| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
   |
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:45:00 -
[1]
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations 
Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE. |
Yarek Balear
Black Omega Security
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:47:00 -
[2]
Is that the record for the most losses to a Login trap that you're referring to ? ;)
|
Khirzan Wolfson
The Taining corp
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:48:00 -
[3]
is this confirmable?
-KW
Co-Ceo,The T
KOS Diplomat |
Soraya Silvermoon
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:48:00 -
[4]
just heard the news :)
Got only one thing to say...
aaaaaaaaaaaahhahahahahahaahahhaha!!!!!!!
Congrats and good job!
|
Karunel
Nuevos Horizontes
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:50:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Karunel on 23/07/2006 00:51:05
If that's a log in trap, no congrats for you. Actually I'd hope ERA got their dreads back, because log-in traps are IMHO, total exploits.
Otherwise, GJ. 
Edit: At least you didn't log-in on top of them, semi-grats. 
|
The Slayer
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:50:00 -
[6]
No this is totally false. It was 11 dreads. RA logged on a 12 dread 10 carrier fleet and cynoed to us when we were attacking one of their stations. Most effective log on trap ive ever seen, grats.
__________________________________
Your Dual 250mm Prototype I Gauss Gun perfectly strikes Estamel Tharchon, wrecking for 187.6 damage.
|
KIATolon
Black Omega Security
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:51:00 -
[7]
Confirmed.
RA logon trap.
We went into siege, they logged 15-20 cap ship pilots on immediately, cyno'd in, dropped bookmark bombs, killed 10 dreads and lost 2.
GF.
|
Bulletproof Cupid
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:52:00 -
[8]
I noticed the mass login from many jumps away (multiple RA in address book) minutes later the news broke.
congrats RA, or not congrats, depends on your views of login traps really
BP
|
Darcuese
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:53:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Darcuese on 23/07/2006 00:57:49
 Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
11 as i heard. Did your alt took a role in that fight?
Ah, you are not connected with RA...sry .
Still, fast creating of this thread 
DEAD or ALIVE we allways have some fun. DO YOU??
|
Therem Harth
DAB
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:55:00 -
[10]
Coming up next sizable anti-RA coalition loss: "RA logged on. It was a trap. Petitioned, hoping GMs forbid all RA players to log on at all."
To RA et al: nicely done, and yarr :)
--
|
Nebuli
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:56:00 -
[11]
Funny how only RED and RAT refer to RED as a dead alliance.
Log on trpas are lame, but I guess props for the kills, but kinda a hollow victory, and not like its going to change anything for RED.
CEO - Art of War |
Johnny Johnny
Evolution
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 00:58:00 -
[12]
Originally by: KIATolon
Confirmed.
RA logon trap.
We went into siege, they logged 15-20 cap ship pilots on immediately, cyno'd in, dropped bookmark bombs, killed 10 dreads and lost 2.
GF.
What's a bookmark bomb?
|
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:00:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Darcuese
Edited by: Darcuese on 23/07/2006 00:54:00
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
11 as i heard. Did your alt took a role in that fight?
Ah, you are not connected with RA...sry.
Still, fast creating of this thread
No, i didn`t took role in that fight. I just carebearing, when my friend send me a link to eve-online.ru forums, with this message.
Why i posted it ? Because i want to have a laugh, like coalition guys did 8th march.
Beleiving in your own propaganda = 4tl
Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE. |
Deja Thoris
Contraband Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:00:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Deja Thoris on 23/07/2006 01:01:53
meh, edited,
if it was metagaming then ftl
|
Crystallys Spyre
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:00:00 -
[15]
Ouch. The fact they had to be cynoed in, well, not a total oldschool log on trap.
"Lickity lick a lolipop, one taste of sweets and I just can't stop" |
Chode Rizoum
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:00:00 -
[16]
its not really a login trap ?
they logged on.. and then put op a cyno and then jumped to you ?
|
Polkovnik
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:02:00 -
[17]
New rules for fleet-fights in EVE!!!
Only 10000 isks for copy!
Here you have first 3 to try:
1. If enemy is in siege mode in system - no cynos at all! Never!
2. You have to be ALWAYS logged in when somebody is attacking your POS/Station.
3. You have to announce that you will/will not defend your POS/Station at least 1 day before somebody want to attack it.
...to be continued!
Any brake of theese rules is exploit/bug/hack.
GJ RED. Want more to come!
|
Kariss
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:02:00 -
[18]
So.. they logged in in a completely different system and then jumped to you? GL getting your ships back.. I petitioned once to a conventional log-in trap where myself and a friend jumped into a system following 2 hostiles, we had a scout in that system who verified no-one had come into the other gate and yet as soon as we jumped in, 7 more battleships appeared.
The first response to the petition was "yes, that's an exploit, send me the names" the next was "my colleague was incorrect, this is not an exploit, I'm sorry but there is nothing we can do" and this was backed up by a third, confirming it's not an exploit.
So.. that was people logging in and killing us in the same system and wasn't regarded as an exploit... I'll be very surprised if you get anything back from the GMs.
|
Captain Tinrib
Millennium
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:03:00 -
[19]
Despite the appauling logon trap, it was great fun to fight in a capital shootout like that, even if we were totally out gunned.
Watching over 20 wormholes open up around you and a large number of big red squares pop out of them is not good for the digestion
Still, at least we took a couple with us!
Kills |
The Enslaver
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:03:00 -
[20]
It was a logon trap, regardless of how you look at it - and it was pathetic of RA. Down even further in respect.
And no, no beaten record - RA lost 11 at once also, remember. That fight was most annoying as I was watching The Apprentice at the time, and therefore missed it. Damn I was ****ed off.
--------
|
Pepperami
Art of War
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:05:00 -
[21]
Well, logon or cyno it wouldn't make a huge difference surely?
RA is picking their fights and commiting capital ships (even if it is gank). Credit where it's due, well done RA. It's coalition task to wisen up now you're actually brining it with new all-capital battles 
[Art of War][- V -] |
Adam C
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:06:00 -
[22]
did u fraps it?
|
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:06:00 -
[23]
Edited by: Evil Thug on 23/07/2006 01:06:57
Originally by: The Enslaver
It was a logon trap, regardless of how you look at it - and it was pathetic of RA. Down even further in respect.
And no, no beaten record - RA lost 11 at once also, remember. That fight was most annoying as I was watching The Apprentice at the time, and therefore missed it. Damn I was ****ed off.
9. They lost 9. Killed 10. Sry.
Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE. |
Tethis
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:08:00 -
[24]
As far as i am aware, a login trap is not an exploit.
nice display of capital ship power RA and by eck, them POS guns hurt BS's alot
|
Aramark
Total Warehouse Logistics
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:10:00 -
[25]
good job RA.
Aasia: Are you implying you are mean by nature and it requires conscious choice on your part to fight your nature and be nice? Aramark: yes |
Pepperami
Art of War
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:12:00 -
[26]
btw, the Volcane killmail is incorrect; wrong time on it
He was killed tho - it's on era killboard. time was 0:00 so might be a killboard bug.
[Art of War][- V -] |
Sionn Klorgh
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:12:00 -
[27]
EVE is heading for a world of pain for CCP on this issue.
I'm wondering, are login trap legal? Based upon the general inaction by CCP on the issue, my guess is yes.
I'd love to hear from a GM a simple yes or no. If it is a yes, once other alliances get in on the act, CCP might consider hiring another 100 staff for its already overburdened petition system.
|
Stamm
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:13:00 -
[28]
Call me a liar, but I'm pretty sure I saw an ERA friendly post today stating that it wasn't about fair or enjoyable fights, it was about winning.
So when ERA lose a stack of cap ships to RA, all of a sudden the shoe is on the other foot?
We all play Eve by the mechanics of the game, someone that can win by playing within the mechanics is a winner. Someone that loses as a result is a loser.
It is that simple.
|
The Enslaver
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:15:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Evil Thug
Edited by: Evil Thug on 23/07/2006 01:06:57
Originally by: The Enslaver
It was a logon trap, regardless of how you look at it - and it was pathetic of RA. Down even further in respect.
And no, no beaten record - RA lost 11 at once also, remember. That fight was most annoying as I was watching The Apprentice at the time, and therefore missed it. Damn I was ****ed off.
9. They lost 9. Killed 10. Sry.
Do your research... 9, with another 2 about what, 10 minutes later? Suppose it was a 'seperate' engagement, but so close it may aswell be the same...
--------
|
Dillon Arklight
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:16:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Dillon Arklight on 23/07/2006 01:16:39
The only record beaten is the 3 simultaneous new topics created to boast about what you have just done.
|
goazer
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:19:00 -
[31]
i think its funny you say its a login trap maybe alot of them logged on to help defend but they were outside system, and used a Cyno-field if they had been logged in you would have gotten exactly the same notice as you did.
Seems like you are trying to make an excuse for such a devastating loss.
Unless your saying you wouldnt have attacked the pos if those pilots in your address where logged on. which is the same tactic in reverse kind of."Lets wait till all there capitol ship pilots log off before we attack.". Maybe more of an accepted practice but still the same thing.
|
DARTHMAUL sith
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:20:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
If you were trying to point out that RA is capable of taking out dreads with 2:1 odds in their favour congratulations point proven, any "dead" alliance can do that
|
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:22:00 -
[33]
Originally by: DARTHMAUL sith
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
If you were trying to point out that RA is capable of taking out dreads with 2:1 odds in their favour congratulations point proven, any "dead" alliance can do that
I`m trying to have a laugh, actually
Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE. |
Soraya Silvermoon
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:23:00 -
[34]
I belive evil thug is right with the numbers he present.. I`ve only up to date seen 9 killmails from the RA big loss...
Anyway.. login in in a different system is per definition not a logintrap that CCP declared and exploit a long time ago..
THis is why siege mode last 10 mins.. so that the enemy will have a chanse to attack you when you have dreads working..
The noobs are the one not providing sufficient support to fend of an attack if it comes.
Both coalition and RA have learnt that in the past. I`m a bit amused that era had to do the same mistake and allso in a system where its not at all important to kill towers as the sovereignity adn majority controll of moons are in friendly hands.
Rumours tell me that ERA were specifically told to not bother up there. Sorry guys you ****** up. and I got to say that you should take your loss as men and quit complaining to logintraps.
You ****** up, simple as that.
I`m no supporter of RA but this is still quite amusing :D
|
Dak Torin
Mithril Inc
Antigo Dominion
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:23:00 -
[35]
Gratz RED.
|
Nafri
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:23:00 -
[36]
its actually impossible to call a cynnoed capital fleet to call a "log in" trap.
From Dusk till Dawn
Sig removed, e-mail us if you'd like to know why. -ReverendM ([email protected]) |
Star Hunter
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:28:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Johnny Johnny
Originally by: KIATolon
Confirmed.
RA logon trap.
We went into siege, they logged 15-20 cap ship pilots on immediately, cyno'd in, dropped bookmark bombs, killed 10 dreads and lost 2.
GF.
What's a bookmark bomb?
It is what coalition likes to use as their tactics. I dont know much. ask them.
|
Captain Tinrib
Millennium
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:30:00 -
[38]
Yeah it wasnt a logon trap, RA just happened to have 22 capitals logged off fully fueled and armed all within jumprange of eastern cache. Whom all mysteriously logged on seconds after the ERA dreads assaulted thier P7- Pos and jumped in within 2 minutes in the middle of the night.
It wasnt a logon trap
Kills |
Darcuese
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:31:00 -
[39]
Edited by: Darcuese on 23/07/2006 01:32:19
Originally by: Star Hunter
Originally by: Johnny Johnny
What's a bookmark bomb?
It is what coalition likes to use as their tactics. I dont know much. ask them.
DEAD or ALIVE we allways have some fun. DO YOU??
|
HostageTaker
Black Nova Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:33:00 -
[40]
Frapsed?!
Yes or No?
>>> EvE Online Wallpapers <<< |
KIATolon
Black Omega Security
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:33:00 -
[41]
Edited by: KIATolon on 23/07/2006 01:33:45
20 cap ship pilots logging on in simultaneously to trap someone that doesn't have the ability to react is a logon trap. I never said it was illegal, I just said it occurred.
If their cap ships pilots had been online we wouldn't have engaged their POS.
A bookmark bomb is a can full of bookmarks, such as we blew up from your other POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
|
Kyguard
LFC
3rd Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:35:00 -
[42]
Killed 11 and lost 2 and you had a ****load of carriers and had to use a login trap? Makes you wonder what would have happened if you didn't..
===
God is on the side with the best arti |
Captain Tinrib
Millennium
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:39:00 -
[43]
Edited by: Captain Tinrib on 23/07/2006 01:40:07
Originally by: Kyguard
Killed 11 and lost 2 and you had a ****load of carriers and had to use a login trap? Makes you wonder what would have happened if you didn't..
They lost 3 dreads (moros, rev, naglfar) and someone mentioned a carrier altho i havent seen a killmail for that so unconfirmed.
They had 12 dread and ~ 8-10 carriers vs our 11 dreads
Kills |
nync
Russian SOBR
Red Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:40:00 -
[44]
Originally by: goazer
i think its funny you say its a login trap maybe alot of them logged on to help defend but they were outside system, and used a Cyno-field if they had been logged in you would have gotten exactly the same notice as you did.
Seems like you are trying to make an excuse for such a devastating loss.
Unless your saying you wouldnt have attacked the pos if those pilots in your address where logged on. which is the same tactic in reverse kind of."Lets wait till all there capitol ship pilots log off before we attack.". Maybe more of an accepted practice but still the same thing.
Absolutely correct. We were moving 22 capital ships for 2-3 hours before fight. Cynofileds could be clearly seen all round Cache region for hours. And before attacking a well armed POS it's a good idea to check cyno fields around.
|
Angelus X
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:43:00 -
[45]
o.0 So many cap ships killed, so much isk lost, so much anger, so much hate. 
Eve, luv it. 
-----
|
Star Hunter
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:43:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Darcuese
Edited by: Darcuese on 23/07/2006 01:32:19
Originally by: Star Hunter
Originally by: Johnny Johnny
What's a bookmark bomb?
It is what coalition likes to use as their tactics. I dont know much. ask them.
Does this mean u agree with me or what. I only know I lagged alot before. even when it was only one eny frig out of the gate. when i killed him its cargo was filled with BMs. thats all I know really.
|
Acwron
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:46:00 -
[47]
Originally by: KIATolon
[...]
A bookmark bomb is a can full of bookmarks, such as we blew up from your other POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
Comforting to see that losing your dread didn't change you one bit. Still making things up and throwing mud around.
/Acwron kuddles Tolon. Everything will be allright my dear.
|
goazer
Amarr
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:47:00 -
[48]
Originally by: KIATolon
Edited by: KIATolon on 23/07/2006 01:33:45
20 cap ship pilots logging on in simultaneously to trap someone that doesn't have the ability to react is a logon trap. I never said it was illegal, I just said it occurred.
If their cap ships pilots had been online we wouldn't have engaged their POS.
A bookmark bomb is a can full of bookmarks, such as we blew up from your other POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
I know im not as experienced as you all in the art of pos takedowns seeing as i have only kiled like 10 but it would seem to me you shouldnt put in 10 dreads that you cant defend and then complain about it.
|
Turkantho
Asgard Schiffswerften
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:49:00 -
[49]
Edited by: Turkantho on 23/07/2006 01:50:39
Originally by: KIATolon
A bookmark bomb is a can full of bookmarks, such as we blew up from your other POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
Nice flamebait, got any proof at all for that accusation ? If not just shut up.
________
Asgar[D]¦ |
Cringeley
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:49:00 -
[50]
Crappy luck, ERA. Chins up, I know you'll prevail. It's not as though you were beaten in an even fight, they just got a chance to blob you.
--------------------------------------------
Thrice is he armed who has his quarrel just,
But four times he who gets his blow in fust. |
Star Hunter
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:50:00 -
[51]
Originally by: KIATolon
Edited by: KIATolon on 23/07/2006 01:33:45
.
If their cap ships pilots had been online we wouldn't have engaged their POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
By this words u confirm using game mechanics (cheking online status) by your self.
So if you use this mechanics to guard your self from atack, why cant we log (in other system) to use some mechanics to pass this guard.
|
Vibius
GoonWaffe
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:53:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Star Hunter
Originally by: KIATolon
Edited by: KIATolon on 23/07/2006 01:33:45
.
If their cap ships pilots had been online we wouldn't have engaged their POS.
A trick I think they learnt from G.
By this words u confirm using game mechanics (cheking online status) by your self.
So if you use this mechanics to guard your self from atack, why cant we log (in other system) to use some mechanics to pass this guard.
Why are you asking this question if Tolon never said you couldn't do it?
|
KIATolon
Black Omega Security
E.R.A
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 01:57:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Star Hunter
By this words u confirm using game mechanics (cheking online status) by your self.
So if you use this mechanics to guard your self from atack, why cant we log (in other system) to use some mechanics to pass this guard.
When did I ever say you couldn't?
|
Moominer
Independent Frontiers
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:01:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Moominer on 23/07/2006 02:04:25
If CCP were to outlaw this kind of operation, what would a "legitimate" version have looked like? Some random musings:
- RA cap fleet would have had to be ingame, obviously.
- If the RA cap fleet was ingame (and not docked or in a pos) you could have located them and gone for them, rather than the station/POS?
- If the RA cap fleet was ingame, would coalition even have attacked the objective knowing the threat?
- Risk ending up with a situation where people only attack when you are 100% certain your enemy is offline. Is that any fairer than the current situation? "Timezone warfare" whine will follow :S
- None of this is really enforceable by CCP
BoBs answer to this is never move your cap fleet without appropriate support. That's the obvious solution here.
Harsh loss, definatly difficult to take considering the "unsporting" situation it was taken under. Cant wait to watch the vid though.
Eve Fitting Manager
|
Amerame
Section XIII
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:02:00 -
[55]
Well congratulations RA for winning this fight, the result is most impressive, I can't wait to see the fraps of this most unusual fight.
|
Star Hunter
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:04:00 -
[56]
Originally by: KIATolon
Originally by: Star Hunter
By this words u confirm using game mechanics (cheking online status) by your self.
So if you use this mechanics to guard your self from atack, why cant we log (in other system) to use some mechanics to pass this guard.
When did I ever say you couldn't?
u did not.
just stop complaining on login trap. we did not log on your head.
and as I said before, if both of our sides did not used game mechanics u even would not know wether we are loged in or not.
so just take it as it is.
|
Marovinchian
Contraband Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:04:00 -
[57]
hmm, login trap or whatever aside...i always give respect too people who defend themselves. One thing set aside....getting those kind of cap ship numbers at what sounds like oddball time of day is impressive by any measure.
Shame RA didn't put as much participation into the tournament....might've gained some respect
|
Vibius
GoonWaffe
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:07:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Star Hunter
u did not.
just stop complaining on login trap. we did not log on your head.
and as I said before, if both of our sides did not used game mechanics u even would not know wether we are loged in or not.
so just take it as it is.
You're going to have to quote Tolon's exact words and explain how they are a complaint, because from what I can see he is not complaining.
|
Kuang
V I R I I
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:28:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Captain Tinrib
Yeah it wasnt a logon trap, RA just happened to have 22 capitals logged off fully fueled and armed all within jumprange of eastern cache. Whom all mysteriously logged on seconds after the ERA dreads assaulted thier P7- Pos and jumped in within 2 minutes in the middle of the night.
It wasnt a logon trap
Correct it's called a trap ... they knew where you were going to be and hit and waited for you to take the bait ... RA did a great job on tactics on this one
Have great respect for BOS and Mill and feel for the loss . Congrats on taking 3 down under such odds
CDC Forums
|
Lorth
Synchro.
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:29:00 -
[60]
Perhaps if we a lucky, CCP will see to change Log on traps in much the same way they did when RED was abusing, carriers, or POS's.
-------------
Recruit me |
Altai Saker
Omniscient Order
Verisum Family
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:34:00 -
[61]
Lol, RA boasting about a logon trap... Not much more I would expect from them tbh.
|
Don ZOLA
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:44:00 -
[62]
imho only "bookmarks bomb" is exploit here. props for well organized trap.
There are 2 rules in a successful life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know
|
Nebba Kenezzer
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:45:00 -
[63]
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
Wow, that's almost as good as when your Mothership & POS got blown to bits.
Nebba - The Vocal Majority
|
Poolpy
dev zero
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:47:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Altai Saker
Lol, RA boasting about a logon trap... Not much more I would expect from them tbh.
Logon trap == logon in the same system, eventually near the target.
They loged in other sys and cynoed in, quite different, no ?
|
Evil Thug
Rage and Terror
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:51:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Nebba Kenezzer
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
Wow, that's almost as good as when your Mothership & POS got blown to bits.
Rage and Terror - making people quit EVE. |
Nebba Kenezzer
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:52:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Evil Thug
Originally by: Nebba Kenezzer
Originally by: Evil Thug
Subject.
ERA just lost 10 drednoughts to "dead" alliance.
Congratulations
Wow, that's almost as good as when your Mothership & POS got blown to bits.
I just wanted to see how fast you would reply.
BTW, the owl is a bit passe.
Nebba - The Vocal Majority
|
HHschmid
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 02:55:00 -
[67]
perhaps it was a trap but on the other hand a good cap fleet is fitted and fueled to engage if they are needed. many of the capital pilots are loged off or use other accounts/alts if they are not needed. there is no point to have them online if you dont need them.
|
Nebba Kenezzer
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 03:06:00 -
[68]
Originally by: HHschmid
perhaps it was a trap but on the other hand a good cap fleet is fitted and fueled to engage if they are needed. many of the capital pilots are loged off or use other accounts/alts if they are not needed. there is no point to have them online if you dont need them.
Indeed, but you'll find after many capital ship operations, that having 20 capital ship pilots log on within seconds of each other is quite a rarity.
The level of coordination involved with something such as that indicates it was a trap.
The tactic may or may not be fair, that's not for me to decide. I do think it's comparable to logging off whilst (or just before) being engaged. No less than an act of cowardice. But when RA is involved, how much more can you expect?
Nebba - The Vocal Majority
|
|
Abdalion
|
Posted - 2006.07.23 03:17:00 -
[69]
Troll post.
___
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |