| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:Please refrain from such comments and personal insults targeted at the person with whom you do not share the same opinion, cause to any cultured and well mannered group you will just look silly and they will ignore you like I plan on doing. On the other hand that's just what it is. An Opinion. Your opinion of the Caracal can be whatever you want it to be. That doesn't take away the fact that RLML and arguably the Caldari ships as they are the ones that fit them most prominently, need some attention.
If we get back to the original topic here though, the Caldari cruiser line, I would go as far as saying they are alright. The problem is that half of them have no decent weapon system to fit. There's really no decent medium missile system.
And sure you can fly a Caracal fit with whatever launcher you want, it's just not as good as other cruisers. There are always alternatives. Sure the Caracal can do damage, just not as much as other cruisers. And sure it tanks, just not as well as others. It kites too, but just not as good as others. In a game where everyone min/maxes all the time, you want to fly the best. An average ship, with below average weapons just doesn't cut it, unless you like getting blown up. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:What the hell are small missile launchers? The medium sized long range launcher is the Heavy Missile launcher. The medium sized sized short range high, damage launcher, is the RLML. Light missiles themselves, are actually a frigate sized weapon system.
In as good as all situations having an effective range over your point range is pretty useless, since at that point the target will just warp off. Both Omens and Raxs can fit cap boosters, in fact they are pretty standard these days. Both are also faster than a Caracal. Both also do almost twice the damage and don't actually have to worry about 35 second reload times, every 40 seconds.
I think you also missed the point above where I just indicated that a frigate as long as it has some sort of tank, will kill a solo RLML Caracal. The only situation in which RLML Caracals are OK, is in small gang engagements. 4-5 shooting the same frigate will probably kill 2-3. But then everyone gets to do a 35 second reload round all together. You better hope there isn't much left on the field or you're going to take some losses there.
At the same time, you could have just taken 4-5 Vexors and your gang composition would have been so much better. You even got RRs sorted, when flying Vexors. Hell, even a gang of rail Moas would have been better.
If RLML with light missies can reach to 40km range doesn't that make it a long range weapon or far reaching weapon whatever you like?
You do not have the range on both omen and thorax to reach the caracal in that 24km point range if he kites you correctly, especially thorax.
Yes they can both fit for cap boosters but if they field buffer tank they are slower than the caracal and caracal can always disengage, if they are active tanked and a pilot fits an overdrive injector on a caracal then not even an active tanked omen or thorax can catch you and you can always disengage and keep them in your point range.
I never said that there aren't better options than a caracal for that kind of warfare but it is not at all that underpowered just that if used correctly and with right tactic they are fully capable of being effective.
|

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:49:00 -
[33] - Quote
Aivo Dresden wrote:Eyana Starstruck wrote:Please refrain from such comments and personal insults targeted at the person with whom you do not share the same opinion, cause to any cultured and well mannered group you will just look silly and they will ignore you like I plan on doing. On the other hand that's just what it is. An Opinion. Your opinion of the Caracal can be whatever you want it to be. That doesn't take away the fact that RLML and arguably the Caldari ships as they are the ones that fit them most prominently, need some attention. If we get back to the original topic here though, the Caldari cruiser line, I would go as far as saying they are alright. The problem is that half of them have no decent weapon system to fit. There's really no decent medium missile system. And sure you can fly a Caracal fit with whatever launcher you want, it's just not as good as other cruisers. There are always alternatives. Sure the Caracal can do damage, just not as much as other cruisers. And sure it tanks, just not as well as others. It kites too, but just not as good as others. In a game where everyone min/maxes all the time, you want to fly the best. An average ship, with below average weapons just doesn't cut it, unless you like getting blown up.
Ships like omen and thorax are forced into em/therm and kin/therm type damage and can't change it, can be neuted out thus their dps falls to 0, tracking disrupted and depend on sig and traversal, while caracal can shoot even if neuted out, can select damage type and have bigger range than most of the other cruisers, doesn't care about weapon disruptions and traversal. The downsides are that it doesn't have as high dps as omen and thorax have for example.
The thing about caracal's is that you do not even have to go with RLML you can chose HAM's for cruiser fights and come on top both omen and thorax trough kiting them around. Caracals and missiles are at a good spot at the moment and my opinion is still that they do not need changing, but as you said that is just my opinion. |

Aivo Dresden
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
285
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 17:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:You do not have the range on both omen and thorax to reach the caracal in that 24km point range if he kites you correctly, especially thorax.
Yes they can both fit for cap boosters but if they field buffer tank they are slower than the caracal and caracal can always disengage, if they are active tanked and a pilot fits an overdrive injector on a caracal then not even an active tanked omen or thorax can catch you and you can always disengage and keep them in your point range.
I never said that there aren't better options than a caracal for that kind of warfare but it is not at all that underpowered just that if used correctly and with right tactic they are fully capable of being effective. I suppose in pure range numbers, Heavy Assault launchers have a shorter range, should be around 30km. RLML would be 60ish and Heavy Missile launchers probably around 90km. None of that is really that interesting, since past 24-30km you can't hold points and sniping with missiles just doesn't work. On paper HAMs would probably do even more damage but the damage application of those against frigates is just atrocious.
If you think about it, you would never fit small turrets on a cruiser. They just failed so hard on making missiles work against frigates, they instead designed a launcher that uses frigate sized ammo and fits on cruisers.
At 24-30km, you can't deactivate the MWD meaning the Thorax can decide to disengage and bail. At that point you're far beyond web range as well. It's extremely unlikely you'll hold down the Thorax.
Like I said though, it's just not good enough. Yea it might be possible and I'm sure people pull off kills like that, but who cares when there's a dozen ships that are just better? |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
304
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:12:00 -
[35] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:Aivo Dresden wrote:Eyana Starstruck wrote:Please refrain from such comments and personal insults targeted at the person with whom you do not share the same opinion, cause to any cultured and well mannered group you will just look silly and they will ignore you like I plan on doing. On the other hand that's just what it is. An Opinion. Your opinion of the Caracal can be whatever you want it to be. That doesn't take away the fact that RLML and arguably the Caldari ships as they are the ones that fit them most prominently, need some attention. If we get back to the original topic here though, the Caldari cruiser line, I would go as far as saying they are alright. The problem is that half of them have no decent weapon system to fit. There's really no decent medium missile system. And sure you can fly a Caracal fit with whatever launcher you want, it's just not as good as other cruisers. There are always alternatives. Sure the Caracal can do damage, just not as much as other cruisers. And sure it tanks, just not as well as others. It kites too, but just not as good as others. In a game where everyone min/maxes all the time, you want to fly the best. An average ship, with below average weapons just doesn't cut it, unless you like getting blown up. Ships like omen and thorax are forced into em/therm and kin/therm type damage and can't change it, can be neuted out thus their dps falls to 0, tracking disrupted and depend on sig and traversal, while caracal can shoot even if neuted out, can select damage type and have bigger range than most of the other cruisers, doesn't care about weapon disruptions and traversal. The downsides are that it doesn't have as high dps as omen and thorax have for example. The thing about caracal's is that you do not even have to go with RLML you can chose HAM's for cruiser fights and come on top both omen and thorax trough kiting them around. Caracals and missiles are at a good spot at the moment and my opinion is still that they do not need changing, but as you said that is just my opinion.
See its funny, because i see all of these words coming out of your mouth- words that when placed into sentances are not making any sense at all. Its almost as if you have no real PvP experience. So then I checked your KBs. And what did i find? Proof that as I had suspected, you are one of those arm chair theory crafters that somehow thinks they understand 'PvP' but in reality have no practical experience in the matter.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1630880
So impressive.
Or i am completely wrong, and you are an alt. Which is pathetic, because alts should never argue. |

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:41:00 -
[36] - Quote
You can change the type of ammo before the fight if you attack something, if you get caught you could change the type of ammo before the reload cycle.
I am well aware of the sig and speed affecting missiles and a kiting HAM caracal is able to do over 200 dps to omen and thorax for example against the weakest rez while being completely safe to disengage when and if they feel like it counting on the fact that they were the ones to open the fight. You wouldn't use HM's cause you can reach well into your point range so HAM's are the only choice besides the RLML.
Tell me how buffer with cap boosters thorax and omen fare versus a double prop taranis will you? |

Odithia
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2014.03.09 18:51:00 -
[37] - Quote
Have you guys ever tried shooting at an Interceptor with Heavy Pulse ? The moment the inty stop burning cluelessly toward you (under 25km) is the moment you stop applying any damage on it.
RLML give you option to apply damage whatever the range/transversal, you can't expect similar potential dps than a turret that can apply its damage only under optimal circumpstances. |

Brutor Trash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 01:26:00 -
[38] - Quote
Eyana Starstruck wrote:As said please go fight a well fitted cerberus with the same amount of flying skills in it as you have in your heretic and tell us the result.
That is the single most dumbest thing I've ever heard. I recommend you learn wtf is going on before posting complete trash. Everyone knows RLML is in a state of garbage and needs to be fixed.
Here's a poll http://poll.pollcode.com/59636175
http://eve-kill.net/?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=1630880 just saw this. Welcome to Eve Forums. These are the guys making changes, these are the who sperge on forums all day, this is all CCP sees. No wonder this game is screwed up. |

Joe Boirele
Lords 0f Justice Lords Of Stars
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 01:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
I have to say I agree that medium missiles are mostly useless, unless you just like pretty explosions. RLML have that 35 sec reload, HM have terrible damage application, and HAM are just meh. Enemies are just friends who stab you in the front.
Might makes right! |

Brutor Trash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 02:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Joe Boirele wrote:I have to say I agree that medium missiles are mostly useless, unless you just like pretty explosions. RLML have that 35 sec reload, HM have terrible damage application, and HAM are just meh.
Right, this isn't just about RLML. It's about the entire group of them. Each got nerfed into the ground one after the other and never got any attention again. Which is why I am worried about the state of RLML, will this too, just like HML and HAM be forgotten? |

Ayeshah Volfield
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 02:45:00 -
[41] - Quote
Brutor Trash wrote:Joe Boirele wrote:I have to say I agree that medium missiles are mostly useless, unless you just like pretty explosions. RLML have that 35 sec reload, HM have terrible damage application, and HAM are just meh. Right, this isn't just about RLML. It's about the entire group of them. Each got nerfed into the ground one after the other and never got any attention again. Which is why I am worried about the state of RLML, will this too, just like HML and HAM be forgotten?
Could you tell me which nerfs did HAMs receive ? Seems I've missed this update during my hiatus. I enjoyed eve until I went to the official forums and found out that the game is dying and I'm the reason why... |

Brutor Trash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 03:09:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ayeshah Volfield wrote:Brutor Trash wrote:Joe Boirele wrote:I have to say I agree that medium missiles are mostly useless, unless you just like pretty explosions. RLML have that 35 sec reload, HM have terrible damage application, and HAM are just meh. Right, this isn't just about RLML. It's about the entire group of them. Each got nerfed into the ground one after the other and never got any attention again. Which is why I am worried about the state of RLML, will this too, just like HML and HAM be forgotten? Could you tell me which nerfs did HAMs receive ? Seems I've missed this update during my hiatus.
Sorry for the confusion. I meant more neglect than nerf. |

bubble trout
Sky Fighters
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 10:45:00 -
[43] - Quote
Why does this even matter. They are fine as a fleet or small gang ship, so what if they aren't the great, or even good for solo pvp situations? There are tons of ships you can use solo, that don't work great in a large gang, how is this any different? |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
307
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 10:54:00 -
[44] - Quote
bubble trout wrote:Why does this even matter. They are fine as a fleet or small gang ship, so what if they aren't the great, or even good for solo pvp situations? There are tons of ships you can use solo, that don't work great in a large gang, how is this any different?
Thing is there are already such a small number of viable solo ships. Making this argument, it almost seems like you think there are a large and varied range of viable solo ships left int he game- and this is just not true.
Look back over your KB"s you have not had a solo kill, or for that matter any real PvP experience. So would you be willing to tell me what ships qualify as good solo ships? I am curious. |

bubble trout
Sky Fighters
202
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 12:19:00 -
[45] - Quote
Did you really look at my killboard? I have done a ton of pvp, but most of it is wormhole and null, as opposed to solo lowsec ****. I don't do tons of solo ****, as I have more fun playing with friends.
Guess what, solo is hard. Get friends or get used to picking fights carefully. It is an mmo and if you pick going solo you will have to a) pick your ship carefully, and b) pick your fight carefully, because not everyone is going to play your way.
Guess what, T1 cruisers are always going to have problems killing ceptors, a T2 ship *meant* to hold them down. That is the way the game is meant to be.
~~~~~~~~~~
What makes a good solo ship? Well in general, most "nano" ships that can kill tackle make decent solo ships. If you can't kill the things that move faster than you you will need to pick the fight much more carefully, like breaking them on a gate or fighting them where you can perhaps kill them before their friends reach you. The other option is to tank hard enough to de-agress, but that also requires thinking smart and not taking fights you can't win.
Picking the ship for the space is also important. I know a guy who runs around lowsec in a rail cat, and gets tons of kills, but him taking that to null would be stupid. He takes ceptors for light work there.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10327
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 12:23:00 -
[46] - Quote
Caldari cruisers are fine, its the pilots that are the issue here. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Hrett
Justified Chaos
359
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 15:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Caldari cruisers are fine, its the pilots that are the issue here.
Agreed. I dont fly them, but I fight against them. The Caracal is a good ship in many roles. The Moa is a beast in its role. And it is about to get even better...
On the missile thing - sure HM or HAMs have trouble with AB frigates and interceptors and only apply a small amount of damage. But guess what? They apply that minor damage in every situation. Medium Turrets may do OK damage when there is low transversal, but they do ZERO damage to those ships when they are in orbit (unless they are withing 9k and you have double webs - which benefit both weapon systems). It seems like a fair trade-off to me between the two weapon systems.
Anyway - once the Ishtar/sentries get nerfed (and they will be) the Cerb is going to be the new FOTM. Missiles are not in a bad place right now. I'm probably typing on an iPad, which means the auto-correct is silly and fixing typos is a pain. I ain't fixing them. |

God's Apples
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
324
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 21:10:00 -
[48] - Quote
Platy don't you know you can get cancer if you post a thread on the eve-o forums. |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
308
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 01:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
bubble trout wrote:Did you really look at my killboard? I have done a ton of pvp, but most of it is wormhole and null, as opposed to solo lowsec ****. I don't do tons of solo ****, as I have more fun playing with friends.
Guess what, solo is hard. Get friends or get used to picking fights carefully. It is an mmo and if you pick going solo you will have to a) pick your ship carefully, and b) pick your fight carefully, because not everyone is going to play your way.
Guess what, T1 cruisers are always going to have problems killing ceptors, a T2 ship *meant* to hold them down. That is the way the game is meant to be.
~~~~~~~~~~
What makes a good solo ship? Well in general, most "nano" ships that can kill tackle make decent solo ships. If you can't kill the things that move faster than you you will need to pick the fight much more carefully, like breaking them on a gate or fighting them where you can perhaps kill them before their friends reach you. The other option is to tank hard enough to de-agress, but that also requires thinking smart and not taking fights you can't win.
Picking the ship for the space is also important. I know a guy who runs around lowsec in a rail cat, and gets tons of kills, but him taking that to null would be stupid. He takes ceptors for light work there.
See its funny, because the large majority of your kills are POS structures, or are simply blob fests. So... I feel that you could be overstating the weight of your opinions regarding solo ships dealing with fast movers.
This thread is not about people playing 'our way' its simply an exercise in exploring the possible counters to the current frig heavy meta we are in currently. The excuse you have mentioned regarding the in-ability for a T1 ship to kill a T2 ship, is not congruent with the ship re balance plan CCP has explained to the community. I could post pages, and pages of kills showing me killing vastly more expensive / 'superior' ships to my own, but that is beside the point. CCP has stated many times, that the ability of T2 ships should not vastly supersede their T1 counterparts. As i have said before, a ship designed from the ground up to kill frigs, should be able to kill them. Currently this is not the case, and it is a problem. Your inability to realize how important this fact is, points to the lack of deeper PvP understanding, or experience. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10333
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 05:10:00 -
[50] - Quote
I do just fine killing frigs with rlml in a raven which has no bonuses for the weapon. The caracal is easily one of the most adaptableships going and forgiving to new new pilots. There is no problem with it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

W0lf Crendraven
The Tuskers
243
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 05:54:00 -
[51] - Quote
Hrett wrote:baltec1 wrote:Caldari cruisers are fine, its the pilots that are the issue here. Agreed. I dont fly them, but I fight against them. The Caracal is a good ship in many roles. The Moa is a beast in its role. And it is about to get even better... On the missile thing - sure HM or HAMs have trouble with AB frigates and interceptors and only apply a small amount of damage. But guess what? They apply that minor damage in every situation. Medium Turrets may do OK damage when there is low transversal, but they do ZERO damage to those ships when they are in orbit (unless they are withing 9k and you have double webs - which benefit both weapon systems). It seems like a fair trade-off to me between the two weapon systems. Anyway - once the Ishtar/sentries get nerfed (and they will be) the Cerb is going to be the new FOTM. Missiles are not in a bad place right now.
Really dont think cerb is going to be fotm again. I mean hams as such are ok, but rlmls suck (mainly due to no ammo changes, wouldnt be so bad if they just got a straight dps nerf but the ammo change on top really cripples the whole class, lets say you shoot a cruiser with rage and a frig shows up, you now have to spend 35secs reloading as youd do 0 damage with rage, by that time you are already tackled and dead).
Heavy missiles need a straight buff (application and dps) and rlmls need the ability to shift ammo in 10 or 5 seconds (while maintaining the same clip size). |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10333
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 06:32:00 -
[52] - Quote
Heavies dont not need more firepower, if you want more umph you use assaults. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Jonas Staal
Interstellar Booty Hunters
60
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 08:54:00 -
[53] - Quote
W0lf Crendraven wrote:Hrett wrote:baltec1 wrote:Caldari cruisers are fine, its the pilots that are the issue here. Agreed. I dont fly them, but I fight against them. The Caracal is a good ship in many roles. The Moa is a beast in its role. And it is about to get even better... On the missile thing - sure HM or HAMs have trouble with AB frigates and interceptors and only apply a small amount of damage. But guess what? They apply that minor damage in every situation. Medium Turrets may do OK damage when there is low transversal, but they do ZERO damage to those ships when they are in orbit (unless they are withing 9k and you have double webs - which benefit both weapon systems). It seems like a fair trade-off to me between the two weapon systems. Anyway - once the Ishtar/sentries get nerfed (and they will be) the Cerb is going to be the new FOTM. Missiles are not in a bad place right now. Really dont think cerb is going to be fotm again. I mean hams as such are ok, but rlmls suck (mainly due to no ammo changes, wouldnt be so bad if they just got a straight dps nerf but the ammo change on top really cripples the whole class, lets say you shoot a cruiser with rage and a frig shows up, you now have to spend 35secs reloading as youd do 0 damage with rage, by that time you are already tackled and dead). Heavy missiles need a straight buff (application and dps) and rlmls need the ability to shift ammo in 10 or 5 seconds (while maintaining the same clip size).
My tengu would like a HM buff |

Chessur
Amarrian Nublet Team Amarrica
308
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:I do just fine killing frigs with rlml in a raven which has no bonuses for the weapon. The caracal is easily one of the most adaptableships going and forgiving to new new pilots. There is no problem with it.
Go troll somewhere else. You have a whopping 1 solo kill in a raven, vs a catalyst. Your KB history is pathetic, and so is this troll attempt. Stop shitting up the forums. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10333
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 10:51:00 -
[55] - Quote
Chessur wrote:baltec1 wrote:I do just fine killing frigs with rlml in a raven which has no bonuses for the weapon. The caracal is easily one of the most adaptableships going and forgiving to new new pilots. There is no problem with it. Go troll somewhere else. You have a whopping 1 solo kill in a raven, vs a catalyst. Your KB history is pathetic, and so is this troll attempt. Stop shitting up the forums.
People still judge others on killboards?
I specialise in getting ships to do new and interesting things, you good sir are the terrible pilot as you are the one demanding an I win weapon vs frigates and high damage from long range weapons. I dont give a damn if someone has no solo kills or a million, what counts in knowing what ships can do. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Platypus King
Aunenen Civil Liberties Union
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
God's Apples wrote:Platy don't you know you can get cancer if you post a thread on the eve-o forums.
It's why I've stopped replying. My forum life is full of regrets. RIP my posting. |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
547
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:44:00 -
[57] - Quote
I just saw missiles fairing really well in the new eden open tournament. There must be something wrong. How could a team win with missiles in this game ? |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
10340
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 18:55:00 -
[58] - Quote
Clearly its witchcraft. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Hrett
Justified Chaos
362
|
Posted - 2014.03.11 20:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:I just saw missiles fairing really well in the new eden open tournament. There must be something wrong. How could a team win with missiles in this game ?
I have never flown a Typhoon Fleet Issue, but the New Eden Open makes me want to try. Seems to be doing well. I'm probably typing on an iPad, which means the auto-correct is silly and fixing typos is a pain. I ain't fixing them. |

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire
541
|
Posted - 2014.03.12 00:13:00 -
[60] - Quote
Once again, things boiled down to *my solo caracal can't even kill a malediction/heretic with one clip of rapid lights* for the one guy and *oh my god did those caracools really just volley our scimitar, broken as ***** on the bigger ganglevel. I'm also surprised you solo'ed a caracal in your heretic in a minute, thought heretics were bullocks for dps with lights. "I honestly thought I was in lowsec"
Moving pictures |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |