So basically nothing will change and thanks for pointing out that any change suggested by CFC should be thrown away, since you spend most of your time in High Sec, Grinding LVL 4 missions.

The absolute best change you can make to SOV is make all resources finite.

(You'll see more PVP and SOV warfare in this game in the first month after that change than the first 11 years combined)

I'd prefer to see the anom system changed to allow more than 10 in a system through more anoms/sigs & multiple objectives per anom that need simultaneous completion to make fleeting a valid way of doing anoms.
My personal number would be 100 active pilots doing combat stuff in the system still being viable. Though maybe not at 'perfect' efficiency. (assuming full indexes & upgrades)

Then extend that higher concentration at once back up through the system to high sec and once it works, missions can be slowly phased out.

Rather than extending the 'infinite number of pilots at once' into Null. Perpetuating a bad system.
(Though Null already can support an infinite number of pilots at once in a single system, they just all have to be miners)

My view about SOV missions :
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4874225#post4874225

Pandemic Legions spot by the Mittanis fire is kept warm at all times. ie the 2 power arrangement is not a 1 power arrangement because the playerbase wills it to be so. CCP lost control of proceedings years ago. If the playerbase can decide there will be 2 powers, then the playerbase can decide there will be 3 powers. Also I'd expect that out of 13 or whatever it is CFC alliances, one of them will eventually want to play dangerous, or individual corps within the alliances will want to move to play dangerous. The fate of Gentlemans Agreement awaits those that won't.

I also don't see why anyone cares whether or not an invasion succeeds the first time, or where it is, it just needs to happen. The first weeks of an invasion, when outcomes are not certain must surely be the best part of the game and the whole playerbase denying itself the best part of the game seems bizzare to me.

Current anomalies generate isk , and still this is the safest thing CCP can implement.
You cannot put any current agent type or any LP to this system into this system as it would become worthless in very short time.

If you put higsec factions to SOV missions : higsec players become hit very fast also FW.
You cannot put there NPC Nullsec factions : as this will hit people sitting in NPC nullspace , and many people will have objections because doing this missions will ruin access to higsec missions.

Value of those NPC Faction LP will drop very , very fast. if whole north start to make guristas missions, then soon their LP value will be around 300-500isk per LP.
People will be angry that missions in SOV are worthless and don't provide isk for new ships.

You are wrong.
CCP will loose again, as nodes will die.
More likely we will have something like HED rather than next B-R.

Nah, you won that war, PL was broken from the perspective that they simply could not throw the remaining supers under the bus, and remain existentially PL. They would not have used them, if you'd continued to move up.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not criticizing the decision to stop, I'm just pointing out that PL is not comfortable as an organization deploying its last fleet (even if individuals will risk a super or titan that won't be reimbursed) and would therefore have let you take any objective you desired.

That position PL found itself in was a risk of choosing to not fight on your side, even though that option probably always has been available to them, and if the CFC was broken up, and goonswarm faced an existential threat alone, we would see a different choice from PL.

titans and supers are not really the OT.. but meh.

On suggestion i have liked is that you jump with the bridge. That is you bridge other ships by getting dragged along with the titan.
That way there is the risk reward thing again. You have to risk the titan to bridge with a titan.

Yes it is.
1. Well placed titan can have range to 3 or more regions.
This means that your sphere of influence just grow to 3 regions because of 1 ship capabilities , especially when you put in each of those regions additional titan.
2. It allows to drop any one in titan range without having this party time to react.

Pulling titan along with the fleet is good ... and at the same time very bad idea.
Why?

Because this will lead to even more bloobs overloading nodes almost each time.
Why?
You will use bridging when you will be forced to do it.
This will aslo mean that enemy will be capable of achieving some objective you are not to happy about.
You will drop as many ships as you can , not only to block enemy from doing something , but also defend the titans.
1 for each fleet you bridge.

Solution is still the same.
CCP have to change jump drives, titan bridges and jump bridges at the same time.

This is untrue. "small organizations" disrupt bigger ones all the time in small ways. Just look at any global kill board and cross reference null systems where lots of rats are killed. Or hell, just go on EVE-kill and look up Thanatos loses lol. When i was in INIT, our null sec home constellation was camped a LOT and hot drops happened. Those mercenaries SHUT DOWN our ability to farm our null sec holdings.

IMO It has nothing to do with the power of small organizations, it has everything to do with the fact that when people DO disrupt your null groups grunt level pve activities, you just log in your high sec alt and keep going in safety. That's why this didn't work:

in other words, the key to a better null is to nerf high sec into the ground Ok, I'm kidding, but EVE is interconnected, as long as people can make good enough isk to survive via alts in 'safe' conditions, there is no reason for conflict in null (other than boredom) and no way a 'small organization' can have the kind of impact you desire.

Also, see how the 'problem' defies simple thinking and simple fixes. You made up your mind that you know what the problem is when in fact the problem is complex and none of us have a total grasp of it. I sure don't.

Oh I know, but if you let any null station have agents, well, alliances will spread them all over everywhere (like anoms).

What stops a powerful alliance/coalition from simple denying space to other folks.