EVE Search - Gallante Ti3 BS

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Gallante Ti3 BS

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
jbob2000	Posted - 2006.06.02 13:50:00 - [31] Originally by: Waragha Originally by: jbob2000 I'd like the new one to be a blaster one. 8 turrets, 3 mids, 7 lows, small drone bay, big armor, low shields, agile, solid capacitor. Bonuses would be 15% reduction to MWD cap penalty, 5% bonus to capacitor capacity per level. wtf dont want it to be TOO powerful, and yeah, maybe a tracking bonus instead of the cap, but the MWD cap reduction is almost essential for blasters. Megathron is more sniper, imo
Phrixus Zephyr	Posted - 2006.06.02 14:16:00 - [32] The only way i can see them finding a niche for Tier 3 Gallente is changing the role(s) of the Mega or Domi somehow. Even if it means just changing one bonus. Originally by: Jude Kopenhagen I heard a little bird tell me that the new Battle Ship will be called "The sky is falling, I'm gonna have to learn more skills, oh woe are us!"
Svenholio	Posted - 2006.06.02 15:45:00 - [33] I want to see a picture, anyone have a linky for the new BS?
Lathera Hen	Posted - 2006.06.02 15:58:00 - [34] here you go Gllante Ti3 BS
Madcap Magician	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:02:00 - [35] Originally by: Gariuys Originally by: Breed Love Edited by: Breed Love on 02/06/2006 11:43:29 omg people stfu about ew ships already, what if sissy-pee listens to that crap? This way it would atleast perform well in its very niche role. Sounds quite nice indeed. Except we shouldn't have Tech 1 ships that are forced into their role. I personally feel (and I fly the Blasterthron a lot and would love a better Vindicator) we should wait for Tech 2 battleships before the Gallente get a truly designed Blastership. Come and get some!
Lathera Hen	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:04:00 - [36] i think you will get them with kali... but thats just me blabering jiberish...
Tiuwaz	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:04:00 - [37] t2 battleships will never see the light, and if they ever do then you wont get a heavy assault version Originally by: Oveur This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
Svenholio	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:11:00 - [38] Thanks for the link
LWMaverick	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:21:00 - [39] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I saw Tux's screen that tier 3 Gallentean BS is going to be a gate camping ship. Heavy bonuses to sentry drones. /me hides. ñ%#"%"& Poverty
Queen Hades	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:26:00 - [40] I don't care about anything else (4 hi slots? yarr! ) , but please give me a dronebay of 175m¦. Thank you very much.
Morreia	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:30:00 - [41] Edited by: Morreia on 02/06/2006 16:30:41 There is a tech 1 blaster boat in frigs (kinda, but frigs can adapt to most weapons), and cruisers (the thorax if used with rails will just get laughed at) so why shouldn't there be a battleship one.
Serkis	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:42:00 - [42] Poor guy asks if anyone knows or has any idea what its gonna be and according to the replies it will be EW/sniping/blaster/drone pwn mobile with mwd cap bonus and 8-5-8 slot layout. Someone is going to be disappointed when the real stats are official
Tiuwaz	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:44:00 - [43] Originally by: Lathera Hen i think you will get them with kali... but thats just me blabering jiberish... kali brings tier 3 battleships 100% no tech 2 BS Originally by: Oveur This is not the conspiracy you are looking for.
Lathera Hen	Posted - 2006.06.02 16:53:00 - [44] i said i think! any way id love a dev to say somthing in the mater... and kali will bring Ti2 BC's to dont forget that... plus a few other things that some have been dreaming for a long time... and who's to say they wont bring in some plase holder for the T2 BS's
Artica Silverfox	Posted - 2006.06.02 17:57:00 - [45] Originally by: Lathera Hen i said i think! The rest of us know. :)
Talori'i	Posted - 2006.06.02 18:23:00 - [46] Originally by: Serkis Poor guy asks if anyone knows or has any idea what its gonna be and according to the replies it will be EW/sniping/blaster/drone pwn mobile with mwd cap bonus and 8-5-8 slot layout. Someone is going to be disappointed when the real stats are official At least I won't whine about it like the Caldari's and that Railgun platform(bonuses likely to be Optimal and Damage bonus), so it will beat out the megathron as the Sniping railgun platform. So the Megathron will have to be redesigned for more focus on blasters or something. 4 8 15 16 23 42
Letifer Deus	Posted - 2006.06.03 01:24:00 - [47] Edited by: Letifer Deus on 03/06/2006 01:28:17 8-4-8 with 8 turret HP, 125m3 drone bay, 155m/s base speed and 5% dmg, 10% bonus to falloff per level. That is what I want, yarr! "Brought to you by the letter ARRR!"
Kel Shek	Posted - 2006.06.03 01:43:00 - [48] I think the "problem" is that unlike the Caldari one, it doesn't really give away what it is by its appearance. the caldari one LOOKS like a rail boat, for example. the abaddon has obvious places to put turrets... ect. personally I don't expect to have much interest in the Gall third tier BS. alot of people hate the idea but for me it being half turrets half rails, with a decent armor tank, is about the only thing that'd make me not go "meh". that is, since it can't be a plain drone ship without totally obsolete-ifying the dominix. EW would make some sense I guess, but it doesn't interest me. ~~~~~ To see a World in a Grain of Sand And Heaven in a Wild Flower Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour ~~William Blake
Letifer Deus	Posted - 2006.06.03 01:51:00 - [49] Personally I feel a tier 3 gal BS that is strong in missles, or a tier 3 caldari strong in rails is stupid. At the frig level, ok, let the noobs experiment, there isn't a whole lot of skills invested there, but I for one, having near 10 mil in gunnery (and less than 500K in missles) am not going to go train up missle skills just so I can fly a tier 3 gal BS, and I feel many veteran raven pilots will feel the same about a caldari railboat. "Brought to you by the letter ARRR!"
Kel Shek	Posted - 2006.06.03 01:58:00 - [50] Originally by: Letifer Deus Personally I feel a tier 3 gal BS that is strong in missles, or a tier 3 caldari strong in rails is stupid. At the frig level, ok, let the noobs experiment, there isn't a whole lot of skills invested there, but I for one, having near 10 mil in gunnery (and less than 500K in missles) am not going to go train up missle skills just so I can fly a tier 3 gal BS, and I feel many veteran raven pilots will feel the same about a caldari railboat. "vetran" BS pilots will be shy about training cross-racial battleships? wheres it say you have to be able to fly every ship of your race's design, with one set of specializations? wheres it say there can't be racial crossover? I mean look at gallente recon ships, then look at amarr... wtf? ~~~~~ To see a World in a Grain of Sand And Heaven in a Wild Flower Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand And Eternity in an hour ~~William Blake
Xori Ruscuv	Posted - 2006.06.03 02:04:00 - [51] Originally by: Lathera Hen ok i know some of ye want to shoot me now just for metioning it. .... BUT shoots you Quote: i for one that actualy like the damn thing! any ways ... shoots you more Quote: and please dont flame i just want info on it or jsut your thoghts gets out the flame thrower RUN!
Letifer Deus	Posted - 2006.06.03 02:05:00 - [52] A) Recon ships are heavily geared towards cloaking and nos/web/scrambling, so turrets matter far less. B) If it were a mix of turrets and rails, what would the bonuses be? If you make it dmg for turrets and dmg for missles, then something else, such as tracking, range, ect. wont be there. That is why ships generally tend to focus on one weapon type, because it makes their bonuses more effective. "Brought to you by the letter ARRR!"
SpaceDrake Storyteller	Posted - 2006.06.03 02:24:00 - [53] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I saw Tux's screen that tier 3 Gallentean BS is going to be a gate camping ship. Heavy bonuses to sentry drones. /me hides. What I demand a link. A sentry drone ship would be the dumbest thing ever We have that ship already, it's called a fracking Dominix. Please, for the love of the litte baby Jesus child, make it a Sensor Damp boat, possibly with an ECM drone bonus. -------------- What good are actions if there's no one to tell the tale afterward? Player of the character "Andre Ricard".
Xori Ruscuv	Posted - 2006.06.03 02:26:00 - [54] Edited by: Xori Ruscuv on 03/06/2006 02:26:37 Originally by: SpaceDrake Storyteller make it a Sensor Damp boat, possibly with an ECM drone bonus. Ugh It better be CHEAP (around scorp price?), there is no way anyone is going to convince ME to drag a 150mil battleship out to a fleet battle to get called primary.
Letifer Deus	Posted - 2006.06.03 02:39:00 - [55] Edited by: Letifer Deus on 03/06/2006 02:43:54 Well I can't imagine Tier 3 BS being cheaper than tier 2, that seems to be counter-intuitive. Personally, I think the domi does a pretty dang good job at ecm, but I'd rather have an ECM gal BS than a half missle, half turret pos. Still, why not just change the domi turret damage bonus to damper strength bonus and make the tier 3 a blaster boat? Personally, I see it like this: Domi: EW/Drones Mega: Rails Tier3: Blasters "Brought to you by the letter ARRR!"
Kaell Meynn	Posted - 2006.06.03 03:41:00 - [56] Because damper strength is about useless in fleet combat. (you asked) A damper falloff bonus on the domi, I could live with.
Jenny Spitfire	Posted - 2006.06.03 06:49:00 - [57] Originally by: SpaceDrake Storyteller Originally by: Jenny Spitfire I saw Tux's screen that tier 3 Gallentean BS is going to be a gate camping ship. Heavy bonuses to sentry drones. /me hides. What I demand a link. A sentry drone ship would be the dumbest thing ever We have that ship already, it's called a fracking Dominix. Please, for the love of the litte baby Jesus child, make it a Sensor Damp boat, possibly with an ECM drone bonus. Dominix isnt a specialised gate camping ship, is it? ---------------- RecruitMe@NOINT! Originally by: Jenny Spitfire EvE is ecstatically malevolent.
Infel Delria	Posted - 2006.06.03 06:56:00 - [58] the new BS will be based off modeling for the blind.
Morreia	Posted - 2006.06.03 10:12:00 - [59] Well the Domi obviously follows on from the vexor, the Thron follows on from the thorax (well its meant to), so it would kinda make sense to have something follow on from the celestis.
St Dragon	Posted - 2006.06.03 12:19:00 - [60] With those BIG engines i wouldnt be saprised if it got some sort of MWD or Afterburner bonus. ----------------------------------------------- "Kill one man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a god." -- Jean Rostand

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.