Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |

mkint
1207
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 18:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:mkint wrote:Bjurn Akely wrote:mkint wrote: You've never done something stupid IRL to impress your friends? When you do inevitably do something stupid to impress your friends in the future, now that there's a precedence of the consequences for honesty, are you going to come clean?
Yes. It even went to the prosecutor. But that was not in any way related to eve. In fact it was back in the -80's. What's your point? The point is, if the penalties for honesty is a harsh punishment, and the penalty for lying is, well, nothing, would you be honest? Yes. For there is only one responsible for my actions, namely me. Even if I wasn't aware of the consequences or possible later repercussions at the time of those actions. And I have done some (in hindsight) rather stupid things irl....  For some reason, I suspect that people prone to vandalism or other RL crimes might not take the same view. If you confess and have a 100% chance of getting a beating, but if you deny the crap out of it, you have a chance of getting off scott free, why ever confess?
And hell, other people brought it up, so why not... why does urging a couple thousand people to drive someone to suicide not result in anything other than a slap on a wrist, but putting some marks on a chunk of metal result in "pursuing punishment to the full extent of the law"? Maxim 34: If you're leaving scorch-marks, you need a bigger gun. |

Jayem See
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
2623
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 18:53:00 -
[92] - Quote
Well done CCP. Thanks for keeping us updated about this.
I personally feel that the actions taken in relation to this are perfect. Good job.
Just very sorry it had to be done in the first place... Aaaaaaand relax. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
5862
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 18:54:00 -
[93] - Quote
Glad you got the scumbags.
Now, any word on getting this repaired, and future preventative action? "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
-áPsychotic Monk for CSM9.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10708
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 18:56:00 -
[94] - Quote
how many people does it take to scratch an aluminum plate
four, apparently Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Marsha Mallow
511
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 18:59:00 -
[95] - Quote
I can't believe no one has asked for their stuff yet 
Speaking of which TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5472
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:05:00 -
[96] - Quote
Marsha Mallow wrote:I can't believe no one has asked for their stuff yet  Speaking of which
I did, but suddenly: Falcon.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Gorski Car
ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
275
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:09:00 -
[97] - Quote
GET REKT IRL INGAME UP AND DOWN #GORSKI4CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4265138#post4265138
|

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
377
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:20:00 -
[98] - Quote
It great you were able to find the individuals responsible and that appropriate measures have been taken, hopefully this can be a lesson for anyone else who may consider doing it in the future. |

scrambled
Viziam Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:24:00 -
[99] - Quote
mkint wrote:Hmm... some of the guys involved turned themselves in, and still got perma-banned? Not condoning what they did in any way whatsoever, but doesn't such a harsh response disincentivize people in the future from admitting to what they've done while drunk?
Being drunk is not an excuse for doing stupid things, nor is it a "well thanks for turning yourself in, have a cookie" card. At least those who turned themselves in had some sort of moral compass to aim by, but you won't escape the fact that all actions have consequences. And unfortunately, the consequence here was a permanent ban. They'll have to deal with that.
Maybe an incentive to not get plastered off their faces... |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
454
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:30:00 -
[100] - Quote
CCP should have performed an Ancient Babylonia move - "An eye for an eye."
Since they know who the real life individuals are and their in-game avatar names, if memory serves me correctly, Iceland is known for their smelting of aluminum, then a plasma cutter should be lying around somewhere. So CCP removes the plates that have their names, cleanly cut out their now banished name, and replace the open spot with a blank.
Unless CCP is already pursuing this route, those real life people unwanted by the Eve community are still apart of the monument's naming structure. |
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5474
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:39:00 -
[101] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:CCP should have performed an Ancient Babylonia move - "An eye for an eye."
Since they know who the real life individuals are and their in-game avatar names, if memory serves me correctly, Iceland is known for their smelting of aluminum, then a plasma cutter should be lying around somewhere. So CCP removes the plates that have their names, cleanly cut out their now banished name, and replace the open spot with a blank.
Unless CCP is already pursuing this route, those real life people unwanted by the Eve community are still apart of the monument's naming structure.
Obviously taking a plasma cutter to a monument created by a famous artist will only improve the piece.
 The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
382

|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:55:00 -
[102] - Quote
Pornographic post was removed.
Forum rule 6. Racism and discrimination are prohibited. ISD Tyrozan Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department @ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL |
|

JP Nakamura
Union of Intergalactic Miners and Nano Assemblers
31
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 19:59:00 -
[103] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:CCP should have performed an Ancient Babylonia move - "An eye for an eye."
Since they know who the real life individuals are and their in-game avatar names, if memory serves me correctly, Iceland is known for their smelting of aluminum, then a plasma cutter should be lying around somewhere. So CCP removes the plates that have their names, cleanly cut out their now banished name, and replace the open spot with a blank.
Unless CCP is already pursuing this route, those real life people unwanted by the Eve community are still apart of the monument's naming structure.
Was actually just wondering about the idea of removing their names from the monument.
At the very least their names should be removed from the database interface for the monument so they can't be "looked up" to figure out where they are.
The only down side to this is that it might indirectly name the toons/accounts/individuals, something CCP is choosing not to do. CCP: 10+ years of Harvesting players Tears -á(latest efforts being Source Limited Edition, and Alliance Logo Revised Policies) |

Bernie Nator
4U Services Inc. Upholders
1043
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:01:00 -
[104] - Quote
scrambled wrote:mkint wrote:Hmm... some of the guys involved turned themselves in, and still got perma-banned? Not condoning what they did in any way whatsoever, but doesn't such a harsh response disincentivize people in the future from admitting to what they've done while drunk? Being drunk is not an excuse for doing stupid things, nor is it a "well thanks for turning yourself in, have a cookie" card. At least those who turned themselves in had some sort of moral compass to aim by, but you won't escape the fact that all actions have consequences. And unfortunately, the consequence here was a permanent ban. They'll have to deal with that. Maybe an incentive to not get plastered off their faces... That's not to say that being drunk is an excise. I know plenty of people who got sloshed at FI (self included) and didn't feel the end to deface the monument. Deface my own pride, sure, but a monument? That's low. |

TheMasterSenor
Modulated Dreams Circle-Of-Two
5
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:03:00 -
[105] - Quote
The first act of vandalism on this monument was it being in Iceland. BAZINGA |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
3925
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:04:00 -
[106] - Quote
If they turned themselves in, and paid to fix the damage they caused, I'd think a 6-month ban from EvE and a permaban from Fanfest would be appropriate. These are people that paid lots of RL money to travel to fanfest and take part in this game, and most likely have spent significant amounts of time and energy on this game. A permaban is akin to a life sentence away from their major hobby, which seems pretty harsh IMO.
Perhaps maybe a year ban.....
If they don't pay for the damages, or they didn't come forward, I'd recommend the harsher sentence.
Then again, I don't know the details. Perhaps this was particularly egregious, and the harsher sentence is very much called for!!
|

De Veresse
One Horse Trading
4
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:07:00 -
[107] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:[quote=Guttripper]CCP should have performed an Ancient Babylonia move - "An eye for an eye."
Since they know who the real life individuals are and their in-game avatar names, if memory serves me correctly, Iceland is known for their smelting of aluminum, then a plasma cutter should be lying around somewhere. So CCP removes the plates that have their names, cleanly cut out their now banished name, and replace the open spot with a blank.
Unless CCP is already pursuing this route, those real life people unwanted by the Eve community are still apart of the monument's naming structure.
Obviously taking a plasma cutter to a monument created by a famous artist will only improve the piece.
Erm... this is a good point, the obvious thing - and probably quickest/cheapest, is to remove the said plate and remake. Looking at the pictures on the web they look VERY firmly secured and the scratching deep. All I can say is good luck to the poor bugger who has to fix it.
My suggestion is get the child who did the damage to polish them out the old way - with ever finer grades of wet and dry and a final polish with a bit of rouge on a duster, that's a good days work.
Oh, make them do it during winter. |

Artyom Estemaire
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
2
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:08:00 -
[108] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:
As such, three individuals have been permanently removed from the EVE Community. A total of 7 EVE Online accounts, and 1 DUST 514 account belonging to them have been permanently banned. Another individual who was indirectly involved in the vandalism has received a 6 month ban from EVE Online on their sole registered account.
I feel like I'm missing something, did they catch the people who did this? Were there several persons involved? |

I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
1111
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:15:00 -
[109] - Quote
mkint wrote:Hmm... some of the guys involved turned themselves in, and still got perma-banned? Not condoning what they did in any way whatsoever, but doesn't such a harsh response disincentivize people in the future from admitting to what they've done while drunk?
Being drunk isn't an excuse. I'm glad they got what they deserved. Wish they would have named names so we could all tell them how moronic they were. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9603
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:18:00 -
[110] - Quote
Artyom Estemaire wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:
As such, three individuals have been permanently removed from the EVE Community. A total of 7 EVE Online accounts, and 1 DUST 514 account belonging to them have been permanently banned. Another individual who was indirectly involved in the vandalism has received a 6 month ban from EVE Online on their sole registered account.
I feel like I'm missing something, did they catch the people who did this? Were there several persons involved? Did you actually read the part you quoted? "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
5474
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:23:00 -
[111] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Artyom Estemaire wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:
As such, three individuals have been permanently removed from the EVE Community. A total of 7 EVE Online accounts, and 1 DUST 514 account belonging to them have been permanently banned. Another individual who was indirectly involved in the vandalism has received a 6 month ban from EVE Online on their sole registered account.
I feel like I'm missing something, did they catch the people who did this? Were there several persons involved? Did you actually read the part you quoted?
Not with those mirror sunglasses.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1055
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:26:00 -
[112] - Quote
Andski wrote:how many people does it take to scratch an aluminum plate
four, apparently
The fact that 4 person were involved make it all that much more stupid TBH. None of those 4 person were able to use their brain and think "Maybe that's not a good thing to do.". Either that or it was too much effort to do it alone...
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Can you name and shame the characters? Nothing more, just character names. Probably not, but this seems like a situation where identifying the people who did this by their in-game characters would be cool. Name and shame is probably appropriate here.
Beside out of game retaliation which are something nobody should be advocating for, WTF are you gonna do with a character name on a banned account?
The only reason why the person won't be named is to be sure no one goes on a crusade IRL toward them. |

Sirinda
Ekchuah's Shrine Comporium
346
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:26:00 -
[113] - Quote
Good to know we're rid of them. |

mkint
1209
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:29:00 -
[114] - Quote
Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Can you name and shame the characters? Nothing more, just character names. Probably not, but this seems like a situation where identifying the people who did this by their in-game characters would be cool. Name and shame is probably appropriate here. While my curiosity is itching, I don't think that's a good idea. Since they are perma-banned, what could be gained, except harassing their corp/alliance who did the right thing by turning them in? Maxim 34: If you're leaving scorch-marks, you need a bigger gun. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1015
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:38:00 -
[115] - Quote
mkint wrote:Proletariat Tingtango wrote:Can you name and shame the characters? Nothing more, just character names. Probably not, but this seems like a situation where identifying the people who did this by their in-game characters would be cool. Name and shame is probably appropriate here. While my curiosity is itching, I don't think that's a good idea. Since they are perma-banned, what could be gained, except harassing their corp/alliance who did the right thing by turning them in?
People who go around harassing people could eat the banhammer too. This game is good when you have robust villains. People who were nuked for vandalism carries a good amount of infamy.
Also I'm just curious.
And nobody should dog on the corp/alliance because all signs point to them being pretty intolerant of that noise. |

hnfnfhfthfth fthftjhnjfjf
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:42:00 -
[116] - Quote
>only cfc and pets are complaining about the permaban >cfc and pets were the first to retweet that fake gevlon account
GEEE I wonder who did it ?! Can you guys guess ?          
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
9603
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:47:00 -
[117] - Quote
hnfnfhfthfth fthftjhnjfjf wrote: This doesn't really explain the part where the perp's own alliance mates turned them in. That being the case it doesn't make much sense for us to then complain about them being banned too long, or for that matter try to frame Gevlon in the first place.
The only objections to the permaban are on the basis that leniency should have been applied for any perp that turned themselves/the others in. Carrot and stick more easily gets a mule to move than just the stick. "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Frostys Virpio
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1055
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 20:51:00 -
[118] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:hnfnfhfthfth fthftjhnjfjf wrote: This doesn't really explain the part where the perp's own alliance mates turned them in. That being the case it doesn't make much sense for us to then complain about them being banned too long, or for that matter try to frame Gevlon in the first place. The only objections to the permaban are on the basis that leniency should have been applied for any perp that turned themselves/the others in. Carrot and stick more easily gets a mule to move than just the stick.
While I see your point, we don't know if any carrot were given for turning themselves in. |

Xenuria
The Scope Gallente Federation
848
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 21:01:00 -
[119] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:What steps has CCP taken (or plans to take) to prevent future abuse/vandalism of the monument? This is something I would also like to know. If something like this happened once than it can potentially happen again.
I also have a question, the people that got banned permanently from EvE; can I have their stuff? CSM 9 Candidate Philanthropist Polymath Savant Hero |

scrambled
Viziam Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.05.07 21:02:00 -
[120] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:scrambled wrote:mkint wrote:Hmm... some of the guys involved turned themselves in, and still got perma-banned? Not condoning what they did in any way whatsoever, but doesn't such a harsh response disincentivize people in the future from admitting to what they've done while drunk? Being drunk is not an excuse for doing stupid things, nor is it a "well thanks for turning yourself in, have a cookie" card. At least those who turned themselves in had some sort of moral compass to aim by, but you won't escape the fact that all actions have consequences. And unfortunately, the consequence here was a permanent ban. They'll have to deal with that. Maybe an incentive to not get plastered off their faces... That's not to say that being drunk is an excise. I know plenty of people who got sloshed at FI (self included) and didn't feel the end to deface the monument. Deface my own pride, sure, but a monument? That's low.
Well not saying that getting drunk is bad, just that people tend to put any sort of moral inhibitions aside when they are. Been there, done that, got a t-shirt too. It's just that many people will use the "yeah but I was drunk" excuse and expect to be let off without anything happening.
Actions have consequences; I mean, the consequences of you getting totally sloshed are your pride being a tad injured I think (and probably video/photo evidence of it being available too :P) and that's fine, it doesn't hurt anyone else but yourself.
Deciding you're going to **** up a monument because apparently internet spaceships are still serious business.... well. That's not just low, that's really, really, bloody stupid. And I hate that people argue that permanent bans are too harsh because "whoever did it was drunk". So what, they still did it. Live with the consequences I say :D |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |