Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

MindRanger
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
33
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 18:25:18 -
[91] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:Dear CCP:
Thanks for making the "end game" in this game worthless. Something that takes years and years to train for and tens of billions of isk to obtain and fit is going to be made into a "niche" ship that is rarely taken out and has no offensive means to defend itself.
And don't tell me a 14x skill and tens of billions of isk is not end game, because it is. Stop seeing these ships as the problem, when it is YOUR LACK OF IMAGINATION THAT IS THE PROBLEM. I don't play the game to have an Ishtar as my ultimate goal; I play the game to have the sickest and most powerful ship to be in with the most to lose if I die. And if I die, I'll will lose tens of billions of isk in the hull alone and billions in implants.
SAVE THE SUPER AND BUFF THE TITAN. KEEP EVE EPIC. DON'T HAVE CRUISER HULLS BE THE END GAME. DOWN WITH MAKING EVE CAPTURE THE FLAG. SIC SEMPER TYRANIS = CCP FOZZIE.
Hey, this is not a bad thing. I'm piling all me values and assets into a few supers, logging them off and unsubbing them in some backwater system, keeping only one of my seven accounts active in an Ishtar and spending the savings on hookers and blow.
If you ask me, that is a win win situation. Less time spent in a game, less TiDi and lot more fun out of game ;) |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
10151
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 18:39:11 -
[92] - Quote
What ccp is doing is wrong headed (proving they don't know much about their players, especially in null), but it's not the end of the world. They've done these kinds of 'tone deaf' things before (not talking about super caps, we don't know what they will do yet, I mean the general direciton of the game) and CCP is the kind of company that needs to hit near-rock bottom before they level out and start doing things right again.
It took monocle gate/Incarna to get ccp on the right track with the game the last time, but that was years ago and anyone who is an adult with a job knows that 'institutional memory' doesn't actually exist lol. Eventually, the folly of CCPs choices will catch up with them, their will again be a period of much soul searching (ie layoffs while the big wigs cover ass) and EVE Online will temporarily be set on a good track again... until the next time.
TL;DR, CCP are really cylons (the hot babe kind, not the toaster kind), this has happened before, and it WILL happen again. |

Pax Deltari
R3d Fire
10
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 18:52:23 -
[93] - Quote
Kuga wrote:Sounds like a Mickey Mouse role to me. I think CCP need to consider future roles of supers more carefully.
Delayed local in null sec, now there's a topic. While I'm not entirely against it, I can see a glaring issue - null sec allows force projection (hot dropping), while wormholes do not. This, coupled with the issue that wormholes are more profitable and don't require sov defence will make null sec a far less attractive proposition for living. The issue of force projection (including black ops - really, why would you do this - will another gameplay option be destroyed??) will need to be dealt with before a mechanic like delayed local in null sec will be successful.
People will say "have PvP'ers on hand" but we all know that doesn't work against blops strikes which usually annihilate the target before anyone can respond.
Wormholes require Sov defence... It's just not called sov. |

Eddiie
Hooded Underworld Guys Northern Coalition.
4
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 19:23:40 -
[94] - Quote
Clearly someone got dropped on by supers in CCP and their favourite ship is the Ishtar. 
Incarna mk2 inc pls |

Redlaw Ikaruga
Evolution Northern Coalition.
11
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 22:07:34 -
[95] - Quote
Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
|

MindRanger
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
33
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 22:43:01 -
[96] - Quote
Redlaw Ikaruga wrote:Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
Defacto not only the super accounts, but their support accounts as well. Imagine a supercarrier or titan like an Abrams tank. To keep a single Abrams operational and ready for battle it requires some ~50 people supporting. Obviously not as extreme for a lousy digital supercapital, but the concept is the same. You won't have a need for logistics toons to provide fuel/stront/etc, no more cyno alts, no more scouts, no more wormhole/ratting/incursion/mission -alts to make isk for those big babies and their blingy modules (eh, how much would you want to bling up your Ishtar anyway)
You may see a chain reaction... if it was up to me, I'd rather give supers a new and strategically important purpose, much like every other ship has one. Let them excel in their field just as other category ships do.
Anyway, I'm not too worried about it, nerf or buff either way - it may be a sign from Bob that it's time to spend the next decade doing something else :D |

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
35
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 23:41:37 -
[97] - Quote
MindRanger wrote:Redlaw Ikaruga wrote:Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
Defacto not only the super accounts, but their support accounts as well. Imagine a supercarrier or titan like an Abrams tank. To keep a single Abrams operational and ready for battle it requires some ~50 people supporting. Obviously not as extreme for a lousy digital supercapital, but the concept is the same. You won't have a need for logistics toons to provide fuel/stront/etc, no more cyno alts, no more scouts, no more wormhole/ratting/incursion/mission -alts to make isk for those big babies and their blingy modules (eh, how much would you want to bling up your Ishtar anyway) You may see a chain reaction... if it was up to me, I'd rather give supers a new and strategically important purpose, much like every other ship has one. Let them excel in their field just as other category ships do. Anyway, I'm not too worried about it, nerf or buff either way - it may be a sign from Bob that it's time to spend the next decade doing something else :D
Well said. |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
15457
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 00:39:20 -
[98] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:I thought the AFK cloaking comments would have got more attention...
If local is removed in null, AFK cloakers are going to have to alt-tab into client more often to chatter in local, and I look forward to all of the comments that get posted in local in ratting systems.
Imagine a N3 member sitting in a Goon ratting system, cloaked, and typing the lyrics of Call Me Maybe into chat over and over....
We would probably join in.
Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship
|

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
1836
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 04:09:49 -
[99] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Sabriz Adoudel wrote:I thought the AFK cloaking comments would have got more attention...
If local is removed in null, AFK cloakers are going to have to alt-tab into client more often to chatter in local, and I look forward to all of the comments that get posted in local in ratting systems.
Imagine a N3 member sitting in a Goon ratting system, cloaked, and typing the lyrics of Call Me Maybe into chat over and over.... We would probably join in. yeah, actual goons and actual N3 pilots dont dock up, its N3 renters that dock up and hide under threat of being kicked out if they get ganked, and its ISKmules/mooks who dock up in goon space for fear of ebing amde fun of for ratting in a 3billion isk battleship/carrier that could easily be done in a 200mil isk ship |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage RAZOR Alliance
510
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 07:25:05 -
[100] - Quote
Redlaw Ikaruga wrote:Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
I have to admit I've conspicuously never seen calls for the death of supers coming from NCdot players.
Although on the other hand I do still think they're a detriment to the game in their current incarnation: speaking of which what happens to fighter bombers now?
Veteran and solo/small gang PVP advocate.
|
|

Ren Oren
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
79
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 07:31:55 -
[101] - Quote
Tirion79 wrote:So what do we have so far in this new game they call EVE-ONGRIND.
No winter megawar, gj onthe jump fatique. My first winter in years that I am actually bored to death. Supers.......well lets not mention those. GL pilots who have trained there ballz off and grinded like a mtf, gl taking it up the ass....dry Sov, going to be more a a pain. Titan's where killed a long time ago so aint gonna mention them. Oh yeah......I forgot the fights that do occur.....40 jumps to the fight and 40 back.......really really awesome and not a complete wast off time and fun at all.
Wonder how long it's going to take CCP before they actually start doing things to the game that will "improve" the game instead off twisting it's neck off even further. I feel bad for all the oldtimers in this game, after years and years off sticking to the program. We are all getting a major **** in our asses.
But maybe thats just me and i am beeing really negative.
BR marked the end of "REAL WARS", N3, Goons, PL won eve and decided to largely avoid each other and mess with everyone else. This lead to null becoming a "blue donut" with people crying to the devs to give them something to do.
Supers/Titans were the biggest factor in stagnation, as a newer entity could not exist in null with out the permission of the big two for fears of getting run over by supers. CCP saw that the bastardization of null needed to end |

Ren Oren
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
79
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 07:44:27 -
[102] - Quote
MindRanger wrote:Redlaw Ikaruga wrote:Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
Defacto not only the super accounts, but their support accounts as well. Imagine a supercarrier or titan like an Abrams tank. To keep a single Abrams operational and ready for battle it requires some ~50 people supporting. Obviously not as extreme for a lousy digital supercapital, but the concept is the same. You won't have a need for logistics toons to provide fuel/stront/etc, no more cyno alts, no more scouts, no more wormhole/ratting/incursion/mission -alts to make isk for those big babies and their blingy modules (eh, how much would you want to bling up your Ishtar anyway) You may see a chain reaction... if it was up to me, I'd rather give supers a new and strategically important purpose, much like every other ship has one. Let them excel in their field just as other category ships do. Anyway, I'm not too worried about it, nerf or buff either way - it may be a sign from Bob that it's time to spend the next decade doing something else :D
LOL non-super pilots are gonna unsub too because supers got nerfed 
Look N3/goons/etc just leave your space after Sov 2.0, theres plenty of former sov holders, bitter enemies, and adventurers just waiting for the chance to get their piece of the null pie. |

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage RAZOR Alliance
510
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 07:45:21 -
[103] - Quote
Life imitates art:
Supers and Titans were designed during a previous incarnation of CCP. I find it hard to believe things would have turned out any other way. As we have seen in real life with only 2 real military powers existing we also see in EVE the eventual emergence of 2 significant powers.
Yes, 2013/14 the large blocs 'won eve' and this much was admitted by greyscale during the o7 show.
Personally I think nothing will really change. Maybe everything will change but fundamentally no it wont. There are no Josep Tito's left in EVE. There is an indoctrinated theory amongst 3rd parties that you are either one side, the other, or irrelevant. I rejoined CFC after 2 years of being out of it and suddenly *I am a traitor* to the whole game and get scorned by people and kicked from public channels. It would almost be funny if it wasn't so sad. It shows a massive disconnect between reality and ideology to treat the situation and changes of circumstances like this.
Veteran and solo/small gang PVP advocate.
|

McChicken Combo HalfMayo
The Happy Meal
451
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 09:48:13 -
[104] - Quote
Linking an EN24 article in the first post should be a bannable offense.
~ Bookmarks in overview
~ Fleet improvements
|

Kiandoshia
Applied Anarchy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2229
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 11:38:11 -
[105] - Quote
Bananable! |

MyIskBank
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 11:39:33 -
[106] - Quote
This is good new for all the noobs and those who cannot fly them! However, EVE to me and many others has been about trying to obtain the best, the rare, ..... so now what? What is there? What happens when all the "new players" want something big and shiny to fly? SOL?? CCP, I have played since 2004, I have been ok with almost every change until recently. You are pushing out the old players, and odds are, they account for most of your income. This is the only change in which I am giving serious thoughts to quitting EVE, not a break, like I have taken a few times, but quitting. I have loved EVE for over 10 years! It has been an awesome game! I understand the need for change, but this is not just change, I hope ccp can see that. That said, I'll try it, hell I haven't used my super in almost a year.... wont miss it. But I think this will be a bad choice by CCP, IMO its first BIG one. |

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
859
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 11:44:16 -
[107] - Quote
Ren Oren wrote:Look N3/goons/etc just leave your space after Sov 2.0, theres plenty of former sov holders, bitter enemies, and adventurers just waiting for the chance to get their piece of the null pie. 
What value is it to you if you didn't earn it yourself? You want a slice, nut up and take it, rather than begging for a handout.
|

Aster Rico
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 11:53:57 -
[108] - Quote
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:[quote=Herzog Wolfhammer] I can see how we got here - we all want space-Dragons, be it to strive to claim our own, or go out in the wilderness and hunt and kill ourselves one (lets be fair, that first titan killmail is so thrilling it takes an effort of will not to frame it!). Just the mechanics don't fulfill that dream.
Beautiful
|

Caleb Seremshur
Gladiators of Rage RAZOR Alliance
510
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 12:02:38 -
[109] - Quote
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:Ren Oren wrote:Look N3/goons/etc just leave your space after Sov 2.0, theres plenty of former sov holders, bitter enemies, and adventurers just waiting for the chance to get their piece of the null pie.  What value is it to you if you didn't earn it yourself? You want a slice, nut up and take it, rather than begging for a handout.
It's not just that - they fail to create any scenario that would be compelling enough for current rental alliances and combat groups to cecede(?) From their coalitions in order to hold their own slice of pie.
I could think of a couple of reasons but I'm not inclined to give it away.
Veteran and solo/small gang PVP advocate.
|

Turn Around
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 14:50:39 -
[110] - Quote
Redlaw Ikaruga wrote:Guess CCP wants to die :P somany super acounts are gonna get unsubbed if this happens, including my 2.
Same here.
|
|

Incindir Mauser
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
521
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 18:10:22 -
[111] - Quote
I don't often speak up in defense of topics out of my area of playstyle, but turning super carriers into toothless stat-sticks isn't the way to go.
Sitting here on my armchair developer throne, I'd rather see supers become a multi-pilot ship with offensive capabilities tied to other friendly pilots being "docked" inside the super manning glorified POS guns or commanding drone flights, totally independent of the "captain" flying it.
Can you multibox it? Yes. But it's no more abusable than multi-boxing anything else in the game.
|

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Cynosural Field Theory.
1544
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 18:22:58 -
[112] - Quote
Incindir Mauser wrote: I don't often speak up in defense of topics out of my area of playstyle, but turning super carriers into toothless stat-sticks isn't the way to go.
Sitting here on my armchair developer throne, I'd rather see supers become a multi-pilot ship with offensive capabilities tied to other friendly pilots being "docked" inside the super manning glorified POS guns or commanding drone flights, totally independent of the "captain" flying it.
Can you multibox it? Yes. But it's no more abusable than multi-boxing anything else in the game.
That sounds intinteresting!
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|

Princess Cherista
State War Academy Caldari State
32
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 18:45:43 -
[113] - Quote
I think they should be more closely aligned with RL carriers. If you look at a US Navy carrier or supercarrier, it is a mobile base that can transport about 200 fighter craft anywhere in the world.
An EVE Online supercarrier should have an super-sized fleet hanger (FLEET HANGER DUH) kinda like a bowhead that you could fit 250 fitted and rigged ships into.
These mobile platforms would go into battle escorted by a fleet, these fleet members could then reship off the supercarrier (once) as they die in battle. |

Khan Wrenth
Hedion University Amarr Empire
116
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 19:03:43 -
[114] - Quote
You know, I actually feel bad for the pilots that trained for supers.
Yes, I have been the person in the camp of "nerf the supers!". Not as something I've started threads over, but something I've generally agreed with when other people talked about it. But, it was always just a fun rallying cry like a high school pep rally. Never had I imagined anything like this.
Super pilots do have my sympathies. No sarcasm there. Having the rug pulled out from under you in such a dramatic fashion is just, well, disheartening.
But I also can see it might be better for the larger game. People have already pointed it out, so I don't really think I need to go over it again. But CCP long ago painted themselves into a corner by putting in this massive apex ships/force multipliers without having a good way of fitting them into the existing meta (way back when they were first introduced). They made them too powerful, no amount of ISK or train time really stopped anyone from acquiring them, especially in large numbers, then it became a clusterfluke.
This is what happens when you introduce content without a good long-term plan for it fitting into the game. It became the elephant in the room in this game for far too long, then people invested heavily in them, and then you're at a point where you're upsetting people no matter what you do. This move is probably healthier for the long-term interests of the game, but the people in those ships have every right to be upset. I know I've been mildly upset every time I trained into something and it got nerfed (I had a really bad run of luck for a while).
Morale of the story is: have a plan for your content and make damned sure it fits in the game. If not, adjust it quickly and sooner rather than later.
HTFU.-á Adapt or die.-á Beware the falcon punch.
|

Bronxston Rotsuda
Nex Exercitus Northern Coalition.
3
|
Posted - 2015.03.12 09:21:22 -
[115] - Quote
MindRanger wrote:
Anyway, I'm not too worried about it, nerf or buff either way - it may be a sign from Bob that it's time to spend the next decade doing something else :D
This! :) |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon Cynosural Field Theory.
1544
|
Posted - 2015.03.12 15:08:00 -
[116] - Quote
So, are we getting ANY statement from CCP here?
TunDraGon is recruiting!
"Also, your boobs [:o] " -á
CCP Eterne, 2012
"When in doubt...make a di++k joke."-áRobin Williams - RIP
|

d0cTeR9
Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance
85
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 04:15:36 -
[117] - Quote
Eugene Kerner wrote:So, are we getting ANY statement from CCP here?
"We have decided to go as originally planned".
Pretty much what they do everytime! LOL! |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
95
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 10:23:55 -
[118] - Quote
d0cTeR9 wrote: Those were nerf, not boosts... I can't even begin to imagine how it would boost them... I'v been around since 2004, and i'v seen how CCP rolls. I also don't remember saying i would quit... actually i have never said that, ever, on any of my toons. Sometimes i take a break, but i don't 'quit'.
jump fatigue is definitely a boost for lowsec. 
Just Add Water
|

d0cTeR9
Astro Technologies SpaceMonkey's Alliance
86
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 16:35:51 -
[119] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:d0cTeR9 wrote: Those were nerf, not boosts... I can't even begin to imagine how it would boost them... I'v been around since 2004, and i'v seen how CCP rolls. I also don't remember saying i would quit... actually i have never said that, ever, on any of my toons. Sometimes i take a break, but i don't 'quit'.
jump fatigue is definitely a boost for lowsec. 

I was referring, in perspective to super's  |

Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
95
|
Posted - 2015.03.13 18:05:54 -
[120] - Quote
d0cTeR9 wrote:Nat Silverguard wrote:d0cTeR9 wrote: Those were nerf, not boosts... I can't even begin to imagine how it would boost them... I'v been around since 2004, and i'v seen how CCP rolls. I also don't remember saying i would quit... actually i have never said that, ever, on any of my toons. Sometimes i take a break, but i don't 'quit'.
jump fatigue is definitely a boost for lowsec.   I was referring, in perspective to super's 
of course, and i was commenting on mine. 
Just Add Water
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |