TL:DR Highsec is risk free aside from wardecs, feel free to trust anyone, fleet anyone, rep anyone, farm anything, and autopilot around the land of rainbows and hugs.

CCP have now nerfed the old wardecced fleet members, remote repping, contracts and all other transactions, and introduced iskcursions. Tell me, where is the harsh and unforgiving part of this game again? Because i'm pretty sure it's supposed to be everywhere.

And as for the trolls claiming that ganking shouldn't be risk free and that griefers are running a one-sided argument, where is the risk that you guys are taking now? What risk is justifying that ridiculous income from incursions? Do you think you are at risk with 3 logis repping you? Do you think that maybe after running hundreds of sites a day that you might get the next one wrong and hit a trigger? Yes that does sound very dangerous, perhaps we should dock up until ccp can help us out with those nasty sanshas too.
Gankers don't need a risk, because in suicide ganking, you're GUARANTEED to lose the ship. You lose ships, isk, modules, and sec status. While the gankee only loses a ship.
You talk about risk free, why should you waltz around in pimp ships with pimp fits, disregarding any thought of risk when you're surrounded by people with a lot less to lose than you have? Would you walk around dark city allyways with your big old platinum chain and rolex hanging out of your shirt? If you do, then you deserve to get them taken from you.

It may be a small effort to rob you of your goodies, but it is an even smaller effort for you to protect them, you just don't do it because it would be inconvenient for you.

why was slavery great and promoted by leaders, be it religious or "state" until 1865.

hmm doesnt matter.

First you cry EVE is overlooked.

Then you cry things happens to EVE.

a small change has been made to game mechanics in regarding criminal flags and-áhow they are inherited in high security space. If a pilot-áis remote repairing, or otherwise assisting, another pilot who commits a criminal act then the repair module will now disengage. In order to continue repairs the module will need to be restarted and a message will appear warning of the criminal flag and possible consequences.


To benefit the EVE community at large,

That's a bit of a ******* stretch don't you think CCP?
I mean, I know your interpretation of this rings true, but if you apply it instead to the current community, it's just another kick in the bollocks.

Incursions are already milking so much isk normal game play can't compete, and now you give them even more.... as if you hadn't made enough to concessions to lazy casuals already.

I knew the bear pirate tears would start flowing eventually. Didn't expect for it to have almost a day of lag. What, did you just log in and find out your golden ticket was gone?

You think you are the first to think and say such nonsense, but you're not, you're lost in a sea of weaklings who think they're very clever.

You think you are the first to think and say such nonsense, but you're not, you're lost in a sea of weaklings who think they're very clever.

why u so mad bro?
u need a hug.
come're.

What your incessant whines and tears reduce to you wanting people to HTFU so that you don't have to.

You're bitching about not being able to use a loophole mechanic to aid you in padding your sadistic self-esteem.

Its just best to let this void fall into the eternal abyss, but then again we technically are in space where no one can hear you scream XD... but If its what I think it is thats going on, we need to just say our piece and move along, otherwise the blood spilt here will bring the hounds thirsting for more.

What your incessant whines and tears reduce to you wanting people to HTFU so that you don't have to.

You're bitching about not being able to use a loophole mechanic to aid you in padding your sadistic self-esteem.

See this is the crux of the issue you're neither able nor willing to grasp. It's got nothing to do with what I do, it's got everything to do with maintaining an exciting, irrational and often ludicrous gaming experience at the specific expense of safe, easy gold fountains.

I know I just wasted another sentence on your inept, twisted, unthoughtful, easily confused and sub par brain, but maybe somebody who isn't a waste of precious resource will pick it up and understand it. It's not for you. You are just meat.

Or just hide her posts so you don't have to read any of the crying.

Why did Eve NOT need this "EXPLOIT OMG CAN U BELIEVE HAXOR" "mechanic" "hole" patching up until 2011?

I know I just wasted another sentence on your inept, twisted, unthoughtful, easily confused and sub par brain, but maybe somebody who isn't a waste of precious resource will pick it up and understand it. It's not for you. You are just meat.

bad enough when you try opening those legs of yours that bats fly out and green ooze drips out

if only there was a way for it to just stablize long enough for intellegence to show and so that players both new and old can say "there are some real smart people out there, i should be more like them"

^ This.

1. Player A is repping player B
2. Player B steals from his friend player C
3. Player C gains aggression rights towards player A without player A receiving a warning, being informed or given the option to step out
4. Player C gets a risk free kill

In short, we fully endorse people blowing up space ships, but you should always have control over whether you receive an aggression flag or not. This is why can flipping is ok, but why we plugged this particular hole; there was no warning, defense or precautions you could take to combat this tactic, except by not participating in a huge feature of the game.

So you're saying that before this change player A was already getting a warning if player B had stolen from his friend player C 5 minutes ago and player A started repping player B? You're saying that Slimy Worm actually had to show up on grid personally (on his griefing main) to do the can-flipping in the middle of an Incursion site?

If that's true, then I stand corrected. But I seriously doubt Paul Clavet (of My Loot, Your Tears) is that stupid.

If it's not true, then put the paste down and get back to work.

Answering a question that wasn't asked.

That's burns my ass, like a 3' flame.

Before the change, if I can-flip someone and a minute later someone else activates a remote rep module on me, did he get a pop-up warning or not?

This guy says no.

If the correct answer is yes, I stand corrected. If the correct answer is no, then I've been right all along. I've never played station games so I defer to the wisdom of the mouth-breathing experts of that art.

How about Tranquility for Eve.
Singularity for testing.
Multiplicity for CCP testing.
and Blizzard for Incursions?

I think this would just about suit every last subscriber really.

Yes, you would get a warning. The warning would only happen when you start the rep. If the rep was already running you'd get no warning. Why are people having such a hard time with this?