| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jill Chastot
Modulated Dreams
AAA Citizens
38
   |
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:20:00 -
[91] - Quote
"Just"
HA
I laugh too much at this topic |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy
The ROC
1799
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:23:00 -
[92] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:PVE-centric players ... well, we'll have to see if CCP gets worried about the casual players unsubbing too quickly for their financial comfort. Screw those people. I hate that attitude so much, it is literally the reason why I gank, scam, and grief as hard as I do. Because people try to hold my gameplay hostage by threatening to quit because they don't like how I play. If they want a kiddie ride, there are plenty of other games to play. In fact, there is EVERY OTHER game to play. So they can get the hell out of my game. Your game? The ego is strong in this one.
There are plenty of carebear games out there. Nearly everything else on the market caters to your ilk.
We have one game. EVE. Quit trying to put your chocolate in my peanut butter, I like it the way it is.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1628
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:37:00 -
[93] - Quote
Dear Kaarous, why do you persume that the 'other me' is in any way a care-bear?
If it helps put your mind at ease, I have never mined, not even once.
Can I join your pixel hard-man club now please?
You are still my favourite poster, never stop posting.
Eve in simple terms, you undock, you accept the risk of being ganked anywhere anytime.
This is not a signature. |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3791
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:40:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quit trying to put your chocolate in my peanut butter...
Better to read that in a forum than to hear that in prison.
|
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1628
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:43:00 -
[95] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quit trying to put your chocolate in my peanut butter... Better to read that in a forum than to hear that in prison.
Very witty [:)
This is not a signature. |
Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association
Independent Faction
371
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:49:00 -
[96] - Quote
Abisha Baboli wrote:
yea their are 100's of other space games available right......
their is only like what 20 space games ever released man
What may or may not have any bearing is that two of them that will (most likely) directly compete with eve will coming out in the near future.
Unless your thread is limited to how 'awesum!' Eve Online is, ISD will lock the thread.-á You will find it is particularly common if CCP might have to make a public response to the thread subject, as opposed to bury it in the GM que for the forseeable future and then prohibit telling anyone what the GM said, if it's ever answered at all. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy
The ROC
1799
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 00:49:00 -
[97] - Quote
Quote:Dear Kaarous, why do you persume that the 'other me' is in any way a care-bear?
Advocate for them, become one. As far as I can tell anyway.
That is however a digression.
It's "my" game, insomuch as it is the game of everyone who still believes in non consensual PvP.
The people who don't, can leave for all I care. But they don't get to mess up this game with their bullshit. If they want consent only PvP, there is literally every other game out there for them.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
Joia Crenca
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:18:00 -
[98] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Dear Kaarous, why do you persume that the 'other me' is in any way a care-bear?
Advocate for them, become one. As far as I can tell anyway. That is however a digression. It's "my" game, insomuch as it is the game of everyone who still believes in non consensual PvP. The people who don't, can leave for all I care. But they don't get to mess up this game with their bullshit. If they want consent only PvP, there is literally every other game out there for them.
So are you saying that we need someone's consent to engage in meta-game 'rules pvp'? That we can't have non-consensual game mechanics changes? |
Joia Crenca
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:27:00 -
[99] - Quote
Going back to the thread, I keep hearing about bling ships, and while lessening the value of your ship is a way to lower your personal risk (not eliminate, only lower), that only goes as far as others being slower to do the same.
Destroyer ganking is profitable by a wide enough margin, that even removing the 'just ganking for tears' element, we could have people mostly running t1 ships with t1 mods and still be enough to pay for new destroyers and the time involved in the gank party.
It would be sad, but interesting to see the effect on the game if the ganks increase by 3 or 4 times the rate we're seeing now. (Also, while someone may replace their officer mod once, they might not do it after the next gank, so if enough blingers give up, will those that sell those mods be stuck with unsellable deadspace loot?) |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy
The ROC
1799
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 01:28:00 -
[100] - Quote
Joia Crenca wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:Dear Kaarous, why do you persume that the 'other me' is in any way a care-bear?
Advocate for them, become one. As far as I can tell anyway. That is however a digression. It's "my" game, insomuch as it is the game of everyone who still believes in non consensual PvP. The people who don't, can leave for all I care. But they don't get to mess up this game with their bullshit. If they want consent only PvP, there is literally every other game out there for them. So are you saying that we need someone's consent to engage in meta-game 'rules pvp'? That we can't have non-consensual game mechanics changes?
Are you suggesting that forum campaigns to legislate the other party out of existence is how carebears engage in PvP?
If so then I agree. The last time any of them actually fought back against me with anything but words was making a thread asking for Catalysts to have one less turret.
Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |