Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
326
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:20:00 -
[121] - Quote
all the forum's a stage, and all the men and women simply posters |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
326
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:21:00 -
[122] - Quote
some are born great posters, some achieve greatness of posting, and some have great posts thrust in their face |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4298
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:24:00 -
[123] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:and anything posted by "Tippia" is automatically BS by definition... So I guess I'll just ignore you. Oh dear, here we goGǪ
Ok, so you have no actual argument, only unfounded and unreasoned assertions without any backing?
Why is it a BS response to say that EVE isn't for certain people? What are these GÇ£bad mechanicsGÇ¥ you spak of? Why is EVE crap just because some areas are fully under players' control? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Ira Theos
Viziam Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:30:00 -
[124] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:I was thinking about just leaving this thread because I was making a genuine point about how stupid EVE and every other MMORPG's PvP is but the amount of rage coming from mainly goons was too funny to resist so I'll respond to a particular phrase that keeps being thrown around these forums without any real meaning called "Instant Gratification" here's why they're full of crap.
. These players are claiming that I, as a miner am taking the instant gratification route when everyone agrees mining is tedious, boring and you don't get a lot of ISK from it
. These players fly ships specifically designed to gank people for easy kills in ships, they don't go around picking fights they can't win ( I thought EVE PvP was supposed to be balanced, if it wasn't why couldn't you go and pick a fight with someone supposedly more powerful than you? How can they be more powerful than you in the first place just because they paid subscription a bit longer? It doesn't make sense ;) ) and they gate camp stargates which are CCP made chokepoints designed to funnel players through 0.0 for easy kills
. We are fully aware there are botters in 0.0 space that alliances own, this is cheating, so they aren't even playing the game honestly
. You boast about the risk in 0.0 space, yet people say once you get past the gate camps it is almost completely empty, so this means as long as the gate camps are up indiscriminately ganking every stranger who tries to pass through it will be safer than high sec space
. Rewards are much bigger, while this is debatable especially with incursions being recently put in, if you own the space and are ganking anyone else except your friends then you pretty much get all the rare ore, rats and missions you could ever want of course there are incursions as well to consider in 0.0 space though I don't know whether it gives out more or less ISK than high security
. It has been reported 0.0 alliances used exploits in EVE without telling CCP about them so yet again they could cheat their way to billions of ISK without having to do any of the grinding
Now I know you lot need to take your pent up sexual frustration out on something, but it's pretty sad when you decide to make several pages of thread quite literally almost at once and then try to discredit said person by claiming "EVE is not for you, noob, instant gratification player" etc. etc. when you all go around cheating through the game and when you find no ones playing by your rules anymore because low and behold this game is still a sandbox. You decide to take your frustration out on the only area left where players who just want to play the game are left.
Valei, you are pretty much SPOT ON ON ALL POINTS. I've played Eve for six years, run everything I can with my 100 million plus skillpoints, been everywhere from Jita to Deep Zero as neighbors of BOB... and I agree with everything you have said here. Why am I saying this as a "Bitter Vet" when I am supposed to line up with the rest of Vet's who are sucking tit off the RMT Plantations? Because I hate the Plantations and every twisted stupid mechanic of CCP's that they have used to totally ruin the sovereignty game in Zero. It is sad what they have done to Eve. It's killing subscription growth and killing revenue. Ultimately it will kill Eve. In my case, Eve is no long worthy of my real cash and I just pay for PLEX with isk. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
326
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:34:00 -
[125] - Quote
plexing earns ccp more money than subbing |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4298
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:35:00 -
[126] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:I hate the Plantations and every twisted stupid mechanic of CCP's that they have used to totally ruin the sovereignty game in Zero. GǪsuch as?
Quote:It is sad what they have done to Eve. It's killing subscription growth and killing revenue. Yes. It was called GÇ£abandoning core EVE for Incarna and other dream projects.GÇ¥
Quote:Eve is no long worthy of my real cash and I just pay for PLEX with isk. Good. That means you're supporting CCP even more than before. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Ira Theos
Viziam Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:39:00 -
[127] - Quote
sYnc Vir wrote:Null Sec is not for pvp. Its for Sov Blob warfare and Nullbearing, with that o so overpowered moon mining.
If you actually want to pvp theirs this wierd ass place called Low Sec. Embrace it before ccp kills it off for good.
THIS is also the truth!
(Again, I'm not the only one that thinks current mechanics are crap!) |

Ira Theos
Viziam Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:48:00 -
[128] - Quote
Killstealing wrote:plexing earns ccp more money than subbing
No, actually they don't because if I was still paying cash instead (of buying plex with game isk I earned "ingame"), they would not only be receiving the money somebody else paid them for the PLEX, but they would be receiving my sub payment.
As it is now, they are only receiving the other guy's money who paid for the PLEX I use. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4298
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:50:00 -
[129] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:As it is now, they are only receiving the other guy's money who paid for the PLEX I use. GǪwhich they wouldn't get if you were subbing and didn't provide a reason for the other guy to buy that PLEX.
So yes, they are indeed earning more money form you now than when you subbed.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Sanadras Riahn
Molten Metalworks
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 01:51:00 -
[130] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote: As it is now, they are only receiving the other guy's money who paid for the PLEX I use.
Which costs them more money to purchase than a usual sub. So instead of getting your sub and the PLEX-purchaser's sub, they're technically getting both subs plus five additional USDs. "This is our way of wisdom, warrior. To be true. To be full. To include our hearts in every aspect of what we do. --- Let those that fly cold numbers be the Amarr. We fly better than that."---Alica Wildfire, inscribed on the inside and outer shell of Sanadras' Capsule. |
|

Richter Enderas
Coronal Core Research Inc Wild-Cards
16
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 02:11:00 -
[131] - Quote
I went to nullsec once.
Actually twice.
You see, I've been a carebear for as long as I played eve. I thought that I should stop being a babby pubby tearchild, and get my feet wet by doing the same 15 missions I do in empire, except out of CONCORD's protective eyes and away from the oh-so-helpful tradehubs of yonder.
First I thought, "hm, I could go to Fountain. no one really goes there, and serpentis seems pretty low-tier and such a good place to start. plus i can be a pirate pretending to be doing pirate things ps yarr"
This was the end result:
http://www.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12069322 http://www.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12069234
All was quiet until I ran into a blob of thirty-odd angry Russians impacting the colon of a poor TNT battlecruiser. I was unable to escape in time and as such, I became a skidmark and woke up in Essence. I saw my first bubble, and discovered the importance of keeping your clone up-to-date in addition to reading local.
This did not deter me! After some more proper research on DOTLAN, I chose (poorly) my next location: Blood Raiders, in the wonderful region of Delve. They have neat looking ships, relatively close to empire even though it really isn't that close, and they are brooding and dark and whatnot. That's cool, right?
I made it there unlike my Fountain excursion. After doing two missions (DED comes out to 0.0 to get killed? wot) I gained the ire of a European battlecruiser. Ten minutes later I was gifted with this present on the other side of the gate:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12074985
They didn't get my pod. I discovered that "gf" does not mean "good fight" but has yet a much more colorful meaning. After a few hours not playing I decided to cut my losses and do my best to scoot back to empire in a very, very, very, very badly fitted kestrel. I ran into some more angry kids and became yet another skidmark.
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12075933 http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=12075932
I don't know what a banderlog is, but it killed me. RIP
This did not deter me. I managed to at least make it there in one piece, so regardless of what my next destination is I will make it and continue my progression. 0.0 was neat even though I spent most of it dying and lost far, far more than I obtained.
After I finish with my strategic cruiser training and extra jumpclone prepping, I want the LP gains, sucka.
0.0 pirate haven, we comin' for you sucka.
tl'dr op is just scurred. I went, I shot some rats, I died. I am returning.
ps i posted those lossmails manually, and I have no shame. |

Vyl Vit
Cambio Enterprises
191
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 02:45:00 -
[132] - Quote
I appreciate what you're saying and have to add: These people will never learn.
There's two devices which make fighting an absurdity, the main one being the gargantuanly unfeasible in any reality warp scrambler. You can magically intervene into the core of a ship's workings with a device that's so surgical it doesn't affect your own. Preposterous doesn't touch it. (Anyone with any sense has already left town.) But, sure enough, it's been snatched up and made the chokepoint of the entire SANDBOX game here. The crybabies that will now scream about its validity use it as a crutch (as that's all it can hope to be) but would NEVER admit they do. They've formulated their entire play style around it, and in actuality IT rules them. They don't rule it. (It's a game! It's not real life! It's a game! It's not real life. There, I made their argument for them.)
Having to yourself complete mission objectives to use a warp gate, but just anyone who comes along can use it, too, makes this feature a true object of ridicule, and makes the game ridiculous. CCP brags about no instances in the game. So...why did I have to complete a mission objective to use the gate, but the gankers didn't? (Try to make some sense when you dispute this, please. The previous arguments fall like cow patties...plop!)
Presently the low sec/null sec crowd in the main only want victims out there. They'll use their ONLY USEABLE device...hell, even draining someone's cap without draining your own at the same time is ridiculous on the face of it...and they'll use it WELL - just the way someone can use a pair of crutches well after about three weeks.
So pat yourselves on the back you mighty warriors out there. Pretend you know what you're doing. It's the law.
Anyone with a knowledge of naval warfare KNOWS the main problem is finding the enemy and pinning him down. Neither of those is certain, and when it's accomplished it's UNIQUE, and not the rule. PROVE you can actually fight. Lose the warp scrams and webefiers. Use some sort of SKILL, then brag.
I can see, OP, why you're miffed.
To her it doesn't matter much.-á It's chasms have been leapt, and she leans upon the skepticism of her chosen fate. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4299
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 02:51:00 -
[133] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:CCP brags about no instances in the game. So...why did I have to complete a mission objective to use the gate, but the gankers didn't? What do instances have to do with it? Also: because you've already unlocked it (unless it's one of those gates where they, too, have to do so).
As for the scrambler: because history has shown that without such a mechanic, too few fights happen, which is a bad thing in a game where fights need to happen. Even so, there are still counters to it, should you be so inclinedGǪ GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Vyl Vit
Cambio Enterprises
191
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 02:59:00 -
[134] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Vyl Vit wrote:CCP brags about no instances in the game. So...why did I have to complete a mission objective to use the gate, but the gankers didn't? What do instances have to do with it? Also: because you've already unlocked it (unless it's one of those gates where they, too, have to do so). As for the scrambler: because history has shown that without such a mechanic, too few fights happen, which is a bad thing in a game where fights need to happen. Even so, there are still counters to it, should you be so inclinedGǪ
Again, you ably point out the obvious to which I reply, "So...?"
To her it doesn't matter much.-á It's chasms have been leapt, and she leans upon the skepticism of her chosen fate. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4301
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:10:00 -
[135] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:Again, you ably point out the obvious to which I reply, "So...?" GǪso your questions have obvious answers. There's nothing preposterous, ridiculous, or even slightly odd about it.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp
256
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:13:00 -
[136] - Quote
Valei Khurelem wrote:Jason McCoy wrote:wow blame ccp for your stupidity
another one, jeeze its friday night, and im stuck at work. Someone get me a double rum and coke plz. Okay then, how do you beat a tech 2 broadsword with a tech 1 destroyer?
Uhm. You don't. That's kind of the idea. But a Pvp fit thrasher with a MWD should be able to make it interesting.
That being said. This is a very harsh, very cold, very unforgiving game. Traveling alone cuts your margin for error to zero. It's called an MMO for a very specific reason. It's designed with cooperative play in mind. It baffles me how many people do what you did, and post what you posted. Frankly it was probably only the Broadsword you saw because thats all the guy and his friends wanted you to see. Null is the big leagues buddy they only people there are idiots like you who day trip there and the hardcore who know what they are doing. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

Daneirkus Auralex
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:15:00 -
[137] - Quote
1. Turn 18 or older 2. Join a good corp 3. Learn how to fly your internet spaceship 4. Stop dying as much |

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
309
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:29:00 -
[138] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:Tippia wrote:Vyl Vit wrote:CCP brags about no instances in the game. So...why did I have to complete a mission objective to use the gate, but the gankers didn't? What do instances have to do with it? Also: because you've already unlocked it (unless it's one of those gates where they, too, have to do so). As for the scrambler: because history has shown that without such a mechanic, too few fights happen, which is a bad thing in a game where fights need to happen. Even so, there are still counters to it, should you be so inclinedGǪ Again, you ably point out the obvious to which I reply, "So...?"
Although I enjoy the quality and tone of your posting in this verbal written sparring of interesting ideas, I believe that the level of reasoning used to create your stance regarding the ambiguity of these two devices in a sense, and sadly, overflows into the realm of Elementary Particles.
Why? Since as Above so below, your whole point is based on an incredibly empirical stance that despite criticizing the "reality"of the current game mechanics (embodied in said modules) has no solution possible within the construement of the game itself as it is NOW.
In short, you are simply escalating the premise of your statement to a point that no matter what , you will always be able to say "So... ?". it's like a T2 version of a stubborn kid refusing to concede a point.
For your proposal and critique to have a valid resolution would require an act of such supernatural stature (removing these two modules for example) that it would simply invalide the current field of play.
it's a bit obtuse and terse, and when seeing it for that perspective, it's a SAFE assumption you can use in practically any argument WITHIN the game to leave any discussion with yourself unscathed.
There is simply no definite answer to your proposal, because the moment it's taken away (say, again, by removing said modules) the whole ground upon which you based this is gone and destroyed rendering your statement void.
Since the core play mechanic of eve is FIXED and KNOWABLE (unlike our universe, at the moment anyway, I can always hope for mankind to evolve) it's easy to foresee without any real degree of effort that the CONTINUITY OF GAME BREAKING CYLES developed by the community and userbase will present itself again. CCP has shown an incredible amount of naivete every time they release an expansion (I can't blame them, don't think any logical sane thinking person can) to realize the way the userbase will TWIST, expand and CAPITALIZE upon any quirk of a fixed mechanic.
By extrapolating from this, your stance will easily be mutated eventually by someone else to exemplify a perfect clone of your statement regarding ANY OTHER TYPE OF MECHANIC OR DEVICE.
The real force behind what you say will remain ALWAYS as MMO's are per se FINITE, they have clear limits and a fixed set of rules that CCP continually has to work UPOn them using them as a GROUND.
This my friend is the whole Issue regarding MMO Development. Most companies believe BALANCE is achieved by tuning up or down certain mechanics, where in reality, MAN, the RACE OF MAN is inherently chaotic and innovative, so BALANCE is a dream to hope for and will always be impossible to reach to a form in which a consensus of everyone involved feels satisfied.
Today your two modules, tomorrow the 3 new types of turrets, in 1 year the new mechanic that allows jumping without gates, and on and on and on.
Your stance if done innocently is unsolvable and also, like CCP"s a bit ... naive, if done intentionally it's a weak attempt at obtaining a personal iota of relevance within an enclosed frame of mind for the sake of doing it unable to be resolved by anyone but you. All of this is neither wrong nor correct, nor bad nor good, but loved to analyze your stance as it is a pretty common occurrence during psychotherapy, the point of encapsulation and the moment you can begin a small counterattack against the ego of the client to develop new strains of possible outcomes whose only purpose is HEALING.
So in short and to make this more easy
TLDR: What you propose is futile, as time and the game has proven over and over, someone somewhere will find a loophole exploitable by anyone. Removing such "perceptions of unfair advantage" only further complicate matters as there is no real solution EVER achieved. it's a never-ending cycle of thought processes that lead nowhere.
Unfortunately, I can only, like any other human being can point out certain issues, but I believe what modern MMO development needs is a new theorem and paradigm of thinking, on which instead of looking for BALANCE and raw data of most used ship/module/tactic we create a sort of Modular diagram that is able to keep a perfect geometrical form no matter what angle or side you see it... It will always be "balanced" even when pieces within the module are taken out of it or added to it. Circle thinking in design has shown to lead nowhere, as obvious as it might sound.
But that would be delving into a forbidden field and I think I might lose people at this point on what I'm trying to Imply ... Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |

Terajima Kazumi
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
51
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:30:00 -
[139] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:IAnyone with a knowledge of naval warfare KNOWS the main problem is finding the enemy and pinning him down. Neither of those is certain, and when it's accomplished it's UNIQUE, and not the rule. PROVE you can actually fight. Lose the warp scrams and webefiers. Use some sort of SKILL, then brag.
I can see, OP, why you're miffed. Aside from jumping through gates, which you shouldn't be going through without a scout unless you're in something small and fast, it's nearly impossible to get caught when you do not want to be caught (so long as you don't make a mistake). Prove you can actually survive. Use some sort of skill. Then you won't have to whine. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
328
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:37:00 -
[140] - Quote
Ira Theos wrote:Killstealing wrote:plexing earns ccp more money than subbing No, actually they don't because if I was still paying cash instead (of buying plex with game isk I earned "ingame"), they would not only be receiving the money somebody else paid them for the PLEX, but they would be receiving my sub payment. As it is now, they are only receiving the other guy's money who paid for the PLEX I use. 6 years in eve and still no idea of how plexes work, hoo boy. Better get out, this game is not for your kind~ |
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1429
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 03:48:00 -
[141] - Quote
Look at all these high sec pubbies pretending they know something about nullsec. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

met worst
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:39:00 -
[142] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Look at all these high sec pubbies pretending they know something about nullsec. Miss Harlot
You will find many alts posting who DO have experience of nullsec - and left.
They left because they felt they would be part of something big and fascinating when in fact they were no more than a cog in the RMT machine.
It's all a numbers game with quaint terminology such as "fight the good fight" etc... a metaphor for the lords to state "my *** is bigger than yours" as they raid someone elses turf for a totally different motive than their sheep believe.
Yes boys, fight for FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY yadda ya - TRADE and COMMERCE are in fact the motive.
To whit, the motivation for Goons taking MORE space is what? Politics? Feelgood? Breaking Eve?
Or RMT? |

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
99
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:54:00 -
[143] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote: Anyone with a knowledge of naval warfare KNOWS the main problem is finding the enemy and pinning him down. Neither of those is certain, and when it's accomplished it's UNIQUE, and not the rule. PROVE you can actually fight. Lose the warp scrams and webefiers. Use some sort of SKILL, then brag.
.
Real iife warfare comparisons mean nothing. The other day i was being taunted by a frigate warping off from undock and back. This is in 0.0 mind you. Found i couldn't scram the little thing, even with my sebo II scripted for sig res. Brainstorm, fit my tackler with 2 short points for a total of 4 points. Result: frigate, pod and tears due to pod being worth just under 100 m isk.
This is me bragging, by the way. Would you like to know ALL the counters to webs and scrams? Bet you would.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Vyl Vit
Cambio Enterprises
191
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:05:00 -
[144] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Vyl Vit wrote: Anyone with a knowledge of naval warfare KNOWS the main problem is finding the enemy and pinning him down. Neither of those is certain, and when it's accomplished it's UNIQUE, and not the rule. PROVE you can actually fight. Lose the warp scrams and webefiers. Use some sort of SKILL, then brag.
.
Real iife warfare comparisons mean nothing. The other day i was being taunted by a frigate warping off from undock and back. This is in 0.0 mind you. Found i couldn't scram the little thing, even with my sebo II scripted for sig res. Brainstorm, fit my tackler with 2 short points for a total of 4 points. Result: frigate, pod and tears due to pod being worth just under 100 m isk. This is me bragging, by the way. Would you like to know ALL the counters to webs and scrams? Bet you would. Funny. You always say that...real life warfare...blah blah. You know WHY? 'Cause you have your CRUTCH, that's why. If you had to do it for real, your results would be palpably WORSE than the best naval commanders of history since you haven't ever DONE it and haven't got a clue HOW. Is it that difficult to figure out?
The frigate was taunting me.
Counters to web/scram are beside the point...and, look at the Goonwaffle pretending to understand something that's difficult.
To her it doesn't matter much.-á It's chasms have been leapt, and she leans upon the skepticism of her chosen fate. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1429
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:10:00 -
[145] - Quote
met worst wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Look at all these high sec pubbies pretending they know something about nullsec. Miss Harlot You will find many alts posting who DO have experience of nullsec - and left. They left because they felt they would be part of something big and fascinating when in fact they were no more than a cog in the RMT machine. If you are in a corp or alliance where you feel like a cog in an RMT machine then leave it and join another one. Anybody who thinks that all nullsec alliances are the same is an idiot.
I'm not saying there are no bad alliances in nullsec but people who join one and get discouraged and then give up are the last people that should be commenting on the state of 0.0.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Chopper Rollins
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
99
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:35:00 -
[146] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:Chopper Rollins wrote:Vyl Vit wrote: Anyone with a knowledge of naval warfare KNOWS the main problem is finding the enemy and pinning him down. Neither of those is certain, and when it's accomplished it's UNIQUE, and not the rule. PROVE you can actually fight. Lose the warp scrams and webefiers. Use some sort of SKILL, then brag.
.
Real iife warfare comparisons mean nothing. The other day i was being taunted by a frigate warping off from undock and back. This is in 0.0 mind you. Found i couldn't scram the little thing, even with my sebo II scripted for sig res. Brainstorm, fit my tackler with 2 short points for a total of 4 points. Result: frigate, pod and tears due to pod being worth just under 100 m isk. This is me bragging, by the way. Would you like to know ALL the counters to webs and scrams? Bet you would. Funny. You always say that...real life warfare...blah blah. You know WHY? 'Cause you have your CRUTCH, that's why. If you had to do it for real, your results would be palpably WORSE than the best naval commanders of history since you haven't ever DONE it and haven't got a clue HOW. Is it that difficult to figure out? The frigate was taunting me. Counters to web/scram are beside the point...and, look at the Goonwaffle pretending to understand something that's difficult.
If I had to do what for real? Blow up a spaceship? What the hell are you on about?
Also, you don't know me, where i've been or what i've done and you don't know null sec, so criticisms of either don't count, coming from you.
Love my scrams n webs, props to hero tackling newbs in T1 frigs that secure T2 kills.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1503
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:52:00 -
[147] - Quote
i was solo roaming in ~MY HOUND~ and i ran into a sensor boosting hurricane. i chuckled, decloaked and started firing torps at him
he instalocked me and volleyed me with his 720s that is COMPLETELY UNFAIR aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa |

met worst
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 05:57:00 -
[148] - Quote
Andski wrote:i was solo roaming in ~MY HOUND~ and i ran into a sensor boosting hurricane. i chuckled, decloaked and started firing torps at him
he instalocked me and volleyed me with his 720s that is COMPLETELY UNFAIR aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Goon
Solo
Lie |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1503
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 06:00:00 -
[149] - Quote
why would I play eve online (a world-class spaceship game lol) solo when i can invite any number of my jabber bros to join me in playing eve online
answer that |

met worst
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 06:10:00 -
[150] - Quote
Andski wrote:why would I play eve online (a world-class spaceship game lol) solo when i can invite any number of my jabber bros to join me in playing eve online
answer that Derp.
Answered. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |