| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4285
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 15:51:00 -
[631] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Lucas Kell wrote: They don;t have to fight the CFC, that's a choice they've made. You're suggesting that choice is entirely because we happen to be nearby. Indeed. Open Dotlan! Everything around their station is CFC land. They can't fight anyone else but CFC. Sure, they could move somewhere else, but somebody else already live there. If they move to NPC Fountain, they have to fight CFC. If they move to NPC Delve, they have to fight CFC. If they move Stain, they have to fight N3. If they move Great Wilderlands, they have to fight PL. Anywhere they move they have to fight someone competent who lives there. Their choices are: - deciding which one of the big empires they fight - or they can give up, crawl back to Empire and disband Or they could rent. Or they could move to Provi where it's NRDS.
MoA aren't only fighting because they can't find anywhere safe to rat. Like seriously dude.
Gevlon Goblin wrote:With the new proposal, most land will be abandoned and open for anyone. The nearest able enemy will be 20+ jumps away. Sure, they will form an anti-CFC roam once a week or so, just for the old times sake, but they won't have conflict of interest with the CFC. The CFC will be a bad historic enemy to them, like BoB is to Goons. Old MoA members will tell stories about the glorious days of fighting CFC to new ones, but for new ones CFC will be just another bunch of players 20 jumps away. How do you know they will be 20 jumps away? And there would be even more NPC space they could move into, or they could even take their own sov. You realise that MoA hating CFC isn't because they happen to be nearby, right? It's an RP conflict they've chosen because we are a large enemy to fight. They want to fight people, and they will find people to fight wherever they go. They won;t suddenly start ratting just because people move around null a bit.
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|

Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
154
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 15:57:00 -
[632] - Quote
Regatto wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Ms Forum Alt wrote:My suggestion nerfs or boosts various areas of nullsec dynamically, meaning that your huge alliance, currently sitting on the best content in game suddenly finds itself sitting on space not much better than low sec. How would that not drive conflict? Well it wouldn't really be "conflict". We'd just migrate to whatever section of space is now good and evict whoever is living there. Chances are we'd work out details with N3/PL so we can keep up the current PvP and continue to ensure survival for us both, much like B0TLRD keeps us from nuking each others income streams. So "you"(lets admit SMA is irrelevant in the matter) pretty much admited that you are making this game so boring on purpose :P either way, running around and having to nuke out people would still be more interesting than current stagnation.
SMA holds assets and sovereignty in space. Please let us know when TRI is able follow suit, then we might take your comment on the relevancy of SMA seriously. |

Rahelis
Tris Legomenon
114
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:09:00 -
[633] - Quote
It is a shame that those noobs that broke the game now try to fix it - the jalta pic in mits post really fits into the grander landscape.
All those players should biomass their chars.
EVE needs fresh ideas and devs willing to approach new ways of gaming that provide content.
Not sov null version 2.0
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13414
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:11:00 -
[634] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote: Where are these magical tens of thousands now? Why are they not fighting right now? Or you claim that highsec miners will take the abandoned space and will form deadly small gangs?
They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us.
Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
105
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:23:00 -
[635] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Gevlon Goblin wrote: Where are these magical tens of thousands now? Why are they not fighting right now? Or you claim that highsec miners will take the abandoned space and will form deadly small gangs?
They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us. Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob.
Well, considering such Goon sponsored events as Burn Jita and Hulkageddon, and such Goon sponsored organizations as CODE and Miniluv, and the longstanding desire of Goons to cajole (or even force) players to leave highsec for nullsec, it's quite reasonable that those who oppose that agenda would make their voices heard, and critically analyze the proposed "solutions" for nullsec, with a specific focus on how they buff nullsec rewards, and serve as a relative nerf on highsec income, which will attract more players to nullsec.
It's not "grrr.... Goons," it's just common sense. |

Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
5
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:24:00 -
[636] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:This is simply because MoA does not have the organization, capability or competency to hold assets in space under current system.
Pretty much because every time they try they get blobbed by one unnamed 30k pilots big coalition which goes for any other alliance in this game, neither would any cfc alliance on it's own would be able to hold sov...except gsf probably. But this kind of discussion is off topic.
Im still more interested in idea about sov occupancy..."leaders of nullsec" did make their famous open letter but didn't really say how to implement it. I don't suppose system would belong to anyone who would rat there most right? Eve conquering should be still about shooting stuff, space being unoccupied should only make this somehow easier. Maybe change to how strategic upgrades work would be viable? Technically military/industrial upgrades work on that principal already.
Right now you need to hold system for several days/weeks to be able to instal cyno jammer/beacon etc. Relating this occupancy could make power projection harder since you couldn't have cyno beacons in systems you dont use...but then again I don't see how that can be done.
I still think sov needs to be way more vulnarable, and not only in unoccupied systems. Systems on daily use must be easier to take as well, otherwise invasions/sov wars won't get very encouraged. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13416
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:25:00 -
[637] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:baltec1 wrote:Gevlon Goblin wrote: Where are these magical tens of thousands now? Why are they not fighting right now? Or you claim that highsec miners will take the abandoned space and will form deadly small gangs?
They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us. Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. Well, considering such Goon sponsored events as Burn Jita and Hulkageddon, and such Goon sponsored organizations as CODE and Miniluv, and the longstanding desire of Goons to cajole (or even force) players to leave highsec for nullsec, it's quite reasonable that those who oppose that agenda would make their voices heard, and critically analyze the proposed "solutions" for nullsec, with a specific focus on how they buff nullsec rewards, and serve as a relative nerf on highsec income, which will attract more players to nullsec. It's not "grrr.... Goons," it's just common sense.
What is so bad about null being attractive to come to? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Snot Shot
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
866
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:29:00 -
[638] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Gevlon Goblin wrote: Where are these magical tens of thousands now? Why are they not fighting right now? Or you claim that highsec miners will take the abandoned space and will form deadly small gangs?
They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us. Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. ItGÇÖs pretty common knowledge that if you want a toon in Null Sec you just need to join any of the CFC Alliances as the recruitment requirement is pretty low. So if anyone is "stuck outside of null" then they probably only have one account.
And yeah, thats pretty whacky that the only people kicking up a stink in this thread are non-goonie......who wudah thunk dat.....
Anywhoo......the Null "Back Room" Deal thatGÇÖs being promoted looks like a Trojan horse approach. "Just get it through the door and by the time they stop to really examine what its carrying it will be too late"... . Twitter = @Snot_Shot-á - GÇ£If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything"
evesnotshot.blogspot.com |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4286
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:37:00 -
[639] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Well, considering such Goon sponsored events as Burn Jita and Hulkageddon, and such Goon sponsored organizations as CODE and Miniluv, and the longstanding desire of Goons to cajole (or even force) players to leave highsec for nullsec, it's quite reasonable that those who oppose that agenda would make their voices heard, and critically analyze the proposed "solutions" for nullsec, with a specific focus on how they buff nullsec rewards, and serve as a relative nerf on highsec income, which will attract more players to nullsec.
It's not "grrr.... Goons," it's just common sense. Lets face it though, most of these people are arguing because the idea is backed by goons, not because they disagree with the idea. Half of them probably haven't got a clue what they are disagreeing with. The insane thing is how many times this has been raised as an idea on F&I by the non-null guys and how it's the same crowd now suddenly like "activity based sov? NO WAY GOONS!".
The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
105
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:37:00 -
[640] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
What is so bad about null being attractive to come to?
Nothing per se. Just like there is nothing wrong with highsec, lowsec, or wormholes being attractive. All different types of space should be attractive for folks seeking that type of experience. So people should go to nullsec to be able to participate in player controlled alliances, to control large swaths of space, and for large scale pvp fleet combat. People should go to lowsec for small gang pvp and faction warfare, and some measure of security on gates. People should go to wormholes for the cloak and dagger mechanics, the secrecy, and the chance to be part of a small group to make an impact. And people should go to highsec for relative safety and security, relaxed collaborative PvE, wardecc mechanics, and robust trade hubs.
And that's great. Now the problem is that nullsec has become stagnant and boring. Supercapital fleets sit in drydock, people dock up to avoid fleet fights, and everyone is just looking for turkey shoots. The large powerblocs fail to engage each other, and everyone is kinda bored and depressed.
The problem is that the suggested changes do nothing to fundamentally change that malady. Instead, they just serve to consolidate sov and make farming easier. It's basically bribing people to come to nullsec without making it any more exciting, and that just doesn't make sense.
What is really needed are fundamental changes to get the large powerblocs to meaningfully engage each other in supercapital combat, to actually have some of the major alliances collapse, and to radically shake things up throughout. Stop having a design where the natural progression is towards larger and larger alliances that are too risk averse for the kind of total war that nullsec should be about. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13416
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:42:00 -
[641] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:
The problem is that the suggested changes do nothing to fundamentally change that malady. Instead, they just serve to consolidate sov and make farming easier. It's basically bribing people to come to nullsec without making it any more exciting, and that just doesn't make sense.
These changes are only to deal with the need for massive galaxy spanning empires. There are other fixes needed for the other issues null faces. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Gevlon Goblin
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
305
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:46:00 -
[642] - Quote
baltec1 wrote: They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us.
70% of the CFC losses come from non-sov holders, so owning sov isn't a pre-requisite of fighting. My question is, can you point at an organization that isn't killing CFC now and with this suggestion will start killing CFC? Where are they?
baltec1 wrote:Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. Yeah, it's pretty funny. I mean this proposal is a selfless one, CFC, PL, N3 all gave up their own interests to help the little guys. Yet only the CFC, PL, N3 posters support it, and all the "little guys" hate it. We are a very ungrateful bunch and don't deserve your kindness. Maybe you should teach us a lesson and withdraw your generous suggestion. My blog: greedygoblin.blogspot.com |

Rumbaldi
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
4
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:49:00 -
[643] - Quote
NPC 0.0 in every sov region????... so you can just park up those sub cap fleets in convenient places in every null sec system, so that any force projection change that nerfs range will not really affect anyone, because the ships will already be in NPC 0.0 just waiting for the pilot. |

Speedkermit Damo
GeoCorp. Curatores Veritatis Alliance
310
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:49:00 -
[644] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:
The problem is that the suggested changes do nothing to fundamentally change that malady. Instead, they just serve to consolidate sov and make farming easier. It's basically bribing people to come to nullsec without making it any more exciting, and that just doesn't make sense.
These changes are only to deal with the need for massive galaxy spanning empires. There are other fixes needed for the other issues null faces.
Are you saying that there would be no requirement for the CFC to stay together if you get the sort of sov-system you are after?
Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen. |

Regatto
Euphoria Released Triumvirate.
5
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:54:00 -
[645] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:baltec1 wrote: They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us.
70% of the CFC losses come from non-sov holders, so owning sov isn't a pre-requisite of fighting. My question is, can you point at an organization that isn't killing CFC now and with this suggestion will start killing CFC? Where are they? baltec1 wrote:Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. Yeah, it's pretty funny. I mean this proposal is a selfless one, CFC, PL, N3 all gave up their own interests to help the little guys. Yet only the CFC, PL, N3 posters support it, and all the "little guys" hate it. We are a very ungrateful bunch and don't deserve your kindness. Maybe you should teach us a lesson and withdraw your generous suggestion.
Actually Im pretty sure 70% of CFC losses come from Guristas |

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4286
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:55:00 -
[646] - Quote
By the way, the following idea was posted by someone totally against activity based sov:
Quote:Maybe CCP should change the sov mechanics to something like this:
- All mining towers and stations are NPC operated and indestructible. - The system starts with no sov holder, the system is NPC null and the moon goo belongs to no one, no cyno jammer is present. - In "NPC null" state, the sov-number is calculated as the ratio of ISK destroyed (not looted) in kills by your alliance. If your alliance destroyed 32% of ISK in the system in the last 30 days, you have 32% sov points. - (after 30 days of data available) if your alliance is over 30% and has 10% more than the second highest you become the sov holder. You get the moon goo, you control the station and can erect a cyno jammer. The sov number resets. - If the sov is held by an alliance, the sov number is calculated as "ISK destroyed by owners vs ISK destroyed by everyone else against the owners (not on randoms) in the system in the last 30 days". - (after the 30 days grace period) if the sov number goes below 50%, you lose sov and NPC null state returns.
Any guesses on who? The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|

Toriessian
Helion Production Labs Independent Operators Consortium
299
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:56:00 -
[647] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob.Yeah, it's pretty funny. I mean this proposal is a selfless one, CFC, PL, N3 all gave up their own interests to help the little guys. Yet only the CFC, PL, N3 posters support it, and all the "little guys" hate it. We are a very ungrateful bunch and don't deserve your kindness. Maybe you should teach us a lesson and withdraw your generous suggestion.
As someone else not currently N3/CFC/PL and a "little guy" I'll also say I'm seeing a distinct lack of any better ideas from the non-occupancy based sov side.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13416
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:57:00 -
[648] - Quote
Speedkermit Damo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:
The problem is that the suggested changes do nothing to fundamentally change that malady. Instead, they just serve to consolidate sov and make farming easier. It's basically bribing people to come to nullsec without making it any more exciting, and that just doesn't make sense.
These changes are only to deal with the need for massive galaxy spanning empires. There are other fixes needed for the other issues null faces. Are you saying that there would be no requirement for the CFC to stay together if you get the sort of sov-system you are after?
There would be no pressing need like today, it will not mean we break up though.
The aim of this change is not to smash up the coalitions its to shrink our empire dramatically so that there is room for others to enter null. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Heat-seeking Moisture Missile
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
16
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 16:59:00 -
[649] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:[quote=Speedkermit Damo][quote=baltec1][quote=Veers Belvar]
The aim of this change is not to smash up the coalitions its to shrink our empire dramatically so that there is room for others to enter null.
Yeah I wanna see 500-2500 man alliances thrive in their on sov space.
:content: and fun baby!
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13416
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:03:00 -
[650] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:My question is, can you point at an organization that isn't killing CFC now and with this suggestion will start killing CFC? Where are they?
In NPC null, in lowsec, in WH and in HS.
Gevlon Goblin wrote:Yeah, it's pretty funny. I mean this proposal is a selfless one, CFC, PL, N3 all gave up their own interests to help the little guys. Yet only the CFC, PL, N3 posters support it, and all the "little guys" hate it. We are a very ungrateful bunch and don't deserve your kindness. Maybe you should teach us a lesson and withdraw your generous suggestion.
Its not all the little guys. Its shiptoasters such as yourself who spring up every time the mittani or goons get mentioned and a handful of alliance/corp posters who are still bitter about getting stomped on/kicked out of the CFC. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
776
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:04:00 -
[651] - Quote
Andski wrote:Ocih wrote:Andski wrote:Unless you honestly believe that rules of engagement were the deciding factor in the fact that two coalitions own basically all of nullsec NBSI isn't about the rules of engagement, it's about the rules of peace. NBSI does 'work'. It creates a theater of 0 hostility. It eliminates all option for wide scale threat. It creates blue donuts. Of course that's a double edged sword. We now have a passive null sec and that seems to be the complaint. Sorry, I won't support change in EVE when the people crying for change won't? Change. :tldr You got what you wanted. Now rot in it. Or change. Unlike NRDS which is essentially NBSI with a gigantic red list instead of a short blue list Again, you're wrong and NBSI has nothing to do with the current situation
The NRDS system is a three point system. Blue, Red and Neutral. You continue to neglect the Neutrals.The NBSI system is a fence, nobody is neutral. Blue Donut is not a mechanic. It's a place in time that came about from NBSI game play. It has happened before. In addition, there are aspects of Provi Bloc NRDS I think could be improved upon and refined.
There are other factors to this, factors you haven't mentioned that make an NRDS sector of CFC unlikely. - One, you don't have the credibility to run it. - Two, you could argue if it did take off, you would see more PvE but not PvP. I'm pretty sure the the obvious is at play here though. The only hot spots in EVE right now are in NRDS space. - History also shows the Nerf bat follows the populace and not mechanical balance factors. So introducing more people to Null is going to see the nerf bat make its way out of popular high sec.
By the nature of your solution you are in fact agreeing with me, NBSI is the problem. You don't want me, A Neutral to dock up in your stations. You want CCP to offer NPC stations I can dock up in. I can tell you based on the option to move to Sansha regions now has crossed my mind but I can't create supply lines to get there. I can't create a logistics scenario that lets me live there.
The true difference I think we have is, you seem content with Null populace and are fine with dividing up the Null players in to Blue and not blue. My goal for Null is to see more people in it and to include the true neutral. The people who don't hate you, don't like you, don't care what you do. They make up 70% of the EVE population. |

Alp Khan
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
154
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:05:00 -
[652] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:baltec1 wrote: They are stuck outside of null sov because the current mechanics make it impossible for them to be able to do anything against us.
70% of the CFC losses come from non-sov holders, so owning sov isn't a pre-requisite of fighting. My question is, can you point at an organization that isn't killing CFC now and with this suggestion will start killing CFC? Where are they? baltec1 wrote:Its funny how the only people kicking up a stink in their thread just happen to also be the grr goon mob. Yeah, it's pretty funny. I mean this proposal is a selfless one, CFC, PL, N3 all gave up their own interests to help the little guys. Yet only the CFC, PL, N3 posters support it, and all the "little guys" hate it. We are a very ungrateful bunch and don't deserve your kindness. Maybe you should teach us a lesson and withdraw your generous suggestion.
The point of fixing sovereignty is not conformity for your Grr Goons narrative, nobody is going to hand you out a magic bullet or do your work for you, especially not CCP. You should not expect CCP to change the game according to what you want, just because you personally cannot reach that point in game. Why should CCP personally bail you out?
'Little guys' do not hate it, they are behind this initiative. 90% of null, not just sov empires, have found a common ground, and came up with this. Anyone else objecting are hard to take seriously because of the tinfoil on their heads and their hilarious inability to represent a viable alternative suggestion.
By the way, it's hard to take someone seriously talking about 'fighting' who has never 'fought' in the first place. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
13416
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:14:00 -
[653] - Quote
Ocih wrote:The only hot spots in EVE right now are in NRDS space.
That would be the war currently going on down there, not because of their NBDS policy. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
4011
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:30:00 -
[654] - Quote
well that certainly sounds interesting |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6282
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:38:00 -
[655] - Quote
Gevlon Goblin wrote:With the new proposal, most land will be abandoned and open for anyone. The nearest able enemy will be 20+ jumps away. Sure, they will form an anti-CFC roam once a week or so, just for the old times sake, but they won't have conflict of interest with the CFC. The CFC will be a bad historic enemy to them, like BoB is to Goons. Old MoA members will tell stories about the glorious days of fighting CFC to new ones, but for new ones CFC will be just another bunch of players 20 jumps away.
That's the point of the new proposal, coupled with the fact that they could move in to NPC Deklein. And oh my, 20 jumps is too far for MOA? What a tragedy. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
|

Lucas Kell
Internet Terrorists SpaceMonkey's Alliance
4288
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:45:00 -
[656] - Quote
Ocih wrote:The NRDS system is a three point system. Blue, Red and Neutral. You continue to neglect the Neutrals.The NBSI system is a fence, nobody is neutral. Blue Donut is not a mechanic. It's a place in time that came about from NBSI game play. It has happened before. In addition, there are aspects of Provi Bloc NRDS I think could be improved upon and refined.
There are other factors to this, factors you haven't mentioned that make an NRDS sector of CFC unlikely. - One, you don't have the credibility to run it. - Two, you could argue if it did take off, you would see more PvE but not PvP. I'm pretty sure the the obvious is at play here though. The only hot spots in EVE right now are in NRDS space. - History also shows the Nerf bat follows the populace and not mechanical balance factors. So introducing more people to Null is going to see the nerf bat make its way out of popular high sec.
By the nature of your solution you are in fact agreeing with me, NBSI is the problem. You don't want me, A Neutral to dock up in your stations. You want CCP to offer NPC stations I can dock up in. I can tell you based on the option to move to Sansha regions now has crossed my mind but I can't create supply lines to get there. I can't create a logistics scenario that lets me live there.
The true difference I think we have is, you seem content with Null populace and are fine with dividing up the Null players in to Blue and not blue. My goal for Null is to see more people in it and to include the true neutral. The people who don't hate you, don't like you, don't care what you do. They make up 70% of the EVE population. I'm pretty sure if we were NRDS, everyone would just be red or blue.
And anyway, the problem is that sov mechanics favour enormous groups by their very nature, so creating super coalitions is simply the best way to efficiently hold space. NRDS wouldn't change who owns the space, it would just be allowing free renting. It may work for proviblock since they life in space so terrible that nearly nobody wants it, but it really wouldn't work with serious null alliances. The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog. Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list. Chrysus Industries - Savings made simple!
|

Bhuda Slash
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
1
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:46:00 -
[657] - Quote
I endorse this post.
No animals were harmed during this post.
May contain traces of nuts, palm oil and coffee harvested in the 3rd world using Amarr slaves.
Names of the slaves have been changed to protect their masters. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids Somethin Awfull Forums
776
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:50:00 -
[658] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Ocih wrote:The only hot spots in EVE right now are in NRDS space. That would be the war currently going on down there, not because of their NBDS policy.
Provi Bloc opposition is an evolved group who decided it was 'corrupt' by being in that space. They seeded their own pew pew just by being NRDS. Being seen as a manageable target plays in to it as well but in any CFC pilot project with NRDS space, that can be in the benefit of CFC. Most neutrals won't see CFC as a valid target to oppose because they are seen as too strong to beat. They might go there to get a piece of you but they won't bite off more than they can chew, like what happens in Provi a lot. |

Toriessian
Helion Production Labs Independent Operators Consortium
301
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 17:56:00 -
[659] - Quote
So from a "little guy" in support of the idea:
1) I love the idea of more NPC null. We're a little band of merry BLOPSers but hey its a living. As someone who does the logistics for these fleets and has a very good network of cyno alts staged around, its a giant PITA to get to some places in null. Yes I CAN get to Tenal and the upper left hand corner of Deklein on dotlan.... that doesn't make it practical. A little NPC space fixes this.
2) If all this accomplishes is that N3/PL/CFC can't rent the SW corner of the map in a practical fashion, we've made room for another big block at least. Thats progress and buys CCP some time to fix stuff to get MORE players in the game. Then we can look at making them some more room.
3) We don't know the mechanics of the force projection nerf or the mechanics of the sov system. The nerf to force projection may make it impractical to move your slowcat/boot fleet too far from home. Those sudden sov drops can suck after all...
|

Gevlon Goblin
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
305
|
Posted - 2014.09.30 18:09:00 -
[660] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:That's the point of the new proposal, coupled with the fact that they could move in to NPC Deklein. And oh my, 20 jumps is too far for MOA? What a tragedy. No, it's not far geographically. But it's very far politically. I mean - the Goons will be no threat to them, fighting for "freedom and independence" will be silly as the last Goon they've seen in Pure Blind was a lost noob in a Rifter 3 last month. - Goons won't have anything MoA want or reasonably could take either. Sure they'd still have Deklein Sov, but PB sov is just as good and under occupancy Sov mechanics they are struggling to keep the indexes of one PB constellation up. - The corp of Arthasdkl+¦l recently left WoW for EVE because he heard they have open world housing and there are lot of free "land spots" in Pure Blind. They provide much easier "fights" than the Nyx-ratter Goons.
So there would be absolutely no reason to shoot Goons besides "Grr Goons". And "Grr Goons" is only interesting while Goons are relevant. After Goons would be just a small spot on the map, hating them would be rather idiotic, just like when The Mittani makes a hate speech against BoB who were destroyed before I started playing 3 years ago.
The reason of this proposal is to shrink the large coalitions into small spots so people stop bumping into them and killing them. 3.3T/month was probably too much.
Anyway, I'm completely sure that this suggestion serves no one but the signatories. Which is kind of obvious, see Malcanis law. My blog: greedygoblin.blogspot.com |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 32 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |