic understanding of the English language would indicate that a ship sticking out of the shield is not within the shield, and therefore not protected by this ruling.
I might have suggested using the words "entirely within" just to make the ruling clear and prevent a ton of useless forum debate... maybe. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |