Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Platypus King
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 18:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
RLML and HMLs have come and gone!
However I assure you this isn't that kind of thread.
It is actually a thread about caldari utility or lack thereof in the cruiser class.
RLML did a lot of damage to everything but we all know those changes. The after affect is cruisers without utility highs or a drone bay capable of tickling an interceptor. I am in belief leaving medium sized missiles as is would be acceptable if there was a consideration for a better drone bay on caracal hulls (including cerb). If you look at other cruisers just about all of them have a way to get a scram frigate off of them except the maller, moa(which is getting a significant speed and cap buff anyways) but most importantly the caracal!
The flagship hull for caldari. Neutless and rocking a massive 30ish dps from warriors. If we look at minmatar, gallente and even Amarr you find tools for ridding you of rude frigates. Neuts, drones, and applicable damage in form of tracking and transversal manipulation.
Assuming the caracal is ham fit which is viable pvp. You could argue it already does too much dps but fitting is very tight and your tank is nothing to be proud of like with the maller, which is the only other ship I believe has no protection from a single good frigate.
The point I am making in this exaggerated post is what really irks me isn't bad ham application on frigs or RLML burst mode. It is I fact the drone bay and utility lacking line of ships.
So... dear Abby
Is it fair the weapon system with the least dps to frigs has no drones or neut to remove a malediction scram?
From cautious caracal |

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire
535
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Platypus King wrote: Is it fair the weapon system with the least dps to frigs has no drones or neut to remove a malediction scram?
Yes, it is! Just think about it: Even the arguably best cruisers (thorax/vexor/omen) can't do jack **** against ceptors on their own either. They have no utility highs (the vexor got some, but they'll be fitted with guns just as you never heard of EC-300s apparently), and even suffer from terrible application issues compared to the caracool.
Also, if you feel that you really need that neut, just drop a launcher for one! Or fill your drone bay with ECs! Or fit your caracal with web+scram.
Else, you'll get probably the same response the guy who asked why dreadnoughts don't have small gun batteries to defend against Dictors got: A mean, sarcastic one. "I honestly thought I was in lowsec"
Moving pictures |

Batelle
HOMELE55
2124
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
ham caracal should have a web Anything you would be able to hit with a medium neut you can web "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Platypus King
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gallente have room in mids for dual web scram plus tank in lows. And full flights of drones. I mean 4 miss is plenty when you've got a nice base speed and low slot tank layout
@guywhothinks2ec300sisgoodidea First off 2 ec 300s is not an effective strategy. Web scram on solo caracal puts you in web scram range of every cruiser that already has a better tank. In sort it's death. Long Point scram takes better advantage of ham range.
@batelle And about the malediction being in neut or web range a webbed malediction will take about 100 dps to 120 dps from drones and hams depending on fit. The malediction successfully tanks 150 dps until SAAR reload. If you had hams and. 5 warriors it would only bump dps to 150-170 which is just enough with OH and crash to force him off or make screaming you a mistake.
The only real reason I included neuts in this thread is minmatar tracking and dps is low but has benefit of drones and medium neut.
It should be noted the change I want is only 50 dps at max skills. |

Batelle
HOMELE55
2125
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
Platypus King wrote: @batelle And about the malediction being in neut or web range a webbed malediction will take about 100 dps to 120 dps from drones and hams depending on fit. The malediction successfully tanks 150 dps until SAAR reload.
Sounds fine to me. No change necessary. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Platypus King
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Quality posts about ec300s and 30 dps to un webbed ceptors being acceptable. |

Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
253
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Whereas quality posts about the best (even after the nerf) T1 anti-frig cruiser (RLM Caracal) being unable to kill an intie are acceptable? |

Platypus King
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 19:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bertrand Butler wrote:Whereas quality posts about the best (even after the nerf) T1 anti-frig cruiser being unable to kill an intie are acceptable?
RLML are best for that definitely. But if you want to do pvp that involves more than one target hams are the better choice. All of stats in this thread will be with hams and won't be about changing hams application or reverting RLML to old style play. What this is about is the shrinking engagement profile in relation to balance. The ham caracals engagement profile is simply other cruisers. But nothing with equivalent range. Don't even try fighting a frig or two. 5 warriors on caracal is not a revolutionary change hell the bellicose has plenty of drone room!
An argument against this idea isn't use RLML. Heretic does more dps than RLML caracal but it's not even about that. It's about the race with the smallest drone bay. |

Jonas Staal
Interstellar Booty Hunters
58
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 08:58:00 -
[9] - Quote
Platypus King wrote:Bertrand Butler wrote:Whereas quality posts about the best (even after the nerf) T1 anti-frig cruiser being unable to kill an intie are acceptable? RLML are best for that definitely. But if you want to do pvp that involves more than one target hams are the better choice.
Sounds like you have a decent choice there. |

Odithia
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 09:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
Platypus King wrote:Bertrand Butler wrote:Whereas quality posts about the best (even after the nerf) T1 anti-frig cruiser being unable to kill an intie are acceptable? RLML are best for that definitely. But if you want to do pvp that involves more than one target hams are the better choice. All of stats in this thread will be with hams and won't be about changing hams application or reverting RLML to old style play. What this is about is the shrinking engagement profile in relation to balance. The ham caracals engagement profile is simply other cruisers. But nothing with equivalent range. Don't even try fighting a frig or two. 5 warriors on caracal is not a revolutionary change hell the bellicose has plenty of drone room! An argument against this idea isn't use RLML. Heretic does more dps than RLML caracal but it's not even about that. It's about the race with the smallest drone bay. If you want missiles and Drones, fly a Sacrilege. Won't be able to kite the hell out of every other cruisers though.
|
|

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire
535
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 09:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
Platypus King wrote:Gallente have room in mids for dual web scram plus tank in lows. And full flights of drones. I mean 4 miss is plenty when you've got a nice base speed and low slot tank layout
@guywhothinks2ec300sisgoodidea First off 2 ec 300s is not an effective strategy. Web scram on solo caracal puts you in web scram range of every cruiser that already has a better tank. In sort it's death. Long Point web takes better advantage of ham range.
How can you only fit one web? If you're only fitting to take on frigs, you can even do an AAR-fit with lots of free mids for tackle - or you could fly single-lSE+DCU and go dualweb. It doesn't matter what is good to fit in general. If you want to take on frigs with any cruiser, you better fit for it. People run their thoraxes into null with dualrep, dualprop, a scram only - so they can take on cruisers, battlecruisers, battleships - but hardly frigates or tanked ceptors. Others are taking their active vexors in there, no AB but full tackle - their engagement profile is even smaller than your caracal's. People run dualprop SFIs around, possibly one of the most dangerous ships for poorly piloted frigates, yet they die to a single dramiel. Either make compromises and fit your ship for what you want to do, or simply don't complain that the ship you fly really can't do everything at once.
Else, like the above said: Fighting frigates? Use rapid lights. Don't be a baddie and stick to HAMs for that job.
"I honestly thought I was in lowsec"
Moving pictures |

Brutor Trash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 05:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
TLDR: GO DIE IN A FIRE LOL RIP RLML
(UNLESS YOU FLY THEM IN A GROUP, THEN YOU WILL MASSACRE THEIR WHOLE FLEET UNLIKE EVER BEFORE WITH DPS BUFF) |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
282
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 14:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
In my opinion the problem with Caldari is the poor damage application for heavy missiles. Firgate and Battleship sized launchers are in a good place. Cruiser sized launchers though ...
Some drones would be nice too, but I can live without. |

Hrett
Justified Chaos
357
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 17:28:00 -
[14] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:In my opinion the problem with Caldari is the poor damage application for heavy missiles. Firgate and Battleship sized launchers are in a good place. Cruiser sized launchers though ...
Some drones would be nice too, but I can live without.
People keep saying this, but I have been 4 shot by in an AB + tanked frig by rhmls recently, and it wasnt because i was sitting still or webbed or painted. Not being a contrarian, but where is the evidence/math on this?
And as someone said earlier - a full flight of bnused light drones dont do **** against a ceptor.
The caracal is an extremely strong ship - and the moa will be soon too.
I'm probably typing on an iPad, which means the auto-correct is silly and fixing typos is a pain. I ain't fixing them. |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
284
|
Posted - 2014.03.08 18:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
RHML are a BS sized turret and the Moa doesn't use launchers. The Caracal is average compared to the other cruisers. There are definitely better choices out there. |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
302
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 09:33:00 -
[16] - Quote
Caldari had their time in the sun. First the drake + 100MN tengu, then the RLML Nosprey, Caracal, Cerb. However after all of the sledge hammer nerfs to the drake, RLML's and the complete lack of missile damage application mods, and refusal to rework the missile damage application formula- you now have a neutered weapon system, and race. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10320
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 10:41:00 -
[17] - Quote
People getting mad over not having an I win button.
Caracal is a great ship. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
1139
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 10:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:There's a huge difference in damage application of heavy missiles vs a ABing or a MWDing target. The increase in speed is directly proportional to the amount of applied damage.
and to the target's sig radius.  |

Gregor Parud
289
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 13:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:People getting mad over not having an I win button.
Caracal is a great ship.
This really, also people are still stuck in old memes about what a ship is for and how it was/should be used. Stuff got changed, adapt. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 13:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
I fail to see whats the whining on about, an internet fitted caracal with RLML II's and precision missiles loaded does 180 dps versus an ab malediction with speed of 1.9k and 150 dps to a mwd malediction with speed of 5.2k. But we are talking about a t1 cruiser taking on a t2 frig, when we go for example to usage of a t2 cruiser variation of caracal named cerberus numbers rise to 215 dps to a mwd malediction and 247 dps to an ab malediction which is quite a lot. We are talking about applicable dps. Not to mention the 31km range of caracal and 47.5km range of cerberus with precision missiles loaded. Would really love to hear your opinion on ability to hit an interceptor with scorch lasers or railgun thorax. With fury missiles they apply full damage to cruiser sized ships 409 caracal to a 614 cerberus, with reloads that falls to 240 and 358 with 30 and 40km range. |
|

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
302
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 14:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:I fail to see whats the whining on about, an internet fitted caracal with RLML II's and precision missiles loaded does 180 dps versus an ab malediction with speed of 1.9k and 150 dps to a mwd malediction with speed of 5.2k. But we are talking about a t1 cruiser taking on a t2 frig, when we go for example to usage of a t2 cruiser variation of caracal named cerberus numbers rise to 215 dps to a mwd malediction and 247 dps to an ab malediction which is quite a lot. We are talking about applicable dps. Not to mention the 31km range of caracal and 47.5km range of cerberus with precision missiles loaded. Would really love to hear your opinion on ability to hit an interceptor with scorch lasers or railgun thorax. With fury missiles they apply full damage to cruiser sized ships 409 caracal to a 614 cerberus, with reloads that falls to 240 and 358 with 30 and 40km range.
My heretic, can fight- and kill an RLML caracal. I have done it on many occasions. Maybe its just me, but ceratinly a cruiser fit to kill frigs.... should be able to kill them? Its pretty sad what the current state of the caracal / all missile ships save 2 are currently. Cut the **** about 'adapting', you don't PvP and have no idea what you are talking about. THere is no 'adapt' in regards to missile use in the current meta. Adapting, is simply not using the weapon system / hulls anymore- which is a **** poor choice. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 15:37:00 -
[22] - Quote
Again I fail to see why people are comparing and boasting around killing a t1 cruiser with a t2 ship, this one not even being a frig but a t2 dessy. Maybe you are just a better pilot than the counter player, you had a fit designed to take on such a target while he might have not, lots of factors could sway in every way but I would like to ask you to go up against a cerberus and tell us how it goes for you. Not to mention that you took down a ship that is 5x cheaper hull than yours. Not to mention the differences in skill, implants and other factors that also are a huge impact in fights.
Edit
Please go and fight in a t1 frig vs a RLML caracal of apropriate skills and tell us how it goes for you. |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
302
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 15:58:00 -
[23] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:Again I fail to see why people are comparing and boasting around killing a t1 cruiser with a t2 ship, this one not even being a frig but a t2 dessy. Maybe you are just a better pilot than the counter player, you had a fit designed to take on such a target while he might have not, lots of factors could sway in every way but I would like to ask you to go up against a cerberus and tell us how it goes for you. Not to mention that you took down a ship that is 5x cheaper hull than yours. Not to mention the differences in skill, implants and other factors that also are a huge impact in fights.
Edit
Please go and fight in a t1 frig vs a RLML caracal of apropriate skills and tell us how it goes for you.
The same horrible argument.
T2 vs T1 is irrelevant. It doesn't matter when you are comparing ships- not in the slightest. As each ship in a T1 / T2 class is designed to do something different. The RLML caracal is desgined to kill light targets. The fact that it cannot kill AF's / Intys, and will die to a heretic 1v1 is a sign that something is wrong.
I seriously can't believe you are trying to justify your argument by saying 'there are many factors to a PvP engagement..' Well no ****. Welcome to eve. At the end of the day, an anti-support platform should be able to do its primary job, effectively and easily. IE. A curse when it comes to neuting, or a dictor when it comes to tossing bubbles. Yet here, we have a ship that is completely failing in its role. Something is wrong with that, and it is a glaring problem. |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 15:59:00 -
[24] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:I fail to see whats the whining on about, an internet fitted caracal with RLML II's and precision missiles loaded does 180 dps versus an ab malediction with speed of 1.9k and 150 dps to a mwd malediction with speed of 5.2k. But we are talking about a t1 cruiser taking on a t2 frig, when we go for example to usage of a t2 cruiser variation of caracal named cerberus numbers rise to 215 dps to a mwd malediction and 247 dps to an ab malediction which is quite a lot. We are talking about applicable dps. Not to mention the 31km range of caracal and 47.5km range of cerberus with precision missiles loaded. Would really love to hear your opinion on ability to hit an interceptor with scorch lasers or railgun thorax. With fury missiles they apply full damage to cruiser sized ships 409 caracal to a 614 cerberus, with reloads that falls to 240 and 358 with 30 and 40km range.
This is not at all accurate. You are also taking a system specifically designed against frigates against a long range system. Following that logic the only thing that compares to a RailRax is a HM Caracal, which will do a whooping 10-13 DPS on a TP'd, MWDing Malediction
I've just put this in PYFA.
Let's go a little crazy and assume you have a TP and 3 BCUs AB -> 190 dps MWD ->110 dps
Now let's take an Omen (Web and Heat Sinks) AB/MWD -> up to and over 500 dps (depending on transversal)
A Thorax with Null will do even better.
Let's be more realistic though. No one flies around with precision lights loaded already, people fly around with CN scourge loaded. In your example, I see the Maledication, I swap to precisions (Since with CN Scourge, I do 60 dps) while the Malediction already gets 35 seconds of free shooting time on me. Reload over yay, half my shields are gone. Now I don't know if you've actually looked this up, but at 110dps an entire load of my RLML (18 volleys) cannot kill a 200mm plated Maledication (which is the majority of them). You just don't have enough damage in 1 clip to kill him before having to reload again.
The Malediction gets almost 2 minutes of unload time, which is more than enough to kill a buffer tanked Caracal.
People generally don't swap ammo much, because it of the 35sec reload timer. That's half your shields gone already. You will be using CN Scourge, so realistically you're more looking at 55-60dps on a MWDing, TP'd Maledication. That means depending on skill, he can take a whooping 2 full clips of RLMLs.
At least you're not completely ignorant, and I see you got the 409dps from Scourge Furies (which do 25dps on our Malediction above). So here I am, flying around with my Precision missiles, and I see our Omen from above there. Sweet, I change to Fury missiles ... oh no. I've died before I finished reloading. :(
Let's say I was flying with CN Scourge. I do about 330dps on a cruiser. Not too shabby. Meanwhile, my buddy in the Thorax is cranking out 450-500 and the Omen itself is pushing 480-520. Unfortunately though, after about 30 seconds of shooting, I'm dry. Reload time ... On the Omen it turns out, I did about 30% armor damage. Good stuff. Let's just hope he can't actually repair in that 35 second gap of me not doing damage and let's hope I manage to somehow stay alive in that 35 second gap as wel.
So yea, you're missing a few things there. Quite a few actually. One of them possibly is a clue. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 16:11:00 -
[25] - Quote
As said please go fight a well fitted cerberus with the same amount of flying skills in it as you have in your heretic and tell us the result. |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 16:23:00 -
[26] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:As said please go fight a well fitted cerberus with the same amount of flying skills in it as you have in your heretic and tell us the result. You do realise that in 1 clip the Cerb cannot kill a Heretic and if the Heretic has a SAAR, it will never kill it as long as it has paste (which it can just reload when the Cerb starts its 35sec reload cycle). The Heretic will however destroy a buffer tanked Cerb, given enough time. |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
302
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 16:27:00 -
[27] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:As said please go fight a well fitted cerberus with the same amount of flying skills in it as you have in your heretic and tell us the result.
And there we have it ladies and gentleman, the cop out, a TKO- the surrender. You have nothing, stop wasting forum space with your uninformed musings. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 16:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
This is not at all accurate. You are also taking a system specifically designed against frigates against a long range system. Following that logic the only thing that compares to a RailRax is a HM Caracal, which will do a whooping 10-13 DPS on a TP'd, MWDing Malediction
I've just put this in PYFA.
Let's go a little crazy and assume you have a TP and 3 BCUs AB -> 190 dps MWD ->110 dps
Now let's take an Omen (Web and Heat Sinks) AB/MWD -> up to and over 500 dps (depending on transversal)
A Thorax with Null will do even better.
Let's be more realistic though. No one flies around with precision lights loaded already, people fly around with CN scourge loaded. In your example, I see the Maledication, I swap to precisions (Since with CN Scourge, I do 60 dps) while the Malediction already gets 35 seconds of free shooting time on me. Reload over yay, half my shields are gone. Now I don't know if you've actually looked this up, but at 110dps an entire load of my RLML (18 volleys) cannot kill a 200mm plated Maledication (which is the majority of them). You just don't have enough damage in 1 clip to kill him before having to reload again.
The Malediction gets almost 2 minutes of unload time, which is more than enough to kill a buffer tanked Caracal.
People generally don't swap ammo much, because it of the 35sec reload timer. That's half your shields gone already. You will be using CN Scourge, so realistically you're more looking at 55-60dps on a MWDing, TP'd Maledication. That means depending on skill, he can take a whooping 2 full clips of RLMLs.
At least you're not completely ignorant, and I see you got the 409dps from Scourge Furies (which do 25dps on our Malediction above). So here I am, flying around with my Precision missiles, and I see our Omen from above there. Sweet, I change to Fury missiles ... oh no. I've died before I finished reloading. :(
Let's say I was flying with CN Scourge. I do about 330dps on a cruiser. Not too shabby. Meanwhile, my buddy in the Thorax is cranking out 450-500 and the Omen itself is pushing 480-520. Unfortunately though, after about 30 seconds of shooting, I'm dry. Reload time ... On the Omen it turns out, I did about 30% armor damage. Good stuff. Let's just hope he can't actually repair in that 35 second gap of me not doing damage and let's hope I manage to somehow stay alive in that 35 second gap as wel.
I don't think you realise but in ideal circumstances, you are doing that RLML dps for about 40 seconds. Then you have 35 seconds of reload time. With CN Scourge, the absolute maximum you can get out of that clip of missiles, is 14850 raw dps. Once you deduct target resistances, tranversals, sig radii there isn't really a whole lot left. You talk about Caracal DPS as if it has constant up time. If anything you should divide by 2, since half of the time it's reloading. If you cannot blap something with your initial 3-5K burst, in the first 40 seconds, you are done. And please have a look at the hit points of most frigate and cruiser fits. You'll be surprised.
So yea, you're missing a few things there. Quite a few actually.[/quote]
Light missiles are a long range equivalent of small missile launchers so asking for a comparison with other long range medium weapons is valid.
Concerning the other part of your argument it is all true, the reload times, not having precision fitted and the rest are all valid points. However you are forgetting some other issues that are valid and should be considered, you do not require cap to shoot, traversal and sig doesn't matter at all cause you will be hit for full damage when it comes to cruiser size, ability to chose the right ammo against the ships weakest rez and also the 30km range of your weapons.
While omen and thorax both require cap to shoot, omen does that damage up to 10km and with scorch up to 20km, if omen is active tank fitted then it will burn trough its cap even sooner if it is a buffer tank then you can be kited, your guns are affected by sig and traversal. Same thing goes for thorax but he has that much dps up to 3k km and cant even shoot past 10km and also requires cap for its active tank which will result in faster cap burning and if you are an active tank you can be kited and freely disengaged.
They all have their pro's and con's caracal is good at its own thing and RLML's are also good for their own role and they are not at all underpowered if used properly and with a right tactic.
|

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:Concerning the other part of your argument it is all true, the reload times, not having precision fitted and the rest are all valid points. However you are forgetting some other issues that are valid and should be considered, you do not require cap to shoot, traversal and sig doesn't matter at all cause you will be hit for full damage when it comes to cruiser size, ability to chose the right ammo against the ships weakest rez and also the 30km range of your weapons.
While omen and thorax both require cap to shoot, omen does that damage up to 10km and with scorch up to 20km, if omen is active tank fitted then it will burn trough its cap even sooner if it is a buffer tank then you can be kited, your guns are affected by sig and traversal. Same thing goes for thorax but he has that much dps up to 3k km and cant even shoot past 10km and also requires cap for its active tank which will result in faster cap burning and if you are an active tank you can be kited and freely disengaged.
They all have their pro's and con's caracal is good at its own thing and RLML's are also good for their own role and they are not at all underpowered if used properly and with a right tactic. What the hell are small missile launchers? The medium sized long range launcher is the Heavy Missile launcher. The medium sized sized short range high, damage launcher, is the RLML. Light missiles themselves, are actually a frigate sized weapon system.
In as good as all situations having an effective range over your point range is pretty useless, since at that point the target will just warp off. Both Omens and Raxs can fit cap boosters, in fact they are pretty standard these days. Both are also faster than a Caracal. Both also do almost twice the damage and don't actually have to worry about 35 second reload times, every 40 seconds.
I think you also missed the point above where I just indicated that a frigate as long as it has some sort of tank, will kill a solo RLML Caracal. The only situation in which RLML Caracals are OK, is in small gang engagements. 4-5 shooting the same frigate will probably kill 2-3. But then everyone gets to do a 35 second reload round all together. You better hope there isn't much left on the field or you're going to take some losses there.
At the same time, you could have just taken 4-5 Vexors and your gang composition would have been so much better. You even got RRs sorted, when flying Vexors. Hell, even a gang of rail Moas would have been better. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:09:00 -
[30] - Quote
Chessur wrote:Eyana Starstruck wrote:As said please go fight a well fitted cerberus with the same amount of flying skills in it as you have in your heretic and tell us the result. And there we have it ladies and gentleman, the cop out, a TKO- the surrender. You have nothing, stop wasting forum space with your uninformed musings.
Please refrain from such comments and personal insults targeted at the person with whom you do not share the same opinion, cause to any cultured and well mannered group you will just look silly and they will ignore you like I plan on doing. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |