Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Joe Risalo
State War Academy Caldari State
144
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 07:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok, so was thinking while jumping around systems.
They have that fancy new button that can be clicked to warp to a gate and automatically jump.
Thought that was a nice feature.
However, I've been wondering the point of auto pilot warping to 15 then approaching the gate....
The reason why I wonder about it is because most ganks on done on the receiving end of the gate while you're trying to warp to the next gate.
So what's the point of warping in to 15? Has anyone figured that out yet?
Think about it.
If CCP allows auto pilot to warp directly to gates, what changes in Eve????
People spend less time auto piloting and more time playing???
Seriously, it doen't effect anything.
Auto piloting through low and null sec will still be dumb....
People will still get ganked while trying to enter warp.....
That's it...Nothing else changes....
So it's a simple question of
What does auto pilot warping to zero have any effect on the game besides players can spend more time playing and less time afk travelling?? |

Nestara Aldent
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 08:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Joe Risalo wrote:Ok, so was thinking while jumping around systems.
They have that fancy new button that can be clicked to warp to a gate and automatically jump.
Thought that was a nice feature.
However, I've been wondering the point of auto pilot warping to 15 then approaching the gate....
The reason why I wonder about it is because most ganks on done on the receiving end of the gate while you're trying to warp to the next gate.
So what's the point of warping in to 15? Has anyone figured that out yet?
Think about it.
If CCP allows auto pilot to warp directly to gates, what changes in Eve????
People spend less time auto piloting and more time playing???
Seriously, it doen't effect anything.
Auto piloting through low and null sec will still be dumb....
People will still get ganked while trying to enter warp.....
That's it...Nothing else changes....
So it's a simple question of
What does auto pilot warping to zero have any effect on the game besides players can spend more time playing and less time afk travelling??
That's very bad idea. You're supposed to play the game, and not the game to play itself. Current system is fine, because autopilot is inefficient, and will make you much easier target for a gank.
In essence you asked for "I win" button. |

Ninevite
Shiva Morsus Mihi
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 08:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
You're in EVE uni so I won't troll on this thread. I used to be in the Uni as well.
Auto-piloting is a very bad practice unless you are travelling only in high-sec and have no wardecs on you.
Get in the habit of warping to 0 on your own. Eventually you will leave the Uni and go to low or null sec, and you will need to be comfortable with warping yourself along very long routes. |

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
65
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 08:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
warp to 15 is intentional and the drawback of afk travelling. Suicideganks are part of that drawback, everything is fine. |

Nestara Aldent
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 08:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ninevite, you need to reread my post. I'm against autopilot warping to zero, and by the way rarely use autopilot even in high sec, and never in low and null. |

Jahso Kuhl
The Companionship Rolling Thunder.
0
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 12:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
once upon a time there were pod pilots who could not warp closer than 15km to any point in space.... soon there were bookmarks made just 15km behind the point where you want to warp to.
since everybody who wanted to travel fast had thousands of bookmarks at their disposal, lag appeared.
to avoid this kind of serverload, CCP gave "Warp to 0" to the people and cleared all those now useless bookmarks. The autopilot was unchanged it still warped to 15km and travelled old school.
after a while this was forgotten ... and someone asked for the autopilot to travel to 0km too.
|

Ninevite
Shiva Morsus Mihi
2
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 14:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nestara Aldent wrote:Ninevite, you need to reread my post. I'm against autopilot warping to zero, and by the way rarely use autopilot even in high sec, and never in low and null.
My bad, my post was intended for the original poster. I read his post then saw your avatar and assumed it was you. D'oh! |

Vizvayu Koga
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 15:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
I'd like having a better autopilot, but I believe the reason they kept it inefficient is to discourage playing AFK. Anyway I'd like to be able to focus on chat or market or anything else and not having to click the "jump" button over and over again on long trips, so it's a +1 for me, I support a better autopilot. There are other ways to avoid or discourage playing AFK.
PS: I don't think ganking has anything to do with the way autopilot works right now. Not logical to depend on a bug/exploit to discourage certain behaviour. |

Nariya Kentaya
Celestial Ascension
82
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 15:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vizvayu Koga wrote:PS: I don't think ganking has anything to do with the way autopilot works right now. Not logical to depend on a bug/exploit to discourage certain behaviour.
so suicide ganking that bestower full of PLEX on its way to jita is an EXPLOIT? WOW, guess everyone cheats then, eh?
serioulsy... pvp != exploit, ya carebear. |

Krios Ahzek
Juvenis Iratus
160
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 16:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
With the new jump command there's no reason for such an autopilot. One click per minute is all they ask of you. I live, I post, I slay. I am content. Alpha Flight --á an open-source initiative for newbies looking for PVP. Join channel ''Alpha Flight'' in game https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=40104 |
|

Vizvayu Koga
20
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 17:31:00 -
[11] - Quote
Krios Ahzek wrote:With the new jump command there's no reason for such an autopilot. One click per minute is all they ask of you.
Freighters are no the only kind of ship that would benefit of a better AP you know...
|

Joe Risalo
State War Academy Caldari State
144
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 17:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
ya'll missed a couple of key points from what I said.
1) auto piloting through low or null will still be dumb
2) most ganks on ships happen on the receiving end of a gate while the ship is aligning to warp to the next gate
With 2 you can basically say that small fast ships can jump through the gate and lock the target on the other side before they're able to hit warp.
Besides, their's not enough high sec ganking to say that it truly effects ganking.
Oh, and to those of you who said "it's to keep players playing" or something similar, well, if I were to get to my destination faster, then I would spend more time playing by running missions or mining.
Seriously though.... With the way high sec is and the way ganking happens and the fact that gate camp ganking is pretty limited in high sec, I would say that this does not change a thing about Eve, but only allows players to spend more time actually playing the game.
In my opinion, travelling is the worst part of the game be it manual, or auto. The less time players have to spend travelling the better. The less time it takes for the game to travel in auto, even better.
It's a part of the game that if changed really has no effect on the game besides less tedium on the players.
That's why I say cut the fat and lets get to the beef. |

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
65
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 18:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
again, AP warp to 10 results not just from devs lazyness, its an intended drawback and is fully balanced. Dont fly afk. |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:04:00 -
[14] - Quote
Robert Caldera wrote:again, AP warp to 10 results not just from devs lazyness, its an intended drawback and is fully balanced. Dont fly afk.
Game has to remain broken so that fail pirates can have kills? It's a basic feature you'd expect from any game that's out of beta. Google autopilot macro. It's in wider usage than ratting/mining macro, because there's overwhelming demand for it. Seriously, you still click to travel those days? Who does that anymore? CCP should get their heads out of the sand. This is implemented, one way or another. |

Emperor Salazar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
207
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:16:00 -
[15] - Quote
Stop.
Hitting.
The.
Enter.
Key.
For.
The.
Sake.
Of.
My.
Eyes.
Thank.
You.
In.
Advance.
Also this idea is bad. Everything needs drawbacks; the drawback of autopilot is that you slowboat to each gate after dropping out of warp. |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:23:00 -
[16] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote:Stop.
Hitting.
The.
Enter.
Key.
For.
The.
Sake.
Of.
My.
Eyes.
Thank.
You.
In.
Advance.
Also this idea is bad. Everything needs drawbacks; the drawback of autopilot is that you slowboat to each gate after dropping out of warp.
There is no drawback for ap macros that everyone and their mother uses. You and OP are the only ones still clicking away... When you attempt to deprive simple basic features in overwhelming demand, it will get implemented, just not by you, and in a way you may not like.
Goose99 wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:again, AP warp to 10 results not just from devs lazyness, its an intended drawback and is fully balanced. Dont fly afk. Game has to remain broken so that fail pirates can have kills?  It's a basic feature you'd expect from any game that's out of beta. Google autopilot macro. It's in wider usage than ratting/mining macro, because there's overwhelming demand for it. Seriously, you still click to travel those days? Who does that anymore? CCP should get their heads out of the sand. This is implemented, one way or another.  |

Emperor Salazar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
207
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:29:00 -
[17] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:There is no drawback for ap macros that everyone and their mother uses. You and OP are the only ones still clicking away... When you attempt to deprive simple basic features in overwhelming demand, it will get implemented, just not by you, and in a way you may not like.  So uh....this is you confessing to using a macro in game then?
Goose99 wrote:Game has to remain broken so that fail pirates can have kills? 
I wouldn't really call these people "fail pirates." More of "opportunists" as they are seizing the opportunity when people autopilot phat lewts like morons.
Quote:This is implemented, one way or another. 
So is macro mining/ratting. I guess they should just write some scripts that we can use in-game since errybody is doing it anyway amirite? |

Joe Risalo
State War Academy Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:37:00 -
[18] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote: I wouldn't really call these people "fail pirates." More of "opportunists" as they are seizing the opportunity when people autopilot phat lewts like morons.
yes, they are fail pirates because they seem to be afraid of pirating in low sec where some skill may actually be involved.
Quote:So is macro mining/ratting. I guess they should just write some scripts that we can use in-game since errybody is doing it anyway amirite?
yes.
hell, at least if it's part of the game CCP can balance around it.
Also, the ships I use when auto piloting are bc's, bs's, and shuttles.
Dont' care if I lose a shuttle... gonna take too much effort for someone to take down my bc or bs before they get concorded.
and any time i'm transporting something in an indy that i expensive, then I will not auto pilot because I wanna be there to activate the tank if someone tries to gank me before I go into warp.
AP jumping to zero changes nothing in Eve except quality of life by allowing players to get where they're going faster so they can actually play the game instead of waisting time jumping around.
Oh, and it's called double space..... It's actually easier on the readers eyes than one big wall of words. |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote:Goose99 wrote:There is no drawback for ap macros that everyone and their mother uses. You and OP are the only ones still clicking away... When you attempt to deprive simple basic features in overwhelming demand, it will get implemented, just not by you, and in a way you may not like.  So uh....this is you confessing to using a macro in game then? Goose99 wrote:Game has to remain broken so that fail pirates can have kills?  I wouldn't really call these people "fail pirates." More of "opportunists" as they are seizing the opportunity when people autopilot phat lewts like morons. Quote:This is implemented, one way or another.  So is macro mining/ratting. I guess they should just write some scripts that we can use in-game since errybody is doing it anyway amirite?
Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. Unlike OP or supporters, I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening. |

Emperor Salazar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
207
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening. 
Confirming I love the taste of sand.
But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros.
Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective? |
|

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:45:00 -
[21] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote:Goose99 wrote:Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.  Confirming I love the taste of sand. But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros. Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective?
Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking... |

Emperor Salazar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
207
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking... 
Hey man, idk about you, but trolling is wrong and I don't partake in that. |

Joe Risalo
State War Academy Caldari State
145
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
Goose99 wrote:Emperor Salazar wrote:Goose99 wrote:Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.  Confirming I love the taste of sand. But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros. Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective? Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking... 
Unfortunately I'm going to have to agree with Sal on this one. Simply because any time I go travelling around I see tons of people in tons of different ships (mostly indy's and freighters) that are in AP.
However, it still doesn't change the fact the I feel that reducing jump range to 0 for auto pilot does nothing to Eve but increase the quality of life, increase the amount of play time and less afk travel, but also just gets things moving a little faster in Eve, and reduces server load cause now auto pilot won't have to factor approaching a gate.(if even not by much) |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
257
|
Posted - 2011.12.01 19:56:00 -
[24] - Quote
Joe Risalo wrote:Goose99 wrote:Emperor Salazar wrote:Goose99 wrote:Not everyone is macro mining/ratting. Ratting in particular requires far more sophisticated bots. And yes, just about everyone uses travel macros, numerous versions widely available for free, since it's so simple to script. I don't tell you what should be, only what is, since you seem to have you head stuck in the sand just like CCP, and has no idea what's happening.  Confirming I love the taste of sand. But really....can you show me where you gathered this great intel from? I would love to know your source of information for knowing that JUST ABOUT EVERYONE uses travel macros. Your argument is literally based 100% on theoretical data. You really think thats....effective? Chat, metagaming, Google? You know, communicate with ppl, make some friends, troll the forums, get the latest news, and you won't be stuck traveling via clicking...  Unfortunately I'm going to have to agree with Sal on this one. Simply because any time I go travelling around I see tons of people in tons of different ships (mostly indy's and freighters) that are in AP. However, it still doesn't change the fact the I feel that reducing jump range to 0 for auto pilot does nothing to Eve but increase the quality of life, increase the amount of play time and less afk travel, but also just gets things moving a little faster in Eve, and reduces server load cause now auto pilot won't have to factor approaching a gate.(if even not by much)
The reason you see them is because they're the ones stuck approaching the gate with freighters. Majority of people just come and go. |

Bearilian
Man Eating Bears
23
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 05:59:00 -
[25] - Quote
I dont really want to join this arguement, but i cant help myself. Its my general experience that, only people who exploit a game mechanic (gankers in this case), tend to argue against a change that would effect their use of it in the game. if auto pilot was reduced to within 0, then contrary to popular beleif i would game more. i would spend more time searching markets and contracts, I would ballance assets and manage my orders. (before you say anything; yes i can multitask, but if travel was uninterrupted, i could accomplish far more).
+1
If this change when through, it would take less than a month for everyone to never complain about it again... (because I think It's true that ganking would only be reduced by a tiny percentage).
Although I would like to add, (forget who I heard this from) but someone suggested introducing an auto pilot skill, or some similar skill that would reduce the distance from the gate. by lvl 5 have it within 0 km. make it extremely sp extensive so it takes a really long time to train. that way you know the person earned it.
 |

Rina Asanari
State War Academy Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 06:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
I think many people already know that I mostly take a stance favouring carebear-y activities.
But this is one of the exceptions.
Combining "Warp to 0" and "Jump" is a nice addition which I gladly use, but people may have noticed that someone may even be a fraction of a second, or maybe up to a second, faster if they still do it by hand. Just because the automatics let the ship decelerate to zero before initiating stargate jump.
I'm fine with that. Less clicking hassle for me and still not as good as if I fly completely manual.
Now comes:
Laziness should not be rewarded. It should be penalized. If you don't watch out and take matters into your own hands, you're fair game. That goes for autopiloting, especially with an expensive ship or during wartimes as same as with maybe warping onto the default warp-in point of an ice belt and simply picking the nearest roid in sight instead of making yourself a less obvious spot. That list goes on and on.
Back to autopiloting:
You're travelling, pure and simple. You're occupied with the process of travelling. An airplane pilot cannot simply switch on autopilot and take a nap somewhere in the rear part of plane as well. As well as you can't simply switch on cruise control and make a coffee in the back of your mobile home, even if the long, straight, empty roads of Canada entice you to do it.
So.... No. |

Nestara Aldent
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 07:50:00 -
[27] - Quote
Oh my God...
Ganking is not an exploit, it's intended game mechanics. Scamming in character or game time code trade would be an exploit, because it's against rules by CCP.
This game isn't at all for you if you don't have tough enough skin for pvp, or if you dislike pvp, but want to mine in a harsh, realistic environment where you will be ganked, it's just a matter of time.
Ganking isn't an exploit! Ganking AFK pilots who autopilot billions to Jita isn't an exploit! |

Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow The Revenant Order
250
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 10:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
No.
Autopilot warping to 15km working as intended.
Consider the following:
In a high traffic system, you are piloting a freighter, and warp to 0 on the gate utilizing autopilot, and multiple ships come out of warp at approximately the same time, thus slowing down from FTL speeds, and strike your freighter, bumping it off the gate, and a crew of gankers just happen to be floating around (say the Sivala/Uedama bottleneck). Suddenly, multiple alphapests, alphapocs unleash their fury on your autopiloting freighter, all because you're too lazy to actually play the game.
In the end, they profit, as we all know even on AP, a jump isn't immediate as there would be the session change of coming out of warp, and the session change of jumping, which would put more strain on servers, thus creating more lag.
So again, no. "War is not measured in terms of who wins or loses, who is right or wrong.-á It is measured in terms of who survives." |

Bearilian
Man Eating Bears
23
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 19:10:00 -
[29] - Quote
I cant help it, I want to point out that most of the people arguing this proposal are completely missing one of the points that the original posts attempted to make really clear. you can say ganking is not an exploit, and you are entirely correct. that shouldnt have been said in the first place. basically what I got of of this thread was that Joe Risalo, tried to make the arguement that changing auto warp to 0 would not have much effect on whether someone gets ganked. practically nobody commented on this. mostly I beleive its cause either you disagree but realize that if you complained then it would make you sound like a lazy wuss ganker, or you agree but are afraid of the change.
Now the real dificulty is figuring out if this is actually awarding laziness in piloting or not. some of you do make good points thats its in place to make someone actually fly their own ship, but that does not mean the system could not be improved. what do you guys think of the idea of adding a skill that would improve your auto piloting? (it doesnt have to reach 0, mabye it could max out at 5km, I'm pretty sure thats what the guy said where i first saw the idea)
personally i restate that I think this change should go through. and strongly believe that every who disagrees with it, would completly forget about it within a month or two of it being implemented. really think about it. does it matter that much to you? you realize that every one would reap the benefit, not just lazy carebears?
I only use auto pilot when i have to go do something, or when my girl needs me, or when Im leaving the house for a while. being ganked while i'm away is a risk i willingly take. if auto pilot warped to zero, i would actually use it while im playing, like i said before. It might help lazy people, but it would also help multitaskers. |

Goose99
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
259
|
Posted - 2011.12.02 20:06:00 -
[30] - Quote
Bearilian wrote:I cant help it, I want to point out that most of the people arguing this proposal are completely missing one of the points that the original posts attempted to make really clear. you can say ganking is not an exploit, and you are entirely correct. that shouldnt have been said in the first place. basically what I got of of this thread was that Joe Risalo, tried to make the arguement that changing auto warp to 0 would not have much effect on whether someone gets ganked. practically nobody commented on this. mostly I beleive its cause either you disagree but realize that if you complained then it would make you sound like a lazy wuss ganker, or you agree but are afraid of the change.
Now the real dificulty is figuring out if this is actually awarding laziness in piloting or not. some of you do make good points thats its in place to make someone actually fly their own ship, but that does not mean the system could not be improved. what do you guys think of the idea of adding a skill that would improve your auto piloting? (it doesnt have to reach 0, mabye it could max out at 5km, I'm pretty sure thats what the guy said where i first saw the idea)
personally i restate that I think this change should go through. and strongly believe that every who disagrees with it, would completly forget about it within a month or two of it being implemented. really think about it. does it matter that much to you? you realize that every one would reap the benefit, not just lazy carebears?
I only use auto pilot when i have to go do something, or when my girl needs me, or when Im leaving the house for a while. being ganked while i'm away is a risk i willingly take. if auto pilot warped to zero, i would actually use it while im playing, like i said before. It might help lazy people, but it would also help multitaskers.
It helps people who refuse to use the ubiquitous ap macro for whatever reason. It won't have much of an effect because this "feature" is an automation for simple repetitive task that's been implemented years ago, just not by CCP. Eve is the only game where autopilot function is intentionally crippled, thus fostering macro usage, users of which often move onto more advanced botting programs, as the omnipresent ap macro, which is often considered mandatory righter after downloading game client by many communities, acts as a gate way to introduce them to botting. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |