Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 25 post(s) |
Jhala Formei
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 00:31:00 -
[211]
Originally by: Heraklitus Nomidzon Fountain shows a "9" marker, but there is no "9" in the key on the right.
And there is a 1 on the key, but none on the map.
|
Wendat Huron
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 04:22:00 -
[212]
What's the status on Cache?
|
Drilla
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 08:29:00 -
[213]
It's Coallition space.
Seek not to bar my way, for I shall win through - no matter the cost! |
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 13:56:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Jhala Formei
Originally by: Heraklitus Nomidzon Fountain shows a "9" marker, but there is no "9" in the key on the right.
And there is a 1 on the key, but none on the map.
and only 1 of the 3 contested regions is on the key. Is he slipping a bit? ;p
There is still fighting in Fountain (though most of it involves Xelas and not BoB), probably best if Josh comes and takes a look and figures out if he wants the war marker there or not.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
DB Preacher
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 14:31:00 -
[215]
Edited by: DB Preacher on 03/07/2006 14:34:56 Unless you are directly involved in a claim on our territory then please refrain from posting on this thread with regards our territories as it simply confuses matters. We don't do it to anyone else and would appreciate if people didn't do it to us.
Again, I state:
VC have left Fountain, I could give detailed information as to where and why they have gone but I am sure they will do this themselves in good time.
Thanks, dbp
Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
|
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 14:55:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Jhala Formei
Originally by: Heraklitus Nomidzon Fountain shows a "9" marker, but there is no "9" in the key on the right.
And there is a 1 on the key, but none on the map.
and only 1 of the 3 contested regions is on the key. Is he slipping a bit? ;p
There is still fighting in Fountain (though most of it involves Xelas and not BoB), probably best if Josh comes and takes a look and figures out if he wants the war marker there or not.
Venal and Stain arent contested, theyre multi faction warzones as detailed by the 2 marker on them.
As for 1 and 2 in the legenda, theyre always there as they reserve those numbers even if theyre not actually present on the map at this time. -----
[Coreli Corporation Mainframe] |
Raeff
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 17:01:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Wendat Huron What's the status on Cache?
took me a sec to figure it out but if you look at the outline around cache its all the colors of the coalition(almost all)
|
The Armin
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 20:19:00 -
[218]
Edited by: The Armin on 03/07/2006 20:19:49
Originally by: DB Preacher
VC have left Fountain, I could give detailed information as to where and why they have gone but I am sure they will do this themselves in good time.
I hate to correct you dbp, but Shiva left, VC didn't. Not that it matters, BoB's sov in the region hasn't been threatened for a while. We hope that we'll be able to save the remains of the alliance and continue to give you good fights in Fountain though.
Then again, I'm just a "random", and you should perhaps not take me that serious :) I think theres gonna be an official statement regarding VC soon. -.- |
DB Preacher
|
Posted - 2006.07.03 20:47:00 -
[219]
Originally by: The Armin Edited by: The Armin on 03/07/2006 20:19:49
Originally by: DB Preacher
VC have left Fountain, I could give detailed information as to where and why they have gone but I am sure they will do this themselves in good time.
I hate to correct you dbp, but Shiva left, VC didn't. Not that it matters, BoB's sov in the region hasn't been threatened for a while. We hope that we'll be able to save the remains of the alliance and continue to give you good fights in Fountain though.
Then again, I'm just a "random", and you should perhaps not take me that serious :) I think theres gonna be an official statement regarding VC soon.
You should speak to your seniors about where you are going next before posting.
Cheers, dbp
Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
|
|
Chribba
|
Posted - 2006.07.04 11:14:00 -
[220]
I'd suggest you change the links to 'dl1.eve-files.com' rather than 'dl3' since 'dl3' is a submirror with lower uptime/accessibility than dl1 (plus dl1 will _always_ be accurate while the others are delayed in their updating).
Just fyi Keep up the great work!
/c
EVE-Files | EVE-Search | Monitor this Thread |
|
|
Ziriam
|
Posted - 2006.07.04 18:10:00 -
[221]
YO syndicate is a warzone!!! plz correct it. |
Antigen Po
|
Posted - 2006.07.04 19:37:00 -
[222]
Edited by: Antigen Po on 04/07/2006 19:37:24 The area currently shown as being owned by NFC and FLA is a warzone with FLA + IRON vs NFC + OPUS.
|
Ichabod Crane
|
Posted - 2006.07.04 19:44:00 -
[223]
Originally by: Ziriam YO syndicate is a warzone!!! plz correct it.
Syndicate is not a warzone, nor has it been for many months
There is always fighting here in Syndicate but no more than any other 0.0 region. IMO to be marked as a warzone it really would need two or more factions fighting each other for supremacy, and unless I am mistaken, ENIGMA does not claim or contest any other claim in this region -
|
Ziriam
|
Posted - 2006.07.05 06:03:00 -
[224]
Originally by: Ichabod Crane
Originally by: Ziriam YO syndicate is a warzone!!! plz correct it.
Syndicate is not a warzone, nor has it been for many months
There is always fighting here in Syndicate but no more than any other 0.0 region. IMO to be marked as a warzone it really would need two or more factions fighting each other for supremacy, and unless I am mistaken, ENIGMA does not claim or contest any other claim in this region
there is fighting in this region all day between d2, norad, 3fa, enigma, goon. so yea it is a war zone! |
Ichabod Crane
|
Posted - 2006.07.05 10:57:00 -
[225]
I never denied that there was fighting there, but without anyone actually contesting it, it just doesnt justify a warzone marker IMO. Places like pure blind and providence arent peaceful simply because they dont have a warzone marker you know
Syndicate already has a reputation as a violent and lawless region, it doesnt need some fancy sign to show that tbh -
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.05 15:23:00 -
[226]
Originally by: DB Preacher Edited by: DB Preacher on 03/07/2006 14:34:56 Unless you are directly involved in a claim on our territory then please refrain from posting on this thread with regards our territories as it simply confuses matters. We don't do it to anyone else and would appreciate if people didn't do it to us.
The question is whether the war markers are there for information purposes or as a prelude to region contesting.
If the former then there probably should be one in Fountain and if the latter there probably should not. I don't particularly care either way but I think that the role of the markers should be clarified.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.05 15:25:00 -
[227]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Jhala Formei
Originally by: Heraklitus Nomidzon Fountain shows a "9" marker, but there is no "9" in the key on the right.
And there is a 1 on the key, but none on the map.
and only 1 of the 3 contested regions is on the key. Is he slipping a bit? ;p
There is still fighting in Fountain (though most of it involves Xelas and not BoB), probably best if Josh comes and takes a look and figures out if he wants the war marker there or not.
Venal and Stain arent contested, theyre multi faction warzones as detailed by the 2 marker on them.
As for 1 and 2 in the legenda, theyre always there as they reserve those numbers even if theyre not actually present on the map at this time.
The map has little bubbles attached to Venal and Stain that say "contested space". So are you differentiating space contested between 2 parties and space contested between multiple parties?
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Mr Happ
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 16:20:00 -
[228]
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Jhala Formei
Originally by: Heraklitus Nomidzon Fountain shows a "9" marker, but there is no "9" in the key on the right.
And there is a 1 on the key, but none on the map.
and only 1 of the 3 contested regions is on the key. Is he slipping a bit? ;p
There is still fighting in Fountain (though most of it involves Xelas and not BoB), probably best if Josh comes and takes a look and figures out if he wants the war marker there or not.
Venal and Stain arent contested, theyre multi faction warzones as detailed by the 2 marker on them.
As for 1 and 2 in the legenda, theyre always there as they reserve those numbers even if theyre not actually present on the map at this time.
The map has little bubbles attached to Venal and Stain that say "contested space". So are you differentiating space contested between 2 parties and space contested between multiple parties?
Hi since your corp does not infact contest any space or claim any space, stop posting, eve mail works just aswell as spamming this thread, now you can spam his mail box 2 :)
LDT Recruitment |
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 22:00:00 -
[229]
Your post is spam. My posts are neither provacative nor uneccesary. If you have a constructive comment on what I have said, post it. Otherwise you are spamming.
This is a community resource. Indeed, one could argue that its primarily for the people NOT involved, since the people involved in the conflicts the map represents know alot more detail about their conflict than a mere picture can bely. Since I am not asking for changes at all, but merely offering a few critical comments, the responses to which could help clarify the current version of the map, I am not sure how you justify making your post.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Dianabolic
|
Posted - 2006.07.06 22:12:00 -
[230]
Originally by: Baun Your post is spam. My posts are neither provacative nor uneccesary. If you have a constructive comment on what I have said, post it. Otherwise you are spamming.
This is a community resource. Indeed, one could argue that its primarily for the people NOT involved, since the people involved in the conflicts the map represents know alot more detail about their conflict than a mere picture can bely. Since I am not asking for changes at all, but merely offering a few critical comments, the responses to which could help clarify the current version of the map, I am not sure how you justify making your post.
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Originally by: Abdalion Rules for this thread
1. Only post changes you believe should be made to the map.
2. If you disagree with the map makers decisions, contact a representative of your alliance and have them contact the map maker via eve mail or similar.
3. If you disagree with the map makers decisions, do not post, your post will be considered off topic and deleted, you may recieve a warning or a ban.
4. If the situation can not be solved with a discussion between the contesting alliances and the map maker you can contact the moderator team and ask them to mediate.
Them's the rules and you've "broken" them.
|
|
Mr Happ
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 01:47:00 -
[231]
Originally by: Baun Your post is spam. My posts are neither provacative nor uneccesary. If you have a constructive comment on what I have said, post it. Otherwise you are spamming.
This is a community resource. Indeed, one could argue that its primarily for the people NOT involved, since the people involved in the conflicts the map represents know alot more detail about their conflict than a mere picture can bely. Since I am not asking for changes at all, but merely offering a few critical comments, the responses to which could help clarify the current version of the map, I am not sure how you justify making your post.
As stated as above, i justify it as er, you broke the rules...
LDT Recruitment |
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 09:26:00 -
[232]
Edited by: Baun on 07/07/2006 09:35:16
Originally by: Dianabolic
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Those rules do not seem to be limited to asking for changes in territorial standing. My questions are about the way the map is presented and serve as a prelude to suggestions for its presentation should be changed. I have not broken any rules.
If the mods want to delete comments that are constructive, genuinely trying to help and are not insulting or provacative in anyway, they can feel free. I am not going to repost.
Of course its been 4-5 days and they haven't done anything. It looks to me like the bigger "threat" to this thread is it being derailed by people quoting rules by which I have abided instead of addressing the rather simple, and potentially revealing questions I am asking. So, if you will, allow Josh to answer my 2 basic questions and we can all gain a greater understanding of what his war markers mean and how he is trying to present the status of stain and venal.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Karosiak
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 09:35:00 -
[233]
Originally by: Baun Edited by: Baun on 07/07/2006 09:30:08
Originally by: Dianabolic
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Those rules do not seem to be limited to asking for changes in territorial If they want to delete comments that are constructive, genuinely trying to help and are not insulting or provacative in anyway, they can feel free. I am not going to repost.
Of course its been 4-5 days and they haven't done anything. It looks to me like the bigger "threat" to this thread is it being derailed by people quoting ill-conceieved rules instead of addressing the rather simple, and potentially revealing questions I am asking.
Is anyone else hearing waaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa booooo hoooo hoooooooooo?
Which part of mail him don't you get?
Now leave the alliance map to alliances, get out of the thread and stop spamming it with absolute rubbish.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 09:38:00 -
[234]
Originally by: Karosiak
Originally by: Baun Edited by: Baun on 07/07/2006 09:30:08
Originally by: Dianabolic
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Those rules do not seem to be limited to asking for changes in territorial If they want to delete comments that are constructive, genuinely trying to help and are not insulting or provacative in anyway, they can feel free. I am not going to repost.
Of course its been 4-5 days and they haven't done anything. It looks to me like the bigger "threat" to this thread is it being derailed by people quoting ill-conceieved rules instead of addressing the rather simple, and potentially revealing questions I am asking.
Is anyone else hearing waaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa booooo hoooo hoooooooooo?
Which part of mail him don't you get?
Now leave the alliance map to alliances, get out of the thread and stop spamming it with absolute rubbish.
What is wrong with you?
I am not spamming this thread, Y O U A R E.
I have not broken any rules, you have.
I am not asking for changes in territorial control, I am asking the map maker to clarify some things about the presentation of his map. Given that he made the map for the community, the proper place to address things that could clarify its reception is in a public forum.
Stop spamming, stop destroying this thread. I am doing nothing wrong. The only people who are not being constructive are people posting useless comments such as yours.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Emrod
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 09:46:00 -
[235]
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Karosiak
Originally by: Baun Edited by: Baun on 07/07/2006 09:30:08
Originally by: Dianabolic
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Those rules do not seem to be limited to asking for changes in territorial If they want to delete comments that are constructive, genuinely trying to help and are not insulting or provacative in anyway, they can feel free. I am not going to repost.
Of course its been 4-5 days and they haven't done anything. It looks to me like the bigger "threat" to this thread is it being derailed by people quoting ill-conceieved rules instead of addressing the rather simple, and potentially revealing questions I am asking.
Is anyone else hearing waaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa booooo hoooo hoooooooooo?
Which part of mail him don't you get?
Now leave the alliance map to alliances, get out of the thread and stop spamming it with absolute rubbish.
What is wrong with you?
I am not spamming this thread, Y O U A R E.
I have not broken any rules, you have.
I am not asking for changes in territorial control, I am asking the map maker to clarify some things about the presentation of his map. Given that he made the map for the community, the proper place to address things that could clarify its reception is in a public forum.
Stop spamming, stop destroying this thread. I am doing nothing wrong. The only people who are not being constructive are people posting useless comments such as yours.
Put a constested area in the Eve forum at the topic Territorial alliance map between all these random people below.
|
Karosiak
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 09:49:00 -
[236]
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Karosiak
Originally by: Baun Edited by: Baun on 07/07/2006 09:30:08
Originally by: Dianabolic
As much as I agree with the principle of what you're saying, Baun...
Those rules do not seem to be limited to asking for changes in territorial If they want to delete comments that are constructive, genuinely trying to help and are not insulting or provacative in anyway, they can feel free. I am not going to repost.
Of course its been 4-5 days and they haven't done anything. It looks to me like the bigger "threat" to this thread is it being derailed by people quoting ill-conceieved rules instead of addressing the rather simple, and potentially revealing questions I am asking.
Is anyone else hearing waaaaaaaa waaaaaaaaa booooo hoooo hoooooooooo?
Which part of mail him don't you get?
Now leave the alliance map to alliances, get out of the thread and stop spamming it with absolute rubbish.
What is wrong with you?
I am not spamming this thread, Y O U A R E.
I have not broken any rules, you have.
I am not asking for changes in territorial control, I am asking the map maker to clarify some things about the presentation of his map. Given that he made the map for the community, the proper place to address things that could clarify its reception is in a public forum.
Stop spamming, stop destroying this thread. I am doing nothing wrong. The only people who are not being constructive are people posting useless comments such as yours.
E V E M A I L H I M
Now stop spamming, you're destroying the thread
|
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 11:10:00 -
[237]
Mr Happ and Karosiak please go spam some other threat, if you have nothing usfull to say or ask then DONT POST. While technically Baun may be breaking the rules at least hes making a usefull contribution to the threat.
Originally by: Baun The question is whether the war markers are there for information purposes or as a prelude to region contesting.
Information purposes.
Originally by: Baun The map has little bubbles attached to Venal and Stain that say "contested space". So are you differentiating space contested between 2 parties and space contested between multiple parties?
Venal and Stain are marked as multifaction warzones, which basically means i am unable to find any usefull or accurate information as to who is actually in control of the region. -----
[Coreli Corporation Mainframe] |
Barin Serrano
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 11:30:00 -
[238]
Joshua,
Please can the territorial claim for the Outer Ring be updated to respect that NORAD and Fountain Alliance have merged into R I S E and handed control of this area to the new alliance.
Thanks -- Barin Serrano R I S E Foriegn Affairs |
Baun
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 14:51:00 -
[239]
Thanks for replying Josh.
Quote:
Originally by: Baun The map has little bubbles attached to Venal and Stain that say "contested space". So are you differentiating space contested between 2 parties and space contested between multiple parties?
Venal and Stain are marked as multifaction warzones, which basically means i am unable to find any usefull or accurate information as to who is actually in control of the region.
Would it make more sense to materially differentiate how you represent multi-faction war zones and contested regions on the map?
Since you have those 2 regions listed as contested but don't have an indentifiable conflict going on there for control of the region, would leaving the region completely blank and putting a multi-faction warzone marker there be better? That way when you have a region that is contested it can be made clear which factions are vying for control, and then in the future you can show who won (it would certainly make those animated map GIFs cooler). A multi-faction warzone could overtime evolve into a contested region when you have sufficient information.
Anyhow just a thought on that .... can't understand why people felt the need to spam in response to this.
Quote:
Originally by: Baun The question is whether the war markers are there for information purposes or as a prelude to region contesting.
Information purposes.
That makes sense.
The only input I have is that as far as Fountain goes, there is still alot of fighting, but it only occassionally involves BoB (when they really show up, they usually heavily outnumber their enemies there). I would suggest leaving the war marker but changing it to the people you have listed vs. Xelas. Certainly no region contesting going on there, but definitely fighting of which people should probably be aware.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
DB Preacher
|
Posted - 2006.07.07 15:15:00 -
[240]
Edited by: DB Preacher on 07/07/2006 15:20:45
I take it you missed the post by FA today and are unaware of the upcoming post by VC.
Why you persist in trying to get a warzone on fountain is beyond my understanding. There is no fighting going on. No fleets are roaming. No one is doing anything there. I spent 2 weeks up there recently and there was nothing to kill, xelas and bob were in complete control.
Now FA have pulled out and VC are pulling out to go and start enjoying the game.
We know you are bitter about what happened but seriously, move on. You'll never enjoy the game if you get stuck in the past.
dbp
Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |