| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Samantha Utama
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 06:00:00 -
[91] - Quote
I wasn't there. I wanted to be there. I will be there next time.  |

Xa Fel
Tactical Knightmare
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 07:34:00 -
[92] - Quote
Viva la Darius III! Godspeed you griefing bastard! As a recently ex-member of Suddenly Ninjas, I can tell you interest in joining your operation has been piqued with your recent success. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
125
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 08:32:00 -
[93] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote: Just couple of days back when there were 3 high-sec Incs open; there were T1 fleets and they were pushing their way trough sites. Someone they'd be contested by shinies, sometimes not. Now when everyone is cramming into a single Inc to get as much as they can before someone closes it; they don't stand a remote chance.
That's quite "allright". The weak succumbs to the cunning / better / more prepared. Not a very educational or constructive philosophy but that's EvE.
So, when does it turn in "wrong"? Not when T1 fleets are beaten by restricted cartels. That's EvE. It's wrong when *either* T1 fleets or those cartels exploit the game mechanics to prevent it from complete. That has nothing to do with being in a Dominix (!) vs in a super-pimp 3B ship. It is about the exploit. Exploits are always bad in games, because they tilt a planned balance into something exaggerated else.
CeneUJiti wrote: How much of EVE is in high-sec? 80%? More? And how many of them are doing incursions? Couple thousand? I'm confident that infinite bounty and mission reward faucets of that vast mass of people outweigh Incursions.
Wrong. About 1000-1.500 are trading in Jita and probably about another 1000 are spread in the other major hubs. On a macro perspective they are performing market optimization in a negative sum game (ISK sink). Zero sum minus fees.
About 50 to 130 ice miners per system and other tens roid miners are probably going to form about 30% of the hi sec player base. They are producing zero ISK, only materials. Those without perfect refining skills are actually subject to ISK sink.
Some thousands missioneers. They both create ISK and destroy ISK (LP is an ISK sink). The ISK per pilot is capped by:
- them being alone. Some missions actively check for more pilots (triggers). This makes NPCs impact on that pilot with their EWAR and so on. - missions duration and ending are controlled. Blitz to get much LP or do full mission to get more bounties? The two are counter-balanced. Some will (or used to, I quit EvE for a while and it might have changed) farm the mission tomorrow and in some next days. 1 day "cooldown" is forced anyway. - most have to refit / refill / jump systems at each new mission. Some of this may be mitigated with multiple accounts but then the revenue per account lowers. - there is a good mission every some "crap" missions. Be it faction / drones / "duo of death" (warp and warp just for 2 ships) and similar, not all the missions grant full income.
Exploited incursions instead: - you do them in fleets, this allows to have better coverage against the NPC "tricks". - duration and ending are circumvented, no limit to how much ISK can be made. - multiple jumps required to get there but once at the place it's done. - only the best revenue sites are done, there's always and only top revenue.
CeneUJiti wrote: Null has upgraded systems, faction spawns, and there is always someone who knew a guy who heard about a guy who's friend killed an officer spawn.
(If you are lucky get to drop useful) officer drops are rare enough that they cost a lot. Incursions aren't. Officer drops are NOT an ISK faucet. You get an item, someone else pays the money. Money switches pockets, it's not created out of the blue and not reliably.
CeneUJiti wrote: just go to null and do Angel missions and provide more cheap Cynaballs an Drams for gentlemen whining about evil highsec carebears causing inflation and having too much isk.
BPCs are not an ISK faucet. Someone else provides the ISK.
CeneUJiti wrote: Nerfing highsec will not bring people into lowsec.
[/quote]
L4 missions have been nerfed, multiple times. That was a nerf. Removing an exploit instead is not an hi sec nerf. It's a fault fix.
|

Frooth
Unleet Industries LLC
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:04:00 -
[94] - Quote
Incursion still up !!!!!!!!!!! still making isk lots of isk still need moar isk
|

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
544
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:19:00 -
[95] - Quote
I hope all you hisecers who decided to help 00 overlords gain power over their members enjoy having your characters burned from running any decent fleets in the future.
It may not happen now but later when you go to run them you will notice you will spend alot of time in space with no invites. And that will never change because YOU decided to side with those who were only using you to further their own ends.
This was NOTHING about channel bans. This was about forcing members into CTAs. And you fell for it. |

Wrathful Hawk
Warsmiths Warsmiths.
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:34:00 -
[96] - Quote
CCP - The bears are making more money than the 0.0'ers. STOP THIS NAO.
Bears are milking 0.0 tears. ROFL.
Didn't think the day would ever come but now that it has i'm mildly amused. :D |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard
74
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:41:00 -
[97] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:I hope all you hisecers who decided to help 00 overlords gain power over their members enjoy having your characters burned from running any decent fleets in the future.
It may not happen now but later when you go to run them you will notice you will spend alot of time in space with no invites. And that will never change because YOU decided to side with those who were only using you to further their own ends.
This was NOTHING about channel bans. This was about forcing members into CTAs. And you fell for it.
Skunkworks is highsec, Lead Farmers are wormhole dudes... of the three that did this, only Brick is nullsec. And Darius didn't even want to ask Bricks if they'd like to come because he felt he'd lose cred asking nullsec pvpers to come do highsec grief. He was surprised by the amount of positive response he got.
In short, none of the '00 overlords' were behind this.
As for sitting in space with no invites, I can still get into fleet on this very character. But more importantly, we would be ec-*******-static if nobody had invites, because nobody cared, because those with the motivation were off trading calculated risk for better money.
In short, I don't think you really grasp the tenor of the whole situation.
Edit: Warsmiths, I keep bumping into your guys, both in game and on the forums. Is the universe conspiring to make us fight? |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:50:00 -
[98] - Quote
[quote=Vaerah Vahrokha exploit.... exploit... exploit...[/quote]
Nothing there is an exploit. CCP made incursions to last for maybe a week or two if no one wants to kill the Moms. That's the default. CCP made sites respawn constantly while Incursions is on. People just running VGs is the meta that EVE is famous for. Why waste time anywhere else when those give best isk/hr/effort?
As for L4s? There were never any exploits there as well. Agents in low were always paying much more than ones in highsec; and ones in null paying even more. Now in any L4 talk I will include LP at decent conversions so it is not all pure isk faucet. Pure isk income would be a much lower part of total income.
Only real exploit was getting highsec L5 and CCP fixed that. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
545
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:58:00 -
[99] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:I hope all you hisecers who decided to help 00 overlords gain power over their members enjoy having your characters burned from running any decent fleets in the future.
It may not happen now but later when you go to run them you will notice you will spend alot of time in space with no invites. And that will never change because YOU decided to side with those who were only using you to further their own ends.
This was NOTHING about channel bans. This was about forcing members into CTAs. And you fell for it. Skunkworks is highsec, Lead Farmers are wormhole dudes... of the three that did this, only Brick is nullsec. And Darius didn't even want to ask Bricks if they'd like to come because he felt he'd lose cred asking nullsec pvpers to come do highsec grief. He was surprised by the amount of positive response he got. In short, none of the '00 overlords' were behind this. As for sitting in space with no invites, I can still get into fleet on this very character. But more importantly, we would be ec-*******-static if nobody had invites, because nobody cared, because those with the motivation were off trading calculated risk for better money. In short, I don't think you really grasp the tenor of the whole situation. Edit: Warsmiths, I keep bumping into your guys, both in game and on the forums. Is the universe conspiring to make us fight?
Why should he potentially slow his CTAs by getting many nullsecers to actually lift a finger when he has fools in hisec doing his dirtywork? Fall for the "Gonna save teh hisec from Incursion runners" bit and end up burning your characters in the process to serve them. |

Wrathful Hawk
Warsmiths Warsmiths.
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 09:59:00 -
[100] - Quote
haha, isn't that what the eve universe is for? making people fight.
Glad you recognise the name, means we're getting to you :D |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
329
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:04:00 -
[101] - Quote
Akyla Dey wrote:The fact remains - CCP left the door open for this. There is no in-game mechanic preventing players from running the Mothership. They could have (and still can) easily implement a system whereby you had to run a certain amount of incursions to gain access to the Mom, a la mechanics in WoW for running bosses. They chose not to, and thus sanctioned the closing of Incursions if and when people decided to get a fleet together and do it. Just because it doesn't serve your purposes doesn't mean it's not a legitimate way to play the game.
Good post, but CCP DID put in a mechanic that prevents the mothership from being run early. Specifically, a certain number of sites need to be run. Given the nature of eve, its never gonna open for JUST certain people, it will open and they expect everyone to bum rush it because :kill!:
And the people who want to run the griefers off, all you have to do is use the same griefing tactics against them that they have been using against you!
You DID remember to learn from your experiences, right?  o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1550
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:05:00 -
[102] - Quote
If it wasn't for constant wardecs and negative sec status, I'd totally be headshotting motherships.
I love the incursion runners crying about being introduced to PvP, it's hilarious~ |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:13:00 -
[103] - Quote
Andski wrote:If it wasn't for constant wardecs and negative sec status, I'd totally be headshotting motherships.
I love the incursion runners crying about being introduced to PvP, it's hilarious~
WTF? Nobody is introduced to PVP. BRICK is doing a PVE activity iow killing moms prematurely and prevent anyone from making isk. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1550
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:13:00 -
[104] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:...and prevent anyone from making isk.
Income denial is PvP. |

LacLongQuan
Deep Space Expedition.
13
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:21:00 -
[105] - Quote
I want to slap in those bears' face so bad. 200m/h running sanctum. 500m/h running C5. kids, for once, get the **** out of hisec. |

wallenbergaren
University of Caille Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 10:23:00 -
[106] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:To finish. Out of couple hundred thousands highsec characters maybe 5-10k are doing incursions. And in absolutely best cases getting 140-160M/hr (that is with 0 tax). In a equally shiny ship as one needed for that number you'd do L4s for 90-120m/hr.
T1 ship with proper fits can reach and breach those numbers in 00 belts an upgraded anoms. Those are both pure isk faucets. DED plexes can bring insane profits but they don't pump money. But they area there, all from 6/10 and up, available to nullsec players.
Lowsec is junk and serves only to try and get fights and no other purpose. Nerfing highsec will not bring people into lowsec.
Not true. 90m/hr in anoms requires something like a Mach with fighter support, you can't do it in a T1 ship. If you want more than that you need to dualbox (which is much more demanding than dualboxing highsec Incursions mind you). In a T1 ship you'll be making way less. Furthermore anoms get much more heavily contested than Incursions do.
I used to rat in 0.0, but I would never go back to that unless anoms / Incursions get changed. I lived in a C6 with a static C5 and over time people in my corp basically stopped farming there because Incrusions were both easier and better ISK. |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 11:02:00 -
[107] - Quote
Better isk? Are you saying C5 and C6 give less than 140M/hr? I've run with shiniest fleets; with both fleet and wing boosters having T2 links and boosting implants; can't get shinier. Raw isk hovered around 120M/hr (with occasional series of 3 and 4 minute tics) when you count in all the pauses and interruptions. 5 minute bio breaks where 3 other people go on break during the break and you end up needing half an hour to reform fleet happen; and murder your total isk/hr.
Edit. If you count LP and use your brain about it you can get 200M+/hr... but too few people bother as conversions are not what they used to be. FCs and logis I know are sitting on insane pools of CONCORD LP and are not giving a damn about it. |

wallenbergaren
University of Caille Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 11:16:00 -
[108] - Quote
If you run sites with caps in your home system then the raw ISK / hr is better, but that's kind of an irrelevant figure because those sites: 1) spawn at an incredibly low rate compared to Incursions 2) only support about 6 people
If you want to farm sites in your static you need to first roll it until you get a good system which a) can take a while and b) people might not want you to, especially if you have a highsec route up. Then you need to scan all the sites before you can run them. Before you can do any of that you need to already have a fleet formed, which takes longer than in k-space because WHs do not support as many people as Incursions do (so there will never be as many around). When you're actually running sites in subcaps, Tengus for example, the ISK is slightly better than highsec Incursion, about the same as a low / null Incursion. Then you need to salvage the ****, and eventually haul it to highsec and then get it to sell.
It's a ton more work than Incursions, both to get started and once you're actually doing it. The rewards are not worth it (though there are of course other reasons to live in WHs than just ISK). |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 12:19:00 -
[109] - Quote
Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics". |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
329
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 12:28:00 -
[110] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics". Your not supposed to NEED that 'tiny' investment, that is the elitism of the people who control the Incursions currently causing that requirement.
You shouldn't 'NEED' anything more than some friends to run the sites.
edit: I'm dumb, and can't tell NPCs from player representatives to iceland. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 12:40:00 -
[111] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics". Your not supposed to NEED that 'tiny' investment, that is the elitism of the people who control the Incursions currently causing that requirement. You shouldn't 'NEED' anything more than some friends to run the sites. edit: I'm dumb, and can't tell NPCs from player representatives to iceland.
You can get a fleet with T1 BS. Did it first day when I started just to try the waters, before buddy got me into shiny fleet. Even if people are not contesting your sites you are still about as much as you'd get in L4 in T1 bs. |

Oxandrolone
Bite me inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 12:40:00 -
[112] - Quote
Moar people doing cap escaltions in C5's please, its almost impossible to find cap ships to kill these days -_- |

Hoxothul
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 13:03:00 -
[113] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics".
As somebody pointed out, it's not required to have pimp fitted ships to do any of that.
We went and did the MOM with 39 people in T1 battleships, granted we did lose a few ships, it was mostly due to the fact that none of us knew what the heck this was about. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
329
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 13:03:00 -
[114] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics". Your not supposed to NEED that 'tiny' investment, that is the elitism of the people who control the Incursions currently causing that requirement. You shouldn't 'NEED' anything more than some friends to run the sites. edit: I'm dumb, and can't tell NPCs from player representatives to iceland. You can get a fleet with T1 BS. Did it first day when I started just to try the waters, before buddy got me into shiny fleet. Even if people are not contesting your sites you are still about as much as you'd get in L4 in T1 bs. So, does it require that investment, or does it not? In this pyramid of quotes, I have you on record saying both.
Pick one. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 13:14:00 -
[115] - Quote
In order to have a large edge over L4s and get you the money people are complaining about... yes you need to be shiny. I'd suspect you'd be raging even more if people could get 120-140m/hr in Drakes and Ravens.
If you just want to do Incursions for completely unspectacular incomes; then you don't need investment. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
329
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 13:18:00 -
[116] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:In order to have a large edge over L4s and get you the money people are complaining about... yes you need to be shiny. I'd suspect you'd be raging even more if people could get 120-140m/hr in Drakes and Ravens.
If you just want to do Incursions for completely unspectacular incomes; then you don't need investment. Ah, well, if thats the case, its completely true of every form of income. Sadly, at a given level of investment, incursions pay out more than any other form of income(other than maybe tech moons, which are not a personal form of income) o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1112
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 16:01:00 -
[117] - Quote
Andski wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:...and prevent anyone from making isk. Income denial is PvP.
That there is a goon who understands the economic side of warfare. Something that my government fails at when they use a million dollar missile to destroy a 40 dollar tent.
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1112
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 16:09:00 -
[118] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:Tallian Saotome wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:Aren't you all kinda forgetting the "tiny" initial investment of 2 or 3 bill to start doing Incursions? And need to know FCs and logis who will not kill you out of malice or incompetence? Its not just "oh I'll go farm Incursions"... "starts getting 3min tics". Your not supposed to NEED that 'tiny' investment, that is the elitism of the people who control the Incursions currently causing that requirement. You shouldn't 'NEED' anything more than some friends to run the sites. edit: I'm dumb, and can't tell NPCs from player representatives to iceland. You can get a fleet with T1 BS. Did it first day when I started just to try the waters, before buddy got me into shiny fleet. Even if people are not contesting your sites you are still about as much as you'd get in L4 in T1 bs. So, does it require that investment, or does it not? In this pyramid of quotes, I have you on record saying both. Pick one.
If you do it in T1s, you will need some RR on the T1s to back up the logis. There's the biggest difference I have observed. A T2/Faction will have better resists or if pimped, simple be more resistant to the incoming damage.
So with a T1 fleet, the logis are stretched, and some of the orbiting BS will have to cut DPS for RR because it seems like there is a cyclic "kill the logi" directive in the AI. With cut DPS, the enemy is not take out fast enough, and there will be these little surges of damage on the logi that, if not prepared for, will take the logi down rapidly. To keep that from happening you have to cut DPS for RR, meaning it will take longer, and more chances the logi goes down - a self influencing matter.
But it's still possible with T1s and some logis. You need shineys if you are going to do "bait ball RR" methods, kill primary, and chat on Facebook at the same time. T1s only require that the FC and captains be more on their guard, keep an eye on the logi, and pay good attention to the "aggro fu" and especially and "small fast threats". It's just more work, which of course is something that people take pride in not having to do around here.
|

CeneUJiti
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 16:28:00 -
[119] - Quote
Tallian Saotome wrote:CeneUJiti wrote:In order to have a large edge over L4s and get you the money people are complaining about... yes you need to be shiny. I'd suspect you'd be raging even more if people could get 120-140m/hr in Drakes and Ravens.
If you just want to do Incursions for completely unspectacular incomes; then you don't need investment. Ah, well, if thats the case, its completely true of every form of income. Sadly, at a given level of investment, incursions pay out more than any other form of income(other than maybe tech moons, which are not a personal form of income)
Well extra income should be there to promote cooperative and group activity over just soling (or dualboxing) L4s or whatever. |

XXSketchxx
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
93
|
Posted - 2012.01.16 16:29:00 -
[120] - Quote
CeneUJiti wrote:
Lowsec is junk and serves only to try and get fights and no other purpose. Nerfing highsec will not bring people into lowsec.
The assumption that people want incursions or other bear farming activities nerfed for the purpose of bringing those people to low sec is pathetic.
We just want tears and a balanced game. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |