Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:37:00 -
[331] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Saying ganking is hard and requires ingame knollage is bullshit. With bumping, you only need to bump a whale, gathe people when they bother to come in, then do a countdown and shoot.
This is all it requires, ...
I didn't say you said ganking must not be allowed - I was using ganking synonymously with bumping. You have no right to state that, you don't have the faintest idea (well actually only the faintest idea) the system you have to setup to successfully locate, immobilize, execute and loot a gank. Any error in any of the procedures and you have wasted all your time, potentially flopped 1b isk down the drain if the gank goes wrong. This is like exactly like people with no knowledge within software development complaining about bugs in a game and "how ******* difficult can it be to just get it right?". How about you go out and do some freighter ganking, then come back and tell me: 1. That it was easy as **** 2. And how every single freighter you ganked could not just have been insta-webbed and got away from you.
You are evading the issue, lets put it this way, bl maelstrom fleet from some weird reason decide to undock from jita to gank a cfc titan (i know you're not allowed to attack cfc titans but humor me), while you undock a goon fleet of same size comes out and starts bumping the maelstroms, for some reason the maelstroms happen to have a 45 second align time and as such, one goon can keep one maelstrom locked from getting into warp indefinately by bumping said maelstrom (this is how it goes with freighters).
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers? |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:43:00 -
[332] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark.
~creativity~ |

Estrella Sheikh
Apex Inc Carthage Empires
20
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:44:00 -
[333] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Saying ganking is hard and requires ingame knollage is bullshit. With bumping, you only need to bump a whale, gathe people when they bother to come in, then do a countdown and shoot.
This is all it requires, ...
I didn't say you said ganking must not be allowed - I was using ganking synonymously with bumping. You have no right to state that, you don't have the faintest idea (well actually only the faintest idea) the system you have to setup to successfully locate, immobilize, execute and loot a gank. Any error in any of the procedures and you have wasted all your time, potentially flopped 1b isk down the drain if the gank goes wrong. This is like exactly like people with no knowledge within software development complaining about bugs in a game and "how ******* difficult can it be to just get it right?". How about you go out and do some freighter ganking, then come back and tell me: 1. That it was easy as **** 2. And how every single freighter you ganked could not just have been insta-webbed and got away from you. You are evading the issue, lets put it this way, bl maelstrom fleet from some weird reason decide to undock from jita to gank a cfc titan (i know you're not allowed to attack cfc titans but humor me), while you undock a goon fleet of same size comes out and starts bumping the maelstroms, for some reason the maelstroms happen to have a 45 second align time and as such, one goon can keep one maelstrom locked from getting into warp indefinately by bumping said maelstrom (this is how it goes with freighters). Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
o_o have you never heard of HS Undock warp to points?
|

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:47:00 -
[334] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark. ~creativity~
Can't dock when bumped to 200kmk off the station, stop evading the issue. The end result will be the same if you've just jumped through a stargate and start getting bumped.
edit: Estrella , stop evading the issue |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1657
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:50:00 -
[335] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Quote:The problem is that your average fleet stabber can pick a freighter and render it completely unable to act for an indefinitely long period of time, short of the freighter self-destructing. u must be assuming the freighter be afk. in which case, its owner must surely not mind being held indefinitly, since he doesnt even know. and even then the freighter cannot be held indefinitly, as DT kicks in every 24 hours. If the freighter pilot is active however; he can log off or eject, he is in no way a prisoner. seeing as the freighter is not being held for any specific purposes like suicide ganks, he will be allowed to log off safely. Or if it is being held for a purpose within the game, then its being held for a purpose within the game, so thats fine.
Freighter doesn't need to be afk to be bumped forever. Logging off or DT does not allow the freighter to escape. What you are saying here, is that if one person or multiple persons decides to hellcamp a freighter's logoff point in hisec, that this is okay, and the freighter pilot has no recourse but to eject or self destruct in order to escape, or wait out his harassers, potentially forever.
While I have described an extreme situation, certainly, but my point is to illustrate that a limit should exist (and does exist) even if that limit is subjective. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:55:00 -
[336] - Quote
Batelle wrote:
Freighter doesn't need to be afk to be bumped forever. Logging off or DT does not allow the freighter to escape. What you are saying here, is that if one person or multiple persons decides to hellcamp a freighter's logoff point in hisec, that this is okay, and the freighter pilot has no recourse but to eject or self destruct in order to escape, or wait out his harassers, potentially forever.
While I have described an extreme situation, certainly, but my point is to illustrate that a limit should exist (and does exist) even if that limit is subjective.
Problem is, the limit has no effect on freighters as there is no way of escaping the situation and having it occur again later. Only way for the ruling on bumping relating to miner bumpage to have effect on freighters is if attempting to warp away is deemed an escape and consequent bumps to be harrassing. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:56:00 -
[337] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark. ~creativity~ Can't dock when bumped to 200kmk off the station, stop evading the issue. The end result will be the same if you've just jumped through a stargate and start getting bumped. edit: Estrella , stop evading the issue
You're the one avoiding the issue. I just told you. Virtually any freighter is uncatchable with a webbing alt. |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:09:00 -
[338] - Quote
You are not answering the question, that is avoiding the issue. |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1658
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:09:00 -
[339] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Batelle wrote:
Freighter doesn't need to be afk to be bumped forever. Logging off or DT does not allow the freighter to escape. What you are saying here, is that if one person or multiple persons decides to hellcamp a freighter's logoff point in hisec, that this is okay, and the freighter pilot has no recourse but to eject or self destruct in order to escape, or wait out his harassers, potentially forever.
While I have described an extreme situation, certainly, but my point is to illustrate that a limit should exist (and does exist) even if that limit is subjective.
Problem is, the limit has no effect on freighters as there is no way of escaping the situation and having it occur again later. Only way for the ruling on bumping relating to miner bumpage to have effect on freighters is if attempting to warp away is deemed an escape and consequent bumps to be harrassing. But this is another can of worms to open and as such a clear ruling from ccp on how bumping and harrassing relate to freighters in hisec would be needed.
Right, which is why I'm actually completely content to leave bumping mechanics unchanged. But I would appreciate clarity from CCP on the issue. But CCP can't be clear because if they say "its okay up to 20 minutes" then people will start bumping freighters with impunity everywhere. CCP doesn't want to draw a line in the sand because of the affect it would have on player behavior. Thus here, as with many other grey areas, CCP will let you know if you crossed the line (if you're reported), but they won't say much more than that.
Quote:You're the one avoiding the issue. I just told you. Virtually any freighter is uncatchable with a webbing alt. Assessing the effectiveness of webbing alts/friends is useful when considering balance. It is not useful at all however if you're trying to outline what should be considered an exploit or harassment. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:31:00 -
[340] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:You are not answering the question, that is avoiding the issue.
Edit: just to add, you are basicly saying, a freighter needs to always have a webbing alt or it g¦¦e¦¦t¦¦s¦¦ can be ganked (you earlier said you gank empty freighters for testing purposes).
Fixed that for you. Just like a bumping character needs some friends to gank the freighter. The freighter needs someone to make it almost ungankable/uncatchable. |
|

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:32:00 -
[341] - Quote
Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:35:00 -
[342] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something.
Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve".
- But it's nice to see you agree now. |

Cathy Mikakka
Schroedingers Fluffy Kitty Asylum Ravens Misfits
1
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:40:00 -
[343] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something. Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve". - But it's nice to see you agree now. Is 20 minutes too short for you to get your ganking buddies? HTFU? |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:40:00 -
[344] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:You are not answering the question, that is avoiding the issue.
Edit: just to add, you are basicly saying, a freighter needs to always have a webbing alt or it g¦¦e¦¦t¦¦s¦¦ can be ganked (you earlier said you gank empty freighters for testing purposes). Fixed that for you. Just like a bumping character needs some friends to gank the freighter. The freighter needs someone to make it almost ungankable/uncatchable.
Guess you're unable tell us all why it's a great gameplay feature that someone can keep another player indefinately locked from playing the game, while all the time telling us it's needed for your ganks which evidently it is not needed for. Well go on evading the issue.
Bumping a freighter does not require a friend, ganking it ofcourse does but once the freighter is bumped, it can't get out without sacrificing said freighter or having a bunch of pilots lose sec status and ships.
So just stop blathering like a fool or answer the question: Is it a good thing that one player can lock another player from controlling his ship for indefinite time? Is this complete risk aversity something that fits the eve universe?
Edit: Amnzi, i'm not aggreeing with anything, i'm only saying that an answer that relates to freighters is required. |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1659
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:45:00 -
[345] - Quote
Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:You are not answering the question, that is avoiding the issue.
Edit: just to add, you are basicly saying, a freighter needs to always have a webbing alt or it g¦¦e¦¦t¦¦s¦¦ can be ganked (you earlier said you gank empty freighters for testing purposes). Fixed that for you. Just like a bumping character needs some friends to gank the freighter. The freighter needs someone to make it almost ungankable/uncatchable.
You don't have to gank the freighter to render it unusable. How many alts are required to do one thing or another is a question of balance. For questions of harassment/exploitation, you should assume the potential aggressor/violator has multiple accounts at his disposal and the victim has one. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:53:00 -
[346] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Bumping a freighter does not require a friend, .
Yup, it's a 1-to-1 equation. The freighter might be rendered unusable, well there's 1 player devoting his full attention into making that ship unusable. "indefinitely locked from playing the game" is pretty much harassment and not allowed. Don't exaggerate the issue to try and back up your feeble viewpoints please. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:55:00 -
[347] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something. Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve". - But it's nice to see you agree now. Is 20 minutes too short for you to get your ganking buddies? HTFU?
It's plenty of time, but not enough time to pay a ransom. I've had multiple people be "I need to login in and alt and transfer isk" after the 10 min. initial conversation or "hang on, I need to sell some assets".
|

Estrella Sheikh
Apex Inc Carthage Empires
20
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:57:00 -
[348] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark. ~creativity~ Can't dock when bumped to 200kmk off the station, stop evading the issue. The end result will be the same if you've just jumped through a stargate and start getting bumped. edit: Estrella , stop evading the issue
In what world does one undock and is instantly bumped? You're invunerable for 5-10? seconds when you undock from ANNNNNNNNNNNNNNYYYYYYYYYYYYYY station. Initiate an aligned instant undock. Holy jesus you're away.
Also, who the hell can bump you 200km instantly off the undock with a bump? What convoluted crazy hell are you making up in your mind?
I'm really irritated with you putting words in my mouth that were never spoken.
You're so one track minded that literally nobody but you will ever be right in any argument regardless of any logical answer given. It's perfectly Fine that one person can make an effort to block someone from going somewhere, cause that same person can in return do the same thing.
If you don't like the free will, q.q. and biomass. If you're irritated with other peoples intent, Fight them bro. If you want to complain so hard that this non-issue is brought to their attention JUST so they can tell you bumping is working as intended for you to then curse ccp and threaten to unsub without ever unsubbing and wallowing in your ****** quiet corner. By all means, go crazy.
You're not stupid, you're ignorant. |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:58:00 -
[349] - Quote
Dear ammzi, there is no time limit you idiot. Stop being dumb. For it to become harrassment, you need to be able to get away. That is the ccp ruling. And what is indefinite time in the end, is it me saying "you're stuck here forever" or is it enough if i say "you're stuck till my bro's come back from china to gank you", or is keeping someone thisway for 5 minutes enough already ?
Dear estrella, you fail to see the point, and are trying to catch straws. The issue is, would endless bumping be ok even if it means a whole fleet of battleships is tied down unable to shoot the bumpers without losing ships themselves. Wether they just undock from a station, jump through gate or what ever is irrelevant which would've been obvious to you from the start if you'd have a brain. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:04:00 -
[350] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Dear ammzi, there is no time limit you idiot. Stop being dumb. For it to become harrassment, you need to be able to get away. That is the ccp ruling. And what is indefinite time in the end, is it me saying "you're stuck here forever" or is it enough if i say "you're stuck till my bro's come back from china to gank you", or is keeping someone thisway for 5 minutes enough already ?
I didn't say there was a time limit you useless single-cellular minded organism. I just told you - freighters can be webbed into warp and avoid being bumped. THAT was their chance at getting away. So what - pointing someone in nullsec until downtime is an exploit because they can't get away? Any freighter being bumped had their shot at getting away and they dropped it. |
|

JetStream Drenard
EVE University Ivy League
5
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:09:00 -
[351] - Quote
******* Hell Motoko! I am gonna track you down and bump you into tears of rage if you dont calm down and be civilized. Its just a GAME. If you dont like it, Contract me your stuff, then transfer me all your isk, then uninstall. Seriously! |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:15:00 -
[352] - Quote
Red Frog are cool about this and know how to avoid ganks. They hardly become targets and run one of the most famous business' in EVE. Then there's these people who come from cookie-on-a-plate-for-you games, who don't have sufficient ingame knowledge to solve their issues and try to make CCP fix their "problems" for them.
THEN when the solution to their problem is explained to them they pout, cross their arms and exclaim things such as "unfairness" or put their fingers in their ears while exaggerating their difficulties to make the discussion completely pointless and mindnumbing till everyone just gives up, starts shitting the thread so that ISD/CCP come in and have to clean it up and/or lock the thread. Give it a few weeks and another one will pop up, rinse & repeat.
All we can do is hope that CCP never listens to them.
|

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16692
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:17:00 -
[353] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something. Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve". - But it's nice to see you agree now. Is 20 minutes too short for you to get your ganking buddies? HTFU? I thought you didn't like the 'Bring friends' attitude? I mean hell, it's an MMO right? What would the game be turning into with such a thought?
GM Karidor wrote:CCP considers the act of bumping a normal game mechanic, and does not class the bumping of another playerGÇÖs ship as an exploit. Just in case you missed it.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:17:00 -
[354] - Quote
umm i can just shoot who ever is pointing me in nullsec... can't do that in highsec, the bumpers not pointing remember? he's not aggressing, get it in your thick skull, gankers aggress and can be shot, bumpers can not be.
And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic, freighters can't be designed around same corp alts webbing them, that is imbalanced and poor design. It's as stupid as your inability to answer to my question still.
And like you said some posts ago, you are using bumping to force ransoms, so you are bumping said target forever until they pay. This is completely idiotic and has no counter to it. (webbing beforehand doesn't counter this as you're, you know, bumbed) |

Jamir Von Lietuva
LDK Sorry We're In Your Space Eh
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:20:00 -
[355] - Quote
another buff to pirat |

JetStream Drenard
EVE University Ivy League
8
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:21:00 -
[356] - Quote
http://i.imgur.com/NZSFuTF.jpg |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1679
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:21:00 -
[357] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic,
IT'S NOT NATURAL GUYS. PLEASE NERF IT - I AM A VEGAN AND IT OFFENDS ME. |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16692
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:27:00 -
[358] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic, freighters can't be designed around same corp alts webbing them, that is imbalanced and poor design. It's as stupid as your inability to answer to my question still. What you mean is that your NPC freighter pilot designed to avoid war decs, cannot be webbed without punishment. Shame that, but then NPC corps do have some disadvantages. 
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Motoko Innocentius
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:31:00 -
[359] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic, freighters can't be designed around same corp alts webbing them, that is imbalanced and poor design. It's as stupid as your inability to answer to my question still. What you mean is that your NPC freighter pilot designed to avoid war decs, cannot be webbed without punishment. Shame that, but then NPC corps do have some disadvantages. 
Thanks for making this clear, can't argue with webs when they can't be used eh. Whats the disadvantage for an npc corp bumper btw? |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16692
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:37:00 -
[360] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Mag's wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic, freighters can't be designed around same corp alts webbing them, that is imbalanced and poor design. It's as stupid as your inability to answer to my question still. What you mean is that your NPC freighter pilot designed to avoid war decs, cannot be webbed without punishment. Shame that, but then NPC corps do have some disadvantages.  Thanks for making this clear, can't argue with webs when they can't be used eh. Whats the disadvantage for an npc corp bumper btw? They have the same disadvantages, it's just a matter of degrees. But disadvantages are what they are and to gain the advantage of no war dec, you have gained the problem of no web without punishment.
Maybe it's time to start a player corp and use your freighter alts in that with webbers? Or is that far too much to ask?
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |