As to the rest of your post. Practice what you preach before pointing the finger. You've been one of the most toxic additions to the forum in recent months, ready to bignote yourself while degrading others at the drop of a hat.

I'd be happy to put my history of sticking generally to the forum rules up against yours if you like. I already know how that comparison would go; and that's not opinion. It's a fact.

I interpret them as "reasons you choose to imagine in an attempt to discredit an idea you have chosen to oppose to fit your ideology".

Which is merely an opinion. Considering I've never received any warnings or infractions regarding the forum's rules, any classification you choose to label me with is merely your opinion, and it's a personal attack, and disrespectful.

It could happen, it could not. You don't know, and because you cannot know what will happen, I hope you forgive me for not regarding your opinions as facts of the matter.

I interpret them as "reasons you choose to imagine in an attempt to discredit an idea you have chosen to oppose to fit your ideology".

Yep absolutely my opinion, shared by a number of people who have expressed similar views as well.

Warnings and infraction notices (or lack of) are not a sign that you stick to the forum rules. Your post history is very easy to go through. You should take a look back and reread some of the things your written to and about other people.

As for my post being a personal attack. Absolutely. Report it and have it deleted. Given the way you have treated people on this forum over the last 2-3 months, I'm more than happy to take responsibility for my post if a warning or ban were to result.

I'm also more than happy to express my opinion about you again, directly to you: Practice what you preach before pointing the finger because you are a toxic and disruptive element in the forum and while I value your involvement in discussions, I definitely don't value the way you have approached expressing your view since you first arrived here.

Relevant stuff

Yeah, you're probably right. I apologise.

I'll just offer up the opinion of the EvE Client instead:

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3768/13898096921_3e09dd781f_o.jpg

Not my opinion mind you. I already apologised for that. Just EvE's view.

I am in a Boost High Sec thread. No just no, for the sake of all the pretty butterflies flying in WoW no! Actually i dont know if they have pretty butterflies flying in WoW.

Of course it would sweetie, not least the load on the servers as there would be less folk playing the game.

Hi-sec is as valid a part of the game as whatever part of it you play in.

The one thing I have never got used to in this game is folk behaving like kids wanting others to play their way or no way.

i know you may not believe it, but im not trying to be funny.

all i hear is more fights all eve is about is everyone versus everyone

well i think that the risk adverse should get what they want to. it is a sandbox after all why shouldn't eve have totally safe areas?


all i hear is we want more victims to shoot.

When all you babbys who throw tantrums and threaten to quit after every change/potential highsec nerf finally leave it will be a better game. It will be less toxic and so much better EVE will have massive growth.

Start nerfing highsec now and never stop.

I'd say this carried weight, if i didn't see a bunch of your alliance mates last night suicide ganking noobs with dessies. The guys hitting bot miners I can have a small amount of respect for, they were cleaning up eve of actual garbage, but the ones in the noob system ganking noob ships? They make a good argument for something actually rather like this, because that **** is what drives away new players.

And while you can make an argument that 'noobs should get used to it' the fact is that if people are getting ganked the moment they start playing a new game, they're likely to not renew after the end of their trial account.

That is, after all, the purpose of high sec, to ease new players into eve and to provide some place where trade can be conducted in (relative) safety. Unless you want to start opening your sov to traders (spies) from your nullsec neighbors, you should hope they don't nerf it too hard.

But then, I seem to recall that goonswarms stated goal on their inception was to destroy EvE (and not in the pew pew sense), so...

Is it really hard to type destroyer, its literally two more characters and a lot easier to read? We don't go out of our way to target newbies no matter what you want to try to claim its false. Was this alleged new player a 2 year old account in a hulk? Newbies don't fly hulks. We are doing people a favor by teaching them that the only safe place is in the station. Unfortunately that means less hilarious meltdowns but, overall its good for the game for people to accept that yes risk : reward exists.

Never not nerf highsec.

E: We also don't do anything in newbie systems so I think you are trying to spin a story.

Wait, which one is it, that you were trying to teach noobs a lesson, or that you would never do that? Both sides of your mouth were speaking at once, but saying two different things.

Next time I see it I'll post some screen caps. They were noob ships, not hulks. I ought to know, i was following them around in a cloaked prowler salvaging. BTW: the preferred barge to hit is not a hulk, but a mackinaw. At least, according to what some of your guys were saying in local. Seems hulks have fallen out of favor.

Pretty sure I know more than some random idiot on the forums trying spin a story painting us as evil destroyers of newbies.

I know what some of you are thinking. "It would bring in more players." No, not players, just subscriptions, so people could run their favorite miner bots and macros.

Again, that might have more weight if I hadn't worked with major alliances in the past and know that you have trouble keeping track of what everyone in your corp is doing, let alone in your alliance.

Also: goonswarm following rules? Last I checked you were positively famous for breaking them and getting away with it.

As I said, next time I see it I'll screen cap it. I generally orbit through those systems once a month as I wander about EvE.



You do know those subscriptions are what funds CCP's making new content for everyone, right?

Okay highsec person whatever you need to say to spin your story that can and has already been countered by facts or/and data.

Nerfing highsec is good for EVE.

Okay highsec/nullssec/WH/low person whatever you need to say to spin your story that can and has already been countered by BECAUSE I SAID SO!

Nerfing highsec is good for goons.

And once inflation is completely out of control . . .

OP should show us on the shapeship doll where the catalysts touched her