| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1476
   |
Posted - 2014.04.17 23:32:00 -
[121] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:
Spitting against the wind man, spitting against the wind.
Why the hell is there a way to escalate tickets and **** if the ISD are untouchable and always right in their actions?
They're not always right, but they're usually mostly right.
The way to deal with this is to be calm and follow the process (e.g. file an appropriate petition). I myself once got a permanent forum ban as a result of collateral damage. Filed a petition, got the entire thing reversed and an apology within two hours.
It's not a perfect system, but it works. But you aren't making a case for yourself by spamming your issue in every thread. |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
718
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 23:50:00 -
[122] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:
They're not always right, but they're usually mostly right.
So you agree that asking a ******* question about the UI is trolling?
Erufen Rito wrote:Im sure your idea couldnt possibly be so terrible that it deserved to be locked.
I asked how to turn off the alert sound it makes when your shields drop because as an armor tank its annoying.
Funnily a GM told me there isnt a way, and a guy in game told me how lol
And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit. |
PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
1478
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:00:00 -
[123] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
So you agree that asking a ******* question about the UI is trolling?
No, I think they made an error in your case. That doesn't mean they aren't usually right in most cases.
Like I said in the post directly above yours, there's a right way to approach your problem. What you're doing will only lead to frustration. Just trying to help... |
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
4649
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:09:00 -
[124] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
So you agree that asking a ******* question about the UI is trolling?
No, I think they made an error in your case. That doesn't mean they aren't usually right in most cases. Like I said in the post directly above yours, there's a right way to approach your problem. What you're doing will only lead to frustration. Just trying to help...
Sometimes an ISD can get a bit worked up (or on a roll) and accidentally throws a few babies out with the bathwater.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
718
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:24:00 -
[125] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
So you agree that asking a ******* question about the UI is trolling?
No, I think they made an error in your case. That doesn't mean they aren't usually right in most cases. Like I said in the post directly above yours, there's a right way to approach your problem. What you're doing will only lead to frustration. Just trying to help... Sometimes an ISD can get a bit worked up (or on a roll) and accidentally throws a few babies out with the bathwater.
So why arent legitimately trolling threads (cause this was so serious -.-) getting it then
And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit. |
Max Deveron
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
The 13th Wolf Guards
7
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:30:00 -
[126] - Quote
as an indy toon i must disagree with this topic or at least the idea the OP has behind it. An ultrasec area with ability to provide minerals and stuff to the rest of EvE would be disasterous to the economy. Such an area would HAVE to require no ability to affect it meaning no useful minerals, no ability to uild stuff, no bounty from rats...absolutely no way to make isk or build anything at all.
Otherwise the only solution to it would be everyone includng thos of us indy guys that enjoy eve for what it is would be to camp and gate that leads to this ultrasec and destroy anything that comes out of it ofr just the simple reason it is entering our beloved home.
I dont like some things in this game for their metagame ability.........but even i would definitely shoot you on site for this thread. Go back to your theme park games, you deserve to be ganked. and Quit trying to ruin EvE. |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4936
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:33:00 -
[127] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Organic Lager wrote:We all know the OP is referring to a zone much like in wow where players can't attack each other. If you like the WoW system so much, why don't you go play WoW? Or ESO, ToR, GW2, Rift, Runescape, FFXIV, Neverwinter, STO, DCUO, TSW, AION, or LoTRO? The ENTIRE MMO industry, with the exception of EVE, offers exactly what you're looking for. Why do you insist on trying to turn eve into one of *those* games instead of just finding the mmo that fits your needs?
This. If a "safe zone" is such a big freaking dealbreaker for you, then go play a game that has that kind of crap. Stop trying to ruin the things that we like about this game.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Asia Leigh
Beyond New Frontier
126
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 00:47:00 -
[128] - Quote
No
Keep your carebear Island out of my EVE, kbythx
Erotica 1: Scams someone-á-á Ripard: Makes inflamatory blog post that incites eve community and the MMO community-á Sohkar: I wasn't harrased-á-á-á-áCCP: Banned-á-á-á Moral of this story? If you don't want to get banned, don't **** off CSM |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
17928
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 01:06:00 -
[129] - Quote
Threads like this are why the forums need a bounty/dislike button. 
Highsec is fine as it is, it's safer than it ever has been. The more people push for it to be safer, the more the people who make it interesting will push back; so will those of us that appreciate Eve for what it is, but who don't usually indulge in shooting people in the face.
If people want a spaceship game with the possibility of next to zero PvP, they should hop on the Star Citizen bandwagon and use the PvP slider. There's also Elite Dangerous which is worth looking at because Elite. Unless they absolutely suck I'll be playing both of them, as well as Eve, but for entirely different reasons.
|
La Nariz
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
2089
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 01:33:00 -
[130] - Quote
Nerfing highsec will solve so many terrible problems.
This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team.
Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |
|
|
Sibyyl
400
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 03:37:00 -
[131] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Sure. Here is a full list of the restrictions ...
You should not be able to type anything in EVE chat except "hi", and "are you having a good day today?".
Also, who upvoted the original post?
Now that you are *campers* you will have more *parties* and no more *sad* *lonely* *bubbles*. |
Tesco Ergo Sum
90
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 04:00:00 -
[132] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:Tippia wrote:Sure. Here is a full list of the restrictions ... You should not be able to type anything in EVE chat except "hi", and "are you having a good day today?". Also, who upvoted the original post?
Hi!
Are you having a good day today?
NERF Forum PVP... |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4977
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 04:03:00 -
[133] - Quote
Tesco Ergo Sum wrote:Sibyyl wrote:Tippia wrote:Sure. Here is a full list of the restrictions ... You should not be able to type anything in EVE chat except "hi", and "are you having a good day today?". Also, who upvoted the original post? Hi! Are you having a good day today? NERF Forum PVP...
I am happy to confirm that I am having an amazing last 24 hours or so.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
340
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 05:54:00 -
[134] - Quote
Max Deveron wrote:as an indy toon i must disagree with this topic or at least the idea the OP has behind it. An ultrasec area with ability to provide minerals and stuff to the rest of EvE would be disasterous to the economy. Such an area would HAVE to require no ability to affect it meaning no useful minerals, no ability to uild stuff, no bounty from rats...absolutely no way to make isk or build anything at all.
Otherwise the only solution to it would be everyone includng thos of us indy guys that enjoy eve for what it is would be to camp and gate that leads to this ultrasec and destroy anything that comes out of it ofr just the simple reason it is entering our beloved home.
I dont like some things in this game for their metagame ability.........but even i would definitely shoot you on site for this thread. Go back to your theme park games, you deserve to be ganked. and Quit trying to ruin EvE.
It's only your opinion that it would be disastrous. It might be disastrous "to you", but only because you choose to make it so. You would have the option to not care about the veldspar mined in the Ultra-Sec.
If 1% of all empire space was converted to "Ultra-sec", it's hard to imagine, at least for me, this being a "disaster".
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
1171
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:20:00 -
[135] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:It's only your opinion that it would be disastrous. It might be disastrous "to you", but only because you choose to make it so. You would have the option to not care about the veldspar mined in the Ultra-Sec.
If 1% of all empire space was converted to "Ultra-sec", it's hard to imagine, at least for me, this being a "disaster".
Nope. It's not only his opinion. Its an opinion shared by many.
To extend that opinion, anyone calling for a non-pvp area should just dock up and never leave CQ. That or HTFU.
For all I care, create a non-pvp area, but accompany it with the level of reward commensurate with the risk. Remove all asteroid fields for example. No mission agents either and no moons or planets. Just empty space systems consisting of a sun and jump gates.
Then it would be balanced with other areas of space.
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
2226
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:23:00 -
[136] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Nerfing highsec will solve so many terrible problems.
Of course it would sweetie, not least the load on the servers as there would be less folk playing the game.
Hi-sec is as valid a part of the game as whatever part of it you play in.
The one thing I have never got used to in this game is folk behaving like kids wanting others to play their way or no way.
This is not a signature. |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:29:00 -
[137] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:It's only your opinion that it would be disastrous. It might be disastrous "to you", but only because you choose to make it so. You would have the option to not care about the veldspar mined in the Ultra-Sec.
If 1% of all empire space was converted to "Ultra-sec", it's hard to imagine, at least for me, this being a "disaster". Nope. It's not only his opinion. Its an opinion shared by many. To extend that opinion, anyone calling for a non-pvp area should just dock up and never leave CQ. That or HTFU. For all I care, create a non-pvp area, but accompany it with the level of reward commensurate with the risk. Remove all asteroid fields for example. No mission agents either and no moons or planets. Just empty space systems consisting of a sun and jump gates. Then it would be balanced with other areas of space.
You are allowed to feel that way.
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
1172
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:37:00 -
[138] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:You are allowed to feel that way.
Meh. Whether I'm allowed to or not is immaterial. Thankfully CCP share the view that teddybear land is not needed in EvE.
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:41:00 -
[139] - Quote
Scipio Artelius wrote:Divine Entervention wrote:You are allowed to feel that way.
Meh. Whether I'm allowed to or not is immaterial. Thankfully CCP share the view that teddybear land is not needed in EvE.
For now, but change is possible.
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy
Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:41:00 -
[140] - Quote
thanks to everyone for posting
1. this thread is not a troll, i was asked a question and looked to you for the answers, you stepped up and gave me what i wanted so thank you.
2. to me it seems that everyone is scared that ultra-sec would destroy the game, the only thing it would destroy, in my opinion is ship ganking and for a lot of you that is not on, your not worried about eve your worried that your style of killing pilots would end.
3. i agree zero risk zero reward but there is risk, i am certain of one thing and that is the eve community WILL find a way to get round the rules and ruin another players day.
4. WOW- i keep seeing this used as a slur, but having never played it the reference is lost on me.
5. personally if ultra-sec appeared i would not enter it. my game play style is follow incursion runners about and jump into mom sites and block logis hoping to see the mom win.
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
|
|
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4987
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:45:00 -
[141] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
So? That is a playstyle supported by CCP, why should it just disappear? Because people don't want to bother with defending themselves? Free tip, slick, there already is a game for those people, it's called Star Trek Online.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:47:00 -
[142] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
So? That is a playstyle supported by CCP, why should it just disappear? Because people don't want to bother with defending themselves? Free tip, slick, there already is a game for those people, it's called Star Trek Online.
It wouldn't disappear. High Sec would still exist as an area of operation for people to execute their desired playstyle.
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
Late Night Alliance
5235
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:49:00 -
[143] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Max Deveron wrote:as an indy toon i must disagree with this topic or at least the idea the OP has behind it. An ultrasec area with ability to provide minerals and stuff to the rest of EvE would be disasterous to the economy. Such an area would HAVE to require no ability to affect it meaning no useful minerals, no ability to uild stuff, no bounty from rats...absolutely no way to make isk or build anything at all.
Otherwise the only solution to it would be everyone includng thos of us indy guys that enjoy eve for what it is would be to camp and gate that leads to this ultrasec and destroy anything that comes out of it ofr just the simple reason it is entering our beloved home.
I dont like some things in this game for their metagame ability.........but even i would definitely shoot you on site for this thread. Go back to your theme park games, you deserve to be ganked. and Quit trying to ruin EvE. It's only your opinion that it would be disastrous. It might be disastrous "to you", but only because you choose to make it so. You would have the option to not care about the veldspar mined in the Ultra-Sec. If 1% of all empire space was converted to "Ultra-sec", it's hard to imagine, at least for me, this being a "disaster".
Trammel Server.
History has a tendency to repeat itself.
Change isn't bad, but it isn't always good. Sometimes, the oldest and most simple of things can be the most elegant and effective.
"How did you veterans start?" |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4987
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:49:00 -
[144] - Quote
Divine Entervention wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
So? That is a playstyle supported by CCP, why should it just disappear? Because people don't want to bother with defending themselves? Free tip, slick, there already is a game for those people, it's called Star Trek Online. It wouldn't disappear. High Sec would still exist as an area of operation for people to execute their desired playstyle.
The original post suggests otherwise, try reading it. It is heavily implied that this is intended to be a "solution" to ganking. As if ganking is a problem, and not clearly intended gameplay.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy
Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:51:00 -
[145] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
So? That is a playstyle supported by CCP, why should it just disappear? Because people don't want to bother with defending themselves? Free tip, slick, there already is a game for those people, it's called Star Trek Online.
star trek online, never played it. as for supported play style, it would not disappear from eve, just ultra-sec.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4987
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:54:00 -
[146] - Quote
leavemymomalone idiot wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:leavemymomalone idiot wrote:
6. to me it seems that the only people crying about this idea are the players who like to kill unarmed ships.
So? That is a playstyle supported by CCP, why should it just disappear? Because people don't want to bother with defending themselves? Free tip, slick, there already is a game for those people, it's called Star Trek Online. star trek online, never played it. as for supported play style, it would not disappear from eve, just ultra-sec.
So, this is for you. Go ahead and finish this sentence.
"Perfect safety should ever happen because..."
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Divine Entervention
Abyss Cooperative 3
342
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:54:00 -
[147] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
The original post suggests otherwise, try reading it. It is heavily implied that this is intended to be a "solution" to ganking. As if ganking is a problem, and not clearly intended gameplay.
That's only your choosing to focus on the reason for the suggestion rather than the suggestion itself.
He clearly states:
"Almost impossible to gank in these areas. i say almost, but i mean NEVER. "
So space that exists where pilots can fly around and not worry about being ganked. That does not equate to "make everyone in high sec" invulnerable.
If 1% of empire was converted to Ultra-sec, the other 99% would still exist as is. 1900 empire systems, 19 of them would be Ultra-Sec. Regardless of OP claims, which seems to be the motivation behind his suggestion, it doesn't detract from the fact that with this implementation, the rest of High Sec would still exist, the rest of Low sec would still exist, and all of null sec would still exist, giving everyone the opportunity to continue playing their desired play style.
Proof of lying in thread.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4349703#post4349703 |
Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space
The ROC
4988
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:57:00 -
[148] - Quote
If you want to talk about 1%, then rookie systems already exist.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|
Moonlit Raid
State War Academy
Caldari State
173
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:57:00 -
[149] - Quote
Risk averse.
If brute force isn't working, you're just not using enough. |
leavemymomalone idiot
State War Academy
Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2014.04.18 06:59:00 -
[150] - Quote
to paraphrase other posters
i say HTFU
if the risk adverse want to play in ultra-sec then its down to the eve pilots to find a way round that.
fighting within the rules getting round the rules and getting a kill against the odds.
ultra-sec would make the game harder and it would seem that most posters actually want to make it easier.
nerfing hisec would just give them new easy targets to pop. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |