EVE Search - C-J6MT Siege. The end.

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

C-J6MT Siege. The end.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
nync UA Industry Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:12:00 - [1] Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:14:30 Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:13:29 Second day. Local reached 250 ppl, but no major fights, just some sniping, gate ganking , station camping. Coalition did not dare to attack this day. Losses on both sides insgnificant, however coalition lost 1 carrier due to logging off on POS. 3 covert ops pilots did their job well. Third day. At some point local reached 415(Jita style). with about 80-90 RA pilots, the rest hostiles. 17:48 EVE time. 40+ Coalition capital ships attacked POS 3-1,effectivly putting it into reinforsed mode. Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. (12 RA bs were lost in this engagement due to pilots enable to load overview for more than 2-5 min.) Enemy dreds were engaged 3 times by RA BS fleet with support of fighters from carriers. After 4 drednoughts were killed in first 2 engagements whilst in reinforsed mode, being supported by carriers with remout shield and armor transporters, decision was made to engage capitals on warp out. Due to lag we managed to trap only remaining near POS 2 dreds and 2 carriers, 2 interdictors were lost in this engagement. After fight at POS, capital fleet retreated to 1v-, support and bs fleet started to leave system, the siege is over. An attempt to activate some modules on my tempest is still underway. results: Coalition + ASCN in 3 days of C-J6MT Siege manage to reinforse 2 POS. Coalition + ASCN loses day 3 (source RA killboard): Dreadnoughts -6, Carriers -1, Battleships - 21, HAC's - 2, Recon ships - 1, Interdiktors -4, Covert ops -5. RA losses: Battleships - 16, Recon ships - 1, Interdiktors - 3. Covert ops - 2. Props to ASCN pilots, some good fights and smack free local. Never fought you before, so was sort of change to something better comparing to coalition pilots. Thanks to all involved. This post is by no means offensive or smck and is just to finish my first post about day 1. p.s. worst thing that ebil aggressors forsed me to fly tempest, even if I like my scorp
anister Black Omega Security E.R.A	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:15:00 - [2] yay another thread. ___ Eve @ oGame
Nukeitall	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:21:00 - [3] It occurs to me that the EVE news thing needs to have a little ticker somewhere to alert us to these various happenings. --------- >>Disclaimer: Anything Nukeitall says is not to be taken seriously. Mostly.
Major Dim Caldari eXin Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:30:00 - [4] Grats RA!GJ guys! Give em hell! ------------- .....It went where it came from....
Zigadenus M. Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:37:00 - [5] Originally by: nync An attempt to activate some modules on my tempest is still underway. Me too. GF RA. Boo CCP. ________________________________________________ Kyle > Why do you have to ask me all these complicated questions? Zerodragon > Dude, IÆm trying to save your setup from complete suckage.
Kye Kenshin Beagle Corp	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:37:00 - [6] Nice one RA. www.beaglecorp.com
King Dave Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:45:00 - [7] gg ra ------------------------------- don't speak english... f1, f2, alt-q!
Jay Phor Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:50:00 - [8] Originally by: nync Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:14:30 Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:13:29 At some point local reached 415(Jita style). with about 80-90 RA pilots, the rest hostiles. 17:48 EVE time. 40+ Coalition capital ships attacked POS 3-1,effectivly putting it into reinforsed mode. Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. (12 RA bs were lost in this engagement due to pilots enable to load overview for more than 2-5 min.) Enemy dreds were engaged 3 times by RA BS fleet with support of fighters from carriers. After 4 drednoughts were killed in first 2 engagements whilst in reinforsed mode, being supported by carriers with remout shield and armor transporters, decision was made to engage capitals on warp out. Due to lag we managed to trap only remaining near POS 2 dreds and 2 carriers, 2 interdictors were lost in this engagement. this game isnt buged or? guys stop that till ccp fix the lag problem ( maybe at in EVE-Online 2 or use the new CCG to play lagfree :P )
Darko1107 Caldari E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:58:00 - [9] Summary of whole C-J seige to come? How many cap ships is that now!!! ------------------ Sig removed, please keep it under the 24,000 byte limit, if you have any questions please email [email protected] - Xorus
Zoron REUNI0N Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:28:00 - [10] This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses!

Jenny Spitfire Caldari LoneStar Industries Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:30:00 - [11] Originally by: Zoron This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance and Alts and Slave Corps vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses! Fixed. RA 4TW. ---------------- Cruelty is God's way of showing kindness.
Selfe Caldari UK Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:50:00 - [12] Gfs RA. So when you gonna start mining in c-j again? Your signature is too large. Please see the Forum Rules for the limits - Serathu ([email protected])
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:34:00 - [13] Originally by: Selfe Gfs RA. So when you gonna start mining in c-j again? Actualy i`m doing it right now.
Mc Leech The xDEATHx Squadron	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:36:00 - [14] We killed some carriers, we killed some dreads, we still have cj. However that was not the biggest victory we achived. At first people where slow to react, scheptical and negative. On the last day of the seige RA gang was much bigger than any gang RA had for at least last 6 months probobly much longer than that. Even through the lag was horrible that gangs performance and team work was amazing. Now our gangs are bigger, still well organized, and ready to kick some butt. In my oppinion that is the real victory. Get ready coalition cause you are going down.
steveid Penetrate	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:51:00 - [15] /become fanboi great stats again. It must be so frustrating to be on the other side. Anyone who says that this is a basis of lag only needs to look at the mc / blue war or the goon / bob war to see how it could go otherwise. TBH i wish i spoke russian so i could learn from how these guys do it. Supposedly bad tactics or not, they do what they can in the game mechanics in a similer vein to m0o.
Edison Frisk Minmatar Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:54:00 - [16] Originally by: Mc Leech Get ready coalition cause you are going down. cant we all just get get along
End Yourself Core Domination	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:29:00 - [17] Originally by: nync Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. lol, how many years of POS war did it take for the coalition to learn some basics? --- Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity.
munchy Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:49:00 - [18] IBE (in before ens), you guys are doing a great job, i dont think theres another alliance in game who would even attmept to fend off the gang ***you guys are facin. --- Originally by:** Kaaii (UCC) We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.
Psan Vigilante Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:57:00 - [19] Sounds like a few decent fights actually happened. Wish I coulda been there, but im outta town and about the best I can do is read forums. Hope to see C-J again once lag is a little better or whatever.GG RA + friends, and I'll see you all in space when I'm back in town. :)
Walter Model CRICE Corporation	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:06:00 - [20] Good Stuff RA! _______________________________________________ "If the tanks succeed, then victory follows.", Guderian, 1937.

Beyond Horizon Solar Dragons Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:06:00 - [21] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Originally by: Zoron This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance and Alts and Slave Corps vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses! Fixed. RA 4TW. Hi I am so pathetic. Fixed. - BH
Poundrock Eve University The Big Blue	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:20:00 - [22] Sounds like a job well done! I really don't get to hear in game about what's happening in the rest of the eve-verse, but from following all the drama in the forums, I feel like I'm gettin' some kinda picture about the goings on in other regions. And I'm sure we're prolly set to -10 from all sides involved hehe, but regardless i personally can't help but root for the "underdogs" in battles like these. Although, maybe they're not really the underdogs afterall... ;) Keep the news coming folks!
HatePeace LoveWar Amarr FATAL REVELATIONS Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:21:00 - [23] CCP fix the game b4 encouraging such warefare please. This game cannot support these numbers engaging and its really p1ssing a lot of players off. Taking nothing away from RA, gg and well done for fighting. http://members.lycos.co.uk/snailbrain/hateme.jpg signature removed (max size 24000 bytes) - please email us (with the signature URL) if you want to know why - Pirlouit([email protected])
Zudari eXin Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:28:00 - [24] woooooooooooo go RA you party animals you
Jitagirl	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:40:00 - [25] Funny that all people who cheer to RA would never want them in the neighbourhood
AngryTex Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 02:21:00 - [26] To RA, Congrats on an effective defense. However, not all your kills were remotely related to the defense of your pos or your tactics. Our last two dread losses are purely due to server-client issues. Both were aligned and warped out during gang warp. null Screenshot
Farscape Hw Solidline Enterprise	Posted - 2006.08.08 02:55:00 - [27] these threads are very interresting and i like them plz dont lock
ArcheryTXS Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 04:41:00 - [28] Originally by: Farscape Hw these threads are very interresting and i like them plz dont lock Yo , where r u been ? :) did not see u much around. ---------------------- And wnen u planning to come back , dear Coalition ? ;-) / City Sadness...
Aaron Static Deep Space Consortium Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 04:58:00 - [29] so this means we can just go back to shooting each other at gates?? hooray!!
munchy Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 09:56:00 - [30] Edited by: munchy on 08/08/2006 09:57:01 Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar CCP fix the game b4 encouraging such warefare please. This game cannot support these numbers engaging and its really p1ssing a lot of players off. Taking nothing away from RA, gg and well done for fighting. everyone else seems to be able to carry on the game with large scale fleets etc. you should try engaging RA with some smaller blobs maybe? instead of the 400 man blobs you usually seem to use to take a system edit - spelling --- Originally by: Kaaii (UCC) We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.