If you would have followed the uni's overview settings you would have learned all you neeeded to know about high sec aggression mechanics. If they threw you out, it will take more than a survey but I applaud your eforts to at least pretend like your trying, that you weren't at fault and that it was other players and game mechanics that led to your expulsion.Thats the true EVE spirit if I ever heard it.

Excellent suggestion. But I can't quite change the form now without messing up the results.

According to this personality test, I qualify as a, "Hyper-Carebear." Do I get a potato now?

Survey blah blah blah...I think we all know the real question here: What the everliving crap does one have to do to get kicked from E-UNI after only a month?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=210049&find=unread

That, if you want to know. But the leadership has changed now. I'm sure (or at least I hope) they are less bearish these days.

Oh i remember that thread. Glad to hear your still around

"I would encourage new players to get into theft, suicide ganking, war-decs and awoxing; to what extent do you agree with this statement? "

Don't like the wording. I love theft, suicide ganking, war-decs.
I think attacking corp mates in high-sec is pathetic by comparison.

Filled the survey out though +1

If you would have followed the uni's overview settings you would have learned all you neeeded to know about high sec aggression mechanics. If they threw you out, it will take more than a survey but I applaud your eforts to at least pretend like your trying, that you weren't at fault and that it was other players and game mechanics that led to your expulsion.Thats the true EVE spirit if I ever heard it.

I was following the whole issue when it went down. Amyclas was expelled for unapologetically posting his own opinions on the EVE Online forums, which was against the rules for E-Uni bros at that time. The rules have since been changed. Also, I've never heard him complain about having been expelled, or blame "other players and game mechanics".

It was Kelduum that led to my expulsion, nothing to do with overview settings and mechanics. But the expectations surrounding high-sec and the economy around high-sec aggression has always interested me.

Little confused by this. I mean, theft is basically joining a corp, then taking advantage of them to steal all their ****. AWOXing is just doing the same, but blowing them up instead. I can't really see why one is fine with you, but the other is "pathetic."

Have you ever been a victim of suicide ganking while you were afk?

Because theft requires them to trust you in a directorship role so requires an active decision on their part and work on your part.

AWOXing is taking advantage of a legacy mechanic that should have been removed from the game because it's a weird exception to the concord rules and was implemented specifically to allow testing of fits way back when, and the dueling mechanic has rendered it obsolete.

So yea, that's why I regard AWOXing as lowest of the low and a good corp theft, while scummy, is to be appreciated as a work of villany that took some effort.

This seems like a loaded question. You shouldn't assume we play afk.

That's why the question before it doesn't mention AFK, just whether or not you've been ganked. Seems to me he's trying to figure out how many respondants were ganked and how many of those were being un-smart.

2 general categories for this:

1 - Those who care to varying degrees and enjoy it consistently
2 - Those who say they don't care, but will voice disdain if is it too inconsistent.

In the end it does not matter what people say on the degree of their caring. The reality is that a good brand and consistent story is important on many levels, If not for the integrity of the Role Play, then for the confidence of all other users in the ability of the producers to manage different aspects of the project.

This seems like a loaded question. You shouldn't assume we play afk.

I don't love the wording of some of these. For example...

"Have you ever been the victim of a non-consensual war-dec? *"

I've been the recipient of such a war-dec, I've lost things in such wars (generally an offline POS while I was away from the game for a spell, **** happens), but "victim" implies an entirely different experience.