| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
R0ot
InNova Tech Inc
Xelas Alliance
   |
Posted - 2007.03.03 10:28:00 -
[31]
Heya goonies again id like to point out that Dusk & Dawn do not own Venal, it is owned 100% under the sovereignty of Gurista Pirates please refrain from giving that region to Dusk & Dawn as you can't claim an npc region regardless of it being 0.0 or not. And to those that will turn around and say 'Fountain is an npc region then' i say to you look at the in game map, Check the Soverignity for Gurista Pirates and Serpentis and the say the above line again. 
|
pulsarite
Gallente
Point-Zero
Ratel Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 10:54:00 -
[32]
Much better than previous. I can actually SEE the systems now.As far as I know, its all correct. Does the bit at the top right corner really need to be THAT big though?
If you have noticed this notice then you will notice that this notice should not be noticed.
Alex Karp > "You are a maniac puls." |
Fred0
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 10:59:00 -
[33]
The top 4 constellations north of Rule of Three is claimed by RZR as a share between us/Morsus Mihi/D2 and Iron. We claim it and administer it. But they are allowed to us it with us. Pls update the map accordingly and thanks for a great service.
|
Djerin
Obsidian Exploration Services
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 11:22:00 -
[34]
 Originally by: Seleene
Edited by: Seleene on 03/03/2007 08:38:16
Originally by: Kalralahr
So far, MC is squished into a corner
M8, I was trying to be supportive and constructive by just clarifying where we live. This is hardly the response I was expecting... 
I think you misunderstood.
Nice map btw. But one question - are you gonna upload it with the same filename on updates? I mean in a similar way josh does with his effort.
Originally by: Cipher7
Its like if the Imperial Star Destroyers flew past the X-Wing fighters and started flying circles around them, it would turn Star Wars into a slapstick comedy a-la Benny Hill instead |
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 12:18:00 -
[35]
Nice update. 
-
Vid - 'Killing Mother' |
maarud
Coreli Corporation
Corelum Syndicate
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 12:20:00 -
[36]
D2 are still fighting in fountain. Also, fountain is a BoB region and doesn't belong to Xeles, mark it so.
Maarud.
Proudly a Ex-BYDI member |
Waagaa Ktlehr
Amarr
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 12:38:00 -
[37]
Really like what you have done with making the hexes more transparent and the outer ring a bit more intense etc.
It's still a bit hard on the eyes, but it makes up with a bit more of detail over the other map. I'm liking it so far.
-
-
One ship to jam them all, one ship to damp them.
One ship to suck them dry and in the dark void gank them. |
Liabrath
Gallente
Argent Industries
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:01:00 -
[38]
My eyes are hurting 
=== === === === ===
If I win an auction, please send me a contract link by EvE mail. |
Cazziel
Karjala Inc.
Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:07:00 -
[39]
IRON is missing again. We're part of the Northern Coalition.
|
thoth foc
Elcyion Lacar
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:08:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Cazziel
IRON is missing again.
some things never change 
_________________________
xMenta (DSMA)
xBOS (CA)
xATUK (.5.)
xDICE (BOB) |
|
|
NereSky
Gallente
Rage of Angels
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:14:00 -
[41]
Tbh i quite like it :)
it would be nice to see it linked alongside the map from Joshua, not to replace it as i recognise joshua's hard work ect but a alternative is always nice to see.
|
semp
Caldari
Tyrell Corp
INTERDICTION
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:23:00 -
[42]
How do you define regional aggression??
Take Goon space for example, their space looks peaceful enough, yet over the last month Interdiction has waged a campaign against them in their home, resulting in over 500 ship losses so far for the goonies.
This will continue until our current contract expires.
|
Kyguard
Fire Mandrill
Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:45:00 -
[43]
Nice update 
-
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/0612/Jameswsig.jpg
WeComeInPeace Video
Please keep your signature below the 24000 bytes limit.- Thx Pirlouit |
Francesca Dell'Agio
eXceed Inc.
INVICTUS.
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 13:45:00 -
[44]
In the TNT case I believe you are confusing GUARD with the Guardian Coalition in 87-1CW, check with SolApathy for more info. LQ-0QN is under GUARD claim for their constellation and INVICTUS. for the rest of the northern half of the region.
WTB: In Game Map Setting: Players logged off in system last 24 hours. Guess why ^^
|
katz3
Cataclysm Enterprises
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 14:52:00 -
[45]
I like it. Thanks for the lowres version, for those of us who dont own huge monitors 
___________________
Your signature is too large. Please see the Forum Rules for the limits - Serathu ([email protected])
|
THEGREAT LOBO
PsyCorp
Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 15:02:00 -
[46]
Nice map dude
Keep the updates coming 
|
Enders Vaal
SniggWaffe
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 15:23:00 -
[47]
You should really include a link to the map version before the latest map, so we can do a quick tab back and forth to see the progress made or lost
---
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed dimensions of 400x120 pixels and filesize of 24000 bytes -Conuion Meow ([email protected])
|
Three0fNine
FinFleet
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 15:32:00 -
[48]
Very nice map.
|
Kaia Kua
Macabre Votum
Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:22:00 -
[49]
i love this map, but a latest link like the other map will help alot. i don't see anything wrong with the map its self in the design, the correct positions of alliances will be corrected eventually.
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
... we are not making things easier simply because people complain, though constructive criticism does have an effect, simply saying "I don't like this" doesn't. 
|
NebulousBlur
Minmatar
Unknown Shoe Corp.
SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:51:00 -
[50]
Beautiful map, a definite refinement over the last version. A few of the colours are hard to see when they are not near the borders of the regions, Band of Brothers, Tau Ceti, Ratel, TNT. There are a few hexes in the drone regions that I cannot tell if they are coloured or not, they look black but have the hilights and effects on them. They are between XPact and Ka-Tet.
My only critique is that it is sometimes hard to tell where the boundaries between two alliances are. The glowing borders for regions are nice and really stand out. This is probably too difficult to achieve without a lot of work, but would it be possible to do something similar with 2 bordering alliances. Perhaps you can even use different borders to show the nature of the relationship, one for actively hostile, one for neutral, one for friendly. For instance, the Goonswarm/Red Alliance borders would have the friendly border colors, while Red Alliance/LV border would have the hostile colors.
Another suggestion as an alternative to the above idea is to give the alliance areas a border depending on their policies - NBSI would have one type of border, NRDS would have another. Additional policies could include "NBSI, allies please stay out" and "NBSI, allies welcome" and so forth. This would be a lot more work, but it would convey more useful information. I don't know how you have the map setup as far as layers go, but if you have a layer for each alliance you could create a couple of different border/outline style presets and just smack em onto that layer.
Final idea, could you show the NPC factions that have sov? I think that would be an interesting idea, it could be very subdued compared to the alliances |
|
|
NebulousBlur
Minmatar
Unknown Shoe Corp.
SMASH Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:51:00 -
[51]
Beautiful map, a definite refinement over the last version. A few of the colours are hard to see when they are not near the borders of the regions, Band of Brothers, Tau Ceti, Ratel, TNT. There are a few hexes in the drone regions that I cannot tell if they are coloured or not, they look black but have the hilights and effects on them. They are between XPact and Ka-Tet.
My only critique is that it is sometimes hard to tell where the boundaries between two alliances are. The glowing borders for regions are nice and really stand out. This is probably too difficult to achieve without a lot of work, but would it be possible to do something similar with 2 bordering alliances. Perhaps you can even use different borders to show the nature of the relationship, one for actively hostile, one for neutral, one for friendly. For instance, the Goonswarm/Red Alliance borders would have the friendly border colors, while Red Alliance/LV border would have the hostile colors.
Another suggestion as an alternative to the above idea is to give the alliance areas a border depending on their policies - NBSI would have one type of border, NRDS would have another. Additional policies could include "NBSI, allies please stay out" and "NBSI, allies welcome" and so forth. This would be a lot more work, but it would convey more useful information. I don't know how you have the map setup as far as layers go, but if you have a layer for each alliance you could create a couple of different border/outline style presets and just smack em onto that layer.
Final idea, could you show the NPC factions that have sov? I think that would be an interesting idea, it could be very subdued compared to the alliances |
Haargoth Agamar
S.Y.N.D.R.O.M.E.
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:52:00 -
[52]
Nice map.
|
Haargoth Agamar
S.Y.N.D.R.O.M.E.
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:52:00 -
[53]
Nice map.
|
SHC Derek
We Know Derek
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:56:00 -
[54]
Map that updates every week = automatic win 
--
|
SHC Derek
We Know Derek
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 17:56:00 -
[55]
Map that updates every week = automatic win
--
|
Sieg Zeon
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 18:34:00 -
[56]
Originally by: semp
Edited by: semp on 03/03/2007 13:25:28
How do you define regional aggression??
Take Goon space for example, their space looks peaceful enough, yet over the last month Interdiction has waged a campaign against them in their home, resulting in over 500 ship losses for the goonies.
This will continue until our current contract expires.
Quote:
Here are the details on the map: for conquerable 0.0 space, aggression (arrows) will be put down for active POS sieges in that region. Conflicting sovereignty (see the LV-controlled regions) are shown with multiple colors. Example: the last map showed a front line from the Northern coalition to Xelas/BoB territory in conquerable Fountain space. This was reported to be repelled, so the map indicator is gone. If BoB begins sieging Northern POSes at the same time as the Querious fight, there will be arrows pointing both ways.
If you'd bothered to read the op you wouldn't have even needed to ask. |
Boosthungry
Darkblade Technologies
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 19:01:00 -
[57]
You might want to extend IAC's space a little more. Stations in FAT, V2, and 5-N are now under IAC control.
|
Stahlregen
GoonFleet
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 19:39:00 -
[58]
WHAT THE CRAP DID YOU DO TO MY MAP?!
It looks like dogs breakfast now!
|
Rannek Ven
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 19:56:00 -
[59]
Great colors by the way. It really is pleasant to the eyes. |
arkarsk
Provenance.
|
Posted - 2007.03.03 20:10:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Armois Delgato
Much improved from the last version and quite useful. I like the hexes for their 'wargame' feel and shifting fronts showings. I like Josh's maps as well, but this isn't too bad.
I hate to say it, but good work.
Armois, I never expected to see another GS positive post from you ever again, even if this map is only related to GS
golfclappin'
-----------------
http://www.eve-provenance.com |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |