| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
254
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:10:00 -
[121] - Quote
We're obviously the Geth.
We must reach consensus. |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
254
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:10:00 -
[122] - Quote
:itisamasseffectreference: |

EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
254
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:11:00 -
[123] - Quote
Only Mass Effect is better than Eve: Online, you see |

Cozmik R5
Dock 94
51
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:15:00 -
[124] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:If you're scamming someone for 500 million ISK, he's not a newbie.
Agreed. And if someone gets scammed for 500mil ISK, he's a ****** and should give up on gaming! Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try. |

Intakani Genntelle
Aliastra Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:15:00 -
[125] - Quote
Quote:I will not hesitate to move on, and I'm sure others will feel the same way.
Please do. EVE would be a much better place if TEST and Goons were gone. |

Krios Ahzek
Juvenis Iratus
80
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:18:00 -
[126] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Only Mass Effect is better than Eve: Online, you see What if CCP licensed the Mass Effect IP in order to make EVE 2 a Mass Effect MMO? It's practically the same system, except jump gates are replaced with Mass Relays.
Also walking in stations = Unreal Engine 3 combat. I have no tears to cry. |

Barakkus
1046
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:29:00 -
[127] - Quote
Wow, why is this thread still going? It's now 7 pages of pointless arguments. Anything that brings more people into the game to shoot and they stay at is good. Anything that prevents shooting at people (save current mechanics of highsec...need to retain people to shoot at btw) is bad. Goons are an insignificant part of EVE now. BoB is long gone from EVE. Let's move on and shoot each other. End of discussion. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
920
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 17:53:00 -
[128] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Goons are an insignificant part of EVE now.
All of the angry posts about us would indicate otherwise.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 19:05:00 -
[129] - Quote
Recruitment scamming is part of EVE. The people who do it are mouth-breathing fucktards, but that's beside the point.
This change is crap. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:08:00 -
[130] - Quote
Apollo Gabriel wrote:The beatings will continue until morale improves.
Lost hope. Unacceptable in a game where the fun is about mess others day or play time by any means including pathetic "high sec" rules where every one and his dog can do whatever they want with no consequences other than rewards and e-peen. |

AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 20:18:00 -
[131] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:One of our newer members scammed 500 million from some pubbie within 30 minutes of joining Goonwaffe.
He's a goddamn Goon hero.
Just out of curiosity, what do you to members who get successfully scammed and someone proves this with evidence...
Not trolling, just want to know whether it's a slap on the wrists or a kick in the ass...or something more sinister involving a shovel and duct tape.
AK
GÇ£You go into combat, and itGÇÖs NOT going to be WagnerGǪindustrial techno or really hard drum and bassGÇ¥
Reynir Hardarson, founding member of CCP Games, 2002. |

Moustached Slimy Worm
The Skunkworks
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 22:17:00 -
[132] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Maybe they're trying to lose subscribers?
fyp |

Kengutsi Akira
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 23:10:00 -
[133] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Only Mass Effect is better than Eve: Online, you see
have you seen the leaked beta stuff from 3? lol its absolute crap
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=255722#post255722
My stance on WiS |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 02:27:00 -
[134] - Quote
meh who scams in the recruitment chan anyhow? The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Gilbaron
The Scope Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:08:00 -
[135] - Quote
imho everything that has a CCP Seal of Approval on it should be a scam-free zone |

Ris Dnalor
Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:10:00 -
[136] - Quote
'CCP Guard' wrote:Some food for discussion:
1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere? 2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?
I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.
I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.
Let's discuss.
Hands off CCP.
New player joins eve.
New player gets scammed ( doesn't matter where )
New player realizes it and says something, either in local, or help, or perhaps corp chat, after they find a real one.
Old players will rapidly give advice, share their own painful newb stories, and very very often dump far more isk into their wallet then they ever could've been scammed for.
Sure there may be times when a player just immediately rage-quits without saying a word, but frankly if someone does this, then 1 of 2 things are likely true. 1. They'll be back when they calm down, and all of the above will apply, just being delayed by rage. or 2. they will not like eve and they saved themselves a whole bunch of time by finding out early.
so, most importantly:
What do newbs have that's worth scamming aside from tears?
If you really want to protect the newbs, then do 2 things.
1. Send a 'welcome' email to all new subscribers that states the following
Quote:WELCOME TO EVE
You will be scammed. After 60 days of paid subscription time, you will be credited 50m isk into your wallet. This is all you'll get. Scams in eve are a feature, not a bug. Consider this your warning, and in 60 days you'll get reimbursed a reasonable amount of isk. That is all.
2. after 60 days of subscription time, give them 50m isk.
done. fini. nothing to micro-manage. Just writing the code to make this all happen automatically.
And...
If they're not new.
They should've known better.
|

Tyrrax Thorrk
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:14:00 -
[137] - Quote
Yeah let's lock the thread with good well thought out posts (by zagdul f.i.) and redirect to this old steaming pile of *****, good call there CCP Phantom, and by that I mean you're terrible, especially considering you locked it right after CCP Guard said "Let's discuss".
CCP Guard's post from other thread;
Quote:Some food for discussion:
1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere? 2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?
I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.
I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.
Let's discuss.
1. No that's perfectly acceptable and pretty much identical to the help channel rule - That however is not the way the rule is currently phrased, the current version is ********. |

Ris Dnalor
Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan
10
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:19:00 -
[138] - Quote
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:Yeah let's lock the thread with good well thought out posts (by zagdul f.i.) and redirect to this old steaming pile of *****, good call there CCP Phantom, and by that I mean you're terrible, especially considering you locked it right after CCP Guard said "Let's discuss".
.
Bad Phantom
Good Guard.
Forum natzi's in regards to duplicate threads need to figure out that it hasn't gone away in 8+ years, they have never been able to be vigilant enough to stop it all the time. If they persist in the stupidity, I've no problem reporting every thread that could be considered a 'duplicate', but I guarantee they won't have time to lock them all, and there'll be like 12 threads left on the forum that are active. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
794

|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:22:00 -
[139] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:Yeah let's lock the thread with good well thought out posts (by zagdul f.i.) and redirect to this old steaming pile of *****, good call there CCP Phantom, and by that I mean you're terrible, especially considering you locked it right after CCP Guard said "Let's discuss".
. Bad Phantom Good Guard. Forum natzi's in regards to duplicate threads need to figure out that it hasn't gone away in 8+ years, they have never been able to be vigilant enough to stop it all the time. If they persist in the stupidity, I've no problem reporting every thread that could be considered a 'duplicate', but I guarantee they won't have time to lock them all, and there'll be like 12 threads left on the forum that are active.
Now now, my comment is here and the discussion has been streamlined to one thread.
I'd like to hear if people have any comments on my post which is quoted above.  CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|

Raptor217
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 10:29:00 -
[140] - Quote
CCP introduced this scamming block in the recruitment channel to help out the new players. What they don't realize is that many old, naive players, come there looking for corps as well. Recruitment scammers don't go after the newbies because spending a half hour to get 5m and an omen isn't worth it. I myself have scammed billions of isk out of 2 or 3 year old players who think they can just give me their stuff.
So, I have no issue if CCP decided we couldn't recruitment scam people who are less than a month old, or have less than 1m SP. But protecting the 5 year old player who is stupid enough to contract me his faction fit BS and tengu is beyond me.
Also, there are going to be a lot of people posting who want nothing more than the sandbox be whats best for them, rather than eve as a whole. |

HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 11:38:00 -
[141] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Some food for discussion:
1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere? 2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?
I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.
I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.
Let's discuss.
1. CCP designating particular channels to be scam-free-zones is a bad thing, yes. I will quote my corpmate from the other thread:
Yeep wrote:The main currency in EvE is not ISK or AUR, its trust. In a player run channel I have to trust that the people running the channel are going to uphold the rules, that they're not colluding with scammers to take my money. Those people have to earn my trust either directly or through the opinions of other people I already trust. In a CCP run channel where scamming is banned it completely removes trust from the equation. Nobody has to work for my trust because it is provided for them by CCP.
This is why this change is stupid.
If people claim that the effect is minimal because 'you can still recruitment scam people out of local, or set up your own recruitment channel' then those people have totally missed the point. Given the choice between a CCP-approved 'no scamming allowed' channel and other venues where they are open to scams, every player looking for a new corp will choose the safe option. There won't be anyone looking for a new corp in local, or in an unofficial channel, because CCP has provided a recruitment channel which caters to all their needs and is a guaranteed safe haven from scamming. Remember, risk versus reward: why would a player looking for a new corp choose the unsafe option when it provides no advantage? And why would a corp legitimately seeking out new players advertise in an unsafe channel rather than the CCP-approved no scamming zone?
The equivalent would be if CCP designated a particular highsec ice system in each empire's space to be a CCP-approved miner-only zone where suicide ganking, can flipping, and other methods of interdiction are banned and all dead hulks are reimbursed by GMs. After all, if we don't like the new rules we could always go and gank miners somewhere else! The result, of course, would be that every ice miner flocked to the safe systems to do their mining in complete safety, and all other ice belts where ganking was permitted would be deserted.
2. My understanding is that allowing the character bazaar to scam in would be unworkable because CCP charges a real-money fee for transfers, thus opening a hilarious can of worms since scamming somebody out of pretend spacebucks in a pretend space game is somewhat different from taking 20 dollars/euros (if that's still the fee?) from them in real life with the associated legal implications that would follow.
Can baiting etc in the newbie systems is, again, different to recruitment scamming since it deliberately targets new, inexperienced players who are unfamiliar with fairly basic game mechanics. Recruitment scamming rarely targets new, inexperienced players since they don't have significant assets to make the scam worthwhile (a recruitment scam often involves lengthy, time-consuming conversations that make them not worth pulling just for a few million isk and some T1 cruisers). I can say on the occasions where our members have recruitment scammed newbies they've generally been yelled at and mocked in our chat channels. |

HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 11:49:00 -
[142] - Quote
Raptor217 wrote:So, I have no issue if CCP decided we couldn't recruitment scam people who are less than a month old, or have less than 1m SP. But protecting the 5 year old player who is stupid enough to contract me his faction fit BS and tengu is beyond me.
Indeed. If CCP wants to protect naive newbies from recruitment scams, in the same way that it protects them from can baiting in the starter systems, then I've really no problem with that, since there's little skill or material gain from scamming week old newbies out of their missioning cormorant and their 2000 units of veldspar. But make an exemption that specifically protects newbies, not a blanket ban which covers everybody.
The current situation seems a clear example of Malcanis' Law in action: "Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players" |

Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:38:00 -
[143] - Quote
CCP desperately want Pay To Win and Barbie Doll Vampires. I know you think they recanted because they said they did, but perhaps you didn't pay attention to Hilmar's actual words. He desperately sees that as Eve's future.
YOU PESKY CUSTOMERS ARE GETTING IN THE WAY.
Since you rejected his vision for Eve, then it's clear to him that the first thing that needs changing is you lot.
Back to chipping away at the current customers to replace them with children that like shiney baubles. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 12:39:00 -
[144] - Quote
too much drama for "nothing really happened". |

DelBoy Trades
Enslave. GIANTSBANE.
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 13:22:00 -
[145] - Quote
Personally I like this change, it's one more step towards flying mounts, battlegrounds and the sword of a thousand truths. |

Myxx
Atropos Group
145
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 14:18:00 -
[146] - Quote
'CCP Guard' wrote:Some food for discussion:
1. Is it considered a bad thing if the official recruitment channel itself is considered a scam free zone? Given that there's no wider ban against tricking people with recruitment offers elsewhere? 2. Does this take from the free form, fend-for-yourself, nature of EVE any more than let's say...the ban on character trade scams in the Character Bazaar forum or the sanctions against harvesting n00b tears in starter systems with free stuff?
I'm not taking a stance on this topic, only trying to help those who make these decisions better understand your views on these matters.
I can tell you that the sandbox is sacred in our minds here at CCP, but that there is also an understanding that sometimes, lines need to be drawn around certain limited areas for the overall good of the game. My feeling is that most would probably agree with that statement, although I'm sure there are also those who feel that CCP should maintain a complete hands off approach.
Let's discuss.
1) I don't think that its good for the game, I made a post earlier about how scamming is good for the game 2) It is my opinion that the only skullduggery-free zones in the entire game should be the help channel, the newbie channel and the newbie starter systems. Thats it. Anywhere else should be free game for all of the ruthlessness that EVE is known for.
|

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
267
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 15:16:00 -
[147] - Quote
HELIC0N ONE wrote:
Given the choice between a CCP-approved 'no scamming allowed' channel and other venues where they are open to scams, every player looking for a new corp will choose the safe option. There won't be anyone looking for a new corp in local, or in an unofficial channel, because CCP has provided a recruitment channel which caters to all their needs and is a guaranteed safe haven from scamming. Remember, risk versus reward: why would a player looking for a new corp choose the unsafe option when it provides no advantage? And why would a corp legitimately seeking out new players advertise in an unsafe channel rather than the CCP-approved no scamming zone?
this makes no sense to me. "if given the choice" indicates a knowledge of the fact that scamming happens in EVE, in which case a scam-free channel is a moot point since the entire idea of a scam free channel is to protect those who don't know any better.
someone aware enough of scams to choose a scam free channel is not going to be the best target for a scam if you know what I mean.
its not like someone is waving a banner around that says "come to this channel, for completely safe happy fun time" but a stoopid n00b will most likely manage to find the recruitment channel just because its the recruitment channel and not have any idea that the place is a scam free zone anyway. The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Xython
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
219
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 15:31:00 -
[148] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:One of our newer members scammed 500 million from some pubbie within 30 minutes of joining Goonwaffe.
He's a goddamn Goon hero. Just out of curiosity, what do you to members who get successfully scammed and someone proves this with evidence... Not trolling, just want to know whether it's a slap on the wrists or a kick in the ass...or something more sinister involving a shovel and duct tape. AK
It's early and Skyrim still isn't done downloading (thanks Qwest DSL!) so I'm not quite certain I'm following what you're asking.
What would we do, if, we happened to discover one of the members of Goonswarm Federation had just happened to get scammed by another ... Player? Goon?
If it's another player, we laugh our asses off and tell the cute newbie to be more intelligent in the future, and usually kick him some isk to lessen the sting. Not much though, and if they're not a cute newbie they probably can expect nothing more than laughter. Maybe put him in a Rifter and drag him off killing idiots in Delve so he learns the important lesson of "I'm mad so THEY must die," where THEY is anyone not blue. (An important life lesson for anyone in EVE.)
If it's another goon scamming a goon we get the stick, cause that's a paddlin' offence. Gently Caressing another Goon is not allowed, unless it's hilarious, at which point it had damn well better not be permanent. But we're big kids, and there are plenty of us (Mittani, for example) who are outright adults, so it usually all works out. And hey, if it doesn't, shootin' blues is fun too.
|

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
259
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 16:21:00 -
[149] - Quote
The Sanbox needs 2x8s to keep all the sand in.
|

HELIC0N ONE
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
33
|
Posted - 2011.11.11 17:12:00 -
[150] - Quote
Morganta wrote:this makes no sense to me. "if given the choice" indicates a knowledge of the fact that scamming happens in EVE, in which case a scam-free channel is a moot point since the entire idea of a scam free channel is to protect those who don't know any better. You'd be surprised at the amount of chatlogs we have of people worrying about scams and then being talked into handing all their crap over anyway. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |