|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
baltec1
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 07:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
I make 20 mil every time my wallet flashes which is enough to pay for around 20 gank thashers, 2 gank rax or one gank brutix. The interdiction will continue. |
baltec1
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Smidsy Honest wrote:I'm kinda expecting an increase in suicide ganks when the winter patch hits down. At least short term. I know a few people that are starting to stack up ready for a bit of "you thought this would stop it?" action. I suspect this will be more a case of idiots having to prove they can still cause misery and grief to players so they can saciate their own sadistic desires. I am certain they'll ramp up their suicide ganks because they have some macho stuff to prove. This is a small symbolic victory for miners (ie carebears) which means it's a huge kick in the nuts to the Schadenfreude bunch. In a sense their "tear-collecting" flow has been slightly reduced and they will make noise and cry lots of tears to make themselves heard and attention be paid. So yes, I expect misery to beget company.
wow...
man are you a bitter one. |
baltec1
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Silly goon. You gank for the "lulz" dontcha? Grief play and misery make you happy. And you are planning to ramp up suicides, aren't you? Nothing bitter about these truths. But I see what you are trying to do .
Nah I gank for isk, the tears are just a bonus. If ganks are going to go up them my investment in more thrasher and med neutron blaster BPOs will bring me even more profits. I may even get a retriever BPO in time for hulkageddon |
baltec1
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 01:10:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gealla wrote:
Probably, if CCP's goal is to increase the eve playerbase numbers to the point where it once again afford to diversify into other title production, so all of thier eggs aren't in the same proverbial basket, then catering to the casual masses is the only way to go.
Wow may not be hard core sandbox like eve, but it has over 11million paying subs....something ccp is sure to have noticed. The cold hard business facts are, cater to the majority if you want to make money, the minority will either adapt or find something else.
Having there business direction dictated to them by a bunch of online gamers who suddenly decided to unsub etc due to incarna will have, if nothing else, opened their eyes to the pitfalls of catering to the minority..
tldr - Eve will go casual, so ccp can grow.
Everyone that has chased after WOWs subs has failed. Every MMO that changed its makeup to go after WOW subs has collapsed.
EVE has done nothing but grow year on year so there is no need to change and go soft. |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 09:27:00 -
[5] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:This simply makes solo-ganking impossible, and encourages, yet more blobbing style attacks. Even with an isk penalty implemented, people will still suicide thrashers/rifters etc to kill people. The only way to solve this problem is to ether make highsec completely safe, (ie: no players can damage another player) or we debuff concord and teach the newbies how to play eve like it was made to be played. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DBVH6IVxas
How does this make solo ganking impossible? |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Jack Dant wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Andski wrote:Very few "PvPers" sell GTCs for ISK to fund themselves. true but the/an they are not pure PvPers, they got at least one alt attached to making iSK, which makes them EVE players. As i stated few posts above. An EVE Player is someone who plays EVE. That's the only valid definition, not the one you invent yourself. Thats the whole point. EVE player is one who plays EVE as you wrote. Yet somehow some people feel that their play-style is only way how to play EVE.
The irony is strong in this post |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 15:20:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote:Montevius Williams wrote:Outta curiosity if the enemey brings 50 BS's to gank a Freighter full of really expensive cargo flying through high sec gate to gate instead of autopiloting how is that anywhere near fair to the frieghter pilot? You cant fit it better and gate to gate is the quickest way to do it. You cant fly with support against that many enemies and theres no real way to know if they are coming for you some times even if you have scouts 3 systems out. I would like to know the answer to this as well.
Dont stuff the frieghter to such an extent that it makes it worth ganking. |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 16:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Dear god the level of the TEARS on this thread is epic.
So you LADIES cannot GANK anyone because OH NOES ITS TO EXPENSIVEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!11111111111one
Grow a pair, grab your Tornado and gank that boat, son!
Im starting to think people who post things like this arn't being entirely honest about reading this topic. |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:01:00 -
[9] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:So suicide ganking becomes a tiny little bit more challenging. Not removed, just they no longer receive insurance money. Suicide ganking is brought a little bit more in line on where it should be and... grief/lulz players and gankers go ballistic flooding this thread with tears and screams of unfairness. Wow, the very same folks that preach "HTFU" and other such mantra.
Is it too soon if I say "C'mon folks, it's just pixels."?
No this thread is full of gankers who dont care about the change, people like you who are chest beating about tears which arn't there and tippia baiting. |
baltec1
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 17:07:00 -
[10] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:baltec1 wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:So suicide ganking becomes a tiny little bit more challenging. Not removed, just they no longer receive insurance money. Suicide ganking is brought a little bit more in line on where it should be and... grief/lulz players and gankers go ballistic flooding this thread with tears and screams of unfairness. Wow, the very same folks that preach "HTFU" and other such mantra.
Is it too soon if I say "C'mon folks, it's just pixels."? No this thread is full of gankers who dont care about the change, people like you who are chest beating about tears which arn't there and tippia baiting. Of course you don't care and aren't crying about it. That's why you're here posting to let me know how much you don't care .
Im waiting for night to finish on minecraft so I can get back to building my temple without the creepers getting me |
|
baltec1
181
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:MeestaPenni wrote:[quote=Jita Alt666]Where are the huge majority of ships being destroyed?
I just looked at it again.....the "most secure" part of the EvE universe has the greatest rate of destroyed ships. Does that not seem paradoxical to you? Not at all considering highsec is where most of the players are at any given moment. Yeah it is.....One commonly held belief is "safety in numbers." Doesn't seem to hold true here.
Get in a ship, any ship will do and go park yourself on the perimiter gate in jita. Make a note of how long it is before someone kills you. Now do the same in a 0.0 pipe.
Notice the difference. |
baltec1
182
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 08:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Black Dranzer wrote:Suicide Gankers, pre-nerf wrote:Lol HTFU crybabies deal with it adapt or die Suicide Gankers, post-nerf wrote:WTF CCP fix it you're ruining the game why won't you subsidize my ganking BAWWWW THERE IS NO MIDDLE FINGER BIG ENOUGH.
This made me giggle.
|
baltec1
182
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 16:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Well this thread has gone from bad to horrible while I was away |
baltec1
182
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 08:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
This thread is just getting daft now. |
baltec1
182
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 09:52:00 -
[15] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:baltec1 wrote:Well this thread has gone from bad to horrible while I was away well. at least you was having fun trying to kill carrier..... but had bad luck.... dunno what happened but defence fleet was disbanded before organized because carrier got safe
I was on the BF3 CCP server when that happened
I did get to mess around with 90 IRC last night in our 18 man gang |
|
|
|