| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Carniflex
Caldari
Fallout Research
Fallout Project
   |
Posted - 2007.07.23 09:52:00 -
[91]
 Originally by: Matthew
Originally by: Carniflex
Nothing in patch notes about POS E-War batteries fix. Is it still planned but just did not make it to 2.2 or did but just not added to patch notes?
(Can't remeber from top of my head who, but one of devs stated that they are aware of the issue and looking into it. Issue being E-War battery scan resolution and some 'problems' coming from that, like ECM battery cykle time 7.5 sec and loking time for next target 45 sec on battleship in case of faction battery).
It's not in these patchnotes because this is patch 2.1, not 2.2. As far as I can tell, 2.1 is going to be a big code update, with 2.2 following with the content updates once they know the code update isn't doing anything too untoward.
Oops. Sorry  I really should drink more cofee before I start ranting  Now that I look at the title it is indeed 2.1 not 2.2 patch.
|
Helen Sobell
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 14:10:00 -
[92]
Originally by: Matthew
Originally by: Carniflex
Nothing in patch notes about POS E-War batteries fix. Is it still planned but just did not make it to 2.2 or did but just not added to patch notes?
(Can't remeber from top of my head who, but one of devs stated that they are aware of the issue and looking into it. Issue being E-War battery scan resolution and some 'problems' coming from that, like ECM battery cykle time 7.5 sec and loking time for next target 45 sec on battleship in case of faction battery).
It's not in these patchnotes because this is patch 2.1, not 2.2. As far as I can tell, 2.1 is going to be a big code update, with 2.2 following with the content updates once they know the code update isn't doing anything too untoward.
not been a forum ***** can you point me in the direction as to where you got the information that makes you think this is a code update and that content update is to follow?
|
|
CCP kieron
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 15:51:00 -
[93]
It would appear some members of the community are missing the point behind the inclusion of cowbell in the patch notes. Like the 'Easter Egg' comments added to the patch notes for Revelations II, these additions are an attempt to bring some humor to a normally boring and technical document. This is also why some of the note entries, such as the one concerning mechanical engineering agents (yes there are more agents coming), are expanded or put into an RP context.
kieron
Director of Community Relations, EVE Online
EVE Online, CCP Games
Email/Netfang
Look Ma, I'm in a Dev thread! Oh wait... |
|
Helen Sobell
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 17:00:00 -
[94]
Originally by: CCP kieron
It would appear some members of the community are missing the point behind the inclusion of cowbell in the patch notes. Like the 'Easter Egg' comments added to the patch notes for Revelations II, these additions are an attempt to bring some humor to a normally boring and technical document. This is also why some of the note entries, such as the one concerning mechanical engineering agents (yes there are more agents coming), are expanded or put into an RP context.
cowbell also hoepfully distracts us from the lack of other fixes we are eagerly hoping for eh?
|
Anaalys Fluuterby
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 19:08:00 -
[95]
Originally by: Jalsharra
Well the new patch that was the rage of this forum has been a dismal failure. I went to go mining only to discover that my usual mining gear can't be used because it uses too much power. Then I find that I can't target rocks more than 10k away from me and the strip miner has a range of 15k..... What the?? Oh and to top it all off it now takes 30 sec to get out of a station in order to go mining in the first place.As for doing missions, no way I'm risking that.
???
I do hope that you aren't talking about the De-Sync patch we are all excited about. You know, the one that doesn't release until TOMORROW?
WTS: Clue
<----------->
Factional Warfare:
The LowSec wars which never happened. |
Lodew
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 19:31:00 -
[96]
There are 3 things I am still eagerly awaiting to see in the patch notes. If you could give us an update I would be very happy.
1> When will eve take full use of Video Cards?
2> When will eve take full use of multi-core systems (especially with how many are out there now)
3> When will eve take full use of Physx cards?
Those 3 things would probably help cut down a LARGE portion of the lag being experienced right now ;)
|
Anja Ninja
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 22:00:00 -
[97]
What you're experiencing is server side lag, not client side lag. |
5n4keyes
Sacred Templars
DeStInY.
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 22:27:00 -
[98]
Will new alliance logos be included in this patch?
|
Fabienne Jax
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 22:38:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Anja Ninja
What you're experiencing is server side lag, not client side lag.
No, he's actually very right to question the client lag / performance. I experience very random and quite severe fps drop, anywhere from 90 fps w/ dual clients all the way down to about 2 or 3 fps while sitting idle in a low pop solar system. My machine is indeed a dual-core, and graphic performance is by no means sub-par. By choice I choose to run EVE windowed w/ graphics settings at minimum and this fps drop still occurs. Usually all it takes is a quick qraphics setting change (fi, screen resolution) to bring the fps back up to normal, but that is a big IF I have the patience to wait for the client to respond.
That is not server lag.
But as I understand, any performance implementation to address current hardware architecture is slated for Rev3.
|
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 22:46:00 -
[100]
Originally by: sci0gon
i hope you guys are looking over this thread to see if there are any other things that can be done on a small scale
The update was finalised before the weekend and no changes were made since then. But we read all comments in this and other threads and will study them for possible inclusion in future patches. I apologise if this is too vague but I don't have details on fixes from the content department and can't comment on software fixes until I see them actually pass through QA.
Originally by: 5n4keyes
Will new alliance logos be included in this patch?
No. The patch notes are actually an accurate list, with the PGO Stackless Python 2.5 being the most important update in this patch and the desynchronisation issue the most important fix.
Originally by: foresaken 1
I wonder when ccp will address the vista os issues? It doesn't seem as tho they are going to with this round of patches....
Which Vista OS issues? Please clarify.
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Lodew
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 22:56:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Anja Ninja
What you're experiencing is server side lag, not client side lag.
I beg to differ. When it is in a low Population system and there is a noticable drop in FPS that would not be caused by Server Lag. Server Side Lag will affect the updates but the graphics would still be fluid only the data would be behind for example.
You are flying along and suddenly end up in warp. That is server side lag. Very distinct differences.
|
Fabienne Jax
|
Posted - 2007.07.23 23:15:00 -
[102]
Originally by: foresaken 1
I wonder when ccp will address the vista os issues? It doesn't seem as tho they are going to with this round of patches....
Please see this thread, particularly lines 28, 29 of the author's post. (If I counted right. Whatever. Just look for the big "NOTE" for Vista users.)
Patience, friend. It's not a bad idea to postpone a Microsoft OS until at least SP1.
|
Neko Sornan
eXceed Inc.
INVICTUS.
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 05:54:00 -
[103]
Quote:
Agents studying mechanical engineering returned to school for certification renewal. They have completed their studies and are accepting projects.
Anyone had luck with his decryptors on this? |
foresaken 1
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 08:14:00 -
[104]
The issues i've been experiencing. As well as other pilots I have spoken with that use vista os.
That way points cancel themselves out after several systems.
When logging on. The the game window size is very distorted ( I just recntly bought a larger wide screen monitor ) and will not retain the settings I put in.
Items window and chat window are doing the same thing as far as not retaining the last setting ( size ) used.
I've been experiencing these problems since Rev 2. They are minor but very frustrating.
Thank you for any info or help.
|
Mashie Saldana
Hooligans Of War
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 08:36:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Lodew
There are 3 things I am still eagerly awaiting to see in the patch notes. If you could give us an update I would be very happy.
1> When will eve take full use of Video Cards?
2> When will eve take full use of multi-core systems (especially with how many are out there now)
3> When will eve take full use of Physx cards?
Those 3 things would probably help cut down a LARGE portion of the lag being experienced right now ;)
1> The DX10 version of the Trinity engine will hopefully support and use displacement mapping which means the geometry on ships and such will be generated by the GPU instead of the CPU. I doubt that will be used on the DX9 version.
2 > Hopefully with the Trinity engine as well, nothing specific mentioned by the devs in regards to how many cores that will be supported. When I tried to find out I was told they couldn't talk about it yet.
3> Most likely never, my Physx card will end up in the sparepart bin next time I upgrade this system thanks to the utterly lack of game support.
We're sorry, something happened.
|
|
CCP Explorer
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 09:12:00 -
[106]
Originally by: foresaken 1
That waypoints cancel themselves out after several systems. When logging on. The the game window size is very distorted (I just recently bought a larger wide screen monitor) and will not retain the settings I put in. Items window and chat window are doing the same thing as far as not retaining the last setting ( size ) used.
Have you read this KB article and followed its suggestions?
Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson
Software Director
EVE Online, CCP Games |
|
Eraggan Sadarr
Caldari
Phoenix Tribe
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 11:12:00 -
[107]
Edited by: Eraggan Sadarr on 24/07/2007 11:12:57
Info window keep position checkbox (the effect of it being checked) is not working anymore!
The error was introduced in the first rev II patch.
I have posted 2 bug reports on the subject and they both were dismissed:
Quote:
Thank you for your bugreport - ID:41309 Title: Info windows not keeping position.
The problem you have described as an intended game feature, and not a bug.
Your bugreport has been closed.
And apart from being bad english, i really don't understand how the removal of a feature without removing the switch (checkbox), can be an intended feature??
Please check the bug report id 41309 for a full explanation.
|
SillyWaif
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 11:37:00 -
[108]
Originally by: CCP kieron
It would appear some members of the community are missing the point behind the inclusion of cowbell in the patch notes. Like the 'Easter Egg' comments added to the patch notes for Revelations II, these additions are an attempt to bring some humor to a normally boring and technical document. This is also why some of the note entries, such as the one concerning mechanical engineering agents (yes there are more agents coming), are expanded or put into an RP context.
Maybe the players like to be taken seriously and prefer lists of bug fixes over your taste of humor ...
|
Aelicitia
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 11:45:00 -
[109]
Originally by: SillyWaif
Maybe the players like to be taken seriously and prefer lists of bug fixes over your taste of humor ...
Maybe you should stop taking a video game so seriously and try to laugh at humor like the rest of us. You don't speak for anybody but yourself.
|
Matthew
Caldari
BloodStar Technologies
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:00:00 -
[110]
Originally by: Helen Sobell
not been a forum ***** can you point me in the direction as to where you got the information that makes you think this is a code update and that content update is to follow?
The patchnotes and porkbelly's blog suggest to me that 2.1 is a code update, simply because they talk a lot about programming-related stuff, and very little about content.
The content devs seem to have "Fixed in 2.2" and "Coming in 2.2" set up as hotkeys, judging from how much they've been posting it around various sections of the forums, leading me to believe that 2.2 will have a significant content element to it.
There's also specific posts like this one where 2.2 is referred to as the next "static data patch". Static data is all the stuff that defines the basic properties of the game world - e.g. it's what defines a condor as having 25MW grid, or says that starbase EWar modules only have 10mm scan resolution. It's pretty much what we get out as the data export CCP publishes.
Pretty much every content change is going to require some change to the static data, so it's reasonable to assume that a patch with a static data element to it is likely to include content changes.
Originally by: Mashie Saldana
1> The DX10 version of the Trinity engine will hopefully support and use displacement mapping which means the geometry on ships and such will be generated by the GPU instead of the CPU. I doubt that will be used on the DX9 version.
The current trinity engine still uses some software shaders afaik (hardware shaders simply didn't exist back when trinity was first written). Both the DX9 and DX10 versions of Trinity 2 will be making full use of the capabilities of DirectX, so they'll both shift the graphics load to the GPU. The only difference will be that the DX10 users get some extra spiffy effects that the DX9 people either won't see, or will take a big performance hit to enable because they'll need to be emulated (kinda like all the other games released in the last few years that allowed you to scale back the ShaderModel version etc based on your hardware).
-------
There is no magic Wand of Fixing, and it is not powered by forum whines. |
TheJediDK
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:01:00 -
[111]
Originally by: Ionia
No mining upgrades fix again? It isnt a complicated issue... just turn them on.
Originally by: Ionia
PLEASE FIX MINING UPGRADES
Fixes about mining is not that important. You must remember that 9 out of 10 dont think of mining as important. Doing missions and other combat things are more important as more people do em. All about pleasing the majority. With that said i agree. FIX THE MINING UPGRADES! It would be wrong to constantly just ignore miners in this game. Though of course everything else is more important at least just do something easy as turning on mining upgrades =P
Oh well.. They at it atm and in a hour im home from work and do some mining.. With or without upgrades heh.. Just had to voice my mind..
Jed
|
Callthetruth
Caldari
Drunken Ratbags Inc
New Eve Order
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:02:00 -
[112]
ok cant find the actual patch is it available for download yet
|
Toda Toranaga
Gallente
Golden Apples of the Sun
Soldiers of the Forgotten Abyss
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:23:00 -
[113]
Originally by: Ciphero
Originally by: Toda Toranaga
Originally by: Callthetruth
ok cant find the actual patch is it available for download yet
Yeah, whats up with that? I started the client, and when the update process didn't start automatically, I went to the patches section of this website, downloaded the latest one on the list, and it tells me when I try to install it that I allready HAVE that patch. So where is it?
Hint: it's not been released yet.
*Toada kicks himself in the teeth*
Well, no ****, huh?
*spits a loose, bloody tooth down the drain*
________________________________________________
"Notice: Strip Miner I deactivates because you were AFK smoking a ciggarette."
|
Daywalker Hawk
Caldari
Haluter-Gilde
Freelancer Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:24:00 -
[114]
Edited by: Daywalker Hawk on 24/07/2007 12:28:50
patch is out
hmm got patch size 7.3mb but download stops at 33.1%
Kel Ma Kree Sha'shan Kel Me Ta'i Or'tani Kel Han'dai Iti Sha' Shan Handi |
seebakas
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:33:00 -
[115]
yeap it stops 68,1%
|
tEvEy
Genco
Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:35:00 -
[116]
now it works to download the patch, atleast for me
|
Caiman Graystock
The Caldari Confederation
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:35:00 -
[117]
patched fine, but not accepting connections, yay.
|
Claygon
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:37:00 -
[118]
Edited by: Claygon on 24/07/2007 12:37:29
downloaded it completley fine, but the server is still down
extended to 12:45
|
Magius Paulus
Gallente
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:42:00 -
[119]
Very strange. I was logged in for a sec, but it seemed my character was from 2 weeks earlier skill-wise. Curious...
|
Helison
Gallente
Times of Ancar
Pure.
|
Posted - 2007.07.24 12:47:00 -
[120]
Edited by: Helison on 24/07/2007 12:49:49
Originally by: Magius Paulus
Very strange. I was logged in for a sec, but it seemed my character was from 2 weeks earlier skill-wise. Curious...
I think you logged into a testserver and not to TQ.
PS: TQ is up and it¦s possible to login.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |