| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

The Economist
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:03:00 -
[1]
POS Bowling needs to be re-defined (again) as not being an exploit for two important reasons.
1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
2: The more ships there are on a grid, the more lag there is. Previously there was no way whatsoever to counter the massive lag generated at pos's by the countless ships carelessly left in space.[it has often been alleged of people that they leave said ships at pos purely to generate lag.] POS bowling gave the community a way to reduce the lag problems by removing the ships from the grid or forcing the offenders to use ship maintenance arrays for their intended purpose.
In summary, I don't know what provoked yet another policy change on this issue, but please seriously consider reverting to the previous ruling for the reasons stated above.
Cheers.
|

Shinigami
Gallente Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:13:00 -
[2]
signed --- Eve Comedy Gallery.
|

Jethro Jerico
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:14:00 -
[3]
I know it was fun 
Why oh why did somebody have to go and use it against BOB??!??
now its banned 
|

Parallax Error
Amarr Imperial Dreams Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:18:00 -
[4]
This can't be a serious opinion, surely?
|

Elmicker
The Phoenix Rising Vigilance Infinitas
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:21:00 -
[5]
Originally by: The Economist 1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
You obviously havent tried to use a ship maintenance array during wartime in a reinforced pos with 300+ in local.
|

Nicocat
Caldari New Age Solutions New Age Solutions Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:23:00 -
[6]
Joke thread by a BoB alt. Next thread, please.
Originally by: Splagada SEED ME DADDY
Down with alts! One character per account per IP! |

DiuxDium
Free Mercenaries Union FATAL Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:24:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Jethro Jerico I know it was fun 
Why oh why did somebody have to go and use it against BOB??!??
now its banned 
It's been used against BoB for months now, just slightly after ET first sat in his titan, to be exact. If I remember correctly, BoB lost a carrier to ET and CO a few weeks back.
OHH GOD SORRY CONSPIRACIES. I MEANT TO SAY BOB IS THE DEVIL. ALLAH AKHBAR ------------- [En] - So....I think the devs don't like me. |

The Economist
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:28:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Elmicker
Originally by: The Economist 1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
You obviously havent tried to use a ship maintenance array during wartime in a reinforced pos with 300+ in local.
Sorry, forgot it was necessary to wait till the pos is in reinforced and there are 300 people in local to use a module as intended 
...and yes this is a serious thread for the reasons stated in the original post.
|

JitaCitizen 72395
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:33:00 -
[9]
Why not just make it an exploit for piloted ships, and leave unpiloted ones to use the ship array?
|

Alora Venoda
Caldari GalTech
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:35:00 -
[10]
it may have "positive" impacts, but it still breaks the intended mechanics of the POS shields.
~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ Take away the risk and it would make flying around in space utterly pointless.
Take away the flying around part and you make EVE into a space themed spreadsheet application. |

Ozzie Asrail
Exploited
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:36:00 -
[11]
Originally by: The Economist
Originally by: Elmicker
Originally by: The Economist 1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
You obviously havent tried to use a ship maintenance array during wartime in a reinforced pos with 300+ in local.
Sorry, forgot it was necessary to wait till the pos is in reinforced and there are 300 people in local to use a module as intended 
...and yes this is a serious thread for the reasons stated in the original post.
Well, with a POS in reinfoced and 300+ in local is usually the sort of time people do actually need a ship out of the damn array  -----
|

The Economist
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:40:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Alora Venoda it may have "positive" impacts, but it still breaks the intended mechanics of the POS shields.
If pos shields were intended to not let anyone inside for even a millisecond then why have they never worked like that since they were introduced into the game?
I always thought of pos shields more like a balloon rather than a wall...I think the analogy is fairly obvious and describes how they have always worked.
|

The Economist
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:42:00 -
[13]
Edited by: The Economist on 30/05/2007 17:41:46
Originally by: Ozzie Asrail
Originally by: The Economist
Originally by: Elmicker
Originally by: The Economist 1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
You obviously havent tried to use a ship maintenance array during wartime in a reinforced pos with 300+ in local.
Sorry, forgot it was necessary to wait till the pos is in reinforced and there are 300 people in local to use a module as intended 
...and yes this is a serious thread for the reasons stated in the original post.
Well, with a POS in reinfoced and 300+ in local is usually the sort of time people do actually need a ship out of the damn array 
Sorry, I misread it as putting ships in he array; however doing anything in a system in that situation is laggy, so doesn't really equate to a valid reason for not using the array.... and further adding to the lag by not having done so and thereby having loads of empty ships sitting the bubble of said pos.
|

Treelox
Amarr Frontier Technologies
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:48:00 -
[14]
you have your answer now
Originally by: "GM Grimmi" pos bowling exploit reported by GM Grimmi | 2007.05.30 16:35:04 | NEW Greetings,
The so-called "POS Bowling" will from here on be considered an exploit. While it is true that this is not verifiable after the fact by way of logs, GMs are able to go ingame and monitor situations at will, and do it without anyone knowing. If we catch anyone doing this we will take the appropriate action against them. We therefore urge Titan and Mothership pilots to refrain from using their ships to bump ships out of POS forcefields, or risk facing punitive measures for exploiting.
All the best,
GM Grimmi Lead Game Master EVE Online Customer Support
-- http://www./sigs/Treelox/sig.png [orange]signature removed (change the zombie gagging sig) - please email us (with the signature URL) if you want to know why - Pirlouit([email protected] |

The Economist
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:50:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Treelox you have your answer now
Originally by: "GM Grimmi" pos bowling exploit reported by GM Grimmi | 2007.05.30 16:35:04 | NEW Greetings,
The so-called "POS Bowling" will from here on be considered an exploit. While it is true that this is not verifiable after the fact by way of logs, GMs are able to go ingame and monitor situations at will, and do it without anyone knowing. If we catch anyone doing this we will take the appropriate action against them. We therefore urge Titan and Mothership pilots to refrain from using their ships to bump ships out of POS forcefields, or risk facing punitive measures for exploiting.
All the best,
GM Grimmi Lead Game Master EVE Online Customer Support
If you read the original post you should be able to work out that this thread is quite clearly a response to the new item that you have quoted.
|

Treelox
Amarr Frontier Technologies
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:54:00 -
[16]
Originally by: The Economist If you read the original post you should be able to work out that this thread is quite clearly a response to the new item that you have quoted.
Yes I had figured that out, but since you didnt see fit to quote this, and since CCP hasnt seen fit to make this a post in their "information portal", I thought I would include it here. For those that hadnt yet noticed the new post in the "Players News Center"
Just think of it as my PSA for the day.
While POS bowling doesnt affect me, since I am an empire hugger, I have always thought that the practice was in poor form. I am glad they have made it an exploit, I just wish they would fix the code that allows it, since as GM Grimmi states, they have no way of checking it against logs. The only way the GM Team can do anything about it, is to catch you in the act. -- http://www./sigs/Treelox/sig.png [orange]signature removed (change the zombie gagging sig) - please email us (with the signature URL) if you want to know why - Pirlouit([email protected] |

Derovius Vaden
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:54:00 -
[17]
Originally by: The Economist
Originally by: Treelox you have your answer now
Originally by: "GM Grimmi" pos bowling exploit reported by GM Grimmi | 2007.05.30 16:35:04 | NEW Greetings,
The so-called "POS Bowling" will from here on be considered an exploit. While it is true that this is not verifiable after the fact by way of logs, GMs are able to go ingame and monitor situations at will, and do it without anyone knowing. If we catch anyone doing this we will take the appropriate action against them. We therefore urge Titan and Mothership pilots to refrain from using their ships to bump ships out of POS forcefields, or risk facing punitive measures for exploiting.
All the best,
GM Grimmi Lead Game Master EVE Online Customer Support
If you read the original post you should be able to work out that this thread is quite clearly a response to the new item that you have quoted.
You sir, have been wtfpwnbbq'ed by Grimmi. 
|

Il Reverendo
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 17:58:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Derovius Vaden You sir, have been wtfpwnbbq'ed by Grimmi. 
You sir, are a cretin. 
|

Chowdown
Gallente Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 18:00:00 -
[19]
Bumpy Bumpy will live in my heart for ever, I miss you and hope you return soon. <3 Your signature has been reomved, please email us with a link to your signature for clarification - Kreul Intentions ([email protected]) |

Wild Rho
Amarr GoonFleet
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 19:15:00 -
[20]
It's a good but risky thing as one case of someone getting into trouble when not using it or one person not getting into trouble for using it and you're going to have people screaming bloody murder. Especially with the conspiracy theory moods on Eve O.
|

Grihmstein
Amarr
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 22:44:00 -
[21]
So let me get this straight.
For it to be punishable it has to be witnessed by a GM.
So if you say had, using a complete hypothetical here, a really fast way to contact a GM to let them know to get to the scene to ban an offender this could really be a good thing.
Otherwise if, again using a purely hypothetical scenario, you had to go through say an in-game petition system it might be hours or days before a GM got back to you and then it might not be such a good thing.
Hard to say, hard to say.
|

Sentinel Eeex
Caldari Lords Of Amber
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 22:49:00 -
[22]
Yeah, if I want to go and take a ****, or make some food, or answer the phone/doorbell, or whatever else - I better logoff or move my ship into ship array, or cloak at safespot, because... why would I stay inside POS *shields*?
*snip* Don't troll with your signature. Follow the Forum Rules -Eldo Davip([email protected]) |

Jimer Lins
Gallente Sanctuary
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:06:00 -
[23]
So if someone gets banned while in a ship... is the ship lost to the game?
Or is their pod merely removed from it and it's left floating in space?
Because either way, I can see how it would kind of suck for your Titan pilot to get caught doing this. *banned* *Titan poof* or *banned* *Titan SNAG*

|

Nerf Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:17:00 -
[24]
Who's this Bob guy everybody is talking about nowadays?
|

WhitePhantom
Gallente Edenists
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:27:00 -
[25]
If your afraid of "BoB" being able to "contact" staff out of game, here is a really good suggestion, don't use the exploit.
BoB members have gone on record saying they only began to use it again AFTER another GM told another alliance it was NOT an exploit. This was only after they STOP using this said method, after they were told it WAS an exploit.
So its an EXPLOIT and everyone will stop using it, I assume everyone can play by the rules, and anyone that gets banned from doing it after knowing its against the rules should not trusted on their word.
|

ElCholo
Minmatar FarCry Inc Curse Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:27:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Jimer Lins So if someone gets banned while in a ship... is the ship lost to the game?
Or is their pod merely removed from it and it's left floating in space?
Because either way, I can see how it would kind of suck for your Titan pilot to get caught doing this. *banned* *Titan poof* or *banned* *Titan SNAG*

I don't think offenders should be banned .. they should simply have their super cap permanently confiscated, then have to answer to their alliance why they had it taken away. I think thats a fate worse than banning.
|

Nadarius Chrome
Celestial Horizon Corp. Valainaloce
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:42:00 -
[27]
Originally by: WhitePhantom BoB members have gone on record saying they only began to use it again AFTER another GM told another alliance it was NOT an exploit. This was only after they STOP using this said method, after they were told it WAS an exploit.
you might have to forgive people for not believing the meta-gaming anything-to-win alliance without question...  __________ The opinion(s) expressed above are mine alone and are not necessarily endorsed or supported by my Corporation or Alliance. |

Selena 001
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:48:00 -
[28]
I was under the impression that the PoS bubbles were being changed to act similarly to warp bubbles, if you dont have access to the PoS. You dont fly into it, then bounce off, you simply drop out of warp on the edge...
OFC, that could have just been said by someone for a giggle... but it sounds like a logical change... ___________
NATIONAL SARCASM DAY!! |

Innominate
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:52:00 -
[29]
signed Sig removed. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] with a link to your signature. - Elmo Pug
|

Aduna
Ore Mongers R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:57:00 -
[30]
Originally by: The Economist POS Bowling needs to be re-defined (again) as not being an exploit for two important reasons.
1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
2: The more ships there are on a grid, the more lag there is. Previously there was no way whatsoever to counter the massive lag generated at pos's by the countless ships carelessly left in space.[it has often been alleged of people that they leave said ships at pos purely to generate lag.] POS bowling gave the community a way to reduce the lag problems by removing the ships from the grid or forcing the offenders to use ship maintenance arrays for their intended purpose.
In summary, I don't know what provoked yet another policy change on this issue, but please seriously consider reverting to the previous ruling for the reasons stated above.
Cheers.
look ma, i'm posting in a BoB alt thread!!!
why am i not surprised that BoB is *****ing about the changes? it removes one of their exploi...er, intended game mechanic that's working ok.
|

Capt Rob
Minmatar Black Omega Security GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 23:57:00 -
[31]
i like the idea of POS bowling, but i feel it should be allowed for any ship below supercapitals. For supercaps theres no risk at all. You can do it in carriers and dreads but there is actually a possibility you can die.
|

Farham
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 00:34:00 -
[32]
Quote: If your afraid of "BoB" being able to "contact" staff out of game, here is a really good suggestion, don't use the exploit.
I don't even know how to respond to that...
Is that how bad it has gotten that people don't bother to even defend CCP from allegations of improper out of game communications?
Intrepid Crossing Diplomat and All Around Major Idiot |

Shinigami
Gallente Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 02:16:00 -
[33]
The problem is that you have people abusing the intended mechanics of the game. People weren't even using the storage structures. They would just place unmanned haulers for item storage. All risk is negated at this point without pos bowling.
"Is someone sieging your pos? It's not a problem because you can just warp away your stuff to safety after they go to bed. There's no reason to defend because all you will lose is a control tower." --- Eve Comedy Gallery.
|

Jarne
COMBINE Corporation G.U.A.R.D.
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 09:21:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Jarne on 31/05/2007 09:21:15 I still don't get it: Why doesn't CCP just change the POS shields in a way so they work like warp bubbles? Just don't let anyone enter the POS shields that is not allowed to. Ever. Can't be too hard technically...
One other thing I was wondering about: If maintenance arrays are the intended method of storing ships at a POS, why can't those ships be stored with full cargo? It's totally cumbersome to first store the cargo in the hangar array, then put the ship into the maintenance array. Let's not even talk about how to keep apart different people's cargo contents in the hangar. And why does the hangar array go offline when the POS is reinforced, but the maintenance array does not? Without the hangar working, the maintenance array becomes totally useless. Who wants to fly with empty ships? So, in reinforced mode, having some ships outside the maintenance array is a must. I can see that it is intended by CCP to access ships at a POS in reinforced mode, because the maintenance array is still online. I can see that right now, it is nevertheless unusable because ships can not be stored with full cargo, and the hangar array is offline in reinforced mode. So there is only one resort: Letting your ships float inside the POS shields...
And about the GM post: The statement is a first step, and I am happy about it. But without any means to enforce this new rule, nothing will change. I mean, I could try to FRAPS the POS bowling incident, but it normally occurs when the ship/POS owner is asleep, doesn't it? So again: Change the POS shield, so they aren't a "one way balloon" anymore, but a real rigid barrier. Please :). ---- *Please paste generic Szun Tzu quote of your choice here* |

i take
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:25:00 -
[35]
loled you most be so stoned :P loled its SO much an exsploit!!!
because exploits is something they didn't intend to put in so NO arguments will make it an feature instead of an exploit!..
ban the exploiters: suicide gank, pos bowling, lagmakers, can exploiting, etcetc etc
|

El'essar Viocragh
Minmatar FSK23
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:28:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Selena 001 I was under the impression that the PoS bubbles were being changed to act similarly to warp bubbles, if you dont have access to the PoS. You dont fly into it, then bounce off, you simply drop out of warp on the edge...
OFC, that could have just been said by someone for a giggle... but it sounds like a logical change...
Word has it you drop out of warp 15km outside of the shields on the testserver already if you don't have access. Not verified it myself though, so, grain of salt applies.
|

iqplayer
Caldari Dragon's Rage Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:46:00 -
[37]
Originally by: The Economist POS Bowling needs to be re-defined (again) as not being an exploit for two important reasons.
1: It forces people to use ship maintenance arrays; these were previously woefully underused. [this also gives everyone a very simple way to avoid being bowled....any ship losess to supercap bowling are directly attributable to sheer laziness rather than anything else]
2: The more ships there are on a grid, the more lag there is. Previously there was no way whatsoever to counter the massive lag generated at pos's by the countless ships carelessly left in space.[it has often been alleged of people that they leave said ships at pos purely to generate lag.] POS bowling gave the community a way to reduce the lag problems by removing the ships from the grid or forcing the offenders to use ship maintenance arrays for their intended purpose.
In summary, I don't know what provoked yet another policy change on this issue, but please seriously consider reverting to the previous ruling for the reasons stated above.
Cheers.
While I feel some sympathy with your second point about masses of unpiloted ships causing lag, that's really a totally seperate issue from bowling, and in cases where you can show evidence that it's done solely to cause lag (ie, masses of noob ships or shuttles) it can be petitioned. Yes, I realize it's very difficult to make that case, but that still doesn't have anything to do with bowling.
More important to the whole argument, is that your point #1 is totally flawed. It is impossible to compensate for POS bowling via the Ship Maintenance Array, because bowling works against piloted ships as well, with potentially devastating effects. This happened to me a while back, when a Titan pilot was trying to bump my Naglfar outside of the shields *while* I was in it. You cannot warp while moving above your max speed, so after leaving the shields you are quite vulnerable to fast moving tacklers until your ship slows to normal speeds - something that can take quite a while in a capital.
In any case, the whole situation was quite silly to begin with. Why have shields if they aren't there to protect you? You already have the ability to destroy the shields (and the POS), I don't see any reason why there needs to be a way to make ships inside the shields vulnerable. That is, after all, what shields are for......
|

iqplayer
Caldari Dragon's Rage Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:56:00 -
[38]
Edited by: iqplayer on 31/05/2007 14:58:09
Originally by: Shinigami The problem is that you have people abusing the intended mechanics of the game. People weren't even using the storage structures. They would just place unmanned haulers for item storage. All risk is negated at this point without pos bowling.
"Is someone sieging your pos? It's not a problem because you can just warp away your stuff to safety after they go to bed. There's no reason to defend because all you will lose is a control tower."
Maybe while we're at it, we need to make it so that as soon as one POS in a system is reinforced, all items inside an OP get locked down, and when the station is taken over, 50% are destroyed and 50% get handed over to the assaulting force??
I think it's just as ridiculous at the moment that anything you have stored in a POS is 100% vulnerable to a sneak attack in the middle of the night. While I'm sure you'd counter with the argument that you should defend the POS when it comes out of reinforced, the situation with the Capital Ship Array down in Bob's territory should illustrate very well that it's impossible for even a superior force to prevent a POS's destruction. As it stands now, items stored in POS's that cost Isk and effort to run are completely vulnerable, while items stored inside an OP are completely safe and can be evacuated. To me, this seems a little backwards.....
In any case, once again this is a completely seperate issue from Bowling. If there's a problem with unmanned ships in a POS, then that should be fixed seperately. Allowing one flaw to become a feature just to 'fix' another flaw.....well, that sounds silly to me.
|

Agent Li
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 14:59:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Ion Flux Ya know one of the main reason i liked eve was it looked great..played Great and when i saw pos bowling i was appalled......this one thing just ruined it
Bowling is stupid...ever watched a space movie and seen pos bowling....wait there is 5 deathstars lined up there....Right Han..we should bowl them....ok chewy......come on..this is exploit ...this is stupid..this is lame....lame lame lame and ccp should be ashamed of themselves for loosing control of this game....it justed seemed if they couldnt control it ...it wasnt an exploit.....nothing like sitting under the pos sheilds...try to stay safe and 15 Cap ships come in...i bounce out and get targeted..what fun ..NOT...( ya i know i suck at writing..)
EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT
Ion
Well, you don't see the Millenium Falcon bumping Star Destroyers to keep them from aligning to warp, either.
Usually, when something in Star Wars "bumps", the smaller ship explodes in a ball of flame... ------------------
"Don't be afraid to take advantage of your enemy's weaknesses. Becasuse winning is everything after all." |

bloomich
Trotter's Independent Traders Co
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:06:00 -
[40]
Edited by: bloomich on 31/05/2007 15:12:14
Originally by: Agent Li Well, you don't see the Millenium Falcon bumping Star Destroyers to keep them from aligning to warp, either.
Usually, when something in Star Wars "bumps", the smaller ship explodes in a ball of flame...
Incorrect. A Single A-Wing bumped a Super Star Destroyer into the deathstar. Watch the film for yourself!
|

Won Swunglow
Caldari Dead By Dawn
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 15:06:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Shinigami signed
lol just have a chat with the boss, it'll soon be forgoten about mate  --
|

Agent Li
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 16:16:00 -
[42]
Originally by: bloomich Edited by: bloomich on 31/05/2007 15:32:47
Originally by: Agent Li Well, you don't see the Millenium Falcon bumping Star Destroyers to keep them from aligning to warp, either.
Incorrect. A Single A-Wing bumped a Super Star Destroyer into the deathstar. Watch the film for yourself!
Yes, but the A-Wing made a nice little explosion and did actual damage to the Super Star Destroyer. ------------------
"Don't be afraid to take advantage of your enemy's weaknesses. Becasuse winning is everything after all." |

Phaedruss
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 16:55:00 -
[43]
If we could conveniently store ships in the SMA without having to unload everything from the cargo hold first, it might encourage more use of the SMA. On the other hand, I've seen ships being bowled out of a POS by a Titan while still being piloted too...
|

Shinigami
Gallente Reikoku Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 01:11:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Won Swunglow
Originally by: Shinigami signed
lol just have a chat with the boss, it'll soon be forgoten about mate 
POS bowling is a necessary evil just like ore stealing. Do I look like a mindless drone? --- Eve Comedy Gallery.
|

Krystian
Caldari No Quarter. Vae Victis.
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 08:17:00 -
[45]
This is just another fine example of the endless 'haxorz' metagaming that persists in the community. Every single type of game out there you got your rules twisting, min/max twits who just cant stop trying to ruin the fun for everyone else. Its so old and lame.
|

Voculus
E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 09:12:00 -
[46]
Edited by: Voculus on 01/06/2007 09:11:18 POS Bowling is just another ridiculous way to game the game. It's a clear exploit the game mechanics, and only serves to make Eve a worse game to play. So who does the OP belong to? Shrike or Orange Species? _________________________________________________________
|

Hoshi
Blackguard Brigade Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.06.01 11:15:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Jimer Lins So if someone gets banned while in a ship... is the ship lost to the game?
Or is their pod merely removed from it and it's left floating in space?
Because either way, I can see how it would kind of suck for your Titan pilot to get caught doing this. *banned* *Titan poof* or *banned* *Titan SNAG*

Ship and all assets that pilot is holding are frozen on the account. But I don't see the problem. If he was exploiting a know bug that he have been officially warned to not exploit then he deserves nothing else. ---------------------------------------- A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |