| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
359
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:05:00 -
[151] - Quote
Raptor (yes, it's still in the database) Moa (see above) Egale (everything) Ferox (lol) Raven (30% less ehp than most armour bs's) Rokh (lack of dps) Pheonix (because citadel torps are awesome)
Instead, the highest priority is a drake nerf...
This will end well. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Xpaulusx
Hosti1e Traff1c Control
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:12:00 -
[152] - Quote
Pattern Clarc wrote:
Raptor (yes, it's still in the database) Moa (see above) Egale (everything) Ferox (lol) Raven (30% less ehp than most armour bs's) Rokh (lack of dps) Pheonix (because citadel torps are awesome)
Instead, the highest priority is a drake nerf...
This will end well.
Yep, point i was trying to make all along not mention people bitching about Falcons, (ECM Nerf on the horizon) thank god im Calmatar. God gave them ears but they do not listen, brain dosen't seem to work either  |

Klown Walk
Ore Mongers BricK sQuAD.
39
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:15:00 -
[153] - Quote
I really hope they don-¦t nerf cyclones. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:21:00 -
[154] - Quote
What the hell is an egale
:p |

Gempei
Siberian Khatru. Shadow Operations.
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:22:00 -
[155] - Quote
Mutnin wrote:Why is the Drake so popular? Because it's the only damn useful PVP ship Caldari has out side ECM and smart bombing Rokhs. Fix the other Caldari ships if you want to see less Drakes. +1
|

Kingwood
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:24:00 -
[156] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:can i point out that reducing the tank and increasing the gank on a drake isnt exactly a nerf
that ship had plenty of tank, it can spare a little bit
also, STFU about nulsec alliances and your batshit insane conspiracy theories #1 this isn't going to be a "little bit" nerf. Removing the resist bonus will gut its ability to tank anything other than Kinetic. That will destroy its Lvl4 ability right there. #2 CCP went to the CSM FIRST instead of the community about this load of crap. They need the green light from a bunch of nullsec players before they can even talk to us about it? This should have been posted the moment it arrived as in idea at the office so we could have said it was a terrible idea then instead of now.
Noone cares about your missions.
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:25:00 -
[157] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:The CSM does not exist to be a good ole boy club to greenlight BS that CCP does. They completely and utterly failed to stop CCP's head dive into incarna and greenlighted this POS despite many in the community that oppose it.
Now we have to do this months later when this could have been put on the shelf months ago and focus put on the CSM talking about stuff that needs to be NDA for now. Drake nerfs are nothing to NDA unless of course you want to try to rush them in before the community can react.
You know, i think you are about 2 months too late on this whole 'hate on CSM' deal. The current CSM have handled the previously self destructive urges of CCP quite well i think, and we are currently headed towards the most brightest future EVE has known for quite some time.
Also, tell me why you are so mad about them exchanging some of the Drakes tank for gank.
There is literally nothing to complain about here, so stop trying. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
567
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:27:00 -
[158] - Quote
Kingwood wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Skippermonkey wrote:can i point out that reducing the tank and increasing the gank on a drake isnt exactly a nerf
that ship had plenty of tank, it can spare a little bit
also, STFU about nulsec alliances and your batshit insane conspiracy theories #1 this isn't going to be a "little bit" nerf. Removing the resist bonus will gut its ability to tank anything other than Kinetic. That will destroy its Lvl4 ability right there. #2 CCP went to the CSM FIRST instead of the community about this load of crap. They need the green light from a bunch of nullsec players before they can even talk to us about it? This should have been posted the moment it arrived as in idea at the office so we could have said it was a terrible idea then instead of now. Noone cares about your missions.
Oh nullsec alliances care. Lvl4 missions and incursions means newer players have a choice in EVE that isn't being fodder for moon goo. It means their own players can log in alts to avoid BS CTAS.
The Drake was a thorn in their moon goo encrusted side now once this crap goes through they can be removed from the field both on and off. And go back to the KM generating alpha spree.
|

Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic Tragedy.
931
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:27:00 -
[159] - Quote
lol...this entire thread is so full of fail. Let's nerf one ship so another ship can take it's place as the OP "in need of nerf" ship. The Drake by itself has gone through what...3 nerfs not including this one now? What is it going to take here to appease people? Make it a starter ship? God...I don't even fly a Drake anymore...I fly my Oracle...I suppose that needs a nerf too though. A nano fit Oracle is pretty rediculous... EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
568
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:30:00 -
[160] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:The CSM does not exist to be a good ole boy club to greenlight BS that CCP does. They completely and utterly failed to stop CCP's head dive into incarna and greenlighted this POS despite many in the community that oppose it.
Now we have to do this months later when this could have been put on the shelf months ago and focus put on the CSM talking about stuff that needs to be NDA for now. Drake nerfs are nothing to NDA unless of course you want to try to rush them in before the community can react. You know, i think you are about 2 months too late on this whole 'hate on CSM' deal. The current CSM have handled the previously self destructive urges of CCP quite well i think, and we are currently headed towards the most brightest future EVE has known for quite some time. Also, tell me why you are so mad about them exchanging some of the Drakes tank for gank. There is literally nothing to complain about here, so stop trying.
The CSM does NOT deserve credit for stopping CCP. It was the community doing mass unsubs and protests that did it. CSM went there to say the same thing the forum was saying.
The CSM should be there to present ideas and thought. Not be a traffic light for CCP ideas that could benefit their moon goo and power them through CTAs.
CCP should present their ideas to US the players first. THEN the CSM should remind CCP on what CCP can clearly read on the forums if needed. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:33:00 -
[161] - Quote
i hate to be so droll, but post with your nulsec main and then we'll see if you qualify as an authority on the matter
also, stop the bullcrap about missions and incursions. Only a fool would take a Drake into either. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
137
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:33:00 -
[162] - Quote
Qarth wrote: Let the Winmatar and Amar languish for a few years as you start working on fixing the "other two" races ships.
Sorry to burst your bubble but Minmatar were laughed at and not even allowed in certain fleets for years. It was all "Amarr (anything) / Mega (and little else of Gallente) or GTFO".
|

Pattern Clarc
Aperture Harmonics
361
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:37:00 -
[163] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:
You know, i think you are about 2 months too late on this whole 'hate on CSM' deal. The current CSM have handled the previously self destructive urges of CCP quite well i think, and we are currently headed towards the most brightest future EVE has known for quite some time.
Also, tell me why you are so mad about them exchanging some of the Drakes tank for gank.
There is literally nothing to complain about here, so stop trying.
Not much beyond the whole, completely ********, lets make the rest of EVE like 0.0 because 0.0 sucks.
Destructible NPC stations - because PL is soooo evil and bad and is hurting our ability to napfest Destructible 0.0 stations in general... Incursion nerfs, because 0.0 sucks "Oh noes, what about the low sec pirates" as a reason for why FW can't be good or why the RISK in low sec can't be moderated Wormhole stabilisers, because thats one thing w-space needs, more blobbing and 0.0 style blobs because one member on the CSM hasn't figured out how to evict people from wormholes. And the whole general lobsided view on 0.0 - vested interests who were MORE OUT OF TOUCH THAN THE CCP WERE on a number of issues.
It was a pretty big fail if you actually read the minutes. Ex CSM member & Designer of the Tornado. Gallente - Pilot satisfaction |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:38:00 -
[164] - Quote
i did read the minutes, and it was all great stuff
edit - well maybe not the wormhole stabiliser idea |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
568
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:41:00 -
[165] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:i hate to be so droll, but post with your nulsec main and then we'll see if you qualify as an authority on the matter
also, stop the bullcrap about missions and incursions. Only a fool would take a Drake into either.
No thanks.
As for you 2nd point I read it as "YAHHH F THE NEW GUYS! Join my alliance"
Besides CCP can spend two seconds and know who I am and know I have plenty of experience dealing with bullcrap nullsec politics. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:45:00 -
[166] - Quote
Endeavor, let me teach you something about hisec PVE progression.
lvl1 missions you use a frigate lvl2 missions you use a cruiser lvl3 missions you use a battlecruiser lvl4 missions you use a battleship lvl5 missions you just dont
as for incursions, get in a logi ship or get in a dps battleship
this is as basic as it goes, you can no longer worry about the 'new guy' because as far as non-incursion pve goes. They are more than likely going to train for a tengu anyway.
tl:dr all your grievances and annoyances have no grounding in reality |

Fidelium Mortis
Quantum Cats Syndicate
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:46:00 -
[167] - Quote
Super Chair wrote:Rather than nerfing ECM...why not buff sensor damps like they intend to? A celestis/arazu/lach damping a falcon/rook is already very effective against birds at range....
This. Also need to take a look at the light ECM drones. They are currently a bit too effective for the relative cost (price and risk/reward). ICRS - Intergalactic Certified Rocket Surgeon |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
568
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:47:00 -
[168] - Quote
Train for a Tengu? Are you playing EVE online? How on earth are they supposed to afford A Tengu.
Ohhh I see now. Maybe they will earn enough in nullsec to get one between defending moon goo on multiple CTAs in the same day.
+1 Huge alliances. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:49:00 -
[169] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Train for a Tengu? Are you playing EVE online? How on earth are they supposed to afford A Tengu.
Ohhh I see now. Maybe they will earn enough in nullsec to get one between defending moon goo on multiple CTAs in the same day.
+1 Huge alliances.
Ive never joined a nulsec alliance, and can afford a tengu
also, if by some hillarious truth, this is actually your main and you fly in an NPC corp, try joining a corp. Its much more fun to fly with other pilots, and you get more done. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
355
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:54:00 -
[170] - Quote
jolas apt wrote:Mr Kidd wrote:Nerf the Drake and the Tengu becomes more popular for PVP.
What you said exactly was, nerfing a 30mil hull will make a half billion one more popular for PVP. Do I need to explain where you argument fails?
Please do.
For some function does not depend upon costs. While each hull fills its role well at its price point, it would not deter some from depending solely on the tengu where in the past they have depended upon the drake. Cost being of little concern is not so much an indication of one's wealth as much as one's practicalities. There are advantages to the relatively smaller hull, decent DPS and huge tanks the drake is capable of when compared to other ships. When it ceases to be such the natural tendency is to move into the next best hull to fit that particular role which is not necessarily a linear move based on cost but rather capability. The reason the tengu is not more popular is because the drake's capabilities overlapping the tengu's, so well, at a price that is hard to ignore.
For example, you're more likely to see proteus' in fleet ops than myrms because, lets face it, the myrm doesn't begin to approach the proteus in all but the most gimped of proteus fits. At least in my neck of the woods. I am in w-space where large fleet fights with alliances throwing their members as fodder for a meat grinder doesn't really happen. So, perspective might have much to do with my analysis. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
569
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 14:58:00 -
[171] - Quote
You do realize that then the same exact excuse that they will use to nerf the drake can and will be used to nerf the Tengu right? |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
355
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:01:00 -
[172] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:You do realize that then the same exact excuse that they will use to nerf the drake can and will be used to nerf the Tengu right?
I've already stated that Caldari should be rebalanced as a whole rather than a single ship. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
569
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:03:00 -
[173] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:You do realize that then the same exact excuse that they will use to nerf the drake can and will be used to nerf the Tengu right? I've already stated that Caldari should be rebalanced as a whole rather than a single ship.
Wow so not only should we nuke the Drake from orbit. Lets drag up all the nukes ever made and nuke an entire in game race.
BRILLIANT! |

Kingwood
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:04:00 -
[174] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Mr Kidd wrote:Endeavour Starfleet wrote:You do realize that then the same exact excuse that they will use to nerf the drake can and will be used to nerf the Tengu right? I've already stated that Caldari should be rebalanced as a whole rather than a single ship. Wow so not only should we nuke the Drake from orbit. Lets drag up all the nukes ever made and nuke an entire in game race. BRILLIANT!
Hi, they're changing a spaceship in a videogame, not torturing your family or girlfriend. You should calm down a little.
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
317
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:06:00 -
[175] - Quote
once more, repeat after me
CHANGING SHIP BONUSES IS NOT A NERF OR A BUFF
CCP_DarthVader wrote:I am altering the Drake, pray i don't alter it any further |

Rel'k Bloodlor
Mecha Enterprises Fleet
82
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:10:00 -
[176] - Quote
dose any one even relise that the drake was and is the problem it breakes the mold, its the deffence of the Caldari gun boats with the mids of our sheild boats. I can't wait for my drakes to get this well needed damage boost! ROF on a BC till now thats been a BS and up thing. Hi-sec mission runners you can do the exact damage you need at ranges to far for the NPC's to fight back from and 25%ROF is more that 25%dammage to one type. Low sec PvPers HAM's any one? I like the idea of going toe to toe with canes  null sec get back in your tempest, why were you even in drakes before? Oh ya every one can fly them.
|

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
569
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:11:00 -
[177] - Quote
It is a huge nerf for a great many that actually use them. The newer players as their first real ship. For the same players that decide THAT is the ship they are going to fly well.
I and many others see that as a nerf. A bit more HAM or HM range is meaningless when your drake melts. |

Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
569
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:13:00 -
[178] - Quote
Rel'k Bloodlor wrote:dose any one even relise that the drake was and is the problem it breakes the mold, its the deffence of the Caldari gun boats with the mids of our sheild boats. I can't wait for my drakes to get this well needed damage boost! ROF on a BC till now thats been a BS and up thing. Hi-sec mission runners you can do the exact damage you need at ranges to far for the NPC's to fight back from and 25%ROF is more that 25%dammage to one type. Low sec PvPers HAM's any one? I like the idea of going toe to toe with canes  null sec get back in your tempest, why were you even in drakes before? Oh ya every one can fly them.
You don't run missions do you.
By the time your burn out of range you will be destroyed. |

Rel'k Bloodlor
Mecha Enterprises Fleet
82
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:16:00 -
[179] - Quote
No your right i don't do hi sec lvl 4's, but to be fare that's a team or BS job any way and you know it. |

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
91
|
Posted - 2012.01.18 15:17:00 -
[180] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Please keep in mind these notes date back from December, and as such some points may have evolved as we are gathering more data with time etc etc.
HAVE MY BABIES
Quote:The newer players as their first real ship.
I think the idea that BCs is their first "real ship" is the attitude CCP is trying to combat. Hence,
Quote:Incorrectly funnel new players: don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP. What's the point of a Bellicose? Exequror? Maller? Moa? They shouldn't be things you just skip on the way to a greater purpose, like a leaf of salad in my 250gr double-layered onion and egg hamburger.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |