Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Blodhgarm Dethahal
Transcendent Sedition Protean Concept
183
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 17:51:20 -
[61] - Quote
My Rev is going to look so sexy
Now you just need to make a paint job on the Rev like the Sacriledge or Curse so I can have one of both!
-Bl+¦d
http://bloodytravels.blogspot.com/ -á-- My travels through space.
|
Nevada Jack Orlenard
That Escalated Quickly Silent Infinity
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 17:57:39 -
[62] - Quote
Quick Q... will the AT12 prizes finally be awarded. Lots of folks waiting patiently... |
Vesan Terakol
Capsuleer Outfitters Bad Intention
113
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:01:23 -
[63] - Quote
Awesome, awesome, AWESOME! LOTS OF EYE CANDY! Now... i hope those particles in the roid bets are not like out old friends that cause my poor laptop to melt, although i run EVE at 60+ FPS otherwise. |
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:03:38 -
[64] - Quote
Sounds great ... but I hope you pay attention to the performance and resource consumption of all the fancy new rendering pieces or make them optional (e.g. dust in belts).
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Ric Adburr
WiNGSPAN Delivery Services
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:18:49 -
[65] - Quote
It all sounds pretty good, but I've gotta say I don't see why the Incursus needed a remodel. It's always been a fan-favorite as far as I can tell, and there are certainly other ships in much more desperate need of a remodel. Also if you want to change what the Ishkur looks like make it look like the Tristan. There should be a real T2 Tristan now that the Nemesis doesn't use the same hull anymore and the Tristan is the Gallente T1 drone frigate now so it all makes sense. Just as with the command ships, the Assault Frigates for each race could use a different T1 hull shape, and the Stealth Bombers are all different looking now to be easily considered their own hulltypes with no T1 equivalent. I think that would be awesome.
Tipa Riot wrote:Sounds great ... but I hope you pay attention to the performance and resource consumption of all the fancy new rendering pieces or make them optional (e.g. dust in belts). YES. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD THIS. Those nebulas in sleeper sites really cause me a ton of framerate drop but the game plays performance issue-free the rest of the time. There really needs to be more specific graphics controls over those sorts of things so that we can tweak the problem areas without having to butcher graphics quality across the board to solve a single issue. |
Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
195
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:21:01 -
[66] - Quote
Finally, changes to the Rorqual!
Damn, too soon. |
Arronicus
Fusion Enterprises Ltd Brothers of Tangra
1261
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:22:28 -
[67] - Quote
Everything looks amazing, but does this mean the Pos gun buff is pushed back (indefinitely?) |
Kanzero
Highway To Eternity CAStabouts
6
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:24:48 -
[68] - Quote
Well, this looks amazing. The new Physically Based Rendering is phantastic! |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp Vae. Victis.
5988
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:25:32 -
[69] - Quote
Ric Adburr wrote:It all sounds pretty good, but I've gotta say I don't see why the Incursus needed a remodel. It's always been a fan-favorite as far as I can tell, and there are certainly other ships in much more desperate need of a remodel. Also if you want to change what the Ishkur looks like make it look like the Tristan. There should be a real T2 Tristan now that the Nemesis doesn't use the same hull anymore and the Tristan is the Gallente T1 drone frigate now so it all makes sense. Just as with the command ships, the Assault Frigates for each race could use a different T1 hull shape, and the Stealth Bombers are all different looking now to be easily considered their own hulltypes with no T1 equivalent. I think that would be awesome. Tipa Riot wrote:Sounds great ... but I hope you pay attention to the performance and resource consumption of all the fancy new rendering pieces or make them optional (e.g. dust in belts). YES. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD THIS. Those nebulas in sleeper sites really cause me a ton of framerate drop but the game plays performance issue-free the rest of the time. There really needs to be more specific graphics controls over those sorts of things so that we can tweak the problem areas without having to butcher graphics quality across the board to solve a single issue. All of the T2 ships will eventually have "new" hulls based loosely on the T1 version... so I don't think there will be any more "slightly modified from the original" T2 hulls anymore.
I'm pretty happy with that turn of events although obviously there will be some T2 hulls that more closely resemble their T1 origins than others do. I rather like the way the Blackbird hull is being handled, but I also like to occasionally see T2 hulls that pay only passing homage to their ancestors.
View the latest EVE Online developments and War Thunder game play by visiting Ranger 1 Presents.
|
Erin Crawford
343
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:27:46 -
[70] - Quote
Amazing work CCP! Really looking forward to this release; especially liking all the new visuals and art changes from the art department! |
|
Bariolage
Control F9
33
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:28:42 -
[71] - Quote
Rockstars.
So many reasons to appreciate the work done in this release. This new release cadence is the best. |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp Vae. Victis.
5989
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:30:10 -
[72] - Quote
Erin Crawford wrote:Amazing work CCP! Really looking forward to this release; especially liking all the new visuals and art changes from the art department! Those lighting changes are perhaps the thing I have been anticipating the most, and will likely be the best upgrade to the overall look of EVE that we have had yet.
View the latest EVE Online developments and War Thunder game play by visiting Ranger 1 Presents.
|
Noriko Mai
1618
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:33:45 -
[73] - Quote
With this kind of expansions there will be nothing left to fix or add in a year. EVE mutating to it's final form: EVEotron 9000. |
Jon Joringer
Zero-K
148
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:34:07 -
[74] - Quote
I've been quite absent from EVE the past few weeks, but Tech 3 Tactical Destroyers!? What the hell are those?
Looks like a lot of nice content. Pretty impressed, CCP. |
Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
9012
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:34:49 -
[75] - Quote
WTF are you doing CCP.
Every few weeks you hit us will all this new stuff before we can even digest the stuff you just put in. Why? That is my 1st question.
Second question is why is their still money in my bank account? I told you, hurry up and take my money damn it! grrr @ccp. |
Lyron-Baktos
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
466
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:38:16 -
[76] - Quote
If old trial names are still around, does that mean the character is? I have a 6 year old trial character that was never converted. Can I get him back?
How the fuck do you remove a signature?
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
954
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:41:30 -
[77] - Quote
now if only the eagle was worth flying...
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
954
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:42:55 -
[78] - Quote
Noriko Mai wrote:With this kind of expansions there will be nothing left to fix or add in a year. EVE mutating to it's final form: EVEotron 9000.
.. they still have WiS too do.. i want too be able too open that door and then.. ride some horses and duel for lolz
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
877
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:47:52 -
[79] - Quote
that incursus is ******* disgusting. please stop. |
Adrian Dixon
Arbitrary Spaceship Destruction SCUM.
154
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:48:35 -
[80] - Quote
This new update schedule is great. Im loving all these unexpected changes |
|
DaReaper
Net 7
1235
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:49:01 -
[81] - Quote
Lyron-Baktos wrote:If old trial names are still around, does that mean the character is? I have a 6 year old trial character that was never converted. Can I get him back?
yes the account is still there, if you hurry you can activate it before the name is wiped. Otherwise you can make a new char with the old name.
Trails stay to be activated, I did this with one of mine about a year ago, but let it expire as I had no use for a 4th account.. but that might be changing...
OMG Comet Mining idea!!! Comet Mining!
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 18:53:58 -
[82] - Quote
Anonymous Forumposter wrote:Harvey James wrote:can't you take off the spikes on the enyo please!! .. at the very least add them to both sides not just one!!! i hate asymmetrical stuff You're asking for torches and pitch forks with statements like that.
common sense seems too have that effect
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Caiman Graystock
Confederation Navy Research Epsilon Fleet
30
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:05:10 -
[83] - Quote
The most important thing that should happen in the next expansion is an increase in bounty for the infamous criminal 'Zor' who keeps kidnapping that poor damsel. 500k? Puhlease. |
Alstevar Eastern
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:10:06 -
[84] - Quote
Thank you CCP for the Amarr Tech 3 Tactical Destroyer, it's the concept art choice D, the one i liked from the beginning.
Your effective personal standings need to be higher to see the player's signature.
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
955
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:14:42 -
[85] - Quote
Alstevar Eastern wrote:Thank you CCP for the Amarr Tech 3 Tactical Destroyer, it's the concept art choice D, the one i liked from the beginning.
so long as they don't have ridiculous tank like T3 cruisers(T2 resists and high HP) have they could be good ships
Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists
ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic.
Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
|
Ivan Stoner
Old American Syndicate Silent Infinity
1
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:15:10 -
[86] - Quote
Rhea will be a good without one exception. The removing of the clone Insurance.
From my view CCP is removing with that one of the unique features of the game. Till Rhea it was possible to loose everything without 900k SP. After Rhea Eve will get a tiny step more into the direction of Theme Park Online. |
Nanco Zalk
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:15:11 -
[87] - Quote
the new visual effects look like I need a new computer ... lol |
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation Ineluctable.
923
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:18:51 -
[88] - Quote
With regards to the new pirate faction jackets: Why does every pirate faction have the same design? It does not make any sense that the religiously fanatic Blood Raiders use the same design as the militaristic Guristas or the neurosciencistic lunatics of the Sansha Nation. They need to have different designs!
Also: Fix the UI as suggested in the feedback thread. It is horrible and barely usable at the moment. |
Kopfy
39
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:22:25 -
[89] - Quote
I see you're trying to beat Phoebe in excellency. I like it.
...and now I'm going to start a chat client and spam the people there in with smileys. |
Jeremiah Saken
The Fall of Leviathan
105
|
Posted - 2014.11.14 19:24:47 -
[90] - Quote
This is too much for one day, what you doing? A pick how would caldari t3 look like?
Great new model for blackbird! Sharp, lots of antennas. Efficiency not good looking, caldari way
Bacon tastes so much better when it's marinated in vegan tears.-á
_I am the night. I'm Bantam. _
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |