EVE Search - C-J6MT Siege. The end.

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

C-J6MT Siege. The end.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
nync UA Industry Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:12:00 - [1] Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:14:30 Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:13:29 Second day. Local reached 250 ppl, but no major fights, just some sniping, gate ganking , station camping. Coalition did not dare to attack this day. Losses on both sides insgnificant, however coalition lost 1 carrier due to logging off on POS. 3 covert ops pilots did their job well. Third day. At some point local reached 415(Jita style). with about 80-90 RA pilots, the rest hostiles. 17:48 EVE time. 40+ Coalition capital ships attacked POS 3-1,effectivly putting it into reinforsed mode. Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. (12 RA bs were lost in this engagement due to pilots enable to load overview for more than 2-5 min.) Enemy dreds were engaged 3 times by RA BS fleet with support of fighters from carriers. After 4 drednoughts were killed in first 2 engagements whilst in reinforsed mode, being supported by carriers with remout shield and armor transporters, decision was made to engage capitals on warp out. Due to lag we managed to trap only remaining near POS 2 dreds and 2 carriers, 2 interdictors were lost in this engagement. After fight at POS, capital fleet retreated to 1v-, support and bs fleet started to leave system, the siege is over. An attempt to activate some modules on my tempest is still underway. results: Coalition + ASCN in 3 days of C-J6MT Siege manage to reinforse 2 POS. Coalition + ASCN loses day 3 (source RA killboard): Dreadnoughts -6, Carriers -1, Battleships - 21, HAC's - 2, Recon ships - 1, Interdiktors -4, Covert ops -5. RA losses: Battleships - 16, Recon ships - 1, Interdiktors - 3. Covert ops - 2. Props to ASCN pilots, some good fights and smack free local. Never fought you before, so was sort of change to something better comparing to coalition pilots. Thanks to all involved. This post is by no means offensive or smck and is just to finish my first post about day 1. p.s. worst thing that ebil aggressors forsed me to fly tempest, even if I like my scorp
anister Black Omega Security E.R.A	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:15:00 - [2] yay another thread. ___ Eve @ oGame
Nukeitall	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:21:00 - [3] It occurs to me that the EVE news thing needs to have a little ticker somewhere to alert us to these various happenings. --------- >>Disclaimer: Anything Nukeitall says is not to be taken seriously. Mostly.
Major Dim Caldari eXin Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:30:00 - [4] Grats RA!GJ guys! Give em hell! ------------- .....It went where it came from....
Zigadenus M. Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:37:00 - [5] Originally by: nync An attempt to activate some modules on my tempest is still underway. Me too. GF RA. Boo CCP. ________________________________________________ Kyle > Why do you have to ask me all these complicated questions? Zerodragon > Dude, IÆm trying to save your setup from complete suckage.
Kye Kenshin Beagle Corp	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:37:00 - [6] Nice one RA. www.beaglecorp.com
King Dave Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:45:00 - [7] gg ra ------------------------------- don't speak english... f1, f2, alt-q!
Jay Phor Destructive Influence Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:50:00 - [8] Originally by: nync Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:14:30 Edited by: nync on 07/08/2006 21:13:29 At some point local reached 415(Jita style). with about 80-90 RA pilots, the rest hostiles. 17:48 EVE time. 40+ Coalition capital ships attacked POS 3-1,effectivly putting it into reinforsed mode. Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. (12 RA bs were lost in this engagement due to pilots enable to load overview for more than 2-5 min.) Enemy dreds were engaged 3 times by RA BS fleet with support of fighters from carriers. After 4 drednoughts were killed in first 2 engagements whilst in reinforsed mode, being supported by carriers with remout shield and armor transporters, decision was made to engage capitals on warp out. Due to lag we managed to trap only remaining near POS 2 dreds and 2 carriers, 2 interdictors were lost in this engagement. this game isnt buged or? guys stop that till ccp fix the lag problem ( maybe at in EVE-Online 2 or use the new CCG to play lagfree :P )
Darko1107 Caldari E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2006.08.07 21:58:00 - [9] Summary of whole C-J seige to come? How many cap ships is that now!!! ------------------ Sig removed, please keep it under the 24,000 byte limit, if you have any questions please email [email protected] - Xorus
Zoron REUNI0N Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:28:00 - [10] This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses!
Jenny Spitfire Caldari LoneStar Industries Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:30:00 - [11] Originally by: Zoron This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance and Alts and Slave Corps vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses! Fixed. RA 4TW. ---------------- Cruelty is God's way of showing kindness.
Selfe Caldari UK Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 22:50:00 - [12] Gfs RA. So when you gonna start mining in c-j again? Your signature is too large. Please see the Forum Rules for the limits - Serathu ([email protected])
UAxDEATH The xDEATHx Squadron	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:34:00 - [13] Originally by: Selfe Gfs RA. So when you gonna start mining in c-j again? Actualy i`m doing it right now.
Mc Leech The xDEATHx Squadron	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:36:00 - [14] We killed some carriers, we killed some dreads, we still have cj. However that was not the biggest victory we achived. At first people where slow to react, scheptical and negative. On the last day of the seige RA gang was much bigger than any gang RA had for at least last 6 months probobly much longer than that. Even through the lag was horrible that gangs performance and team work was amazing. Now our gangs are bigger, still well organized, and ready to kick some butt. In my oppinion that is the real victory. Get ready coalition cause you are going down.
steveid Penetrate	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:51:00 - [15] /become fanboi great stats again. It must be so frustrating to be on the other side. Anyone who says that this is a basis of lag only needs to look at the mc / blue war or the goon / bob war to see how it could go otherwise. TBH i wish i spoke russian so i could learn from how these guys do it. Supposedly bad tactics or not, they do what they can in the game mechanics in a similer vein to m0o.
Edison Frisk Minmatar Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.07 23:54:00 - [16] Originally by: Mc Leech Get ready coalition cause you are going down. cant we all just get get along
End Yourself Core Domination	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:29:00 - [17] Originally by: nync Capital fleet was supported by BS fleet staying 350 km from POS to load the grid and warping to 200 km to engage our attacking force. lol, how many years of POS war did it take for the coalition to learn some basics? --- Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity.
munchy Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:49:00 - [18] IBE (in before ens), you guys are doing a great job, i dont think theres another alliance in game who would even attmept to fend off the gang ***you guys are facin. --- Originally by:** Kaaii (UCC) We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.
Psan Vigilante Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 00:57:00 - [19] Sounds like a few decent fights actually happened. Wish I coulda been there, but im outta town and about the best I can do is read forums. Hope to see C-J again once lag is a little better or whatever.GG RA + friends, and I'll see you all in space when I'm back in town. :)
Walter Model CRICE Corporation	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:06:00 - [20] Good Stuff RA! _______________________________________________ "If the tanks succeed, then victory follows.", Guderian, 1937.
Beyond Horizon Solar Dragons Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:06:00 - [21] Originally by: Jenny Spitfire Originally by: Zoron This is not finally stats of C-J6MT Siege Red Alliance and Alts and Slave Corps vsAscendant Frontier/E.R.A/Knights Of the Southerncross/Lotka Volterra/Veritas Immortalis (RA)300 TOTAL SHIPS 67(Coalition) 37 796 TOTAL POINTS 2 577 87 Battleships 24 66 Cruisers 10 41 Frigates 22 30 Interceptors 4 14 Assault Frigates 1 9 Interdictors 2 8 Covert Ops 0 7 Battlecruisers 1 7 Carriers 0 6 Dreadnaughts 0 5 Shuttles 0 5 Heavy Assaults 1 4 Recon Ships 2 4 Destroyers 0 3 Rookie Ships 0 2 Command Ships 0 1 Stealth Bombers 0 1 Industrial Ships 0 PS. The bigger the numbers the better! Those are kills, not losses! Fixed. RA 4TW. Hi I am so pathetic. Fixed. - BH
Poundrock Eve University The Big Blue	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:20:00 - [22] Sounds like a job well done! I really don't get to hear in game about what's happening in the rest of the eve-verse, but from following all the drama in the forums, I feel like I'm gettin' some kinda picture about the goings on in other regions. And I'm sure we're prolly set to -10 from all sides involved hehe, but regardless i personally can't help but root for the "underdogs" in battles like these. Although, maybe they're not really the underdogs afterall... ;) Keep the news coming folks!
HatePeace LoveWar Amarr FATAL REVELATIONS Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:21:00 - [23] CCP fix the game b4 encouraging such warefare please. This game cannot support these numbers engaging and its really p1ssing a lot of players off. Taking nothing away from RA, gg and well done for fighting. http://members.lycos.co.uk/snailbrain/hateme.jpg signature removed (max size 24000 bytes) - please email us (with the signature URL) if you want to know why - Pirlouit([email protected])
Zudari eXin Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:28:00 - [24] woooooooooooo go RA you party animals you
Jitagirl	Posted - 2006.08.08 01:40:00 - [25] Funny that all people who cheer to RA would never want them in the neighbourhood
AngryTex Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 02:21:00 - [26] To RA, Congrats on an effective defense. However, not all your kills were remotely related to the defense of your pos or your tactics. Our last two dread losses are purely due to server-client issues. Both were aligned and warped out during gang warp. null Screenshot
Farscape Hw Solidline Enterprise	Posted - 2006.08.08 02:55:00 - [27] these threads are very interresting and i like them plz dont lock
ArcheryTXS Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 04:41:00 - [28] Originally by: Farscape Hw these threads are very interresting and i like them plz dont lock Yo , where r u been ? :) did not see u much around. ---------------------- And wnen u planning to come back , dear Coalition ? ;-) / City Sadness...
Aaron Static Deep Space Consortium Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 04:58:00 - [29] so this means we can just go back to shooting each other at gates?? hooray!!
munchy Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 09:56:00 - [30] Edited by: munchy on 08/08/2006 09:57:01 Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar CCP fix the game b4 encouraging such warefare please. This game cannot support these numbers engaging and its really p1ssing a lot of players off. Taking nothing away from RA, gg and well done for fighting. everyone else seems to be able to carry on the game with large scale fleets etc. you should try engaging RA with some smaller blobs maybe? instead of the 400 man blobs you usually seem to use to take a system edit - spelling --- Originally by: Kaaii (UCC) We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.
Kitty O'Shay Tharsis Security	Posted - 2006.08.08 10:37:00 - [31] Next time, just play best 3 out of 5 on Connect 4 for each POS. Less lag that way. -- [THARS] is recruiting 1 ebil pirate. Be the one!
Bluestealth Minmatar Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 12:31:00 - [32] Wait a sec, when did ASCN come in? Guess I havent been forum whoring as much as Munchy. GL to all.
Fitz Chivalry eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 12:31:00 - [33] I had a pretty good time in C-J overall but then I was in a ceptor and not at the POS (had lots of corp mates going nuts about being unable to load the overview, activate modules etc.). After the first days teething trouble the organisation of the operation was excellent I felt. RA proved very hard to catch in their BS fleet (very good discipline, all aligned, awareness of scanner etc) so there were no meaty fights but still, after I switched to a pure support gang we got to gank a few RA bait ships at the gates each time dashing in and out before the RA sniper BS arrived, which was fun and we got a very nicely fitted HAC kill, which is always good. Overall I would score this conflict (from the small ships perspective) about a 6.5/10. I am sure we will be back when lag is no longer the deciding factor of POS battles.
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 12:51:00 - [34] Originally by: Bluestealth Wait a sec, when did ASCN come in? Guess I havent been forum whoring as much as Munchy. GL to all. ASCN decided to backstab another alliance, not that it's big news or something, they didn't even have to search for a credible pretext this time (Scorpion-class battleships or lonely hauler losses not being all that rare today). However, RA was there LONG before ASCN (ASCN was partly formed exactly after and because RA shattered XETIC's flank), and RA never forgets traitors and turncoats, so I guess that indeed, ASCN/AXE will need all the good luck they can get, soon (tm). Otherwise, props to everyone involved, for trying, and to RA for coming out of it with flying colours. --
Lord Wimbishi Caldari Wolven Elite Guard Ghosts of Retribution	Posted - 2006.08.08 12:57:00 - [35] I have to agree, those I oppose RA politics, I do agree their combat discipline is very good under military leadership. Dealing with them in the past did show a level of veteran status if Mactep and a few other leaders was around. Though I wish to see RA fall due to past dubiousness the last few weeks actions have been in their favor and it is credited only to their warriors flying in those fleets. "Protecting the Ignorant from the immoral scum of the galaxy"
Major Tarsis Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 13:01:00 - [36] Originally by: Therem Harth Originally by: Bluestealth Wait a sec, when did ASCN come in? Guess I havent been forum whoring as much as Munchy. GL to all. ASCN decided to backstab another alliance, not that it's big news or something, they didn't even have to search for a credible pretext this time (Scorpion-class battleships or lonely hauler losses not being all that rare today). However, RA was there LONG before ASCN (ASCN was partly formed exactly after and because RA shattered XETIC's flank), and RA never forgets traitors and turncoats, so I guess that indeed, ASCN/AXE will need all the good luck they can get, soon (tm). Otherwise, props to everyone involved, for trying, and to RA for coming out of it with flying colours. Can you explain when this occurred I missed this part of Eve History I must have been busy, in Shinra at the time, shooting XETIC station and fighting the XETIC fleets? MT
Gariuys Evil Strangers Inc.	Posted - 2006.08.08 13:06:00 - [37] Really don't care about the smack etc. Just wanted to make a note that from my POV, it looks like RA are doing a damn good job at defending. Nice going.
Plutoinum German Cyberdome Corp Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.08 15:08:00 - [38] Just to add: Local count was around 290 during the pos engagement on day 3, because people were send out of the system (287 on my screenie). I read already alts talking about 600 people in c-j, which is just BS.
Rover Vitesse Gallente Crisis Corp Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.08 15:18:00 - [39] Originally by: munchy Edited by: munchy on 08/08/2006 09:57:01 Originally by: HatePeace LoveWar CCP fix the game b4 encouraging such warefare please. This game cannot support these numbers engaging and its really p1ssing a lot of players off. Taking nothing away from RA, gg and well done for fighting. everyone else seems to be able to carry on the game with large scale fleets etc. you should try engaging RA with some smaller blobs maybe? instead of the 400 man blobs you usually seem to use to take a system edit - spelling Capital ships need support. RA want to shoot capital ships. Capitals+Support+Defenders+drones and fighters= LAG. What can you not understand about this? We even put the second level of support outside the system. It's not a case of wanting to "outblob" them, it's a case of being able to defend your capital ship fleet. We're not taking about a stand-up slap-down gatefight. We're talking about trying to shoot down death star POS with lots of capitals, and defend those capitals at the same time. Rovers Chronicles
Dawn Princess The Scope	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:28:00 - [40] Originally by: Therem Harth ASCN decided to backstab another alliance... How exactly do you backstab someone that you have never been friendly towards?
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:39:00 - [41] Edited by: Therem Harth on 08/08/2006 16:40:34 Originally by: Dawn Princess Originally by: Therem Harth ASCN decided to backstab another alliance... How exactly do you backstab someone that you have never been friendly towards? You pass a stranger almost every day on the streets of your home town. You are both armed, but politely ignore each other. Then one day you see that same stranger beating off some thugs, pass him a few steps and then stick your knife in his ribs. Or, well, you try to. EDIT: due to e-o forums auth bugs --
Grimpak Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:42:00 - [42] Originally by: Therem Harth Edited by: Therem Harth on 08/08/2006 16:40:34 Originally by: Dawn Princess Originally by: Therem Harth ASCN decided to backstab another alliance... How exactly do you backstab someone that you have never been friendly towards? You pass a stranger almost every day on the streets of your home town. You are both armed, but politely ignore each other. Then one day you see that same stranger beating off some thugs, pass him a few steps and then stick your knife in his ribs. Or, well, you try to. EDIT: due to e-o forums auth bugs RA were always negative to us ------- Originally by: Abdalion Originally by: Jebidus Skari What, in EVE, is a Tyrant? Me. Especially when it comes to troll threads.
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:45:00 - [43] Originally by: Major Tarsis Can you explain when this occurred I missed this part of Eve History I must have been busy, in Shinra at the time, shooting XETIC station and fighting the XETIC fleets? RA haven't been hostile to Shinra all the time either, as you should well know, and not even to [5] per se, until a quarrel over refining taxes broke out. Anyway, RA played major role in assault on Wicked Creek temporarily hed by XETIC back then (Fuzzy Kittens anyone?), and then spearheaded demolition of whatever weak defenses Tenerifis had. I can't exactly say whether RA forces played large role in the Immensea attacks at the time, as I seem to have forgotten. Maybe someone from E-R/Black Lance/former MAZA pilots remembers. --
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:51:00 - [44] Originally by: Grimpak RA were always negative to us I do not profess to intimate knowledge of internal ASCN processes related to standings, and so I won't argue otherwise, however I can clearly distinguish between "has slightly negative standings" and "has fleets sent to attack territory". I can also, with standard personal disclaimers, say that the difference between acting on a technical (not to mention even technically false) pretext and acting in earnest (defense or offense) is rather obvious to see. --
Grimpak Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 16:55:00 - [45] Originally by: Therem Harth Originally by: Grimpak RA were always negative to us I do not profess to intimate knowledge of internal ASCN processes related to standings, and so I won't argue otherwise, however I can clearly distinguish between "has slightly negative standings" and "has fleets sent to attack territory". I can also, with standard personal disclaimers, say that the difference between acting on a technical (not to mention even technically false) pretext and acting in earnest (defense or offense) is rather obvious to see. they did had sent some small fleets and stuffs to southeast feythabolis prior to our incursion into their grounds. ------- Originally by: Abdalion Originally by: Jebidus Skari What, in EVE, is a Tyrant? Me. Especially when it comes to troll threads.
nync UA Industry Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 17:58:00 - [46] Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Therem Harth Originally by: Grimpak RA were always negative to us I do not profess to intimate knowledge of internal ASCN processes related to standings, and so I won't argue otherwise, however I can clearly distinguish between "has slightly negative standings" and "has fleets sent to attack territory". I can also, with standard personal disclaimers, say that the difference between acting on a technical (not to mention even technically false) pretext and acting in earnest (defense or offense) is rather obvious to see. they did had sent some small fleets and stuffs to southeast feythabolis prior to our incursion into their grounds. Lie.
Papa Digger REUNI0N Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 18:22:00 - [47] Coalition invide to CJ Don't be so serious, guys. It's just a game. ---- CEO.
Farscape Hw Solidline Enterprise	Posted - 2006.08.08 18:22:00 - [48] Originally by: ArcheryTXS Originally by: Farscape Hw these threads are very interresting and i like them plz dont lock Yo , where r u been ? :) did not see u much around. ---------------------- And wnen u planning to come back , dear Coalition ? ;-) i went to syndicate and found bob have destroyed my killing grounds(goons are gone). now im back in venal being borred and getting sec back up.
Malachon Draco eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 18:48:00 - [49] Originally by: nync Lie. Check ASCN killboards. Look for great mogul, and see where he lost his vagabond about a month ago. Small RA incursion, 1 carrier, about 5 or 6 pilots for about a week. We got a casus belli. Not that we needed one to help our allies in LV I guess.
Xianthar Sha Kharn Corp Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 18:49:00 - [50] Originally by: Therem Harth Originally by: Grimpak RA were always negative to us I do not profess to intimate knowledge of internal ASCN processes related to standings, and so I won't argue otherwise, however I can clearly distinguish between "has slightly negative standings" and "has fleets sent to attack territory". I can also, with standard personal disclaimers, say that the difference between acting on a technical (not to mention even technically false) pretext and acting in earnest (defense or offense) is rather obvious to see. your problably one of the same people that complains everytime we NAP someone. if we attack someone, you forum *** if we nap someone, you forum *** i'm confused, what exactly is it you want? not that it will in any way change what we do, i'm just curious. -xian
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 18:57:00 - [51] Originally by: Grimpak they did had sent some small fleets and stuffs to southeast feythabolis prior to our incursion into their grounds. I am sorry, but intelligence available to me, correlated to RA killboard (ASCN killboards do not allow easy back-in-time navigation for specified adversarial entity, I have had an ASCN CEO stating directly to me once that tracking losses is not a priority, and I have never heard of incidents of RA pilots missing an opportunity to report kills, even solo ones) doesn't indicate anything of the sort. Quite to the contrary, I see a lot of kills against RA in the HED pipe. Yes, RAT uses the same killboard. No, RAT are not RA alts. For the sake of shortening possible further moves to defend your pretext, I will also say that RA is not directly responsible for any actions of "RA-friendly" corporations, which, perhaps, could have ran smallish raids into Feythabolis (to call them fleets would be a massive exaggeration). However, even if they were in control, to my knowledge there was no approaches or protests or requests or even threats to reign in such corporations made by ASCN/AXE. It would also appear that RA fleet command is unaware of any organized fleet activity by the alliance as well. --
Malachon Draco eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.08 19:07:00 - [52] Originally by: Therem Harth Originally by: Grimpak they did had sent some small fleets and stuffs to southeast feythabolis prior to our incursion into their grounds. I am sorry, but intelligence available to me Obvious your intelligence here is too limited. In fact it is plain wrong. Quote: It would also appear that RA fleet command is unaware of any organized fleet activity by the alliance as well. RA fleet command should keep closer tabs on its carriers then. A group of about 5 RA including a carrier intruded upon ASCN territory about a month ago. Like I wrote before, check our KB for Great Mogul and see when he lost his vaga to ASCN and where. Don't come blabbering and complaining when you don't know the facts TYVM.
Dirty Knave Gallente Damage Unlimited Inc Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.08 19:15:00 - [53] Edited by: Dirty Knave on 08/08/2006 19:20:35 All in all it was great fun. Ra did a great job in defending their last system. But like said before its much easier to defend your only system than to attack the enemies last system. I almost made it the 3 days w/o losing a ship untill the last engagement of the 3rd day I somehow got 6 carriers on me and died in about 15 sec. I warped to the POS and bounced right off the bubble for some stupid reason. Othwerwise I would still have my MegaT. As much as I hate you RA guys it was a GF. Just I ask 1 thing... please stop braging about all your CAP Ship kills when you never showed your own the whole siege except cynoing them in and out of the stn. You just sat your carriers at 1 of your 10 or so Large Battle POS and had your minions send drones at BS like me :(. So plz stop braging about CAP ship kills if you wont even show yours on the battle field. thanks and see you guys around... i'm sure I will
Plutoinum German Cyberdome Corp Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.08 19:29:00 - [54] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ Don't be so serious, guys. It's just a game. Rofl. Ok that was funny.
Ka Ten Aliastra	Posted - 2006.08.08 19:49:00 - [55] ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. ------------------- Killing in Omist =)
Dao 2 The Scope	Posted - 2006.08.08 20:02:00 - [56] not to mention RA putting up a pos in ASCN space and run a complex in ASCN space as well... ------------------------------------------------ NEWLY ADDED ON 1/19 (though applies to all posts before ;p) the usual "I don't represent my corp or alliance" and stuffs like that Also the gal
Xade	Posted - 2006.08.08 20:42:00 - [57] From what i heard some coalition Dread losses have been petitioned because the characters CTD'd when the capital fleet jumped to C-J and when they logged back in they found themselves in pods. This from what i had been told had happened to a carrier who also logged off at a coalition pos the day before. current game machanics make ships warp off and disapear but somehow RA have found a way to get around this and i was wondering if RA would care to share how they managed these kills ? Oh and by the way these ships had NO Agression timer afterall they just jumped into the system and ctd'd and they don't warp away till their is no aggression timer so explain ??
Kha1n Caldari Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.08 21:06:00 - [58] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ HAHAHAHAHA
Mariko San Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2006.08.08 21:45:00 - [59] Edited by: Mariko San on 08/08/2006 21:46:23 Originally by: Ka Ten ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. Why do you (RA) change all system names on your killboard to "classified" - why not just leave them as they are? It stops people cross posting them that want to try to keep KBs accurate.
Stedanko No Crying In Space	Posted - 2006.08.08 22:07:00 - [60] Originally by: Mariko San Why do you (RA) change all system names on your killboard to "classified" - why not just leave them as they are? It stops people cross posting them that want to try to keep KBs accurate. Wait a day or 2.
munchy Alcatraz Inc. Tactical Narcotics Team	Posted - 2006.08.08 23:54:00 - [61] Originally by: Mariko San Edited by: Mariko San on 08/08/2006 21:46:23 Originally by: Ka Ten ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. Why do you (RA) change all system names on your killboard to "classified" - why not just leave them as they are? It stops people cross posting them that want to try to keep KBs accurate. RA's killboard is programmed to not show the system that the killmail took place for 24 hours so their activities are harder to track. very smart IMO --- Originally by: Kaaii (UCC) We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.
Therem Harth DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 01:29:00 - [62] Edited by: Therem Harth on 09/08/2006 01:30:42 Originally by: Malachon Draco RA fleet command should keep closer tabs on its carriers then. A group of about 5 RA including a carrier intruded upon ASCN territory about a month ago. Like I wrote before, check our KB for Great Mogul and see when he lost his vaga to ASCN and where. Don't come blabbering and complaining when you don't know the facts TYVM. Perhaps it doesn't occur to you that not all alliances operate the way ASCN does, and that an RA pilot can have <gasp> his own carrier to use as he seems fit, with a group of friends. Trespassing in your plex - yes. "Incursion" or "small fleet" - give me a break. Casus belli - oh, definitely, see above for the pretext. I also completely accept your explicit admission that the whole real reason for this endeavour was not a group of 6 RA pilots in your mostly unused plex, but a burning desire to help LV in exchange for future favours. My mission in this thread is thus accomplished, thank you very much. EDIT: less smack is good --
Aaron Static Deep Space Consortium Maelstrom Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 04:31:00 - [63] Therem it sounds as though in your fantasy-land, that if a Russian citizen just so happened to be able to afford a tank, and took it with his 6 friends for a joyride through New York, that the USA should not retaliate in any way. bit of a joke imho :P
Trembler Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 07:15:00 - [64] Excuses, excuses. Why all the crying? Oh, I see that Stybbe has moved next door to ASCN. That would explain it. Tissue?
Carl Zeiss Minmatar	Posted - 2006.08.09 07:37:00 - [65] Originally by: Ka Ten ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. LV should celebrate this event:) ------------ Which slot do I use for an exotic dancer?
Mariko San Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2006.08.09 10:09:00 - [66] Originally by: Carl Zeiss Originally by: Ka Ten ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. LV should celebrate this event:) For 2 reasons: 1. it removes an obviously very competent pvper from their midst; and 2. it is going to encourage many ASCN roaming gank squads/bored pvpers to make trips to RA occupied space looking for kills which would otherwise have spent their time in Stain/Catch, making life more difficult for RA. Bit of an own goal by RA in the long run I think if it keeps up such raids.
Mariko San Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2006.08.09 10:12:00 - [67] Originally by: Therem Harth Edited by: Therem Harth on 09/08/2006 01:30:42 Originally by: Malachon Draco RA fleet command should keep closer tabs on its carriers then. A group of about 5 RA including a carrier intruded upon ASCN territory about a month ago. Like I wrote before, check our KB for Great Mogul and see when he lost his vaga to ASCN and where. Don't come blabbering and complaining when you don't know the facts TYVM. Perhaps it doesn't occur to you that not all alliances operate the way ASCN does, and that an RA pilot can have <gasp> his own carrier to use as he seems fit, with a group of friends. Trespassing in your plex - yes. "Incursion" or "small fleet" - give me a break. Casus belli - oh, definitely, see above for the pretext. I also completely accept your explicit admission that the whole real reason for this endeavour was not a group of 6 RA pilots in your mostly unused plex, but a burning desire to help LV in exchange for future favours. My mission in this thread is thus accomplished, thank you very much. EDIT: less smack is good Its hardly a secret, anyone with access to ASCN forums (and who doesnt these days) could see that a major part of the raison d'etre for the operation was to improve relations and communications between LV and ASCN.
CEO Rockhound Minmatar	Posted - 2006.08.09 10:18:00 - [68] Originally by: Mariko San Originally by: Carl Zeiss Originally by: Ka Ten ASCN: well before this situation i tryed to avoid their space, cos they were not directly involved in RA vs calolition war. Today i've visited them and killed 9 battleships + some smaller stuff. And this is only beginning. to calolition: no blob = no win considering possible development of this conflict - many vets already left calolition, cos of incredibly boring gameplay. i.e. exept RA they napped everyone around. RA are not easy to kill. Thats boring. So, calolition are becoming reincarnation of XETIC. Swarms of carebears providing endless income of easy targets for RA ganksquads. LV should celebrate this event:) For 2 reasons: 1. it removes an obviously very competent pvper from their midst; and 2. it is going to encourage many ASCN roaming gank squads/bored pvpers to make trips to RA occupied space looking for kills which would otherwise have spent their time in Stain/Catch, making life more difficult for RA. Bit of an own goal by RA in the long run I think if it keeps up such raids. What RA territory? Do RA carebear anyplace? if so, I will give you a cookie for theyre location. Norsk Gruvedrift. We will rock you.
Pastora Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 11:20:00 - [69] Originally by: Xade This from what i had been told had happened to a carrier who also logged off at a coalition pos the day before. Wrong and lie! That carrier pilot was still under agression when he logged off. His fighters took care of that. _______________________________________________ If ifs and ands were pots and pans, I would grow mushrooms in my pants.
Mariko San Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2006.08.09 11:23:00 - [70] Originally by: CEO Rockhound What RA territory? Do RA carebear anyplace? if so, I will give you a cookie for theyre location. Why would you limit yourself to targetting mining ops? I am talking about areas where RA are active, such as N-RAEL, C-J and more generally in Insmother and GW. And yes, RA do carebear but if you don't know where it takes place then I am not about to enlighten you.
Papa Digger REUNI0N Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 12:07:00 - [71] Edited by: Papa Digger on 09/08/2006 12:08:08 Originally by: Mariko San Originally by: CEO Rockhound What RA territory? Do RA carebear anyplace? if so, I will give you a cookie for theyre location. Why would you limit yourself to targetting mining ops? I am talking about areas where RA are active, such as N-RAEL, C-J and more generally in Insmother and GW. And yes, RA do carebear but if you don't know where it takes place then I am not about to enlighten you. I think that ASCN already learn, that camping CJ is very boring and veery dangerous ops. If they want to lose more ships, they can come to Insm one more time, but I hope that they will be smarter. ---- CEO.
Mariko San Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2006.08.09 12:13:00 - [72] Originally by: Papa Digger Edited by: Papa Digger on 09/08/2006 12:08:08 Originally by: Mariko San Originally by: CEO Rockhound What RA territory? Do RA carebear anyplace? if so, I will give you a cookie for theyre location. Why would you limit yourself to targetting mining ops? I am talking about areas where RA are active, such as N-RAEL, C-J and more generally in Insmother and GW. And yes, RA do carebear but if you don't know where it takes place then I am not about to enlighten you. I think that ASCN already learn, that camping CJ is very boring and very dangerous ops. If they want to lose more ships, they can come to Insm one more time, but I hope that they will be smarter. The vast majority (90%) of losses suffered were at the POS and a result of lag-related issues, when roaming the system or surrounding systems there was no problem getting kills on RA ships.
Komolov Gallente REUNI0N Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 13:31:00 - [73] Originally by: Beyond Horizon Originally by: Jenny Spitfire RA 4TW. Hi I am so pathetic. Fixed. Don't attack kitty. Hey you, ebil babykillah! --------------------
Pastora Russian SOBR Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 14:28:00 - [74] Originally by: Mariko San Why do you (RA) change all system names on your killboard to "classified" - why not just leave them as they are? It stops people cross posting them that want to try to keep KBs accurate. What accurate boards? _______________________________________________ If ifs and ands were pots and pans, I would grow mushrooms in my pants.
Plutoinum German Cyberdome Corp Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.09 15:08:00 - [75] Edited by: Plutoinum on 09/08/2006 15:10:39 Originally by: Mariko San Why do you (RA) change all system names on your killboard to "classified" - why not just leave them as they are? It stops people cross posting them that want to try to keep KBs accurate. Think most of the alliances classify information on the killboard. You don't want to give another party the whole information. They could use that knowledge against you. So system names and fittings are removed for the public.
Raeff Caldari Millennium E.R.A	Posted - 2006.08.09 15:10:00 - [76] Edited by: Raeff on 09/08/2006 15:12:02 lol this thing still going? ok, well, heres a quick summary for all you guys wondering what happened a) coalition over the last few weeks has had a campaign against RA, and has been trying to capture C-J(RA HQ) b) this last sunday, the coalition, after a few previous unsuccesful smaller attempts, made a larger play for C-J c) after alot of lag, and losing several dreads to CTD(we could talk about exploits but we wont) and game bugs(none lost to actual fleet combat), the decision was made to withdraw for the day d) coalition makes a decision to back off from C-J for a while until something is fixed(lag), or we figure out another way to go about the siege since its impossible to get any help from ccp anymore on major battles like this to help reduce lag e) RA starts its forum campaign declaring victory when they have only been saved by the lag monster for the short term future f) RA starts its "play" for systems such as P7 in cache, and for 1 whole day actually get sov(only lasted 1 downtime cause they when they spammed they got theirs online before we could get more online .. strange thing, but whatever) g) RA takes station when they get sov h) the next day after the goofy sov goes back to normal we take it back and hold it nothing exagerated, nothing made up, believe me if you want or dont, it doesnt make any difference to me .. vacation time for me, buh bye now \o
mOo biatch	Posted - 2006.08.09 15:28:00 - [77] Originally by: Raeff Edited by: Raeff on 09/08/2006 15:12:02 lol this thing still going? ok, well, heres a quick summary for all you guys wondering what happened a) coalition over the last few weeks has had a campaign against RA, and has been trying to capture C-J(RA HQ) b) this last sunday, the coalition, after a few previous unsuccesful smaller attempts, made a larger play for C-J c) after alot of lag, and losing several dreads to CTD(we could talk about exploits but we wont) and game bugs(none lost to actual fleet combat), the decision was made to withdraw for the day d) coalition makes a decision to back off from C-J for a while until something is fixed(lag), or we figure out another way to go about the siege since its impossible to get any help from ccp anymore on major battles like this to help reduce lag e) RA starts its forum campaign declaring victory when they have only been saved by the lag monster for the short term future f) RA starts its "play" for systems such as P7 in cache, and for 1 whole day actually get sov(only lasted 1 downtime cause they when they spammed they got theirs online before we could get more online .. strange thing, but whatever) g) RA takes station when they get sov h) the next day after the goofy sov goes back to normal we take it back and hold it nothing exagerated, nothing made up, believe me if you want or dont, it doesnt make any difference to me .. vacation time for me, buh bye now \o In my book, lag is not a reason for a huge coalition of gigantic alliances to be unable to capture a system defended of 80-90 RA. Everyone lags and the 4-1 odds win is simple.
Joram McRory Caldari eXceed Inc. Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.08.09 15:45:00 - [78] Edited by: Joram McRory on 09/08/2006 15:45:54 Originally by: Therem Harth Perhaps it doesn't occur to you that not all alliances operate the way ASCN does, and that an RA pilot can have <gasp> his own carrier to use as he seems fit, with a group of friends. Trespassing in your plex - yes. "Incursion" or "small fleet" - give me a break. Casus belli - oh, definitely, see above for the pretext. 1. What do we care how other alliances operate. 2. I don't care whether it's 1 ship or 200, If a member of your alliance engages in hostilities in our space then that is plenty enough reason to attack RA 3. Trespassing in our plex - this is just as bad as killing our ships. As everyone with half a brain knows the 10/10 complexes are a fabulous source of income. 4. You can not disassociate your alliance from it's members. just saying "it was a group of friends having fun" is equally applicable to just about any form of PvP in this game. Originally by: Therem Harth I also completely accept your explicit admission that the whole real reason for this endeavour was not a group of 6 RA pilots in your mostly unused plex, but a burning desire to help LV in exchange for future favours. My mission in this thread is thus accomplished, thank you very much. 1. And where did anyone make that "explicit" admission, perhaps you meant "implied"? 2. As far as I know the purpose of this operation was to join our allies in combating a common foe. RA/RAT have been a pain in the arse in the south for a while now, and we don't need any other reason to attack you. 3. Closer relations with LV? Of course that is good, and hopefully a secondary benefit. LV are our allies why would we not want to work closley with them?? 4. Accomplished your mission in this thread?? From where I am standing you just made yourself look a tit. Dredging up XF history (that was over a year ago you realise??) and inventing conspiracy theories.... Joram
Plutoinum German Cyberdome Corp Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2006.08.09 18:44:00 - [79] Edited by: Plutoinum on 09/08/2006 18:47:18 Originally by: mOo biatch In my book, lag is not a reason for a huge coalition of gigantic alliances to be unable to capture a system defended of 80-90 RA. Everyone lags and the 4-1 odds win is simple. Not really, since it isn't a symetrical fight. It's dreads+support vs. POS+defenders in the pos grid. Currently you seem to be doomed lose capitals at a pos, if the pos defender is doing it right, either you lack support and dreads get ganked or you have the support and your capitals die in lag, which makes it extremly expensive to take down a dozen or more large towers, especially because you have to do the same crap once again in the timezone of the defender, when the pos come out of reinforcement. Your '4-1 odds, both have lag, 4 wins' theory doesn't work in pos engagements. People are not fighting an even match at a hostile pos with similar fleets. The composition, objectives and risks for both fleets are different. (And the pos doesn't suffer from lag.)
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.09 18:52:00 - [80] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ MEGA LOL ROFL Don't do such things m8 - I have a weak heart ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Atlus Red Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.09 20:54:00 - [81] oh hehe.. was thinking where to spend my vacations :) ascn space! :D
Nebba Kenezzer Minmatar Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.08.09 21:11:00 - [82] Originally by: Obivan Efa Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ MEGA LOL ROFL Don't do such things m8 - I have a weak heart Post with your main Nebba - The Vocal Majority
Obivan Efa The Machines	Posted - 2006.08.10 05:47:00 - [83] Edited by: Obivan Efa on 10/08/2006 05:47:32 Originally by: Nebba Kenezzer Post with your main Think with ur brain! ____________________________ Die, but perish! - viking's war-cry
Tr4XX Caldari Millennium E.R.A	Posted - 2006.08.10 09:14:00 - [84] I dont normally post in these forums, but i have to ask, munchy: are you really REALLY bored?
Crellion Art of War	Posted - 2006.08.10 19:38:00 - [85] Originally by: mOo biatch Originally by: Raeff Edited by: Raeff on 09/08/2006 15:12:02 lol this thing still going? ok, well, heres a quick summary for all you guys wondering what happened a) coalition over the last few weeks has had a campaign against RA, and has been trying to capture C-J(RA HQ) b) this last sunday, the coalition, after a few previous unsuccesful smaller attempts, made a larger play for C-J c) after alot of lag, and losing several dreads to CTD(we could talk about exploits but we wont) and game bugs(none lost to actual fleet combat), the decision was made to withdraw for the day d) coalition makes a decision to back off from C-J for a while until something is fixed(lag), or we figure out another way to go about the siege since its impossible to get any help from ccp anymore on major battles like this to help reduce lag e) RA starts its forum campaign declaring victory when they have only been saved by the lag monster for the short term future f) RA starts its "play" for systems such as P7 in cache, and for 1 whole day actually get sov(only lasted 1 downtime cause they when they spammed they got theirs online before we could get more online .. strange thing, but whatever) g) RA takes station when they get sov h) the next day after the goofy sov goes back to normal we take it back and hold it nothing exagerated, nothing made up, believe me if you want or dont, it doesnt make any difference to me .. vacation time for me, buh bye now \o In my book, lag is not a reason for a huge coalition of gigantic alliances to be unable to capture a system defended of 80-90 RA. Everyone lags and the 4-1 odds win is simple. POS guns + tackle never lag even when everubody else does. Better post about things you have first hand experience on only or you look silly (I know I have done it a few times )
Crellion Art of War	Posted - 2006.08.10 19:42:00 - [86] Originally by: Obivan Efa Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ MEGA LOL ROFL Don't do such things m8 - I have a weak heart Duuno about latest c-j escapades but from back in June and before LOl thats the most accurate post ever
Kiel Vhrok	Posted - 2006.08.10 20:31:00 - [87] Originally by: Therem Harth You pass a stranger almost every day on the streets of your home town. You are both armed, but politely ignore each other. Then one day you see that same stranger beating off some thugs, pass him a few steps and then stick your knife in his ribs. Or, well, you try to. EDIT: due to e-o forums auth bugs
ParMizaN Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.08.10 22:03:00 - [88] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ Holy lol amighty! sig edited for lack of pink really PINK -eris
Rex666	Posted - 2006.08.13 14:25:00 - [89] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ Don't be so serious, guys. It's just a game. Loved this,excellent!
Puncher BIG Advanced Assault R i s e	Posted - 2006.08.14 05:50:00 - [90] Originally by: Papa Digger Coalition invide to CJ LOL! A new EVE instant classic..! Keep givin' em hell RA, with each new bandwagoner this just becomes more epic. 20:1 odds now roughly? GJ

Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.