| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KIAEddZ
   |
Posted - 2003.12.18 14:24:00 -
[61]
Just tweak whats already there.
Thge npc is the major problem, although I can't help feeling its been done on purpose to artifically raise market prices, just decreas the volume of cruisers in each belt, and jobs done :)
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=176347
www.kia-corp.co.uk/killboard
CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we i |
Reptar
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 14:25:00 -
[62]
i love the new patch, just think that maybe the npc's should be in a bit smaller packs
|
Koda
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 14:38:00 -
[63]
No rollback please, I like my skillpoints just the way they are. 
--------------
Share the love in the SNIGG Forums
|
Thyro
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 14:46:00 -
[64]
Edited by: Thyro on 18/12/2003 14:48:33
Edited by: Thyro on 18/12/2003 14:47:30
well this patch its a total abortion so why not to rollback to be back to a fair game platform where everyone was able to get the BPs without the need to play a solo doing the stupid missions?
The problem with BPs and their implementations are easy to fix if CCP puts their thinking in practice.. so for this abortion I vote in a total rollback.
Not because Im against about everything that this upgrade brings but because isn't fair to play a game were people is forced to play missions to get BPs.... for that I rather prefer to play other games that aren't multiplay... coz play missions u dont need to have a multi-play game!
Problems with BP integration... easy FIX for even stupid basic programmers can do!...that is put a limit for number of each BPs per char and corporation... with that easy FIX CCP will stop monopolios... ... its better then a stuppid idea that is distributing BPs as lotery only for those u are able to do stupid missions in a solo-game!
|
Harisdrop
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 14:55:00 -
[65]
Thyro I believe its time for school. Get your backpack and get on the the bus son. And when you get home clean your room, and do your homework before playing on the pc.
--------------------------
Garsh ma it soo cool killing people in there space thingies |
DATEK
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:00:00 -
[66]
There are may ways to rectify issues. Rollbacks should only be used AFTER all else fails. I am not aware of any issues with castor that are severe enough to even consider a rollback.
Vote NO to rollbacks.
DATEK
CEO, Frog Morton Industries |
qrac
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:06:00 -
[67]
no rollback! live with it and adapt.
-------------------------------------------
Insanes numquam moriuntur! |
Atar
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:27:00 -
[68]
I just got my Raven yesterday. The better not roll back, if they do I am gone!
|
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:40:00 -
[69]
I have to say, I'm amazed how many people have said something along the lines of "no rollback, you knew the new rats were hard, deal with it" when the whole rollback issue had NOTHING to do with hard rats.
Amazed how many have said something along the lines of, "no rollback, Castor is a great patch once it's fixed" when the whole point of the rollback was to go back to immediately AFTER - *not* before - Castor went in, so we'd still have it anyway.
But to the point. The actual problem - insane amounts of blueprints and ultra-rare items being given out hand over fist - is being dealt with. The word I have from a GM is that, those who were given all that stuff they shouldn't have been, will have it removed: if they've already sold it to someone else, they will be "requested" to reimburse the sale, at the risk of being appropriately punished for using an exploit.
I still find it hard to believe that's going to be possible, but I'm glad about it, since it means we get what we want: no rollback.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Commander Jones
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:48:00 -
[70]
No rollback... this isn't beta.
(as hard as that is to believe sometimes)
In fact, I'm surprised some people even have the audacity to ask for one.
I guess there's just no limit to the whining of certain folk.
just my 2 isk
"You end up paying good money for the sort of treatment you ancestors spent their short, brutal lives trying to avoid. That's progress"
|
Saladin
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 15:51:00 -
[71]
Please no rollback. Far too many of my enemies lost their battleships to npc rats. If there is a rollback I fear they might not repeat those mistakes
---------------------------
(c) Copyright Saladin, 2005.
Any editing of this post by a third party will be in violation United States Internet Copyright law 46525 of 2003. |
Beringe
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 16:12:00 -
[72]
No rollback.
I did lose my battleship to NPC pirates (arrogant, stupid, grr *mumblemumble* grr), and there may have been people who have suffered bugs and such, but you can't do a rollback on a live server unless something really catastrophic happens.
I'll adapt and learn. And hunt in 0.2 on a cruiser for a while. Which actually promises to be quite challenging. 
As for my scorpion, I'll replace it with a griffin.
-------------------------------------------
"My main griveance with the Caldari state was that once I had finished my work for them, they wanted me dead."
"No, it's none of your business." |
Lone Gunman
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 16:52:00 -
[73]
I am NOT for a rollback BUT, did you notice that the matching rollback thread was locked. But this one has not. I have been following EvE and reading boards for over 3 years now and the equal opportunity moderation never ceases to amaize me.
|
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 17:31:00 -
[74]
 Quote:
... but you can't do a rollback on a live server unless something really catastrophic happens.
It did.
But, they still think they can sort out the mess without resorting to a rollback.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Tease
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 17:52:00 -
[75]
how come this thread didn't get locked like the opposing thread?
-----------------------------------------
[2003.12.17 06:35:20] Corwin > Orvolle is .4? Doesn't that mean that it's
less than .5 ? and isn't .5 what starts the danger level?
[2003.12.30 07:15:50] Corwin > Tech 2, IE expanded cargo holds I, MIning
lasers 2, etc.... TL2 is being released all around you
[2003.12.30 07:21:20] Corwin > tech 2 is released to players. Some players
are busy researching the BPs before building stuff. Others are sitting on
the BPs making copies to make money off of them that way |
Zervun
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 19:06:00 -
[76]
Rollback = no
CCP works hard on this patch to add more realism and difficulty and people can't adjust. Rats that actually take skill to kill ohnoes! HLE!P!11!
|
Clevinger
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 19:09:00 -
[77]
No rollback |
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 19:13:00 -
[78]
Quote:
how come this thread didn't get locked like the opposing thread?
There was already a thread - in another forum - to post that you wanted a rollback. Presumably there was no other thread to post that you didn't.
While I'm here, I'd like to correct my earlier comments about people's reasons for wanting a rollback. I originally posed the question because of the enormous mess about agent missions: I have never held sympathy for anyone who wanted a rollback because "the pirates are too hard" or "I can't find pyrox any more". Things change, deal with them.
Indeed, I didn't realise there *were* any such people until just now browsing the locked "we want a rollback" thread. Now I know why so many have posted here saying, "No we don't." I'd agree with them.
The agent problem still needs resolving, but the team seem to think they can manage that w/o rolling back to Castor plus one second. I have my doubts.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Thyro
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 20:09:00 -
[79]
Harisdrop,
just 2 words if u know very well english..
**** off
|
Techie Zero
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 20:15:00 -
[80]
No rollback. Suck it up and take it like a man.
EVE-I.com~THE Info source |
Ajari Joan
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 20:17:00 -
[81]
Count me in, even if we dont get recognized.
---
"We offer you freedom and individuality while providing you all the good and bad aspects of a growing corporation!" Sonbou Inc.
web: Sonbou Incorporated |
Replicant Amara
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 20:26:00 -
[82]
No role back please...
Get a life... and keep going ....
|
Fencer
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 20:54:00 -
[83]
I see no need to rollback. I have already canceled my account. I think that is a louder message then this type post yea nay thing
in last couple months the user size has dropped some of those are gonna come back and see what is happening now and leave to never return.
this is just another time when usership will drop off.
and no ya can't have my stuff. It is going in trash barrel with the boxed eve game to be burned
My alt hates me, I don't know why. he won't even talk to me anymore |
Darius Shakor
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 21:15:00 -
[84]
No roll back. Everything is peachy.
------
Analysis[Ceasefire]....Complete - 'Term given to the act of firing, causing the ceasation of the life it is directed at |
Katrianna Rift
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 21:18:00 -
[85]
I say no rollback. |
Rizmordan Hillgotlieb
|
Posted - 2003.12.18 23:43:00 -
[86]
NO ROLLBACK
I say this as my entire previous way of income has been all but evaporated.
I'm a big boy and can adapt to change 
Posting for Numbnutz |
Riffix
|
Posted - 2003.12.19 00:53:00 -
[87]
I'll have the player-owned stations with a side of ship decals please, HOLD THE ROLLBACK. Thank you. :-)
"Lead, follow, or get the #@$@#$ out of the way" |
Lord Grim
|
Posted - 2003.12.19 01:14:00 -
[88]
No rollback needed now, since they fixed standings.
Only thing i suggest is that they FIND anyone who got the bugged skills or BPS, and made millions, and take it away. its stupid.
|
HystericalAndUseless
|
Posted - 2003.12.19 01:50:00 -
[89]
No rollback.
Simple as. Adapt or die, works in RL works in Eve. Let the whiners whine, while we just enjoy Eve.
|
dalman
|
Posted - 2003.12.19 02:09:00 -
[90]
WHY THE **** WOULD THEY ROLLBACK?
The game is working perfectly (except some bugs with agents).
M.I.A. since 2004-07-30 |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |