| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Winthorp
2697
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 04:02:00 -
[31] - Quote
Shiloh Templeton wrote:Winthorp wrote:CCP Fozzie could do an amazing blog with all the WH data they have i am sure, but why would he want to with the level of hate that has been on these forums lately. Because if CCP had numbers that refuted the naysayers they'd release them in a heartbeat ... and the protests would come to an end (other than Dinsdale types of course) because the vast majority of players want Eve and CCP to succeed. If numbers are truly down then hopefully CCP will change course, or be right in their belief that the short term pain will be worth it in the long run.
Actually not the case at all, we have been whining for a long time that nobody mines in WH space in the numbers they used to and they could have refuted us at any point on that and CCP Fozzie only used it as a reference point in the WH Townhall.
I think they are quite happy ignoring idiots. |

Pavel Sohaj
Anoikis Exploration
48
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 05:57:00 -
[32] - Quote
Pro TIps wrote:I watched a corp haul their **** out of W-space this weekend. Sad, and their killboard wasn't bad -- lot better than mine. They were in a C4 of course. :(
Another one bites the dust. Much like we did. Funnily enough, new found space in C5 is like million times more quiet. |

Pavel Sohaj
Anoikis Exploration
48
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 06:00:00 -
[33] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Shiloh Templeton wrote:Winthorp wrote:CCP Fozzie could do an amazing blog with all the WH data they have i am sure, but why would he want to with the level of hate that has been on these forums lately. Because if CCP had numbers that refuted the naysayers they'd release them in a heartbeat ... and the protests would come to an end (other than Dinsdale types of course) because the vast majority of players want Eve and CCP to succeed. If numbers are truly down then hopefully CCP will change course, or be right in their belief that the short term pain will be worth it in the long run. Actually not the case at all, we have been whining for a long time that nobody mines in WH space in the numbers they used to and they could have refuted us at any point on that and CCP Fozzie only used it as a reference point in the WH Townhall. I think they are quite happy ignoring idiots.
And they must be quite happy to have such staunch defenders. Even if the numbers that would point absolutely to activity decline were true, you-¦d bash on that just to prove your non-existing point. Hyperion is a failure. Holes are beyond empty nowadays. No amount of wannabe PVP can fix that since people mostly have no interest in it. But you fail to see that, apparently.
|

Jack Miton
Isogen 5
3790
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 06:19:00 -
[34] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:corbexx wrote:Winthorp wrote:corbexx wrote:CCP Fozzie has some numbers. but thats obviously NDA It is only NDA at their whim. Its NDA cos its on the csm forum area. If it wasnt for the fact CCP Fozzie said he had got some data already I wouldn't even be able to say that much. Which really sucks. Hopefully I'll be able to say more soon, as I really dont like hiding stuff behind NDA. Yeah that's my point though, nobody expects a CSM to be able to release it without approval. Am only asking CCP Fozzie to do the blog he said he might be able to come up with when he spoke at townhall. i too would love to see a CCP blog regarding this but the reality is this is unlikely to happen if the numbers make them look bad which is pretty understandable tbh.
out of interest, what you you expect these numbers to show? Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/
Down the Pipe:-á http://downthepipe-wh.com/ |

Ahost Gceo
Rolled Out Triumvirate.
213
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 06:33:00 -
[35] - Quote
WH space was on the decline a year to two years before Hyperion. This is largely due to a lack of actual new content being put into that region of space. 80% of what CCP does are tweaks and balances and maybe 20% new content addition to the game. CCP needs to wake the hell up and actually add NEW **** to WH space if anybody is going to spend their time there, instead of just tweak numbers and formulas they already have and hope people like what is being regurgitated.
Weren't some fantastic suggestions made during the roundtable CCP wanted to have to gather player input? And instead we recieve a mere set of tweaks we railed against for weeks. This is poor development in its prime. I'm a friggin' banana. |

Winthorp
2697
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 07:04:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote: i too would love to see a CCP blog regarding this but the reality is this is unlikely to happen if the numbers make them look bad which is pretty understandable tbh.
out of interest, what you you expect these numbers to show?
So your in the "CCP won't show us stats we must be right club".... Check. Get yo pitchfork ready
Unlike others i don't want graphs to prove how much of a failure Hyperion was to force them to do a roll back. The data may indeed suggest that WH space has been in freefall since Hyperion and may show some of the changes were too drastic.
But in the end even if they show WH space has seen a decline in activity i would hope they wouldn't roll it back and instead buff low class site income to be the drawcard to bring people in like it should have been done with Hyperion.
We have asked for more Data on WH space since the Two Step days where there was the whole debate over low class WH's shouldn't be allowed large towers and we did indeed get some data from CCP. I would like to see more graphs and data from CCP about WH's not just about the whole Hyperion debate though, i just like shiny graphs TBH. |

Winthorp
2697
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 07:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Mister Tuggles wrote:
1 + 1 = 2
Pre-Hyperion cap kills vs post hyperion cap kills = numbers are down.
Don't know how you can spin the truth. Maybe make it a super truth? Better yet, spin it into cotton candy.
Sure lets take a months worth of Data and ignore years worth of the same cap kills and ignore every other subcap class ship and all the other WH class's that are not cap capable to roll. 
You need to math harder or i need to count like you.... 1+6-2x2=2? Right? |

Janeway84
Its a good day to die ORPHANS OF EVE
96
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 07:57:00 -
[38] - Quote
I think its a mix of things, CCP adding more duck tape instead of putting in new materials to the house.. Me personaly i got very excited about some of the changes and some i was less excited about, but in hindsight live still goes on. Some players rage quitting wh space to do something else.. and then some players where on the way out anyways due to inactive members etc. Balance changes are a good thing, but players expect more I think and some players probably cling on too stuff ccp hinted years ago that they would add to wh space.
To live in wh-space you got to have a little guerilla mentality to survive  |

Borsek
Incertae Sedis
248
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 08:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
I'm more concerned because activity should be going up, since it's the end of the summer holiday period for most countries - the schoolyear has begun, and usually EvE activity in general rises. To see how the changes affected the amount of caps killed, you'd have to check the value of capital ship losses, since most everyone rolling with a cap will be using a specialized setup to do so (nanocaps ftl). But, it's just two weeks of data, should wait for at least a month's worth before doing anything about it. As for frig WHs, a possible solution I see is lowering the chance of spawning to something like 2 to c6 space 10 to c5, 20 to c4, etc, as in more possible spawns with lower classes, with an emphasis on k-k space frig holes, like empire to 0.0 - that gives hisec channel fleets an option to roam in null and wormholers more of a chance to kill and be killed in our favorite cruiser sized ships. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't really see a frig swarm killing caps with sleepers on field as a possibility for anyone but the largest corps/alliances (even then, it's more likely the locals wouldn't be running with a frig hole in system). |

Terrorfrodo
Renegade Hobbits for Mordor
654
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 09:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
I don't really care about cap kills. Sure, it's great to kill caps, but they are not what wspace is or should be about. If it turns out that cap kills are really down because people close less and are less willing to commit to cap fights, that doesn't mean that the changes were bad. As long as the skirmish part of wspace pvp is revived GÇô although I don't expect that has happened either, at least not yet.
About frig wormholes... at first they were everywhere, but since the last little patch that lowered their spawn rate, I have seen only two or three total. Doesn't seem like an issue to me anymore. . |

Marox Calendale
Human League
28
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 09:18:00 -
[41] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:You need to math harder or i need to count like you.... 1+6-2x2=2? Right? No correct answer is 3 
|

calaretu
Honestly We didnt know Unsettled.
192
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 09:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Marox Calendale wrote:Winthorp wrote:You need to math harder or i need to count like you.... 1+6-2x2=2? Right? No correct answer is 3 
Depends.
(1+6-2)x2=10 1+6-(2x2)=3 1+((6-2)x2)=9
A side note can also be that x denote a unknown and not multiplication.
1+6-2*x*2=2 If so then: x=4/5 ~Bringer of happiness
http://collapsedbehind.blogspot.no/ |

Marox Calendale
Human League
28
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 11:30:00 -
[43] - Quote
calaretu wrote:Marox Calendale wrote:Winthorp wrote:You need to math harder or i need to count like you.... 1+6-2x2=2? Right? No correct answer is 3  Depends. (1+6-2)x2=10 1+6-(2x2)=3 1+((6-2)x2)=9 If this was his Intention he shouldn-¦t forget the brackets 
Quote:A side note can also be that x denote a unknown and not multiplication.
1+6-2*x*2=2 If so then: x=4/5 You-¦re probably better in math's than me, but wouldn-¦t be the correct answer that x=5/4? 
|

Billy Hardcore
Jaded.
155
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 13:02:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nutmegpainter wrote:This should be spammed, retweeted, and rammed down cccp's (hehe) throat I've heard about countless engagements that just didn't happen because of patch #dontCensorMe #becauseOfpatch
#spammed #retweet # quoted #whatHEsaid #BillyFleet |

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
538
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 13:29:00 -
[45] - Quote
corbexx wrote:I'll be over in Iceland for the summit in a week so That may be a good chance to get alot of data and I'll be able to talk to them then and there about it.
As much as i dont like various changes there won't be any knee jerk reaction till we have solid information to attually act on Can you also ask them to show comparative graphs between incursion NPCs killed in hisec, lowsec, and nullsec vs sleepers killed in each class of W-space, starting a year before incursions were introduced up to the present?
It might also be interesting to see a comparative graph between npcs killed in Nullsec regions for a year before the ESS to present and sleepers killed in each class of W-space over the same time, combining the graph with the incursions data as well.
Overall, while some of the Hyperion changes suck, they aren't bad enough to drive people out if the income was still good here. But if people were already thinking about moving out, these changes could have made up their minds for them.
The Hyperion changes aren't the problem, though they don't help. The problem is people starting to consider moving out in the first place.
|

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
687
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 14:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
Meytal wrote:corbexx wrote:I'll be over in Iceland for the summit in a week so That may be a good chance to get alot of data and I'll be able to talk to them then and there about it.
As much as i dont like various changes there won't be any knee jerk reaction till we have solid information to attually act on Can you also ask them to show comparative graphs between incursion NPCs killed in hisec, lowsec, and nullsec vs sleepers killed in each class of W-space, starting a year before incursions were introduced up to the present? It might also be interesting to see a comparative graph between npcs killed in Nullsec regions for a year before the ESS to present and sleepers killed in each class of W-space over the same time, combining the graph with the incursions data as well. Overall, while some of the Hyperion changes suck, they aren't bad enough to drive people out if the income was still good here. But if people were already thinking about moving out, these changes could have made up their minds for them. The Hyperion changes aren't the problem, though they don't help. The problem is people starting to consider moving out in the first place.
yes I can certainly ask that. Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |

umnikar
Fishbone Industries
43
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 15:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
Meytal wrote:corbexx wrote:I'll be over in Iceland for the summit in a week so That may be a good chance to get alot of data and I'll be able to talk to them then and there about it.
As much as i dont like various changes there won't be any knee jerk reaction till we have solid information to attually act on Can you also ask them to show comparative graphs between incursion NPCs killed in hisec, lowsec, and nullsec vs sleepers killed in each class of W-space, starting a year before incursions were introduced up to the present? It might also be interesting to see a comparative graph between npcs killed in Nullsec regions for a year before the ESS to present and sleepers killed in each class of W-space over the same time, combining the graph with the incursions data as well. Overall, while some of the Hyperion changes suck, they aren't bad enough to drive people out if the income was still good here. But if people were already thinking about moving out, these changes could have made up their minds for them. The Hyperion changes aren't the problem, though they don't help. The problem is people starting to consider moving out in the first place.
Where's the point to look at comperative graphs on differnt kind of NPC kills? |

Moloney
Faceless Men
140
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 15:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:Before you all grab your already overused pitchforks can we not use this lopsided small batched graph to ask CCP for more data to be released?
CCP Fozzie could do an amazing blog with all the WH data they have i am sure, but why would he want to with the level of hate that has been on these forums lately.
Because it is his job. |

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
540
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 16:22:00 -
[49] - Quote
umnikar wrote:Where's the point to look at comperative graphs on differnt kind of NPC kills? Food chain.
PvP oriented players hunt each other, but more frequently hunt those running PvE sites. As the quantity and quality of PvE sites diminish, so do the numbers of those running them, and so do the numbers of PvP oriented players to feed on them.
You don't see this kind of thing in Hisec, for obvious reasons. And you really don't see it in Null as much as you'd think. Lowsec has long claimed PvP starvation. It seems to be happening in W-space as well.
If there is a strong correlation between increasing incursion or nullsec NPC kills and a simultaneous decline in W-space NPC kills, that might indicate that Corbexx's W-space income numbers need to be looked at far more seriously than I expect they'll look at them. Maybe, just maybe, it might mean they don't give incursions yet another buff, if the data indicates they are a problem, and instead buff W-space.
Fozzie said income potential in (high-class) W-space is the highest in the game. But if numbers there are declining in favour of elsewhere, it's not just raw numbers that need to be looked at. The income NEEDS to be high to provide incentive to be here after offsetting any costs to replace losses. Even if you have high income, if you're losing more and having to replace enough such that either you lose in time or ISK, you will leave. Too many people doing this hurts the rest of us.
Many people have accused incursions of hurting W-space. Is it true? This data that I'm asking about can be a potential indicator to help confirm or deny such accusations. We probably won't see this data, but hopefully the CSM (ie: Corbexx) can take it, mix it with the data he is generating regarding W-space income, and MAYBE guide CCP's hands a little bit so they stop playing with the food chain quite so flippantly, if that is what's happening.
|

Ahost Gceo
Rolled Out Triumvirate.
215
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:13:00 -
[50] - Quote
Meytal wrote:umnikar wrote:Where's the point to look at comperative graphs on differnt kind of NPC kills? Food chain. PvP oriented players hunt each other, but more frequently hunt those running PvE sites. As the quantity and quality of PvE sites diminish, so do the numbers of those running them, and so do the numbers of PvP oriented players to feed on them. You don't see this kind of thing in Hisec, for obvious reasons. And you really don't see it in Null as much as you'd think. Lowsec has long claimed PvP starvation. It seems to be happening in W-space as well. If there is a strong correlation between increasing incursion or nullsec NPC kills and a simultaneous decline in W-space NPC kills, that might indicate that Corbexx's W-space income numbers need to be looked at far more seriously than I expect they'll look at them. Maybe, just maybe, it might mean they don't give incursions yet another buff, if the data indicates they are a problem, and instead buff W-space. Fozzie said income potential in (high-class) W-space is the highest in the game. But if numbers there are declining in favour of elsewhere, it's not just raw numbers that need to be looked at. The income NEEDS to be high to provide incentive to be here after offsetting any costs to replace losses. Even if you have high income, if you're losing more and having to replace enough such that either you lose in time or ISK, you will leave. Too many people doing this hurts the rest of us. Many people have accused incursions of hurting W-space. Is it true? This data that I'm asking about can be a potential indicator to help confirm or deny such accusations. We probably won't see this data, but hopefully the CSM (ie: Corbexx) can take it, mix it with the data he is generating regarding W-space income, and MAYBE guide CCP's hands a little bit so they stop playing with the food chain quite so flippantly, if that is what's happening. Well think about it, Incursions have a stupidly (and recently buffed -wtf-) high income and there is nowhere near the risk in running them. If incursions were completely neutered as an income source at this point, you'd have a ton of players leaving the game, so unfortunately this is not an option. To that end, you could say that the system was flawed from the start and now the meta for earning isk in incursion vs. wormhole space is so ingrained the problem can't be fixed without slashing a good chunk of the player community. I will point out again that the only way wormhole space will be competitive again is if the income from that space is increased again through blue loot being buffed.
This could stymie and even reverse the hemorraging of players from w space, but only if the Hyperion changes are rolled back. Simply buffing blue loot income only changes part of the equation, and not enough to the point where the risk is worth the reward for most people. If you were farming sites with caps previous to the patch, you may have been vsited by Blood Union. Now with random holes that take forever to roll the risk is too high for small corps as evidenced by the exodus of such groups from w space in recent weeks.
Oh wait, this has all been told to CCP before. No wonder why I feel like I am repeating what others have said. CCP ignore me please, I make too much sense. |

AssassinationsdoneWrong
The Nexus 7's
256
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:32:00 -
[51] - Quote
Meytal wrote:umnikar wrote:Where's the point to look at comperative graphs on differnt kind of NPC kills? Food chain and WOT
Because obviously everyone will leave Wspace straight to incursions 
If people seriously think incursions are easy isk they will do what any normal person in eve will do and put an incursion alt in them. If people were that risk aversed that they safe closed all the time to rat then what exactly has wspace lost? People like that get snagged probably once or twice a year and have farmed 10's of billions of isk for them not to care when it does happen. So I wish them personally a fond farewell.
For all those saying "Hey let's not get too hasty on a few weeks of stats" isn't this EXACTLY what the new multiple expansion system was touted as being for? For seeing immediate stats effects and being able to reverse them on a dime if necessary if the short-term data showed it was a flop?
Seemed to me that was what every single guest dev at the AT was saying was singularly the best part of the new system.
The Nexus 7's
What we fall short of in numbers we more than make up for in stupidity |

Billy Hardcore
Jaded.
155
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:35:00 -
[52] - Quote
I would like to point out that hyp launched at almost the exact same time ALOT of ppl started to go back to school as summer was ending. These "numbers" are most likely affected by this. #BillyFleet |

Ahost Gceo
Rolled Out Triumvirate.
216
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 17:38:00 -
[53] - Quote
Billy Hardcore wrote:I would like to point out that hyp launched at almost the exact same time ALOT of ppl started to go back to school as summer was ending. These "numbers" are most likely affected by this. While that certainly could be a factor (as it was for myself) there is entirely too much negative feedback on the forums to not say that this had a negative effect on active numbers in w-space. CCP ignore me please, I make too much sense. |

Meytal
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
540
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 18:56:00 -
[54] - Quote
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:Meytal wrote: Food chain and WOT
Because obviously everyone will leave Wspace straight to incursions  Of course not. Nor did I imply such. Effective reading comprehension would have let you see that I suggested this might be one of the possible reasons for increasing lower population in wormhole systems. World of Tanks migrations can't be measured, and I suspect you're at least intelligent enough to know that. I'm just asking for something that can be measured.
Face it, the PvE crowd goes where the money is the best for the level of risk they want to endure. When you have a lot of huntable targets in W-space, you draw a lot of hunters. And you draw even more hunters who prey on the novice gankers and who clash violently with one another in glorious spaceship explosions. But without the PvE, your PvP won't last long.
As the number of targets decrease, your normal PvP corp will evaluate their options and see what they can change or need to change to keep their members happy and their bloodlust sated. If the environment was a target-rich environment, there would be no question: keep hunting the targets.
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:If people seriously think incursions are easy isk they will do what any normal person in eve will do and put an incursion alt in them. If people were that risk aversed that they safe closed all the time to rat then what exactly has wspace lost? People like that get snagged probably once or twice a year and have farmed 10's of billions of isk for them not to care when it does happen. So I wish them personally a fond farewell. If your PvE types spend more time in hisec running incursions and end up just using the hole for PI, your scenario is backwards: they'll put alts in a hole for PI and move their assets to safety in hisec where they spend their time. Why put that much at risk if all you do is jump out to hisec all the time for incursions?
Your PvP types probably already have alts in incursion fleets. I'm not talking about the PvP types at this time, since I am suggesting they follow the prey, not lead them.
We can't get rid of incursions, but the results may show that they don't need the buffs people keep crying for and CCP keeps delivering. The results may show that everything is fine. I doubt it, but that is a possibility. The reason I'm asking for this information to be reviewed is that I suspect incursions have indeed hurt W-space, and I think the information I've requested might show this. Then I trust that Corbexx will do his best for the whole of W-space to try to convince CCP things need to improve.
I would further suggest that we need those carebears who rarely get caught to serve as encouragement for those who aren't quite as experienced. "Yeah, we can pull in billions per month and almost never lose anything; you just have to be careful." They serve an important part of the food chain, helping to convey the illusion that you're safe in W-space. That they continue to succeed (in safety) where others continue to fail can also galvanize groups to try to be that "good" or even "better".
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:For all those saying "Hey let's not get too hasty on a few weeks of stats" isn't this EXACTLY what the new multiple expansion system was touted as being for? For seeing immediate stats effects and being able to reverse them on a dime if necessary if the short-term data showed it was a flop?
Seemed to me that was what every single guest dev at the AT was saying was singularly the best part of the new system.
Sometimes it takes a long time to see trends. Sometimes it doesn't. What I'm asking to have analyzed is a long-term trend, if it exists. Looking at the numbers of towers being anchored vs unanchored for a few months before Hyperion to now, and comparing that to previous years, that's a quick trend that can be analyzed for imminent danger.
This could also be part of a much-longer cycle: you over-hunt a given area, the targets die off / move out for a while, the hunters starve / move out for a while. Then the lack of hostiles combined with dreams of wealth entice the prey back into the hole, drawing the hunters once again.
That is, if the prey doesn't find something else that's easier, safer, and just as (or more) profitable.
Billy Hardcore wrote:I would like to point out that hyp launched at almost the exact same time ALOT of ppl started to go back to school as summer was ending. These "numbers" are most likely affected by this. The numbers I'm requesting be reviewed would take this trend into account for multiple years. |

AgentFiftySix
Rolled Out Triumvirate.
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:05:00 -
[55] - Quote
Where is Proc to politely tell this gentleman to post with his main. |

Ahost Gceo
Rolled Out Triumvirate.
218
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
AgentFiftySix wrote:Where is Proc to politely tell this gentleman to post with his main. Poast with main fgt. CCP ignore me please, I make too much sense. |

umnikar
Fishbone Industries
43
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 19:55:00 -
[57] - Quote
So, "people" will move to incursions? Wondering how you know what...only bob knows!
|

Aiyshimin
Imperial Collective Unsettled.
66
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 20:21:00 -
[58] - Quote
CivilWars wrote:I recall before we even left w-space, which was before Hyperion was even announced, that we would rage roll for HOURS finding nothing, or have chains that had 20+ systems in them with nothing. Some people act like every w-space system was occupied pre-Hyperion, which isn't true. Yes, Hyperion has likely made it worse, but much of that is just because of people who refuse to even give the changes a chance, and decided before anything bad even happened that they were done.
That was exactly my experience of C5 space for a very long time before Hyperion, endless chains full of **** all nothing.
We moved to a C4 (in the middle of the w-space highway) and it's exactly like the good old days of wormholes, active chains yielding varied encounters every day and absolutely no need to rage roll.
**** the whiners
|

Winthorp
2700
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 20:54:00 -
[59] - Quote
corbexx wrote:
yes I can certainly ask that.
Sure ask, but when they have said several times they don't look at comparatives between WH,LS,null and incursion ISK levels to make decisions it kinda becomes a mute point and a waste of what data we could get.
I have for a long time said income in low end WH's is pathetic and needs a buff but the old whining about you can make more in incursions and lvl 4's in HS falls on deaf ears with CCP and won't help us. |

Winthorp
2700
|
Posted - 2014.09.08 22:00:00 -
[60] - Quote
Some useful data points: And note i think we need at least two years of graphed data.
Force fields active broken up by WH class
Capital losses broken up by those with and without sleepers on KM's and further broken up by WH class
Subcap losses broken up by those with and without sleepers on KM's and further broken up by WH class
Ore mined in WH space, again broken up by WH class
Gas mined in WH space, again broken up by WH class
Industry jobs ran in WH space again broken up by WH class
Planetary Interaction data broken up by WH class
The amount of WH's spawned broken up per class, if possible to further break it up from those that have player interaction.
The amount of towers killed in WH space again broken up by class (Previously this data was released and showed more sieges in C2 WH's)
The amount of jumps recorded in the frig WH's and the amount of jumps recorded in WH's in same systems as the frig WH
The amount of jumps recorded in WH space broken up by WH class
A graph showing the most used ships in PVP losses in WH space. (I am aware it would be T3's but its after the T3's i am interested in)
The amount of hauler jumps recorded. Not broken up by WH class
The amount of active EVE accounts the have characters logged out in WH space and LS,Null space broken up by WH class
Sleeper kills broken up by WH class and further broken up with the below data points
The amount of Melted Nano ribbons collected in each WH class
The value of Blue loot collected in each class of WH
Will most likely edit this post as i think of more useful data points. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |