Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9977
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:24:00 -
[121] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote: Look at the underlined. Look at how it's an attack on real people.
It's not an attack. That's a statement of fact, anyone who thinks that videogame actions justify real life threats probably has sediment between their chin and their hair.
Nor is it an attack on "real people". I am characterizing them entirely by their expressed beliefs, and by their actions taken in a videogame. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

Charax Bouclier
Silvershield Universal
133
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:37:00 -
[122] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Mr Epeen wrote: Look at the underlined. Look at how it's an attack on real people.
It's not an attack. That's a statement of fact, anyone who thinks that videogame actions justify real life threats probably has sediment between their chin and their hair. Nor is it an attack on "real people". I am characterizing them entirely by their expressed beliefs, and by their actions taken in a videogame.
"Carebears" has a fairly defined group of players. When you attach "scum" and "dirt-for-brains" around it, you're watering down your point (which was a good point, BTW). Ease off the name-calling, and I'm sure our ISD folks will let us continue this very interesting discussion.
Cheers. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
8371
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 19:49:00 -
[123] - Quote
Wolf Incaelum wrote: There are a few ways to make it work. First off, you need to be using the right ship with the right fit. People like to fly around in Talwars and Thrashers for their suicide ganks. Which is fine, but a Catalyst is cheaper. Another thing I've seen a lot of new gankers try is fitting T2 stuff. If you're guaranteed a ship loss, why waste the money on T2 mods? A meta4 fit catalyst (fits can vary a bit) with the right skills and implants can take down a fairly well tanked Hulk before the Concordoken. All together, I usually never spent more than 3.5mil on my Cat fits. The implants can be pricy depending on where you buy them, but you can avoid having to replace implants by warping to a safe spot immediately after the Concordoken, then dock up as soon as is safely possible (I use the term "safe" relatively, of course).
Secondly, when you loot the wreck in your alt, you want to be looking for something specific. For me, it was the strip miners (especially the T2s). Skiffs and Procurers aren't the best targets because they only have one high slot, so unless they have strip miners in their hold (which is unlikely) you're only going to get one strip miner from them. That's assuming the strip miner drops, of course. Then what you do is sell the strip miners BACK to the miners on the market at an elevated price. It's important that you at least sell them in the same region that you ganked them. No point in selling to miners who you aren't ganking. Naturally, the requires you to gank a LOT. Ganking with a pirate corp will help a lot, too. The more people there are ganking strips, the higher demand there will be for strips. The higher the demand for strips, the more you can inflate the price.
Sorry if this isn't the algebraic answer you were looking for, but that's basically how it works. Basically, you're stealing a ~3.6mil (Hek prices) lolly-pop from a toddler and selling it back to them for 4 or 5 mil (or what ever you've managed to elevate the price to). Considering the meta4 Cat only costs a total of ~3.5mil, you're making a decent amount more than you're losing. Even if you only manage to sell one strip miner for the normal price of ~3.6mil, you're still making more than enough to replace your loss. I hope this helps you to understand the profitability of suicide/hisec ganking. It isn't exactly the most lucrative profession (especially when the miners catch on and won't come out to play for a few days), but it gets the job done.
That seems like a whole lot of effort for a few million isk. I'm not sure you can call profit the motivation here, but if the griefing floats your boat then that's another story. |

Angeal MacNova
LankTech
213
|
Posted - 2014.10.02 23:22:00 -
[124] - Quote
As for ganking in general, CCP has an anti-harassment policy. It even states in EvE help "If you need additional help regarding gameplay issues, are being harassed by another player, ...."
Is ganking harassment?
Short answer is no. Ganking is not harassment.
However, griefing is.
Is ganking griefing?
Short answer is maybe.
It depends on the purpose. So if we go back to the OP wrt income number 3 and 4, they should not be included on the list. If you suicide gank others for the satisfaction of pissing them off and/or ruining their game experience by forcing them into a situation they don't want to be in, then you fall into the realm of griefing.
The problem is, how does CCP know your personal intent? They can't (unless you openly admit it on the forum).
I see ganking as a side effect resulting from an inadequate system within hi-sec space. It's the fact that the current system can be gamed to produce a perfectly safe gaming experience if it were not for ganking.
The solution would be that the default npc corp be a fw npc corp. That would certainly have an impact on gankers. They would no longer have to suicide gank. Instead they would be part of the fw npc corp (or even a player corp enlisted in fw) and would roam enemy hi-sec systems in search of WTs.
As for the market impact, the current ganking system in place is not beneficial but rather harmful. It will create a disproportional inflation within the market for the ships and modules involved. Even with inflated prices, this isn't a big deal for the vets with the large incomes but it hurts the new players with small incomes. Especially since often the ship used to gank are T1 fitting to maximize dps. Many of the same ships and modules used by players running L2, L3 missions. Many of the same used by FW players. Many of the same used by those who would run combat sites in hi-sec.
The group it doesn't hurt are the null sec groups since often times the target is a T2 ship, probably fit with T2 modules. This will increase the demand on moon goo which means higher costs in the construction of all T2 ships and modules.
At least if the current ganking system was replaced with a "default npc corp at war" system, we would see the destruction of a wider variety of ships and modules. You spread the inflation effect across a wider market base and each item will see less inflation individually.
Then there is the fact that new players join the game in hi-sec with its current system. They get used to it. It becomes the devil they know. As the saying goes, 'it's better to stick with the devil you know than the devil you don't'. Such a change to hi-sec would be a shock, but that new system will become the known devil to new players.
|

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
659
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:00:00 -
[125] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Charax Bouclier wrote:Income - Cost = Profitability
Wrong equation. That's the industry one. The ganking one is destruction + tears = joy Mr Epeen 
were that true there would be a lot more ganking going on. Last time I was in a mission hub it was just overflowing with people running missions. pretty sure most gankers care about making isk. I'll join the chorus asking CCP, don't take my fancy names away from me! In the name of the Limos, the Malkuth, and the Arbalest, so help me pod - Mara Rinn |

Wolf Incaelum
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 01:46:00 -
[126] - Quote
Renegade Heart wrote:Wolf Incaelum wrote:We actually don't really need pods to drop implants. I've gotten plenty of my victims to buy back their corpses for exactly that purpose. Oh, the sweet, sweet tears. One can only imagine the joy I feel, the beat my heart skips, when a victim actually agrees to buy his own corpse back so that he can get his implants back. Of course, I'm always generous enough to sell the corpse back at a price that is lower than the total cost of the implants.  This is genius. Perhaps we could consider the cost of ganking a pod with no implants a price worth paying for the good ones to be found?
I'm assuming you're referring to the large drop in sec status for popping a pod. It really isn't a bad price to pay at all. Indeed, negative sec status does become a bit of a nuisance. It can be worked around, though. Provided you are fast and accurate enough. If it becomes too bothersome, you can always farm rat tags and turn them in at a CONCORD station. It's a bit of a grind, but it's a good way to pass the time if your targets have become particularly mindful of your presence. When they start hiding from you, disappear into lowsec for a while to collect tags. Turn the tags in for sec status increase, then go back to your hunting grounds. By that time, your targets will be nice and complacent again. Might even have a few new faces eager to meet their demise. :) |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
6194
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 02:35:00 -
[127] - Quote
Chainsaw Plankton wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Charax Bouclier wrote:Income - Cost = Profitability
Wrong equation. That's the industry one. The ganking one is destruction + tears = joy Mr Epeen  were that true there would be a lot more ganking going on. Last time I was in a mission hub it was just overflowing with people running missions. pretty sure most gankers care about making isk.
Well, that's the most clueless thing said in the thread so far.
If gankers were in it for the money, mission hubs are exactly where they'd be plying their craft. But are they going after those juicy, blinged out, multi-billion ISK piggy banks? Of course not.
They're ganking untanked miners and empty haulers. For every decent gank you link, I'll link a hundred that were completely valueless.
It's for the tears, dude. No more. No less. And there's nothing wrong in admitting it. Don't be ashamed. Be proud. It's a perfectly valid game mechanic.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Renegade Heart
Smack My Ship Up
224
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 05:49:00 -
[128] - Quote
Wolf Incaelum wrote:Renegade Heart wrote:Wolf Incaelum wrote:We actually don't really need pods to drop implants. I've gotten plenty of my victims to buy back their corpses for exactly that purpose. Oh, the sweet, sweet tears. One can only imagine the joy I feel, the beat my heart skips, when a victim actually agrees to buy his own corpse back so that he can get his implants back. Of course, I'm always generous enough to sell the corpse back at a price that is lower than the total cost of the implants.  This is genius. Perhaps we could consider the cost of ganking a pod with no implants a price worth paying for the good ones to be found? I'm assuming you're referring to the large drop in sec status for popping a pod. It really isn't a bad price to pay at all. Indeed, negative sec status does become a bit of a nuisance. It can be worked around, though. Provided you are fast and accurate enough. If it becomes too bothersome, you can always farm rat tags and turn them in at a CONCORD station. It's a bit of a grind, but it's a good way to pass the time if your targets have become particularly mindful of your presence. When they start hiding from you, disappear into lowsec for a while to collect tags. Turn the tags in for sec status increase, then go back to your hunting grounds. By that time, your targets will be nice and complacent again. Might even have a few new faces eager to meet their demise. :)
Oh no lol I forgot about sec status. But you can pop pods as an outlaw anyway, even in 1.0 systems 
Yeah I was referring to the cost of the gank thrasher. Bout 1.2 mil lol. |

Barbara Nichole
Cryogenic Consultancy
640
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 06:17:00 -
[129] - Quote
well, you don't. if you aren't having fun the effort is a faulure.. of course, if you have some goal in your ganking you can try to use that as a secondary metric. but you won't last long at it without some entertainment value. -á-á- remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not-á "afk" cloaking-á-
[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG] |

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
304
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 07:21:00 -
[130] - Quote
So this is the basic formula I use to calculate my profitability:
Profit = ( ISK value of Freighter load after op ) - ( ISK value of Freighter load with Gank equipment ) + ( Permit money ) + ( other )
The gank induced rage ( in game, generated by exploding spacehips only ) goes directly into ( other ) which is sometimes the biggest number of the above. It's about channeling the rage ( in game ) of the carebears or local wanabe heroes to gain ISK (no bonus room or even chat interaction needed, pure spaceship violence and some other game mechanics).
I call it space-AIKIDO the Code ALWAYS wins |
|

Wolf Incaelum
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 16:46:00 -
[131] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Chainsaw Plankton wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Charax Bouclier wrote:Income - Cost = Profitability
Wrong equation. That's the industry one. The ganking one is destruction + tears = joy Mr Epeen  were that true there would be a lot more ganking going on. Last time I was in a mission hub it was just overflowing with people running missions. pretty sure most gankers care about making isk. Well, that's the most clueless thing said in the thread so far. If gankers were in it for the money, mission hubs are exactly where they'd be plying their craft. But are they going after those juicy, blinged out, multi-billion ISK piggy banks? Of course not. They're ganking untanked miners and empty haulers. For every decent gank you link, I'll link a hundred that were completely valueless. It's for the tears, dude. No more. No less. And there's nothing wrong in admitting it. Don't be ashamed. Be proud. It's a perfectly valid game mechanic. Mr Epeen 
Not entirely true. A lot of gankers start with suicide ganking because it takes the least time to train for. You can start a new character and have it ready to gank highsec miners in like two days, if even that. The more profitable ninja looting takes a bit longer to train for, and even longer to become proficient at it. You can't really ninja loot with low level skills. Hell, I have Astrometric Acquisition 3, Astrometric Pinpointing 4, Astrometric Rangefiniding 4, and Astrometrics 4, and I still have trouble pinning mission runners. And if you want to gank a freighter, you have to use one of the larger, more expensive ships that take a bit longer/cost a bit more to train for. Unless you want to split the profit 5 - 7 ways with a fleet of dessies.
The more ISK you are trying to get out of a target, the more ISK you will inevitably have to put into killing the target. Granted, there will be exceptions like haulers with a bunch of cargo expanders and little or no tank carrying shinies, but there is still a definite limit to how much you will be able to make off of them compared to freighters. Not to mention that you have to be able to pay for (and be able to replace, as per the golden rule of Eve) a ship for an alt to use to pick up the loot.
There's a fine but very clear line between ganking for profit and just simply griefing. A griefer would go after an empty hauler without hesitation, but just because someone goes after an untanked miner doesn't mean they're just in it for the tears. The tears are just a nice little bonus.
|

Wolf Incaelum
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
23
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 18:54:00 -
[132] - Quote
Renegade Heart wrote:Oh no lol I forgot about sec status. But you can pop pods as an outlaw anyway, even in 1.0 systems  Yeah I was referring to the cost of the gank thrasher. Bout 1.2 mil lol.
Wow. Since when is a Thrasher cheaper than a Catalyst? lol. I've been out of game too long... 
|

Renegade Heart
Smack My Ship Up
230
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 19:42:00 -
[133] - Quote
Wolf Incaelum wrote:Renegade Heart wrote:Oh no lol I forgot about sec status. But you can pop pods as an outlaw anyway, even in 1.0 systems  Yeah I was referring to the cost of the gank thrasher. Bout 1.2 mil lol. Wow. Since when is a Thrasher cheaper than a Catalyst? lol. I've been out of game too long... 
Yeah I didn't meant a gank catalyst for the mining barges, they can be more expensive. Not much still 
Was referring to merely a cheap pod popper. |

Petre en Thielles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 20:09:00 -
[134] - Quote
I have nothing useful to say, I just felt this should be here
Tears, Tears, Tears
|

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10334
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:03:00 -
[135] - Quote
Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, you sissies. Check out the newest and sexiest in New Eden Fashion! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=374461&find=unread
Hi Dave! |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
145
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:19:00 -
[136] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue ..............
So you would gank empty shuttles just because? |

Mag's
the united
17892
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:22:00 -
[137] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. So you would gank empty shuttles just because? I have many times. So what?
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy
1611
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:23:00 -
[138] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:So you would gank empty shuttles just because?
Just because *and* just because sometimes people are silly enough to put all kinds of expensive stuff in a shuttle. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10334
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:29:00 -
[139] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. So you would gank empty shuttles just because? No. I do not do things "just because". I never have and the universe does not work that way anyway. There is not a single being in existence that does things "just because".
"Just because" usually either means that someone does not want to bother telling the reason, does not want to tell the reason or does not know the reason.
Causality......... it's weird, right?
"Out of the blue" means that I engaged "by surprise" or "without them seeing it coming".
I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, you sissies. Check out the newest and sexiest in New Eden Fashion! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=374461&find=unread
Hi Dave! |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
145
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:43:00 -
[140] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. So you would gank empty shuttles just because? No. I do not do things "just because". I never have and the universe does not work that way anyway. There is not a single being in existence that does things "just because". "Just because" usually either means that someone does not want to bother telling the reason, does not want to tell the reason or does not know the reason. Causality......... it's weird, right? "Out of the blue" means that I engaged "by surprise" or "without them seeing it coming".
So what do you get out of popping an empty shuttle? |
|

Paranoid Loyd
2093
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:46:00 -
[141] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:So what do you get out of popping an empty shuttle?
Well for one, the pleasure of knowing it bothers people like you.
"PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |

Petre en Thielles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
57
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:49:00 -
[142] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote: So what do you get out of popping an empty shuttle?
The more people who get ganked doing stupid things, the more they learn and the more challenging it is to fight next time.
It is community service, really. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
9986
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:51:00 -
[143] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote: So what do you get out of popping an empty shuttle?
A chance to pop the pod of the player inside, duh. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs. |

voetius
Quiet Days in Clichy
274
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:52:00 -
[144] - Quote
Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. So you would gank empty shuttles just because? No. I do not do things "just because". I never have and the universe does not work that way anyway. There is not a single being in existence that does things "just because". "Just because" usually either means that someone does not want to bother telling the reason, does not want to tell the reason or does not know the reason. Causality......... it's weird, right? "Out of the blue" means that I engaged "by surprise" or "without them seeing it coming". So what do you get out of popping an empty shuttle?
If it's a Leopard you get a 70mill killmail  |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
6216
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:53:00 -
[145] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Solecist Project wrote:Profitablitiy. It doesn't really matter to me.
What matters is to kill them out of the blue .............. So you would gank empty shuttles just because? I have many times. So what?
Now that's what I'm talking about.
Unapologetic ganking for fun and tears.
No hiding behind excuses. No fancy equations. No profit/lose discussion. Just a simple "saw an opportunity and took advantage of it".
/respect Solecist /respect Mag's
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10336
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 21:56:00 -
[146] - Quote
I do not get anything out of it personally. The answer to your question lies in March 2012, in Hek. It was a means to an end, which I managed to achieve. (I apologise if that's not the proper saying)
If you noticed ... or, actually, even CARED to notice ... ... I do not share the attitude or even gameplay of absolutely most other gankers.
I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked. Check out the newest and sexiest in New Eden Fashion! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=374461&find=unread
Please send Dave Stark a mail and tell him that Sol said Hi! Thanks! |

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
146
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 22:01:00 -
[147] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:I do not get anything out of it personally. The answer to your question lies in March 2012, in Hek. It was a means to an end, which I managed to achieve. (I apologise if that's not the proper saying)
If you noticed ... or, actually, even CARED to notice ... ... I do not share the attitude or even gameplay of absolutely most other gankers.
So tell me about your vision. Do you support Code? |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10336
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 22:10:00 -
[148] - Quote
I would prefer if you did not try to lead the conversation, especially in such a twisted way. That's rather rude and unlike most I do realise that you are doing so.
Nowhere did I imply a "vision" and my post showed no connection to CODE whatsoever, so your thoughtprocess seems rather weird... but I know it's simply manipulative.
Please try again.
I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked. Check out the newest and sexiest in New Eden Fashion! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=374461&find=unread
Please send Dave Stark a mail and tell him that Sol said Hi! Thanks! |

Renegade Heart
Smack My Ship Up
230
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 22:30:00 -
[149] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:No hiding behind excuses.
Having a little bit of creative fun is hiding behind excuses?
|

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
10336
|
Posted - 2014.10.03 22:34:00 -
[150] - Quote
Renegade Heart wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:No hiding behind excuses. Having a little bit of creative fun is hiding behind excuses? Your response to his generalisation is as much of one ... ... and can't really be applied to the everyone either.
There are, absolutely, a lot of people who hide behind excuses.
I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked. Check out the newest and sexiest in New Eden Fashion! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=374461&find=unread Please send Dave Stark a mail and tell him that Sol said Hi! Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |