Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Raskil
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:08:00 -
[1]
Concord is no longer performing its intended function.
This is due mainly to Privateers war efforts, in effect making legal pirates in high security space.
CONCORD needs to step up and do something about this since it is CONCORD that is supposed to be protecting the space lanes.
|

Svenstaro
Amarr Templars of Space CORE.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:10:00 -
[2]
While doing some mega-carebearing in Empire today I lost my T2 Abaddon to some Priv, so yes, I must agree it's getting out of hand.
____________________________________________ Toyship Wallpapers |

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:21:00 -
[3]
I like seeing some wartargets in empire, makes it not so boring. Sadly im not often in empire 
Adapt and you will be fine. Either get some serious firepower in empire or join a NPC corp. Or make a carebear alt corp, whatever.
CCP wont change game mechanics because of a (some) wardec(s).
|

Raskil
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:22:00 -
[4]
I cant even run to empire to pickup a new ship or POS supplies without a huge escort. It is ruining the fun aspect of the game now that empire is no longer empire. Now everywhere is 0.0 except that in empire, you cannnot hunt down your enemies becuase they just hide in stations, exploit lag and game mechanics such as Jita ship undocking.
|

stopdropandlol
Gallente F.R.E.E. Explorer EVE Animal Control
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:23:00 -
[5]
i agree you should be completley imune to everyone in empire. and another thing npc's do too much damage and shouldnt shoot me. infact the npc;s should attack whoever is attacking me if i am doing a mission
|

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:30:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Raskil I cant even run to empire to pickup a new ship or POS supplies without a huge escort. It is ruining the fun aspect of the game now that empire is no longer empire. Now everywhere is 0.0 except that in empire, you cannnot hunt down your enemies becuase they just hide in stations, exploit lag and game mechanics such as Jita ship undocking.
Getting shot with black screen is petitionable. Petitions are annoying, but at least the loss is compensated.
I dont know how many black screen killmails privs get, but its sad they spam their killboard with these mails. The ship gets reimbursed, so why post the mail?
Some corps which join privs just want to enlarge their e-peen with those (fake) killmails.
|

Vicious Phoenix
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:36:00 -
[7]
Borrowing a WoW phrase, L2P n00bs. Solutions 1) Move in gangs. 2) Join a corp who isn't dec'd. 3) Make a hauler alt. 4) Stay out of empire 5) The best reason: SHOOT BACK!
CFW (Certified Forum Warrior) I kill people ingame too. |

Lucky Lynn
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:46:00 -
[8]
OMG!. I remember the days when Infinity Ziona was given so much s**t on these forums, flamed and accused of whining.
I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose.
Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
But it wasn't enough. Nope not at all. Why? Because there is a cap on the amount of active war decs a corp is allowed to have. So spawned the alliance.
NOW i think it is absolutely hilarious, how many people are actually whining about that inspirational IDEA.
Funnily enough I have two characters in two different alliances who are actively war dec'd by the Privateers. DO YOU HEAR ME WHINING!? NO YOU DON'T. SO STFU. I have lost numerous ships to the privateers.
In ending all I have to say is congrats Infinity.
|

J Valkor
Blackguard Brigade
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:48:00 -
[9]
Privateer.
PRIVATEER
LEGALIZED PIRACY
PRIVATEER
|

Kodiak31415
An Eye For An Eye Rule of Three
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:49:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Barbarellas Daughter Getting shot with black screen is petitionable. Petitions are annoying, but at least the loss is compensated.
I dont know how many black screen killmails privs get, but its sad they spam their killboard with these mails. The ship gets reimbursed, so why post the mail?
IIRC aren't you invincible or at least unlockable untill about 20 seconds after undock? Unless theres lag or your have a slow computer you should load up long before this. Also this time is the same as the 'redock' timer meaning that so long as your dont activate a module or attempt to move your can instantly redock (attmpting to redock will cancel this timer)...but then again I may just be full of it. _______________________________ Idea stolen from DS:
Pleese exucse any seplling erroos in this psot |
|

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 02:55:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Kodiak31415
Originally by: Barbarellas Daughter Getting shot with black screen is petitionable. Petitions are annoying, but at least the loss is compensated.
I dont know how many black screen killmails privs get, but its sad they spam their killboard with these mails. The ship gets reimbursed, so why post the mail?
IIRC aren't you invincible or at least unlockable untill about 20 seconds after undock? Unless theres lag or your have a slow computer you should load up long before this. Also this time is the same as the 'redock' timer meaning that so long as your dont activate a module or attempt to move your can instantly redock (attmpting to redock will cancel this timer)...but then again I may just be full of it.
Yes, thers lag in Jita  In laggy systems you may undock, have a black screen for some time and wake up in a new clone if camped by privs. Happens from time to time. Happens a lot in Jita i was told 
|

Gladia Horusthu
Gallente Anything Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 03:14:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Gladia Horusthu on 07/04/2007 03:10:48 Wasn't it the intended function of wardeccing to make Empire not-so-safe for people? There are several npc corps accepting applications for those who wish to dodge wardecs. Of course, the trade off for safety is all of the benefits of your corporation. But if you want the bennies, sometimes you have to fight for them.
New Eden is a dark, gritty environment with corporations constantly at war and only a tenuous peace between the Empires. It is dangerous, and CONCORD is fraying at the seams (and has been since the Yulai Convention was signed). Only the worst of crimes are responded to by CONCORD. They use the wardec mechanism to minimize their workload and pay for some of those spiffy vessels they fly.
Privateers actually LOWERS the workload for CONCORD, provides them with a heapload of ISK, and I'm sure is by now CONCORD is their biggest supporter. I wouldn't be surprised if the heads of the corporations in Privateers were invited to every event on the CONCORD social calendar. Not every private organization is willing to drop billions into their laps on a regular basis.
|

Barbarellas Daughter
Lonely Barbarella
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 03:18:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Gladia Horusthu
New Eden is a dark, gritty environment with corporations constantly at war and only a tenuous peace between the Empires. It is dangerous, and CONCORD is fraying at the seams (and has been since the Yulai Convention was signed). Only the worst of crimes are responded to by CONCORD. They use the wardec mechanism to minimize their workload and pay for some of those spiffy vessels they fly.
I like this! 
Originally by: Gladia Horusthu
I wouldn't be surprised if the heads of the corporations in Privateers were invited to every event on the CONCORD social calendar

|

GimmeeThat
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 03:24:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Lucky Lynn OMG!. I remember the days when Infinity Ziona was given so much s**t on these forums, flamed and accused of whining.
I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose.
Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
But it wasn't enough. Nope not at all. Why? Because there is a cap on the amount of active war decs a corp is allowed to have. So spawned the alliance.
NOW i think it is absolutely hilarious, how many people are actually whining about that inspirational IDEA.
Funnily enough I have two characters in two different alliances who are actively war dec'd by the Privateers. DO YOU HEAR ME WHINING!? NO YOU DON'T. SO STFU. I have lost numerous ships to the privateers.
In ending all I have to say is congrats Infinity.
OMG you are sooo old school and so tough. You're like the coolest guys on the internets! A tough guy for the ages!
 |

Lucky Lynn
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 03:25:00 -
[15]
Originally by: GimmeeThat
Originally by: Lucky Lynn OMG!. I remember the days when Infinity Ziona was given so much s**t on these forums, flamed and accused of whining.
I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose.
Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
But it wasn't enough. Nope not at all. Why? Because there is a cap on the amount of active war decs a corp is allowed to have. So spawned the alliance.
NOW i think it is absolutely hilarious, how many people are actually whining about that inspirational IDEA.
Funnily enough I have two characters in two different alliances who are actively war dec'd by the Privateers. DO YOU HEAR ME WHINING!? NO YOU DON'T. SO STFU. I have lost numerous ships to the privateers.
In ending all I have to say is congrats Infinity.
OMG you are sooo old school and so tough. You're like the coolest guys on the internets! A tough guy for the ages!

Cry baby.
|

Del Narveux
Obsidian Angels Enterprises
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 04:41:00 -
[16]
Ya know, it occurs to me that Privs have ****ed off pretty much everyone, and if all the people theyve tried to gank banded together to exterminate privs the problem would take care of itself. An "anti-priv" coalition, if you will.  _________________ [SAK] Alumnus--And Proud Of It! -- aka Cpt Bogus Is that my torped sig cloaking your base?
Originally by: Wrangler Well, at least we have forum PvP..
|

Tachuro Otapaku
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 04:57:00 -
[17]
I can't say I really enjoy being a target two weeks after starting the game.
|

umop 3pisdn
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 04:58:00 -
[18]
World of Warcraft: Its not a game, its a world.
Seriously though... stop your *****ing please. Its not hard to stay alive with no dictors/bubbles in empire and a friendly station or 8 every jump.
Privateers are helping to populate low sec and 0.0, they're living the dream.
Hail to ye, brave privateers 
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 05:13:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Barbarellas Daughter Adapt and you will be fine. Either get some serious firepower in empire or join a NPC corp. Or make a carebear alt corp, whatever.
Adapting is easy, but thats not the problem. This whole Privateer thing is just a f'ing time sink IMHO.
Now I gotta waste time with logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...
Ohh WOOOOOOW, that is a freakintg BLAST MAN. Holy crap how exciting! Hey guys.. I got this game for you to check out... oh but wait... you gotta play...log off.. get your alt.. move things.. log off.. get your alt... play...
WHY THE F should I need to make a bunch of alts to play this game. But I guess revenues from multiple accounts are up for CCP, so why should they give a sh*t.
I for one dont have more than one account, cant see the point in paying to do the above more than once.
|

WillisCorto
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 05:30:00 -
[20]
I know this has been beaten to death but I have to say that I find the problem not with the Privateers as such but the whole wardec thing that makes it so easy for them to do what they do.
To my mind a declaration of war should be huge and not just a 'pay the fine and have at them' thing.
We all know CCP will never change the rules. How many of us have alts on a second account just to haul stuff round empire? Money flows into CCP so they stay silent on the matter and allow it to happen under the guise of game mechanics.
Concord has turned into UN peacekeepers, they may not kill you but they will sit there and watch others do it.
If I had the skill and time it would be good to setup an alternative concord. We become the police. This Police alliance would require proof your wardec was legitimate. If not proved then you either drop the wardec or face the consequences.
Maybe funded by some of those Uber players out there with ISK to burnàà.
The basic premise now seems to be - stay in a NPC Corp or be prepared to go to war.
|
|

RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 05:38:00 -
[21]
Someone hold me. I'm scared.
|

Devious Syn
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 05:51:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Devious Syn on 07/04/2007 05:48:47 I think its all part of CCP's grand scam. This way EVERYONE has to buy another account to move stuff around in empire. Come on, how do ya think they gonna pay all these new People they are hiring?   
|

Azerrad InExile
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:11:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack Adapting is easy, but thats not the problem. This whole Privateer thing is just a f'ing time sink IMHO.
Now I gotta waste time with logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...logging off.. getting my alt.. moving.. logging off.. getting my alt... playing...
Ohh WOOOOOOW, that is a freakintg BLAST MAN. Holy crap how exciting! Hey guys.. I got this game for you to check out... oh but wait... you gotta play...log off.. get your alt.. move things.. log off.. get your alt... play...
WHY THE F should I need to make a bunch of alts to play this game. But I guess revenues from multiple accounts are up for CCP, so why should they give a sh*t.
I for one dont have more than one account, cant see the point in paying to do the above more than once.
Or you could... fight back maybe?
|

Hexman
Cryo Crypt inc. FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:22:00 -
[24]
Bleh...only think that might be nice is increasing the time between you aggressing anybody and being able to dock. That way fighting privateers might become more interesting. Right now its just boring....and yeah, everybody can adapt, but that's another boring instead of interesting process. -= Recruitment post =- |

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:29:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Azerrad InExile Or you could... fight back maybe?
Well, I never said that I did not.
I (my main) have quite often made good target practice of the Privateers, we have had some good battles.
However...
For ONE, that is not ALL i want to do ALL of the time when I am on EVE. And that is what this system turns it into.
I WOULD, at times like to be able to enjoy the other aspects of the game wihout interferrence from this overkill war spam. I thought this is what we had 0.0 and other professions for.
EVE boasts itself on diversity and how you are never locked to any one profession or play style.. well guess what? Now the style has been locked. By the Privateers OWN claim, their experiment has made empire JUST like 0.0, so where is the diversity in that? Its all the same now.
TWO, fighting back gets me nowhere. What, just to get a few kills... woop dee dooooo!
Id rather be spending that effort with my mates in 0.0 for some actual cause and effect. The Privateers have brilliantly formed themselved and they are an idea. They are arbitrary and are willing to sacrifice funds for their.. efforts. Good for them, but far me it is not an interesting enemy, just a hassle to deal with. Its like a shooting gallery with no real feel to it and feels unimmersive.
But that is just me.
|

Kylar Renpurs
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:29:00 -
[26]
Quote: Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
Quoted for absolute truth.
|

Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:50:00 -
[27]
Originally by: J Valkor Privateer.
PRIVATEER
LEGALIZED PIRACY
PRIVATEER
Legalized piracy with consequences!
The target nation navy would hang the privateers if chaugt.
Currently the empire wars are sidestepping the conseguneces.
0.0/low sec war: risk the ship, risk territory, risk structures (POS)
low sec piracy: risk the ship, lose security standing (there is no 0.0 piracy, it is a form of war)
high sec piracy masked as war: risk the ship .....
So while high sec piracy must be feasible, it must have an added penality/risk as all form of group warfare in EVE.
I suggest to add a system to allow true privateer ins game: empire sponsored high sec pirates sponsored by a faction, to attack ships loyals to the enemy faction.
The drawbacks would be: standing loss with the oppposite empire (and gains with the sponsor) based on ship destroyed, empire (non CONCORD) navy will came to the rescue of the target, if it is attacked in a friendly empire territory, with % change of coming, strenght and speed of reaction dependant on security status of the system. Same things for the sentry guns, with the added modifier that sentry guns of stations loyals to the empire sponsoring the privateers don't fire.
|

Aindrias
Amarr Fomus-Amarr Industrial Novus Ordos Seclorum
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 06:55:00 -
[28]
If the solution to the problem is to metagame, then it's no solution at all.
Also, corps are supposed to potentially separate entities and not forced to join an alliance.. which.. pretty much.. with 700+ Privateer members capable at shoots at any 10 member corp.. is it really fair? Right? Stupid?... corps are forced to do to do that "fight back" thing all you guys RAVE at being the answer...
How bout this... SUFFER THE FACT THAT WHAT THE PRIVATEERS ARE DOING IS ULTRA LAME
WAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. We're playing a world.. not a game... ;-)
I like that
Aind
See what you can do with Paintbrush? |

Jaffse HuntST
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 07:13:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Raskil I cant even run to empire to pickup a new ship or POS supplies without a huge escort. It is ruining the fun aspect of the game now that empire is no longer empire. Now everywhere is 0.0 except that in empire, you cannnot hunt down your enemies becuase they just hide in stations, exploit lag and game mechanics such as Jita ship undocking.
Signed. I think CCP should ban every war except when KIA alliance declares, cause they are fighting big boys and not just some random small corp. Also, I think they should make it so if you are Amarr, you should only be able to fly amarr ships, I mean, I must know how to setup my ship when I see gallente in local, I must be prepared for drones ffs not for gallente who flys caldari damnit!! Also, I would like to have a POS in empire, but I would like CCP to make it safe. I mean, I am paying for the game, and now they declared me a war ffs!! Wake up, CCP!!
On a more serious note: get a grip.
|

Karasuma Akane
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 07:39:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Lucky Lynn I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose. Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire." And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
If this was what the purpose of the Privateers continued to be - targeting large 0.0 corporation/alliance operations in Empire space - then that would be wonderful. But my understanding is that they have no plan or purpose anymore, aside from "pew-pewing as many targets as possible" (like EVE was some first-person-shooter game). Hence, they've garnered a reputation (correct or not) for wardecing as many small highsec industrialist/mining/missioning/trading corporations as they can afford, in order to collect easy kills against players who are generally uninterested in or less inclined to engage in PVP combat. 
Perhaps if the Privateers reoriented themselves back toward their apparent beginnings, and set themselves up as a scourge against Empire entry from the major 0.0 corporations and alliances, they wouldn't have such a widespread image as griefer-gankers of carebears? (And they'd be going up against others who are ready and willing to battle, as evidenced by their choice to join a nullsec-based corp.) -----
The possibility of successfully navigating an asteroid field is approximately 3,720 to 1. |
|

FarScape III
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:00:00 -
[31]
If you can Blob in 0.0 some poor ******* nutral then you can not just be able to have a free ride in Empire Either.
The Privateers give it to the 0.0 blobbers just like the 0.0 blobbers give it to the nutrals in 0.0.
What's the matter? You can dish it out but can not take it?
A Minmater City... Cool! My Stats :) |

FarScape III
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:12:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Karasuma Akane
in order to collect easy kills against players who are generally uninterested in or less inclined to engage in PVP combat..)
I'm sorry but how is it that someone in a big alliance is not expecting some PvP? No matter if it is when they are in a mining ship setup or not.
If they want your frozen corps then you should expect them to get it wether you are in your BS or miner setup, a kill is a kill
If you allways always mine then you should be getting protection from your Allaince or why you with them in the 1st place?
Lets face it, these players in big Allainces are complaining because they want their cake and the pie.
When I want to chill I play an alt or join the NPC corp for a while, if I was back in a big alliance then I would expect the extra tactics I had to do to out wit players like the Privateers.
A Minmater City... Cool! My Stats :) |

Logi3
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:28:00 -
[33]
They pay for the wars so its fair game
Back to basics, back to pirating |

Dred'Pirate Jesus
Amarr Ministry of War
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:29:00 -
[34]
Bah.. NPC corp FTW..
War dec that you ninnys.. 
Originally by: David Hackworth ò If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly.
|

FreelancerAlpha
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:35:00 -
[35]
Why not speak to your corp leaders to speak to the alliance leaders about bringing in some empire corps?
I'm sure there must be a few small corps out there that have members that are on often, and who would love a long list of targets in empire. They don't need access to 0.0 (and if they do go to your 0.0 space they'll stand out as potential spies if no prior auth was given), just need access to the dec.
If enough corps sign onto such a deal, the privateers will have more targets floating around who aren't in a hurry to leave, aren't looking to rat, and are perfectly well setup to fight within empire.
If enough alliances then do this, not only will their members/trade routes be safer, but alliance members who want to fight the all-out-war don't have to leave 0.0 or join an enemy of the alliance. They can just put an alt into a 0.0 empire corp.
|

Kronooo
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:36:00 -
[36]
Since when has warfare have to be a fair thing?, hate to break you're bubble but life isn't fair, why should eve be? If enough ppl get annoyed by them the problem will reslove it self, By starting a counter alliance that war decs to corps that leave privateers... etc. see how many members they have left then. Or by using special alt corps in secret off empire trading hubs that put a mirrage of the jita for a 20% markup. (yes there are wealthy traders out there cappable of mirraging all the items in the jita market in reasonable volume).
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:39:00 -
[37]
Edited by: Ki An on 07/04/2007 08:43:42
Originally by: Karasuma Akane
If this was what the purpose of the Privateers continued to be - targeting large 0.0 corporation/alliance operations in Empire space - then that would be wonderful. But my understanding is that they have no plan or purpose anymore, aside from "pew-pewing as many targets as possible" (like EVE was some first-person-shooter game). Hence, they've garnered a reputation (correct or not) for wardecing as many small highsec industrialist/mining/missioning/trading corporations as they can afford, in order to collect easy kills against players who are generally uninterested in or less inclined to engage in PVP combat. 
Perhaps if the Privateers reoriented themselves back toward their apparent beginnings, and set themselves up as a scourge against Empire entry from the major 0.0 corporations and alliances, they wouldn't have such a widespread image as griefer-gankers of carebears? (And they'd be going up against others who are ready and willing to battle, as evidenced by their choice to join a nullsec-based corp.)
In order to educate those that say "I hear Privateers only gank industrial corps. They are lame and coward and... LAME!!11!" I thought I'd do a little study in the actual wardecs of the Privateer Alliance.
From top to bottom (no particular order):
Ka-Tet - 0.0 alliance Daikoku Trade Syndicate - alliance, residency unknown Chimera Inc - Anti-Pirate corp, empire based Ministry of Silly Walks - Seems to be an empire based pirate corp Astral Wolves - 0.0 alliance Fists of Fury - Seems to be a pirate corp. Residency unknown Space Weaponry and Trade - alliance Fury Corporation - Seems to be a 0.0 pirate corp Brethren of Amarr - Seems to be an empire based industrial/mission running corp of medium size Hydra Alliance - 0.0 alliance Ground Zeero - alliance, residency unknown Deep Space Engineering INC - former alliance corp, 0.0 based Prime Orbital Systems - 0.0 alliance Pure. - 0.0 alliance Valainaloce - alliance with ex-ASCN people. Probably 0.0 based Against ALL Authorities - 0.0 alliance X-PACT - 0.0 alliance Curatores Veritatis Alliance - 0.0 alliance Rule of Three - 0.0 alliance Independent Terran Empire - Small mission running/mining corp Goonswarm - 0.0 alliance FATAL alliance - 0.0 alliance Apocalyptica. - Alliance, probably 0.0 based SMASH alliance - 0.0 alliance Black Lion Legion - Smallish empire based PvP corp Coalition of Empires - Alliance, probably 0.0 based The Guardian Coalition - 0.0 alliance DEATH'S LEGION - Empire based pirate corp Phoenix Wing - Empire based role play corp? TAKAGI corp - French empire based corp of medium size Lotka Volterra - 0.0 alliance Curse Alliance - 0.0 alliance The OSS - Alliance, probably 0.0 based Ultima Rati0 - Alliance, residency unknown Fallen Souls - Alliance, residency unknown FREGE Alliance - 0.0 alliance Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate - 0.0 alliance YouWhat - 0.0 alliance E N I G M A - 0.0 alliance RAZOR alliance - 0.0 alliance R i s e - 0.0 alliance O X I D E - 0.0 alliance Morsus Mihi - 0.0 alliance Core. - 0.0 alliance United Legion - 0.0 alliance Sparta Alliance - 0.0 alliance Knights of the Southerncross - 0.0 alliance Combined Planetary Union - 0.0 alliance Dusk and Dawn - 0.0 alliance United Confederation of Corporations - Alliance, probably 0.0 based The Syndicate Inc - Empire based PvP(?) corp of medium size Dark Matter Coalition - 0.0 alliance The Fated - Empire industrial corp (T2 producers by the looks of it) INVICTUS. - 0.0 alliance Decisive Outcome - Empire based pirate corp Freelancer Alliance - 0.0 alliance Intergalactic Freelance Corporations - 0.0 alliance Japanese Mutual Aid Organization - Empire based corp, unknown occupation (can't read Japanese) Brutally Clever Empire - 0.0 alliance Xelas Alliance - 0.0 alliance FOUNDATION - 0.0 alliance Free Trade Zone - 0.0 alliance EternalRising - 0.0 alliance
cont...
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:40:00 -
[38]
Tau Ceti Federation û 0.0 alliance StoneDogS û Empire based industrial/mission running corp Cake Addicts Anonymous û Unknown. Pirate corp? Gryphon Technologies û Empire based industrial corp Energy. û Seems to be an alliance buddy corp or something Ivy League û University Students. Extremely Dangerous.
Of these 69 wars, 50 are against alliances, the vast bulk of which are 0.0 alliances. 8 are against Empire industrial corps.
These are the facts of the matter. Now we can argue about what they mean.
Note, these wars may have changed in the time it took me to write this.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Bangoura
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:50:00 -
[39]
Careful Ki An
We can't let facts get in the way of a good whine.
If we start bringing facts into Privateer arguments people might actually find out about the numerous Capital ship kills, the regular raids and fights in 0.0 and many in low sec, the small ratio of non combat ships that are killed.
But we can't use facts, as people can't whine about us being carebear hauler gankers scared of fighting a T1 cruiser then.
|

Evenfall Phoenix
The Arrow Project The ARR0W Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 08:58:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Raskil Concord is no longer performing its intended function.
This is due mainly to Privateers war efforts, in effect making legal pirates in high security space.
CONCORD needs to step up and do something about this since it is CONCORD that is supposed to be protecting the space lanes.
TO CONCORD: End all stupid posts where the op cannot and will not attempt to hire a scout or make a scouting alt, as well as not participate an any PvP. All a person has t odo is stay in a NPC corp and they can happily macro-mine - mission away without any chance of getting war-decced. Concord please war-dec those that think they should be able to do anything in completly security as they should not be able to as this is not WoW, a concord war-dec would set them straight.
Also Concord please let such ofenders such as the OP know that if they do not fly industrial they will not get ganked as it is a well known "fact" that PA does not participate in any form of PvP and only participates in industrial ganks.
Thank you Concord for you reasonable attitude towards the situation. I hope that your swift action towards the OP result in his/her/its immediate destruction as a lack of intelligence by the OP was not present.
|
|

Karasuma Akane
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 09:07:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Karasuma Akane on 07/04/2007 09:09:14
Originally by: Ki An
Note, these wars may have changed in the time it took me to write this.

Thank you for the list and providing some sort of a factual breakdown of the wardecs. Now I'm just puzzled as to how Privateers have gotten their negative reputation (as expressed all over the forums) and caused so much anti-buzz if operations are truly this aligned toward targeting 0.0 alliances?
There's apparently a perception problem somewhere that's giving Privateers bad public relations. Maybe you need better publicity for the claims that Bangoura added above.
[p.s. - FarScape, I have no idea how you misunderstood my quoted line to mean big alliances when the sentence referred to small carebear corps.] -----
The possibility of successfully navigating an asteroid field is approximately 3,720 to 1. |

Reincarnator
Amarr Brute Force Missions inc
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 09:26:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Ki An Edited by: Ki An on 07/04/2007 08:43:42
Originally by: Karasuma Akane
If this was what the purpose of the Privateers continued to be - targeting large 0.0 corporation/alliance operations in Empire space - then that would be wonderful. But my understanding is that they have no plan or purpose anymore, aside from "pew-pewing as many targets as possible" (like EVE was some first-person-shooter game). Hence, they've garnered a reputation (correct or not) for wardecing as many small highsec industrialist/mining/missioning/trading corporations as they can afford, in order to collect easy kills against players who are generally uninterested in or less inclined to engage in PVP combat. 
Perhaps if the Privateers reoriented themselves back toward their apparent beginnings, and set themselves up as a scourge against Empire entry from the major 0.0 corporations and alliances, they wouldn't have such a widespread image as griefer-gankers of carebears? (And they'd be going up against others who are ready and willing to battle, as evidenced by their choice to join a nullsec-based corp.)
Shortened list of corps/alliances
Some of those are hardly 0.0 alliances, combined planetary union for example.
Originally by: Hango
Please refrain from posting if you have something to contribute. Thank you. -Hango
Sig'd |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 09:32:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Reincarnator
Some of those are hardly 0.0 alliances, combined planetary union for example.
Duly noted. Will change immediately.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Jonas Psalter
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 10:31:00 -
[44]
Firstly, thank you Ki An, for the information. It is interesting...and wasn't PA going to refrain from fighting EVE U? Thought I read that some place....
Firstly, my problem isn't with PA (except their name) as much as the wardec system itself. I just think that any organization so corrupt as to allow the *hundreds* of wars currently going on in "secure" space would be brought down by popular demand. I mean, it's one thing for one war to be swept under the rug, another entirely for 143. Add to it the fact that wars between corporations really only makes sense in Caldari space, and it becomes immersion-breaking.
And before anyone comments, NO, I do not play EVE for the RP side of things.
And yes, if everyone that PA has declared on could join together it would be the end of them. But, and somone more familiar with the corporate/alliance mechanics please correct any errors, you can't form an alliance if one corp is already in a war. You can join an alliance AT war, but you can't create a new one. I don't understand this prohibition, since (presumably) all parties would be aware of the war situation. Just another area needing fixed.
Of course, it could be that CCP really likes all the furor PA is creating, because they intend to "disband" CONCORD as a prelude to factional warfare. After all, do you think CONCORD could be trusted to remain neutral during empire-space-wide warfare? I certainly wouldn't trust them.
|

Lady Ganker
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 10:35:00 -
[45]
Privateers are purifiers, they weed out all the weak and unworthy.
|

Kagura Nikon
Minmatar Guardians of the Dawn Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 11:18:00 -
[46]
The thing I don 't like about privateers is that they brake the immersion on the war dec system. That was tougth so that two rivcal factiosn coudl fight in empire. But privateers are no rivals of anyone. They are not disputing anythign with these corps.
They are there to act as legalized piracy.. and that for me completely breaks the immersion.
The just made extremely necessary to have a haulign alt to buy thing in empire and bring to low sec for when you want ressuplies. That is jsut boring, extend the need of metagaming .. so immersion break.
Its nto hard to avoid them, but its a pain in the ass that make the game much less fun.
Well its not solely PRivateers fault! In fact they are the less guilty. IF trader had somethign between ears they woudl figure out that with privateers, its much better to spread the commerce alogn the galaxy.
I for example NEVER EVEr go to jita, rens or other trade hubs.. because of them. So .. wake up and shatter these trade hubs!
If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough |

Miner Betty
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 11:18:00 -
[47]
The only place you are safe in eve is a station.
Thats why I love it. |

Marcus Aurelius
Colossus Security Services
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 11:35:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 07/04/2007 11:33:27 Simple, max 5-10 wars per alliance at any time. Plus plug the 24hr dec hole.
Empire wars are a mechanism that needs to exist. But privateers indeed take it to extremes that go a bit far.
However, nothnig stops others from attacking them with an alliance of their own. All this whining only serves to make privateers the most fun place to be at, rather then a possible counter-alliance.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 11:39:00 -
[49]
This just in having a war declared on you disables your high slots!
ALERT THE MASSES!
|

Banana Torres
The Green Banana Corporation Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 12:07:00 -
[50]
To make things simple, I will borrow some marketing crapspeak from my pal Bill, so think of Eve coming in several "Editions"
Eve Online Home Basic This edition is for those begining with Eve and for those who are very risk averse. You can almost totally avoid PvP by staying in an NPC corp and never leaving high sec.
Eve Online Home Premium Now you have joined a corp, so you have access to corp facilities, like corp hangers and the corp POS. But with these benefits comes a drawback, a possible Privateer wardec and PvP.
Eve Online Business So your in an alliance now. You have access to the full features of Eve, outposts, titans and 10/10 complexes. However, as in all businesses only the people at the top get full access to all features, most plebs just do as they are told.
Eve Online Ultimate Your a Privateer.
So, to the OP, it seems that you want to install Eve Online Home Basic Edition.
|
|

Ayumu Kosuga
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 12:15:00 -
[51]
<3 ki an
|

Marquis Dean
The Last Thing You'll Ever See
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 12:25:00 -
[52]
Ki An ftw!
Lol @ the OP. Why is it that the OP on anti-PRVTR threads never manage to show their corp ticker?
---
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait will explain when i have the time i promise
|

RevJim
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:03:00 -
[53]
Privateers. High-sec griefer alliance who target non-pvp players. Yes many of the alliances they war-dec are pvp, but the members who venture into Empire are not looking for pvp, they are trying to avoid pvp and are mission running, trading, hauling stuff about hence they die easily to the griefer privateers. I have had to leave my corp, and alliance to avoid being killed repeatedly. The final straw was when they managed to scram my pod (lag ftl) and ransomed me. So within 24hrs I will return to a noob corp and be safe from the privateer log-on traps and black screen lag-death, and be able to do what I wish. The big downside is that I will lose contact with my friends in my corp and alliance, this is a game buster for me. One of the reasons I play this game is the social side of things, being able to make new friends, even meet up and get roaring drunk sometimes. So not only have the privateers ruined a very good game, they have also damaged an area that infringes on my "real life". For this I will always assist any person I meet in-game by scouting, scanning and even material help where needed when they come into contact with these game busting griefers. I seem to remember a thread about how the privateers are fighting for the little guy... what a joke, well it is April.
The only solution I can see is to use escalating war-dec costs, doubling with each dec, 1-2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256 etc. This would limit the number of war decs, but it would not solve the problem of players wanting to spoil the game for others.
RevJim
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:14:00 -
[54]
Originally by: RevJim Privateers. High-sec griefer alliance who target non-pvp players. Yes many of the alliances they war-dec are pvp, but the members who venture into Empire are not looking for pvp, they are trying to avoid pvp and are mission running, trading, hauling stuff about hence they die easily to the griefer privateers. I have had to leave my corp, and alliance to avoid being killed repeatedly. The final straw was when they managed to scram my pod (lag ftl) and ransomed me. So within 24hrs I will return to a noob corp and be safe from the privateer log-on traps and black screen lag-death, and be able to do what I wish. The big downside is that I will lose contact with my friends in my corp and alliance, this is a game buster for me. One of the reasons I play this game is the social side of things, being able to make new friends, even meet up and get roaring drunk sometimes. So not only have the privateers ruined a very good game, they have also damaged an area that infringes on my "real life". For this I will always assist any person I meet in-game by scouting, scanning and even material help where needed when they come into contact with these game busting griefers. I seem to remember a thread about how the privateers are fighting for the little guy... what a joke, well it is April.
The only solution I can see is to use escalating war-dec costs, doubling with each dec, 1-2-4-8-16-32-64-128-256 etc. This would limit the number of war decs, but it would not solve the problem of players wanting to spoil the game for others.
RevJim
Uhm... lol?
You know, it's not really the Privateers that is your problem, but rather the fact that you expect to be safe in High-Sec. Your post is just another of the "OMG they killed me, they must be griefers" variety, and is really not needed. If you have a grudge with the Privateers, or are angry they killed you, try to take it out in game, preferably by shooting someone.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Brisi
Veto.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:21:00 -
[55]
Awwww, someone can't run risk free lvl 4's anymore, I feel so sad for you.

Resistance is Fertile. |

Shiguni Jhi
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:24:00 -
[56]
Originally by: RevJim Privateers. High-sec griefer alliance who target non-pvp players. Yes many of the alliances they war-dec are pvp, but the members who venture into Empire are not looking for pvp, they are trying to avoid pvp and are mission running, trading, hauling stuff about hence they die easily to the griefer privateers. I have had to leave my corp, and alliance to avoid being killed repeatedly. The final straw was when they managed to scram my pod (lag ftl) and ransomed me. So within 24hrs I will return to a noob corp and be safe from the privateer log-on traps and black screen lag-death, and be able to do what I wish.
...
RevJim
Word, Rev. I had to laugh at that one claim that the PA targets 0.0 corps/alliances. BFD. I've never seen a PA enter 0.0., they prey at the edges looking for singles to come through the gates into highsec. Cowards. Pathetic. If these "pirates" were actually interested in preying on rich alliances and getting loot, I could understand it. But when I'm in a shuttle and I get not only shot up at a gate but pod-killed, well, BRAVO brave pirates. Hope you enjoyed that one.
And for those idiots who think that Privateers are some romantic takeoff of the 1600s carribean adventures, the idea was that a nation would grant the pirate immunity from pirating laws so that he was acting on behalf of the nation during a time of war. If that were the case, PA members "assisting" another alliance as part of a war, again, that would be understandable and supportable.
This? This is just anarchists and griefers. BS excuse to get away with easy kills. Cowards.
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:29:00 -
[57]
Originally by: Shiguni Jhi Word, Rev. I had to laugh at that one claim that the PA targets 0.0 corps/alliances. BFD. I've never seen a PA enter 0.0., they prey at the edges looking for singles to come through the gates into highsec. Cowards. Pathetic. If these "pirates" were actually interested in preying on rich alliances and getting loot, I could understand it. But when I'm in a shuttle and I get not only shot up at a gate but pod-killed, well, BRAVO brave pirates. Hope you enjoyed that one.
And for those idiots who think that Privateers are some romantic takeoff of the 1600s carribean adventures, the idea was that a nation would grant the pirate immunity from pirating laws so that he was acting on behalf of the nation during a time of war. If that were the case, PA members "assisting" another alliance as part of a war, again, that would be understandable and supportable.
This? This is just anarchists and griefers. BS excuse to get away with easy kills. Cowards.
Sigh... Here they come, the kiddies with an axe to grind...
I thought this thread was refreshingly free of just that sort. Sure, we had other types of whines, but just this particularly annoying one has been absent until now.
You know, you are not just uninformed about the Privateers, you are uninformed about EvE in general. I can suggest two causes of action for you:
1. Read up a bit on this game you've joined, and see that you are NOT supposed to be COMPLETELY safe ANYWHERE, and that shooting someone isn't griefing. You will also notice that noone cares what you find "pathetic" or not. Personally, I'd say that you where the pathetic one, as you apparently died. 
2. Cancel your sub and find a game more suited to your particular style of play.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Ling Xiao
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:31:00 -
[58]
The whole wardec system is "legalised piracy". That's the whole damn point.
ps - world, warcraft, etc you know the drill. __________ If you think the game is rigged, why are you still playing? |

Ayumu Kosuga
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:39:00 -
[59]
Originally by: RevJim Privateers. High-sec griefer alliance who target non-pvp players. Yes many of the alliances they war-dec are pvp, but the members who venture into Empire are not looking for pvp, they are trying to avoid pvp and are mission running, trading, hauling stuff about hence they die easily to the griefer privateers.
ok .. either they contribute to the 0.0 alliance anything - like ISK, logistic support etc. - then PVTs are hitting the 0.0 alliance everytime they kill a "empire based non-PvPing 0.0 alliance-member" ... or they contribute nothing to the alliance. but then again - why did they join the alliance in the first place?
Quote:
The big downside is that I will lose contact with my friends in my corp and alliance, this is a game buster for me. One of the reasons I play this game is the social side of things, being able to make new friends, even meet up and get roaring drunk sometimes. So not only have the privateers ruined a very good game, they have also damaged an area that infringes on my "real life". For this I will always assist any person I meet in-game by scouting, scanning and even material help where needed when they come into contact with these game busting griefers.
if you need a certain corpticker to meet people in RL/have contact with them in-game something is going horrible wrong. or does your cell-phone ask you which corp-ticker you have if you want to call one of your friends in your old corp? or does your e-mail program ask you what corpticker you have if you want to mail on of your friends in your old corp?
PVTs won't make you lose contact with your friends, only your own lazyness. 
|

GimmeeThat
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:41:00 -
[60]
Want some free loot?
Time to put those alts to good use, create a new character and move it to a highly populated trade hub frequented by the privateer. Then loot all their kills. That's right boys and girls Economic Warfare. Let's make sure that all of their war efforts come out of pocket from this time on.
Disclaimer: This is not my original idea but rather an adopted idea. |
|

Gralg Merglen
Minmatar Fusion Enterprises Ltd DeStInY.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:45:00 -
[61]
Privateers wardec'd my last Ally and I have to say that it was the most fun week a lot of us have ever had, seeing the carebears in my corp turning into bloodthirsty killers in the blink of an eye. People need to stop thinking "OHNOES PRIVATEERS ARE GONNA GANK US ALL!!!111ONE" and think of it this way:
Free PVP Lessons for a week.
They're paying for the pleasure, not you, and 9 times out of 10 they run away when they see a group of more then 4 or 5 of you together anyway. we killed 8 and lost 8, 3 of our losses were in the first day when stupid carebears who don't read ally/corp mails and got caught with their pants down in haulers :p
Its not like you don't get enough NOTICE that you're being Wardec'd in most games with a war declaration system I've played the first hint of any wardec on you was your people getting killed.
If you can't use the tools provided to you, go play a non PVP Realm on WoW, we don't want you  Mods nerfed my monkey :( *evil point* |

RevJim
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:49:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Ki An
Uhm... lol?
You know, it's not really the Privateers that is your problem, but rather the fact that you expect to be safe in High-Sec. Your post is just another of the "OMG they killed me, they must be griefers" variety, and is really not needed. If you have a grudge with the Privateers, or are angry they killed you, try to take it out in game, preferably by shooting someone.
/Ki
I do not expect to be safe in high-sec. I have no argument with the privateers who gank me, they use some good tactics (and some questionable ones) and fly mainly high-end T2 fitted pvp ships (Command ships are very popular) but I do not return fire, ever! there is no point, the ships I fly cannot even scratch a privateer command ship. I do not play this game to pvp constantly. My only real regret is that self-destruct takes too long, I hate adding to the killmail epeen of the privateers. In my opinion the people that enjoy killing other players who cannot fight back (or in my case refuse to fight back) is rather low, evolutionally challenged is probably the politically correct term. Re-read my post, the game buster is the destruction of certain social aspects of the game. Not the destruction of my cheap easily replaced ships.
Originally by: Brisi
Awwww, someone can't run risk free lvl 4's anymore, I feel so sad for you.
As for running lvl4's yep thats one of the reasons I play the game, to run missions that CCP have put in the game for players who do not wish to PvP, yet enjoy a minor challenge, as for risk free... try lvl3's in a frigate, I do find that an enjoyable challenge.
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:56:00 -
[63]
Originally by: RevJim
I do not expect to be safe in high-sec. I have no argument with the privateers who gank me, they use some good tactics (and some questionable ones) and fly mainly high-end T2 fitted pvp ships (Command ships are very popular) but I do not return fire, ever! there is no point, the ships I fly cannot even scratch a privateer command ship.
How would you know that if you never tried? And for the record, I've been at war with the Privateers on two separate occations, and I'v actually never seen them fly a command ship once. Doesn't mean they never do, but I'd say what they fly is pretty varied.
One way to be able to take them down is to group up. A sensible thing to do when at war.
Originally by: RevJim
I do not play this game to pvp constantly.
No one's forcing you to. You can do all sorts of stuff, even while at war, and it's quite easy to avoid PvP. If you really REALLY don't want to PvP, ever, join a NPC corp and stay in high sec.
Originally by: RevJim
My only real regret is that self-destruct takes too long, I hate adding to the killmail epeen of the privateers.
Best way to avoid giving them another kill is to form a gang and shoot them before they shoot you. Or, to avoid them.
Originally by: RevJim
In my opinion the people that enjoy killing other players who cannot fight back (or in my case refuse to fight back) is rather low, evolutionally challenged is probably the politically correct term.
Wait a minute. You are saying people who shoot others are "evolutionally challenged"? Evolution, as in, survival of the fittest? They survive, you don't... See a pattern here? I'd say you are the one who's evolutionally challenged.
Originally by: RevJim
Re-read my post, the game buster is the destruction of certain social aspects of the game. Not the destruction of my cheap easily replaced ships.
I didn't know the Privateers where equipped with a mod that blocks your attempts to contact your friends. Is it a Remote Conversation Blocking Emitter I? I wish I had one.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

AKULA UrQuan
Caldari STK Scientific Rule of Three
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 13:58:00 -
[64]
*Shrug*
Whip up a quick hauler alt in under an hour and privateers becomes pretty much illrelavent.
|

Roy Batty68
Caldari Immortal Dead
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 14:24:00 -
[65]
TO RASKIL
We can't be arsed. But out of consideration for the fact that your taxes pay for our donuts, we took five minutes to analyze the situation for you. We hope you appreciate us sacrificing one of our breaks for you.
The Privateers continue to exist because you allow them to. The current situation provides them an enjoyable experience that can even be profitable at times. Our analysts have come to the following conclusion:
Change their environment.
It's really that simple. Should all these alliances, who the Privateers have convieniently war dec'ed, take a break from their ****ing contests in 0.0 space and take it to the Privateers en mass... Well, that would effectively change their environment from one of comfortable enjoyment, to one more akin to what their victims experience. Turn the tables on them, so to speak. Call it Privateer Hell Week (you can use that one for free).
However, our analysts have also concluded that you can't be arsed either. C'est la vie.
We sincerely hope this study has been helpful to you. Until next time, fly safe and mind who you shoot.
Yours, ááCONCORD
------------------- Say What? |

RevJim
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 16:35:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Ki An
How would you know that if you never tried? And for the record, I've been at war with the Privateers on two separate occations, and I'v actually never seen them fly a command ship once. Doesn't mean they never do, but I'd say what they fly is pretty varied.
One way to be able to take them down is to group up. A sensible thing to do when at war.
Well every ship destruction evemail I have from Privateers has Command ships on it, sometimes as many as 4. I can only think you have a poorer class of privateer in your area And I did try to fight back in the beginning, but I might as well have been using snowballs, so I no longer bother, no point.
Originally by: RevJim
I do not play this game to pvp constantly.
Originally by: Ki An
No one's forcing you to. You can do all sorts of stuff, even while at war, and it's quite easy to avoid PvP. If you really REALLY don't want to PvP, ever, join a NPC corp and stay in high sec.
Mmmm, I could train trade skills and never undock I suppose, you may have a point there, but no matter, NPC corp for me (for a little while anyway)
Originally by: RevJim
My only real regret is that self-destruct takes too long, I hate adding to the killmail epeen of the privateers.
Originally by: Ki An
Best way to avoid giving them another kill is to form a gang and shoot them before they shoot you. Or, to avoid them.
Agreed.
Originally by: RevJim
In my opinion the people that enjoy killing other players who cannot fight back (or in my case refuse to fight back) is rather low, evolutionally challenged is probably the politically correct term.
Originally by: Ki An
Wait a minute. You are saying people who shoot others are "evolutionally challenged"? Evolution, as in, survival of the fittest? They survive, you don't... See a pattern here? I'd say you are the one who's evolutionally challenged.
Again fair point, so following your reasoning, I should wardec noob corps and kill them all, after all it's survival of the fittest. You actually miss the point here, I class the privateers in the same mould as the players in on-line FPS that sit at a respawn point and kill people as they respawn.
Originally by: RevJim
Re-read my post, the game buster is the destruction of certain social aspects of the game. Not the destruction of my cheap easily replaced ships.
Originally by: Ki An
I didn't know the Privateers where equipped with a mod that blocks your attempts to contact your friends. Is it a Remote Conversation Blocking Emitter I? I wish I had one.
Well as an analogy, you visit a club to meet friends, but one night you get mugged on the way, and mugged again the following week, and again. You eventually stop going to the club for obvious reasons, you still keep in touch with the friends you have but you become marginalised and eventually lose touch due to not going to the club regularly, I really hope you see my point here.
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 16:48:00 -
[67]
And tell me another thing.. why the HELL should I have to join a NPC corp to "deal" with the Privateer alliance.
Isn't EVE about PLAYER BASED CORPS!!!!!!!!
I am mean... are you F-cking kidding me that you solution to the wardec abuse is to LEAVE a player based corp and join a NPC corp?
Man.. what a step back in EVE mechnaics.
Do some of you newer players realize how much EFFORT went into actually getting Player corps to where they are now.. and now what... we are supposed to abandon that bacause of this abuse?
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 16:51:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack And tell me another thing.. why the HELL should I have to join a NPC corp to "deal" with the Privateer alliance.
Isn't EVE about PLAYER BASED CORPS!!!!!!!!
I am mean... are you F-cking kidding me that you solution to the wardec abuse is to LEAVE a player based corp and join a NPC corp?
Man.. what a step back in EVE mechnaics.
Do some of you newer players realize how much EFFORT went into actually getting Player corps to where they are now.. and now what... we are supposed to abandon that bacause of this abuse?
No, you don't have to go back to an NPC corp. That's the only way to avoid ever getting decced though. In EvE, PC corps = deccable, NPC corps = not deccable. It's a trade-off.
Another "solution" to a war dec is to fight back.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 16:54:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Ki An No, you don't have to go back to an NPC corp. That's the only way to avoid ever getting decced though. In EvE, PC corps = deccable, NPC corps = not deccable. It's a trade-off.
I think you missed my point
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 17:02:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Originally by: Ki An No, you don't have to go back to an NPC corp. That's the only way to avoid ever getting decced though. In EvE, PC corps = deccable, NPC corps = not deccable. It's a trade-off.
I think you missed my point
Actually, I think you missed the point of this game.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 17:02:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Originally by: Ki An No, you don't have to go back to an NPC corp. That's the only way to avoid ever getting decced though. In EvE, PC corps = deccable, NPC corps = not deccable. It's a trade-off.
I think you missed my point
Actually, I think you missed the point of this game.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 17:11:00 -
[72]
Edited by: Spaceman Jack on 07/04/2007 17:08:21 LOL ok... Well, I am not going to get into a ****ing cont4est with you here.
But let just keep in mind that instead of one simple solution, here we are trying out this complex series of alt switching events that just wasts people times. Maybe you get to play for 18 hours a day, but I dont. It rather just login once. I though needing or even USING an alt was a CHOICE in EVE. I forgot the part where CCP said it was a requirement.
But maybe youre right, maybe EVE has turned into a puzzle game and I have missed that note.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 17:15:00 -
[73]
You can end legalized piracy when you end legalized wallet pwning by traders
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 17:15:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack Edited by: Spaceman Jack on 07/04/2007 17:08:21 LOL ok... Well, I am not going to get into a ****ing cont4est with you here.
But let just keep in mind that instead of one simple solution, here we are trying out this complex series of alt switching events that just wasts people times. Maybe you get to play for 18 hours a day, but I dont. It rather just login once. I though needing or even USING an alt was a CHOICE in EVE. I forgot the part where CCP said it was a requirement.
But maybe youre right, maybe EVE has turned into a puzzle game and I have missed that note.
It's really not that hard to understand, dude. EvE has non-consentual PvP. That means, you don't get to chose. The choice is made for you when you undock. You can take steps to avoid PvP, but those won't always work. Some corps do nothing but PvP, some don't ever do any PvP. Guess who normally wins in a PvP situation?
My advice to you: Get some PvP experience. If you find you hate it, switch to another game.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Aindrias
Amarr Fomus-Amarr Industrial Novus Ordos Seclorum
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 18:01:00 -
[75]
ZOMG
I guess if the Privateers say the game "This way..." then I guess it is.
"ZOMG N00B didn't you know? You're not safe ANYWHERE!"
Apparently.. with the current war dec system and Privateers... Empire = 0.0 so WTF is the point to diff Security systems? Just make it all 0.0... Fug it.. it's like that now anyways for a minimal cost.
I guess all the HOURS AND HOURS CCP spent programming the universe as it is can be sexploited by "WTFPwnU anywhere I want" monkeys.
What's unique about this game isn't that it's non-consentual PvP, is that it allows for varying degrees of safety on the same server. Privateers basically make it a One Dimensional Game and the "answer" to it is Metagame.. spend more money on another account, not associate with your corps cuz yer on your alt etc..
Sure.. band together with more people.. travel in groups for safety... which will just escalate the problem.. not actually DO anything.
Aind
See what you can do with Paintbrush? |

MeestaPenni
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 18:24:00 -
[76]
Quote: The Privateers continue to exist because you allow them to.
Quote: They pay for the wars so its fair game
I borrowed two random quotes from the thread to make a point. I don't think PRIV is actually paying out of pocket for many of these wars. Someone else is paying the money. Could be one of your corpmates, could be someone tired of bumping your BS outside the Aunia station. Could be someone you really annoyed in some stupid, seemingly inconsequential way.
While the Privateers business model does seriously change the game experience for many players.....they are enabled by the people willing to fork over the chump change required to declare a war.
|

Dr Slice
OctoberSnow Corp
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 18:51:00 -
[77]
Much crying in this thread. Boohoo.
::hands out tissues::
|

AceOfSpace
Pineapple Blunder
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 18:59:00 -
[78]
I think Privateers has performed the very useful purpose of demonstrating the problem with the wardec system to those who haven't already experienced it. They are certainly not the problem themselves, just a nice example of it.
-it's my job to do it- |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 19:04:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Aindrias
Apparently.. with the current war dec system and Privateers... Empire = 0.0 so WTF is the point to diff Security systems? Just make it all 0.0... Fug it.. it's like that now anyways for a minimal cost.
Empire is like 0.0 for the 0.0 alliances the Privateers have decced, as was the intended purpose of the Privateers in the first place. I'd say they are doing a good job, and leave it at that.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Paranoid Fiber
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 19:34:00 -
[80]
Actually war decs are a good thing if you think about it. Someone is delcaring thier intentions to you. They are saying if I see you, you may die. Plus in local, and on the overview, you can eaisly differenciate between a hostile and a non hostile. Compare that with low-sec and null-sec. You have now idea you is after you, you have to assume it is everyone.
|
|

Gladia Horusthu
Gallente Anything Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 19:47:00 -
[81]
Originally by: WillisCorto
The basic premise now seems to be - stay in a NPC Corp or be prepared to go to war.
It's not just the basic premise now, this has been the basic premise from day one.
People act as though Privateers was the first group to do this- fact is, they are the biggest group but this type of thing has always happened.
Corp wars were supposed to be ransoming activities: you declare war against another corporation to force them to do something, whether to cough up some big iskies, or to force a public statement, or to force a particular office to close, or to obtain an expensive BPO you know they have, or something else like that. And that has always happened in Eve, though most of the time unless the corporations involved were rp based it's been strictly after ISK. Sometimes it was because a small corporation had put up a POS and were seen as unable to defend it (often the case) and so they made themselves a victim.
That is New Eden. Corporations are war targets. Period. If you don't like combat pvp, there are the npc corporations amd highsec space to play in, sucky as that may be.
|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:20:00 -
[82]
Originally by: RevJim Anti Priv Whine
RevJim
Hey I remember you, I pwned your BS while you were mission running in Del, You took it like a man and congratualted me for scanning you down as I remmember- dont shame yourself by coming here to whine.
Incidently after pwning missions runners in Del for a few weeks I guess I over stayed my welcome, and on a slow day I was setup and ganked.
Privateers isnt risk free - and neither is being in any player organisation. I would be happy to tell you how to avoid getting pwn'd in missions, how to dodge gate camps etc. It does mean you cant AFK missions/Fly afk etc and it will take more effort than not being at war...but its up to you. You can take the easy route and drop your corp - or get in touch, get some free tips and learn how to avoid unwanted PVP.
sorted
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:27:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Ki An My advice to you: Get some PvP experience. If you find you hate it, switch to another game.
How the hell are you qualified to dole out advice when you dont know my situation? Im sorry, you must know better than me how many kill/losses I have.
Just becuase I dont like the Privteers abuse of the wardec system does not mean i don't know how to PVP. That kind of assumption shows something about your thought process.
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
Eveyone is like.. "well go to WOW now".. LOL, the funny thing is thast with this abuse this game has BECOME like WOW.
|

Soporo
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:30:00 -
[84]
Yeah, the Privs are sometimes a pain, but you know what? After being decc'd continuously for the last 4 months by random people, such things cause a change in behavior, and before you know it its not even much of a bother.
Some advice...IF WARDECC'D ANYWHERE BY ANYONE:
Check my bio, and set-up your overview for WAR.
Double check your clone update and spawn.
When traveling carrying anything worthwhile, keep a Secure Can in your hold with a password set. If it looks like a gank is coming, jet it and anchor so no one can get it. Also, if you see a gank coming, right click your ship and click Self-Destruct.Keep an eye on a clock or watch closely, and decide whether you want to let the timer run out depending on the circumstances. It's something like 2 minutes, go test it yourself, to disengage the self-d, just select self-d again.
Don't haul ANYWHERE without a scout or an Alt, at the very least.
Courier Contracts FTW. If it HAS to be moved some distance, pay someone to do it, and don't be a cheap bastard.
The liberal use of Jump Clones is very helpfull..
Check Local every minute, at least.
If a tool is in Local, exit station in something cheap and look around first, before bringing that Rattelsnake BPC out in a ****** Hauler.
STAY TF OUT OF JITA, RENS, etc! Avoid HUGE, BUSY, IDIOTIC HUBS LIKE JITA, RENS etc.
Join intel channels like Priv-Death, and post any sightings imediately.
And MY all time faveorite: Jump Clone to 0.0 to rat a bit, or mine, help out in Alliance ops for a change of pace.
Another favorite is, get an undecc'd Alt charracter in a hauler, go wherever there are Privs and follow them around stealing loot from wrecks.
Another option is, get a buncha people together in cheap stuff and jump clones, hunt privs, work on pvp skills.(10 Blackbirds is fun as hell)
Empire decs suck, but use your God given wits and formulate a plan. A sh*tty plan is better than no plan at all...usually.
|

hedfunk
Caldari Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:32:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: RevJim Anti Priv Whine
RevJim
Hey I remember you, I pwned your BS while you were mission running in Del, You took it like a man and congratualted me for scanning you down as I remmember- dont shame yourself by coming here to whine.
Incidently after pwning missions runners in Del for a few weeks I guess I over stayed my welcome, and on a slow day I was setup and ganked.
Privateers isnt risk free - and neither is being in any player organisation. I would be happy to tell you how to avoid getting pwn'd in missions, how to dodge gate camps etc. It does mean you cant AFK missions/Fly afk etc and it will take more effort than not being at war...but its up to you. You can take the easy route and drop your corp - or get in touch, get some free tips and learn how to avoid unwanted PVP.
sorted
You're too kind :(
|

Ayumu Kosuga
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:36:00 -
[86]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
that'S the reason why privateers have every right to their wardec's.
traders/producer force their prices on combatants. combatants force bullets and missiles on the traders/producers.
it's a circle. 
|

Synapse Archae
Amarr Solarflare Heavy Industries Pure.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 20:52:00 -
[87]
Privateers may be doing for 0.0 what no amount of reward in 0.0 could have done. The normally risk averse are getting pushed out there by privateers.
That said, its up to CCP whether they think their vision is to hear people say: "Move to 0.0, its safer." - - -
These elite slaves are exceptionally well suited for physical labor. |

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 21:48:00 -
[88]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
How the hell are you qualified to dole out advice when you dont know my situation? Im sorry, you must know better than me how many kill/losses I have.
Just becuase I don't like the Privteers abuse of the wardec system does not mean i don't know how to PVP. That kind of assumption shows something about your thought process. Its a common argument and quite lame. There are PLENTY of kick ass PVPers that dont like the Privateer Alliance and this war abuse. So untill you want to give me some hard evidence as to who is good/bad at PVP versus who likes/dislikes this system, my advise to YOU is to think before you speak.
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
Eveyone is like.. "well go to WOW now".. LOL, the funny thing is thast with this abuse this game has BECOME like WOW.
Anyone wanna go on a raiding party in Jita?
I'm very sorry if I hit a nerve, but you're posting in this thread has sounded very much like the standard "I don't like non-consentual PvP" and "All PvPers are griefers".
Apparently you have a grudge against the Privateers, and you use these kind of threads to spew hatred against them. I'll tell you though, it looks pretty sad to me. Perhaps you should take it out in game instead? And about the "abuse of wardec system", would you care to tell me how deccing most of EvE is abusing? That's like saying mining a belt dry is abusing the mining system, or doing missions a whole day is abusing the mission running system. It just doesn't make sense.
As for "plenty of kick-ass PvPers", all I see complaining about the Privateers are carebears. I have yet to see a PvPer with any notoriety post negatively about the Privateers.
I think you need to get a grip, and realise that this is a game, and that if you don't have fun, for whatever reason, it's time to look for a new game. Privateers are here to stay. Even if they fall apart, someone else will walk in their footsteps. Get used to it.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

RevJim
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 22:12:00 -
[89]
Edited by: RevJim on 07/04/2007 22:15:10
Originally by: Sorted
Hey I remember you, I pwned your BS while you were mission running in Del, You took it like a man and congratualted me for scanning you down as I remmember- dont shame yourself by coming here to whine.
Incidently after pwning missions runners in Del for a few weeks I guess I over stayed my welcome, and on a slow day I was setup and ganked.
Privateers isnt risk free - and neither is being in any player organisation. I would be happy to tell you how to avoid getting pwn'd in missions, how to dodge gate camps etc. It does mean you cant AFK missions/Fly afk etc and it will take more effort than not being at war...but its up to you. You can take the easy route and drop your corp - or get in touch, get some free tips and learn how to avoid unwanted PVP.
sorted
Respect to Sorted, I was impressed by your scanning ability, I have those skills trained to 4-5, triangulation etc etc. but can hardly find my a$$  I am avoiding unwanted PVP I am dropping to a noob corp, and I wasn't afk, just set up for npc not pvp and you didn't appear on overview either, a slight bug I have since fixed, seems that certain ships and states are default off, happened in that last patch.
RevJim Edit follows. As well as dropping to a noob corp, I am also cutting down the time I spend on here, the fun has gone from the game for me.
|

Adelorae24
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 22:43:00 -
[90]
I'd just like to go on record as saying that I have a deep affection for carebears. If it wasn't for their endless moaning about wanting to be left alone, I wouldn't get so much enjoyment from this game. There are many ways to avoid being ganked, but instead of learning them, the carebears go right on making the mistakes that get them popped. How about this... Don't jetcan mine, and if you do and still want to avoid problems don't shoot at me when I flip your can. Actually I would really prefer it if you did shoot. More fun that way. I guess what I'm saying is... It's your stupid mistakes that get you blown up. Don't blame us because you just can't keep your finger off the F1 key. |
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 22:50:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Ki An
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
How the hell are you qualified to dole out advice when you dont know my situation? Im sorry, you must know better than me how many kill/losses I have.
Just becuase I don't like the Privteers abuse of the wardec system does not mean i don't know how to PVP. That kind of assumption shows something about your thought process. Its a common argument and quite lame. There are PLENTY of kick ass PVPers that dont like the Privateer Alliance and this war abuse. So untill you want to give me some hard evidence as to who is good/bad at PVP versus who likes/dislikes this system, my advise to YOU is to think before you speak.
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
Eveyone is like.. "well go to WOW now".. LOL, the funny thing is thast with this abuse this game has BECOME like WOW.
Anyone wanna go on a raiding party in Jita?
I'm very sorry if I hit a nerve, but you're posting in this thread has sounded very much like the standard "I don't like non-consentual PvP" and "All PvPers are griefers".
Apparently you have a grudge against the Privateers, and you use these kind of threads to spew hatred against them. I'll tell you though, it looks pretty sad to me. Perhaps you should take it out in game instead? And about the "abuse of wardec system", would you care to tell me how deccing most of EvE is abusing? That's like saying mining a belt dry is abusing the mining system, or doing missions a whole day is abusing the mission running system. It just doesn't make sense.
As for "plenty of kick-ass PvPers", all I see complaining about the Privateers are carebears. I have yet to see a PvPer with any notoriety post negatively about the Privateers.
I think you need to get a grip, and realise that this is a game, and that if you don't have fun, for whatever reason, it's time to look for a new game. Privateers are here to stay. Even if they fall apart, someone else will walk in their footsteps. Get used to it.
/Ki
OHHHHH.. so I see.. Hmm.. Can you find where in my posts I said i was AGAINST consentual PVP... Please can you find it?
. . . OK. Now that is settled.
Not all PVPers are griefers.. I am a PVPer. Privateers just happen to be the only ones doing what they are doing, but it could be any alliance doing the same thing.....
However, please NOTE: no one else has started doing this. Its not this incredible revolution. Its just an annoyance. And in my opinion the excessive wardecs reduces the diversity of the game. I am not saying get rid of non-consentual PVP, I was never against wardecs before this spectacle and I am still not against it, but for crying out loud.. give it a break.
You are right about onwe thing though, this is a game and if I dont like it anymore i can leave. I was just upset there were no more unique games out there.
|

Timebomb
The Phoenix Mercenaries The Cartel.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 22:53:00 -
[92]
Ki An, go spam another thread, your posts justify nothing other than your own ego.
I will hold my comment of the privateers as it will probably be snipped, however its a dam shame when they dec real PvPers (4th time for us now i think) and then logoffski/dockupski/log-on trapski etc etc.
If CCP have any sense they will put an end to the privateers. ----------------------
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:01:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Timebomb Ki An, go spam another thread, your posts justify nothing other than your own ego.
I will hold my comment of the privateers as it will probably be snipped, however its a dam shame when they dec real PvPers (4th time for us now i think) and then logoffski/dockupski/log-on trapski etc etc.
If CCP have any sense they will put an end to the privateers.
I take it we have another hater then?
Oh, yes. All Privateers loggoffski and whatnot, because, really, they are afraid of you. They dec you, but they don't really want to be at war with you, because you are a l33t PvPer, and they're not.
Once again, I've yet to see a PvPer with any notoriety have anything bad to say about the Privateers.
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Gladia Horusthu
Gallente Anything Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:17:00 -
[94]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
OHHHHH.. so I see.. Hmm.. Can you find where in my posts I said i was AGAINST consentual PVP... Please can you find it?
. . . OK. Now that is settled.
Not all PVPers are griefers.. I am a PVPer. Privateers just happen to be the only ones doing what they are doing, but it could be any alliance doing the same thing.....
However, please NOTE: no one else has started doing this. Its not this incredible revolution. Its just an annoyance. And in my opinion the excessive wardecs reduces the diversity of the game. I am not saying get rid of non-consentual PVP, I was never against wardecs before this spectacle and I am still not against it, but for crying out loud.. give it a break.
Don't get me wrong, I have sympathy for people, this kind of game play can get old after a while, particulary if it isn't one's preferred mode of game play. HOWEVER, Privateers did NOT pioneer this kind of gameplay, they merely systematized what others (and probably constituent members) have been doing for years. Wardecs have long been issued against empire-based corps, often for ransom (something that was specifically supported, I might add), often when they did something like put up a POS or something else that attracted attention. Maybe it was just for smacking or suspected scamming, or connection of one or more members to another enemy group. Or just perceived weakness and too many assets. Fact is, though, Privateers only do what others before have done, except they are honest about their reason for existence. They advertise their wardeccing potential for mercenary contracts in other forums, and are far from the only mercs. They are simply the cheapest.
If I was an industrial corp competing with a bigger corp for belts in a system, I'd lay out the ISK for Privateers to dec 'em, and probably keep it up till they either left the system. I don't care if the larger corp can't defend itself, THOSE ARE MY ROCKS, and they will have to fight for it, even if it involves fighting through proxies. That is the essence of Eve. As an Empire hugger, Privateers DOES serve a purpose, imo. And they invented neither the purpose nor the mechanism.
Of course I am not addressing the wardecs against the allian-- wait, yeah I am. Perhaps it's just payback for all the digs that many (NOT all) deep space types send the direction of empire-based organizations. Life can be just as dangerous and a lot less rational in Empire than in 0.0 You want your little zones of safety, ironically enough they aren't in Empire. Yes, in past lives I have participated in alliances, and they are fun in their own right. I'm just saying that what Privateers does can fit a purpose, and a weapon for those who pay attention.
|
|

BH Runner
ISD BH Interstellar Services Department

|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:24:00 -
[95]
This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
[Bug Report Here] - [Contact Us] |
|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:42:00 -
[96]
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
What ? Whats has>? point me to someplace to read about it pls,...what am I missing????
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|

Darius silverbolt
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:48:00 -
[97]
So I am going to be that "guy" who asked that lame question.
What the heck is the problem with privateers all about? I am a empire player in a small dead corp. I don't see any problems to what i am reading. Can some one please just lay it out for this un-informed miner.
|

Adelorae24
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:51:00 -
[98]
Originally by: Darius silverbolt So I am going to be that "guy" who asked that lame question.
What the heck is the problem with privateers all about? I am a empire player in a small dead corp. I don't see any problems to what i am reading. Can some one please just lay it out for this un-informed miner.
Where do you mine exactly???
Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -HornFrog ([email protected]) |

Darius silverbolt
|
Posted - 2007.04.07 23:59:00 -
[99]
mostly in 1.0 and .9 space to avoid rats.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 00:07:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
What ? Whats has>? point me to someplace to read about it pls,...what am I missing????
yeah thats what I want to know
TO THE TEST SERVER!
|
|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 00:10:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
What ? Whats has>? point me to someplace to read about it pls,...what am I missing????
yeah thats what I want to know
TO THE TEST SERVER!
Just got back from there - ... PRiavteers doesnt have an allaince on the test server - and I am not familiar enough with the Corp deccing proceudre to know if its different.
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 00:15:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
What ? Whats has>? point me to someplace to read about it pls,...what am I missing????
yeah thats what I want to know
TO THE TEST SERVER!
Just got back from there - ... PRiavteers doesnt have an allaince on the test server - and I am not familiar enough with the Corp deccing proceudre to know if its different.
form a corp go to war hurry we must know!
|

Izzy Pol
Fear and Loathing in LoneTrek
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 00:19:00 -
[103]
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
That wasn't very informative.
|

Vicious Phoenix
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 00:54:00 -
[104]
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
What issue? There is no issue. If Privateers can shoot 69 assorted corps/alliances then those 69 corps/alliances can shoot them. Privateers should be a pile of molten goo right now.
CFW (Certified Forum Warrior) I kill people ingame too. |

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 01:03:00 -
[105]
Linkage I've opened up votes on war deccing 6 corps on the test server if anything is odd about that screen shot please inform me as I haven't war dec'd anyone before
|

Vicious Phoenix
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 01:28:00 -
[106]
Hmmm, I think that means they've made it cost more per dec so you can't have mass amount of wars going without paying heavily for it. Though I'm not sure.
CFW (Certified Forum Warrior) I kill people ingame too. |

Marquis Dean
The Last Thing You'll Ever See
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 01:36:00 -
[107]
Is this the death of PRVTR?
That makes me a very sad panda. 
---
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait will explain when i have the time i promise
|

Xiao Up
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 01:47:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Karasuma Akane Edited by: Karasuma Akane on 07/04/2007 09:09:14
Originally by: Ki An
Note, these wars may have changed in the time it took me to write this.

Thank you for the list and providing some sort of a factual breakdown of the wardecs. Now I'm just puzzled as to how Privateers have gotten their negative reputation (as expressed all over the forums) and caused so much anti-buzz if operations are truly this aligned toward targeting 0.0 alliances?
There's apparently a perception problem somewhere that's giving Privateers bad public relations. Maybe you need better publicity for the claims that Bangoura added above.
[p.s. - FarScape, I have no idea how you misunderstood my quoted line to mean big alliances when the sentence referred to small carebear corps.]
I know it's been a few pages since the parent posted, but I wanted to respond:
For the record, I think that the Privateers are overall not good for eve. I think that part of what made this game great was that there was the part of the game where people could play safe, play politics and robber baron in empire, and basically not have to worry about being attacked. Some people just want to be the armor crafter and shopkeeper.
But, I think a lot of the reason that the Privateers are getting so much flack on the forum is due to two things.
1.) the fact that they war-dec any high-sec young industrialist corps. It's a low blow, I'm not denying that, but it is legal. Whatever.
2.) 0.0 alliance member forum-alts who complain. And this point, I think has some reason behind it. People who live in 0.0 live in constant thrills and fears of invasion, conquest, and pvp at any moment. These people go to empire to buy stuff for pvp to bring to 0.0, and to relax and get away for a while, maybe tend to their research, or to run some lvl 4 missions to relax, etc.
So, to some people, old schoolers I guess, an empire war-dec is a big deal, it signifies a mortal enemy saying "we're going to chase you into empire and kill you there, too". But, a privateer war dec is different - they're saying "we have no reason to hate you, we are just going to show up in the middle of your Mediterranean cruise and kick you in the nuts because we can". I mean, it's like shipping out on active duty to a war zone, then coming home to see your family for 3 weeks, and all of a sudden, someone leaves flaming bags of dog crap on your front porch.
Personally, I'm torn in a way. I want there to be a "safe space" where people can both have a corporation (cause, social interaction *is* the game) and be safe from attack, but I recognize what the privateers do is legit. Part of me says people should adapt. Part of me says there needs to be a sandbox without pee in it.
|

Dave White
The Kennels
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 02:02:00 -
[109]
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.

|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 02:06:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Thread Winner Linkage I've opened up votes on war deccing 6 corps on the test server if anything is odd about that screen shot please inform me as I haven't war dec'd anyone before
The text in the Dec information box shows it is scalable based on the targets non mutal- it have been like that on TQ for as long as I have played. I dont know if there are any changes to the Alliance War Decing system though.
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|
|

Troy Knight
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 02:19:00 -
[111]
Hmm..alot of complaining here about this.
My question is:
How come nobody thought about doing what the Privateers are doing before? Its like a light bulb lit above the privateers heads and all of Empire moaned at once.
|

Captain Thunk
Captain Morgan Society
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 02:34:00 -
[112]
Edited by: Captain Thunk on 08/04/2007 02:34:13 Then CCP should add a big red button top right hand of the screen.
When pressed this button should render the pilot totally invulnerable regardless of whether he's in 0.0, low sec or high sec empire - a bright sign should appear above the pilots ship reading "I don't feel like fighting right now"
There is a lot of misinformation regarding privateers and what they do, I'm not saying there aren't a few who camp Jita 4-4 all day, as there clearly are. But there are many who believe each and every single privateer only engages ships 10:1 that have no weapons and runs the second a gun is fired in anger in their direction. If people wish to believe that, then that's fine, but I don't think posting such nonsense and stating it's a fact on these forums is at all helpful.
Generally speaking, privateers only targets large alliances on the principle of gaining as many targets as feasible. Unless specifically hired, there's no reason for us to attack a small industrial corp - it'd make no sense from our point of view in paying the fee for a very small number of pilots. Whoever hires privateers to grief these people would be paying someone to do it whether or not privateers existed. The vast majority of small corps aren't on the privateer radar and most people are well aware of this fact but are choosing to ignore it to try and remedy their own situation.
Ultimately, the people complaining the loudest want their cake and eat it. They want to be a 'powerful 0.0 entity, shaping the Eve universe in the most manly way' while convenient and then on the otherhand be a peaceful happy-afk-lucky industrialist making a lot of money in Empire when 0.0 is not so convenient. The simple fact is that many of these alliances are not as '0.0 based' as they wish people to believe, something that privateers has been exposing for some time.
I'm off the opinion that 2 week old players have no place in alliances, they have so much to learn about the game and would be better off in a smaller corp learning the basics. Being in a 0.0 alliance may benefit them financially, but they're side stepping part of the important learning process. For this reason I am not overly sympathetic for their plight, no more than I would be if they got ganked in some 0.0 region. That said, I've had two engagements with Ivy League gangs who show up their '0.0 poweful alliance' peers with their attitude and fun spirit. Not only do they actively hunt privateers, they also put up a good fight and shrug the losses off with a positive attitude. I don't think these 'newbs' are losing anything in their experience with privateers and are instead harnassing what the opportunity has brought them.
I think the real problem some people are having with privateers is that it's showing up people who have no real place in an alliance, they're not interested in taking part in their alliance and their alliance has no interest in protecting them in Empire while they do their own thing.
If the privateer alliance is about to be CCP'd then I'll settle on having had a good time, but I'd much rather CCP spent time solving the Logoff problems, explaining patiently - like a mother to a child - the problems that can occur when Devs/GMs/Events organisers get too close to the community as well as countless other outstanding issues than pandering to a small section of the community fixated with bending Eve to their vision rather than finding their own niche within the universe.
As far as I know there are only 3 people who have any say in Privateer Alliance direction, I am not one of them so my views may not be fully representative of the Alliance all the time.
CAPTAIN THUNK
Captain Morgan Society - Dedicated to rehabilitating the Teetotal. |

Apollyon X
FIRMA Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 03:02:00 -
[113]
It can be troublesome but I enjoy the danger of privateers. It makes empire feel like one big 0.0 npc region with no bubbles.
|

Tachuro Otapaku
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 03:13:00 -
[114]
Given the number of battles my corp, Eve University, has had with the Privateers recently, they do not solely gank haulers. I'm sure some of their members may, but a lot of them, specifically a couple corps within, just want to battle. There have been victories and losses on both sides, with pretty well every class of ship, excepting capital ships and titans, of course.
I can't say I agree with the whole randomly declaring wars thing - I'm a miner, and my skills are mostly mining/building =/ I guess it would be different if I had a few more combat skills, as well as available time.
|

ElweSingollo
The Vanyar
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 03:33:00 -
[115]
Originally by: Kodiak31415
Originally by: Barbarellas Daughter Getting shot with black screen is petitionable. Petitions are annoying, but at least the loss is compensated.
I dont know how many black screen killmails privs get, but its sad they spam their killboard with these mails. The ship gets reimbursed, so why post the mail?
IIRC aren't you invincible or at least unlockable untill about 20 seconds after undock? Unless theres lag or your have a slow computer you should load up long before this. Also this time is the same as the 'redock' timer meaning that so long as your dont activate a module or attempt to move your can instantly redock (attmpting to redock will cancel this timer)...but then again I may just be full of it.
doesn't account for being bumped 10k from the station while in your "20 sec invuln" timer though
CCP and Eve Online... It's not a bug, it's a feature
|

Rose Deathscythe
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 03:34:00 -
[116]
Can say from first hand experiance that the privateers do disrupt gameplay. The people who are hurt are those that have to operate in empire space, namley newer players. I can say they made the first couple months in my corp a unfun experiance due to constantly being ambushed while simply trying to run missions. Its not like they make an effort not to target newer players and focus on high value targets, instead they shoot at anything that can be shot which ends up being lower skilled and equiped players. Ultimatley I'm fine with wardecs as a concept, but an allaince should be limited to 4 or 5 wardecs max to keep allainces fighting battles that are really important, not just convienent.
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 13:36:00 -
[117]
Originally by: Captain Thunk Edited by: Captain Thunk on 08/04/2007 02:34:13 Then CCP should add a big red button top right hand of the screen.
When pressed this button should render the pilot totally invulnerable regardless of whether he's in 0.0, low sec or high sec empire - a bright sign should appear above the pilots ship reading "I don't feel like fighting right now"
There is a lot of misinformation regarding privateers and what they do, I'm not saying there aren't a few who camp Jita 4-4 all day, as there clearly are. But there are many who believe each and every single privateer only engages ships 10:1 that have no weapons and runs the second a gun is fired in anger in their direction. If people wish to believe that, then that's fine, but I don't think posting such nonsense and stating it's a fact on these forums is at all helpful.
Generally speaking, privateers only targets large alliances on the principle of gaining as many targets as feasible. Unless specifically hired, there's no reason for us to attack a small industrial corp - it'd make no sense from our point of view in paying the fee for a very small number of pilots. Whoever hires privateers to grief these people would be paying someone to do it whether or not privateers existed. The vast majority of small corps aren't on the privateer radar and most people are well aware of this fact but are choosing to ignore it to try and remedy their own situation.
Ultimately, the people complaining the loudest want their cake and eat it. They want to be a 'powerful 0.0 entity, shaping the Eve universe in the most manly way' while convenient and then on the otherhand be a peaceful happy-afk-lucky industrialist making a lot of money in Empire when 0.0 is not so convenient. The simple fact is that many of these alliances are not as '0.0 based' as they wish people to believe, something that privateers has been exposing for some time.
I'm off the opinion that 2 week old players have no place in alliances, they have so much to learn about the game and would be better off in a smaller corp learning the basics. Being in a 0.0 alliance may benefit them financially, but they're side stepping part of the important learning process. For this reason I am not overly sympathetic for their plight, no more than I would be if they got ganked in some 0.0 region. That said, I've had two engagements with Ivy League gangs who show up their '0.0 poweful alliance' peers with their attitude and fun spirit. Not only do they actively hunt privateers, they also put up a good fight and shrug the losses off with a positive attitude. I don't think these 'newbs' are losing anything in their experience with privateers and are instead harnassing what the opportunity has brought them.
I think the real problem some people are having with privateers is that it's showing up people who have no real place in an alliance, they're not interested in taking part in their alliance and their alliance has no interest in protecting them in Empire while they do their own thing.
If the privateer alliance is about to be CCP'd then I'll settle on having had a good time, but I'd much rather CCP spent time solving the Logoff problems, explaining patiently - like a mother to a child - the problems that can occur when Devs/GMs/Events organisers get too close to the community as well as countless other outstanding issues than pandering to a small section of the community fixated with bending Eve to their vision rather than finding their own niche within the universe.
As far as I know there are only 3 people who have any say in Privateer Alliance direction, I am not one of them so my views may not be fully representative of the Alliance all the time.
CAPTAIN THUNK
No misinformation.. the system is just lame.. there is nothing complicated about it.
|

Pan Crastus
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 13:50:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Barbarellas Daughter
Getting shot with black screen is petitionable. Petitions are annoying, but at least the loss is compensated.
No it isn't, the stuff looted by the exploiters is gone and won't be given back.
|

Pan Crastus
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 13:55:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
And tell me another thing.. why the HELL should I have to join a NPC corp to "deal" with the Privateer alliance.
Isn't EVE about PLAYER BASED CORPS!!!!!!!!
No, EVE in 2007 is all about fighting exploits with metagaming and vice versa ...
|

djenghis jan
Amarr Debiloff
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 14:18:00 -
[120]
The problem is not the privateers abuse of the war dec system, its in the war dec system itself. If you have an empire war you can gank people everywhere in empire and at the same time are able to dock everywhere. I think that wardeccing should be confined to constellations or even systems and not whole empire so that its more about territorial control than just ganking
|
|

Mistica
Cirrius Technologies O X I D E
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 14:49:00 -
[121]
Originally by: djenghis jan The problem is not the privateers abuse of the war dec system, its in the war dec system itself. If you have an empire war you can gank people everywhere in empire and at the same time are able to dock everywhere. I think that wardeccing should be confined to constellations or even systems and not whole empire so that its more about territorial control than just ganking
This is an interesting concept! Wardecs okay, but limit it to indeed systems or constellations. Very good point! -
Dream As You Will Live Forever... Live As You Will Die Today!!! :D |

Era Castor
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 14:58:00 -
[122]
This wont change anything concerning privateers as they already limit themselves stationwise. Jita 4-4 
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 15:07:00 -
[123]
Originally by: djenghis jan The problem is not the privateers abuse of the war dec system, its in the war dec system itself. If you have an empire war you can gank people everywhere in empire and at the same time are able to dock everywhere. I think that wardeccing should be confined to constellations or even systems and not whole empire so that its more about territorial control than just ganking
Are you sure you don't see a tiny problem with this being implemented in a game with non-consentual PvP?
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Captain Thunk
Captain Morgan Society
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 16:44:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
No misinformation.. the system is just lame.. there is nothing complicated about it.
Hi Jack, you've been a member of State War Academy for 3 years 6 months and 4 days, since when have you been affected by any war dec at all? 
I don't think you're in a position to comment on something you have absolutely no understanding of, other than reading the very misinformation I was talking about.
CAPTAIN THUNK
Captain Morgan Society - Dedicated to rehabilitating the Teetotal. |

Roue
Alcoholics R' Us
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 17:08:00 -
[125]
Originally by: Era Castor This wont change anything concerning privateers as they already limit themselves stationwise. Jita 4-4 
I hope you aren't serious. I despise JITA. As does probably 95% of privateers if I were to "guess". But I'm sure if you wanted to make claims you could browse our kill boards and look at where the activity is centered. not majoritily in JITA I'd be willing to bet.
And even if it is higher in jita then other places, though not where any but a small portion of us go. That would still make sense. Does the lion scour the wastelands or the oasis for gazelle? give.. me.. a... break...
This is my opinion not that of privateer corp, alliance, its member corps, affiliates, minions, pet animals, ex girlfriends, former roommates, 3rd grade gym teachers, late relatives, ontime relatives, |

Cleptopatra
Amarr Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 17:13:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Roue I hope you aren't serious. I despise JITA. As does probably 95% of privateers if I were to "guess". But I'm sure if you wanted to make claims you could browse our kill boards and look at where the activity is centered. not majoritily in JITA I'd be willing to bet.
And even if it is higher in jita then other places, though not where any but a small portion of us go. That would still make sense. Does the lion scour the wastelands or the oasis for gazelle? give.. me.. a... break...
From your killboards.. In the top 10 category... Under Systems... Drumroll please... #1 System is Jita with 4915 kills. #2 is Amarr with 1525. lol. Yeah, you don't spend much time in Jita. |

Operative 27B
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 18:32:00 -
[127]
To the OP: If you can't beat 'em, join 'em!
|

Raskil
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 20:10:00 -
[128]
I really wish I had time to reply to every post on here.
EVE is not all PVP and my gun is bigger than your gun. Look a little deeper, EVE is Mining, missions, exploration, POS building. So many more things. Just because I cannot WTFPWN someone in 1v1 combat does not mean I have to go play another game.
I am a Miner by trade, sure I have some PVP skills, but thats not what I play EVE for. I maintain POS Equipment, and mine, and manufacture. I work so all my buddies can go out and fight meaningful wars in 0.0 without worrying about the homefront.
In short, CAREBEARS make PVP possible. There are very few people I have met that have a passion for both industry and PVP. Now most of the people complaning about the Privateers are those industrial people. They get escorts to the edge of 0.0 and when they enter empire they used to be safe to go about their business until they needed to return to 0.0 with their goods. Now they can no longer do that with Privateers. Sure I could get a gang to escort me into JITA, but then the Privateers will just hide like cowards until they no longer want to escort me. The reason they wont want to escort me is that there are better and more meaningful fights out in true 0.0. The Privateer wars are just annoying as hell and making the game much harder. You cant get rid of them either, even if all the alliances joined together and made one "Privateer Hell Week" as one poster put it, they would just hide like cowards until it was over. They are like roaches that cannot be exterminated.
The spirit of my orignial post was that CONCORD is supposed to defend the space lanes and make them peaceful. Sure a war encounter every now and then but... come on 143 wars or something like that? it does not take a freaking idiot to see that this is legalized piracy. In the spirit of the game, shouldnt CONCORD do something.
Now I can find ways around privateers. You can get an alt trained up in hauling, dont even need a second account and use him to haul.
You can get a gang ot come with you and hunt them for a bit until they hide
You can warp around them while they camp station undock lag and bumping and act like you are making sniper points.
You can come back and actually snipe with those points
Get in intys and pester them with fast fly bys
This is all fun but like I said before, its not in the spirit of the game, in my opinion. I find it funny how many of you say you are not secure in "HISEC". Think about that word. High Security Space. Security of what? How is it any different than 0.0 now in terms of PVP combat.
Well in Empire I have to contend with not only ganks at every corner but lag and undock bumping.
So enough rambling and complaining. How could the wardec system be changed to prevent legalized piracy.
I think a limit on wars, X number allowed is too strict
One poster siad something along the lines of a doubling system for every war. The price doubles for every additional war, making numerous wars unreasonably expensive.
I am surprised at how quickly this thread has grown. Much flaming but I can look past that fairly easily. Perhaps we could all get good ideas out of this and not just "WELL GO SHOOT THEM". As I see it now, this is a great idea on the Privateers part, and not one that will just go away without a change to the game mechanics themselves.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 20:46:00 -
[129]
The problem isn't the wardec its the lacking of other elements of war.
Embarago's Pulling Diplomatic Strings Blockades or the old fashioned genocide technique thanks to the jove and their capsule technologies.
Empire war is different than 0.0 war as you can't really stop a corp just annoy them.
|

R3dSh1ft
Caldari FIRMA Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 20:49:00 -
[130]
My personal problem with this is that a corp can leave privis to regen itself (creating an annoying alliance mail everytime!) but basically it means in order for all the ppl who were at war with them to be able to continue fighting them ( i think 50 active wars atm) the alliances/organisations in question would each need to spend 50m isk which means its unreasonable.
at the moment war is too easy to step into and out of as part of an alliance. I think to make it less exploitable, an alliance war should continue on for a corp that leaves it for a period of a week, not a day. ______________________________________
|
|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 20:53:00 -
[131]
Originally by: R3dSh1ft I think to make it less exploitable, an alliance war should continue on for a corp that leaves it for a period of a week, not a day.
/SINGED SINGED AND SIGNED AGAIN!!!!!!
woot! , can we get some support for this pls guys.. RALLY ROUND...
You have no idea how many carebare corps drop their allaince everytime we War Dec them...Remember people - it wasnt even us who suggested it!
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 21:59:00 -
[132]
Edited by: Spaceman Jack on 08/04/2007 22:09:22
Originally by: Captain Thunk Hi Jack, you've been a member of State War Academy for 3 years 6 months and 4 days, since when have you been affected by any war dec at all? 
I don't think you're in a position to comment on something you have absolutely no understanding of, other than reading the very misinformation I was talking about.
CAPTAIN THUNK
LOL.. OMG you ever stop to think I am an alt? HAHAHAHA
yes its an old alt.. my main is older and has been PVPing with player corps since beta so unless you can top that...
What.. that charachter of yours has been around for a ittle over a year, a month of it with the Privateers...lol.
And no, I don't post with my main, and no I have nothing to hide. But as you just prooved people read into the wrong things anyway so Id rather do it with my alt than get my corp/alliance into something simply becuase some shmuck came up with something on their own..
STOP... THINK...
|

BoBoZoBo
Foundation R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 22:07:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Thread Winner The problem isn't the wardec its the lacking of other elements of war.
Embarago's Pulling Diplomatic Strings Blockades or the old fashioned genocide technique thanks to the jove and their capsule technologies.
Empire war is different than 0.0 war as you can't really stop a corp just annoy them.
EXACTLY!...In a game like EVE, embargos and sanctions would work beautifully to... "advise" alliances against such tactics.
But as it stands there is no counter. And unfortunately the existance of alts leaves things like embragos and economic sanctions full of holes.
Either way I would still be for embargos. Hell, even if they can circumvent it with an alt.. at least it would be a pain in the arse for them as well. =========================
Minister of Propaganda - Operator 9 |

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 22:21:00 -
[134]
Originally by: BoBoZoBo
Originally by: Thread Winner The problem isn't the wardec its the lacking of other elements of war.
Embarago's Pulling Diplomatic Strings Blockades or the old fashioned genocide technique thanks to the jove and their capsule technologies.
Empire war is different than 0.0 war as you can't really stop a corp just annoy them.
EXACTLY!...In a game like EVE, embargos and sanctions would work beautifully to... "advise" alliances against such tactics.
But as it stands there is no counter. And unfortunately the existance of alts leaves things like embragos and economic sanctions full of holes.
Either way I would still be for embargos. Hell, even if they can circumvent it with an alt.. at least it would be a pain in the arse for them as well.
Another problem with embargoes is that every one has the same technology available to them save capital ships but as the horrible future where Battle ship fleets soon become dread fleets become a reality the galactic arms race that started with the implementation of capitals and supercapitals there is no way to "control" a technological advancement thanks to invention. An embargo is impossible to achieve thanks to the isolationalistic(not a real word but it works here) nature of industrial corps.
Its mind boggling really gg ccp 
|

Fubarski
Caldari Centauri Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 23:24:00 -
[135]
If the privateers want to station camp, and kill folks who are still loading the zone, then here's a good solution...
Allow the activation of modules inside the station prior to undocking. Then when you undock, all activated modules are up and running. Allows someone with an active tank to actually get out of a camped station...
There you go. Empire based corps have a way out. It's called the Friend or Foe missile. Load up a bunch of cheap ships, insure them, activate your tanks, and FoF's and go out with a bang, instead of a blargh.
THAT's what needs to happen for the whole "fight back" b.s. tagline to be valid.
Fubar
|

Big Al
The Aftermath
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 23:30:00 -
[136]
The choice to dock at Jita 4-4 with a Privateers war is an IQ check. Sadly, many are failing.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.08 23:31:00 -
[137]
Originally by: Big Al The choice to dock at Jita 4-4 with a Privateers war is an IQ check. Sadly, many are failing.
QFMFT
|

Siege
Minmatar Siegecraft Bounty Hunting
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 00:06:00 -
[138]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack Edited by: Spaceman Jack on 08/04/2007 22:11:52
Originally by: Captain Thunk Hi Jack, you've been a member of State War Academy for 3 years 6 months and 4 days, since when have you been affected by any war dec at all? 
I don't think you're in a position to comment on something you have absolutely no understanding of, other than reading the very misinformation I was talking about.
CAPTAIN THUNK
LOL.. OMG you ever stop to think I am an alt? HAHAHAHA
yes its an old alt.. my main is older and has been PVPing with player corps since beta so unless you can top that...
What.. that character of yours has been around for a ittle over a year, a month of it with the Privateers...lol. But I wont make your mistake and assume that this is your only character.
And no, I don't post with my main, and no I have nothing to hide. But as you just prooved... people read into the wrong things anyway so Id rather do it with my alt than get my corp/alliance into something simply becuase some shmuck came up with something on their own..
STOP... THINK...
Lets not jump to bragging, unless you are going to be honest about it. Neither the database, nor any characters characters, were transferred over after the open Beta phase. Same at the end of pre-alpha and alpha.
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 00:28:00 -
[139]
I'm back and I'm in a Privateers thread. -
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait think the problem is found. last startup now.
|

Passcal
Darksaber Technologies FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 01:02:00 -
[140]
Originally by: J Valkor Privateer.
PRIVATEER
LEGALIZED PIRACY
PRIVATEER
Was that an "I'm a shark" reference?  [url=http://imageshack.us][img=http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/9620/496wx3.jpg][/url] |
|

Ushitako
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 01:17:00 -
[141]
I agree with the main comment in this thread. The main issue is not PA but the war dec system. It is not realistic to be at war with 50+ groups and still paying a more or less static amount of money for each of them. In theory and in practice, the more war you have the more strechted your corp and alliance should be. With making each war more and more costly, it would force PA to focus on valid target that want to fight. Also, war dec should be automatically cancelled if there is no destroyed target in the last 3 days that would force PA to hunt for its prey which are mostly composed of 0.0 alliances that you do not see so often in high sec.
Also, I am a carebear and there is no mechanism for me to punish the war dec. If i am in a corp, i really want to be able to select to whom I am trading with. So fair enough you are at war with a carebear alliance/corp but don't be surprised in Jita not being able to buy anything off the market so easily. I would really love to have a function that discrimate between buyers of my sell order so a friend get a discount. A neutral the standard price and the war target can't buy or buy at inflated price.
|

Aille Pluthrak
Caldari Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 01:49:00 -
[142]
I have no say in anything when it comes to The Privateers (other then where my ship goes on a given night). But if I were in charge and my costs of war decs go up for each War Dec I do I would start going down the following list to see who to War Dec to get Max Profit for: 1. Who do I see the most of in Empire? (I could care less if 0.0 Alliance or a Carebear Corp) 2. What type of ships will I get the most profit out of? (Who has the most haulers? Who has the best fitted ships?) 3. Who are the ones who do not learn from the War Decs?
Be carefull what you wish for when it comes to decreasing the number of War Decs that a certain Alliance can do cause it might just bite you in the rear. Who knows, the big mean people just might forget about going after the big bad 0.0 Alliance people and concentrate on the Lambs of Empire (AKA Carebear Corps and Alliances who reside in Empire).
Heck, decreasing the number of War Decs The Privateers can do just might make em leave Jita 4-4 and start flying around in 20 ship blobs thru Empire leaving Death and Destruction in their wake. I'd rather have em off of Jita 4-4 (or one of the other hubs) instead of wondering around Empire in a blob looking for those decreased number of War Targets. At least then I know where a majority of em are at.
But thats just me and I am not in charge. In the end I don't really care if the number of War Targets decrease. I will adapt. All part of the game. Who knows, maybe I will go back to mission running. Yeah, right. 
The above are just my opinions and nothing more. ---------------------- Boom goes the ship! Squish goes the pilot!
|

Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 02:00:00 -
[143]
Originally by: U****ako It is not realistic to be at war with 50+ groups and still paying a more or less static amount of money for each of them.
I generally do not shoot down comparisons of games to RL. But this is laughable.
Realistic? Realistic? Go outside. Get some perspective.
 -
Originally by: CCP Sharkbait think the problem is found. last startup now.
|

Gladia Horusthu
Gallente Anything Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 03:17:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Raskil
The spirit of my orignial post was that CONCORD is supposed to defend the space lanes and make them peaceful. Sure a war encounter every now and then but... come on 143 wars or something like that? it does not take a freaking idiot to see that this is legalized piracy. In the spirit of the game, shouldnt CONCORD do something.
You see, I have to disagree with this statement. CONCORD is there for one reason: if someone aggresses someone else in highsec, the agressor loses their ship. I have NEVER seen CCP say anything about CONCORD protecting players-- only exacting vengeance upon the aggressor. It is retributive justice, enforcing a social contract that minimizes conflict in highsec space., while allowing those willing to pay the man to pursue corporate ransoming.
Why is it that everyone thinks that Privateers is the first to do this? For years smaller corps have been fearful of a pvp corp wardeccing them. At least with Privateers you know that they aren't after you exclusively, and you can hire them to shoot your enemies. They make no bones about being a mercenary organization, they will wardec anybody if you come up with the ISK to pay them. The difference between MC and Privateers is a matter of scope-- MC confines themselves to specific contracts and guarantees results. Privateers shoots targets as convenient for them, but is infinitely (well not literally infinitely but you get the idea) cheaper.
Fact is, any good industrial corporation should right now be looking for ways to chase off competition for those precious belts in Empire space. If my corp was in mining instead of missionrunning (the only area of the game without competition-- something I'd like to see changed) I'd hire them in a heartbeat against every corporation mining in my belts. They are cheap, they have a towering reputation, and in the end they won't do too much actual damage, primarily scaring the other guys into leaving. Sure there will probably be a few ship losses, but that is war. I'd give the contract some kind of condition for nullifying the war, such as relocating operations to a different constellation or region.
You think these guys have no purpose in the game? As a miner, I would think you understand about competing for ore. The only thing that changed with Privateers is the cost of contracting a mercenary organization to shot your enemies, and for your enemies to contract them to shoot you. Entirely within the parameters and intentions of the game.
As for the reason it is called "HISEC" space, that is nomenclature adopted by the community based on whether CONCORD reacts or not in a given system. Above .4 there are two main differences between the different security levels: 1) speed at which CONCORD reacts, 2) resource distribution, including asteroids and rats. The term "hisec space" is a misnomer and always has been, and was introduced by players. But in reality, there is no safe space in Eve.
|

Gladia Horusthu
Gallente Anything Inc.
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 03:25:00 -
[145]
Originally by: BoBoZoBo
Originally by: Thread Winner The problem isn't the wardec its the lacking of other elements of war.
Embarago's Pulling Diplomatic Strings Blockades or the old fashioned genocide technique thanks to the jove and their capsule technologies.
Empire war is different than 0.0 war as you can't really stop a corp just annoy them.
EXACTLY!...In a game like EVE, embargos and sanctions would work beautifully to... "advise" alliances against such tactics.
But as it stands there is no counter. And unfortunately the existance of alts leaves things like embragos and economic sanctions full of holes.
Either way I would still be for embargos. Hell, even if they can circumvent it with an alt.. at least it would be a pain in the arse for them as well.
Sanctions are a joke, I don't think there's ever been an instance where this has proven to have been the deciding factor in rl politics. Specifics are, of course, against the forum rules, but economic options such as sanctions simply do not work in rl. Alliances have permanent sanctions that they place on one another-- how many actively trade with other alliances? That would require a cancellation of the NBSI policy that is adopted almost universally. Some blocs of alliances work with one another, but they all use economic sanctions already against their enemies. And with market neutrality in place (ie all orders are anonymous until the transaction takes place) in Empire space there is no mechanism for that in cases where the Privateers would otherwise be contracted against another corp.
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 03:40:00 -
[146]
Originally by: Siege Lets not jump to bragging, unless you are going to be honest about it. Neither the database, nor any characters characters, were transferred over after the open Beta phase. Same at the end of pre-alpha and alpha.
Yes is correct, let me be more specifice in saying that I, the human player BEHIND all thos characters, has been PVPing since beta in player corps...better?
But I think you get where i am coming from.
The point was not to assume exactly WHAT people know and dont know about this game just based on the caracter they are posting with or what they are posting about.
Anywhoo... this is off topic.
Reading the above about economic sanctions bring up a good point.
Lets look at this from the roll playing perspective that EVE tries to emulate political, economic and military powers. Its is hard to beleive that the Empire governments would allow such blatant abuses of the war systen in effect threatening the econimic back bone of the empire.
One could easily say (that as in real political process) one of the first things the political environment would do to persuade an abusive military power to stop doing what it is doind is to impose a blockade or economic sanction.
However, there is no mechanism in game for that, and even if there were, alts could circumvent it.
You want PVP, how about some econimoc PVP, but we dont have that capability. So war dec limits would act in place of econimic dissuasion.
|

Cindare
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 04:04:00 -
[147]
Don't you folks see the valuable service that PA provides? These guys were kind enough to expedite my podjump from Jita back to 0.0 in record time! And they pay for the priviledge; I wouldn't have it any other way.
Grats on the shuttle killmail, by the way. 
<3 PA
|

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 06:41:00 -
[148]
Originally by: BH Runner This issue has already been dealt with. Its on the test server, it hasn't reached TQ deployment yet. Review it on the test server please.
Has anyone managed to figure out what BH Runner means ? been trying a few things out on test server but i don't see anything different ?
|

SiJira
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 07:51:00 -
[149]
Originally by: Raskil
The spirit of my orignial post was that CONCORD is supposed to defend the space lanes and make them peaceful. Sure a war encounter every now and then but... come on 143 wars or something like that? it does not take a freaking idiot to see that this is legalized piracy. In the spirit of the game, shouldnt CONCORD do something.
Concord more like local militia that has representatives from all the empires. Until players start attacking empire stations and the planets around them they wont really care about war decs :)
|

Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 08:02:00 -
[150]
Edited by: Venkul Mul on 09/04/2007 07:58:30
Originally by: Xiao Up
Personally, I'm torn in a way. I want there to be a "safe space" where people can both have a corporation (cause, social interaction *is* the game) and be safe from attack, but I recognize what the privateers do is legit. Part of me says people should adapt. Part of me says there needs to be a sandbox without pee in it.
/signed
The best summing up of my feeling for Privateers I have ever see. 
I would like a differentiation between war declaration and semi-legalized pirating in high sec (something that should be feasible, but the current form of war dec is a farce in that).
|
|

SFShootme
The Carebear Stare Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 08:09:00 -
[151]
Originally by: Sorted
Originally by: R3dSh1ft I think to make it less exploitable, an alliance war should continue on for a corp that leaves it for a period of a week, not a day.
/SINGED SINGED AND SIGNED AGAIN!!!!!!
woot! , can we get some support for this pls guys.. RALLY ROUND...
You have no idea how many carebare corps drop their allaince everytime we War Dec them...Remember people - it wasnt even us who suggested it!
/signed!!!
---- Tho shall give Life, for Life. |

Fujin Ryoushi
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 09:31:00 -
[152]
So.. can PA be 'rented' to wardec someone? and most importantly, how much would it cost? 
|

Sorted
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 10:16:00 -
[153]
Originally by: Fujin Ryoushi So.. can PA be 'rented' to wardec someone? and most importantly, how much would it cost? 
Yes, very much so. Some allainces have paid us to keep their enemies perma deced. some carebares have paid us to dec empire based pvp corps who keep harashing them (irony? incidently in once such instance I delt with the PVP corp surrenderd to the carebear corp provided he would get us to retract, which we did as it was his ISK after all).
Price is the war dec cost for concord (we are a non-profit Alliance) Prices start @ 50M/Week and are scaleable depending on the number of active wars the target already has.
Contact me for a price check
Sorted
Learn More: Privateers Recruitment
|

Cipher7
Sebiestor tribe
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 10:30:00 -
[154]
People whine about Privateers because most 0.0 alliances are carebears.
Nobody likes risk, if thats carebear then %90 of Eve players are carebear, because we all like to avoid risk.
I think Privateers are providing a valuable service for Eve.
This service is twofold.
1) Helping the devs understand what 0.0 feels like for the average player by bringing 0.0 into Empire.
2) Highlighting the gross inadequacies of the wardec system.
You say Eve is about choice, but is it really?
No its not, Eve has NO place for non-pvp players.
What Privateers is doing is making people understand that even PVP-oriented players need a place they can chill out a relax, mine, run some missions, make some money, trade and generally carebear it up and veg out.
Many ppl find Eve unplayable without 2 accts.
1 acct for pvp, 1 acct for carebearing.
Its kind of like a /pvp on/off switch.
I believe that this conversation is what Ziona intended when creating Privateers.
People told her to stop whining.
Now its YOUR turn to whine, suckers.
This is not a Privateers problem, this is a wardec system problem, this is a "the security system is broken" problem, where people need alts in scouts just to get from point A to point B.
How bout not NEEDING hauler alts?
How bout having other means of information gathering other than SPY ALTS?
How bout being able to see whats in the next system without having to TWO BOX?
How bout industry corps being able to do their thing without getting wardecced by griefer corps?
How bout having a game where everybody doesn't have to METAGAME around the broken mechanics?
I've been a longtime subscriber because I believe that CCP is building something great, and that the final product will be something totally unique and cool, like supporting an artist that's working on his masterpiece.
Is this your final vision CCP? Broken mechanics and Metagaming?
Eve is an awesome concept, but this game could have been so much more, its a shame we have to settle for a half-arsed shell of itself.
|

Logi3
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 10:39:00 -
[155]
I wonder how much the war decs cost? Im pretty sure there not costing 100k a week
Back to basics, back to pirating |

Kagura Nikon
Minmatar Guardians of the Dawn Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 10:40:00 -
[156]
Ok do anyoneknows what have been implemented in teh test server about this?
Damm I am the type of person that cannot sleep when this type of thing happen... " hey you saw what is new?.. naa I won't tell you"
If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough |

Rogain Shortshot
Amarr Viziam
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 11:08:00 -
[157]
This is the problems I see with Privateers,
1. They are everwhere... 2. They have war dec'd just about everyone... 3. They are in empire, just empire space... 4. They WILL KILL off the concept of corporations in Eve-online.
Really #4 is probably the one I worry about most...Only seen one privateer all weekend.
If you have massive Wardec's against all them alliances and corps, do you really think the corps will survive?
You dont need to be in the corp to play...the only thing you need a corp for really is for POS. Nothing else is needed, everything can be done as a solo player.
|

Roshan longshot
Gallente Ordos Humanitas FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 11:25:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Cipher7 People whine about Privateers because most 0.0 alliances are carebears.
Nobody likes risk, if thats carebear then %90 of Eve players are carebear, because we all like to avoid risk.
I think Privateers are providing a valuable service for Eve.
This service is twofold.
1) Helping the devs understand what 0.0 feels like for the average player by bringing 0.0 into Empire.
2) Highlighting the gross inadequacies of the wardec system.
You say Eve is about choice, but is it really?
No its not, Eve has NO place for non-pvp players.
What Privateers is doing is making people understand that even PVP-oriented players need a place they can chill out a relax, mine, run some missions, make some money, trade and generally carebear it up and veg out.
Many ppl find Eve unplayable without 2 accts.
1 acct for pvp, 1 acct for carebearing.
Its kind of like a /pvp on/off switch.
I believe that this conversation is what Ziona intended when creating Privateers.
People told her to stop whining.
Now its YOUR turn to whine, suckers.
This is not a Privateers problem, this is a wardec system problem, this is a "the security system is broken" problem, where people need alts in scouts just to get from point A to point B.
How bout not NEEDING hauler alts?
How bout having other means of information gathering other than SPY ALTS?
How bout being able to see whats in the next system without having to TWO BOX?
How bout industry corps being able to do their thing without getting wardecced by griefer corps?
How bout having a game where everybody doesn't have to METAGAME around the broken mechanics?
I've been a longtime subscriber because I believe that CCP is building something great, and that the final product will be something totally unique and cool, like supporting an artist that's working on his masterpiece.
Is this your final vision CCP? Broken mechanics and Metagaming?
Eve is an awesome concept, but this game could have been so much more, its a shame we have to settle for a half-arsed shell of itself.
Have you ever wondered why you have three toons per account? No they are not for forum whoring, but to be able to play three diffrent styles of play.
I turned off the second account, seemed like waste of time, and money to me. You got two other toons to play with anyway.
Free-form Professions, ensure no limetations on professions. Be a trader, fighter, industialist, researcher, hunter pirate or mixture of them all.
[i]As read from the original box.
|

EinaruS
Rage Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 11:32:00 -
[159]
i completely agree, declaring wars in empire should be forbidden, concord should start recruiting everyone and take over the low-sec killing all pirates and would be pvpers on sight, then move into 0.0 and basically raise the sec status in every single system in the game to 1.0. that way this legalized piracy would be at an end because it's just ridiculous that such violence should even exist. -
A finger...especially the middle one, is worth more than any amount of isk |

Roshan longshot
Gallente Ordos Humanitas FREGE Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 11:43:00 -
[160]
Originally by: EinaruS i completely agree, declaring wars in empire should be forbidden, concord should start recruiting everyone and take over the low-sec killing all pirates and would be pvpers on sight, then move into 0.0 and basically raise the sec status in every single system in the game to 1.0. that way this legalized piracy would be at an end because it's just ridiculous that such violence should even exist.
I hope this is a joke...sarcastic...or somthing. If not you dont belong here...oh....Can I have your stuff???
Free-form Professions, ensure no limetations on professions. Be a trader, fighter, industialist, researcher, hunter pirate or mixture of them all.
[i]As read from the original box.
|
|

Templer Relleg
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:03:00 -
[161]
Can anybody confirm that they have nerfed us?
If this happens, i sadly think this is gonna nerf eve alot for me. I cant be bothered with 0.0, so many blobs, so little solo pvp, and yet so little danger. If you go to empire while being in a large alliance, its the ultimate carebear situation. Your immortal to anything.
I think that privateers is a brilliant idea. I demand a devblog on this. Your screwing us over im afraid.
|

RevJim
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:17:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Templer Relleg
I cant be bothered with 0.0, so many blobs, so little solo pvp, and yet so little danger.
That made me spit my coffee! ROFL a Privateer talking about 1v1, the irony. (Rev grabs some kitchen roll to clean keyboard and screen dammit )
If you want solo pvp then Eve is not the place for you. I have only ever had one true solo pvp fight, Taranis vs. Taranis in 2 years of eve, many wars and lots of time in 0.0 have taught me that there is no such thing as 1v1 in Eve. Some days you are the blob, some days you are the blobee both boring to me, hence I am looking into other ways to gain enjoyment from this game rather than watch my ships explode.
Rev
|

Templer Relleg
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:21:00 -
[163]
Originally by: RevJim
Originally by: Templer Relleg
I cant be bothered with 0.0, so many blobs, so little solo pvp, and yet so little danger.
That made me spit my coffee! ROFL a Privateer talking about 1v1, the irony. (Rev grabs some kitchen roll to clean keyboard and screen dammit )
If you want solo pvp then Eve is not the place for you. I have only ever had one true solo pvp fight, Taranis vs. Taranis in 2 years of eve, many wars and lots of time in 0.0 have taught me that there is no such thing as 1v1 in Eve. Some days you are the blob, some days you are the blobee both boring to me, hence I am looking into other ways to gain enjoyment from this game rather than watch my ships explode.
Rev
Thats because you havent been in privateers. Plenty solo pvp(Some would call it gank, but meh). Sure, theres alot of, what some would call blobs. But i can actually fly around solo, and shoot at things. I might not get any mails whatsoever, but i get a damn rush from it!
I actually went to 0.0 yesterday alone. Worst experience to date. Sure, good rush from running warp bubbles and getting hunted by 100's of vagabonds(Theres damn many of them in 0.0 i tell you!). But its very blobby, laggy, not rewarding, etc. I earned more isk in privateers then i ever did pvp'ing in 0.0. And i pvp'ed quite alot.
|

Surreptitious
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:40:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Templer Relleg Can anybody confirm that they have nerfed us?
If this happens, i sadly think this is gonna nerf eve alot for me. I cant be bothered with 0.0, so many blobs, so little solo pvp, and yet so little danger. If you go to empire while being in a large alliance, its the ultimate carebear situation. Your immortal to anything.
I think that privateers is a brilliant idea. I demand a devblog on this. Your screwing us over im afraid.
I can't seem to find any information anywhere as well. If it is a stealthnerf then shame on CCP. If its not then shame on the ISD guy who posts random non-sensical information.
Unfortunately on the test server we arent yet an Alliance so no one can go on to test things. Theres nothing in the game dev forum, the idea forum or testing forum.
Like you I feel the same as do many in our alliance. For me personally this is the end of the EVE line. The day our alliance or chosen gameplay dies so do my toons. It would be sad to leave a game I've been playing for almost 4 years because the DEV's catered to the whiney carebears and stabbed a big group of PVP'rs in the back. Unfortunately that appears to be the path we are heading down.
If anyone from CCP reads this, can't you apprecaite how we have created a new avenue of gameplay for a huge segment of the population? Doesnt it strike you as being wrong to nerf a group who contributes to the game and story line in such a dramamtic fashion as we do. Instead your taking the side of a few whiney people who contribute nothing to your game other than a few loud forum threads?
I hope all this is just a nasty miscommunication because I just cant believe CCP would go against what they have stated all these years and make EVE "safe".
Syrup
|

djenghis jan
Amarr Debiloff
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:43:00 -
[165]
Maybe there is a middle ground here, the privateers want non consensual pvp but only on their terms. That's what everybody wants. Apparently they lack the cohesion? nerve? courage? to go to 0.0 Or maybe they like to be close to their industrial alts and the ease of fitting new ships without passing blob invested choke point systems.
For empire corps or alliances fighting the privateers is like suppressing a guerrilla faction, you just can't win in such a war. This makes it easy for privateers do to their thing.
So suppose we make the wardec pricing based on security rating and base it around constellations or factions. So NO wardec in 1.0, very expensive wardec in 0.9 , and cheap wardec in 0.4-0.1
Alternatively you could make the pricing standing dependent, so if you war in amarr space, your gallente standing is reduced so you can't wardec there. The standing of each member in the wardeccing corp is adjusted after the voting is passed.
|

HED GP
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 12:52:00 -
[166]
Originally by: EinaruS i completely agree, declaring wars in empire should be forbidden, concord should start recruiting everyone and take over the low-sec killing all pirates and would be pvpers on sight, then move into 0.0 and basically raise the sec status in every single system in the game to 1.0. that way this legalized piracy would be at an end because it's just ridiculous that such violence should even exist.
Your kidding me right ? So you want empire to be safe ground for all the new comers and 0.0 alliance so they can start putting theyr stuff on sell order and make empire a safe zone again... boring ... It was bad enough years back when ccp attacked piracy hard makeing sentrys from 60km to 160km..multiplating sentry's making it really hard nearly imposible to do any piracy at all still there are ppl left in that buisness and i soley gratulate them in every way keeping the good hard work of killing these cursed carebears a bit makeing atleast .4 - .1 a better place and more dangerous to live in.
But why the hell does empire have to be a bloody safe zone ?? Why wont CCP nerf 0.0 a little i mean comon i see that BOB and D2 take couple hundreds of ships with theyr titan you dont get much choice now if you wana enter 0.0 now days its either join either side and fight cause liveing peacefully in 0.0 is a deathwish really. So ofc ppl wana stay in a good little safe bubble in empire cause privateers are doomed no more wars so they can life in theyr safe zones and be safe and all cuddly .. Well ccp thanks a bunch for makeing eve a dull place again... I just wonder what will Privateers do if they actully nerd this wardec now ?
And where will they go will they stay intact and join other alliances in 0.0
Only thing i can tell you beeing in Privateers for 2months has made me love them alot more than i could think off theyr a great bunch its perfect alliacne to learn pvp. These guys learn to pvp solo than in small gangs most of these 0.0 lads dont know even how to fit theyr ships or to use them correctly.
Its a bloody shame if you ask me ccp allways think about theyr carebears not the whole comunity i mean how many alts are in privateers from bob, d2, -a- and so on alot more than you think. And those guys love shooting theyr own allies or just other guys i mean i even know couple of em and they love it.
Anyways perhaps im just babbling but i think if this goes out ill prolly quit eve again for good cant be arsed in only fighting these cursed blob wars of doom in 0.0 beeing slaughterd by a bloody titan in couple of sec's i would rather quit than do that again
Thanks CCP you ruined the game again... I'll just play with the fairy's in wow or something more fun than this cursed game.
|

groove
Gallente Thundercats
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:09:00 -
[167]
ohh yeah what Syrup said is true it seems you allways attack the pvpers in this game wasent this game made to let you explore and to fight and enjoy the game ?
Most guys that are in Privateers have been playing since the beging of eve and theyr hundreds of players that play with us that now finally enjoy eve more than before and again you are gonna take that away from them and those that actully like fighting privateers and perhaps havent seen this thread im not sure they will agree with you on this BS your making us read ...
But sure think about the little carebears as you allways do i got about 7 accounts in eve atm i will quit i cant be arsed playing or even paying for a game that kills all the fun and pvping in this game forces us to enter 0.0 so we can be blobbed warp bubbled and blown to ****tery in 0,0.
You should look at the bigger picture i have talked to some guys and many claim they will quit eve for good and we aint taklking 10 or so many have lots of accounts and alt all over you should really think about this before acting on this issue ...
nerf the wars to 50-60 not completly but hey your the nerf bosses of doom so yeah ruin the game and make way for carebears ... its your thing anyways.
try this than ,..... when you advertise eve...
Wellcome To EvE online the game of carebears step right up its a promise you can hug your roids till the day you die ! its a promise CCP, GM's ISD will take care of you as you where theyr own little baby's not even NPC's will be able to touch you in 1.0 - 0.5 its a Gurantee ! Step right up join THE SAFEST GAME AROUND !!
Cheer CCP you can use this as an advertise im sure it will be a good one... 
and ohh yeah i know you will delete this post but it was worth it ...
|

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:14:00 -
[168]
Instead of spreading FUD all around why dont we just wait for an official CCP response.
|

groove
Gallente Thundercats
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:21:00 -
[169]
well if we wont share our ideas and how stupit this all sounds they will do something really nasty to the pvp system in eve they have allways done that ...
I have playd this game since beta they allways follow the carebears allways have prolly allways will..
its a fact
|

Corporate Stooge
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:33:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Originally by: Azerrad InExile Or you could... fight back maybe?
Well, I never said that I did not.
I (my main) have quite often made good target practice of the Privateers, we have had some good battles.
However...
For ONE, that is not ALL i want to do ALL of the time when I am on EVE. And that is what this system turns it into.
I WOULD, at times like to be able to enjoy the other aspects of the game wihout interferrence from this overkill war spam. I thought this is what we had 0.0 and other professions for.
EVE boasts itself on diversity and how you are never locked to any one profession or play style.. well guess what? Now the style has been locked. By the Privateers OWN claim, their experiment has made empire JUST like 0.0, so where is the diversity in that? Its all the same now.
TWO, fighting back gets me nowhere. What, just to get a few kills... woop dee dooooo!
Id rather be spending that effort with my mates in 0.0 for some actual cause and effect. The Privateers have brilliantly formed themselved and they are an idea. They are arbitrary and are willing to sacrifice funds for their.. efforts. Good for them, but far me it is not an interesting enemy, just a hassle to deal with. Its like a shooting gallery with no real feel to it and feels unimmersive.
But that is just me.
QFT
|
|

Tom Gunn
Caldari North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:36:00 -
[171]
Gotta love privateers,
Keep taking names guys.
|

BoBoZoBo
Foundation R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 13:36:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Cindare Don't you folks see the valuable service that PA provides? These guys were kind enough to expedite my podjump from Jita back to 0.0 in record time! And they pay for the priviledge; I wouldn't have it any other way.
Grats on the shuttle killmail, by the way. 
<3 PA
LOLOLOLOL--- OMG I thought I was he only one who used them for that!!!!
Whenevr I am coming back from 0.0 to Jita, I try to find a PA and let them pod me so I dont need to use my jumclone.. wait 24hrs, or jump 20+ gates.
Unfortunatley, since you dont find a lot of PA in 0.0, I already have to be close to empire to see them :(
But that is the ONLY service they provide.. and it does not outweigh the annoyance anymore. =========================
Minister of Propaganda - Operator 9 |

Ayumu Kosuga
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 14:18:00 -
[173]
Originally by: EinaruS i completely agree, declaring wars in empire should be forbidden, concord should start recruiting everyone and take over the low-sec killing all pirates and would be pvpers on sight, then move into 0.0 and basically raise the sec status in every single system in the game to 1.0. that way this legalized piracy would be at an end because it's just ridiculous that such violence should even exist.
hihi .. you forgot the punch-line  
i'm quite sure he's joking, otherwise i'd have to abuse him on the E-R board 
/me watches einarus getting paranoid 
|

Fubarski
Caldari Centauri Project
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 15:40:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Gladia Horusthu Sanctions are a joke, I don't think there's ever been an instance where this has proven to have been the deciding factor in rl politics. Specifics are, of course, against the forum rules, but economic options such as sanctions simply do not work in rl.
Quite a few instances actually. You should check history better.
Enforced sanctions/Embargos have a dramatic effect.
Japan, 1941, Oil Embargo on them did a pretty good job.
Last year, South Korea threatened to shut down North Koreas main port area (that the south gave them as a "carrot") over some rough posturing. That, and stating that the North Koreans might not get their "free food for behaving" ration... brought them back to the 6 party talks.
Before, between, and after, sanctions work, if the threat of enforcement of those sanctions is real enough.
Fubar
|

Aindrias
Amarr Fomus-Amarr Industrial Novus Ordos Seclorum
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 15:47:00 -
[175]
To All Privateers:
Very few people (that may or may not have been joking) are pusing a solution to the extreme. As in, taking all war decs away in empire etc. Most people want a compromise so... heck... crazy idea... everyone can have fun
90% of Justice is Retribution...so CONCORD is very much like "police" in that respect.
I live in 0.0 and I haven't had this much fun in the game. Empire Wars are frustrating. "EVE" Devs have stated that "WARS HAVE GOALS" and goals in empire are sketchy at best. There's no space to take and no outpost/POS to take/destroy. It basically just killing ships, which if you aren't as good at/skilled as the guy trying to kill you, you'll prob end up sitting in a station and waiting it out or quiting the game. YAY Fun for all!
So to most Pirvateers talking on this thread quite going to extremes when answering back to people. There's like 2 guys asking for 2 war in empire and like 30 asking for a compromise for everyone.
Aind
See what you can do with Paintbrush? |

Infinity MKII
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 15:51:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Lucky Lynn OMG!. I remember the days when Infinity Ziona was given so much s**t on these forums, flamed and accused of whining.
I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose.
Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
But it wasn't enough. Nope not at all. Why? Because there is a cap on the amount of active war decs a corp is allowed to have. So spawned the alliance.
NOW i think it is absolutely hilarious, how many people are actually whining about that inspirational IDEA.
Funnily enough I have two characters in two different alliances who are actively war dec'd by the Privateers. DO YOU HEAR ME WHINING!? NO YOU DON'T. SO STFU. I have lost numerous ships to the privateers.
In ending all I have to say is congrats Infinity.
Thanks m8. Im still hanging around lurking occasionally. I think it was this thread Linkage and from another by Eilie who wrote "Infinity Ziona, you always make such funny suggestions... If you want to annoy someone in empire who killed you in 0.0, than just declare war!".
So really Privateers alliance is just doing what was suggested, people should be more careful what they wish for or suggest maybe cause it may just come true 
|

Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:15:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Ayumu Kosuga
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
that'S the reason why privateers have every right to their wardec's.
traders/producer force their prices on combatants. combatants force bullets and missiles on the traders/producers.
it's a circle. 
Maybe the traders should be allowed to refuse sales to specific corps/alliances via the market.
|

Banana Torres
The Green Banana Corporation Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:23:00 -
[178]
Originally by: Jimer Lins Maybe the traders should be allowed to refuse sales to specific corps/alliances via the market.
Yeah, I agree, it sickens me when I see that I have sold to a BoB cheater or one of their pets.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:27:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Banana Torres
Originally by: Jimer Lins Maybe the traders should be allowed to refuse sales to specific corps/alliances via the market.
Yeah, I agree, it sickens me when I see that I have sold to a BoB cheater or one of their pets.
IBTS
(in before the *snip*)
|

Templer Relleg
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:28:00 -
[180]
Originally by: Jimer Lins
Originally by: Ayumu Kosuga
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Yes, EVE is non-consentual PVP, but PVP is NOT just combat and blowing up ships.
that'S the reason why privateers have every right to their wardec's.
traders/producer force their prices on combatants. combatants force bullets and missiles on the traders/producers.
it's a circle. 
Maybe the traders should be allowed to refuse sales to specific corps/alliances via the market.
Wow ye, thats a really good idea. Would make it lots more interresting. You will see that the big coallition and their friends would stop the sale to bob, and there will grow a market.
PLEASE!!!
|
|

Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:38:00 -
[181]
Originally by: Banana Torres
Originally by: Jimer Lins Maybe the traders should be allowed to refuse sales to specific corps/alliances via the market.
Yeah, I agree, it sickens me when I see that I have sold to a BoB cheater or one of their pets.
Well, I can't speak to that specifically, and I'm not exactly a trader. However, it seems to me that it's not really out of line to think that the people selling things should be allowed to refuse to sell to the people who are likely to pod them. It seems that it could be a good balancing mechanic, but it may have drawbacks. Just spitballing here. ;)
|

Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:42:00 -
[182]
Actually, it occurs to me that you could easily tie something like this into the standings system- let someone set "market options" and tie it to a specific skill in trading- say Trading III or something.
You could have options that either raise or lower prices by percentages based on standings, and refuse sales to standings below a certain point. Maybe set different options for personal standings, but that's probably more effectively managed through private contracts.
Meh, maybe drifting off topic. But if the target can't fight back with guns, maybe they can fight back with ISK. :)
|

Kaaii
Caldari Equilibrium LLC
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 16:45:00 -
[183]
the trouble with "sales refusal" via corp/alliance filters would probably come from the refused corp/alliance members using alts to buy then. If you refused the alts corp (npc/non-corped players) you would cut out a huge customer base. Cutting off your nose to spite your face as it were.
I would live to see some way to be able to filter sales to only friendly/non-hostile corps, but given the alt glut, i don't see this ever happening...
Kaaii
Trading 101 Kaaii-Net Research Labs
|

Kruel
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 17:08:00 -
[184]
If you can't handle a war, you can always surrender. 
|

Paul Castrin
Gallente Shiva Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 18:36:00 -
[185]
Originally by: Ki An snip long list
Of these 69 wars, 50 are against alliances, the vast bulk of which are 0.0 alliances. 8 are against Empire industrial corps.
Nice list Ki An, very interesting.
I'll admit I was one of the "omg griefers!" group when it came to Privateer members but I've calmed down a bit since. Most are just taking advantage of the war'dec system and many (and yes I know a few and even call them friends) prey mostly on those that really should be able to fight or at lease fight back. In other words not all are hauler gankers. Of course they wouldn't be CALLED privateers if they didn't raid commerce. 
But I would like to point out two things that came to my mind after reading your post:
1) noticeably lacking from the above list are any true PvP only alliances or merc outfits. I find this especially interesting in that the two most powerful PvP alliances are not in that list, namely MC and BoB. That is not to say there aren't other allies of both there but it struck me as an interesting omission on the part of the Privateers. Perhaps the list was between war'decs but there is no way of confirming that with any real accuracy.
2) that most people in those alliances (yes I'm in one) should really be able to adjust to dealing with Privateers. It's not really hard after all and you don't need multiple accounts to, you just need, gasp, teamwork. If an alliance is scattered to the four corners of EVE then it's time that alliance’s HC start getting more organized.
One last point: I do still feel that the war'dec system is broken in a way. There should be consequences when you are war dec'ing corps and alliances in such high numbers. Increasing the cost is a possible fix but I doubt that will do a thing. Maybe a neg modifier to the alliance’s standing to Empires that have pos standings to the dec'd corps/alliances? Would be interesting but I doubt CCP would be willing to make anything like war dec's have actual consequences.
Anyway, nice list and thanks for putting the effort into it.
Peace.

|

Le Skunk
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 20:28:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Paul Castrin
1) noticeably lacking from the above list are any true PvP only alliances or merc outfits. I find this especially interesting in that the two most powerful PvP alliances are not in that list, namely MC and BoB. That is not to say there aren't other allies of both there but it struck me as an interesting omission on the part of the Privateers. Perhaps the list was between war'decs but there is no way of confirming that with any real accuracy.
We have deced both the people you have mentioned above more then once. We do rotate decs regualaly. The ommision of a BoB dec at the moment I always thought was an ommision on the part of the coalition leadership tbh who arnt taking advanatage of our service. However, I chcecked again and seems someone has paid us to dec them as of this post.
We have decced many widley regarded 'pure pvp' outfits, though it seems eveyone has a different opinion over who this term applys to.
Anyhows Cheers for your point
SKUNK
|

Le Skunk
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 20:33:00 -
[187]
Originally by: Infinity MKII
Originally by: Lucky Lynn OMG!. I remember the days when Infinity Ziona was given so much s**t on these forums, flamed and accused of whining.
I also remember the day when Infinity Ziona announced a plan for a new type of corp and it's sole purpose.
Which if I remember correctly, and I paraphrasing here, was "...if I can't go into 0.0 without being blobbed then the blobbers are not coming into empire."
And it worked. If I remember correctly Infinity Ziona's corp war dec'd the biggest alliances (including BoB).
But it wasn't enough. Nope not at all. Why? Because there is a cap on the amount of active war decs a corp is allowed to have. So spawned the alliance.
NOW i think it is absolutely hilarious, how many people are actually whining about that inspirational IDEA.
Funnily enough I have two characters in two different alliances who are actively war dec'd by the Privateers. DO YOU HEAR ME WHINING!? NO YOU DON'T. SO STFU. I have lost numerous ships to the privateers.
In ending all I have to say is congrats Infinity.
Thanks m8. Im still hanging around lurking occasionally. I think it was this thread Linkage and from another by Eilie who wrote "Infinity Ziona, you always make such funny suggestions... If you want to annoy someone in empire who killed you in 0.0, than just declare war!".
So really Privateers alliance is just doing what was suggested, people should be more careful what they wish for or suggest maybe cause it may just come true 
If this is you dude - nice to see your still following up with what you started :) Hope all is cool
SKUNK
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 20:36:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Kruel If you can't handle a war, you can always surrender. 
Why doesn't any one take that option anyways?
|

Kruel
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 20:57:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Kruel If you can't handle a war, you can always surrender. 
Why doesn't any one take that option anyways?
Actually many corps surrender every day. It's the ones that don't who come here and whine. 
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 21:15:00 -
[190]
Originally by: Kruel
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Kruel If you can't handle a war, you can always surrender. 
Why doesn't any one take that option anyways?
Actually many corps surrender every day. It's the ones that don't who come here and whine. 
What do you get from them?
Do you make any ridiculous requests? Like 5000 exotic dancers maybe?
|
|

Gort
Rampage Eternal Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 21:32:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Vicious Phoenix Borrowing a WoW phrase, L2P n00bs. Solutions 1) Move in gangs. 2) Join a corp who isn't dec'd. 3) Make a hauler alt. 4) Stay out of empire 5) The best reason: SHOOT BACK!
Idea Hamster....
Low-tech sig: "When in doubt, empty the magazine." |

Kruel
Beyond Divinity Inc Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 21:45:00 -
[192]
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Kruel
Originally by: Thread Winner
Originally by: Kruel If you can't handle a war, you can always surrender. 
Why doesn't any one take that option anyways?
Actually many corps surrender every day. It's the ones that don't who come here and whine. 
What do you get from them?
Do you make any ridiculous requests? Like 5000 exotic dancers maybe?
Sure... exotic dancers, minmatard slaves, human livestock of all kinds for entertainment and consumption.
Actually I haven't a clue what the Alliance gets from corps that surrender. I just see the messages from Concord in the Alliance mailbox every day about so and so corp surrendering.
|

Banana Torres
The Green Banana Corporation Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 21:53:00 -
[193]
Originally by: Kruel I just see the messages from Concord in the Alliance mailbox every day about so and so corp surrendering.
These messages are automatically generated when a corp leaves an alliance that we have wardec'd. Basically when a corp leaves an alliance it is automatically wardec'd as a corporation, but then it automatically surrenders. This means we still have 24 hours of pew pew before they are safe. Or we choose to wardec the individual corp, which is very unlikely.
|

Hamfast
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 22:01:00 -
[194]
Putting my tongue firmly in my cheek...
I note that BoB is not on the Privateers hit list, they must be BoB Alts... (Now the other half of the players will hate you)
I am a care bear, I do not like PvP more so non consensual, so I consent by logging on and leaving the station...
I am guessing that there are enough different players in the Privateers at any given time that only us care bears are not represented...
Take this thread, we have a list of Noob Gankers, Shuttle Podders, Scanner Gods, and the top of the list.. the "I can't be bothered with 0.0" from a guy in the corp that is said to have made Empire 0.0 space...
I need to make myself an alt to post here with, I think I will name him "Hamfast's Posting Alt"... think anyone will know it's me?
Concord is just like the police, they only show up after the crime...
Empire with all the wardecs is not like 0.0 or lowsec space, I only have to worry about suicide Gangers and those that Wardec me in Empire, I have to worry about everyone in Lowsec and 0.0...
Ok, go back to your reading and I will go back to work.
Noob in training...
|

Ki An
Gallente The Really Awesome Players
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 22:33:00 -
[195]
The economic warfare with refusal of sales idea is actually a pretty darn good one. I would love for this to be implemented. The problem, as already mentioned, is alts. Seems alts are a problem in quite a lot of issues lately. I for one don't like when people can't be held accountable for their actions, and so alt is generally a bad thing imo.
Perhaps it's time to limit accounts to one character? Would solve a lot of problems, and not cause anything that can't be worked around with other means. Am I wrong?
/Ki
Remember, kids: Beware: I'm a "viscous pirate"! |

Hamfast
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 23:05:00 -
[196]
Originally by: Ki An The economic warfare with refusal of sales idea is actually a pretty darn good one. I would love for this to be implemented. The problem, as already mentioned, is alts. Seems alts are a problem in quite a lot of issues lately. I for one don't like when people can't be held accountable for their actions, and so alt is generally a bad thing imo.
Perhaps it's time to limit accounts to one character? Would solve a lot of problems, and not cause anything that can't be worked around with other means. Am I wrong?
/Ki
In an attempt to use real life... The USA (us, the good guys, Growers of Corn...) have an embargo against Cuba (Evil nasty commie bastages) so the Cubans buy from the French, who buy from us... there you go, a real life alt...
Alts are part of the game, like Jet-Cans and War Decs... that some may not like the way they are used means nothing, as long as they are used within the rules as set by CCP.
Noob in training...
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.09 23:15:00 -
[197]
Originally by: Hamfast
Originally by: Ki An The economic warfare with refusal of sales idea is actually a pretty darn good one. I would love for this to be implemented. The problem, as already mentioned, is alts. Seems alts are a problem in quite a lot of issues lately. I for one don't like when people can't be held accountable for their actions, and so alt is generally a bad thing imo.
Perhaps it's time to limit accounts to one character? Would solve a lot of problems, and not cause anything that can't be worked around with other means. Am I wrong?
/Ki
In an attempt to use real life... The USA (us, the good guys, Growers of Corn...) have an embargo against Cuba (Evil nasty commie bastages) so the Cubans buy from the French, who buy from us... there you go, a real life alt...
Alts are part of the game, like Jet-Cans and War Decs... that some may not like the way they are used means nothing, as long as they are used within the rules as set by CCP.
RL POLITICS ALERT!
*Nuclear Lock Detected*
|

H Zub
Captain Morgan Society Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.10 18:01:00 -
[198]
http://www.whine-online.com |

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.10 19:09:00 -
[199]
Originally by: H Zub http://www.whine-online.com
Your link disappointed me 
Fight against log off tactics to protect your space from isk farmers! |

Lucy Light
|
Posted - 2007.04.10 19:56:00 -
[200]
Edited by: Lucy Light on 10/04/2007 19:53:35 i say gg to privateers 
making travelling through empire way more interesting 
|
|

RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.10 19:58:00 -
[201]
Originally by: Lucy Light Edited by: Lucy Light on 10/04/2007 19:53:35 i say gg to privateers 
making travelling through empire way more interesting 
And the Unoriginal Post of the Day goes to...
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 01:06:00 -
[202]
Originally by: Corporate Stooge
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Originally by: Azerrad InExile Or you could... fight back maybe?
Well, I never said that I did not.
I (my main) have quite often made good target practice of the Privateers, we have had some good battles.
However...
For ONE, that is not ALL i want to do ALL of the time when I am on EVE. And that is what this system turns it into.
I WOULD, at times like to be able to enjoy the other aspects of the game wihout interferrence from this overkill war spam. I thought this is what we had 0.0 and other professions for.
EVE boasts itself on diversity and how you are never locked to any one profession or play style.. well guess what? Now the style has been locked. By the Privateers OWN claim, their experiment has made empire JUST like 0.0, so where is the diversity in that? Its all the same now.
TWO, fighting back gets me nowhere. What, just to get a few kills... woop dee dooooo!
Id rather be spending that effort with my mates in 0.0 for some actual cause and effect. The Privateers have brilliantly formed themselved and they are an idea. They are arbitrary and are willing to sacrifice funds for their.. efforts. Good for them, but far me it is not an interesting enemy, just a hassle to deal with. Its like a shooting gallery with no real feel to it and feels unimmersive.
But that is just me.
QFT
HUH.. LO.. wow.. that was amazing
|

MasterEnt
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 01:08:00 -
[203]
Edited by: MasterEnt on 11/04/2007 01:06:57
Originally by: Hamfast
Originally by: Ki An The economic warfare with refusal of sales idea is actually a pretty darn good one. I would love for this to be implemented. The problem, as already mentioned, is alts. Seems alts are a problem in quite a lot of issues lately. I for one don't like when people can't be held accountable for their actions, and so alt is generally a bad thing imo.
Perhaps it's time to limit accounts to one character? Would solve a lot of problems, and not cause anything that can't be worked around with other means. Am I wrong?
/Ki
In an attempt to use real life... The USA (us, the good guys, Growers of Corn...) have an embargo against Cuba (Evil nasty commie bastages) so the Cubans buy from the French, who buy from us... there you go, a real life alt...
Alts are part of the game, like Jet-Cans and War Decs... that some may not like the way they are used means nothing, as long as they are used within the rules as set by CCP.
Yeah, but we use alts to aviod this silly wardec abuse as well. So in the end its not about avoiding it.. but just making it a bigger pain in the ass to play.
Great game development.
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 02:06:00 -
[204]
Originally by: Lucy Light Edited by: Lucy Light on 10/04/2007 19:53:35 i say gg to privateers 
making travelling through empire way more interesting 
Hooray, a fan! 
Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking ... ~Liz Kali
|

Tareen Kashaar
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 02:49:00 -
[205]
Quote: 2007.04.10 21:25 Privateer Alliance has declared war on The Star Fraction. After 24 hours fighting can legally occur between those involved.
Woot! Free, convenient targets! :D
This was my reaction. Looking forward to popping faction fitted Ravens in Amarr all day long, while our war targets hide in their stations or play shuttlemonkey in their stabbed interceptors :)
It's not getting out of hand, it's a brilliant way to get free targets :) --- WTS: Forum Signatures, 30mil a piece. Evemail me!
|

Clair Bear
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 06:04:00 -
[206]
Edited by: Clair Bear on 11/04/2007 06:01:23 NBSI works well enough to deal with alt spies (neutrals) in 0.0. I'd be fine with a system which lets me set significantly higher prices for those not 'blue.'
Yes, newbies are free to sell dirt cheap to people who blow em up. Eventually they'll learn.
|

RedFall
Irreligion
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 06:07:00 -
[207]
Ok, I officially declare this thread to have reached it's saturation point of ghey. It's done. Anyone who posts after me is to be ridiculed severely.
|

Le Skunk
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 07:30:00 -
[208]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 11/04/2007 07:27:42
Originally by: Karasuma Akane Hence, they've garnered a reputation (correct or not) for wardecing as many small highsec industrialist/mining/missioning/trading corporations as they can afford, in order to collect easy kills against players who are generally uninterested in or less inclined to engage in PVP combat. 
Perhaps if the Privateers reoriented themselves back toward their apparent beginnings, and set themselves up as a scourge against Empire entry from the major 0.0 corporations and alliances, they wouldn't have such a widespread image as griefer-gankers of carebears? (And they'd be going up against others who are ready and willing to battle, as evidenced by their choice to join a nullsec-based corp.)
The wars the privateer alliance sets itself are pretty much always against the biggest alliances (baring a few for smaktalkers/lootthiefs)
However, in an attemp to empower the little man, we also offer our services for cost price war decs. We charge nothing more then the concord war dec. This enables the poor guy ganked on a gate whilst making his first foray into low sec/0.0 to have the last laugh when some corp goes "what youz gonn do boutz it n00b". Well he can have us back him up.
This has of course meant that some people may find some of our wardecs a little questionable form their perspective. But trust me - nearly every one who sets a dec with me has a story: ganked me on a gate, stole my ore, called me a terd, etc. I dont judge them.. just set the dec and off we go.
SKUNK
Originally by: RedFall Ok, I officially declare this thread to have reached it's saturation point of ghey. It's done. Anyone who posts after me is to be ridiculed severely.
Anyone prior to this posting is official bhent
|

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 07:37:00 -
[209]
Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction.... resorting to meta-gaming , alts etc, is not the solution to this problem, anyway ccp is changing the wardec system, i am waiting to see how this will progress...
|

Barbara Nichole
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:52:00 -
[210]
I'll be flamed for this I'm sure.. but I think that if you dec it should require you to voluntarily give up concord protection across the board during and for up to 2 weeks after the war is concluded. Anyone should be able to shoot at you. Concord has no reason at all to appreciate war decs going on in Empire. Maybe this would at least end some of the frivolous war decs.
Also, I hear complaints about "carebears" leaving after a dec all the time (As if this in not something we see in the real world). What they fail to admit is how many leave in the deccing corp as well; I've seen this trend just as often.
|
|

NeverL
Enterprise Estonia Cult of War
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 21:57:00 -
[211]
Edited by: NeverL on 11/04/2007 21:54:17 damn concord is corrupt, i attacked a noob corp alt in yulai and i didnt get concordokkened
privateers are doing a good job
if ur not ready to play this game dont leave the noob corp. if ur ready, step into the real world and kill someone.
its not sim city, its eve ----------------- My dream is to become the best forum warrior there is. Even better then Molle Sir. |

hedfunk
Caldari Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.11 22:27:00 -
[212]
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction.... resorting to meta-gaming , alts etc, is not the solution to this problem, anyway ccp is changing the wardec system, i am waiting to see how this will progress...
What indy corp, how many times oes this have to be said, we war big alliances and ppl who we're paid to war. We don't activley hunt down people. So if a orp is being greifed into submission week after week, it's becuse they're stupid enough to walk into our gate camps constantly.
|

SiJira
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 00:28:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Barbara Nichole I'll be flamed for this I'm sure.. but I think that if you dec it should require you to voluntarily give up concord protection across the board during and for up to 2 weeks after the war is concluded. Anyone should be able to shoot at you. Concord has no reason at all to appreciate war decs going on in Empire. Maybe this would at least end some of the frivolous war decs.
Also, I hear complaints about "carebears" leaving after a dec all the time (As if this in not something we see in the real world). What they fail to admit is how many leave in the deccing corp as well; I've seen this trend just as often.
thats a bit harsh. It would break any sort of industrial players to even be in pvp corps.
|

Infinity MKII
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 00:46:00 -
[214]
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction....
Corporations do this all the time in real life, then buy out the company when it fails, rip it to peices and sell off the parts. Is it wrong? Maybe. Is it normal human behaviour, sure.
Take a look at the Machevillian period and see how they worked, in fact the whole of history is littered with economic political warfare as well as the standard type of fighting. This is normal behaviour and should be encouraged because it brings more depth to EvE.
And unlike real life, you can choose to become impervious to violence in EvE, so there is an answer, you just refuse to take it.
Infinity Ziona
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 02:13:00 -
[215]
Edited by: Thread Winner on 12/04/2007 02:09:42 If anything Corporations need to be more sucesptible to be put in positions to surrender instead of disband + reform.
He who controls the privateers controls the universe!
(in empire anyways)
Fight against log off tactics to protect your space from isk farmers! |

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 03:01:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Thread Winner Edited by: Thread Winner on 12/04/2007 02:09:42 If anything Corporations need to be more sucesptible to be put in positions to surrender instead of disband + reform.
He who controls the privateers controls the universe!
(in empire anyways)
When a corporation surrenders, the winning party should get all their stuff... ALL their stuff 
Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking ... ~Liz Kali
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 03:45:00 -
[217]
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny
Originally by: Thread Winner Edited by: Thread Winner on 12/04/2007 02:09:42 If anything Corporations need to be more sucesptible to be put in positions to surrender instead of disband + reform.
He who controls the privateers controls the universe!
(in empire anyways)
When a corporation surrenders, the winning party should get all their stuff... ALL their stuff 
AFAIK when you surrender (actually surrender not drop alliance to avoid war) you have to meet the CEO of the winning corps demands.
Fight against log off tactics to protect your space from isk farmers! |

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 03:59:00 -
[218]
Originally by: Barbara Nichole I'll be flamed for this I'm sure.. but I think that if you dec it should require you to voluntarily give up concord protection across the board during and for up to 2 weeks after the war is concluded. Anyone should be able to shoot at you. Concord has no reason at all to appreciate war decs going on in Empire. Maybe this would at least end some of the frivolous war decs.
Also, I hear complaints about "carebears" leaving after a dec all the time (As if this in not something we see in the real world). What they fail to admit is how many leave in the deccing corp as well; I've seen this trend just as often.
I actully like this idea
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 04:12:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Spaceman Jack
Originally by: Barbara Nichole I'll be flamed for this I'm sure.. but I think that if you dec it should require you to voluntarily give up concord protection across the board during and for up to 2 weeks after the war is concluded. Anyone should be able to shoot at you. Concord has no reason at all to appreciate war decs going on in Empire. Maybe this would at least end some of the frivolous war decs.
Also, I hear complaints about "carebears" leaving after a dec all the time (As if this in not something we see in the real world). What they fail to admit is how many leave in the deccing corp as well; I've seen this trend just as often.
I actully like this idea
In that case you should be able to declare yourself an enemy of the state and you can attack everything and everything can attack you.
Fight against log off tactics to protect your space from isk farmers! |

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 07:24:00 -
[220]
Originally by: hedfunk
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction.... resorting to meta-gaming , alts etc, is not the solution to this problem, anyway ccp is changing the wardec system, i am waiting to see how this will progress...
What indy corp, how many times oes this have to be said, we war big alliances and ppl who we're paid to war. We don't activley hunt down people. So if a orp is being greifed into submission week after week, it's becuse they're stupid enough to walk into our gate camps constantly.
Keep insulting everyone, that will do wonders to privateers reputation. Like i said lets see what CCP has done to the wardec system... coming soon(tm)...
|
|

Ashaz
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 08:05:00 -
[221]
bah. Privateers are a bunch of cowards.
They claim to be big bad pvpers, but all I ever see them do is sit in gatecamps killing lone targets. As soon as anyone arives with enough force to take them on, they flee.
All they realy do is stop people from running missions while the dec is active. not worth chaseing them, and no real threat if you know how to handle yourself.
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 08:59:00 -
[222]
Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 12/04/2007 08:55:44
Originally by: Ashaz bah. Privateers are a bunch of cowards.
They claim to be big bad pvpers, but all I ever see them do is sit in gatecamps killing lone targets. As soon as anyone arives with enough force to take them on, they flee.
All they realy do is stop people from running missions while the dec is active. not worth chaseing them, and no real threat if you know how to handle yourself.
Actually, a couple of us ran into a lone wardecced guy in a retriever once... good day that was 
And I used my scanner and everything so I actually went out and tried to find him... then my buddy accidently warped into him 
Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking ... ~Liz Kali
|

Jade Grimpkin
Trader's Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 09:16:00 -
[223]
Originally by: Infinity MKII
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction....
Corporations do this all the time in real life, then buy out the company when it fails, rip it to peices and sell off the parts. Is it wrong? Maybe. Is it normal human behaviour, sure.
Take a look at the Machevillian period and see how they worked, in fact the whole of history is littered with economic political warfare as well as the standard type of fighting. This is normal behaviour and should be encouraged because it brings more depth to EvE.
And unlike real life, you can choose to become impervious to violence in EvE, so there is an answer, you just refuse to take it.
Infinity Ziona
Now that would be awesome, giving us proper industrial corps a way of buying up a company and ripping them to pieces. At the moment the economic side of warfare is sadly dominated by the "i've got an enormous spaceship and i'm going to camp you" which, although subtle, isn't reaching the depths i was hoping.
|

Thread Winner
Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 09:35:00 -
[224]
Edited by: Thread Winner on 12/04/2007 09:31:11
Originally by: Jade Grimpkin
Originally by: Infinity MKII
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction....
Corporations do this all the time in real life, then buy out the company when it fails, rip it to peices and sell off the parts. Is it wrong? Maybe. Is it normal human behaviour, sure.
Take a look at the Machevillian period and see how they worked, in fact the whole of history is littered with economic political warfare as well as the standard type of fighting. This is normal behaviour and should be encouraged because it brings more depth to EvE.
And unlike real life, you can choose to become impervious to violence in EvE, so there is an answer, you just refuse to take it.
Infinity Ziona
Now that would be awesome, giving us proper industrial corps a way of buying up a company and ripping them to pieces. At the moment the economic side of warfare is sadly dominated by the "i've got an enormous spaceship and i'm going to camp you" which, although subtle, isn't reaching the depths i was hoping.
Buy 51% of X corps shares and go crazy
Fight against log off tactics to protect your space from isk farmers! |

Jade Grimpkin
Trader's Academy
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 09:49:00 -
[225]
Edited by: Jade Grimpkin on 12/04/2007 09:47:57 Edited by: Jade Grimpkin on 12/04/2007 09:47:44 Yeah. but I'm doubting most pirate corps would sell. There was that unfortate krazed killer kitties from kent corp that got in a bit of trouble like that.
I'm not against war decs, it's just a bit of diversity in how one fights them would be nice.
|

hedfunk
Caldari Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 11:35:00 -
[226]
Edited by: hedfunk on 12/04/2007 11:32:07
Originally by: Mortok Tristan
Originally by: hedfunk
Originally by: Mortok Tristan Le Skunk,
Some ppl are misusing your system to bring down industrial alliances, lets face it 50M isk is a small price to pay to watch an industrial alliance week after week beeing griefed to extinction.... resorting to meta-gaming , alts etc, is not the solution to this problem, anyway ccp is changing the wardec system, i am waiting to see how this will progress...
What indy corp, how many times oes this have to be said, we war big alliances and ppl who we're paid to war. We don't activley hunt down people. So if a orp is being greifed into submission week after week, it's becuse they're stupid enough to walk into our gate camps constantly.
Keep insulting everyone, that will do wonders to privateers reputation. Like i said lets see what CCP has done to the wardec system... coming soon(tm)...
I'm insulting no one. I'm pointing out fact. If your corps ships keep getting blown up by the privs, it's because you're giving us them by walking straight into our gatecamps 'week after week'. After just one week, they should know the areas we hang out...
|

djenghis jan
Amarr Pilier des Bananes
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 11:57:00 -
[227]
I wonder if we could get a dev response on the issue and maybe a timetrack on how soon they will change the war deccing system to rectify the situation.
|

Le Skunk
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 14:27:00 -
[228]
Originally by: djenghis jan I wonder if we could get a dev response on the issue and maybe a timetrack on how soon they will change the war deccing system to rectify the situation.
There is no situation
SKUNK
|

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 14:44:00 -
[229]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Originally by: djenghis jan I wonder if we could get a dev response on the issue and maybe a timetrack on how soon they will change the war deccing system to rectify the situation.
There is no situation
SKUNK
There is a situation
|

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar Sicarri Covenant Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 15:37:00 -
[230]
Originally by: Mortok Tristan
Originally by: Le Skunk
Originally by: djenghis jan I wonder if we could get a dev response on the issue and maybe a timetrack on how soon they will change the war deccing system to rectify the situation.
There is no situation
SKUNK
There is a situation
There is no situation 
Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking ... ~Liz Kali
|
|

djenghis jan
Amarr Pilier des Bananes
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 15:51:00 -
[231]
Edited by: djenghis jan on 12/04/2007 15:50:31 Edited by: djenghis jan on 12/04/2007 15:50:10 Edited by: djenghis jan on 12/04/2007 15:49:43
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny
Originally by: Mortok Tristan
Originally by: Le Skunk
Yeah yeah, there is no spoon. But surely feeding a baby porrage is harder than this. One can be pro or con but objectively one must admit that playing the game before privateers is not the same as it is now for those on the recieving end of this non-consensual play style. The phrase "non-consensual" says it all. So people will adapt either by corp rotation or similar tactics or the war deccing system will be changed. Its just who gets tired first the devs or the players
|

Auldare
The Ninja Coalition Phobos Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:01:00 -
[232]
What is currently being done has happened all throughout eve's lifespan. The only difference from what I see is that Privateers are the first to bring it to such a scale. There always used to be small corps deccing corps either through merc contracts or for pure extorsion. This is not something new it's just people now can put a face to it more.
I have in my day been part of wars against people who thought they were powerful and became arrogant due to their mistaken beliefs and it was their fellow corp members who always cried that we were griefing them.
From what I can gather (just got back in the game a few weeks ago after a year break) Privateers seem to be going for the larger alliances alt corps etc, I may be wrong and would be grateful for anyone to bring me up to speed on the whole ethos of the Privateers.
================================================
|

Daimos Bellurdan
Black Reign FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:04:00 -
[233]
While I am not fond of the Privateers (who is?) I must say that this thread is hilarious. Its just great to see all those carebears go crazy. Its funny to see that hardly anyone wants to fight back or GET MERCS. Its always: this is bad/an exploit/bugged because I can not play the way I want to. I am sorry to say this but: In eve you are not safe anywhere. Again: You can be killed anywhere at any time without any reasons. This was one of the central points when eve was developed (together with risk = reward). If you want to be totaly secure you are simply playing the wrong game. So adapt. There are a lot of ways to deal with the situation but it involves thinking, resources and teamwork. But thats exactly what eve is about.
|

djenghis jan
Amarr Pilier des Bananes
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:26:00 -
[234]
Originally by: Daimos Bellurdan So adapt. There are a lot of ways to deal with the situation but it involves thinking, resources and teamwork.
Well i gues this is true, and i gues i did adapt there are lots of ways one can use to evade playing the game others want to play.
|

Mortok Tristan
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 16:29:00 -
[235]
Originally by: Daimos Bellurdan blah blah blah.
Fighting an enemy that stays in 1 alliance fine, fighting a blob of ever changing corps ? whats the point..
|

Dzil
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 17:20:00 -
[236]
Privateers in empire, and racketeers in 0.0. It's like if you undock you can be blown up, or something.
|

Scrutineer
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 19:24:00 -
[237]
Eve is PvP game. But there has always been room for a range of playing styles. CCPÆs game ads promise players a range of playing styles, and relatively secure areas. Three quotes from the current official player guide, from a web page near you:
1) ôEVE caters to many different play styles, ranging from the hard core combat commander to the patient miner ...... no matter what type of player you are, there is a place for you in EVE, even if you decide to carve it out yourself.ö 2) ôThe high security areas are a safe place to start, until you are ready to venture into the more aggressive areas of the game.ö
3) ôRemain in your empire's space until you are willing to risk what you can afford to lose in the more aggressive areas of space.ö
CCP should remember their promises. Some players have come to Eve, and found that they can have fun as a carebear in high-sec., and have no desire to go to the æmore aggressive areasÆ. This is a good thing. It is a strength of the game, not a weakness. They should not be nerfed.
The thing is that Privateering is fun! Mostly for the privateers, but not just them. They have created something interesting within the game; but something against its declared spirit (well, against the CCP marketing statements above anyhow). Basically, CCP has now made itself an unnecessary game balance problem. It needs to give some space back to the carebears, but ALSO change or replace the Wardeccing of Hi-Sec corps with something which is as much - or more - fun. No idea what that should be. Be amazed if it manages to do this without hacking a lot of people off, and loosing subscribers from one side of the argument or the other. Needs to put more thought into changes in future!
|

Emeal Zohlah
Gallente
|
Posted - 2007.04.12 23:32:00 -
[238]
As far as I have been reading in this thread, the Privateers are the ones, who want their cake and eat it too. Lets harken back to the days of the real Privateers. You could work for the English, Spanish, Portugese, or even French and Italians had theirs. However, if an English privateer docked in a Spanish port, a good hanging was the least of his worries.
So lets bring this idea forward. If you commit an act of piracy in Caldari space, you can't dock at any station in Caldari space and so on for each of the empires. An act of piracy is defined as looting any player ship that was not yours before it was destroyed. This allows for the wardeccing but takes the incentive of the Privateers away unless they are really serious about being pirates.
And for all of you big, bad 3 and 4 year old players targeting 3 and 4 month old noobs, I have a solution. Faction standing is reduced by the difference in months of the attacker to defender. A 36 month player destroying the ship of a 3 month player would lose 3.3 points of faction standing and it would double if the defender is 'gooed'.
If you want to brag about being all big and bad and mean then fess up and take the consequences as all pirates in the past had to.
|

Terranid Meester
Knights Hospitalier
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 00:04:00 -
[239]
Originally by: Emeal Zohlah targeting 3 and 4 month old noobs Quote:
To quote from somewhere else. "A noob or n00b is someone that lacks intelligence or common sense"
If thats the kind of people being killed then Im glad. Heres hoping they all get wiped out.
|

DragonRiderTao
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 00:10:00 -
[240]
Originally by: Terranid Meester
Originally by: Emeal Zohlah targeting 3 and 4 month old noobs Quote:
To quote from somewhere else. "A noob or n00b is someone that lacks intelligence or common sense"
If thats the kind of people being killed then Im glad. Heres hoping they all get wiped out.
Some people don't distinguish between noob and newb. He meant newb as the 3 months part should explain.
Real pirates live in 0.0 and kill player corps pilots.
How many dragons can you slay? You cant slay mine.
|
|

Paladineguru
Gallente DAB RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 02:12:00 -
[241]
Originally by: FarScape III If you can Blob in 0.0 some poor ******* nutral then you can not just be able to have a free ride in Empire Either.
The Privateers give it to the 0.0 blobbers just like the 0.0 blobbers give it to the nutrals in 0.0.
What's the matter? You can dish it out but can not take it?
i dont think its that m8, most real 0.0 alliances just use alts or second accounts and jump clones. thats why privateers had to go after thenormal empire residents and anything bigger than a 10 man corp that cath's thier interest. the blobbers just use alts to get around them. least most the guys i know do.
|

MasterEnt
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 04:17:00 -
[242]
Originally by: Emeal Zohlah As far as I have been reading in this thread, the Privateers are the ones, who want their cake and eat it too.
Exactomundo...
There are few here who have outright admited that 0.0 was too difficult for them so they like PA style.. so they p*ss in everyones cereal.
****ers... They have it easy.
|

Spaceman Jack
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 04:30:00 -
[243]
Originally by: Daimos Bellurdan While I am not fond of the Privateers (who is?) I must say that this thread is hilarious. Its just great to see all those carebears go crazy. Its funny to see that hardly anyone wants to fight back or GET MERCS. Its always: this is bad/an exploit/bugged because I can not play the way I want to. I am sorry to say this but: In eve you are not safe anywhere. Again: You can be killed anywhere at any time without any reasons. This was one of the central points when eve was developed (together with risk = reward). If you want to be totaly secure you are simply playing the wrong game. So adapt. There are a lot of ways to deal with the situation but it involves thinking, resources and teamwork. But thats exactly what eve is about.
Well, I for one have NO PROBLEM with blowing ships the f*ck up (or getting blown up for that matter :)) I personally do not see it as an exploit, but it is abuse and makes the game a little lamer, just like Nanos were, and they were dealt with accordingly. Privateers are the Nanos of wardecers.
There is no way to fight wardec abuse. Why would I spend time PVPing Privateers in empire.. when I can spend that time PVPin for territory in 0.0? Why spend money on MERCS against the Privateers when I can spend that resource fighting an enemy that will actually get me somehwere?
They have an absolute advantage, they can crap in your eggs, but there is no real way to crap back in theirs. Brilliant for them, bad for EVE.
People give Privateers waaaaaay too much credit. Fighting Privateers is not difficult... its pointless, PERIOD It gets you nowhere other than some instant gratification, but if I want that I can play Counter Strike. That is my only problem with the abuse.
|

Borgholio
Minmatar Quantum Industries Prime Orbital Systems
|
Posted - 2007.04.13 22:40:00 -
[244]
I am still curious as to the actual changes that were supposedly made on the test server. Has anybody actually logged onto Sisi and checked yet? ----------------------------------- You will be assimilated...bunghole! |

Le Skunk
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 04:32:00 -
[245]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 14/04/2007 04:28:58
Originally by: Paladineguru
Originally by: FarScape III If you can Blob in 0.0 some poor ******* nutral then you can not just be able to have a free ride in Empire Either.
The Privateers give it to the 0.0 blobbers just like the 0.0 blobbers give it to the nutrals in 0.0.
What's the matter? You can dish it out but can not take it?
i dont think its that m8, most real 0.0 alliances just use alts or second accounts and jump clones. thats why privateers had to go after thenormal empire residents and anything bigger than a 10 man corp that cath's thier interest. the blobbers just use alts to get around them. least most the guys i know do.
ROFL
The big bad REAL PVPERs "come to 0.0 and fight me you noob panzys" types all use second accounts and alts to avoid us.
SKUNK
"a question - why are all the carebeards leaving their corp ticker off whilst they rant and lie"
|

Par'Gellen
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2007.04.14 04:46:00 -
[246]
CCP Trying To Implement PvP That Makes Sense ---
CCP : Save my mousewheel! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |