| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Kyperion
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:32:00 -
[781] - Quote
Dalto Bane wrote:Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Kyperion wrote: This goes to the point of CCP trusting in the general community to be mature enough to know what line not to cross, and then CCP having the authority to come in and tell those few who don't have any conception of a line to get out.
On the whole I'd say CCP handled this situation pretty fairly, especially considering that you could hand out forum bans to a lot of people that posted in the threadnaught... on both sides
And they could have locked up all conversation about it too, which probably would have been the route most companies would have taken.
I'll put it this way. As a Bad Guy in EVE, and a member of the general EVE community who wants to have fun and blow things up, I have no problems at all respecting your boundaries. I'll accept that, as part and parcel of being the bad guy. Who knows, maybe you had a bad experience as a kid with extortion rackets, and New Order stuff gets to you. I totally understand, and hell, I can't judge. I've got my own buttons. On the other side, as a member of the same EVE community, you have a responsibility to let me know, clearly, WHERE your boundaries are, so I don't stomp on them. It's very difficult for me to tell the difference between "Screw you you ganker! (damn I just lost a ship how could I be that dumb I'll be over this in a minute) and Screw you ganker! (I had a bad experience as a kid with bullying and you're really hurting the person behind the keyboard now). I can't speak for everyone, but I'm positive most scammers, gankers, escrow agents, bumpers, and etc will stop if you say "This is a bad place for me, lets not go here." In fact, I'll be the first one in line with a pitchfork if I ever find out someone IS intentionally hurting another player, after being told to stop. That's BS, and it has no place in our community. Well said! Here is to hoping that freewill remains a part of the game, so Bad Guys can be bad, and Good Guys can come on Eve-O forums and complain about it welcome back Remiel |

Kyperion
200
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:32:00 -
[782] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Kyperion wrote: Well, we will never see eye to eye on this, that was obvious from the start.
But you really are completely going over the top by saying EHP buff of barges, and Jet can changes make your gameplay even close to significantly harder.
It's not just those two, as has been stated repeatedly. Ever heard of the insurance nerf? and again, completely does not affect you in the way you are complaining about. From previous statements you lead me to believe you make most of your money from a combination of margin trading and player loot drops.... so the insurance payout has zero impact on your game. Your determination to keep towing the party line is nothing short of zealotry. and I'd say the same for you |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1606
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:37:00 -
[783] - Quote
Kyperion wrote: Its really the semi-religious overtoned Cyber-cult propaganda spewed by New Order that irks me. That and my life's work being dedicated to the service of my country and community(Military/Security/Fire Services respectively), make it very hard for me to stomach even the roleplay of 'evil.'
With CCP's clear statements on the future of ganking, and scamming being crucial to the future of their vision of EVE, I just cannot see where all the worry is coming from on the fears of infringement upon their gameplay.
Blame CCP for the cyber-cult propaganda that is the New Order. They said we needed a reason to bump and gank and be nefarious, so we came up with one. Trust me, in the real world, nobody really worships James. Maybe have a beer with, but no worship.
Most of us just see Eve as a game. We're playing a role. The role is Bad Guy. We add a little more depth to the world....if the eve community were all forced to be good, this would be a fuckall boring as hell game to play.
My reason for being the Bad Guy? It gets me through my day. Believe or disbelieve, my real life story is pretty much out there. A decade of Army service with 3 tours to Iraq, including a pretty serious IED hit that put me out. Came out and went into the nursing field. I've dealt with, and am still dealing, with some pretty serious **** from what happened, and this isn't even bring trans into the mix yet! Playing a bad guy in Eve is my therapy. It lets me channel all of that awful, horrible crap into a "safe" persona and area, to burn it all off. Stuff that happens in Eve really doesn't matter, it's all pretendy fun-time games. Nobody actually loses anything. Nobody really gets hurt. If I couldn't channel all that aggression and ill-feelings, I don't know where I'd be today. It wouldn't be a good place, that's for sure. That's really all I feel safe sharing about, what with public forum. If you're really curious, detail can be gotten in private.
Mad props for that fire services work, too. I've had the pleasure of working a few Life and Ops Support tents on major fire calls, and I've never met a group of people more dedicated and selfless than the firedogs. Keep up the good work. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2143
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:40:00 -
[784] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Aivo Dresden wrote:Malcanis, you're not objectively presenting the points. Your disgust of option 1 is just appalling and that's fine, you have your own opinion.
Don't make that so obvious though and answer every question about option 1 with "is that really what you want? REALLY?". I'm just making sure, because some of the posters here seem to be unaware that their choice doesn't reflect their stated aims. If you were looking to lose weight, and told me that you'd decided to go on an all fudge cake diet, I might well comment on that too.
So long as the fudge cake diet was about a 1,000 calories or so a day, one would lose weight  This is not a signature. |

Kyperion
201
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:42:00 -
[785] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Kyperion wrote: Its really the semi-religious overtoned Cyber-cult propaganda spewed by New Order that irks me. That and my life's work being dedicated to the service of my country and community(Military/Security/Fire Services respectively), make it very hard for me to stomach even the roleplay of 'evil.'
With CCP's clear statements on the future of ganking, and scamming being crucial to the future of their vision of EVE, I just cannot see where all the worry is coming from on the fears of infringement upon their gameplay.
Blame CCP for the cyber-cult propaganda that is the New Order. They said we needed a reason to bump and gank and be nefarious, so we came up with one. Trust me, in the real world, nobody really worships James. Maybe have a beer with, but no worship. Most of us just see Eve as a game. We're playing a role. The role is Bad Guy. We add a little more depth to the world....if the eve community were all forced to be good, this would be a fuckall boring as hell game to play. My reason for being the Bad Guy? It gets me through my day. Believe or disbelieve, my real life story is pretty much out there. A decade of Army service with 3 tours to Iraq, including a pretty serious IED hit that put me out. Came out and went into the nursing field. I've dealt with, and am still dealing, with some pretty serious **** from what happened, and this isn't even bring trans into the mix yet! Playing a bad guy in Eve is my therapy. It lets me channel all of that awful, horrible crap into a "safe" persona and area, to burn it all off. Stuff that happens in Eve really doesn't matter, it's all pretendy fun-time games. Nobody actually loses anything. Nobody really gets hurt. If I couldn't channel all that aggression and ill-feelings, I don't know where I'd be today. It wouldn't be a good place, that's for sure. That's really all I feel safe sharing about, what with public forum. If you're really curious, detail can be gotten in private. Mad props for that fire services work, too. I've had the pleasure of working a few Life and Ops Support tents on major fire calls, and I've never met a group of people more dedicated and selfless than the firedogs. Keep up the good work. God Bless, Semper Fi, and thank you for your service. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
455
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 06:55:00 -
[786] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Winchester Steele wrote:https://xkcd.com/386/
did you just get a virus? I'm not about to click on a link like that without some explanation
ROFLMAO
AH HAHAHA how old are you again that you dont know that web comic? http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Kethry Avenger
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
98
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:04:00 -
[787] - Quote
Malcanis you are a glutton for punishment. You should have kept with the post you made to take the weekend off. Now I've wasted a couple hours of not shooting people in Titanfall looking for intelligent positions in this thread.
Option 2 by the way.
Though if they threw the word "Cyberbullying" into the relevant part of the TOS I would be good with that to.
They shouldn't define it just put it in there, keep people who want option 3 guessing.
On a related note to good and bad behavior in EVE. Topics popping up around the point of this thread make me think CCP should spend some time looking at ways for people who want to play good guys in the game some tools and support to do so. It currently seems hard to play the good guy. Even if you restrict what good guy means to doing things Concord likes.
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
455
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:25:00 -
[788] - Quote
You know, we dont actually know E1 was banned do we? Be funny as hell if he was lying http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

arabella blood
Revenant Tactical
254
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:29:00 -
[789] - Quote
It was fine. Lasted a decade. Now its spining out of control and like a mud slide. Time to tighten the fist.
1 please. Troll for hire. Cheap prices. |

Storm Novah
Yada Industries
26
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:30:00 -
[790] - Quote
For me it would be #2 with a line or two giving a bit more definition to the term of harassment. Not necessarily something that is hardlined but leaves room for the differences from case to case. |

Kyperion
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:31:00 -
[791] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Kyperion wrote:Winchester Steele wrote:https://xkcd.com/386/
did you just get a virus? I'm not about to click on a link like that without some explanation ROFLMAOAH HAHAHA how old are you again that you dont know that web comic?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jJf-p6RYvo
That about says it all. |

Kyperion
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:34:00 -
[792] - Quote
Kyperion wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Kyperion wrote:Winchester Steele wrote:https://xkcd.com/386/
did you just get a virus? I'm not about to click on a link like that without some explanation ROFLMAOAH HAHAHA how old are you again that you dont know that web comic? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jJf-p6RYvoThat about says it all.
Also, this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rou4IJsIIPo |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2143
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:37:00 -
[793] - Quote
Option 2, has been, is, and will be the way. This is not a signature. |

Anomaly One
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
124
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:55:00 -
[794] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:When I was a kid, comercials featured stunts and explosions and dangerous acts all the time. No one needed to be told the obvious: that this is a dramatization and doing this would be super stupid and get you killed.
The same kinds of commercials today feature a "do not try this' disclaimer everytime anyone does anything even slightly interesting.
Same thing is happening here. The 'torture" that occured on team speak in 2014 would have been called a hilarious extended prank call in 1984. Somewhere along the line, society got pussified to the point where everyone's "feelings" are the most important factor in every interaction. It's the exact reason who MMOs today are overwhemlingly 'think about the children' themepark games as opposed to the sandboxes of the past.
People got it wrong, it won't be the Star Citizens of the game world that will kill games like EVE, it will be increasingly puritanical society that will make the kinds of online interations that go on in and out of EVE less and less socially acceptable.
reminded me of this this
and how games changed.. if Quake was done today
I would have preferred 3 but you are right that there is no other game that has ever allowed that except two, one is online but shortly after release they tightened their grip, and the other wasn't online but it's the only one though. Psychotic Monk for CSM9 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 you want content in highsec? vote Monk |

Goa Chai
18
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 07:57:00 -
[795] - Quote
Well.... after investigating the details concerning recent events, particularly after hearing some very revealing Soundcloud audio (which came from a locked topic by the way), I believe I should clarify what I said in previous posts pertaining to actions carried out in relation to EVE. It's fun to be a sociopath, hell even an outright psychopath, in a video game, and I still believe "Psychological PVP" is something that should be permissible, in game, but to let that kind of behavior spill out of the game into other areas that have a real life impact on others is not only wrong, but in many places criminal, and I am glad CCP recognizes that.
That said, yeah #2 is the only logical choice. It's unfortunate that we're not all mature enough to handle #3 and follow the old "what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" rule. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
211
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 08:05:00 -
[796] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It's not just those two, as has been stated repeatedly. Ever heard of the insurance nerf?
Which was accompanied in the same expansion by the introduction of tier 3 battlecruisers and a massive dps boost for destroyers?
|

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
1497
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:06:00 -
[797] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:It's not just those two, as has been stated repeatedly. Ever heard of the insurance nerf? Which was accompanied in the same expansion by the introduction of tier 3 battlecruisers and a massive dps boost for destroyers?
That's right..... I keep forgetting that dessies aren't completely useless, anymore. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

Azrin Stella Oerndotte
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:16:00 -
[798] - Quote
2, the reasons the others are bad have already been stated.
We are adults, even if we act silly in our internet spaceships. |

Dalto Bane
V I R I I Ineluctable.
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:16:00 -
[799] - Quote
In light of recent events, I would like to pose a few questions and a few opinions.
What type of precedence will the banning of E1 set? If I know anything, I know that this will not stop here, with this one incident.
Now, can just anyone petition when they are asked to sing "I'm a little teapot" to save their ship, claiming to be "tortured"? I would like to think that CCP will use the "Reasonable Person" approach, but that can be a wide margin for some of us.
Does ignorance abolish responsibility for oneself? No, but it we are now taking giant leaps in that direction.
Erm, I really could go on and on about this. I was first attracted to Eve Online because it was a game that you could literally pave your own path, good or bad, and was not constrained as long as you were not handing out IRL threats or evading Concord or anything along the lines. I am very cautious toward any interpretation or ruling that limits what we can do, even if it is distasteful or weird (I hear the Bonus Room could get weird), as long as the participants engage in the action willing. So I will reiterate my answer -2- "Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinions of sheep." |

Muestereate
Minions LLC
260
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:31:00 -
[800] - Quote
Typical CSM, one side to represent the sickos interest.
how about option 4, ban all sadistic treatment except for guns
Option 5 : Recast EVE as a Xrated BSDM scifi sim. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
2784
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:37:00 -
[801] - Quote
Muestereate wrote:Recast EVE as a Xrated BSDM scifi sim.
WAAAAAAAYYY ahead of you *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx |

Emiko P'eng
67
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:51:00 -
[802] - Quote
I Vote 2
With a warning!
EVE Online, CCP & the EVE community were lucky this time!
Why!
CCP Servers are in the UK, the UK has Anti Cyber-Bullying laws for forums that have imprisonment for the worse offenders & fines for companies that don't cooperate by giving the authorities the actual addresses of those involved or allow it to happen again.
I suspect it is the reason CCP is more vigilant on the forums nowadays.
Now think of what would have happened if the victim was NOT a married man, but had been under 18 or even worse a 12 year old.
Now what I call the 'Paranoid Nostalgic' of the UK, which seems to be most of the Conservative Party, hate anything modern & are always looking for ways to wreck it or throttle it into submission. Once woken up they are tenacious in their campaigning to get rid of modernity in all its forms.
If the victim had been a 12 year old then a threadnought on this forum would have been the least of CCP problems, this would have been all over the UK press as an example of why the 'Cyber-Bullying' laws should be extended to online games.
And think about this.
You might be feeling smug that you live in the USA or Russia where UK and EU laws cannot touch you. But there is a simple solution to that. The campaigners would get the UK to follow China and get UK online games to only allow UK gamers play
CCP would then have a choice move to Iceland and loose a large chuck on their player base or move to Iceland and set up a UK only server like China's Serenity.
For those who scoff at the above, look at Australia.
EVE works because it it 30,000+ players on at any one time. If EVE gets fragmented it will fail as the running costs will rise per player and smaller communities mean less interactions
EVE Online is an adult game for ADULTS lets keep it that way! |

Stacy Knox
The CheRookies
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:58:00 -
[803] - Quote
Emiko P'eng wrote:I Vote 2
With a warning!
EVE Online, CCP & the EVE community were lucky this time!
Why!
CCP Servers are in the UK, the UK has Anti Cyber-Bullying laws for forums that have imprisonment for the worse offenders & fines for companies that don't cooperate by giving the authorities the actual addresses of those involved or allow it to happen again.
I suspect it is the reason CCP is more vigilant on the forums nowadays.
Now think of what would have happened if the victim was NOT a married man, but had been under 18 or even worse a 12 year old.
Now what I call the 'Paranoid Nostalgic' of the UK, which seems to be most of the Conservative Party, hate anything modern & are always looking for ways to wreck it or throttle it into submission. Once woken up they are tenacious in their campaigning to get rid of modernity in all its forms.
If the victim had been a 12 year old then a threadnought on this forum would have been the least of CCP problems, this would have been all over the UK press as an example of why the 'Cyber-Bullying' laws should be extended to online games.
And think about this.
You might be feeling smug that you live in the USA or Russia where UK and EU laws cannot touch you. But there is a simple solution to that. The campaigners would get the UK to follow China and get UK online games to only allow UK gamers play
CCP would then have a choice move to Iceland and loose a large chuck on their player base or move to Iceland and set up a UK only server like China's Serenity.
For those who scoff at the above, look at Australia.
EVE works because it it 30,000+ players on at any one time. If EVE gets fragmented it will fail as the running costs will rise per player and smaller communities mean less interactions
EVE Online is an adult game for ADULTS lets keep it that way!
+1 To this one
No way it should be possible for people to commint CRIMINAL acts and then hide behind the Game and make EvE an excuse for doing it.
You shouldn't be able to escape from legal action by beeing protected by a video game.
|

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
163
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:59:00 -
[804] - Quote
http://www.ncsl.org/research/telecommunications-and-information-technology/cyberstalking-and-cyberharassment-laws.aspx
Report and maybe they can just block the whole game. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1790
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:12:00 -
[805] - Quote
Emiko P'eng wrote: CCP Servers are in the UK, the UK has Anti Cyber-Bullying laws
https://sites.google.com/a/cypanthers.org/cease-cyber-bullying/real-life-examples-of-cyber-bullying
Would love to see you prove to a court that what happens in eve and voice coms is cyberbullying. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
2786
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:16:00 -
[806] - Quote
I guess Falcon's extremely clear final word wasnt clear enough for some people *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx |

Stacy Knox
The CheRookies
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:23:00 -
[807] - Quote
.
Quote:
Eve is game about spaceships, about economy and simulation of economical environment (everything comes down to isks). Latest event showed us that people in this game are not able to (Not 100% of them but major part enough) behave in an adult manner and limit themselves.
Place a red line, set the boundaries.
+1 |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:33:00 -
[808] - Quote
I prefer 3, but 2 is acceptable.
This whole fiasco is stupid, and I must say I've LOST a little respect for CCP and Eve as a result of the ban.
Where does CCP get off, telling ppl what they can and cant do on their own TS servers, a non-CCP environment that people PAY for.
The "victim" could have left any time he wanted. Nobody forced him to stay, nobody forced him to contract over all his junk, and nobody forced him to do anything. Was it a "nice" thing to do? NO, but should it be bannable? HELL NO.
I love this game over and above all MMO's PRECISELY because players have the freedom to get creative and scam, taunt, etc. What's next, banning suicide gankers because they're "griefing" other players? What a double standard.
Catch a clue, CCP, I'm willing to be that at least a large portion if not the majority of your dedicated players (read:customers) are paying u $15-$20 per account per month precisely because of the rather unregulated environment we get to play in. It's Eve's main selling point for more people than the bleeding hearts in this thread would like to believe.
"Respect the sandbox, but ban people who think too far outside the box." -CCP
I'm very disappointed that CCP is taking eve down the path towards WOWdom.
HTFU
"Be the villian" - CCP Ads
|

Stacy Knox
The CheRookies
13
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:34:00 -
[809] - Quote
Its not about the word, its about the context. Think before writing |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 13:41:00 -
[810] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote: However, there's a line as to how severe those circumstances should get, and I'll paraphrase Mynxee by saying that this line needs to be drawn at the point where the alleged victim starts to lose emotional control.
You can't possibly FAIRLY enforce that. Anyone who plays can tell you that some people lose emotional control when you blow up their shiny ship, rip off their corp, AWOX them, scam them, etc.
Are you SERIOUSLY saying that the measure of my ban-worthiness is merely how any given individual may react to it? People's emotional thresholds CAN NOT b4e predicted. What one guy laughs at, the next guy ragequits over. People are individuals. Some are more or less emotionally mature than others.
It's like passing a law that makes it a crime to "offend" someone. There's no objective scale by which it could be fairly enforced, and everyone is in danger of "makign someone angry."
This will have a true chilling effect on the game. If I ever get scammed, I'm going to make a recording of myself screaming, cussing, and crying and post it on soundcloud. Then the CCP "Emotional Well-being police" can come and ban the guy that scammed me, right?
Think about the slippery slope here, people.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |