| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 04:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
You guys gave heavy impressions during the summer that this expansion was going to have massive redistribution. But, on the crucible page, there wasn't anything about it and you've been mum on the topic. Any change to the plan?
Edit: By you guys, I mean CCP. |

Shivus Tao
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
60
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 04:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
It would be nice even if the initial redistribution is just temporary. The systems with terrible sec status and thus not worth putting military upgrades in need something to make them actually worth holding and populating. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shivus Tao wrote:It would be nice even if the initial redistribution is just temporary. The systems with terrible sec status and thus not worth putting military upgrades in need something to make them actually worth holding and populating.
Well there was a dev blog about it before the new forums. They were really excited about it. CCP Soundwave even described it as more focused on industry changes than anything else in a video. But, then everything just dropped off the radar. With Crucible coming out on the 29th, you'd expect to hear something |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
848
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever |

Assagai Invari
Vindicator Corporation Strategic Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever
Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining. "Wives are just Tech 2 girlfriends...cost more, higher resists, stricter fitting requirements, and they use more powergrid." - Admiral Castine. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining.
yeah but moving it to null does the exact same thing.
Anybody remember this dev blog?
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=946
ole source of ice and high-end minerals For further discussion. Nullsec should be the only place we're injecting (at least some of the) ices, zydrine, megacyte and morphite into the game. This ensures that nullsec mining retains a unique value proposition, and guarantees that mining time for these types is priced according the risk and effort involved in nullsec extraction. |

Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
171
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 05:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
it was listed as CONSIDERED, not "we're doing this", not even "we might do this" but simply "it was an idea bounced around"
MM Bombers, Best Bombers |

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
175
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 08:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
You people are ******* dense.
For a game that prides itself on attracting the smartest and hardest MMO gamers, you're all acting pretty dumb.
Only Denidil above me understands what CCP was talking about. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
172
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 09:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:You people are ******* dense. Denidil wrote:it was listed as CONSIDERED, not "we're doing this", not even "we might do this" but simply "it was an idea bounced around"
QFT this Pretty sure they will not remove every thing IF they ever did would be a hillarious sight all those cap pilots mining their own ice I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 10:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
I distinctly remember CCP Soundwave, in a YouTube video, describing this as being a heavy industry change (think it was an AT video). |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
1184
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 10:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining. yeah but moving it to null does the exact same thing. Anybody remember this dev blog? http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=946ole source of ice and high-end minerals For further discussion. Nullsec should be the only place we're injecting (at least some of the) ices, zydrine, megacyte and morphite into the game. This ensures that nullsec mining retains a unique value proposition, and guarantees that mining time for these types is priced according the risk and effort involved in nullsec extraction.
It was never about moving all Ice out of hi-sec, only about leaving only the lowest value ice in hi-sec. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 10:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining. yeah but moving it to null does the exact same thing. Anybody remember this dev blog? http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=946ole source of ice and high-end minerals For further discussion. Nullsec should be the only place we're injecting (at least some of the) ices, zydrine, megacyte and morphite into the game. This ensures that nullsec mining retains a unique value proposition, and guarantees that mining time for these types is priced according the risk and effort involved in nullsec extraction. It was never about moving all Ice out of hi-sec, only about leaving only the lowest value ice in hi-sec.
That's actually the case already. All there are in highsec is racial cubes, the lowest value ice. However, so many people in highsec mine and bot it, it has kept the isotope price very low. |

Dradius Calvantia
Creative Cookie Procuring Rote Kapelle
131
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 10:58:00 -
[13] - Quote
Moving ICE to null allows easier botting. Mining in H sec is way more risky than mining in Null.
A correctly set up ICE mining operation in any Null sec system allows 100% risk free ICE mining.
The only way to stop this is an AFK cloaker in system.. but you still will not get kills, just prevent them from mining. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 10:59:00 -
[14] - Quote
Dradius Calvantia wrote:Moving ICE to null allows easier botting. Mining in H sec is way more risky than mining in Null.
A correctly set up ICE mining operation in any Null sec system allows 100% risk free ICE mining.
The only way to stop this is an AFK cloaker in system.. but you still will not get kills, just prevent them from mining.
Please, preventing mining is a passive economic warfare. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
208
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 11:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:You guys gave heavy impressions during the summer that this expansion was going to have massive redistribution. But, on the crucible page, there wasn't anything about it and you've been mum on the topic. Any change to the plan?
Why should it change?
Why should ice go to null?
How many numbers or graphics are public about the number of bots in high sec or low/null sec mining this one and the real in game impact, not just "words" from nerds that spend all day in front of their computer and think their pod is their real life...
Then without miners in high sec, how Goons could possibly make sort that ganking mechanics change, or force Concord reinforcement so high sec becomes more boring than ever and null sec less appealing than it ever bean?
Very sure there are a few mechanics they're willing to force CCP to change that, they just figured that pissing off the biggest number of players and make them unsub was the best way to model the game has THEY want, and they made it.
Yada yada yada... |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
568
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 11:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
Shivus Tao wrote:It would be nice even if the initial redistribution is just temporary. The systems with terrible sec status and thus not worth putting military upgrades in need something to make them actually worth holding and populating.
Don't be stupid. It would crush the economy. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
289
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
I was never intended to move to null only.
The only thing they thought about was changing the belts to be exhaustible. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:13:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:I was never intended to move to null only.
The only thing they thought about was changing the belts to be exhaustible.
Do you have a source proving this? |

baltec1
196
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dradius Calvantia wrote:Moving ICE to null allows easier botting. Mining in H sec is way more risky than mining in Null.
A correctly set up ICE mining operation in any Null sec system allows 100% risk free ICE mining.
The only way to stop this is an AFK cloaker in system.. but you still will not get kills, just prevent them from mining.
You don't need kills to win a fight. |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
89
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:30:00 -
[20] - Quote
I doubt CCP would move all Ice to null, unless they also put ice in wormhole exploration sites. WHs are very dependent on ice products being widley available all over high sec. If ice were only in null, then ice would likely end up with much fewer distribution points on the markets, the major trade hubs.
Not only is that not good for the WH life style, it reduces the market dynamics of the game, reduces game play options, makes Eve more bland. Personaly I am too lazy to bother with it, but I know a number of people that ship ice products to regions far and wide. They can make a profit doing this because ice products are all over the place, there is enough varinace in distribution and potential transaction cost to make it worth while.
If the sources were only in null, then the majority of the transaction cost would be consumed in getting it to the major trade hubs and there would be little left for the high sec transportation trade players - their incentive to redistribute would be much reduced. |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
223
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining.
nah it more to do with the fact that in 0.0 you have intel channels to warn you if goons are coming... in high sec its alot harder to spot goons coming because you have to constantly scroll up n down through the list of 100+ mining bots in the local list to see if a goon is somewhere in there. Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 12:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Adunh Slavy wrote:I doubt CCP would move all Ice to null, unless they also put ice in wormhole exploration sites. WHs are very dependent on ice products being widley available all over high sec. If ice were only in null, then ice would likely end up with much fewer distribution points on the markets, the major trade hubs.
Not only is that not good for the WH life style, it reduces the market dynamics of the game, reduces game play options, makes Eve more bland. Personaly I am too lazy to bother with it, but I know a number of people that ship ice products to regions far and wide. They can make a profit doing this because ice products are all over the place, there is enough varinace in distribution and potential transaction cost to make it worth while.
If the sources were only in null, then the majority of the transaction cost would be consumed in getting it to the major trade hubs and there would be little left for the high sec transportation trade players - their incentive to redistribute would be much reduced.
To your point, I'd like to point out that people would still ship ice they'd just be at the major trade hubs and far more expensive. As is, most people who use isotopes, heavy water, and sodium chlorides already buy from the major trade hubs in bulk and ship it tot heir home, whether that be 1 jump from highsec, or deep in sov territory. |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
569
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 13:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:Adunh Slavy wrote:I doubt CCP would move all Ice to null, unless they also put ice in wormhole exploration sites. WHs are very dependent on ice products being widley available all over high sec. If ice were only in null, then ice would likely end up with much fewer distribution points on the markets, the major trade hubs.
Not only is that not good for the WH life style, it reduces the market dynamics of the game, reduces game play options, makes Eve more bland. Personaly I am too lazy to bother with it, but I know a number of people that ship ice products to regions far and wide. They can make a profit doing this because ice products are all over the place, there is enough varinace in distribution and potential transaction cost to make it worth while.
If the sources were only in null, then the majority of the transaction cost would be consumed in getting it to the major trade hubs and there would be little left for the high sec transportation trade players - their incentive to redistribute would be much reduced. To your point, I'd like to point out that people would still ship ice they'd just be at the major trade hubs and far more expensive. As is, most people who use isotopes, heavy water, and sodium chlorides already buy from the major trade hubs in bulk and ship it tot heir home, whether that be 1 jump from highsec, or deep in sov territory.
It's not as simple as you think. High sec ice miners won't go to null or even low to mine ice... if that's what they wanted to do they'd already be there. As such, the market would dry up considerably, making it prohibitively expensive to maintain a pos. Smaller high sec and wormhole corps wouldn't be able to afford their pos anymore, and as a restult all that research being done, all that T3 production, would grind to a halt causing secondary market effects, like Tengus skyrocketing in price. On top of the incoming PI nerfs (PCOs and the impending spike in PI products) and pos fuel changes there would be too much chaos for the markets to properly absorb.
It would, simply put, break Eve. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 13:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:Adunh Slavy wrote:I doubt CCP would move all Ice to null, unless they also put ice in wormhole exploration sites. WHs are very dependent on ice products being widley available all over high sec. If ice were only in null, then ice would likely end up with much fewer distribution points on the markets, the major trade hubs.
Not only is that not good for the WH life style, it reduces the market dynamics of the game, reduces game play options, makes Eve more bland. Personaly I am too lazy to bother with it, but I know a number of people that ship ice products to regions far and wide. They can make a profit doing this because ice products are all over the place, there is enough varinace in distribution and potential transaction cost to make it worth while.
If the sources were only in null, then the majority of the transaction cost would be consumed in getting it to the major trade hubs and there would be little left for the high sec transportation trade players - their incentive to redistribute would be much reduced. To your point, I'd like to point out that people would still ship ice they'd just be at the major trade hubs and far more expensive. As is, most people who use isotopes, heavy water, and sodium chlorides already buy from the major trade hubs in bulk and ship it tot heir home, whether that be 1 jump from highsec, or deep in sov territory. It's not as simple as you think. High sec ice miners won't go to null or even low to mine ice... if that's what they wanted to do they'd already be there. As such, the market would dry up considerably, making it prohibitively expensive to maintain a pos. Smaller high sec and wormhole corps wouldn't be able to afford their pos anymore, and as a restult all that research being done, all that T3 production, would grind to a halt causing secondary market effects, like Tengus skyrocketing in price. On top of the incoming PI nerfs (PCOs and the impending spike in PI products) and pos fuel changes there would be too much chaos for the markets to properly absorb. It would, simply put, break Eve.
Well yes but you're also forgetting that it'd help smaller alliances break into null. I mean imagine that oxygen isotopes, for example, reached 5,000 ipu.An erebus need 1,000 isotopes to make 1 jump without skills. 750 to make it with max fuel skills. So it'd, for example, cost 37.5 million isk to move the titan once. Which means alliances aren't going to deploy 33 titans (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDME4zZdMQ&feature=related) into an engagement over a -0.3 systems without good moon stuff. As it is now, big alliances will go over to a 1 system corp/alliance just because they can (Example TEST on Chirbba). As CCP Soundwave said, Ice is like oil. And alliances would have to consider the systems they want to deploy caps/super caps over more.
As for highsec research, frankly I think highsec should be such a ***** to live in. If they want to research a BP, they have to use the station queues or they have to move to low sec. Also, I'd like to point out the fact that Eve existed as a game long before there were jump drives. |

Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
570
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 13:54:00 -
[25] - Quote
Acac Sunflyier wrote:Well yes but you're also forgetting that it'd help smaller alliances break into null. I mean imagine that oxygen isotopes, for example, reached 5,000 ipu.An erebus need 1,000 isotopes to make 1 jump without skills. 750 to make it with max fuel skills. So it'd, for example, cost 37.5 million isk to move the titan once. Which means alliances aren't going to deploy 33 titans (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDME4zZdMQ&feature=related) into an engagement over a -0.3 systems without good moon stuff. As it is now, big alliances will go over to a 1 system corp/alliance just because they can (Example TEST on Chirbba). As CCP Soundwave said, Ice is like oil. And alliances would have to consider the systems they want to deploy caps/super caps over more.
As for highsec research, frankly I think highsec should be such a ***** to live in. If they want to research a BP, they have to use the station queues or they have to move to low sec. Also, I'd like to point out the fact that Eve existed as a game long before there were jump drives.
No it wouldn't. Smaller alliances would still be targets... and the ice fields would tell everyone where those juicy, carebear targets are. How many supercap hotdrops on the macks would it take, do you think, before they say "screw this" and head back to high? People aren't there for a reason, and that reason isn't the lack of things to do to make isk.
Your opinion, by the way, on high sec is irrelevant when you consider the numbers of paying subscribers in high sec that disagree with you. You break high sec, you break Eve, and people leave. This is bad for the game as a whole. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 14:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Ingvar Angst wrote:Acac Sunflyier wrote:Well yes but you're also forgetting that it'd help smaller alliances break into null. I mean imagine that oxygen isotopes, for example, reached 5,000 ipu.An erebus need 1,000 isotopes to make 1 jump without skills. 750 to make it with max fuel skills. So it'd, for example, cost 37.5 million isk to move the titan once. Which means alliances aren't going to deploy 33 titans (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZDME4zZdMQ&feature=related) into an engagement over a -0.3 systems without good moon stuff. As it is now, big alliances will go over to a 1 system corp/alliance just because they can (Example TEST on Chirbba). As CCP Soundwave said, Ice is like oil. And alliances would have to consider the systems they want to deploy caps/super caps over more.
As for highsec research, frankly I think highsec should be such a ***** to live in. If they want to research a BP, they have to use the station queues or they have to move to low sec. Also, I'd like to point out the fact that Eve existed as a game long before there were jump drives. No it wouldn't. Smaller alliances would still be targets... and the ice fields would tell everyone where those juicy, carebear targets are. How many supercap hotdrops on the macks would it take, do you think, before they say "screw this" and head back to high? People aren't there for a reason, and that reason isn't the lack of things to do to make isk. Your opinion, by the way, on high sec is irrelevant when you consider the numbers of paying subscribers in high sec that disagree with you. You break high sec, you break Eve, and people leave. This is bad for the game as a whole.
Well of course they'd tell where they are. Ice fields would be great ways to start attacking bigger alliances. They'd need to figure out ways to defend them. It'd be great. If they're bots, then they're really not going to care. In 00, you buy a ship already expecting to loose it. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
194
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 14:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
They should put ice in W-space with outposts and moon goo. Then we can forget about null sec completely, big waste of space, good dumping ground for some types of players.  Ideas and stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 15:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:They should put ice in W-space with outposts and moon goo. Then we can forget about null sec completely, big waste of space, good dumping ground for some types of players. 
TBH i'm not sure there are belts in worm space as I am not a resident of worm space. But I mean I don't see how that could be too far fetched to put ice in worm space, as it is a 00 system. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 15:57:00 -
[29] - Quote
David Grogan wrote:Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining. nah it more to do with the fact that in 0.0 you have intel channels to warn you if goons are coming... in high sec its alot harder to spot goons coming because you have to constantly scroll up n down through the list of 100+ mining bots in the local list to see if a goon is somewhere in there. let me let you in on a secret
is there blue ice on your overview?
then the goons are coming
presto problem solved |

Acac Sunflyier
Burning Star L.L.C.
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 16:02:00 -
[30] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:David Grogan wrote:Assagai Invari wrote:Andski wrote:i hope not, we want high-sec ice to stay there forever Quite right, because at least it gives the Goons something to do and forces miners to be aware rather than AFK mining. nah it more to do with the fact that in 0.0 you have intel channels to warn you if goons are coming... in high sec its alot harder to spot goons coming because you have to constantly scroll up n down through the list of 100+ mining bots in the local list to see if a goon is somewhere in there. let me let you in on a secret is there blue ice on your overview? then the goons are coming presto problem solved
Isn't the whole reason behind this the belief that blue ice is moving to goon/test space and they want to set the prices? |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |