| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Petition - ban capitals carrying pos components and fuel - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: slothe Life sucks, get a ******* helmet A carrier is a logistics ship. Next time you rant over it being able to carry ships to the front in 0.0 too so you cant gategank them wtf Carriers are designed for these oper...
- by anotleam - at 2006.08.23 22:18:00
|
2. EVE FOR PS3 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: KirikaPhoenix Originally by: *****a Mi You guys that say PS3 sucks; It isnt even released yet. So how can you say it sucks. Do you know that the PS3 will be more powerfull then a PC. I remember a post about this Gu...
- by anotleam - at 2006.08.12 01:09:00
|
3. DPS Doesnt Seem to Change Much from Class S to Class M Weapons ... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 08/08/2006 14:06:26
- by anotleam - at 2006.08.08 14:06:00
|
4. Hyperion and Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 20:54:42 EDIT: sigh, this is leam lol Originally by: Deathbarrage Edited by: Deathbarrage on 31/07/2006 09:51:55 Originally by: Leam Originally by: Levin Cavil Anyone that says Ga...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 20:54:00
|
5. Top Ten Reasons why EVE is better than WoW! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Novarei Originally by: PeeWee Pee CCP > BLIZZARD Tell me the part where CCP have millions of subscribers and blizzard dont. Tell me the part where blizzard does a mmorpg with a player politics (other than rp...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 07:23:00
|
6. Hyperion (new?) Cap Bonus - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 05:26:57 Originally by: BlackLotus Eater Sorry I wasn't that clear . . . Current System T2 Heavy Cap Booster Capacity = 200m3 Proposal Bonus (an arbitrary number) = 100% Cap Booster Capicity Per Lev...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 05:27:00
|
7. Hyperion and Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 05:23:58
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 05:24:00
|
8. Thorax, Hyperion, and Microwarpdrives. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
No matter what will do, some ppl will always complain. Not so long ago, there was posts in the forum asking to give it a mwd bonus lol. I agree with you, mwd bonus is much better than many ppl think, only one thing, I *think* a thorax with 1000 c...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 02:02:00
|
9. Hyperion and Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 31/07/2006 01:55:00
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.31 01:55:00
|
10. Hyperion and Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Porro Originally by: Leam maths stuff You forgot drone interfacing, with drone spec 4 its 311dps. It still makes the gap between the thron and the hype smaller. Oh right thanks, i've been wondering why the re...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.30 14:31:00
|
11. Hyperion and Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 30/07/2006 09:05:21 Originally by: Levin Cavil I think we can agree that the bonus on the Hyperion needs changed, maybe we can even agree on the rep bonus. Originally by: Rod Blaine I'd assume that in t...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.30 09:04:00
|
12. Dev's Nos Nerf Bad Idea - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
1)The whole concept of "sucking" the energy from the other ship is stupid, so questions like "why dont they protect the whole cap" are out of place... answer would be cause the capactior yidda-yadda counter the nos effect as result of the yadda-ya...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.30 08:48:00
|
13. Bring Back dual MWD !! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
as much as i miss my 80km/sec megathron, i must say bad idea. So much speed was absurd :P
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.30 05:47:00
|
14. Hyperion concept: Missile/Damp BS - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Yep, a dampening boat could've been fun. Still, megathron has never felt like "true" blasterboat, it's not specially faster, or has an specially strong armor to allow him to get close and survive, and have a standard cap, which sucks specially cau...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.30 05:43:00
|
15. Rokh + Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kazaam Actually, if a Blasterokh meets any other short range BS, Rokh could win : With a faction webber you can throw it to 14km, and get fairly near optimal range with Neutron w/Null. At that distance, Rokh can keep up unw...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.29 05:33:00
|
16. Bloggers #20, Tuxford on Tier 3 Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: anotleam on 29/07/2006 05:24:06 Edited by: anotleam on 29/07/2006 05:21:58 Edited by: anotleam on 29/07/2006 05:21:02 Originally by: Zhou Sengokuan So you guys decided on the blasterboat that already exists(check st...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.29 05:17:00
|
17. Rokh + Blasters - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
and if the range gets too long they always can make the bonus rails only..
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.26 21:47:00
|
18. MWD cap penalty, why is it here? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Without a mwd cap penalty, most of bs would have one. Snipers would use em to stay at range and so on, without a much worse tank. mwd raven ftw, mwd gankaships ftw?. Yeah, it takes grid and cpu but it's not unfitable at all,and 500%+ to speed is a...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.26 15:40:00
|
19. MWD cap penalty, why is it here? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Originally by: anotleam Medium shield booster, 60 hp boosted, 3 seconds = 20 hp "repaired" per second Medium armor repairer, 240 hp repairer, 12 seconds = 20 hp repaired per second maths ftw Do th...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.26 13:39:00
|
20. MWD cap penalty, why is it here? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Jim McGregor Edited by: Jim McGregor on 26/07/2006 13:11:27 Originally by: Luc Boye The raven is the ship that has about perfect balance between tanking and dps, every other ship has to sacrifice one for the ot...
- by anotleam - at 2006.07.26 13:16:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |