Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] [18]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |
Freedom7
Hidden Agenda Deep Space Engineering
5
|
Posted - 2016.02.10 14:31:28 -
[511] - Quote
Really Really disappointed that this forum is not CCP's primary communication ..... if I was a conspiracy nut I would say that was a deliberate act to keep us all a bit confused.....
CCP PLEASE START TO UPDATE US WITH MORE DETAIL ..... |
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
175
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 19:40:12 -
[512] - Quote
Extracted from o7: The EVE Online Show - Episode 14 at 14:14 to 14:52
about Citadel billboard. with CCP Edelweiss Software Engineer
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Klatus Doshu
Die Kreuzritter Invidia Gloriae Comes
7
|
Posted - 2016.03.24 05:55:11 -
[513] - Quote
I have a building related question. At the moment you cannot build the structure components (which will be also used for the citadel) in any POS assembly Array right now. Will that be changed? And can you build the citadel in a POS assembly array? What are the plans? Since no assembly arrays nor production modules are planned for the citadels, it could be quite difficult to set-up a large/XL citadel in a high class wh, or do I miss something? If you can't build L or XL ina POS assembly array you have to find a WH connection big enough for a freighter or? That would be quite complicated or? Is that the intention? |
Sabastian Cerabiam
Seventh Element Advent of Fate
7
|
Posted - 2016.03.24 10:07:56 -
[514] - Quote
I dont remember the exact post but CCP did say you would be able to build one in a POS. |
Theo Sotken
Mother Knows Best Corporation
43
|
Posted - 2016.04.06 10:12:35 -
[515] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:Sabastian Cerabiam wrote:I wana know whats gona happen with those of us that have POS bpos. Will they get converted to equivalent citadel ones or will we somehow get reimbursed the isk we spent to buy them? When we get rid of Starbases they will be reimbursed, not converted. Please do a fair reimbursement. All my structure BPOs have been researched to ME:10 TE:20. The last level taking a better part of a year, and a cost of several hundred million. They shouldn't be valued at NPC cost!
CCP should be consistent in its approach. In the industry 'revamp' a lot of highly researched BPO's were unified and alot of research time and expense was lost. If you had been smart you could and should have researched your BPO's before the change to the 10/20 system like many did, which if you had done under your 'fair reimbursement' you will get paid a huge amount of isk for no work and no investment.
Did CCP mess up the industry revamp? I think so but giving huge amounts isk to people who researched them under the old system for peanuts particularly when they failed to reimburse genuinely expensively blueprints is silly.
PS. I like you :) and would not insult you. You already know the above, why ask the question? |
Sizeof Void
Ninja Suicide Squadron
634
|
Posted - 2016.04.16 06:43:50 -
[516] - Quote
Regarding the Palatine, has there been any thought/discussion as to creating some logical in-game reason as to why there can only be one of them at any given time?
If not, I'd suggest something like this:
The Palatine is powered by an ancient Jovian reactor, which was discovered in Thera. The reactor is a one-of-a-kind item, which cannot be analyzed, and therefore cannot be replicated. It is invulnerable to all known forms of damage, and always drops when a Palatine is destroyed.
So, in order to build a new Palatine, you would have to not only destroy the current Palatine, but scoop up the Jovian reactor, as well, and put it in your new Palatine. The reactor should be so large that it requires a freighter to scoop it up, thus ensuring more fun in trying to safely get away with it.
It should also be impossible to dock at a station with the reactor in your ship, due to the massive amounts of energy it produces, and a ship which has it in its cargohold should remain in space, even when logged out. This guarantees that someone will not be able to just collect it, and store it forever in an NPC station or in a logged off ship.
Addendum: The Jovian reactor could be the grand prize for the next AT. |
Buzz Orti
State War Academy Caldari State
296
|
Posted - 2016.04.16 06:46:22 -
[517] - Quote
Sizeof Void wrote:Regarding the Palatine, has there been any thought/discussion as to creating some logical in-game reason as to why there can only be one of them at any given time?
If not, I'd suggest something like this:
The Palatine is powered by an ancient Jovian reactor, which was discovered in Thera. The reactor is a one-of-a-kind item, which cannot be analyzed, and therefore cannot be replicated. It is invulnerable to all known forms of damage, and always drops when a Palatine is destroyed.
So, in order to build a new Palatine, you would have to not only destroy the current Palatine, but scoop up the Jovian reactor, as well, and put it in your new Palatine. The reactor should be so large that it requires a freighter to scoop it up, thus ensuring more fun in trying to safely get away with it.
It should also be impossible to dock at a station with the reactor in your ship, due to the massive amounts of energy it produces, and a ship which has it in its cargohold should remain in space, even when logged out. This guarantees that someone will not be able to just collect it, and store it forever in an NPC station or in a logged off ship. Isn't the Palatine you were referring about, the Palladium?
Builds ship in empty Quafe bottle.
|
Dolorous Tremmens
Lightspeed Enterprises Goonswarm Federation
152
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 18:42:29 -
[518] - Quote
When player built outposts are reimbursed, who will receive the reimbursement? The current sov owners, the corporation that built it or the alliance the corporation was a part of at the time?
Get some Eve. Make it yours.
|
Marcus Tedric
Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation
69
|
Posted - 2016.04.25 20:10:50 -
[519] - Quote
Dolorous Tremmens wrote:When player built outposts are reimbursed, who will receive the reimbursement? The current sov owners, the corporation that built it or the alliance the corporation was a part of at the time?
The only really sensible logic would be for the currently owning Corp to receive the reimbursement.
That said - it might just be simpler to just blow them up - with warning
Don't soil your panties, you guys made a good point, we'll look at the numbers again. - CCP Ytterbium
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
374
|
Posted - 2016.05.10 19:18:39 -
[520] - Quote
Marcus Tedric wrote:Dolorous Tremmens wrote:When player built outposts are reimbursed, who will receive the reimbursement? The current sov owners, the corporation that built it or the alliance the corporation was a part of at the time? The only really sensible logic would be for the currently owning Corp to receive the reimbursement. That said - it might just be simpler to just blow them up - with warning
that's a terrible idea.. cause that would allow anyone (mostly the big boys) to come into systems attacking it just to take over stations and receive payment for the stations from ccp.. so that "current owner" crap is all bullchit.
i honestly think ccp would do that though cause they lack the brains and have way more fanboyism in fozzie right now to do so. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] [18]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |