Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tusker Crazinski
Delta vane Corp. Mordus Angels
13
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 04:48:38 -
[421] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
It does matter as the rupture out damages your rax outside of antimatter on your fit and is firing into your ships resist hole. It has also been shooting at you from further out so it has done damage before you have started to damage it back.
Your rax's engagement envelope is less than 10km with null on paper, optimal is reduced by 40%. The rupture is going to overpower you if it is flown well.
Raxes are normally fit with rails and will easilly out run ruppies, and keep pace with stabbers. and will out damage both with long range weapons vs close range weapons.
the ruppy can barely fit arty, and is slow with no tackle. and the NONE of the stabber hulls can fit arty, while rax, ENIs and Diemost can 5 rails with ease, and can keep pace with matari quick close range counterparts. plus pulse lasers are essentially snipers anyway.
just about all matari ships are quick glass cannons which got completely ****** by so many nerfs it is not even funny.
- PG cant fit arty or nuets......lol utility highs - agility, cant kite or drop angular - they already had a lot of drawbacks -- ****** tank -- less guns -- bad fitting
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 04:49:02 -
[422] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
New fits and tactics? Lol. We push the meta just like small gang and fleets. I make plenty of unique fits and have success at brawling frigs with artillery or large acs under 10km. Unlike you i dont have 10k F1 warriors to force into my fits and then imply im some kind of EVE god. You are so cool.
Solo kills are easy. Fighting an IRC fleet of 90 with 12 is hard. Taking on the entirety of highsec with 30 guys and winning is hard. Taking on MM and the old NC with just one corp of 20 pilots was hard. Yet again you provide us with another myth of the null sec blob has no skill.
Stitch Kaneland wrote: Yep, ignoring the solo pvp aspect still. Most of those hurricanes you quoted were in gangs or gate camps. Which are not relavent scenarios for discussing ac application at falloff, as per OP.
Its entirely relevant. The stats show that the auto cane in in the top tier of BC, or are we to believe that none of the other BC take part in gangs and gate camps?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 04:49:12 -
[423] - Quote
Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest.
-Badman
|

Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
1905
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 04:52:51 -
[424] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:I guess that makes me an EFT warrior as well, and those fits I posted are fits I've used successfully. You know why?
Its called engagement profile, what can I attacked and stand a good chance of killing in a variety of scenarios. Blaster boats are favored in this contest over Auto Cannon boats, extending the falloff of auto cannon boats would give them a slightly larger engagement profile and make them competitive.
That's the whole point here, outside of kiting Minimitar have a very narrow band of ships they can go toe to toe without being seriously outmatched with auto-cannon damage projection being one of their major issues. If they are so bad why are they the most popular weapon on nearly every matari turret ship? I would geuss the same reason any ship with bonuses favors their bonuses weapons. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:04:03 -
[425] - Quote
Tusker Crazinski wrote:[quote=baltec1]
Raxes are normally fit with rails and will easilly out run ruppies, and keep pace with stabbers. and will out damage both with long range weapons vs close range weapons.
the ruppy can barely fit arty, and is slow with no tackle. and the NONE of the stabber hulls can fit arty, while rax, ENIs and Diemost can 5 rails with ease, and can keep pace with matari quick close range counterparts. plus pulse lasers are essentially snipers anyway.
just about all matari ships are quick glass cannons which got completely ****** by so many nerfs it is not even funny.
- PG cant fit arty or nuets......lol utility highs - agility, cant kite or drop angular - they already had a lot of drawbacks -- ****** tank -- less guns -- bad fitting
rax with mwd 2028
stabber mwd 2435
rax will not fit 250mm or 200mm rails with ease, arty is not the only long range weapon that ships struggle to fit, its a trait nearly every turret boat has.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:05:59 -
[426] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest.
So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better?
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:10:25 -
[427] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest. So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better?
They are not.
-Badman
|

FT Diomedes
The Graduates Forged of Fire
774
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:19:47 -
[428] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:I guess that makes me an EFT warrior as well, and those fits I posted are fits I've used successfully. You know why?
Its called engagement profile, what can I attacked and stand a good chance of killing in a variety of scenarios. Blaster boats are favored in this contest over Auto Cannon boats, extending the falloff of auto cannon boats would give them a slightly larger engagement profile and make them competitive.
That's the whole point here, outside of kiting Minimitar have a very narrow band of ships they can go toe to toe without being seriously outmatched with auto-cannon damage projection being one of their major issues. If they are so bad why are they the most popular weapon on nearly every matari turret ship?
Baltec, I am not saying you are wrong about everything in this thread, but this is one of the less intelligent (or most trolling) things you have written. You cannot seriously be questioning why people would fit the weapons that match the hulls' bonuses. The test for when something is broken in Eve should not be "it's so bad you are literally better off fitting another racial weapon on that hull." Perhaps auto cannons get fitted to nearly every Matari turret ship because Matari turret ships have bonuses to projectile weapons? And artillery are hard to fit and kind of a niche weapon?
Like I said, not saying you are wrong about everything, but that statement is just plain unreasonable.
The Greatest Ship Ever. Credit to Shahfluffers.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:22:01 -
[429] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest. So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better? They are not.
According the the KM data they are. About the only cruiser that is doing poorly is the Agouror.Cynables using 425mm autos scored more kills alone than every single phantasm. 220mm vulcan cynables killed twice as many ships as every single orthrus. No other pirate faction cruiser even gets close to matching the cynable and here you are asking for it to be buffed.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:33:18 -
[430] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest. So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better? They are not. According the the KM data they are. About the only cruiser that is doing poorly is the Agouror.Cynables using 425mm autos scored more kills alone than every single phantasm. 220mm vulcan cynables killed twice as many ships as every single orthrus. No other pirate faction cruiser even gets close to matching the cynable and here you are asking for it to be buffed.
Are you actually comparing a logi cruiser to the cynabal ... ?
Orthrus is far better than the cynabal, his only problem is his cost.
Phantasm is not an usual ship because almost nobody give it a try, too many time spent as a **** cruiser.
Then again, most of the ppl get cynabal because of it's past, his actual price and his mobility.
Actually, you can't effectively fly a kitting cynabal, that's a fact, try by yourself if you dont trust us. |
|

Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
104
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:38:11 -
[431] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Because what other f******* choice to Mini pilots have? Arty and no tank? Or should they just disregard ship bonuses entirely? Minimitar don't have resistance bonus' or drone damage bonus', more than half of them are double gun damage bonuses. IE The Rupture, Cane, Tempest. So if they are so bad why are they ALL on par with the other ships out there or better? They are not. According the the KM data they are. About the only cruiser that is doing poorly is the Agouror.Cynables using 425mm autos scored more kills alone than every single phantasm. 220mm vulcan cynables killed twice as many ships as every single orthrus. No other pirate faction cruiser even gets close to matching the cynable and here you are asking for it to be buffed.
Now actually analyze the data. What % are frigate kills? What % are solo vs gang? What % is fit as brawler? What % is flown as a kiter?
Without that information, the data is worthless. You are trying to manipulate the arguement to suit your agenda without providing a clear break down of your numbers. Also havent seen any links to the numbers you're quoting. You are the one posting this info, i would expect pasteing a web address isnt too difficult? |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:47:05 -
[432] - Quote
Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
Are you actually comparing a logi cruiser to the cynabal ... ?
No, Im pointing out a ship that actually is underused.
Daide Vondrichnov wrote: Orthrus is far better than the cynabal, his only problem is his cost.
Price isn't a barrier to an overpowered ship.
Daide Vondrichnov wrote: Phantasm is not an usual ship because almost nobody give it a try, too many time spent as a **** cruiser.
Then again, most of the ppl get cynabal because of it's past, his actual price and his mobility.
Actually, you can't effectively fly a kitting cynabal, that's a fact, try by yourself if you dont trust us.
People don't buy these things for their nostalgic value, they get them because they are effective murder machines. For kitting you only need to reach longpoint range.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:55:14 -
[433] - Quote
You are aware that the Cyna has been around for much longer than many of the other Pirate cruisers right? And that the Phantasm just recently had its bonus' reworked?
Baltec1, your a troll and you've dragged my thread down into this BS. Thanks.
-Badman
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 05:58:06 -
[434] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
Now actually analyze the data. What % are frigate kills? What % are solo vs gang? What % is fit as brawler? What % is flown as a kiter?
Without that information, the data is worthless. You are trying to manipulate the arguement to suit your agenda without providing a clear break down of your numbers. Also havent seen any links to the numbers you're quoting. You are the one posting this info, i would expect pasteing a web address isnt too difficult?
Looking up this data isn't hard, it is all publicly available. Also how am I using this data to suit my agenda? I am comparing the kills in the exact same way with every other ship. For example 9,630 ships were killed by vagabond's while 4,085 were killed by sacrilege's last month.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:01:15 -
[435] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:You are aware that the Cyna has been around for much longer than many of the other Pirate cruisers right? And that the Phantasm just recently had its bonus' reworked?
Baltec1, your a troll and you've dragged my thread down into this BS. Thanks.
The cynabal is just as old as the other pirate faction ships and it is out killing the vigilant too. Giving facts in a thread asking to undo the TE nerfs for autos is not trolling.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:02:39 -
[436] - Quote
Yeah those Orthrus' have been around forever right? They are less than 6 months old. Enough.
-Badman
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:08:43 -
[437] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:You are aware that the Cyna has been around for much longer than many of the other Pirate cruisers right? And that the Phantasm just recently had its bonus' reworked?
Baltec1, your a troll and you've dragged my thread down into this BS. Thanks. The cynabal is just as old as the other pirate faction ships and it is out killing the vigilant too. Giving facts in a thread asking to undo the TE nerfs for autos is not trolling.
Btw cynabal was the go to ship during many years, and was pretty expensive for many players (over 250m).
Vigilant is pretty situational and expensive as hell, there is only few situation were vigilant will overcome a loki web, because of it's range and tank.
baltec1 wrote: No, Im pointing out a ship that actually is underused.
Ofc that the augoror is used, but why the **** are you talking about KB stats of a LOGI ship... It's not supposed to get on KM ... |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:11:56 -
[438] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:Yeah those Orthrus' have been around forever right? They are less than 6 months old. Enough.
The cynable, Vigilant, phantasm, gila and ashimmu are all old ships. Most pirate faction ships are not new.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:17:02 -
[439] - Quote
Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
Btw cynabal was the go to ship during many years, and was pretty expensive for many players (over 250m).
It was the go to ship because it was horribly overpowered. This thread is asking to undo one of the big nerfs that were needed.
Daide Vondrichnov wrote: Ofc that the augoror is used, but why the **** are you talking about KB stats of a LOGI ship... It's not supposed to get on KM ...
People have been saying a/c ships are not popular and dont get used. The agouror is an example of what an underused ship looks like.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:18:53 -
[440] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote: Ofc that the augoror is used, but why the **** are you talking about KB stats of a LOGI ship... It's not supposed to get on KM ...
People have been saying a/c ships are not popular and dont get used. The agouror is an example of what an underused ship looks like.
How do you rank up on killboards ?
By appearing on KILLMAILS !
How are you supposed to appear on killmail while you are LOGI ?
I hope that you are not serious while saying this kind of things... 
Leeching on KMs with drones... meh |
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:28:39 -
[441] - Quote
Daide Vondrichnov wrote:How do you rank up on killboards ? By appearing on KILLMAILS ! How are you supposed to appear on killmail while you are LOGI ? I hope that you are not serious while saying this kind of things... 
The Scythe got 5,247 kills last month, the Exequror 3,750. Logi ships do get killmails, the agouror and osprey don't because they don't see much use.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:32:07 -
[442] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Yeah those Orthrus' have been around forever right? They are less than 6 months old. Enough. The cynable, Vigilant, phantasm, gila and ashimmu are all old ships. Most pirate faction ships are not new, what you said was a lie.
Yeah and you used the one Pirate Cruiser as your example that has not been around. Cynabals with a falloff of 40km and not 35km are not going to break the game Baltec1. You are out of you f****** mind.
-Badman
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:38:22 -
[443] - Quote
Badman Lasermouse wrote:baltec1 wrote:Badman Lasermouse wrote:Yeah those Orthrus' have been around forever right? They are less than 6 months old. Enough. The cynable, Vigilant, phantasm, gila and ashimmu are all old ships. Most pirate faction ships are not new, what you said was a lie. Yeah and you used the one Pirate Cruiser as your example that has not been around. Cynabals with a falloff of 40km and not 35km are not going to break the game Baltec1. You are out of you f****** mind.
I used two examples, three with the vigilant. Even the Gila came nowhere near the cynable.
CCP took 10% off tracking enhancers. You want to inject that back directly into the guns themselves.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:40:33 -
[444] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:How do you rank up on killboards ? By appearing on KILLMAILS ! How are you supposed to appear on killmail while you are LOGI ? I hope that you are not serious while saying this kind of things...  The Scythe got 5,247 kills last month, the Exequror 3,750. Logi ships do get killmails, the agouror and osprey don't because they don't see much use.
Feels like you dont play to this game....
Scythe is used by most of the welp fleets, as is the exequror, augoror is doing a pretty good job as the osprey but ppl dont use it over Guardian / basi as they are mostly looking for cap chain a solid ship.
In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?
baltec1 wrote:
I used two examples, three with the vigilant. Even the Gila came nowhere near the cynable. .
I've already aswered to it earlier. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 06:53:49 -
[445] - Quote
Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?
What part of "it is an example of an underused ship" do you not understand?
baltec1 wrote:
[quote=Daide Vondrichnov]
I've already aswered to it earlier.
Yet people will continue to say blasters overshadow autos.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Badman Lasermouse
Run and Gun Mercenary Corps
45
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:03:09 -
[446] - Quote
Because they do Baltec1. On hulls without a specific falloff bonus, Blasters absolutely overshadow auto-cannons.
-Badman
|

Daide Vondrichnov
SnaiLs aNd FroGs
9
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:03:22 -
[447] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
In NS blob ppl will prefer Scythe Exeq because of rep effectivness over cap chain, is that hard to understand ?
What part of "it is an example of an underused ship" do you not understand? .
Situational ships...
Why using a scimitar over a basilisk ?
Why using guardian over a Oneiros ?
Because they have not the same role.
baltec1 wrote:Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
I've already aswered to it earlier.
Yet people will continue to say blasters overshadow autos.
Vigilant is situational their is only few ways were it will overshadow loki as webber.
-Dread Blap -Gate camp -Webbing a 100mn cruiser -Webbing cap to make them warp fast (lol)
Blaster overshadow AC brawling ship while AC do not worth it as a kitting platform, do you understand thaaaat ? |

Stitch Kaneland
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
104
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:04:26 -
[448] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
It was the go to ship because it was horribly overpowered. This thread is asking to undo one of the big nerfs that were needed.
Actually no. 10-15% buff is not going to undue the TE nerf buff. Remember when you said most minny ships fit TE's in their lows cause they have room? Its because a/c range was balanced around them. CCP nerfed the TE without modifying base a/c stats to prevent completely neutering them. But in typical heavy handed fashion, they are doing to a/c's what they did to heavy missiles, the cane, and the drake. TE's were nerfed 50% across the board, nothing done to base a/c fall-off to compensate (similar to scorch nerf you just saw recently).
I'm not denying they weren't over powered in the past, and that a nerf was due, but CCP over-nerfed it and now its floundering after hybrids were buffed.
Quote:People have been saying a/c ships are not popular and dont get used.
Where? We've been saying from the beginning that a/c fall-off is not in a good spot. The cynabal is not flown solo as often as it used to be (it still see's use in gangs) due to this lack of applied damage at fall-off. Its sad my 200m pirate hull can't apply more than a frigates worth of dps at point range.
But you don't want to actually discuss the topic, just blather on about killboard and market data. Misdirecting, manipulating and otherwise just trying to sabotage the thread. I don't mind if you don't agree, but some of your posts are either blatantly trolling, or just flat out wrong. Like rax vs ruppy comparo, or that you think its difficult for 200mm rails to fit on a rax (its not).
Or my favorite "a/c's are good because they show up on matari turret based ships on the KB"... i mean.. really? That is revolutionary stuff right there, i see why the Goons hold you in such high regard.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:10:31 -
[449] - Quote
Daide Vondrichnov wrote:
Vigilant is situational their is only few ways were it will overshadow loki as webber.
-Dread Blap -Gate camp -Webbing a 100mn cruiser -Webbing cap to make them warp fast (lol)
Blaster overshadow AC brawling ship while AC do not worth it as a kitting platform, do you understand thaaaat ?
So again you're saying that many alliance are using it, but ask to your CFC pilots how they use their cynabals, do they really kite with ? or just rush people like all of the cynabals pilots that i've seen in the last month ...
So, blasters overpower a/c but the vigilant is a situational ship despite being a thorax on steroids...
These arguments make zero sense. We have the evidenmce that shows auto cannon ships are either killing just as many targets as the other ships or better. There is no evidence that shows a/c need to be buffed. Infact, all evidence shows they would be overpowered if you do buff them.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14418
|
Posted - 2015.01.03 07:12:13 -
[450] - Quote
Stitch Kaneland wrote:
Actually no. 10-15% buff is not going to undue the TE nerf buff.
They were nerfed by 10% because auto ships were overpowering everything. So yes, adding 10-15% would indeed undo the nerf that was very much needed.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |