Why are either party failing the contract? I usually find it simpler to: JF pilot couriers to Alt who couriers back to the JF pilot. The JF Pilot delivers the package and then the alt delivers it again. No failed contracts on record.

Completing a courier contract destroys the plastic wrap container, but the plastic wrap container is what I'm after. I don't want to break the container (aka deliver the courier contract) at the destination because all items will just mix with other deliveries, my own stocks and trading stocks.

It is also much neater for the people receiving the goods. They get a nice present with their name on it, they can break the wrapping now or have a ready made package for later.

I suggest this and people tell me I'm an idiot. You suggest it and you get a ton of likes. What gives? I'm not allowed to make intelligent suggestions?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=288396
See? No likes. Not one.

I suggest this and people tell me I'm an idiot. You suggest it and you get a ton of likes. What gives? I'm not allowed to make intelligent suggestions?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=288396
See? No likes. Not one.

Fix unscannable double wraps too please.

Everything that makes our Logibro's life less tedious is something I wholeheartedly agree with.

I'd say make it an NPC seeded item to start with from each of the Empires main Courier\Hauling corporations (I've read EVE Source, they exist!) and this will add an ISK sink in as well. Not too expensive but not dirt cheap either.

Eventually add this as a schematic or something to PI or a BPO that uses PI goods and voila, another thing to make, build, sell.

I like this idea. It might make most freight containers obsolete though. Why use a set of 50k cans that you only fill part way to separate items for different clients when you can custom wrap them.

I don't understand a thing about courier contracts, or plastic wrap.

Can someone give me the layman's of the current system, and what this proposes to do? Because I didn't understand it at all from the OP.

Scan Reflective Bubble Wrap.

Made from plastics or something from PI. It is a container that is produced and used like any other, except it prevents cargohold scanning on items inside of it and it can stretch to fit any size items.

The restriction? You need one for every item (or stack of items) that you want to be scan proof.

The proposal is to allow a system to put things into a package of any size that is unscannable, without the use of courier contracts.

to allow a system to put things into a package of any size

I think you're missing the point. As I understand it, it's , no more and no less. I would use it even if it was fully scannable.

The containers and wrapping serve different purposes. Containers are to organize goods, are to be put to and taken from many times. Wrapping instead is to make packages, created once and taken from once. They complement each other.

Plastic wrap is when you place a courier contract package into a courier contract. The goods inside cannot be scanned and the package has the same volume as the goods inside.

The proposal is to allow a system to put things into a package of any size that is unscannable, without the use of courier contracts.

Context Menu Item. Select multiple items, right click -> plastic wrap ; Items are packaged into a shipping crate

I like the idea and for quite different reasons.

Now and then there happens a situation when I'd like to prepare a ship for use, just not now. Such wrapping would be nice solution, when I could wrap a ship along with all modules I'd like to use into one nice package which could have been moved wherever I want it to have.