EVE Search - CSM Feedback to CCP

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

CSM Feedback to CCP

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Ssabat Thraxx Dominion Tenebrarum 60	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:31:00 - [841] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And why not? Why do feel that after blowing up some "noob", as you put it, or anyone for that matter, and that person gets "really mad", you should have the right in upset the victim even more. Do derive pleasure from tormenting the victim AFTER killing their ship? Because NOBODY ON THIS EARTH has some inherent "right" to not be angered, offended, or upset. Basically, you want to throw people in jail for being assholes. Being an ******* is not a crime. If we start going down this road, CCP will never have time to do anything else other than respond to support tickets that say "After Soandso blew up my ship they kept talking smack to me. Ban them, pl0x!"
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 455	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:32:00 - [842] - Quote Stacy Knox wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Have you even been sleeping? You been posting in this thread every 5 seconds since over 24hours now yup; slept from 5-6 am toll 11 why? http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2788	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:32:00 - [843] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: The guy running the scam, obviously. DUH Grin, yeah he must have used Dominate 5 on him * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 455	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:35:00 - [844] - Quote Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Right, which is why I said 3. CCP said we cant HAVE rules defined because ppl will dance around them, so why have them at all then? It's like the airport security procedures with luggage and all that people complain "why bother? They've never actually caught a terrorist." Exactly. As soon as they stop inspecting and searching, the "fun" would begin immediately. IM having plenty of fun. Was before I even knew about this Will even after, regardless of the outcome. I dont even scam or shoot other players. But I think they should be able to. Hell, Im one of those most evil high sec mission running carebears that are ruining EVE. But listen to the ppl in this thread and even IM a sociopath roflmao. Ppl do love to throw that word around, dont they? Wait till you try Star Citizen and get banned for even using that word lol http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Katran Luftschreck Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps 2415	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:37:00 - [845] - Quote I love how the bumptards have all jumped in to defend this creep. It's like someone threw a bug-bomb down the drain pipe and now all the slimy creatures of EvE have found themselves pushed to the surface to cry injustice & beg for their homes back. Nullsec in a Nutshell: http://nedroid.com/comics/2006-08-24-2155-arrrdino.gif
Sentamon Imperial Academy Amarr Empire 1793	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:37:00 - [846] - Quote Arsine Mayhem wrote: Sentamon wrote: Emiko P'eng wrote: CCP Servers are in the UK, the UK has Anti Cyber-Bullying laws https://sites.google.com/a/cypanthers.org/cease-cyber-bullying/real-life-examples-of-cyber-bullying Would love to see you prove to a court that what happens in eve and voice coms is cyberbullying. This is funny. Proof is all there. The obvious eludes you. It's obvious you have no case. If you did I can guarantee you someone would be trying to get millions from CCP right now. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~
Stacy Knox The CheRookies 16	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:37:00 - [847] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Stacy Knox wrote: 1) The "victim" could have left any time he wanted.Nobody forced him to stay <---- Wrong; they forced him to stay by making him believe he would get his stuff back and even Win a lot of Isk 2) , nobody forced him to contract over all his junk, and nobody forced him to do anything. <--- Wrong they tricked him into doing it by making him believe he would win a lot of isk (That part was OK and had they simply told the victim he has been scammed and be done with it there would have been no reason to ban them. Its the inhumane events that followed ... Thats what a lot of people her don't "want" to understand. There fixed it for you Also; you DO realize by YOUR limited definition, that includes pretty much anyone who threatens to destroy your pixels and asks for isk/a song to keep them from being destroyed, right? Because theyre then holding you against your will (apparently) using your ship to "hold" you Yeah its easy to play around with words and twist someones Statement.
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2790	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:38:00 - [848] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: But listen to the ppl in this thread and even IM a sociopath roflmao. Ppl do love to throw that word around, dont they? Wait till you try Star Citizen and get banned for even using that word lol I knew when I saw the Malkavian in your name that you were my kind of nutter * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2790	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:39:00 - [849] - Quote EDIT: Removed as it was a bit low, even for me * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Muestereate Minions LLC 263	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:44:00 - [850] - Quote Ramona McCandless wrote: Muestereate wrote: other people that I trust This explains why I cant see things from your point of view Rule 1: Trust no one I know where your coming from but thats a bad side of this game, especially where the corp and alliance interfaces force you to trust people.
Stacy Knox The CheRookies 16	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:47:00 - [851] - Quote Stacy Knox wrote: Stacy Knox wrote: Liese Shardani wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Liese Shardani wrote: Yeah. It's common sense. If you wouldn't want this crap done to you or your kid brother or your best friend, then maybe they shouldnt be playing a lawless game like EVE maybe? I'm not talking about blowing up people's ships or stealing their stuff or scamming them. Most people acknowledge that as part of EVE's lawlessness. Any friends I'd encourage to play would be well aware of what they could be in for. Have you listened to the three audios that have been linked in GD over the last several days? There's the Sohkar audio, the Happy Miner Payout, and the Erotica 1 customer. It's hard to imagine a decent, reasonable person listening to that and being okay with it happening to a friend or family member. I'm embarrassed for our community that crap like this has happened to our fellow players, and I'm glad Ripard called it out and CCP banned the ringleader. Deserves a bump FUNNY THING IN the "Happy miner Payout" you can actually hear the voice of PSYCHOTIC MONK BE CAREFUL WHO YOU VOTE AS CSM 9 Just a reminder
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2791	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:48:00 - [852] - Quote Muestereate wrote: I know where your coming from but thats a bad side of this game, especially where the corp and alliance interfaces force you to trust people. I think its the good side. Thats pretty much where the two differing view points split in this game, not strictly speaking on this recent event. However, the interfaces dont really unless you make other people Directors, which is an accident waiting to happen. * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Dinsdale Pirannha Pirannha Corp 2491	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:53:00 - [853] - Quote Ssabat Thraxx wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And why not? Why do feel that after blowing up some "noob", as you put it, or anyone for that matter, and that person gets "really mad", you should have the right in upset the victim even more. Do derive pleasure from tormenting the victim AFTER killing their ship? Because NOBODY ON THIS EARTH has some inherent "right" to not be angered, offended, or upset. Basically, you want to throw people in jail for being assholes. Being an ******* is not a crime. If we start going down this road, CCP will never have time to do anything else other than respond to support tickets that say "After Soandso blew up my ship they kept talking smack to me. Ban them, pl0x!" Ah, so we get to the nut of it. You consider someone being an "ass-hole" in Eve because it is not illegal in the real world. (BTW, it should be, and depending on exactly how you demonstrate being an ass-hole, you are jailed.) Bad news for you chum. Eve is not the real world. Eve is not a country, with a complex set of laws, other than a ToS and Eula. It is a a company's business. And outside of discrimination laws, any business has the right to deny their goods and services to anyone they want. Consider this. If you act like a jerk in a bar or restaurant, there is a good bet you will get tossed out. I have been a bouncer on occasion, and I usually feel some modicum of pleasure when management gives me a nod to toss someone for doing something cruel. And you know what? Those jerks can complain and scream and resist as much as they like, but because it is a business, they have zero recourse. So unless you suddenly can get some court to agree that CCP is discriminating against you on the basis that they don't like ass-holes, they can ban you for anything, especially for acting clearly like you want to, and feel entitled to. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook.
Muestereate Minions LLC 263	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:53:00 - [854] - Quote Ramona McCandless wrote: Muestereate wrote: I know where your coming from but thats a bad side of this game, especially where the corp and alliance interfaces force you to trust people. I think its the good side. Thats pretty much where the two differing view points split in this game, not strictly speaking on this recent event. However, the interfaces dont really unless you make other people Directors, which is an accident waiting to happen. but you need to do it to cover timezones or even just taking a day off. THose wallets stink, hangers aren't to bad. I guess its escalting risk.
Dinsdale Pirannha Pirannha Corp 2493	Posted - 2014.03.30 14:56:00 - [855] - Quote BTW, this conversation just happened. I think this encapsulates everything wrong with this game, and the sociopaths defending their right to be sociopaths: Channel ID: -58667330 Channel Name: Private Chat (Dieter Rams) Listener: Dinsdale Pirannha Session started: 2014.03.30 14:42:16 n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:20 ] Dieter Rams > hi there o/ n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:22 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > hello n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:40 ] Dieter Rams > I need some quick help with a combat site, my DPS is too low to kill the NPC n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:06 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > sure. Let me get into a PvE ship n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:26 ] Dieter Rams > alright, what dps can you bring? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > well, I have a pretty pimped out Marauder that can bring about 1200-1300. But that is without much tank n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:39 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > To get that I have to fit 4 faction damage mods n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:45 ] Dieter Rams > we only need to kill 3 elite battleships so I think that wil do n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:32 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > what mission? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:48 ] Dieter Rams > it's a combat site, like lvl 4 in difficulty n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:58 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > which one? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:46:44 ] Dieter Rams > blood den n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > interesting. This one? https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Blood_Den n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:32 ] Dieter Rams > hehe you're sucha carebear n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:34 ] Dieter Rams > sad loser Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook.
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 458	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:10:00 - [856] - Quote Ramona McCandless wrote: Um Im not talking about morality. I dont care if something is moral or not, but I do intend to operate within what I understand to be the rules as imposed by CCP. I dont care about it either, but the ppl arguing against this kind of thing are preaching the evils of this act rather than anything else about 90% of the time "its a player behind the keyboard, sociopath" etc etc http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Winchester Steele 696	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:11:00 - [857] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ssabat Thraxx wrote: Ramona McCandless wrote: Ssabat Thraxx wrote: CCP Falcon wrote: However, there's a line as to how severe those circumstances should get, and I'll paraphrase Mynxee by saying that this line needs to be drawn at the point where the alleged victim starts to lose emotional control. Are you SERIOUSLY saying that the measure of my ban-worthiness is merely how any given individual may react to it? People's emotional thresholds CAN NOT b4e predicted. What one guy laughs at, the next guy ragequits over. People are individuals. Some are more or less emotionally mature than others. It's like passing a law that makes it a crime to "offend" someone. There's no objective scale by which it could be fairly enforced, and everyone is in danger of "makign someone angry." This will have a true chilling effect on the game. If I ever get scammed, I'm going to make a recording of myself screaming, cussing, and crying and post it on soundcloud. Then the CCP "Emotional Well-being police" can come and ban the guy that scammed me, right? Think about the slippery slope here, people. I know what you are saying, but thats not what the bolded text says. If someone loses the plot and has an enflamed reaction, then you stop. You dont need to predict it, and as it will always be after youve punished them, you will have your victory and your tears and no one gets banned. It basically says once they start crying, dont rub it in; youve won so let the poor schlub go. That's still, not workable in a fair and unambiguous way. Some people talk smack FOOORRRRREEEVVVEEEEERRR after blowing some little noob up. Often the noob gets RLY RLY MAD and goes into tirades in local. Are you saying that at that point I have to stop talking smack or Im gonna get banned? Horseshit! And why not? Why do feel that after blowing up some "noob", as you put it, or anyone for that matter, and that person gets "really mad", you should have the right in upset the victim even more. Do derive pleasure from tormenting the victim AFTER killing their ship? Yes. Although I do draw the line at keeping it 100% in game. ...
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2794	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:11:00 - [858] - Quote Muestereate wrote: but you need to do it to cover timezones or even just taking a day off. THose wallets stink, hangers aren't to bad. I guess its escalting risk. Fair points. And totally agree on the actual interface. Its a total nightmare. The only thing Id add is risk vs reward, but I also see your side of the line already by saying a player group shouldnt have that as an issue, but, meh I guess I like Spycatching, politicking and Roman-senatesque backstabbery :) But +1 for you friend. * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2794	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:12:00 - [859] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: A log Any real reply will probably be called out as me being antisocial and a meany shrug But isnt posting ingame chatlogs against forum rules? * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 458	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:12:00 - [860] - Quote Ssabat Thraxx wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And why not? Why do feel that after blowing up some "noob", as you put it, or anyone for that matter, and that person gets "really mad", you should have the right in upset the victim even more. Do derive pleasure from tormenting the victim AFTER killing their ship? Because NOBODY ON THIS EARTH has some inherent "right" to not be angered, offended, or upset. Basically, you want to throw people in jail for being assholes. Being an ***** is not a crime. If we start going down this road, CCP will never have time to do anything else other than respond to support tickets that say "After Soandso blew up my ship they kept talking smack to me. Ban them, pl0x!" Its gonna be fun as hell reading the blogs written by the ppl CCP bans for petition abuse after this ruling. Will those blogs get them to change their minds on this too? Because THAT my friends, IS a slippery slope. Ramona McCandless wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote:** The guy running the scam, obviously. DUH Grin, yeah he must have used Dominate 5 on him HA!!! Off topic, will ppl that use Dominate get banned I wonder lol http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Ramona McCandless The McCandless Clan 2794	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:13:00 - [861] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Ramona McCandless wrote: Um Im not talking about morality. I dont care if something is moral or not, but I do intend to operate within what I understand to be the rules as imposed by CCP. I dont care about it either, but the ppl arguing against this kind of thing are preaching the evils of this act rather than anything else about 90% of the time "its a player behind the keyboard, sociopath" etc etc Nods sagely I feel we are singing from the same hymnal, brother, Im just on a slightly later verse. * Vote MTU For CSM * "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx
Ssabat Thraxx Dominion Tenebrarum 62	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:13:00 - [862] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: Ssabat Thraxx wrote: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: And why not? Why do feel that after blowing up some "noob", as you put it, or anyone for that matter, and that person gets "really mad", you should have the right in upset the victim even more. Do derive pleasure from tormenting the victim AFTER killing their ship? Because NOBODY ON THIS EARTH has some inherent "right" to not be angered, offended, or upset. Basically, you want to throw people in jail for being assholes. Being an ***** is not a crime. If we start going down this road, CCP will never have time to do anything else other than respond to support tickets that say "After Soandso blew up my ship they kept talking smack to me. Ban them, pl0x!" Ah, so we get to the nut of it. You consider someone being an "ass-hole" in Eve because it is not illegal in the real world. (BTW, it should be, and depending on exactly how you demonstrate being an ass-hole, you are jailed.) Bad news for you chum. Eve is not the real world. Eve is not a country, with a complex set of laws, other than a ToS and Eula. It is a a company's business. And outside of discrimination laws, any business has the right to deny their goods and services to anyone they want. Consider this. If you act like a jerk in a bar or restaurant, there is a good bet you will get tossed out. I have been a bouncer on occasion, and I usually feel some modicum of pleasure when management gives me a nod to toss someone for doing something cruel. And you know what? Those jerks can complain and scream and resist as much as they like, but because it is a business, they have zero recourse. Sure, CCP has the right to ban anyone they want, for any reason, because it's their game. I don't argue against that point. I fully support anyone's RIGHT to do what they want with THEIR property. My point is, do they want to be fair, rational, and unambiguous about it, or do they just wanna flex muscle from time to time for no good reason when you compare it to other identical things that are allowed. But you bring up a good point: CCP can do as they wish with their "property," yet you dont feel that people have the right to do as they wish with THEIR property....like THEIR TS server that CCP should have no say over. You're coming from the position of a double standard here. Quote: So unless you suddenly can get some court to agree that CCP is discriminating against you on the basis that they don't like ass-holes, they can ban you for anything, especially for acting clearly like you want to, and feel entitled to. This isnt about ME, I dont talk smack, grief, scam, miner bump, or in any other way act like an **** in the game. References provided upon request What I AM doing is arguing against double standards and arbitrarily and ambiguously enforcing a VERY unclear and even illogical set of ever-changing rules. We have a saying here in America, "I abhor what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." That's how a feel about Erotica1. Is he an *****? Sure he is. I could never fck with and steal from people the way he does. That said, it's the "wild wild west" mentality of this game that I love, and that I think a significant portion of the player base loves. Eve is unlike any other mmo, and a BIG part of that is the relatively unregulated nature of the game. BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 458	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:14:00 - [863] - Quote Katran Luftschreck wrote: I love how the bumptards have all jumped in to defend this creep. It's like someone threw a bug-bomb down the drain pipe and now all the slimy creatures of EvE have found themselves pushed to the surface to cry injustice & beg for their homes back. Yeah and most of them seem to be on your side of the argument. Given the ppl trying to baby the game up and move away from the "HTFU" CCP of the past are the people Im talking about. http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 460	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:16:00 - [864] - Quote Stacy Knox wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Stacy Knox wrote: 1) The "victim" could have left any time he wanted.Nobody forced him to stay <---- Wrong; they forced him to stay by making him believe he would get his stuff back and even Win a lot of Isk 2) , nobody forced him to contract over all his junk, and nobody forced him to do anything. <--- Wrong they tricked him into doing it by making him believe he would win a lot of isk (That part was OK and had they simply told the victim he has been scammed and be done with it there would have been no reason to ban them. Its the inhumane events that followed ... Thats what a lot of people her don't "want" to understand. There fixed it for you Also; you DO realize by YOUR limited definition, that includes pretty much anyone who threatens to destroy your pixels and asks for isk/a song to keep them from being destroyed, right? Because theyre then holding you against your will (apparently) using your ship to "hold" you Yeah its easy to play around with words and twist someones Statement. Its easier when thats exactly what you said and I didnt have to twist anything PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Stacy Knox The CheRookies 18	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:18:00 - [865] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Stacy Knox wrote: 1) The "victim" could have left any time he wanted.Nobody forced him to stay <---- Wrong; they forced him to stay by making him believe he would get his stuff back and even Win a lot of Isk 2) , nobody forced him to contract over all his junk, and nobody forced him to do anything. <--- Wrong they tricked him into doing it by making him believe he would win a lot of isk (That part was OK and had they simply told the victim he has been scammed and be done with it there would have been no reason to ban them. Its the inhumane events that followed ... Thats what a lot of people her don't "want" to understand. There fixed it for you Also; you DO realize by YOUR limited definition, that includes pretty much anyone who threatens to destroy your pixels and asks for isk/a song to keep them from being destroyed, right? Because theyre then holding you against your will (apparently) using your ship to "hold" you And BTW i am just implying that there has to be a limit at some point. If E1 had made his victims cut themsmselves, or murder someone would you still be OK with it?
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 460	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:19:00 - [866] - Quote Ramona McCandless wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: But listen to the ppl in this thread and even IM a sociopath roflmao. Ppl do love to throw that word around, dont they? Wait till you try Star Citizen and get banned for even using that word lol I knew when I saw the Malkavian in your name that you were my kind of nutter WOO! Thread love! I actually made this guy when the last round (well from my perspective) of "omg the game is so overrun with antisocial personality disorder sufferers (sociopaths)", IE mittantigate XD PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Winchester Steele 696	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:20:00 - [867] - Quote Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: BTW, this conversation just happened. I think this encapsulates everything wrong with this game, and the sociopaths defending their right to be sociopaths: Channel ID: -58667330 Channel Name: Private Chat (Dieter Rams) Listener: Dinsdale Pirannha Session started: 2014.03.30 14:42:16 n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:20 ] Dieter Rams > hi there o/ n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:22 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > hello n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:40 ] Dieter Rams > I need some quick help with a combat site, my DPS is too low to kill the NPC n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:06 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > sure. Let me get into a PvE ship n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:26 ] Dieter Rams > alright, what dps can you bring? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > well, I have a pretty pimped out Marauder that can bring about 1200-1300. But that is without much tank n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:39 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > To get that I have to fit 4 faction damage mods n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:45 ] Dieter Rams > we only need to kill 3 elite battleships so I think that wil do n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:32 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > what mission? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:48 ] Dieter Rams > it's a combat site, like lvl 4 in difficulty n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:58 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > which one? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:46:44 ] Dieter Rams > blood den n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > interesting. This one? https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Blood_Den n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:32 ] Dieter Rams > hehe you're sucha carebear n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:34 ] Dieter Rams > sad loser So this proves what? That the guy you were talking to can't formulate a coherent thought. Myself I would have tried to get you in my mission pocket so I could gank your shiny marauder. I bet I could fetch a fine price for a Dinsdale corpse. That capsuleer missed a great opportunity. ...
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 460	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:21:00 - [868] - Quote Stacy Knox wrote: Stacy Knox wrote: FUNNY THING IN the "Happy miner Payout" you can actually hear the voice of PSYCHOTIC MONK BE CAREFUL WHO YOU VOTE AS CSM 9 Just a reminder How many "reminders" till it becomes harassment? You are targeting a single player with your "reminder"s. And then there are players like me who will vote for him now BECAUSE of that. PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested
Emiko P'eng 68	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:22:00 - [869] - Quote Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Emiko P'eng wrote: I Vote 2 With a warning! EVE Online, CCP & the EVE community were lucky this time! Why! CCP Servers are in the UK, the UK has Anti Cyber-Bullying laws for forums that have imprisonment for the worse offenders & fines for companies that don't cooperate by giving the authorities the actual addresses of those involved or allow it to happen again. I suspect it is the reason CCP is more vigilant on the forums nowadays. Now think of what would have happened if the victim was NOT a married man, but had been under 18 or even worse a 12 year old. Now what I call the 'Paranoid Nostalgic' of the UK, which seems to be most of the Conservative Party, hate anything modern & are always looking for ways to wreck it or throttle it into submission. Once woken up they are tenacious in their campaigning to get rid of modernity in all its forms. If the victim had been a 12 year old then a threadnought on this forum would have been the least of CCP problems, this would have been all over the UK press as an example of why the 'Cyber-Bullying' laws should be extended to online games. And think about this. You might be feeling smug that you live in the USA or Russia where UK and EU laws cannot touch you. But there is a simple solution to that. The campaigners would get the UK to follow China and get UK online games to only allow UK gamers play CCP would then have a choice move to Iceland and loose a large chuck on their player base or move to Iceland and set up a UK only server like China's Serenity. For those who scoff at the above, look at Australia with its Video Game rules. EVE works because it it 30,000+ players on at any one time. If EVE gets fragmented it will fail as the running costs will rise per player and smaller communities mean less interactions EVE Online is an adult game for ADULTS lets keep it that way! Do not give the those luddites who hate the Internet and all it entails an easy hammer to smash the Internet! What happens if youre an american cyvberbullying an american when the servers are in england? Whose laws are enforced? To those who hate the Internet in the UK the answer would be 'simple' ban all 'Foreigners & US players from games hosted in the UK. The fact it was 'Johnny Foreigners' who was doing the nasty things to each other. Definitely means that our citizens should not be exposed to 'That sort of behaviour' The 'Paranoid Nostalgics' that seem to make up a large part of the UK at the moment. Any examples of how 'The Internet' threatens 'their way of life' is a good enough reason to bring in draconian laws. You only have to look at the more 'Right Wing' press in the UK to see how they feel about those who 'Inhabit the Internet' Unfortunately at the moment we in the UK have a habit of bring in over the top laws due to 'knee jerk reactions' to campaigns in the press. So lets not give them the fuel for the their fire!
Antisocial Malkavian Antisocial Malkavians 460	Posted - 2014.03.30 15:23:00 - [870] - Quote I can translate: Dinsdale Pirannha wrote: This activity doesnt directly affect me other than in the case that I might be stupid enough to fall for it so I must get it made illegal! PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.