| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2472
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 12:40:00 -
[91] - Quote
Hyuni wrote: o7 m8888888888888888 or whatever you pubbies do these days
You happen to be a pubbie and you're being ridiculous no one is losing SP here, smart people are taking advantage of a change to gain SP. This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Proof Highsec reward needs to be nerfed: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 13:28:00 -
[92] - Quote
Tronity Neutronux wrote:
It feels a bit nasty because the dev-blog mislead you to do something dumb. If you had (the pretty easy skilled) Scout Drones already at V it seems you get a gift if you don't skill Combat Drones any further. If you read the dev-blog and skilled Combat Drones to avoid some huge skilltime multiplikation (like in the past with Destroyer or Battle-Cruiser) you did not save but wasted skilltime because the gift after the update is doing the same for you (so you might feel bad now). Anyway I think it's ok without refund and if you have some fresh toon (like me) you could still take advantage from the update.
nobody mislead you in doing something dumb.
it's a Dev. Blog, a thing developers publish to give it's costumer a glimpse of what they're trying to do and for us to give feedbacks and as such are subject to change.
what you did was assume it won't be changed, tried to take advantage of this information and train CDO V. well buddy, you lost, they changed it and there's nothing you can do about it, sorry.
as i've pointed out before, you didn't lose any SP but actually gained some therefore reimbursement is not necessary. Just Add Water |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
3072
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 13:41:00 -
[93] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Hyuni wrote:Really would love to actually hear some kind of official response. They have made an official response. You're not getting free SP. Also, why did you think you would need this? CCP's policy has been "if you can fly now you can fly it after. So, why did you train the skill? Did you think CCP was gonna take away your ability to use drones? They never have and never will.
Ah, no. That is a lie.
I will need Amarr Drone spec to use Curators, and I don't now.
So you either have ether badly misread what the devs said, or you are propagating the lies CCP has stated. Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
4626
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 13:56:00 -
[94] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Rowells wrote:Hyuni wrote:Really would love to actually hear some kind of official response. They have made an official response. You're not getting free SP. Also, why did you think you would need this? CCP's policy has been "if you can fly now you can fly it after. So, why did you train the skill? Did you think CCP was gonna take away your ability to use drones? They never have and never will. Ah, no. That is a lie. I will need Amarr Drone spec to use Curators, and I don't now. So you either have ether badly misread what the devs said, or you are propagating the lies CCP has stated.
Its not even a thing yet and you already are in with "the lies CCP has stated"
Thats poor, even for you. "A naughty sarcastic nun that's come to whip me with a ruler." - Domanique Altares "As Ramona previously mentioned, that is correct." --áISD Supogo |

Tronity Neutronux
Tontauben II
1
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 18:05:00 -
[95] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote: nobody mislead you in doing something dumb.
Well... thx for clearing that up. Why didn't you tell us this before. Oh wait you did?
There is a Dev-Blog? Really?
Quote: well buddy, you lost, they changed it and there's nothing you can do about it, sorry.
No need to apologize. I did not loose SP and could still take advantage from it. Others might still trust the Dev-blog and don't loose something either but waste some time. Since you don't have some serious new content in a thread that looks pretty finished, well... it seems many that write here does not have that much to tell but search for some tears. As I wrote already I think it's not smart but ok and you could still take advantage from it right now. But if it helps you to sleep better: :*( |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
10148
|
Posted - 2014.05.29 18:33:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Rowells wrote:Hyuni wrote:Really would love to actually hear some kind of official response. They have made an official response. You're not getting free SP. Also, why did you think you would need this? CCP's policy has been "if you can fly now you can fly it after. So, why did you train the skill? Did you think CCP was gonna take away your ability to use drones? They never have and never will. Ah, no. That is a lie. I will need Amarr Drone spec to use Curators, and I don't now. So you either have ether badly misread what the devs said, or you are propagating the lies CCP has stated. Its not even a thing yet and you already are in with "the lies CCP has stated" Thats poor, even for you. Well he's actually right for once, as long as you take out the parts about lies.
I guess it's not really a problem though. Sure you'd lose your ability to use T2 [Race] sentry drones. You can regain that in however long it takes you to get the skillbook, plus 20 minutes or so. You'll also be losing quite a bit of DPS but that too can be regained (aside from DPS nerfs intended e.g. on Garde IIs). "Pretty much all 14 of the CSM were in favor of a drone assign nerf for OBVIOUS gameplay reasons" - Sala Cameron
|

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
19
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 11:34:00 -
[97] - Quote
Tronity Neutronux wrote:Nat Silverguard wrote: nobody mislead you in doing something dumb.
Well... thx for clearing that up. Why didn't you tell us this before. Oh wait you did? There is a Dev-Blog? Really? Quote: well buddy, you lost, they changed it and there's nothing you can do about it, sorry.
No need to apologize. I did not loose SP and could still take advantage from it. Others might still trust the Dev-blog and don't loose something either but waste some time. Since you don't have some serious new content in a thread that looks pretty finished, well... it seems many that write here does not have that much to tell but search for some tears. As I wrote already I think it's not smart but ok and you could still take advantage from it right now. But if it helps you to sleep better: :*(
wut?  Just Add Water |

Serene Repose
1358
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 15:03:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Merc wrote:Your alt will receive the Drone Avionics skill with the same number of skill points that Scout Drone Operation has when Kronos lands. Effectively, we're just renaming Scout Drone Operation to Drone Avionics, so you can safely keep that skill in training without losing any progress  I like this response. You do good forum. I hope these cats keep you around. Thanks. Clarity is one of my favs. Simplicity makes it so much better. I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man.-á |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
519
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 17:36:00 -
[99] - Quote
My question is: What's up with those of us who have long had Both skills? Because it seems like people are getting free SP who only had the one skill trained, but those of us who had both are getting left out in the cold. |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
22
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 17:44:00 -
[100] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My question is: What's up with those of us who have long had Both skills? Because it seems like people are getting free SP who only had the one skill trained, but those of us who had both are getting left out in the cold.
if you know how to compute then you'll find out that even if you have both CDO and SDO skills trained to V you'll still get FREE SP come Kronos, well, not as much as those who only have either CDO V or SDO V but you'll still get free SP nonetheless. Just Add Water |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
519
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 17:54:00 -
[101] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My question is: What's up with those of us who have long had Both skills? Because it seems like people are getting free SP who only had the one skill trained, but those of us who had both are getting left out in the cold. if you know how to compute then you'll find out that even if you have both CDO and SDO skills trained to V you'll still get FREE SP come Kronos, well, not as much as those who only have either CDO V or SDO V but you'll still get free SP nonetheless.
No, I understand that, but it seems odd to me that they'd give some people more free SP than others. The fair way to do it would be to give people their new skills, and then reimburse the skill being removed, since those that had it trained took the time from training something else to train that. |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
22
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 18:12:00 -
[102] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:
No, I understand that, but it seems odd to me that they'd give some people more free SP than others. The fair way to do it would be to give people their new skills, and then reimburse the skill being removed, since those that had it trained took the time from training something else to train that.
no it's not odd. the issue here is that you are FIXATED on the amount of SPs that will change and NOT on the attributes/description the (new) skills have and the reason why they are changing the drone skills as a whole.
please, read the new skill's description and look beyond the SP. Just Add Water |

Mag's
the united
17328
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 18:34:00 -
[103] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:Nat Silverguard wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My question is: What's up with those of us who have long had Both skills? Because it seems like people are getting free SP who only had the one skill trained, but those of us who had both are getting left out in the cold. if you know how to compute then you'll find out that even if you have both CDO and SDO skills trained to V you'll still get FREE SP come Kronos, well, not as much as those who only have either CDO V or SDO V but you'll still get free SP nonetheless. No, I understand that, but it seems odd to me that they'd give some people more free SP than others. The fair way to do it would be to give people their new skills, and then reimburse the skill being removed, since those that had it trained took the time from training something else to train that. You get new skills and more SP. You still gain and it sticks to CCPs rule that what you could use before, you can use after.
There is no need for reimbursement, you don't lose anything..
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Komi Toran
Perkone Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 19:11:00 -
[104] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:if you know how to compute then you'll find out that even if you have both CDO and SDO skills trained to V you'll still get FREE SP come Kronos, well, not as much as those who only have either CDO V or SDO V but you'll still get free SP nonetheless. If you have CDO and SDO to V, you get no "free" SP. You retain exactly the same abilities you had before, only now you have an extra 256,000 extra SP to pay for when you get podded.
Really, extra SP that neither improves existing abilities or gives no more flexibility is an added tax, as the only thing raw SP is good for is meeting some corporation's arbitrary entry requirements.
Note: I am not actually complaining about the changes, just pointing out this particuar change isn't CCP giving drone-focused characters free stuff. |

Gavin Dax
Repercussus RAZOR Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 21:26:00 -
[105] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:My question is: What's up with those of us who have long had Both skills? Because it seems like people are getting free SP who only had the one skill trained, but those of us who had both are getting left out in the cold. if you know how to compute then you'll find out that even if you have both CDO and SDO skills trained to V you'll still get FREE SP come Kronos, well, not as much as those who only have either CDO V or SDO V but you'll still get free SP nonetheless.
And this is somehow good?
Borrowing from James' earlier example: A works 4 hours and is paid 5 oranges. B works (same job) for 2 hours but is also paid 5 oranges. Employer decides that from now on, any new people will need to work 5 hours for 5 oranges.
To A: "You still got FREE oranges, well, not as much as B but you still got free oranges nonetheless".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meiU6TxysCg |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22303
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 21:34:00 -
[106] - Quote
Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fair way to do it would be to give people their new skills, and then reimburse the skill being removed, since those that had it trained took the time from training something else to train that. That's so vastly removed from anything GÇ£fairGÇ¥ that it's just laughable. What you're suggesting is giving people who already have more even more. You want to be given 1M free SP for no good reason whatsoever, and screw anyone who hasn't done the same.
No, the fair way of doing it would be to remove all the skills involved and only give you the SP back so that you gain nothing. This would obviously mean that pretty much everyone loses since they can't gain back the abilities they had with the SP they're reimbursed, but that's besides the point GÇö it's the most fair solution.
GǪbut of course, fairness isn't the actual goal here. GÇ£I want free stuffGÇ¥ is the motive behind the nonsensical reimbursement claim (it's nonsensical since GÇ£reimbursementGÇ¥ implies loss, and nothing is lost, only gained). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Gavin Dax
Repercussus RAZOR Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 21:46:00 -
[107] - Quote
Tippia wrote: No, the fair way of doing it would be to remove all the skills involved and only give you the SP back so that you gain nothing. This would obviously mean that pretty much everyone loses since they can't gain back the abilities they had with the SP they're reimbursed, but that's besides the point GÇö it's the most fair solution.
You're absolutely right, except that it's not the most fair solution nor the best way to do it. A better way would be to not remove the old skills until everyone has had enough time to train the new ones. Yes, people would "lose" stuff but that's what the training time nerf in the patch actually is. Obviously though, this would make a lot of people unhappy, although personally I wouldn't have a problem with it.
Tippia wrote: GǪbut of course, fairness isn't the actual goal here. GǣI want free stuffGǥ is the motive behind the nonsensical reimbursement claim (it's nonsensical since GǣreimbursementGǥ implies loss, and nothing is lost, only gained).
This is wrong. You want to believe it's about people saying "I want free stuff" because it makes you feel good to tell those people off. But I'd be willing to bet that most people, like myself, really care about the fairness aspect of this. I think it sets a bad precedent to allow this to happen with skills, and I don't see how it does anything but create a feeling of resentment among the player base. It seems there is a better, more balanced/fair way to make the change that avoids this, so why should it not be done? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22303
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 22:11:00 -
[108] - Quote
Gavin Dax wrote:You're absolutely right, except that it's not the most fair solution nor the best way to do it. It is the most fair solution GÇö everyone stays exactly where they are, time investment-wise GÇö but it is also not even remotely the best way to do it. That's kind of the point: the best way to do it would not be fair, and you can choose one or the other.
The other point is that the whole appeal to fairness is just silly, since it is always accompanied with a suggestion that is as far away from fair as possible (such as the GÇ£reimbursementGÇ¥ idea GÇö yes, let's give someone 756k SP on top of the 256k SP he has already been given on top of not losing any abilitiesGǪ that's GÇ£fairGÇ¥ ).
Quote:This is wrong. You want to believe it's about people saying "I want free stuff" because it makes you feel good to tell those people off. Actually, I'd prefer not to believe it, but if you pull apart the arguments, it's what you end up with. They want free SP because someone else got more bound SP than they did (and the distinction between free and bound is not just a play on words here, but a key component in what they're actually asking for).
If they actually cared about fairness, they wouldn't try to get even more out of a situation they're already gaining from. They'd instead try to ensure that everyone gains equally. Not just the ones who have drone skills trained GÇö everyone.
Quote:I think it sets a bad precedent to allow this to happen with skills, and I don't see how it does anything but create a feeling of resentment among the player base. It's not a bad precedent though. Everyone gains from it except the ones who have no stake in the game. It hits people who were speculating on the change without reading up on the details, but hey, that's just how speculation turns out sometimes GÇö teaching people what happens when you do that is hardly a bad precedent. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Gavin Dax
Repercussus RAZOR Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 22:43:00 -
[109] - Quote
Tippia wrote: If they actually cared about fairness, they wouldn't try to get even more out of a situation they're already gaining from.
People don't behave like this. If someone gets more than you, it doesn't matter that you're both "getting something" if you get short-changed. You'll generally feel it's unfair unless the difference is small in comparison. There is a good reason for that, too.
Tippia wrote: It's not a bad precedent though. Everyone gains from it except the ones who have no stake in the game. It hits people who were speculating on the change without reading up on the details, but hey, that's just how speculation turns out sometimes GÇö teaching people what happens when you do that is hardly a bad precedent.
Well, I'll leave it to the reader to decide whether or not skill training should be similar to market speculation and whether or not this is a good thing for the game. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
22304
|
Posted - 2014.05.31 23:25:00 -
[110] - Quote
Gavin Dax wrote:People don't behave like this. If someone gets more than you, it doesn't matter that you're both "getting something" if you get short-changed. You'll generally feel it's unfair unless the difference is small in comparison. There is a good reason for that, too. Sure, but that's pretty much exactly why the fairness argument falls flat on its face GÇö it's about something rather different that sounds a lot more petty if you actually express what it is. 
Quote:Well, I'll leave it to the reader to decide whether or not skill training should be similar to market speculation and whether or not this is a good thing for the game. Skill training as a whole, no. But speculating on dev blogs will always be the same regardless of what GÇ£currencyGÇ¥ it is you're betting. No matter what, it's subject to change up until it has been successfully deployed on TQ so any decision made on the basis of that information runs the risk of being completely nullified. It's just the nature of betting on an uncertain development. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: Newbie skill plan 2.1. |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
24
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 08:40:00 -
[111] - Quote
Komi Toran wrote: If you have CDO and SDO to V, you get no "free" SP. You retain exactly the same abilities you had before, only now you have an extra 256,000 extra SP to pay for when you get podded.
Really, extra SP that neither improves existing abilities or gives no more flexibility is an added tax, as the only thing raw SP is good for is meeting some corporation's arbitrary entry requirements.
Note: I am not actually complaining about the changes, just pointing out this particuar change isn't CCP giving drone-focused characters free stuff.
but the point still stands that nothing was taken away from you and you are NOT entitled to any SP reimbursement whatsoever.
Gavin Dax wrote: And this is somehow good?
Borrowing from James' earlier example: A works 4 hours and is paid 5 oranges. B works (same job) for 2 hours but is also paid 5 oranges. Employer decides that from now on, any new people will need to work 5 hours for 5 oranges.
then don't accept the job? the employer has the very right what he can offer to you as salary as long as you accept it. do you honestly believe that in your office/work that all of the people working on the same level are receiving the same salary, benefits and perks? the top boss' sexytary is receiving waaaaay more than a project manager, i garen-tee you. 
Gavin Dax wrote:
To A: "You still got FREE oranges, well, not as much as B but you still got free oranges nonetheless".
and your point is? as you admitted you still get free oranges, why are you asking for more when you only get it for free? this is just being greedy man.
it will not make any difference if all of us has the same skills, if you're good you'll win. Just Add Water |

Gavin Dax
Repercussus RAZOR Alliance
31
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 14:42:00 -
[112] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote: then don't accept the job? the employer has the very right what he can offer to you as salary as long as you accept it. do you honestly believe that in your office/work that all of the people working on the same level are receiving the same salary, benefits and perks? the top boss' sexytary is receiving waaaaay more than a project manager, i garen-tee you.
Nobody is saying CCP doesn't have the right to make this change. They do obviously. The question is whether or not there is a better way to do it. There is.
And in your example, that's great that people are paid unequally for doing the same job. It happens yes, so what's your point? You think this is a good thing?
Nat Silverguard wrote: and your point is? as you admitted you still get free oranges, why are you asking for more when you only get it for free? this is just being greedy man.
Asking for the same thing as someone else is not being greedy, it's asking for the same thing as someone else. We have 3 people, A, B, and C. They are paid for the same task as follows: A -> $100 B -> $200 C -> $50
A complains he doesn't get as much as B. But he's getting more than C! So you think this is being greedy? You think A should just be quiet because C is getting even less? What a great world we would live in if all people thought this way...
Yes, it's wrong C gets less. It doesn't make it right for A to get paid less as well if it can be avoided. |

Suitonia
Path of Radiance HYDRA RELOADED
253
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 15:19:00 -
[113] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Cygnet Lythanea wrote:The fair way to do it would be to give people their new skills, and then reimburse the skill being removed, since those that had it trained took the time from training something else to train that. That's so vastly removed from anything GÇ£fairGÇ¥ that it's just laughable. What you're suggesting is giving people who already have more even more. You want to be given 1M free SP for no good reason whatsoever, and screw anyone who hasn't done the same. No, the fair way of doing it would be to remove all the skills involved and only give you the SP back so that you gain nothing. This would obviously mean that pretty much everyone loses since they can't gain back the abilities they had with the SP they're reimbursed, but that's besides the point GÇö it's the most fair solution. GǪbut of course, fairness isn't the actual goal here. GÇ£I want free stuffGÇ¥ is the motive behind the nonsensical reimbursement claim (it's nonsensical since GÇ£reimbursementGÇ¥ implies loss, and nothing is lost, only gained).
It's 512,000 SP (Not 1mil SP) If you have CDO and SCO to 5. (Since you are basically losing any/all investment you put in to CDO which is a rank 2 skill). The Skill is essentially being completely removed for all intents and purposes. Additionally, your clone cost is now going up without any added benefit. So if you trained CDO at all and got little or no benefit on TQ with that skill you have lost.
In the past CCP have always reimbursed skill training to the highest amount possible (BC + Destroyer split, learning skill removal, Social Skill changes etc.) I think because of CCP's past behavior, and trend. A lot of people decided to train CDO before the patch (And as posted in CCP's original dev blog and forum thread, and it wasn't updated, only mentioned in a dev post 20 pages into a thread). And unfortunately, all of those pilots have now completely lost out, to say, if they trained something else. Claiming that they are still 'not losing anything' is akin to saying 'I mined and built my drake myself, so when I lost it, I lost nothing because it was free'. You lost out on the opportunity cost of potentially 7-10 days (depending on remap/attributes) you spent skilling Combat Drone Operation instead of another skill.
Contributer to Eve is Easy:-á https://www.youtube.com/user/eveiseasy/videos
Check out my PvP Rifter guide for new players; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YReUNRTGcXo |

Komi Toran
Perkone Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 17:20:00 -
[114] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:[quote=Komi Toran]but the point still stands that nothing was taken away from you... If by "nothing" you mean ISK, you are correct.
And I'll stay out of the argument for SP reimbursement. |

flakeys
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
2198
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 18:47:00 -
[115] - Quote
Fabulous Rod wrote:Hyuni wrote:CCP Merc wrote:Chris Winter wrote: That would mean that the OP should get Light Drone Operation and Medium Drone Operation to partway through level V as well...
That's right, assuming of course he doesn't have Combat Drone Operation trained to V. When we determine which of the two skills (Scout and Combat Drone Operation) is higher we take into account any partial training and apply it to the new skills as well. So after trying to catch up and skimming the 50 page original thread, what I'm getting is that if we spent an extra week training both skills to V because the dev blog said we should, we're just out of luck and wasted a week of training? Is that correct? yes, and no word on SP reimbursement.
OH MY GOD a WHOLE week of training wasted ..... the horrors CCP plays on us .Wish you guys had played SWG years back , you had 2 weeks rollback meaning you had litteraly lost everything you did in those 2 weeks.
My guess is since a lot of people complained about ''omg i trained X drone to V and not Y drone to V because of thread X i now don't have the max skill needed for the change.So they changed it so wichever of both you have to V works fine BUT this being a game of EVE players offcourse that won't do because now you'll get the ''OMG because of thread X or Y i specifically trained droneskill Z and droneskills X to max level and as such wasted a week of skilltraining''.
I think we can say with a fair certainty that the eve playerbase is one of the hardest to please . Hell , sometimes i even get the feeling my wife is easier to please and trust me that says a LOT about us as a playerbase , and yes i specifically say US because i'm just a whiny little bastard like most of you at times ...
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
|

Suitonia
Path of Radiance HYDRA RELOADED
254
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 19:54:00 -
[116] - Quote
flakeys wrote:
OH MY GOD a WHOLE week of training wasted ..... the horrors CCP plays on us .Wish you guys had played SWG years back , you had 2 weeks rollback meaning you had litteraly lost everything you did in those 2 weeks.
My guess is since a lot of people complained about ''omg i trained X drone to V and not Y drone to V because of thread X i now don't have the max skill needed for the change.So they changed it so wichever of both you have to V works fine BUT this being a game of EVE players offcourse that won't do because now you'll get the ''OMG because of thread X or Y i specifically trained droneskill Z and droneskills X to max level and as such wasted a week of skilltraining''.
I think we can say with a fair certainty that the eve playerbase is one of the hardest to please . Hell , sometimes i even get the feeling my wife is easier to please and trust me that says a LOT about us as a playerbase , and yes i specifically say US because i'm just a whiny little bastard like most of you at times ...
Why should people just 'accept' a week of opportunity cost training wasted. Server Rollbacks were a problem and I'm sure SOE would have liked to avoid those as much as possible. Unlike that time, This matter is entirely in CCPs hands.
CCP have always reimbursed skill training from skill changes to the highest possible amount, See: Battlecruiser/Destroyer changes, learning skill changes, social skill changes etc. They are now somewhat departing from that. It's pretty clear that a decent amount of players have lost out on a weeks training time because of this somewhat unclear change, until the devblog was edited, this was in page 20 of a feedback thread without the OP being updated.
Contributer to Eve is Easy:-á https://www.youtube.com/user/eveiseasy/videos
Check out my PvP Rifter guide for new players; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YReUNRTGcXo |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15723
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 20:06:00 -
[117] - Quote
Well you've only got 2 more days to complain about it, so I hope you've stocked up on red bull or mountain dew "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his ISK/hr depends upon his not understanding it!" |

Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
709
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 20:17:00 -
[118] - Quote
Suitonia wrote:Why should people just 'accept' a week of opportunity cost training wasted. Server Rollbacks were a problem and I'm sure SOE would have liked to avoid those as much as possible. Unlike that time, This matter is entirely in CCPs hands.
CCP have always reimbursed skill training from skill changes to the highest possible amount, See: Battlecruiser/Destroyer changes, learning skill changes, social skill changes etc. They are now somewhat departing from that. It's pretty clear that a decent amount of players have lost out on a weeks training time because of this somewhat unclear change, until the devblog was edited, this was in page 20 of a feedback thread without the OP being updated. How about we look into this "reimbursement" CCP has always done.
Destroyer/Battlecruiser changes: Skill was split into 4 different ones ( for good reason) and you got equal amount in all 4 based on original skill level. Any reimbursement? nope.
Learning skills: Completely removed and no replacement skill. SP reimbursed. It doesn't matter if everyone got the bonus or if CCP said "f*ck it we're lowering everyone's attribute levels" you still would have gotten reimbursement no matter what the following change was.
Social skills: I can't remember what happened and can't find the blog but I'll be willing to bet they followed the same patterns as before.
Wasted SP on proposed skill changes? That's not anyone's problem but your own. If you decide to speculate on proposed changes before they are launched in order to take advantage of free SP (or lucrative market deals in some cases) and lose out, that is your problem. It's a risk you took and if it backfired, that's how risks work. No different than real life speculation.
And on the CDO/SDO changes: They didnt have may options when it came to a fair way to split the skills into medium and small scout drones. Rather than tying the medium and/or small skills to one or the other in which case, somebody would lose out no matter what, they tied it to the highest of both. If you had both to V you will experience no change. If you didnt have V in both you will only benefit. Because it is entirely possible someone has one or the other to IV and would get screwed in the change.
The biggest reason CCP isn't reimbursing SP is because that would imply that someone lost SP, like the learning skill changes. With this system nobody lost and some people gained, so there is nothing to give back.
If you had both to V then nothing was gained, nothing was lost, stop asking for free stuff, carry on with your life. |

Suitonia
Path of Radiance HYDRA RELOADED
254
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 20:45:00 -
[119] - Quote
I trained CDO V more than 3 years ago, Just FYI. I have more than got use out of that skill.
I think any skill changes where someone *loses out* over another person, even if it's an opportunity cost. Based on changes made to the skill system is bad. I've seen a lot of people in the Rookie Chat and Help channels advising new players to train both Scout Drone Operation V and Combat Drone Operation V. I would really hate to see new players suffer as a result of what would be otherwise, sound advice. Contributer to Eve is Easy:-á https://www.youtube.com/user/eveiseasy/videos
Check out my PvP Rifter guide for new players; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YReUNRTGcXo |

Marsha Mallow
854
|
Posted - 2014.06.01 20:48:00 -
[120] - Quote
People come out with all sorts of rubbish in rookie chat. Tough luck.
Btw I think they should 'accidentally' code the drones to awox anyone seriously griping about this after the patch. Only for a month or so. TO THE RIPARDMOBILE! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |