| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13286
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 14:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
So long as it stays on the test server I don't mind. Keep it off tranq though, arenas always kill PvP outside of them in every game they are added to. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13286
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 14:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:dexington wrote:CCP Veritas wrote:Have you ever wanted a little pewpew but didnGÇÖt have the time to find a fight, or even fit a ship? is this really the crowd you think should be rewarded?, do you really think sugar coated bullshit pvp is going to add anything to the sandbox? screw the sandbox, its going to add to CCP financial statement.
No it won't. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13286
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 14:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:So long as it stays on the test server I don't mind. Keep it off tranq though, arenas always kill PvP outside of them in every game they are added to. Nice logical fallacy, just like people don't run sites in lowsec because they can run them in high sec right? Rofl, nice tears.   
I have had this move pulled on me before and it was disastrous to that game. I do not want the same to happen here. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13291
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: I have had this move pulled on me before and it was disastrous to that game. I do not want the same to happen here.
Nice appeal to emotion and logical fallacy, you are obviously biased because your corporation is into "non-consensual" pvp. You forgot that people that go/live in null or in the fw warzone won't magically disappear but having to roam for hours to find good fights is terrible for the game it lowers the player retention and give them no short term objectives, people "poaching" them to brave newbies and rvb doesn't help. This is a sandbox, your way to play is not the only way to play deal with it and adapt brobro.
In every single game that has added arenas the PvP in all other areas was sucked into them. The more more that join the arenas the fewer targets there are to hunt so more people join the arenas and we end up with a runaway effect untill we have everyone in arenas. This has happened in every single game that has added them and will happen in this one too. FW will die, RvB will die and null will also be impacted.
This is a terrible thing to have on Tranq and always will be. This thing is as Un-EVE as it gets and is utterly incompatible with EVE core gameplay. It will not add more players to the game and the same people who get bored with hunting for targets will get bored with arenas after the same length of time. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13291
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Varesk wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:
This is a sandbox, your way to play is not the only way to play deal with it and adapt brobro.
adding instances is not a sandbox, that is a theme park. It's not a theme park because you still have choice, this is made for people that want to get a "good" fight in a decent amount of time what is wrong with that? Do you dislike the AT and NEO too? I'm not sure if I can take your opinion seriously if all you do is log in to jump to a cyno and press F1, good for you tho. Competitive pvp has its place in eve, deal with it and adapt. 
So where is my choice to backstab you and bring in a buddy in a rattlesnake?
As said, instances are not a sandbox, they are restricting options. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13292
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:In every single game that has added arenas the PvP in all other areas was sucked into them. The more more that join the arenas the fewer targets there are to hunt so more people join the arenas and we end up with a runaway effect untill we have everyone in arenas. This has happened in every single game that has added them and will happen in this one too. FW will die, RvB will die and null will also be impacted.
This is a terrible thing to have on Tranq and always will be. This thing is as Un-EVE as it gets and is utterly incompatible with EVE core gameplay. It will not add more players to the game and the same people who get bored with hunting for targets will get bored with arenas after the same length of time. No, the problem with arenas in wow, since it's the prime example, is that there is no incentive to go in the middle of the map looking for something. This won't remove FW, this won't remove plexes, this won't remove corp roams, this won't remove solo pvp against the odds, it's an additional option. Wow has no fw, no plexes, no corp roams, no solo pvp against the odds.For example GW2 has a "competitive" pvp system outside the pve map but a lot of people are still roaming the WvW map, why? Because there is an incentive to go to the WvW map but for wow you can stay in the cap all day, so it's a terrible analogy you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. The AT is "un-eve" and it's still pretty popular and a lot of people outside eve were interested, eve has clunky legacy stuff just because CCP is trying to fix it doesn't mean it's "un-eve" because you don't like that gameplay. This is a sandbox, your way to play is not the way to play simply deal with it.
I played SWG when they added arenas, I saw all the PvP outside of it dry up in a matter of weeks. The same will happen here. This isn't about us stopping you from doing something you want to do in game its about stopping something that will massively damage the game in the long run.
We already have ways of setting up 1v1 matches in the duel systems, go use that.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13294
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: So where is my choice to backstab you and bring in a buddy in a rattlesnake?
As said, instances are not a sandbox, they are restricting options.
It's next to my option to bomb your nullsec assets and have access to your API to gank your bearalts. baltec could give you his API if he wanted, but you cannot allow him to gank you inside dojo. Do you see a difference? One is a player choice to do something or not, another is invisible wall of themepark mechanics. Do you also cry because you can't blob the AT? And also you are wrong, if the odds of him giving me his api were the same as the odds of people that will grief the dojo system we wouldn't need invisible wall, they are here because without them the competitive and fair setup is nulled. Is it too hard to understand?
So its not sandbox then is it? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13296
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: So its not sandbox then is it?
Eve stopped being a sandbox because of the AT?
You keep on going on about how we shouldn't stop you from doing what you want in the sandbox yet you seem fine with removing our sandbox.
This thing is not compatible with the sandbox in its current state. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13296
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Querns wrote:baltec1 wrote: This thing is not compatible with the sandbox in its current state.
Neither is Singularity, and yet Eve seems to be okay despite this. How are dojos any different than logging onto Singularity and doing the same thing?
They would be on the main server. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13296
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: So its not sandbox then is it?
Eve stopped being a sandbox because of the AT? You keep on going on about how we shouldn't stop you from doing what you want in the sandbox yet you seem fine with removing our sandbox. This thing is not compatible with the sandbox in its current state. No, you used some flawed logic about being able to do everything I did the same. It's not compatible with your gameplay, I'm sad for you but this is a sandbox, sorry you are not part of the target demographic for this feature.
Its not a sandbox element if it is an instance.
I have just as much right to gank you as you have to go do a 1v1. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13299
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 15:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Querns wrote:baltec1 wrote:Querns wrote:baltec1 wrote: This thing is not compatible with the sandbox in its current state.
Neither is Singularity, and yet Eve seems to be okay despite this. How are dojos any different than logging onto Singularity and doing the same thing? They would be on the main server. My point is that if you want no-consequence PvP, you can already log into Singularity and do it there. Dojos don't add anything new to Eve in this regard.
They do on tranq. There should never be a way to shield yourself from enemy actions while you are PvPing on tranq. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13301
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: I have had this move pulled on me before and it was disastrous to that game. I do not want the same to happen here.
Nice appeal to emotion and logical fallacy, you are obviously biased because your corporation is into "non-consensual" pvp. You forgot that people that go/live in null or in the fw warzone won't magically disappear but having to roam for hours to find good fights is terrible for the game it lowers the player retention and give them no short term objectives, people "poaching" them to brave newbies and rvb doesn't help. This is a sandbox, your way to play is not the only way to play deal with it and adapt brobro. In every single game that has added arenas the PvP in all other areas was sucked into them. The more more that join the arenas the fewer targets there are to hunt so more people join the arenas and we end up with a runaway effect untill we have everyone in arenas. This has happened in every single game that has added them and will happen in this one too. FW will die, RvB will die and null will also be impacted. This is a terrible thing to have on Tranq and always will be. This thing is as Un-EVE as it gets and is utterly incompatible with EVE core gameplay. It will not add more players to the game and the same people who get bored with hunting for targets will get bored with arenas after the same length of time. He really doesn't get it. The big blue doughnut has killed EvE and is "utterly incompatible with EVE core gameplay. It will not add more players to the game and the same people who get bored with hunting for targets" will continue to remain as bored as they are now. This will give your entire group of line members something to actually do while the rest of you sit on overturned chairs and stroke each other's ego. And p.s. FW won't die. It has the most content in the game with system constantly pushing 2k kills/day for almost the last 2 years bc we actually fight for and defend our systems instead of hide behind timers and tidi blue ball fest. But in moments where it's hard to find something that isn't linked garmur faggotry or Razor/Snuff/angry Russians/etc style of blobbing this would fun to quickly bounce over to and get a few fights to keep the skills honed. Keep wearing those blinders Baltec1, maybe they'll cone off and you'll remember how fun EvE used to be when there was constant content of all forms going on
It will die just like the PvP in all of those other games did.
The instant gratification mob are by far the worst crowd to cater to, soon after adding 1v1s they will demand 10v10s. Before long we will find PvP rank systems and then all PvP will happen in the arenas. It has happened time after time after time in the exact same way to every single game that added arenas. We joined EVE because it is not like all of those countless other games. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13301
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: Its not a sandbox element if it is an instance.
I have just as much right to gank you as you have to go do a 1v1.
No, no you don't, you have ways to gank people within a setup, just like being docked dojos aren't part of that setup. Do you also complain about not being to gank the AT teams?
This arena would not let us enter it. So yes, it stops our sandbox. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13303
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
Regnag Leppod wrote:baltec1 wrote: It will die just like the PvP in all of those other games did.
Do please feel free at any time to provide a list of sources showing PROOF of these overly dramatic claims. You keep repeating it, yet never once have I seen a link showing the financial downfall of a game being directly linked to the addition of arenas.
SWG and WoW are two very big examples. Then we have Tamriel, an EVE like game that imploded when they catered to the instant gratification mob. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13303
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: This arena would not let us enter it. So yes, it stops our sandbox.
I can't bomb your nullsec assets so it's not a sandbox, I can't blob the AT teams so it's not a sandbox, I can't kill people in station so it's not a sandbox, I can run pve missions so it's not a sandbox, etc If you think that eve stopped being a sandbox because of stuff like AT then maybe eve isn't the right game for you, HTFU.
1. yes you can
2. AT has nothing at all to do with what happens on tranq
3. what has this to do with anything?
Point remains, you are stopping me from entering the arena to kill you, this goes against the sandbox. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13303
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:Dave Stark wrote:I'm still curious as to why the irrelevant AT and other similar events keep getting brought up. Because what this dojo is, is a tool given to players to create, manage, and grow their own personal tournaments in between the AT and the NEO. It's about creating one more exciting layer of content for anyone and everyone to get involved with....if they choose. Miners to provide minerals for the construction of the dojo (hopefully), haulers to move ships and fittings, market traders to provide the necessary equipment and the list goes on.
We can already do this and have done for well over a decade. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: Point remains, you are stopping me from entering the arena to kill you, this goes against the sandbox.
Everything you said is wrong, nice damage control. You still don't understand, you can gank people within a setup, being in a station and in dojos isn't part of the setup. I want to trade in station all day, you want to gank me what happens? Is eve not a sandbox because you can't gank me? Nice logic.
I can destroy your market.
We are talking about undocked ships, blocking people from interfering in your dojo goes against everything about EVE. You should never be safe like this in space especially in PvP. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:30:00 -
[18] - Quote
Edward Olmops wrote:baltec1 wrote: 1. yes you can
2. AT has nothing at all to do with what happens on tranq
3. what has this to do with anything?
Point remains, you are stopping me from entering the arena to kill you, this goes against the sandbox.
On the contrary. The whole purpose of the thing is that you enter and (try to) kill me. :-D Only you have to come without a cyno and/or a 20-man gang. And actually there could be a fun fight for BOTH parties involved which is rather rare otherwise. About the sandbox issue: Are in-game contracts to be condemned? Because the game mechanism guarantees you cannot cheat? (as long as everyone reads the thing) Is the market to be condemned? Because no one can just steal from the market? Isn't that completely un-sandboxy???
Both the market and contracts can be used to scam people. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:You realize that people having their own play style in the EvE sandbox is EvE' s core. It's their entire marketing strategy that you can be, do, act however you want in game. And guess what, if you want to be a ring leader you'd now have the chance.... Mind blown 
You can do that already.
Blocking people from being backstabbing vagrants is taking away from the sandbox. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Regnag Leppod wrote:Domanique Altares wrote: Guild Wars 2 also never had open world PvP. Both sPvP and WvW are separate game modes that one must elect to enter into.
This is fact, as it is with many MMOs. It does not, however, invalidate that the introduction of custom arenas didn't kill World vs. World.
The fact that WvW ended in the games that did have WvW when they added arenas does make that argument invalid. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:38:00 -
[21] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:
By this logic (as well as some of your previous posts) then wouldn't any program used outside of being logged into the EVE client be a violation of the games core(and founding) principles? I mean by your reasoning, instanced gaming is any situation in which players can interact with game mechanics with zero interference (and risk) from other players.
Jabber lets you play EVE Offline, EVEMon basically give you the advantage for long term skill training and sp optimization. Dotlan provides information on system activity and traffic, allowing you to avoid dangerous systems, EFT allows you to optimize ship fittings without having to physically own the ship, EVE Survival turns PvE into a Prima Game Guide, EVECentral allows you to inspect universe markets as compared to just a region, and yet none of these are made available in the game client, none of these contain an element of risk, and yet every one of these give distinct and significant advantages to players who use them, as compared to the new players.
All of those tools help you, they do not block people from attacking you which is what these dojos will do. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13307
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
Regnag Leppod wrote:
My guess is that you won't provide statistics because you can't, and that for every game you claim crashed and burned because of this spectre of yours, I could find ex-players who place the blame on issues completely unrelated.
Feel free to find a SWG vet that will tell you that world pvp ended for any other reason than because they added that accursed battleground. Hell, in space the only place you ever found PvP was in the space battleground, I spent hours flying around in a mining ship while pvp active and not a single person went for me. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13309
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 16:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ruric Thyase wrote:
What I wrote
All of those tools help you, they do not block people from attacking you which is what these dojos will do. I don't think I've ever had a ship destroyed while I was on dotlan looking for alternate routes through a danger zone and thus blocked someone from atttacking me... And dojos will allow people to attack you, just one at a time :P (yay humor!)
It didn't block people from attacking you in EVE.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13316
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Seamus Donohue wrote:Guys? Read the post. CCP Veritas wrote:2. Outside of the actual matches, there should be ways to screw with the dojo itself
{snip}
ThereGÇÖs a personal deployable that you can obtain from item redeption on Duality that when put into space and stocked with ships and modules (itGÇÖs huge), provides players docked in that system with the ability to fight each other with those ships and modules in fair environment. Whoever is deploying this dojo has to shove ships and modules into it. Somebody has to buy or manufacture those ships and modules. The minerals and moon goo to make those ships and modules must come from player activity. All this is is a way for one player to subsidize another player's PvP. Dojos on Duality might have stuff automatically spawned into them but only because it's Duality. CCP Veritas is not proposing that Dojos on Tranquility will have free stuff spawned into them by CCP. Additionally, Veritas explicitly states "Outside of the actual matches, there should be ways to screw with the dojo itself", implying that the dojo can be attacked. It's only the deadspace matches that cannot be interfered with. Nobody is proposing bringing Simulator Mode to Tranquility; Simulator Mode is already provided by Singularity and Duality. --- Now, the only concern I have is that if this is deployed to Tranquility, then this can be used as a method to leave a station that is currently camped. You can get your pod and implants out into space, bypassing the station camp, or get a force of pilots out into space and then warp to the station camp and optimals, rather than be forced to either use instant undock bookmarks (or in the case of bubbles, be forced to fight on the station undock spawn point). "Simulator" isn't the issue, in fact a simulator (while being un-eve like also) would actually be ok because that doesn't mean 'ships in space on TQ that can't be probed down'. And yes, someone, somehow will find a way to take these things and make CCP regret putting them in. ESS in wormholes and anomalies anoyone?
Storing gank ships inside them to use when people are camping the station. Placing a booster alt inside one. Its a deadspace so given enough time you can slowburn a rattle into it, have it cloak and then farm frigates. New players will enter them and get wiped out, turning them into effectively a farm for killmails. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13316
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:
The instant gratification mob are by far the worst crowd to cater to, soon after adding 1v1s they will demand 10v10s. Before long we will find PvP rank systems and then all PvP will happen in the arenas. It has happened time after time after time in the exact same way to every single game that added arenas. We joined EVE because it is not like all of those countless other games.
WE?? Dont speak for me please, I joined to shoot spaceships - which is hard to do lately. Your fault, by the way - blue donut and all that. If arenas allow my to pew and bypass your blobbing and other null- and low- faggotry, great!
All we ask is to be allowed to backstab you. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13316
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:04:00 -
[26] - Quote
Steppa Musana wrote:baltec1 wrote: All of those tools help you, they do not block people from attacking you which is what these dojos will do.
Doesn't matter. In high-sec two players can agree to duel and do so in a safe. You have realistically no chance of figuring this out, much less scanning them down and getting to them in time to interfere. What we can see from this scenario is that the two players who actually want a fair duel cannot be affected by you, nor do they affect you. The problem with the current scenario is there is no way for two random players to do this without risking 5 logi alts interfering with the fight. There are players who duel like this - which is fine - and players that want a fair duel. A dojo gives the fair players an option to guarantee a fair fight. It does not affect a 3rd party like you, it only affects the ability for an agreeing duel member to interfere via alts or friends. Considering both parties agree not to do this when entering the dojo, this only affects those parties, never you or anyone else. That is their choice, not yours.
My choice to blow up their poorly fitted cruiser with a neutron mega is just as valid as yours to engage in a 1v1 honour duel. That's what the sandbox is. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13316
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:05:00 -
[27] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: All we ask is to be allowed to backstab you.
All we ask is to be able to destroy your station assets and have access to your alts. If it's a true sandbox we should be able to, am I right?
No, your line of argument is as stupid now as it was when you started. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13321
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:07:00 -
[28] - Quote
Steppa Musana wrote:Quote:Storing gank ships inside them to use when people are camping the station. Neutral Orca. Quote:Placing a booster alt inside one. Adjust boosts mechanic to not apply outside this area. Quote:Its a deadspace so given enough time you can slowburn a rattle into it, have it cloak and then farm frigates. New players will enter them and get wiped out, turning them into effectively a farm for killmails. Could you not do the same with FW sites? And yet no one does it.
They are hard to set up in low sec and a mostly unknown tactic. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13321
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:08:00 -
[29] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
Thanks, I was using your logic.
Again you use that word while demonstrating a lack of it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13321
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote: All we ask is to be allowed to backstab you.
Yeah, go and reinforce the dojo, or have 10 catalysts ready as i land on the dojo and attempt to enter it. Or join the dojo corp, rise to position of power, then steal the frigates out of the dojo.
Quote:Fights need to be un-screw-with-able. We strongly feel that if whatGÇÖs supposed to be a GÇ£fairGÇ¥ match given a set of predetermined rules is thrown off course by outside influence, it invalidates the whole premise.
This is the part we are not happy about. This should never happen in EVE. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13325
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:Bamboozlement wrote:
Thanks, I was using your logic.
Again you use that word while demonstrating a lack of it. Uh, you are not very smart, since I'm in a good mood I'll explain slowly; - You asked for something stupid like being able to gank a dojo, while the point of the dojo is to have fair and controlled fight - I asked for something stupid like being able to get the API of a character in game while the point of having an API is to only give it to people (you think) you can trust. I can go even slower if it's still hard for you to understand.
You still don't grasp that this game is one in which while you are undocked and in space shooting at another ship you are open to attack from other ships. This idea flies in the face of this core aspect of the game and reduces options that I want to take. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13325
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: Baltec1, respect, but the popularity of the tournaments we all enjoy says otherwise. We enjoy those on a very regular basis, and the same logic that necessitates their isolationist nature holds true for this situation as well.
Competition and training in 5 minute matches isn't going to harm the harsh nature of EVE in the slightest... other than to perhaps raise the general quality of pilot you meet in combat.
Gotta disagree. I can take the tool as something cool and handy for running your own competitions but I cannot back something that will effectively instance you from the rest of EVE and stop people from messing with you. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13326
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:
If you can have YOUR unfair fights, why can I have MY fair fights. Whose entitlement do we have to bow to? Why can't we have both?
We do have both right now. You can run 1v1s and I can backstab you and vice versa. This removes my option to backstab you (and adds a bunch of underhand uses a few of which I pointed out) Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13330
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:37:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
Except that you can still gank the non-dojo 1v1, and that player run 1v1s are hard to normalize (implants, mods, neut logis, etc).
We cannot gank them because;
Quote:Fights need to be un-screw-with-able. We strongly feel that if whatGÇÖs supposed to be a GÇ£fairGÇ¥ match given a set of predetermined rules is thrown off course by outside influence, it invalidates the whole premise.
Just because something requires effort on your behalf does not mean I should have my gameplay negetivly impacted. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13330
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:38:00 -
[35] - Quote
Anslo wrote:
You whine a lot about new ideas proposed for Eve. If you don't like them, maybe Eve is not the game for you?
If you want instanced arenas why don't you play one of the many many games that has them? Why force them into the one game that doesn't cater to them? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13330
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:43:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:
The potential abuses you mentioned is a whole other can of worms that isn't really worth getting into because if this thing ever gets beyond its first day of existence, they are things that CCP would flesh out with the help of the community.
Just because I have the option of backstabbing you does not mean that I subjectively value doing so as my preferred way to engage in 1v1 PvP. The added hassle of worrying about neutral logi alts (my own or yours) is not worth my time and organization, thus depriving me of the content of 1v1 PvP. This seems like an alternative to that.
I will say again, I only want this in the scope of 1v1. I want people to be able to mess with the dojo, I don't want people to abuse the deadspace area, I think it is still EVE-like to have the ships destroyed.
If you don't like it, don't use it. If you like it, use it. What wrong with having that option?
Remember when people said the industry changes would ruin EVE? Those were some fun threads. Speaking of which, Im surprised I haven't seen Dinnsdale Pirannah, the resident doomsayer.
He would be on your side, anything that reduces non-consensual pvp is good in his eyes.
My issue is with the enforced instance, I should not be barred for getting into it. Make it hard to do sure but not stopped entirely. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13330
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:That is not a LAW that is just a link to the evonline website. Please link this LAW to which you refer.
Also Baltec, no one is FORCING EVE to have these arenas. They were introduced on a test server less than 24 hours ago. The people here arguing with you are the people who are saying "We dont mind of this" or "We think this would be fun" I dont think there has been a single post on this thread to the tune of:
"YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THESE CHANGES OR EVE IS FOREVER RUINED"
Compare and contrast...
If they add them to tranq then they will indeed be forced upon me. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13333
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
Anslo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Anslo wrote:
You whine a lot about new ideas proposed for Eve. If you don't like them, maybe Eve is not the game for you?
If you want instanced arenas why don't you play one of the many many games that has them? Why force them into the one game that doesn't cater to them? I never said anything about whether I wanted something or not, now did I?
Just pointing out that EVE has differentiated itself from every other MMO by not doing arenas. Many people do come here for that very reason. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13333
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:51:00 -
[39] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:
If they add them to tranq then they will indeed be forced upon me.
Then quit.
I wonder, why are you even here?
You want to change everything about EVE to be just like every other game out there. Why beg and plead to change EVE rather than play those games? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13333
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:52:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:
I really think you'll find a large number of non CareBorgs using them as well, just for different reasons. They'd actually be pretty handy for certain things.
Thats the fear. Why go hunting for solo pvp when you can push a button to get it? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13333
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 17:54:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ruric Thyase wrote:That is not a LAW that is just a link to the evonline website. Please link this LAW to which you refer.
Also Baltec, no one is FORCING EVE to have these arenas. They were introduced on a test server less than 24 hours ago. The people here arguing with you are the people who are saying "We dont mind of this" or "We think this would be fun" I dont think there has been a single post on this thread to the tune of:
"YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT THESE CHANGES OR EVE IS FOREVER RUINED"
Compare and contrast... If they add them to tranq then they will indeed be forced upon me. Explain, because that made no sense. Content that is available that you choose not to use is not content that is forced upon you. Its an option, not a demand. I don't do reverse engineering or inventions, but that doesn't mean I despise people who do t2 and t3 production, I in no way feel they are "Forced" upon me and I in no way want to limit others from pursuing that method of gameplay. If they have fun with it, great. I find my fun in EVE elsewhere.
In every game that has added arenas the same exact thing has happened.
People join the arena, fewer people are out to fight with so more people join the arena to get the fights. The more this goes on the more end up in the arena. Soon you wind up with near everyone in the arena pushing a button for instant pvp and pvp in the wider world is dead. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13338
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: Well, because there is no tangible reward for it in an arena...
There isn't in solo pvp either.
Ranger 1 wrote: and you are also limited to the ships and fittings the arena offers you... and the fact that there is a boundary to deal with... and you can't use tactical warp in/warp outs. There are a large number of reasons why people that actually are looking for PVP will only use the arenas for certain things, as a test bed and perhaps as a training arena for new pilots.
Other games also had limitations on the arenas and that didn't stop them from taking over.
Ranger 1 wrote: It will always lack the depth, variety, and reward of actual PVP... they are simply a convenient way to do certain (limited) things.
Don't get me wrong, I quite see what you are worried about. But I think it would be fairly simple to avoid those potential pitfalls.
Easy risk free PvP on demand will always trump roaming around hostile dangerous space with no guarantee of a fight. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13338
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:baltec1 wrote:
If they add them to tranq then they will indeed be forced upon me.
Then quit. I wonder, why are you even here? You want to change everything about EVE to be just like every other game out there. Why beg and plead to change EVE rather than play those games? I will answer your question with a question of my own. Why are you still here? Times, they be-a-changin' , you can clearly see the writing on the wall - CCP is preparing to mainstream the game and sell itself. Your 'gameplay' days are numbered - I can guarantee you they will, one step at a time, remove most of the more unpleasant aspects of the game. So, why are YOU still here, rather then on kickstarter trying to start up a True Sandbox game of some kind?
Because EVE is still EVE and I will continue to fight to keep EVE from turning into a clone of all of those other failed MMOS. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13342
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:
How's this different from POSgunning when a fleet shows up to RF a tower?
Fleet incaps guns, fleet is invulnerable to gun damage.
Arrendis wrote: The gunner can't be killed. His ship can't be damaged. All he needs to do is safe logoff after the POS goes into RF, and until then, collect any kills he wants.
The last competent POS that killed a lot of us was our own tower that went skynet. All other towers are incapped so fast POS gunning is more or less pointless.
Arrendis wrote: The dojo can be RF'd. The assets in space can be destroyed. The only thing that can't be a guaranteed 'it's dead, jim', is the pod, because the guys inside aren't there when they're not fighting. So where's the difference between these guys, and the solo POSgunner?
Its a 48 hour timer, the assets will be gone.
Arrendis wrote: I mean, personally, I see this as a step up from people going to Sisi to duel - people going to Sisi, you can't cause them meaningful harm on Tranq, and they don't even lose any assets. Here, at least it's costing someone money just to do it, right? And you can RF the dojo, even if you can't warp into the deadspace pocket 'inside', so you can screw with their future fights preemptively.
As an idea for a tool for organising events is a good one, its just the not ******* around with combatants thats the issue. You still need that risk otherwise its just going to suck in all of the 1v1 frigate fights. That and the ways we can abuse it because of this no ******* around inside mechanic. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13342
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:29:00 -
[45] - Quote
Nyctef wrote:ooh what if you stripped it down to the essentials and just had something that could generate frigate-only deadspace pockets like portable FW plexes it'd have to have a huge spool-up time, like 10 hours (because creating deadspace pockets is hard, right?) but you could dump it on your next stratop location and force it to be a frigate-only fight :D
sure, it'd create a huge defender advantage, but that's what the long spool-up time is for
So dump it on a POS and force everyone to fight over it with frigates? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13342
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:31:00 -
[46] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote:baltec1 wrote:You still need that risk otherwise its just going to suck in all of the 1v1 frigate fights. I see your "It will hurt small scale PvP" and raise you a "It will SHIFT small scale PvP into controlled and fair environments". If the change would attract a lot of people, then *maybe* it is a change that people actually want.
Which means I am correct in saying it will kill pvp outside of it. That isn't good for EVE. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:40:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sahriah BloodStone wrote:Seems to me that the people trying to 'protect eve's core nature' are doing the opposite based on a unproven assumption that it will take over the game.
Perhaps instead of instantly disliking the idea you guys can find constructive ways to improve the idea to prevent the things you don't want happening from happening
I think its fairly obvious that people require a few things. 1. All assets are destroyable inside the ring including pods 2. Dojo's can be reinforced/destroyed along with everything inside 3. Dojo's drop loot when destroyed 4. Some kind of limit needs to be imposed to prevent everyone from only using dojos forever. Limit to 1v1's? Only playable X matches per week?
Dojo's would allow new people or care bears to practice pvp in an environment they feel is educational. Being ganked by 20 dudes can only educate you so much. This allows more people a controlled access to pvp and will increase the amount of people learning and engaging in pvp.
It should also be lore related. some kind of minmatar capsuleer game? Through lore you can implement restrictions that people are looking for.
You people need to start working WITH ccp instead of against them.
We have, let the combatants be scannable so we can still backstab people. Even if they are hard to scan down it would remove the big issues with them. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:43:00 -
[48] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:
No confirmation on that - personally, I'd think when it gets RF'd, you shouldn't be able to extract any assets. It's non-functional at that point, and transferring things in and out is a function.
In addition, how does it get stocked? Do you do it from station, or do you have to take a hauler/carrier out to stock/unstock it? If you have to actually bring the stuff to it, and it's got an anchoring timer (so it can't be stocked immediately), then doesn't that make these things a potential target, and the hauler coming to put stuff into it even more of a target?
And if items can be removed from it during RF via hauler, then doesn't that just make an RF'd dojo cloaky dictor-bait, waiting for the owner to come and try to save his stuff?
These are things that have yet to be announced. For now based upon the info we have the only sticking point is the instanced matches. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:46:00 -
[49] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:baltec1 wrote:Which means I am correct in saying it will kill pvp outside of it. That isn't good for EVE. You mean PPPPPBvP, right? Player, player, player, player, player, booster vs. hapless Player - right?
Or just a single rattle or SB geddon Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:48:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:To not get scanned down for 5 minutes? LOL  Not really seeing the potential for abuse there my friend.
Marauder coming out of bastion that needs a safe spot before it docks. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:50:00 -
[51] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:I tried it and I like it very much. This is a prototype and I see a lot of potential in that idea. All you leet people here whinning about the dead of 1v1 are just ridiculous. Flying for hours and searching for someone to kill with your off grid booster and cyno ready, is just pathetic and should not be the focus of PvP oriented gameplay design. Arenas are fine for people that want just fights. No drama, no ogb, no falcon, no blob, just figts. PvP in general - 1v1, fleet, blob, whatever - in my opinion should happen where player interests collide. This can be sov or fw or hunting explorers, haulers, or other juicy targets whereever you want. But it should focus on the friction that different interests generate.
So *thumbs up* from me. I hope the feature get's more dev time and focus to become a great arena implementation with betting, tournaments and competitions, maybe even leaderboards, crack and whores.
As I said, who wants to go hunt things and risk being blobbed when you can push button get fight. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:51:00 -
[52] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:To not get scanned down for 5 minutes? LOL  Not really seeing the potential for abuse there my friend. Marauder coming out of bastion that needs a safe spot before it docks. How would you get your marauder in there if all ships and fits have to come from the dojo and cannot leave the "arena"?
Same way we get them into FW ded sites. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 18:58:00 -
[53] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote: What if the "arena" is not static and changes places every 5min?
Does it?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:01:00 -
[54] - Quote
Mangala Solaris wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:baltec1 wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:To not get scanned down for 5 minutes? LOL  Not really seeing the potential for abuse there my friend. Marauder coming out of bastion that needs a safe spot before it docks. Okay, you lost me on this one... I'm probably being dense. Currently it's frigates only, it takes two people to enter that match (although you "could" start a match with an alt)... but if you're able to fly to the arena you aren't in Bastion Mode anyway. You can't warp back to the same spot (or warp to a friend engaged in a match) without ending up at the station while the match is ongoing... and I'm not sure why a safespot in that spot would be any different that a safespot anywhere else? The way it works is you and an opponent pick ships from a selection already in the dojo, match is created and you are magically placed inside the ship you chose. Anyone trying to warp to you, say if you fleet them during the 5 minutes, simply gets warped to the dojo deployable itself, not the arena. So I think outside parties using it to hide would be SOL unless they had an exact duplicate of their current ship sat unassembled in the dojo.
Does the ded site you use stay in the space place? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:02:00 -
[55] - Quote
Mangala Solaris wrote:baltec1 wrote:Johnathan Coffey wrote: What if the "arena" is not static and changes places every 5min?
Does it? Its a random arena every time - or at least each DS pocket I used today seemed to be different ranges from parts of the system each time. I'll do further testing of course incase I was just blind.
Please do, if its static then I can get in, if it swaps around then we can at least remove two underhand uses of it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13343
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:Bold added by me Because getting blobbed isn't fun? Because blobbing people is just lazy? Because being in a blob doesn't require and skill? https://zkillboard.com/kill/41450192/That is not PvP, That is what is killing PvP in EVE, not this 1v1 dojo
The issue is that most people looking for 1v1s will just use these things rather than going out roaming and PvP in the wider world will be greatly harmed. All you are doing is proving my point that people prefer to use arenas over having to go out and look for a fight and take bigger risks of things going wrong for them. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote: Yeah, I know. That's why I figured I was missing baltec1's point somehow. I'm not sure how a Marauder coming out of Bastion and needing a safe spot benefits in any way.
Aggression timer. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:10:00 -
[58] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote:baltec1 wrote:The issue is that most people looking for 1v1s will just use these things rather than going out roaming and PvP in the wider world will be greatly harmed. The first part of the sentence does not in any way imply the second part, unless you consider blobbing soloers the main aspect of PvP.
PvP is PvP. Having fewer targets around is bad for solo player and blobber alike. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
Ruric Thyase wrote:
Right, because when you take out a 7 man gang of t1 cruisers, its your fault for getting hotdropped by supers. You just didn't try hard enough and take a big enough risk to get "The good stuff"
Honestly, I would probably use the dojo with my corpmates. That at least is the biggest appeal I see for it. I think if you added larger fleets, betting/gambling, then it becomes a larger risk of affecting PvP I will agree. I do however think this has a lot of potential to be a great teaching tool, especially for new players.
As a tool for teaching and running events I like it, it just needs to lose the no messing around with fights mechanic. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:13:00 -
[60] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote: UNLESS the soloer gets a lot more targets and the blob gets only a few less (boring because helpless) targets.
soloer and blobber will not be getting more targets in the wider world if they are all in dojos will they? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:17:00 -
[61] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:baltec1 wrote: As a tool for teaching and running events I like it, it just needs to lose the no messing around with fights mechanic.
But that mechanic's exactly what makes it so useful a tool for teaching: the teacher and student can focus on the lesson being taught, rather than trying to teach while looking over your shoulder all the time.
That is the most important lesson in EVE by far. You don't need to be impossible to scan in order to teach people how to fight. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:18:00 -
[62] - Quote
Johnathan Coffey wrote: if they are all in dojos they are getting targets non-stop. that's kind of the point.
Which means the wider world PvP is being hurt. This is exactly what I am warning you people about, arenas suck pvp out of the rest of the world. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:21:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mangala Solaris wrote:baltec1 wrote:Mangala Solaris wrote:baltec1 wrote:Johnathan Coffey wrote: What if the "arena" is not static and changes places every 5min?
Does it? Its a random arena every time - or at least each DS pocket I used today seemed to be different ranges from parts of the system each time. I'll do further testing of course incase I was just blind. Please do, if its static then I can get in, if it swaps around then we can at least remove two underhand uses of it. Definitely changes every time. I just ran a few matches v an alt, recording distance from sun and the dojo deployable every time. Anything from 3 AU to 12 AU off both each match. Obviously could be different in larger systems.
Thank you.
Next up, can you test how long the matches last and can you get a booster tengu/command ship in them? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:baltec1 wrote: That is the most important lesson in EVE by far. You don't need to be impossible to scan in order to teach people how to fight.
It totally is the most important lesson in EVE. I agree with that 100%. That said, the most important lesson when learning to drive is 'everyone else on the road can **** up, too', but that doesn't mean the first few lessons of every Driver's Ed course don't take place in a controlled environment without other drivers, like a closed course, or a controlled school parking lot.
My first lesson involved a main road, a bus route and several encounters with 40ft Volvos Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:31:00 -
[65] - Quote
Sephira Galamore wrote:baltec1 wrote:Thank you.
Next up, can you test how long the matches last and can you get a booster tengu/command ship in them? Can't you do that..? Seriously, you spend all that time in this thread arguing and portray a notable personal interest in this feature/its abolishment, yet you cannot update Duality and try it yourself before attempting to debate everyone to the ground?
No I cant. Hence why I am having to dig for info on the damn things. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:33:00 -
[66] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:baltec1 wrote: can you get a booster tengu/command ship in them?
Well, if it's 1v1 in frigates, I'd guess the answer is 'no'.
Wouldn't be the first time we broke something like this. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13345
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:34:00 -
[67] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:baltec1 wrote:My first lesson involved a main road, a bus route and several encounters with 40ft Volvos  And this was in an actual Driver's Ed course that insurance companies give premium discounts for taking, and the State allows as credit toward getting your license a year early? That must've been a heck of an environment to learn how to get a feel for the clutch in...
Its the UK. Over here you do the theory test and then get to it Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13347
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:40:00 -
[68] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Xorth Adimus wrote:Two pods enter, one pod leaves..
Edit.. Also this needs a spectator mode so anyone in system can watch. Viewable on the screen in your captains quarters. 
We have 3km widescreens in space and you want a telly in a cupboard? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13348
|
Posted - 2014.09.25 19:51:00 -
[69] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Yeah, unless something is broken you can only take frigates into the match/arena.
I'm more concerned as to whether a booster in system affects frigates in the arena... hopefully not.
Veritas said in his OP that he hadn't set up anything special for Concord... meaning that you'll likely have Concord interrupt your duel if you attempt one in high sec currently.
I would expect boosters to work given that CCP have yet to solve off grid boosting. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13359
|
Posted - 2014.09.26 05:23:00 -
[70] - Quote
Yun Kuai wrote:baltec1 wrote:Johnathan Coffey wrote:baltec1 wrote:You still need that risk otherwise its just going to suck in all of the 1v1 frigate fights. I see your "It will hurt small scale PvP" and raise you a "It will SHIFT small scale PvP into controlled and fair environments". If the change would attract a lot of people, then *maybe* it is a change that people actually want. Which means I am correct in saying it will kill pvp outside of it. That isn't good for EVE. Then you need to be asking yourself why it will kill outside pvp? Remember this: not everyone has a sea of blues and instant jabber pings to back them up **** hits the fan. Explain to me why it will kill outside pvp and then you can fix outside pvp so that these two can co-exist. -Hot drops -Capital drops -Gate camps with cloaked falcon/carrier on standby -Links + broken ships; see garmur -Only finding 10 man gangs with 5 logi and 1 BB -Blueball strategies where the plan is to avoid all fights to make people avoid your space -Roams lasting hours with no viable targets for your solo ship; see gangs/camps/etc Amazing that while I enjoy all of that listed above it would be nice to avoid all of that from time to time to have a truly 100% skills-based fight where no one can interfere to see how good you really outside the "blob" fleets
Give people a safe, easy and instant option to pvp then that is what they will pick. The fewer people out and about the fewer targets you have when roaming which only makes the appeal of instant access to solo pvp all the greater. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13363
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 17:50:00 -
[71] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Dear Bamboozled, you might try to respect the fact that many of the folk posting in this thread simply do not like the idea of special snowflakepvp arenas on TQ.
You are of course entitled to your opinion, but simply spamming this thread is not best way to support your support for special snow flake pvp arenas.
Keep them on SiSi or a new special snow flake pvp arena server and all will be fine. There is a difference between having an opinion and posting poor, unresearched posts full of logical fallacies. You have something against dojos? You think CCP shouldn't implement them? Fine, but use logical and compelling arguments instead of leveraging fear with doom and gloom comments. I wouldn't have to come here and highlight poor posting from people that dislike consensual pvp out of self-entitlement and common misconceptions about what is eve. This is what you can do in Eve Online consensual pvp in eve exist since 2005, solo pvp videos and AT/NEO stream are popular, you don't like consensual pvp? Good for you, but it's part of the sandbox and it's not "un-eve" just because in your eyes "your way to play is the only way to play". Ironically, eve is all about risk vs reward a lot of people posting against dojos are extremely risk-averse.  Please try to focus.
AT is not part of the sandbox, they are a stand alone event hosted by CCP in space we have no access to using tools have had no access to. There has never been any point in the last 14 years in which we have had consensual PvP on Tranq. The only people looking for risk free PvP are people who want to lock out everyone else from their honourable PvP 1v1 matches. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13364
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:09:00 -
[72] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:
Can someone lay aside the rhtoric and explain to me exactly HOW this would break Eve if it ever came to pass? Can the rest of you calm down as this is a prototype . . .
m
No MMO has ever managed to add arena PvP and not have it have a disastrous effect upon the wider world PvP. The reason why many are very anti arena is because we have been through all of this before. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13364
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:11:00 -
[73] - Quote
Please post the mechanic that is on tranq right now or at any point in the last 14 years that is both available to everyone and stops others from interacting with you while your are in space and in combat with another player. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13364
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:21:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: Please post the mechanic that is on tranq right now or at any point in the last 14 years that is both available to everyone and stops others from interacting with you while your are in space and in combat with another player.
Please do not use logical fallacies against me : https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/loaded-questionYou made a statement : consensual pvp doesn't exist in eve, I proved you wrong with publicly available factual data and you answer back with a logical fallacy?  Please try to focus.
Yea you did no such thing and throwing around phases such as "logical fallacies" does nothing to back up your argument. Its a very simple questions that is easily answered, the fact that you cannot just shows that you are just wasting everyone's time. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:42:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:baltec1 wrote:
Please post the mechanic that is on tranq right now or at any point in the last 14 years that is both available to everyone and stops others from interacting with you while your are in space and in combat with another player.
When certain ships were unprobeable (before being patched) they could duel safely in any safespot without fear of interuption. m
The fact that this was patched shows that it wasn't intended.
This is the problem people have with this thing if it ever finds its way onto tranq. It will be the first time in EVEs history that a mechanic was put into the game with the intention of it stopping others from interacting with you while you are in space. Its a massive change of direction for EVE and one many are not comfortable with. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:I don't have a problem with the dojo idea, but I worrry about abuse. I have not been on the test server to try it, so perhaps this is not an issue. Let's say I have my dojo deployed in my home system. I try to undock, but a hostile Interdictor bubbles the undock. So, my alt and I undock and activate my dojo. What happens? Do my alt and I warp off to my protected Deadspace pocket? If my alt and I are ratting in the same system and a hostile enters local, do I warp to a safe spot for the rest of the timer? Or several variations on this theme...
In short, I am concerned that device, if brought to TQ, will be used to avoid nonconsenual PVP. That would be devastating.
If someone wants to be an honorable space samurai and have fixed 1v1 matches, that is fine by me as long as real ships explode and there are still consequences in Eve.
You would be able to grab a D-scan of the area without having to undock into a station camp. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:47:00 -
[77] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: Yea you did no such thing and throwing around phases such as "logical fallacies" does nothing to back up your argument. Its a very simple questions that is easily answered, the fact that you cannot just shows that you are just wasting everyone's time.
I think you should read the link I sent you. You said, let me quote : baltec1 wrote: There has never been any point in the last 14 years in which we have had consensual PvP on Tranq.
I then gave you factual data of people having consensual pvp in TQ since 2005 proving you wrong: Please focus, thank you mate.
The first link was to an event I believe was run by CCP in space we cannot access, in which case they teleported people there. These things are not available to anyone other than CCP. If not then it took place in space in which I could have attacked them at any point.
The other links all involve areas in which I can interact with them against their will while they PvP. You have provided no evidence to back up your claim. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 18:52:00 -
[78] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:f u c k this forums
 Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 19:06:00 -
[79] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: The first link was to an event I believe was run by CCP in space was cannot access, inwhich case they teleported people there. These things are not available to anyone other than CCP. If not then it took place in space in which I could have attacked them at any point.
The other links all involve areas in which I can interact with them against their will while they PvP. You have provided no evidence to back up your claim.
Are you trolling? It is consensual pvp they both agreed to fight under some conditions (ship size, location, maybe timers?) This is a joke right? 
This seems to be a case of either you trolling or you not understanding what others are sying.
When we talk about consensual PvP we are not talking about what two people decide we are talking about the the whole game. Consensual PvP is when there are mechanics in place that stops others from interacting with you while you run your 1v1. EVE has never has such a mechanic in it before and it is this mechanic that people are against. We don't care if you want to organise a 1v1 with someone we just care about a mechanic being put in place that stops us from interacting with you while you are doing it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 19:24:00 -
[80] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:This seems to be a case of either you trolling or you not understanding what others are sying.
When we talk about consensual PvP we are not talking about what two people decide we are talking about the the whole game. Consensual PvP is when there are mechanics in place that stops others from interacting with you while you run your 1v1. EVE has never has such a mechanic in it before and it is this mechanic that people are against. We don't care if you want to organise a 1v1 with someone we just care about a mechanic being put in place that stops us from interacting with you while you are doing it. Then your definition of consensual pvp is wrong, don't blame me.  What you are trying to say is that since CCP didn't give an option to players to have fair and competitive pvp till now, they shouldn't implement it. It's as stupid as saying CCP shouldn't have implemented the new Industry UI because we had no good industry UI for years, despite the need for one. Competitive and fair pvp exist in eve since 2005, just because it's incompatible by design with a specific gameplay in eve (ganking) doesn't mean CCP should leave it under-designed and clunky. Using the same logic I can say that CCP shouldn't change sov null because bad and clunky sov null is part of eve, same for POS management and anything that need a change. Drop your self-entitlement, your way to play eve isn't the only way.
The real irony here is having you demand a sandbox then in the next sentence demand that everyone elses sandbox be take away.
Also please stop telling both lies and trying to compare totally different things to each other. There has never been a mechanic in place that forces "fair" fights in EVE. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 19:26:00 -
[81] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:You asked for an example and I provided one.
Your counter was that the example was patched.
By that line of reasoning IF the Dojo was put in place and it was seen to be counter to the games purposes and play then it would be patched. Your faith in Eve and its dev team is appreciated.
Please forward a new objection as you have asked and answered this one and I agree with you on the conclusions.
m
Problem here is that we have seen several things added that had to be patched later after causing a great deal of damage. I would rather not have the damaging things happen in the first place. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 19:36:00 -
[82] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: The real irony here is having you demand a sandbox then in the next sentence demand that everyone elses sandbox be take away.
Also please stop telling both lies and trying to compare totally different things to each other. There has never been a mechanic in place that forces "fair" fights in EVE.
You understand that dojos are destroyable ? You understand that ships will explode ? You understand that ships have to be bought and put in dojos ? You understand that player have to put dojos up ? Of course you can't interact with the people inside it would be counterproductive since the goal si to provide a competitive and fair environment. Please try to focus.
The goal is for an arena, you can have that without taking away one of the core selling points of EVE from people. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13365
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 19:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
Regnag Leppod wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:
everything you want this for can be satisfied by a non-TQ server.
So you are okay with multiple shards then?
Only when they are test servers. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13366
|
Posted - 2014.09.27 20:39:00 -
[84] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:Daichi Yamato wrote:back pedaling is all yours
'of course it won't teach you metagame stuff like "hey this is PL in local they might hotdrop/blob you or hey this solar system is always camped by x pirates, etc"
this kind of 'meta-game' awareness or the ability to form and fund larger fleets are much more likely to allow you to succeed in eve than actual pilot skill. thats what i was saying all along.
if you dont like the riot analogy, change it to a street fight. if all you know is fair fights, set numbers and rules, you arent much cop when anyone can bring any number of weapons and friends to a fight or you can be interrupted at anytime by a third party. Except that mechanical skill is still relevant even with non-consensual fights, please read my post again.  Manual piloting is what makes the difference between a good tackle and a great tackle, same for small to mid gang engagements that logi surviving because he had good angular velocity/positioning might win you the fight. I guess it might be too hard to understand for someone that only play the game to press f1. 
Tackle in these dojos is redundant as the enemy is going nowhere so thats one lesson they will not be learning from these things. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13374
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 05:58:00 -
[85] - Quote
Toriessian wrote:baltec1 wrote: AT is not part of the sandbox, they are a stand alone event hosted by CCP in space we have no access to using tools have had no access to. There has never been any point in the last 14 years in which we have had consensual PvP on Tranq. The only people looking for risk free PvP are people who want to lock out everyone else from their honourable PvP 1v1 matches.
Thats a lot of effort, ISK, and time by a lot of players, and a lot of advertising on the part of CCP to be "not part of the sandbox"
Its not. We do not have access to either the space used or the tools used by CCP to run it. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13374
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 06:13:00 -
[86] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
That's an extremely and unreasonably narrow view of "part of the sandbox".
No it is an exact fact. None of us have access to these things or anything else that can stop other people from attacking you while you PvP in EVE.
Alvatore DiMarco wrote: You have to be able to fly there and gank the participants, or it's not part of the sandbox? The AT takes place on TQ using ships built and paid for on TQ. The ship, module and drone losses affect the market on TQ. The ships that are given out as winnings are on TQ and sold for ISK on TQ. That money funds pilot activities on TQ that might not have happened otherwise.
And all of those things are so small they have zero impact upon the game.
Alvatore DiMarco wrote: Yet you still choose to say that it's not part of the sandbox, despite all the effects it has on the sandbox, simply because you cannot fly there? It's a controlled environment specifically because gankers would ruin it for everyone and destroy the tournament completely if they could. Your inability to get past the walls does not disqualify something as being part of the sandbox or not.
If it stops others from attacking you while in space while you PvP then yes it does disqualify it from being part of the sandbox. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13374
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 07:15:00 -
[87] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:baltec1 wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote: That's an extremely and unreasonably narrow view of "part of the sandbox".
No it is an exact fact. But again, the prize ships come out of it, and they affect the sandbox. Which means the AT affects the sandbox.
They have as much impact upon the game as the federate issue megathron. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13376
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 12:36:00 -
[88] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote: And don't forget that this is a quality of life change for people that organize tournaments, more content for eve.
You can already organise tournaments, this idea is only adding tools to make it easier and is in fact removing content in the form of people attacking said tournament. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13376
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 12:36:00 -
[89] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:PastyWhiteDevil wrote:...and i believe it undermines the effort that those of us who have learned the hard way had to put in. "I had to walk thirty miles in neck-deep snow, so you should have to do it too." That's what this sounds like.
God forbid you have to face something challenging in a game Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13377
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:06:00 -
[90] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
I think you're either missing or ignoring the point.
PvP is challenging. Nobody's complaining that PvP is too hard. The person I'm quoting, however, says more or less "learning PvP was difficult for us, so it should have to be difficult for everyone else too because it was difficult for us before they got here."
That's neither fine in a game nor in real life - but especially not in a game, where the goal is to have fun.
Let me be blunt. **** sandbox purity if it means logging off to find fun elsewhere because the Old Boys' Club thinks EVE has to be a god-awful pain in the ass.
These arenas won't help anyone learn how to PvP in EVE as they are very different to what you will find in the wider world. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13377
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:13:00 -
[91] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: It will block others from attacking your ship in space, that's removing content.
It's ok because it's adding content with the dojo interaction, your statement would be true if dojos weren't player made and destroyable. Well it's not the case.
Its not adding content because you can already do 1v1s. It is removing the ability for me to shoot your ship while you are in combat, thus it is removing content. This is a hard fact. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13377
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:26:00 -
[92] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
But then again, what do I know? **** everyone else and **** what anyone else wants, because EVE should only be fun for one playstyle, right?
Notice that the only people wanting to get rid of another persons playstyle are the people who are defending a mechanic that stops others from interacting with you in this 1v1 arena.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13377
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:35:00 -
[93] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:baltec1 wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
But then again, what do I know? **** everyone else and **** what anyone else wants, because EVE should only be fun for one playstyle, right?
Notice that the only people wanting to get rid of another persons playstyle are the people who are defending a mechanic that stops others from interacting with you in this 1v1 arena. That's a strawman and you know it. Nobody's saying to get rid of anything. I'm doing my level best to present rational arguments and I demand the same in return.
Its not a strawman its the truth.
You keep on insinuating that "gankers" are demanding their playstyle be the one and only one when in fact, everyone so far is all in agreement that its ok to run 1v1s. Ironically the only playstyle that is being negetivly impacted is the gankers if this hits tranq as they will no longer be able attack people doing these honourable 1v1s. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13377
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
But then again, what do I know? **** everyone else and **** what anyone else wants, because EVE should only be fun for one playstyle, right?
Notice that the only people wanting to get rid of another persons playstyle are the people who are defending a mechanic that stops others from interacting with you in this 1v1 arena. CCP didn't remove your playstyle when they designed covops ships and stations either. You can't always gank people in EVE, but you have other ways to interact with them.
When you are fighting someone in PvP with your ship you are neither cloaked nor in a station. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13382
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 13:48:00 -
[95] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
When you are fighting someone in PvP in a fair and controlled environment that has no rewards and only risk (of losing your ship) you shouldn't get ganked by people for no reason.
That you are there and shooting at each other is reason enough.
Bamboozlement wrote: The EVE philosophy is risk vs reward, not "gank everyone because I want to" this is how CCP designed the game, dojos respect this philosophy.
Having an area in space in which two people are fighting that is impossible for anyone else to enter is not something we have ever seen before.
Bamboozlement wrote: Ganking is not the only way to interact with people in EVE Online, yes I understand that you like ganking but this isn't baltec1 Online, please drop your self-entitlement and respect the sandbox.
I respect your right to do a 1v1, why do you not respect my right to blow both of you up? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13383
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 14:00:00 -
[96] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
"I has broken the sandbox because I said so, despite the fact that dojos are player made and destroyable"
Just like EVE Online stopped being a sandbox in 2005 with the first AT tournament right? It was all a lie.
As you have been told several times now AT takes place in space nobody but CCP can access and uses tools nobody but CCP has access to. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13383
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 14:05:00 -
[97] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:
And I told you over and over that it was for technical reasons and that dojos will fix it.
Doesn't change the fact that AT is not comparable to what happens in game as it happens in jove space and uses tools nobody has ever had access to. Please stop trying to use this lie. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13385
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 14:11:00 -
[98] - Quote
Bamboozlement wrote:baltec1 wrote: Doesn't change the fact that AT is not comparable to what happens in game as it happens in jove space and uses tools nobody has ever had access to. Please stop trying to use this lie.
It didn't happen earlier in game just because CCP had no tools for it (hell this they only release this as a prototype in 2014..) you can't give players manual "moveme" and fit check commands, imagine the abuse..  My point is : it's in the game since 2005 and players have been trying to emulate that environment/gameplay for years. Again I respect the fact that you don't like it, but don't try to say it's not in the game.
It isn't.
We have never in the last 14 years had any mechanic in place to would stop me from attacking people partaking in a 1v1. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13389
|
Posted - 2014.09.28 16:38:00 -
[99] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:baltec1 wrote:
We have never in the last 14 years had any mechanic in place to would stop me from attacking people partaking in a 1v1.
Because we haven't then we shouldn't is a very weak argument. Step back and look at that one before I reducto ad absurdum all over it. m
Using that logic EVE should add pandas. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13971
|
Posted - 2014.11.23 12:36:22 -
[100] - Quote
Bastion Arzi wrote:
Wel ive read some more of them and they seems to boil down to "but i wanna gank your ship in space and if ur preventing me from doing that ur removing content" without really addressing the fact that ccp are actually adding content into the game.
What content are they adding here? You can already organise 1v1s and this thing will indeed remove content from people who want to pvp you.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
| |
|