EVE Search - EST/W1N taking on UK outpost?

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

EST/W1N taking on UK outpost?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
MyrmeenT Gallente TOHA Heavy Industries 3rd Front Alliance	Posted - 2006.09.07 20:33:00 - [1] I traveled into 9uy-h this afternoon. I escaped 2 bubblecamps but finally got podded in a third. There were a LOT of EST/W1N guys in 9uy (as i write this the map shows 153 ppl in system). Anyone knows what happening ? Cheers MyrmeenT
Boonaki Caldari Suffoco Noctis Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:00:00 - [2] One of those eve events Fear the Ibis of doom! 113
Tar Kovsky Minmatar Khumatari Holdings Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:01:00 - [3] Edited by: Tar Kovsky on 07/09/2006 21:01:53 EST is attempting to take over sovereignty of 9UY with the help of Finite Horizon, Veto, Ethereal Dawn, Atrocitas, Without Reason and the Coalition of Carebear Killers. As with most such attempts, this involves a combination of POS spamming and POS assaults. [Edit: forgot an alliance]
Bazman Caldari The Establishment Establishment	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:03:00 - [4] OMFG, I'm allied with Boonaki! ----- Sig removed, maximum allowed image dimensions are 400x120 and maximum allowed size is 24,000 bytes. Please contact [email protected] for more info (including a copy of your picture!) -wystler Hi TUXFORD! Blasterboat for tier 3 Gallente battleship please! Make it look cool too. Thanks. I am a
Chode Rizoum Minmatar Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:04:00 - [5] Edited by: Chode Rizoum on 07/09/2006 21:05:47 Originally by: Boonaki One of those eve events what he said
Boonaki Caldari Suffoco Noctis Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:06:00 - [6] Originally by: Bazman OMFG, I'm allied with Boonaki! When I jumped in I was a little worried for about 20 seconds. Wasn't a 100% sure I wasn't going to get shot. Fear the Ibis of doom! 113
RedEye Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.07 21:08:00 - [7] yarr
Butter Dog ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.09.07 22:09:00 - [8] Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days.
Tityana Gallente Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.07 22:23:00 - [9] No poo coco .... im squirming in my task chair with excitement :) ♥My Hero!
Dumus Amarr Veto.	Posted - 2006.09.08 00:06:00 - [10] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. Awww Butterdog I am dissapointed in you ---------------------------
Aeaea XanoTech	Posted - 2006.09.08 02:36:00 - [11] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. Aren't you supposed to be neutral?
Murukan Minmatar The Priory	Posted - 2006.09.08 03:02:00 - [12] Originally by: Aeaea Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. Aren't you supposed to be neutral? ISS always does what suits them and if it backfires they scream nuetrality In rust we trust!!!
methosbhunter Immortalis Silens Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.08 03:14:00 - [13] Edited by: methosbhunter on 08/09/2006 03:17:22 Originally by: Murukan Originally by: Aeaea Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. Aren't you supposed to be neutral? ISS always does what suits them and if it backfires they scream nuetrality I thought the point of interstellar starbase syndicate was to be 100% neutral to everyone and to be 100% unbias about anything that happens in eve between any entity that has no direct reflection on the property of the neutral entity called iss. are you declareing that iss is no longer the neutral entity that it says it is and that is just like the eib scam that all the people that have invested in iss due to the fact that they stand for these reasons have been decieved, in all honesty iss, i would go back to what you where doing and what you say you do and play no role like your supposed to or i wouldnt doubt it if those that respect you for your neutrality start to call you a threat and start to unwind all that you have worked so hard for. and i have 1 good question how does the afairs of whats going on against ursha khan have to do with iss so what if est gets a outpost if they do how does that affect iss directly. i can tell ya it doesnt or should it is another question ? i dont know what to make of iss takeing a side when they are supposed to be neutral. especially sence this isnt a reason to take sides because it aint like all this is a attack on a iss outpost or in a iss soverned system which raises another question.. should it be or am i wrong ? be neutral like your supposed to be mmmkay
shivan Rampage Eternal	Posted - 2006.09.08 03:30:00 - [14] Because ISS value a stable region. By U'K being attacked it can de-stablize the reagion, or possible at least. This in turn, as a side effect could possible have knock repurcussion for ISS in direct and in-direct ways.
Commander Thrawn Fluffy rabbit killer's inc	Posted - 2006.09.08 03:40:00 - [15] Originally by: methosbhunter Edited by: methosbhunter on 08/09/2006 03:17:22 Originally by: Murukan Originally by: Aeaea Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. Aren't you supposed to be neutral? ISS always does what suits them and if it backfires they scream nuetrality I thought the point of interstellar starbase syndicate was to be 100% neutral to everyone and to be 100% unbias about anything that happens in eve between any entity that has no direct reflection on the property of the neutral entity called iss. are you declareing that iss is no longer the neutral entity that it says it is and that is just like the eib scam that all the people that have invested in iss due to the fact that they stand for these reasons have been decieved, in all honesty iss, i would go back to what you where doing and what you say you do and play no role like your supposed to or i wouldnt doubt it if those that respect you for your neutrality start to call you a threat and start to unwind all that you have worked so hard for. and i have 1 good question how does the afairs of whats going on against ursha khan have to do with iss so what if est gets a outpost if they do how does that affect iss directly. i can tell ya it doesnt or should it is another question ? i dont know what to make of iss takeing a side when they are supposed to be neutral. especially sence this isnt a reason to take sides because it aint like all this is a attack on a iss outpost or in a iss soverned system which raises another question.. should it be or am i wrong ? be neutral like your supposed to be mmmkay quite simple. Iss are neutral between alliance wars. meaning alliance that hold territory ie. ascn, d2, v, bob etc. Establishment are pirates and have shows themselves to be hostile to iss when ever the chance happens. example when iss industrial cross assah into g5. UK on the other hand builds an outpost and allows access to its outpost to all friends and allies. much similar to the way iss runs its outpost. Now tell me again, why would iss allow a hostile pirate organization to take control of an outpost in a strategic location in providence? They are neutral to non pirates. if you are a pirate expect to be shot at.
Packtu'sa Caldari Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.09.08 03:49:00 - [16] The attack on 9UY4-H, if successful, would drastically reduce the income that ISS outposts in Providence generate, which in turn reduces the dividend payouts sent to shareholders. Our neutrality exists so that our trading hubs and service outposts can be open to everybody in EVE. However, when it comes to defending these assets and the values that they stand for, we will not simply stand by and watch. Packtu'sa Founder/CEO Nabaal Construction and Industrials Corp
methosbhunter Immortalis Silens Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.08 04:18:00 - [17] Originally by: Packtu'sa The attack on 9UY4-H, if successful, would drastically reduce the income that ISS outposts in Providence generate, which in turn reduces the dividend payouts sent to shareholders. Our neutrality exists so that our trading hubs and service outposts can be open to everybody in EVE. However, when it comes to defending these assets and the values that they stand for, we will not simply stand by and watch. ok you say that but how can you be sure that est wont do the same as u'k and allow all to dock for free and not affect your trade routes what if this has nothing to do with iss and has no plans to affect iss in any way and more then likely will not effect iss in any way and that it is all directed to u'k only what if you are all up in the coolaid and dont even know the flavor of it. ? why not just not worry about something that you cant prove to involve you unless you want to be involved i dont know but your actions are what in the end will decide what happens in the future in peoples eyes .. personally if i was iss i would stay neutral and want to stay neutral and try to stay neutral to not be affected by what is going on. or taint your track record for future events ? .. why declare that this will have a direct effect on iss when it hasnt even be suggested to do so and why say it will destablize the area how can you prove that .. what if est moves in and plays like u'k up to the T you dont know what the plans are why jump to conclusions unless you know. be real here dont make facts that you cant prove to be there dont get involved unless want to be involved when you dont want to be.. make sence i think it does.
RedEye Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.08 04:23:00 - [18] Originally by: Butter Dog Edited by: Butter Dog on 07/09/2006 22:11:17 It was certainly interesting. EST and their allies did not field enough numbers to lock the system down (it has 5 gates after all), which enabled about 50 ISS with several carriers to jump in support of U'K. At this point the dreads went into hiding, and EST and their allies left their gatecamps. There was a roaming sniper group which would appear from time to time, but as I type no dreads are in action and it would seem that U'K and those who would oppose an outpost in the hands of EST have prevented any large POS from being knocked into reinforced. No doubt things will get more interesting over the coming days. we knocked 3 pos into reinforced mode before we went into hiding if i remember correctly.. about the only thing we can do to get an engagement even if it is only frigs and fighters
Jem Gallente angels of darkness LTD Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:25:00 - [19] Originally by: methosbhunter Originally by: Packtu'sa The attack on 9UY4-H, if successful, would drastically reduce the income that ISS outposts in Providence generate, which in turn reduces the dividend payouts sent to shareholders. Our neutrality exists so that our trading hubs and service outposts can be open to everybody in EVE. However, when it comes to defending these assets and the values that they stand for, we will not simply stand by and watch. ok you say that but how can you be sure that est wont do the same as u'k and allow all to dock for free and not affect your trade routes what if this has nothing to do with iss and has no plans to affect iss in any way and more then likely will not effect iss in any way and that it is all directed to u'k only what if you are all up in the coolaid and dont even know the flavor of it. ? why not just not worry about something that you cant prove to involve you unless you want to be involved i dont know but your actions are what in the end will decide what happens in the future in peoples eyes .. personally if i was iss i would stay neutral and want to stay neutral and try to stay neutral to not be affected by what is going on. or taint your track record for future events ? .. why declare that this will have a direct effect on iss when it hasnt even be suggested to do so and why say it will destablize the area how can you prove that .. what if est moves in and plays like u'k up to the T you dont know what the plans are why jump to conclusions unless you know. be real here dont make facts that you cant prove to be there dont get involved unless want to be involved when you dont want to be.. make sence i think it does. Seriously, most of the corps involved have shown they're hostile to ISS long before this and are admitted pirates. It's pretty safe to assume letting them take Unity would be a bad thing to ISS, especially in regards to our own nearby outposts and the traffic to and around them. Just because we are neutral doesn't mean we won't shoot back at and activly work towards stopping those who prey upon our shipping. If EST and allies were planning to move into the area and be all nice and cuddly I'm sure they would have demostrated their peaceful intentions before now. Also, can you please use some minimal punctuation and some spacing in your posts? They're rather hard to read as they are. Thanks
Chode Rizoum Minmatar Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:26:00 - [20] Originally by: Jem Originally by: methosbhunter Originally by: Packtu'sa The attack on 9UY4-H, if successful, would drastically reduce the income that ISS outposts in Providence generate, which in turn reduces the dividend payouts sent to shareholders. Our neutrality exists so that our trading hubs and service outposts can be open to everybody in EVE. However, when it comes to defending these assets and the values that they stand for, we will not simply stand by and watch. ok you say that but how can you be sure that est wont do the same as u'k and allow all to dock for free and not affect your trade routes what if this has nothing to do with iss and has no plans to affect iss in any way and more then likely will not effect iss in any way and that it is all directed to u'k only what if you are all up in the coolaid and dont even know the flavor of it. ? why not just not worry about something that you cant prove to involve you unless you want to be involved i dont know but your actions are what in the end will decide what happens in the future in peoples eyes .. personally if i was iss i would stay neutral and want to stay neutral and try to stay neutral to not be affected by what is going on. or taint your track record for future events ? .. why declare that this will have a direct effect on iss when it hasnt even be suggested to do so and why say it will destablize the area how can you prove that .. what if est moves in and plays like u'k up to the T you dont know what the plans are why jump to conclusions unless you know. be real here dont make facts that you cant prove to be there dont get involved unless want to be involved when you dont want to be.. make sence i think it does. Seriously, most of the corps involved have shown they're hostile to ISS long before this and are admitted pirates. It's pretty safe to assume letting them take Unity would be a bad thing to ISS, especially in regards to our own nearby outposts and the traffic to and around them. Just because we are neutral doesn't mean we won't shoot back at and activly work towards stopping those who prey upon our shipping. If EST and allies were planning to move into the area and be all nice and cuddly I'm sure they would have demostrated their peaceful intentions before now. Also, can you please use some minimal punctuation and some spacing in your posts? They're rather hard to read as they are. Thanks Dont try to chance me man!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:37:00 - [21] Edited by: Seleene on 08/09/2006 05:38:15 Let me see if I understand this: there are people in this thread wondering why ISS got involved and that they violated their 'neutrality'? There are pirates wondering why they are being shot at?? In terms of neutrality, it seems to me that almost every entity attacking the UK outpost could fall, by their own admission, under the definition of pirates. EST can most certainly be categorized in such a way. For entities who hold their fire on no one to complain about a formidable local military force coming in and trying to restore order is quite amusing. Hell, shooting pirates is one of the things the MC does on and off contract to alleviate boredom. ISS doesnÆt need an excuse to shoot pirates; no one does. With the stated goal of taking over Unity Station, it would give EST and friends a solid base from which it would take quite a force to uproot them. I seriously doubt that ISS shareholders want to see is a group of random killers with a solid base of operations just two jumps from one of the ISS stations they hold stock in. ItÆs one thing to run around the area ganking people and flashing off a Mothership. The local militaries of the area deal with it as they can and life goes on. However, claiming ælandÆ is a whole new kind of piracy / pvp. For EST and their current allies to not expect an escalated and unified response, or to cry foul when it arrives to foil their plans, is kinda silly. Granted, not everyone is doing this and some might actually be enjoying the extra bit of challenge ISS just threw into the mix. But to those people who are trying to slam ISS for ætaking out the trash in their neighbors back yardÆ, youÆre not fooling anyone. - Remember Shaelin
methosbhunter Immortalis Silens Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:43:00 - [22] I dont know about everyone else but im begining to find this very very amuzing
Lord Spidey Hmmzor. Muffins of Mayhem	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:43:00 - [23] Edited by: Lord Spidey on 08/09/2006 05:44:06 MoM has no choice but to pledge their support to Finite and The Establishment now in the face of this newest act of anti-neutrality displayed by ISS. 99% of the entire south may be napped with each other but we stand by those who have the courage and wherewithal to usher in change to the region hopefully for the better but either way we by those who know how to have fun without napping all their possible opponents. As of tommorrow MoM will be running an increased amount of gangs into and around 9uY to support our friends in Providence. We look foward to many fun fights and as always we love T-Bone
Seleene Body Count Inc. Mercenary Coalition	Posted - 2006.09.08 05:53:00 - [24] Originally by: methosbhunter I dont know about everyone else but im begining to find this very very amuzing Hell, yeah. Between this and all the CVA stuff last month, Providence and Catch are where all the fun is it seems. - Remember Shaelin
methosbhunter Immortalis Silens Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.08 06:04:00 - [25] well sence we seem to have the support of MoM i wonder who all else will pledge there support lol never know :? but i tell ya what this is damn amuzing and its been months in eve sence i have had fun and you know what im haveing a damn blast between u'k's sence of hummor in local and the forums im just haveing a blast lol.. Cheers The Carebear of CareBears MeTHosBhUNteR :P
Ange1 Gallente The Establishment	Posted - 2006.09.08 06:17:00 - [26] The Establishment has no comment to make at this time. Whether we succeed or not, a statement will most likely be made explaining our actions and intentions later down the road. The Establishment is at your service...
Vandervecken Smith Aerial Boundaries Inc. Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.09.08 06:40:00 - [27] Originally by: Lord Spidey Edited by: Lord Spidey on 08/09/2006 05:44:06 99% of the entire south may be napped with each other but we stand by those who have the courage and wherewithal to usher in change to the region hopefully for the better but either way we by those who know how to have fun without napping all their possible opponents. Hilarious There are four large alliances in the south: ASCN (4900 members), AXE (1400 members), KOS (2100 members) and LV (2600 members), not to mention -V- (1000 members) and CHIMP (500 members), all of whome seem to be fairly friendly with each other. Yet your grand coalition of pirates chooses to attack Ushra'Khan (300 members), a considerably weaker power in the region. It's pretty obvious you're just out for what you can get, can't argue with that, it's all fair in war. But the implication of a higher moral stand in this campaign is laughable. Certainy the idea that you're trying to bust up the south. You're just looking for an excuse to take what you didn't make, let's not pretend it's anything different.
AKULA UrQuan Caldari STK Scientific Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.09.08 06:50:00 - [28] If EST'n'pals get that outpost they won't have it for very long. Anyway, I wish it was possible to just blow up the silly things. That pipe into the south was always a nice sunday drive before that outpost went up. Now the joint is starting to look like Syndicate. Originally by: Wrangler Win ME is more a some sort of virus than a OS..
Chode Rizoum Minmatar Finite Horizon	Posted - 2006.09.08 07:11:00 - [29] Originally by: AKULA UrQuan If EST'n'pals get that outpost they won't have it for very long. Anyway, I wish it was possible to just blow up the silly things. That pipe into the south was always a nice sunday drive before that outpost went up. Now the joint is starting to look like Syndicate. just long enough to mine all the low end ore
methosbhunter Immortalis Silens Atrocitas	Posted - 2006.09.08 07:33:00 - [30] HEY AKULA WAZZUP MAN long time how ya doing its been a few months sence we last spoke m8 whatcha up to lately i see you left catalyst and joined ascendant and i cant help be curious as of why you left but thats a topic for another day whatcha upto man you doing good?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.