EVE Search - Territorial Alliance Map - Latest Update 2006.04.27

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Territorial Alliance Map - Latest Update 2006.04.27

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 25 post(s)
Baun	Posted - 2006.07.07 15:53:00 - [241] Well in the last month just Celes has killed 60 BS, 1 carrier and 2-3 dozen HACs/Command ships just in Fountain (and about 100+ support ships), despite being virtually inactive for almost 2 weeks. As I said, this was mostly (almost exlusively, particularly lately) against Xelas. We are certainly fighting a war there. I could care less what your perception on the matter is DBP, given that you are unable to see my name without turning into an even larger ***** (if that is actually possible). Josh should go take a look. If he wants to remove the marker, he should certainly do so. My primary question was about what the markers were meant to represent, and according to his response it appears to be unrelated to territorial control. I am therefor somewhat mystified as to how you justify objecting to me posting (though I am not at all confused as to your motives). The Enemy's Gate is Down
DB Preacher	Posted - 2006.07.07 16:03:00 - [242] Hmm, Dice killed more than that in a week up north. I'd like a warzone across the whole of the north thanks. Oh wait, that doesn't work does it? IIRC The definition of the warzone that was posted before was something like "a constant daily fleet battle between forces over an extended period of time backed up with pos but without the desire to contest the region". Not some random gankings around a region by a piratical element. dbp Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
TWD	Posted - 2006.07.07 16:07:00 - [243] Originally by: Baun Well in the last month just Celes has killed 60 BS, 1 carrier and 2-3 dozen HACs/Command ships just in Fountain (and about 100+ support ships), despite being virtually inactive for almost 2 weeks. As I said, this was mostly (almost exlusively, particularly lately) against Xelas. We are certainly fighting a war there. I could care less what your perception on the matter is DBP, given that you are unable to see my name without turning into an even larger ***** (if that is actually possible). Josh should go take a look. If he wants to remove the marker, he should certainly do so. My primary question was about what the markers were meant to represent, and according to his response it appears to be unrelated to territorial control. I am therefor somewhat mystified as to how you justify objecting to me posting (though I am not at all confused as to your motives). There are ships being killed all over 0.0 space, I don't exactly get your point. We have random people pirating in our space all the time, as most 0.0 regions. We all know your presence in Fountain is temporary, so what exactly is it that you want?

Abdalion	Posted - 2006.07.07 16:08:00 - [244] Last I checked this wasn't a discussion thread. Locked for cleanup. ___

DB Preacher	Posted - 2006.07.07 16:25:00 - [245] Edited -Abdalion VC and FA have pulled out of Fountain Region. No need for a warzone. Thanks, dbp Current RKK Ranking: (PSCAL6) Proficient Short Tanto
ParMizaN	Posted - 2006.07.08 22:40:00 - [246] Hmm; the grey colour with the borders over cache: does this represent control by CHIMP, LV and KOS? sig edited for lack of pink really PINK -eris
Mr Happ	Posted - 2006.07.09 06:20:00 - [247] Originally by: ParMizaN Hmm; the grey colour with the borders over cache: does this represent control by CHIMP, LV and KOS? Yupperz LDT Recruitment
Tristan	Posted - 2006.07.09 09:43:00 - [248] warzone 9 not in map key ------------------------------------------------------------ * snip * - Ulynub Snip.. under what rule? quit being a jerkoff ulynid, what, your a 15yo who got some mod rights?
Xendie	Posted - 2006.07.10 02:16:00 - [249] you might want to put a warzone marker on fountain. since after checking a few killboards it looks like over a 1000kills up there in the last months and Celest is still there together with friends killing off Xelas daily. with the extreme lack of "BoB" in that region im amazed that they are allowed to still be listed as owners. heck even Xelas got more right to it as they live there then "BoB". dont believe me then go up there and see for yourself for a whole month. Originally by: F'nog This would be great, because lag is not at all a problem currently.
Plim	Posted - 2006.07.10 02:37:00 - [250] Yeah it would make sense if claiming a region had the requirement of actually being there. Just a crazy suggestion. ----------------- Victory or death! ... knitting is also an option.

Nifel	Posted - 2006.07.10 09:31:00 - [251] Edited by: Nifel on 10/07/2006 09:32:10 Dianabolic too fast >_<. "When I die I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandpa. Not yelling and screaming like the passengers in his car." RKK Ranking: (MIN14)
Dianabolic	Posted - 2006.07.10 09:31:00 - [252] Originally by: Plim Yeah it would make sense if claiming a region had the requirement of actually being there. Just a crazy suggestion. Try and build infrastructure there and see how long it lasts. XELAS are there at OUR invitation, Plim, WE decide, as we have proven time and time again, who is allowed to maintain their status in Fountain - that is why we are listed as its' owners. The fact that, erm, we ARE there on a daily basis - just not sat in the station systems - seems to be escaping you.
darth solo	Posted - 2006.07.10 12:42:00 - [253] Originally by: Dianabolic Originally by: Plim Yeah it would make sense if claiming a region had the requirement of actually being there. Just a crazy suggestion. Try and build infrastructure there and see how long it lasts. XELAS are there at OUR invitation, Plim, WE decide, as we have proven time and time again, who is allowed to maintain their status in Fountain - that is why we are listed as its' owners. The fact that, erm, we ARE there on a daily basis - just not sat in the station systems - seems to be escaping you. eve is not just about building pos's my friend.... the gun rules eve... PVPers dictate 0.0 space, not industrial characters... Fountain SHOULD be a warzone... The devs/mods/the public need only view the ammount of ships destroyed there to know this. Xelas are only squating in a-1 and a few pos's.... because our corp has no intention of capital fleets shooting pos's all day does not change this. yeah, ur alliance could bring enough so we cannot fight, but wouldnt that mean that the largest alliance in EVE would therefor own all of 0.0?, as they could prob take it when they like?.. owning an area should be noted only if u have a constant force there. you do not have this, and therefor the area should be contested. d solo.
Shariona	Posted - 2006.07.10 15:07:00 - [254] Sinds 5-24-2006 we (Celes)are fighting in fountain. All we see is Xellas, on the map its claimed by Bob. Shouldnt this be Xellas? Shariona Celesapoc official diplomat GOD is busy Can i help you?
welsh wizard	Posted - 2006.07.10 15:20:00 - [255] Edited by: welsh wizard on 10/07/2006 15:22:00 As far as I can tell from the in-game map Both BoB and Xelas share an equal number of sovereign systems in Fountain. If Xelas don't object to the map showing it as BoB's sovereignty then neither should we.
Paddlefoot Aeon	Posted - 2006.07.10 16:44:00 - [256] FREGE has disbanded and no longer claims soverignty in PureBlind. I believe STORM has moved in and is setting up POSes. This needs to be adjusted on the MAP Thanks, -Paddlefoot Now RECRUITING! Click my sig
Flourite	Posted - 2006.07.10 16:58:00 - [257] Originally by: Shariona Sinds 5-24-2006 we (Celes)are fighting in fountain. All we see is Xellas, on the map its claimed by Bob. Shouldnt this be Xellas? Shariona Celesapoc official diplomat Originally by: welsh wizard Edited by: welsh wizard on 10/07/2006 15:22:00 As far as I can tell from the in-game map Both BoB and Xelas share an equal number of sovereign systems in Fountain. If Xelas don't object to the map showing it as BoB's sovereignty then neither should we. Originally by: Abdalion Please pick ONE person per alliance/faction to post about your claims from either side, and stick to that. Too many people from the same alliance/faction posting differing information causes my head to explode trying to figure out who is who and trying to decipher what they are saying. Can you Celestial Apocalypse lot either choose one person to post or get a room please, too much talking or crap by too many diferent people in this thread. ok.?
Geralt Rivia	Posted - 2006.07.10 17:52:00 - [258] Originally by: Flourite Originally by: Shariona Sinds 5-24-2006 we (Celes)are fighting in fountain. All we see is Xellas, on the map its claimed by Bob. Shouldnt this be Xellas? Shariona Celesapoc official diplomat Originally by: welsh wizard Edited by: welsh wizard on 10/07/2006 15:22:00 As far as I can tell from the in-game map Both BoB and Xelas share an equal number of sovereign systems in Fountain. If Xelas don't object to the map showing it as BoB's sovereignty then neither should we. Originally by: Abdalion Please pick ONE person per alliance/faction to post about your claims from either side, and stick to that. Too many people from the same alliance/faction posting differing information causes my head to explode trying to figure out who is who and trying to decipher what they are saying. Can you Celestial Apocalypse lot either choose one person to post or get a room please, too much talking or crap by too many diferent people in this thread. ok.? So, u are the representant of Aliastra then?
Kaho Barud	Posted - 2006.07.10 21:01:00 - [259] queroious should be under FIX now i think
Eternal Fury	Posted - 2006.07.11 00:16:00 - [260] Edited by: Eternal Fury on 11/07/2006 00:17:30 Ok. I've been meaning to ask this for months. Where is 1 located. It says 1 is Pirate Infested. Large Quantities of Pirates present in this sector of space. But since I started playing and found this wonderful map, I've yet to figure out where 1 is. Had to ask. Brotherhood of Light. Small Corp, Big Fun. Wanna join?

Komolov	Posted - 2006.07.11 06:30:00 - [261] Thanks for your maps Joshua. Couple of notes (please update) Mark number 5 (RA vs gangbangers) should be extended on Insmother, Wicked Creek, Scalding Pass, Cache and probably southern Detorid. Also please add UCC and -M- to the list of them. We are not attacking V in their home systems in Great Wildlands. So i'm not sure about mark number 3. --------------------
sableye	Posted - 2006.07.11 07:09:00 - [262] Originally by: Eternal Fury Edited by: Eternal Fury on 11/07/2006 00:17:30 Ok. I've been meaning to ask this for months. Where is 1 located. It says 1 is Pirate Infested. Large Quantities of Pirates present in this sector of space. But since I started playing and found this wonderful map, I've yet to figure out where 1 is. Had to ask. from what I rmember number 1 was either northern syndicate or pure blind. ORC Recruiting You Today! Large Friendly 0.0/Empire Corp
Uther Doull	Posted - 2006.07.11 08:59:00 - [263] Originally by: Eternal Fury Edited by: Eternal Fury on 11/07/2006 00:17:30 Ok. I've been meaning to ask this for months. Where is 1 located. It says 1 is Pirate Infested. Large Quantities of Pirates present in this sector of space. But since I started playing and found this wonderful map, I've yet to figure out where 1 is. Had to ask. 1 and 2 are always on the legend, even if they don't actually have a place on the map itself
zincol	Posted - 2006.07.11 15:48:00 - [264] Bigblue space - Contested/war zone plz.
Dianabolic	Posted - 2006.07.11 19:19:00 - [265] Originally by: zincol Bigblue space - Contested/war zone plz. c'mon zincol, you know the score, if you're contesting it, state so - bring out the dreads, deploy the pos. A war zone, sure, but the two are VERY different.
WETRAIN	Posted - 2006.07.11 19:34:00 - [266] Hello Josh, i would like to ask you why have you remove PHA/IFC from HALE ? near CC space? it was marked as ILN/PHA/IFC but ILN joined LV so now its just PHA/IFC please put the marker back. Thank You Very Much. Yes ... I am back ... cant freaking quit ..
cryptic edge	Posted - 2006.07.11 21:47:00 - [267] Edited by: cryptic edge on 11/07/2006 21:49:27 The NFC no longer exists in deklein. The condition of deklein is currently contested. Further details will be given when the conflict is compleatly resolved by all those involved. edit - This includes the whole of deklein as of now. Sparta has attempted to claim NFC space due to NFC joining Sparta counting bodies like sheep to the rythm of the war drum
Avernus	Posted - 2006.07.11 23:09:00 - [268] Originally by: Kaho Barud queroious should be under FIX now i think Negative, we do not live in 'queroious', we do however live in Querious. Only those representing their respective alliances should be posting here. Current designated sovereignty for the region is correct, as is the lack of warmarkers. Nothing in life is quite so sweet as the taste of payback.
Dave White	Posted - 2006.07.12 11:03:00 - [269] Where's MC on this map, thought they had a little thing going in Period Basis?
Dianabolic	Posted - 2006.07.12 12:25:00 - [270] Originally by: Dave White Where's MC on this map, thought they had a little thing going in Period Basis? Are you in MC? No. Are you in BoB? No. Ergo, it's none of your business, nor is it your right to post it.



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 39 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.