| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

wierchas noobhunter
Caldari
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:01:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Exiled One Who? another caldari/minmatar spec pilot that doesnt want to waste skillpoints down in the gallente ships/railgun tree? Or am I wrong?
a: Youre wrong. b: Are you on drugs?
b: i think mushrooms
join col ! now |

Laocoon
Veto.
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:13:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Exiled One Moa > Rokh Celestis > gallente tier 3 arbitrator > amarr tier 3
Moa > Rokh Thorax > Hyperion *OMG NOTHING! ORIGINAILTY! HIDE!* > Abaddon
ffs what's the problem? We ask for a blaster boat; we get one  - Lao
Veto. Corp |

Zacheria Malfor
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:19:00 -
[33]
To the OP, may the fires of hell consume you quickly.
Missiles on Gallente ships as a primary weapons system? Hell No!
Gallente rely on Hybrids and Drones, it's bad enough the Lachesis has a missile bonus.
Do not fear the reaper, for death is the only certainty in life. |

Laboratus
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.27 15:21:00 -
[34]
I fully support an EW gallantean battleship. And getting a 10% Thermal bonus for cruise/torps would be neat. Mind control and tin hats |

Taurgil
Balanced Unity
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 15:14:00 -
[35]
I do not support the idea of a ewar gallente tier3 ship as we don't know how the EW is "fixed".
I do, however, support the idea of a Celestis based Tier 3 BS *IF* it has a bonus on BOTH weapon systems, if it has a mixed hislot layout.
|

Laboratus
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 15:50:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Taurgil I do not support the idea of a ewar gallente tier3 ship as we don't know how the EW is "fixed".
I do, however, support the idea of a Celestis based Tier 3 BS *IF* it has a bonus on BOTH weapon systems, if it has a mixed hislot layout.
So 7.5% cruis/siege ROF and 7.5% hybrid damage +10 Sensor damp boni?
Excelent. A gallantean Typhoon. If only it had a small sig radius. Mind control and tin hats |

Cohkka
LoneWolf Mining R i s e
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 16:27:00 -
[37]
Originally by: wierchas noobhunter die
/signed. Don't speak english, just F5, F5, F5... |

Merv Tring
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:21:00 -
[38]
What's wrong with an 8/6/6 BS with 8 Turrets and 2 Missile bays, 10% Sensor Damp efficieny, and a tracking bonus? Wouldn't that make a pretty decent blaster boat? Cut their range down to size, then MWD towards them and start blasting away. Mids allow for tackling/cap booster/2 damps, lows allow for a good armor tank.
I know, it's not a DPS monster. But blasters have very nice DPS already, don't they?
|

Kaeten
Hybrid Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:24:00 -
[39]
NO ******* WAY, if teir 3 becomes a missle damp boat im quitting eve serisly.
High-Sec Piracy Recruitment |

Krulla
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:24:00 -
[40]
Speaking as someone who is specialized in gallente, has Gallente BS 5, large blaster and railgun spec 4, and 4 million SP in drones..
NO.
25% damage 25% mwd penality reduction is my dream ship. Replace it with a dampening raven wannabe and... 
|

Kaeten
Hybrid Syndicate
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:26:00 -
[41]
Originally by: wierchas noobhunter die
I'm on ther verge of war decing the guys corp lol 
High-Sec Piracy Recruitment |

Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:42:00 -
[42]
Originally by: murder one
Originally by: FFGR A 5 bonus missile boat BS with 15.5k grid and 700 CPU ?
that would be a nice "I Win" button 
No, not a 5 bonus ship. The 2nd bonus is 10% improvement to all attributes of Sensor damps, similar to a Domi's 10% bonus to drone damage/hitpoints per level. Single bonus affecting more than one aspect of the same thing it's giving the bonus to.
Tat's 5 bonuses.
Do you see ships getting 5% dmg, range, falloff, rof bonus on guns?
No, you don't.
|

Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:44:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Darpz Edited by: Darpz on 27/07/2006 13:13:33 Edited by: Darpz on 27/07/2006 13:08:21 make the domi a EW boat instead of a Drone boat
make the Slot Layout 6/6/6 changer the bonus to 5% Damp Effectiveness and 10% damp falloff leave it with a 200m3 drone bay bay so it would still make a great solo ship just with less dps and make the hyperion the drone boat
slot layout 6/4/8
Bonus first bonus would be same as domi except it effects logitics and ew drones also second bonus would be 7.5% rep amount per level. dronebay equal to the current domi enough grid for with max skills 6 heavy nos and 1 Large rep (if the pilot wants an injector or a second rep it wll need a fitting mod) you do this and the caldari can have there uber sniper ship and I won't complain
That would go completely against this history of the game, not that the current titan/mothership setups don't, but the Domi is a drone boat, it'd be pretty dumb to just change it istead of making the NEw ship have the NEW role.
|

Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 17:47:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Exiled One
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
Originally by: Exiled One SHOULD BE SHOULD BE -- you have no idea about eve ships.
Says the guy who wants to give the Gallente a ****ty missile ship.
1. Never said anything about any missile ships 2. You wasted 1.5 months training for you blasters II 3. You probably wasted 2 weeks maxing out mwd related skills. 4. DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT A CELESTIS IS?
BOO ******* HOO i wasted 3 months training don't make me train some more. WELCOME.
1. Both you and the OP want to turn the Hyperion into a half arsed Ewar ship, he wants missiles you want turrets, in the end itll still be the primary and boring to fly. 2. Training all the Blaster spec skills took a lot longer then 1.5 months, i however do not consider them wasted since all i fly is Gallente blaster ships anyway. 3. Al moast all of them maxed out, which took me a lot longer then 2 weeks. 4. Want to fly a bigger celestis? Get an Arazu like the rest of us and leave the Hyperion to become the ultimate Blaster Battleship.
Note to self: Long range webber if Joshua is in local.
|

Malthros Zenobia
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve Kimotoro Directive
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 18:04:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Laboratus I fully support an EW gallantean battleship. And getting a 10% Thermal bonus for cruise/torps would be neat.
hahahaha
Oh you were serious about the 10% bonus for cruise/torps?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|

Plim
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 19:13:00 -
[46]
This thread makes me want nuclear holocaust. -----------------
Victory or death! ... knitting is also an option. |

Hllaxiu
Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 19:24:00 -
[47]
Originally by: murder one
6/8/6 slot layout. 6 Missile hardpoints. 700 CPU, 15500 Grid. ... Now how's *that* for an awesome BS?
So... Gallente cross train Caldari for the ultimate railgun sniper battleship, and the Caldari cross train Gallente for the ultimate missile boat!  --- Our greatest glory is not in never failing, but in rising up every time we fail. - Emerson |

Luc Boye
Evolution Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 20:53:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Hllaxiu
Originally by: murder one
6/8/6 slot layout. 6 Missile hardpoints. 700 CPU, 15500 Grid. ... Now how's *that* for an awesome BS?
So... Gallente cross train Caldari for the ultimate railgun sniper battleship, and the Caldari cross train Gallente for the ultimate missile boat! 
t2 gallents battleships should fit pulse lasers tbh
-------------------------- MWD Cap Penalty? |

Arkanor
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 21:01:00 -
[49]
Originally by: murder one Lets just imagine for a moment an extension of the Celestis concept to a BS level ship: Now how's *that* for an awesome BS?
It's not, I'll take a Scorpion please.
Originally by: Ghosthowl WoW = hardcore paladins smashin dat face.
Originally by: HippoKing I just cried, you know that?
|

FawKa
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.29 22:54:00 -
[50]
Edited by: FawKa on 29/07/2006 22:54:43 Edited by: FawKa on 29/07/2006 22:53:59
Originally by: wierchas noobhunter die
allmost good enough
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain DIE
accepted
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=369662&page=1#10 Link to banner |

Espen
Shinra Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 01:04:00 -
[51]
Edited by: Espen on 30/07/2006 01:11:13
Originally by: Exiled One Moa > Rokh Celestis > gallente tier 3 arbitrator > amarr tier 3
DEVS WAKE THE F. UP.
DON'T BE STUPID. THAT WOULD MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL, EPSILON 1!
|

McTaggart
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 03:51:00 -
[52]
A bigger Celestis is not a missile boat. With more turrets than launchers, a bonus to tracking and being a Gallente ship, it's a hybrid turret/ewar ship.
The OP's ships is a Caldari win button masquerading as a Gallente boat.
|

locus 777
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 04:01:00 -
[53]
Lovely bunch of people you are
I was personally disappointed that all the creative imagination of CCP could come up with is a blaster boat. I'd hoped the last changes to the Mega would have made such a need redundant. (Maybe it did)
While its obvious the original posters desire for a missile ship would be howled down by the knuckle draggers, doesn't give many of you the right to be such ********s. There are a number of different ship manufacturers the Gallente have, and cross platform ships, are what they produce, albeit with limited missile loadings. I personally would have liked am 'ew'/drone bs, and for argument sake its r/s/damp bonus could have been conducive to a certain amount of missile hardpoints. (yes, yes, i know gallente have the domi) A lot could have been made of speed bonus to drones, EW bonus if using EW drones, sentry drones etc.
Many races have had to train cross platform, no reason the gallente shouldn't either. And go easy on this guy, at least offer options, don't just sit there repeating the mantra, "blasters, blasters, blasters" cos thats all you have trained. (i know this is not all of you)
|

anotleam
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 05:43:00 -
[54]
Yep, a dampening boat could've been fun. Still, megathron has never felt like "true" blasterboat, it's not specially faster, or has an specially strong armor to allow him to get close and survive, and have a standard cap, which sucks specially cause you need a mwd (not to mention that blasters need a tweak, even the devs said so but it seems that they've forgot). Hopefuly, Hyperion will finaly cover the blasterboat role.
Instead of all this rants bout a dampening bs, i would be asking for changing the dominix turret dmg for a dampening range bonus, so we'd have a dampening bs, a railboat, and a blasterboat ^^.
|

Sakura Nihil
Tharsis Security
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 09:10:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Plim This thread makes me want nuclear holocaust.
Quote of the Day.
|

Riho
Mercenary Forces
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 09:48:00 -
[56]
ty, ill keep the current Hyperion bonis and stuff that has been proposed :)
want missiles and stuff... go specc caldari
|

Heartbreak Harriet
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 12:19:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Heartbreak Harriet on 30/07/2006 12:21:11 The idea of a big Celestis is kind of interesting, but I can get why everyone here is hating on the OP. A Gallente BS based off of the Celestis wouldn't look a hell of a lot like his design. I think it would probably be more like this:
7/7/5 (5 Turret/3 Launcher) 650 CPU, 11000 Powergrid 650m3 Cargo 100m3 Drone Bay 6420 Structure 5679 Shield, 2000 second recharge 5313 Armor 5000 Capacitor, 1000 second recharge 80km Max targeting range, 8 targets 80 Scan Resolution, 23 sensor strength 430 Signature Radius, 135m/sec Velocity 110000000 Mass
5% Damage to Large Hybrid Turrets, 5% (or maybe 10%) bonus to sensor damper effectiveness
Certain aspects of this design are, obviously, not perfectly in line with the Celestis exactly because of issues in relation to other battleships. It's not exactly the same, but it actually follows the design philosophy. Like the Celestis, it is a turret ship with some optional missile hardpoints for versatility. It's okay at EW. It has more dronebay than most non-Gallente ships, but less than it's brothers. It's faster than the Shoe and the Tuning Fork, but also the heaviest. It's ship bonus is also not insane.
That said, I don't know if a ship like this one would be any better than the current, blaster-focused design of the Hyperion. In fact, I think it makes more sense for it to be a blaster ship, so long as it's not faster than the Tempest and Typhoon. But, unlike the OP's design, it's not an unbalanced mess, and has stats that actually make sense. A missile-based Gallente ship is, I'm sorry, a pretty dumb idea. If anything, Minmatar would be the next race to get a missile-based BS.
Regardless of what happens, I get the feeling the tier 3s are going to cause more problems than they solve.
|

Zanarkand
Gallente
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 12:33:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Kaeten NO ******* WAY, if teir 3 becomes a missle damp boat im quitting eve serisly.
ehm, why?
Tier3 for sensordamping BS!!!
|

DeadRow
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 13:01:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain DIE
Basically said whats needed to be said in this thread 
CCP nerfed my sig: Maxell Snow > holy crap i just realized the only t2 component i have used is a t2 mining laser here |

Mudkest
|
Posted - 2006.07.30 14:07:00 -
[60]
Originally by: murder one
Originally by: FFGR A 5 bonus missile boat BS with 15.5k grid and 700 CPU ?
that would be a nice "I Win" button 
No, not a 5 bonus ship. The 2nd bonus is 10% improvement to all attributes of Sensor damps, similar to a Domi's 10% bonus to drone damage/hitpoints per level. Single bonus affecting more than one aspect of the same thing it's giving the bonus to.
nope, the 10% bonus to drone hitpoints/damage comes from drone upgrade, it used to have the single +1 drone per level bonus. Now it can use half the drones but drones do double damage and have double hitpoints, so effectivly same amount of drones as before. If domi had similar bonus then it would have had +10% to drone damage/hitpoints/tracking/speed
- It is much more efficient to talk to yourself in person than via the chat system.
Now imagine the unimaginable |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |