| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Roxanna Kell
   |
Posted - 2006.03.04 15:43:00 -
[1]
i recall tomb saying that there would be a new missile type for cruisers
jsut like the bs's have torpedos, and the frigates have rockets.
the cruisers should have their assault missiles.
medium missiles of short range slow velocity but high damage.
are those plans still in, or completly scrapped?
|
Ishen Villone
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 16:43:00 -
[2]
Heavy Missiles?
|
lofty29
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 16:46:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Roxanna Kell
i recall tomb saying that there would be a new missile type for cruisers
jsut like the bs's have torpedos, and the frigates have rockets.
the cruisers should have their assault missiles.
medium missiles of short range slow velocity but high damage.
are those plans still in, or completly scrapped?
You dont need one. Heavy's have great range and great damage. Then you have assault launchers which are the best anti-frigate weapon. Stop whining.
---------------------------
Originally by: Wrangler
I see boobies!! \o/
|
Cade Morrigan
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:04:00 -
[4]
That's not a whine, and this topic was at one point not so long ago posted by the devs, so chill on him.
If I recall correctly the missile was going to be like rocket ammo for assault launchers... larger payload than a light missile but shorter range. Not 100% sure but that's what sticks in my mind.
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:21:00 -
[5]
yep they were confirmed to be "on the way", and no we haven't heard anything since  .
______________________________________________
Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. *snip*snip brought to you by Kaemonn --Jorauk |
Spuki
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:28:00 -
[6]
Hope they dont change the Heavy Missiles then. I really like them on my cerberus as they are at the moment.
|
Harry Voyager
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:35:00 -
[7]
Where these going to replace Ligth Missiles in Assault Launchers, or supplement them? Or do we even know yet?
Harry Voyager
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:35:00 -
[8]
I hope they dont remove assult launchers firing light missles.
If they do there will only be one T2 ship that that takes advantage of having light misiles trained up for T2 gear - the Crow.
The pathetic Hawk only holds 2 missle and has only 1 bonus, so it seems to work better with 3 guns.
Wherever you went - here you are.
|
Nafri
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:37:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Harry Voyager
Where these going to replace Ligth Missiles in Assault Launchers, or supplement them? Or do we even know yet?
Harry Voyager
thy going to be torps for cruisers
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:38:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Harry Voyager
Where these going to replace Ligth Missiles in Assault Launchers, or supplement them? Or do we even know yet?
Harry Voyager
it went something like this
nub: "there needs to be a close-range form of cruiser missile, like heavy rockets"
tomb: "we prefer to call them assault missiles"
nub: "omg tomb posted in my thread!!! when will they be released??"
tomb: "soon"
Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. *snip*red snip brought to you by Kaemonn. PS, you're hot.--Jorauk |
Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:43:00 -
[11]
TomB also said that there would be more tweaks with the missiles, wonder if he was just trying to stop us from whining 
---------------------------------------------
<Make ECM Burst useful>
ECM Burst Idea! |
Shinnen
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 17:54:00 -
[12]
I believe that it was once said that they are supposed to be a mix between rockets and torps. :/
---
Selfdestruct Proposal
400x120@24000 bytes Maximum please. -Capsicum
would you like some cheese with that whine? - Shinnen
|
Dreez
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 18:00:00 -
[13]
@ OP. Cruisers dont need missiles that hits harder. Heavy missiles
already hit as hard as cruisermissiles did before the new skills
were deployed on the market.
New missiles for cruisers that would be like torpedos will make
the Cerberus way to powerfull.
Current Location: After chasing TomB for 2 years,
at the pub, getting a cold beer.
|
Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 18:07:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Dreez
@ OP. Cruisers dont need missiles that hits harder. Heavy missiles
already hit as hard as cruisermissiles did before the new skills
were deployed on the market.
New missiles for cruisers that would be like torpedos will make
the Cerberus way to powerfull.
yeah and a boost to L-blasters will make the mega way too powerful...oh wait
---------------------------------------------
<Make ECM Burst useful>
ECM Burst Idea! |
Yezah
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:07:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Yezah on 04/03/2006 19:07:20
I would like to see them, as there should be an option for a short range missile system for cruisers, since every other weapon system has them.
|
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:08:00 -
[16]
nerf the damage of heavies by a third, and give assault missiles 33% more damage than heavys have now.
Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. *snip*red snip brought to you by Kaemonn. PS, you're hot.--Jorauk |
Professor McFly
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:18:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Sarmaul
yep they were confirmed to be "on the way", and no we haven't heard anything since .
It takes at least a year for any feature to be moved from "on the way" to "next patch".
__________________
Retard's handbook |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:20:00 -
[18]
The "assualt missile" dosn't exist. If you want heavy rockets, they sahould go in a new launcher.
Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command |
Kyoko Sakoda
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:26:00 -
[19]
Yes... They're coming... dun dun dun... 
Learn what it means to be Caldari - www.omertasyndicate.com |
Cade Morrigan
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:42:00 -
[20]
IIRC the idea wasn't to replace light missiles in assault launchers, but to create a second type of ammo for them. As posted above, this additional form of ammo was supposed to be better than light missiles against cruisers. I don't know that I feel such an ammo type is needed, but it might be nifty.
|
Spartan239
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 19:47:00 -
[21]
maybe tomb shoudl be left alone until blasters and the phoon are fixed, cause blasters were promised a fix soon after rmr and there was nothign in blood
|
B0rn2KiLL
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:02:00 -
[22]
/signed
AssualtFerox ftw!
---
When It Absolutely Positively Has To Be Desotroyed. |
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:06:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 04/03/2006 19:29:42
The "assualt missile" dosn't exist. If you want heavy rockets, they should go in a new launcher.
(replacing assualt launchers would be a nerf to ships that used secondary missile launchers lile, oh, minmatar cruisers...)
the assault missile does not exist... yet. And why not have dual-use assault launchers? light missiles or assault missiles.
Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. *snip*red snip brought to you by Kaemonn. PS, you're hot.--Jorauk |
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:08:00 -
[24]
That'd work, kinda.
Remembering I want heavy rocket launchers for use on the bomber so I'd prefer it seperate...
(Plus the low fitting cost of the assualt launcher would limit the heavy rocket power)
Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command |
Sarmaul
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:10:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Maya Rkell
That'd work, kinda.
Remembering I want heavy rocket launchers for use on the bomber so I'd prefer it seperate...
(Plus the low fitting cost of the assualt launcher would limit the heavy rocket power)
so you want assault missiles on a stealth bomber? ummm... no :)
Please do not discuss actions taken by forum moderators, even in your sig. *snip*red snip brought to you by Kaemonn. PS, you're hot.--Jorauk |
Wesley Harding
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:32:00 -
[26]
I'd like an unguided missle system comparable to rockets and torps for cruisers.
|
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 20:35:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Sarmaul
Originally by: Maya Rkell
That'd work, kinda.
Remembering I want heavy rocket launchers for use on the bomber so I'd prefer it seperate...
(Plus the low fitting cost of the assualt launcher would limit the heavy rocket power)
so you want assault missiles on a stealth bomber? ummm... no :)
Yes, astonishly enough I'd like a Bomber which was effective against cruiser+ targets rather than other frigates.
Digital Communist> The Jin-Mei are probably more profficient in training for Tofu and Noodles than Spaceship Command |
Roxanna Kell
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 21:05:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Roxanna Kell on 04/03/2006 21:08:51
Originally by: lofty29
Originally by: Roxanna Kell
i recall tomb saying that there would be a new missile type for cruisers
jsut like the bs's have torpedos, and the frigates have rockets.
the cruisers should have their assault missiles.
medium missiles of short range slow velocity but high damage.
are those plans still in, or completly scrapped?
You dont need one. Heavy's have great range and great damage. Then you have assault launchers which are the best anti-frigate weapon. Stop whining.
i ve jsut asked if they got scraped or not.
wtf makes u think im whining
Originally by: Dreez
@ OP. Cruisers dont need missiles that hits harder. Heavy missiles
already hit as hard as cruisermissiles did before the new skills
were deployed on the market.
New missiles for cruisers that would be like torpedos will make
the Cerberus way to powerfull.
hey you want ur blasters fixed? 
|
Roxanna Kell
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 21:29:00 -
[29]
guys simple
heavys are fine atm,
my normal t1 heavys have 97m explosion radius.
frigs have 40m signature radius
i can still hit frig ok with normals heavys, well 59% less dmg
less range ( you acnt say cerebrus will benifit as its a long range ship).
less velocity (your missiles only do damage if they hit).
higher explosion radius. ( not so good against frigs and cruisers, will be only good vs cruisers if you have maxed missile skills, other wise you ll be looking at a 30% dmg reduction roughly).
this ain t something i made up, its somethign tomb said.
iam happy with the missiels atm, and the precisions missiles are wounderfull
37 explosion radius, can kick any frigs ass with a volley.
and the way under 5 sec rof i get wirh just 3 bcu 2 is also something to be proud off, soon to be lower in 2 weeks time. ocne i get the specialsiation skill to lvl 5.
regardles all i wanted to know if at all possible, are they still coming or should i stop drooling over em,
|
Sentani
|
Posted - 2006.03.04 21:51:00 -
[30]
id rahter have more DPS...
the heavies arnt that good against bigger targets like battleships...
id like it to be a mini-torpedo doing 225 damage with 30-40km range...
heavy rockets would be sweet to... maybe 75-100 dmage and 25km range...
____________________________________________________________
The Eris Goes Straight to your Head.  |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |