Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Wot I Think
State War Academy Caldari State
217
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. |

Valei Khurelem
191
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
They don't really seem like the type to have true friends so I don't really see the point of this argument, to be serious though, you already pointed at the real issue in your rant anyway, the roaming gangs and the pointlessness of being in 0.0 space are the reasons why 0.0 is so useless and largely empty.
Why stay in a place you can get ganked constantly when you earn far less than people in high sec who don't get ganked? It doesn't make any sense if CCP is really going for risk vs reward in EVE.
"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP." -á - CCP Ytterbium |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends.
Good post. |

Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
256
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yay! Another Incursion whine thread.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Yay! Another Incursion whine thread.
Yeah but at least his was well thought out and not a "OMG NERF INCURSIONS QUIT EVE BBQ HELICOPTER!" |

Geoscape
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
The consequences of incursion carebearing are getting more and more magical. |

SilentSkills
Event.Horizon Flatline.
86
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote: Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
I love posters that change numbers to bolster their point. It used to be 60, then 80, then 100, now its 130mil/hr? Damn those bears are surely resourceful, and they do not compete for it among themselves, clearly.
Incursions are not a constant 130m isk/hr per pilot isk faucet. Don't pull numbers out of your ass without wiping the bullshit off it first. 130m/hr is not possible to do unless you are in a very specific fleet, with a specific setup, with no competition (which happens all the time), because its not just you and your fleet running, its you and another 100 people as well competing for them.
A more realistic number is 100 in a lucky l33t fleet, 60 ish in an average SP/ship fleet, and much less in a newbie fleet). Your number fails to account, people who leave, people who sleep, eat, **** and ****.
So sir, incursions are indeed a proliferating isk faucet, but not a constant one. |

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
119
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends.
You are a liar. Pure and simple. Your numbers are a complete fabrication. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
86
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. You are a liar. Pure and simple. Your numbers are a complete fabrication.
His numbers are sort of on point, 100mil an hour doesn't need a "shiney" fleet just one that is built correctly.
That would be 2.3bil per pilot on a 23 hour cycle.
Since you don't start seeing systems contest till about 100 in system that is a trillion an hour per vanguard system with 100 pilots running, maybe a little less, but no less that 750 bil.
Thus you are talking in the range of 19-23 trillion per day per hi-sec vanguard system.
|

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
79
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Doesn't matter anyway as the OP fails to grasp that incurions don't account for the main contribution of isk faucets in the game. You only have to consider all the mission runners in the game to see where one big generator is.
The recent plex spike "coincided" (see this word its important, look it up in a dictionary if you need to) after the promotion of the power of two, or increased number of accounts and also the advent of Crucible for which everyone seems to have returned to play or has encouraged exisitng and newer players to Plex further.
And since it was a spike, and not the gradual increase due to what may have been seen for the length of time for which incursions have operated then only helps to show the continually poor associations people make. Usually for their own selfish interests, and has been classically announced and substantiated here that its the null players who want to control what people do. |
|

B DeLeon
DeLeon Industries
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 15:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
That's where the problem is. In 0.0 with a t1 bs you can get ~30-40mill/hour by ratting running anomalies. With a pimp ship you can get 40-100 mill/hour. Similar reward but so much higher risk. There are the sov bills, upgrade costs, fuel costs (to resupply assets) and you have to deal with roaming gangs/afk cloakers etc and you must participate in huge fights all the time to defend the territory wich is fun and the main reason why people lives in null but they spend the money what they earn one way or another. In the meantime norisk highsec incursion runners grinding out insane amount of money srewing up the plex prices forcing all the EvE players who aren't participating in incursion grindfleets to grind more for their gametime.
Incursion is a great feature for high sec players for social interaction. It's not the incursion what is broken but the reward system. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
79
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
B DeLeon wrote:SilentSkills wrote:Wot I Think wrote: Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops. I love posters that change numbers to bolster their point. It used to be 60, then 80, then 100, now its 130mil/hr? Damn those bears are surely resourceful, and they do not compete for it among themselves, clearly. Incursions are not a constant 130m isk/hr per pilot isk faucet. Don't pull numbers out of your ass without wiping the bullshit off it first. 130m/hr is not possible to do unless you are in a very specific fleet, with a specific setup, with no competition (which happens all the time), because its not just you and your fleet running, its you and another 100 people as well competing for them. A more realistic number is 100 in a lucky l33t fleet, 60 ish in an average SP/ship fleet, and much less in a newbie fleet). Your number fails to account, people who leave, people who sleep, eat, **** and ****. So sir, incursions are indeed a proliferating isk faucet, but not a constant one. That's where the problem is. In 0.0 with a t1 bs you can get ~30-40mill/hour by ratting or running anomalies. With a pimp ship you can get 40-100 mill/hour. Similar reward but so much higher risk. There are the sov bills, upgrade costs, fuel costs (to resupply assets) and you have to deal with roaming gangs/afk cloakers etc and you must participate in huge fights all the time to defend the territory wich is fun and the main reason why people lives in null but they spend the money what they earn one way or another. In the meantime norisk highsec incursion runners are grinding out insane amount of money srcewing up the plex prices forcing all the EvE players who aren't participating in incursion grindfleets to grind more for their gametime. Incursion is a great feature for high sec players for social interaction and noone denies that. It's not the incursion what is broken but the reward system.
Which presumably is why the rewards for null sec incursions are higher aslong as all the other earning possibilities, so whats your point again? |

B DeLeon
DeLeon Industries
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
Null and lowsec incursions are a nice quick ISK injection for the neighbourhood but that's all. You can't run with huge pimp fleets from incursion to incursion in null and low because soon or later you will be faceraped by the nearby entities. |

Selinate
599
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:20:00 -
[14] - Quote
Quote:
His numbers are sort of on point, 100mil an hour doesn't need a "shiney" fleet just one that is built correctly.
That would be 2.3bil per pilot on a 23 hour cycle.
Since you don't start seeing systems contest till about 100 in system that is a trillion an hour per vanguard system with 100 pilots running, maybe a little less, but no less that 750 bil.
Thus you are talking in the range of 19-23 trillion per day per hi-sec vanguard system.
50 in local, sites can start being contested.
100 mil an hour requires a *fairly* shiny fleet to run the sites.
Also, anyone playing 23 hours a day is a bot. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
B DeLeon wrote:Null and lowsec incursions are a nice quick ISK injection for the neighbourhood but that's all. You can't run with huge pimp fleets from incursion to incursion in null and low because soon or later you will be faceraped by the nearby entities.
But if CCP changes the null/low incursions reward in parallel with the highsec incursions then I don't have problem with it.
Well other null bears report that can operate quite well in their own protected SoV space. When you add all the other lucrative earning possibilities in null into the mix it wouldn't suprise me if you are not more of a plexer than others.
And as far as I understood the differences between areas have been already balanced to afford your request.
Despite that Incursions don't account for the bulk of the faucets, consider the bounties in missions and elsewhere aswell as all other isk generating features. Then you might find the main culprits for plex purchasing.
Plex are sold in the 100k + units per month, and that is quoting figures from last quarter of QEN 2010 so will have likley incresed significantly if the spikes due to crucible and power of 2 are anything to go by. I seriosuly doubt there is that many incursion runners in high sec to accomodate for all of those purchases. |

Skydell
Space Mermaids
113
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
I said this a year ago. Back when everyone was spazzing about Monocles, I watch our Null home system go from having 80-90 all the time to having 2
Anom Nerf killed this game. It turned Null sec in to moon goo sec. No moon goo? Nobody wants it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4492
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
Selinate wrote:50 in local, sites can start being contested.
100 mil an hour requires a *fairly* shiny fleet to run the sites.
Also, anyone playing 23 hours a day is a bot. It's not about the single player GÇö it's about how the totality of incursion runners add ISK to the economy. When one player leaves, another takes his spot and keeps up the ISK injection, and on it goes 23.5/7. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1627
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Well other null bears report that can operate quite well in their own protected SoV space. When you add all the other lucrative earning possibilities in null into the mix it wouldn't suprise me if you are not more of a plexer than others.
Sov space incursions are usually a "run sites until the mothership spawns and kill it ASAP" affair. Not being able to light cynos in an entire constellation screws up logistics. |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
518
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:44:00 -
[19] - Quote
Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1627
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:47:00 -
[20] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE.
incursions and tech are basically competing entities
leave incursions unchecked and tech will go up up up because of inflation |
|

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:50:00 -
[21] - Quote
Andski wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE. incursions and tech are basically competing entities leave incursions unchecked and tech will go up up up because of inflation
Then we better start worrying about the main isk faucets then, bounties overall rather than incursions which arent the main contributor by a long shot. And suprise suprise, best bounties are in null sec. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1627
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Andski wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE. incursions and tech are basically competing entities leave incursions unchecked and tech will go up up up because of inflation Then we better start worrying about the main isk faucets then, bounties overall rather than incursions which arent the main contributor by a long shot. And suprise suprise, best bounties are in null sec.
source? |

Jenny Cameron
Ordo Eventus Inception Alliance
33
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 16:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops. I thought EVE was about having fun, not making ISK? |

Skydell
Space Mermaids
113
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 17:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jenny Cameron wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops. I thought EVE was about having fun, not making ISK?
Feel free to have fun being broke in New Eden. I get what you are saying but they go hand in hand. ISK grind down time is the only thing they have to claim "hard".
|

Crystal Liche
ACME Mineral and Gas
132
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 17:02:00 -
[25] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends.
lol, you people are amazing with your bs theories.
Did it ever occure to you that some people like PvP and some people like PvE?
Its a GAME, people do what the like, that is all. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
361
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 17:08:00 -
[26] - Quote
op played anarchy online |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 19:33:00 -
[27] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Andski wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE. incursions and tech are basically competing entities leave incursions unchecked and tech will go up up up because of inflation Then we better start worrying about the main isk faucets then, bounties overall rather than incursions which arent the main contributor by a long shot. And suprise suprise, best bounties are in null sec. source?
What is the problem with Nullsec Alliance members that they deny everything, even if it is commonly known to be true. Bounties scale with security level, so don't be a jackass. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1308
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 19:35:00 -
[28] - Quote
blaming "feature" not the one who made an decision to do what they did.
It will get you far. |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. You are a liar. Pure and simple. Your numbers are a complete fabrication. His numbers are sort of on point, 100mil an hour doesn't need a "shiney" fleet just one that is built correctly. That would be 2.3bil per pilot on a 23 hour cycle. Since you don't start seeing systems contest till about 100 in system that is a trillion an hour per vanguard system with 100 pilots running, maybe a little less, but no less that 750 bil. Thus you are talking in the range of 19-23 trillion per day per hi-sec vanguard system.
This is the one I have to wonder about. Are those Typo's? Obviously not, as the authors quite consistent; but then I have to wonder if he's completely off his rocker? Maybe misunderstood the question, or has no idea what he's talking about?
I've never run Incursions, but I have a very hard time believing this. I believe it's possible that 8 out of 100 pilots make 60-70 million ISK an hour each, and maybe as many as 3 times that running different sites in the same system. So that would actually be 24 pilots times ~70 million ISK, and equal about 1.68 billion ISK an hour for each Vanguard system.
Certainly not 100 pilots times 130 million ISK an hour, for 13 brillion ISK. Nowhere near a trillion ISK an hour; someone needs to stop drinking and posting.
Sure as heck a bunch of fleets, with 100 pilots total for all fleets, don't get a payout each. Even if you had 3 Vanguard sites in one system, and one fleet of 33 pilots per site farming; you'd find this wouldn't amount to much, because each pilot would be earning something like ~16 million each per hour.
Reward scales with number of pilots as far as I know; just like they do in Wormholes with Sleepers. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
235
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
not really drama so much as some guys hiding behind npc forum alts with deeply laden nullsec-inferiority complex issues |
|

Deviana Sevidon
Jades Falcon Guards
261
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
One pro tip to the nullbears: Don't compare incursion income to the 23/7 cylce you let your bots run. No incursion pilot is online for that much time and because people don't bot they need a break from time to time, you will also have to factor sleep and a wide number of RL activities into this.
|

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:20:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Onictus wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. You are a liar. Pure and simple. Your numbers are a complete fabrication. His numbers are sort of on point, 100mil an hour doesn't need a "shiney" fleet just one that is built correctly. That would be 2.3bil per pilot on a 23 hour cycle. Since you don't start seeing systems contest till about 100 in system that is a trillion an hour per vanguard system with 100 pilots running, maybe a little less, but no less that 750 bil. Thus you are talking in the range of 19-23 trillion per day per hi-sec vanguard system. This is the one I have to wonder about. Are those Typo's? Obviously not, as the authors quite consistent; but then I have to wonder if he's completely off his rocker? Maybe misunderstood the question, or has no idea what he's talking about? I've never run Incursions, but I have a very hard time believing this. I believe it's possible that 8 out of 100 pilots make 60-70 million ISK an hour each, and maybe as many as 3 times that running different sites in the same system. So that would actually be 24 pilots times ~70 million ISK, and equal about 1.68 billion ISK an hour for each Vanguard system. Certainly not 100 pilots times 130 million ISK an hour, for 13 brillion ISK. Nowhere near a trillion ISK an hour; someone needs to stop drinking and posting. Sure as heck a bunch of fleets, with 100 pilots total for all fleets, don't get a payout each. Even if you had 3 Vanguard sites in one system, and one fleet of 33 pilots per site farming; you'd find this wouldn't amount to much, because each pilot would be earning something like ~16 million each per hour. Reward scales with number of pilots as far as I know; just like they do in Wormholes with Sleepers.
SO wait you are tell me you have never tried it but i'm wrong.
It wasn't a typo douche bag, I said 100 mil per hour per pilot....I wasn't wrong and I wasn't bullshitting...that is an average fleet.
Good fleets pull 120 uncontested and shinies 150 mil PER HOUR.
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
235
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:21:00 -
[33] - Quote
Quote:One pro tip to the nullbears: Don't compare incursion income to the 23/7 cylce you let your bots run. No incursion pilot is online for that much time and because people don't bot they need a break from time to time, you will also have to factor sleep and a wide number of RL activities into this. case in point |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
77
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Mars Theran wrote:Onictus wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. You are a liar. Pure and simple. Your numbers are a complete fabrication. His numbers are sort of on point, 100mil an hour doesn't need a "shiney" fleet just one that is built correctly. That would be 2.3bil per pilot on a 23 hour cycle. Since you don't start seeing systems contest till about 100 in system that is a trillion an hour per vanguard system with 100 pilots running, maybe a little less, but no less that 750 bil. Thus you are talking in the range of 19-23 trillion per day per hi-sec vanguard system. This is the one I have to wonder about. Are those Typo's? Obviously not, as the authors quite consistent; but then I have to wonder if he's completely off his rocker? Maybe misunderstood the question, or has no idea what he's talking about? I've never run Incursions, but I have a very hard time believing this. I believe it's possible that 8 out of 100 pilots make 60-70 million ISK an hour each, and maybe as many as 3 times that running different sites in the same system. So that would actually be 24 pilots times ~70 million ISK, and equal about 1.68 billion ISK an hour for each Vanguard system. Certainly not 100 pilots times 130 million ISK an hour, for 13 brillion ISK. Nowhere near a trillion ISK an hour; someone needs to stop drinking and posting. Sure as heck a bunch of fleets, with 100 pilots total for all fleets, don't get a payout each. Even if you had 3 Vanguard sites in one system, and one fleet of 33 pilots per site farming; you'd find this wouldn't amount to much, because each pilot would be earning something like ~16 million each per hour. Reward scales with number of pilots as far as I know; just like they do in Wormholes with Sleepers. SO wait you are telling me you have never tried it but i'm wrong. It wasn't a typo douche bag, I said 100 mil per hour per pilot....I wasn't wrong and I wasn't bullshitting...that is an average fleet. Good fleets pull 120 uncontested and shinies 150 mil PER HOUR.
You also said 1 Trillion per hour per system. 100 pilots in 1 system running 130 million per hour per pilot is only 13 billion ISK.
If it was 23 Trillion ISK per day per Vaguard System, the economy would be completely fubar. |

Dbars Grinding
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
335
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
next week incursions will make 175mil an hour!!!! quick everyone make posts! |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:42:00 -
[36] - Quote
grr |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 20:43:00 -
[37] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Mars Theran wrote:[
You also said 1 Trillion per hour per system. 100 pilots in 1 system running 130 million per hour per pilot is only 13 billion ISK.
If it was 23 Trillion ISK per day per Vaguard System, the economy would be completely fubar.
Sorry 100 billion per hour
So 23 billion a day per system, sometimes three incursions, so 6 systems at a time.....1.38 trillion per day with three hi-sec incursions running.
Which is why plex when from around 290-325 when I started playing to 425-500 now depending on where the spike is. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
327
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:16:00 -
[38] - Quote
Deviana Sevidon wrote:One pro tip to the nullbears: Don't compare incursion income to the 23/7 cylce you let your bots run. No incursion pilot is online for that much time and because people don't bot they need a break from time to time, you will also have to factor sleep and a wide number of RL activities into this.
While a select number of 0.0 people are assholes and shamelessly run bots, please do not use them to besmirch the name of everyone in 0.0. The point OP was trying to make is that for leisurely pilots (the ones that you describe), in the same "few hours" of invested time, incursions are far more profitable than anything they could be doing in nullsec.
Select groups of few people, such as the ones with wallets full of moon goo isk or the ones with wallets full of botting/RMT isk do not belong in general comparisons like this. |

Poetic Stanziel
Arrakis Technology
686
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:20:00 -
[39] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:In simple terms incursions killed nullsec ... I wrote about this in November.
The STAIN Travel Bookmark Collection - 451 Bookmarks |

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
151
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:21:00 -
[40] - Quote
Incursions have been around for a year.... It was when super nerf was anonced that plex prices went to the roof..... So... I blame CCP/goons for current plex prices  |
|

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Onictus wrote:Mars Theran wrote:[
You also said 1 Trillion per hour per system. 100 pilots in 1 system running 130 million per hour per pilot is only 13 billion ISK.
If it was 23 Trillion ISK per day per Vaguard System, the economy would be completely fubar. Sorry 100 billion per hour So 23 billion a day per system, sometimes three incursions, so 6 systems at a time.....1.38 trillion per day with three hi-sec incursions running. Which is why plex when from around 290-325 when I started playing to 425-500 now depending on where the spike is.
Huh, GTC was selling for something like 750m/60 day two years ago. Current prices are around 880m/60day. That's 130m increase in two years which includes the introduction of Plex as a traded commodity.
The real isk faucet driving Plex prices isn't incursions. It's null sec PI. All that POS fuel isk that use to get sunk out of the economy through NPC purchases are now going to players. Most high sec residents have one account that they pay real money for. On the other hand guys out in Null are using their new passive income to pay for their accounts. If you're unhappy about Plex prices go complain to "our members make 500m/month doing PI" Goonswarm. That's your problem.
Oh and the current Plex market in Jita runs about 1.2 trillion a day. Just plexes. Just in Jita. 1.38 Trillion a day is a drop in the bucket to the EvE economy. |

Nor Tzestu
Stillwater Intelligence Services
40
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
So incursions killed null sec? lol. Guess what. The asshats that run null sec killed null sec. Did you think keeping all the tech moons and the ******** isk faucet they are to a couple "powerblocs" would work well for alliance morale? Did you think constantly shitting on high sec dwellers in forum and in game would make them want to move out there and live with you? Did you think your years of sitting on your asses looking for ways to mess with "bears" when you have plenty of targets the NEXT constelation over would be good PR? Did you think WTFBBQ'n any little group that dare try to find a home out there would add to your activity? Here is an idea. How about you stop pointing fingers as to why no one wants to play this game with you and realize its your fault. You all made it so small groups can't live out there. You kill everything that moves in your general direction. You pretty much **** the place up. And you think it is someone else's fault? Enjoy your trailer park.
You expect me to believe your "true" friends left the game cause some bear you all hate in high sec has the isk to buy a shiny "faction" ship to run missions in? Really? Tell me you have some form of mental handicap. I can't possibly fathom the depths of stupidity it takes to come to that "conclusion". After reading that post I honestly think they left to escape your mongoloid drivel. Do cry more how people you despise and couldn't care less about are ruining the shithole you call a home though. The tears are high comedy. |

Jorn Isu
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:29:00 -
[43] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Deviana Sevidon wrote:One pro tip to the nullbears: Don't compare incursion income to the 23/7 cylce you let your bots run. No incursion pilot is online for that much time and because people don't bot they need a break from time to time, you will also have to factor sleep and a wide number of RL activities into this.
While a select number of 0.0 people are assholes and shamelessly run bots, please do not use them to besmirch the name of everyone in 0.0. The point OP was trying to make is that for leisurely pilots (the ones that you describe), in the same "few hours" of invested time, incursions are far more profitable than anything they could be doing in nullsec. Select groups of few people, such as the ones with wallets full of moon goo isk or the ones with wallets full of botting/RMT isk do not belong in general comparisons like this. I'm new here, so forgive me if I completely misunderstand the situation, but:
This is similar to how cops defend accusations of abuses of power with "I don't do it, none of my friends do it, therefore it doesn't exist!" By willingly coexisting with bots (My understanding is that most major null alliances have "do not report" rules, at least with regards to their own bots, and possibly "do not report" NAPs), you are complicit in the activity.
Also, forgive the dramatic comparison, I'm not trying to equate botting in a game with beating people up because they looked at you funny :)
edit:
Nor Tzestu wrote:So incursions killed null sec? lol. Guess what. The asshats that run null sec killed null sec. Did you think keeping all the tech moons and the ******** isk faucet they are to a couple "powerblocs" would work well for alliance morale? www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIP6EwqMEoE#t=0h0m16s |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
327
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jorn Isu wrote: I'm new here, so forgive me if I completely misunderstand the situation, but:
This is similar to how cops defend accusations of abuses of power with "I don't do it, none of my friends do it, therefore it doesn't exist!" By willingly coexisting with bots (My understanding is that most major null alliances have "do not report" rules, at least with regards to their own bots, and possibly "do not report" NAPs), you are complicit in the activity.
Also, forgive the dramatic comparison, I'm not trying to equate botting in a game with beating people up because they looked at you funny :)
Yeah, I get where you're going, but I have never been part of an alliance with a "do not report" policy. I have even spoken out against those who use those policies (check my post history), as by turning a blind eye to this practice everyone hates and everyone acknowledges is bad for Eve, they are simultaneously padding their own wallets and taking the easy/cowardly way out of the possible diplomatic issues resulting from anti-botting policies.
Still, to say that incursions are okay because people in 0.0 make even more money by botting is unfair. More people run incursions than bot (or so I hope), and plus, incursions are a perfectly okay abuse of unbalanced game mechanics, rather than a breach of EULA that can possible cause banning, like botting. |

Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
78
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 21:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
Onictus wrote:Onictus wrote:Mars Theran wrote:[
You also said 1 Trillion per hour per system. 100 pilots in 1 system running 130 million per hour per pilot is only 13 billion ISK.
If it was 23 Trillion ISK per day per Vaguard System, the economy would be completely fubar. Sorry 100 billion per hour So 23 billion a day per system, sometimes three incursions, so 6 systems at a time.....1.38 trillion per day with three hi-sec incursions running. Which is why plex when from around 290-325 when I started playing to 425-500 now depending on where the spike is.
I understand it is still a lot of ISK for Incursions and potentially game-breaking if something isn't done about it soon. Scaling down the rewards would be nice, and it might not be out of place to have Faction and Concord reduce their response times due to being needed elsewhere. Example: Concord response could take an extra 10 seconds, and Faction Response could drop by 2-3 security levels, meaning that in 0.5-0.6, and possibly even 0.7 systems they would be virtually non-existent.
This has very little to do with PLEX prices however, as I can recall the prices have fluctuated madly since I started playing; though usually not above 500 million ISK for long. Some of that is dependent on ISK being readily available for a short period, as well as PLEX to ISK conversions being used to get ahead in the game increasing supply when it spikes.
Low supply will happen when it's not worth making that conversion, and this will result in an upward trend to prices until it reaches a point where that becomes practical again. That mark is typically around 390-450 million ISK. Obviously we've passed that mark recently and stayed up there; but there are also less subscribers now than previously. I think a lot of the subscribers that went, were either the result of a poor economy, or a combined result of that and bittervets who subbed with PLEX off the market and/or supplied it.
Only CCP knows for sure. I know I don't convert PLEX, even at these rates, because I just can't afford it. There was a time when I did, to help pay for expansion of my old Corp. Not anymore. I got 37 hours over the last 2 weeks, and have to pay rent at about 95% of that cheque. Frankly, I coudn't if I wanted to, and even if it was at or around a Billion ISK per PLEX wouldn't. Also, I don't have anything to support but myself now, and that Corp was surviving quite well and independent of any sort of ISK injections last I saw. |

Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
6416
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:02:00 -
[46] - Quote
Skydell wrote:Jenny Cameron wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops. I thought EVE was about having fun, not making ISK? Feel free to have fun being broke in New Eden. I am a multi-billionaire and have been for a while now, and I've around 65 million skill points on this character alone. My primary joy in EVE is flying Rifters that are free for me to take from the corp hangar and lose as often as I want. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |

Vallek Arkonnis
Viziam Amarr Empire
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:02:00 -
[47] - Quote
B DeLeon wrote:That's where the problem is. In 0.0 with a t1 bs you can get ~30-40mill/hour by ratting or running anomalies. With a pimp ship you can get 40-100 mill/hour. Similar reward but so much higher risk. There are the sov bills, upgrade costs, fuel costs (to resupply assets) and you have to deal with roaming gangs/afk cloakers etc and you have to participate in huge fights all the time to defend the territory wich is fun and the main reason why people lives in null but they spend the money what they earn one way or another.
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
Alternatively, you can get a fleet of friends together to remove the long waiting time. But at that point, why not go out and do nullsec Incursions as the risk has been lowered due to simply having a fleet?
Quote:In the meantime norisk highsec incursion runners are grinding out insane amount of money srcewing up the plex prices forcing all the EvE players who aren't participating in incursion grindfleets to grind more for their gametime.
Boo-hoo? Sounds a lot like you want CCP to alter game mechanics so your favorite EVE activity pays for your sub. Is the guy who ships spins all day entitled to a free sub too?
Why shouldn't group PvE be more profitable than solo PvE? Nothing is stopping the former nullbears from doing nullsec Incursions; the deterrence is the risk created by players themselves, not an imbalance of game mechanics. And asking CCP to alter balance because nullsec incursions runners are afraid of getting ganked sounds just like the hisec mission runner asking the same when he gets suicide ganked. Hisec group PvE pays more than hisec solo PvE. The same as nullsec group PvE pays more than nullsec solo PvE.
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
714
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:12:00 -
[48] - Quote
Yeah.. plex is the bane of EVE Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
714
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:18:00 -
[49] - Quote
Also, like bricks have proved recently, its fun to make them squeal. =) Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
236
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
lol wut |
|

Borascus
Hole Diggers
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:21:00 -
[51] - Quote
Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - ~20 billion isk? Only available in Guristas Space? Guristas Space is Null-sec?
Incursion - group of 5-10 people playing together - networking opportunities? - liklihood of a cohesive group forming long-term in-game contacts? liklihood of developing corp relations or merging corps?
The point i'm trying to make is: Null-sec is for excitement, Incursions are for steady isk gain and the likely outcome of making new contacts to ehance the MMO feel.
50/50
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
714
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
lol wut
I thought the same thing, but i thought it to be rude to say it...
Solo null-sec PVE, lol. Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
236
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
lol wut I thought the same thing, but i thought it to be rude to say it... Solo null-sec PVE, lol. just undock my paladin in my npc corp in syndicate and start ratting belts feels good man |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:30:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jorn Isu wrote: This is similar to how cops defend accusations of abuses of power with "I don't do it, none of my friends do it, therefore it doesn't exist!" By willingly coexisting with bots (My understanding is that most major null alliances have "do not report" rules, at least with regards to their own bots, and possibly "do not report" NAPs), you are complicit in the activity.
Also, forgive the dramatic comparison, I'm not trying to equate botting in a game with beating people up because they looked at you funny :)
Hum last time I was out in Null there was no don't shoot the bots rule. The problem was that by the time you loaded grid at the gate the bot was already on its way to safe spot to cloak/logged off. I suppose things could have changed over the last couple of years but the real reason nobody kills bots is that they can't catch them. The only time I remember being told not to shoot a bot was low sec hauler bots around a system we were staging in to invade somebody (think it was -A-). Leadership decided that they didn't want to have to deal with the mercs the botters would hire if we started ganking haulers.
That said, I've also known a bunch of current and former alliance leaders and am pretty sure the leadership of a few alliances that are now long gone were getting $$$ to allow bots. The groups in question pretty much got run out of 0.0.
|

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.22 22:36:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote: Huh, GTC was selling for something like 750m/60 day two years ago. Current prices are around 880m/60day. That's 130m increase in two years which includes the introduction of Plex as a traded commodity.
Sorry not even close to 750 Million. My logs from 2 years ago:
07 Feb 2010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 500,000,000.00 Sold 07 Feb 2010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 500,000,000.00 Sold 22 Jan 2010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 510,000,000.00 Sold 13 Jan 2010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 500,000,000.00 Sold 13 Jan 2010 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 500,000,000.00 Sold 25 Dec 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 510,000,000.00 Sold 25 Dec 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 510,000,000.00 Sold 12 Dec 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 535,000,000.00 Sold 12 Dec 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 540,000,000.00 Sold 27 Nov 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 550,000,000.00 Sold 21 Nov 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 525,000,000.00 Sold 01 Nov 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 550,000,000.00 Sold 07 Oct 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 575,000,000.00 Sold 06 Oct 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 580,000,000.00 Sold 27 Sep 2009 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MY MAIN 530,000,000.00 Sold
|

Vallek Arkonnis
Viziam Amarr Empire
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 05:49:00 -
[56] - Quote
Renan Ruivo wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
lol wut I thought the same thing, but i thought it to be rude to say it... Solo null-sec PVE, lol.
Wow, thought you guys would be smarter than this.
Anomalies = solo Ratting = solo Incursions = fleet
solo content =/= group content
This is an mmo. The rewards for solo play should never be greater than group play. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4505
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 07:34:00 -
[57] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote: The real isk faucet driving Plex prices isn't incursions. It's null sec PI.
GǪexcept that PI is not an ISK faucet. Highsec PI is an ISK sink, though.
Quote:Oh and the current Plex market in Jita runs about 1.2 trillion a day. Just plexes. Just in Jita. 1.38 Trillion a day is a drop in the bucket to the EvE economy. GǪexcept that those trades do not add any ISK (quite the opposite), but rather move it around. A single source adding as much ISK as that large trade item rather shows the opposite: that it is a significant injection of ISK into the economy. In addition, if that number is accurate, it far outpaces all other faucets, which would be even mor worrisome when we consider how few players are needed to generate it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
2887
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 07:46:00 -
[58] - Quote
I say this is pertty shallow argument.
|

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
83
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 07:49:00 -
[59] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Jas Dor wrote: The real isk faucet driving Plex prices isn't incursions. It's null sec PI.
GǪexcept that PI is not an ISK faucet. Highsec PI is an ISK sink, though. Quote:Oh and the current Plex market in Jita runs about 1.2 trillion a day. Just plexes. Just in Jita. 1.38 Trillion a day is a drop in the bucket to the EvE economy. GǪexcept that those trades do not add any ISK (quite the opposite), but rather move it around. A single source adding as much ISK as that large trade item rather shows the opposite: that it is a significant injection of ISK into the economy. In addition, if that number is accurate, it far outpaces all other faucets, which would be even mor worrisome when we consider how few players are needed to generate it.
Assuming you have linked the first starement about incurions who have "fewer players" in the second statement that this is the troubleseome faucet you are making claims about.
Do you have any figures to demonstrate that of all the faucets in the game incurions are the main contributor? Especially when you could consider that bounties globally from the game could be considerably more than incurions.
And have you considered that ISK movement in the market can equally change prices without the aspect of ISK injection into the whole economy.
Please provide sufficient evidence to support these claims.
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
158
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 07:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
Crystal Liche wrote:
Its a GAME, people do what the like, that is all.
Since it's a GAME and people do what they like, they won't have an issue if incursions netted 40M per hour right? |
|

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1312
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 08:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Crystal Liche wrote:
Its a GAME, people do what the like, that is all.
Since it's a GAME and people do what they like, they won't have an issue if incursions netted 40M per hour right?
Unless they like ISK in the wallet for no obvious purpose And dont want to make it via market. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
158
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 08:31:00 -
[62] - Quote
Deviana Sevidon wrote:One pro tip to the nullbears: Don't compare incursion income to the 23/7 cylce you let your bots run. No incursion pilot is online for that much time and because people don't bot they need a break from time to time, you will also have to factor sleep and a wide number of RL activities into this.
Read below, even if that will make you feel clueless.
Jorn Isu wrote: I'm new here, so forgive me if I completely misunderstand the situation, but:
This is similar to how cops defend accusations of abuses of power with "I don't do it, none of my friends do it, therefore it doesn't exist!" By willingly coexisting with bots (My understanding is that most major null alliances have "do not report" rules, at least with regards to their own bots, and possibly "do not report" NAPs), you are complicit in the activity.
Yes you misunderstand the situation.
The PvPers (including in null sec) have completely another mentality compared to the botters. PvPers are active, sometimes reckless guys who like to blow up stuff and then grind a couple anomalies / L4 to make up for the losses, their corps (mine had) ship loss reimbursement programs. They don't like nor need to bot.
Botters are business oriented individuals with strong aversion to anything that makes their business disrupted. They just farm. They are even more "bears" than hi sec bears, their ships have cloaks / insta warps and so on. Unlike PvPers they don't want to boast, they don't want to be under the spotlight, they don't want to blow any ISK, they want to potentially make huge ISK with no loss.
PvPers are those who sweat their ass to earn sov. They boast on the forums and post killboards. Botters are those obscure and secluded renters who you never hear about.
Only the leadership of sov holding alliances (and not the "PvPers", they are really but the grunts) *might* know that botters rented their systems. Most often the leadership don't even want to know, they just take the ISK without investigating.
Finally:
enter incursions, aka a "just farm" activity, with no rent fee to pay no AFK cloakers, no gate campers, no roamers. Vastly higher payoff than bot ratting in 0.0. The PARADISE for RMTers. Just have the Chinese slave multibox incursions (as it seems they do in some of their jails) insted of 0.0 anomalies.
Can you exclude that? Do you REALLY believe that RMTers won't switch to the obvious -risk +reward chicken with golden eggs?
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
158
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 08:32:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Crystal Liche wrote:
Its a GAME, people do what the like, that is all.
Since it's a GAME and people do what they like, they won't have an issue if incursions netted 40M per hour right? Unless they like ISK in the wallet for no obvious purpose  And dont want to make it via market.
Just debunking "THEY DO IT FOR THE GAME" fallacity.
Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
And you are talking out of your ass. The risk involved in solo PvE nullsec is offset by:
- being in a gimped cloaky / ECCM etc. ship, having to GTFO every time a neutral enters a system.
- having a number of corpies camp the gate(s) and WH entrances to the system. Oh wait, that's not really "solo", isn't it?
Also, if you are channel spamming for an incursion fleet you are one of those randoms who don't join "premades" and exactly because you don't want to pour in the socializing effort you seem to imply.
Borascus wrote:Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - ~20 billion isk? Only available in Guristas Space? Guristas Space is Null-sec?
Nope. Estamel inv field equals to ZERO Isk created. It won't make PLEX rise or anything because it does not create any money out of nowhere.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1637
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Andski wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Andski wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Nerf high sec Incursions rewards
PS. Your 0.0 leaders have tech moons i'm sure they won't quit EVE. incursions and tech are basically competing entities leave incursions unchecked and tech will go up up up because of inflation Then we better start worrying about the main isk faucets then, bounties overall rather than incursions which arent the main contributor by a long shot. And suprise suprise, best bounties are in null sec. source? What is the problem with Nullsec Alliance members that they deny everything, even if it is commonly known to be true. Bounties scale with security level, so don't be a jackass.
the anomaly nerf screwed up 0.0 line member income and caused a lot of inward migration to highsec to run incursions
100m/hour anoms aren't a thing anymore unless you dualbox a carrier and tengu |

Tian Nu
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:04:00 -
[65] - Quote
i wanted to post something but while i was typing i forgot what it was... damn. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1637
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:04:00 -
[66] - Quote
Vallek Arkonnis wrote:Renan Ruivo wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
lol wut I thought the same thing, but i thought it to be rude to say it... Solo null-sec PVE, lol. Wow, thought you guys would be smarter than this. Anomalies = solo Ratting = solo Incursions = fleet solo content =/= group content This is an mmo. The rewards for solo play should never be greater than group play.
that is nonsense
you're comparing solo PvE in nullsec, a risky activity, to group PvE in highsec, a low-risk activity |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1637
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:11:00 -
[67] - Quote
Borascus wrote:Estamel's Modified Invulnerability Field - ~20 billion isk? Only available in Guristas Space? Guristas Space is Null-sec?
you realize that officer spawns are hilariously hard to get (they're not exactly something you look for), and even harder to kill, right? if you find one, you need some hilarious DPS to break their regen, and by the time you kill it (usually with two carriers or an SC) you're not exactly guaranteed to get a 20bn officer mod. |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
221
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 09:28:00 -
[68] - Quote
Read OP left thread dissapointed .
OP clearly mispelled 'Incursions' in his title ( ie it doesn't start with P or end in X ) 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4509
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 12:04:00 -
[69] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote: Do you have any figures to demonstrate that of all the faucets in the game incurions are the main contributor? Especially when you could consider that bounties globally from the game could be considerably more than incurions.
Are you familiar with the conditional statement, often signified by the word "if"?
Anyway, yes. As show in the last QEN, those numbers had not changed much since then (the QEN gave them per months, rather than as a daily slice, but the numbers are roughly the same, or maybe ~5 percent higher, and then the CSM minutes seem to suggest that those numbers have decreased due to the move away from L4s and the sanc nerf). That would put bounties at no more than 950B ISK/day at the moment, which is far below the supposed 1.3T ISK/day from incursions.
Quote:And have you considered that ISK movement in the market can equally change prices without the aspect of ISK injection into the whole economy. Yes, but it's the ISK injection that has to be balanced against the sinks and the production, not the trading. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 12:46:00 -
[70] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote: Do you have any figures to demonstrate that of all the faucets in the game incurions are the main contributor? Especially when you could consider that bounties globally from the game could be considerably more than incurions.
Are you familiar with the conditional statement, often signified by the word "if"? Anyway, yes. As show in the last QEN, those numbers had not changed much since then (the QEN gave them per months, rather than as a daily slice, but the numbers are roughly the same, or maybe ~5 percent higher, and then the CSM minutes seem to suggest that those numbers have decreased due to the move away from L4s and the sanc nerf). That would put bounties at no more than 950B ISK/day at the moment, which is far below the supposed 1.3T ISK/day from incursions.
Please explain where you got the "supposed 1.3T ISk/day from incursions? And the supporting evidence that coroborates this. As obviously from your own figures something must be wrong then as the ISK from incursions as I understand it are bounties?
Unless of course there isn't an accurate an up to date piece of evidence to provide any support to your claims. Heaven forbid.
Quote:Quote:And have you considered that ISK movement in the market can equally change prices without the aspect of ISK injection into the whole economy. Yes, but it's the ISK injection that has to be balanced against the sinks and the production, not the trading.
Yet your argument was about plex price increases. All I'm saying is you have no evidence to suggest that plex price increases are due to inflation and that it is linked soley to incursion activities, as opposed to ISK movements within the economy. Again unsupported speculation.
Yet the recent plex spike co-incided with the crucible expansion and after the power of two promotion. Which seams more of a evidential reason for people buying more plex than one due to incursions where you'd expect to see a gradual increase within the term incurions have been valid for?
Also plex is sold in units of 100k+ / month according to the QEN. So your telling me that its accounted for by all the incursion runners. If there are 5000 of them thats 20 each per month.
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4509
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 12:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Please explain where you got the "supposed 1.3T ISk/day from incursions? Look at the quote you used. Also, look up the meaning of "if".
Quote:Yet your argument was about plex price increases. No. The argument was about ISK injection compared to the trading volume of a high-value commodity. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 13:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Please explain where you got the "supposed 1.3T ISk/day from incursions? Look at the quote you used. Also, look up the meaning of "if". Quote:Yet your argument was about plex price increases. No. The argument was about ISK injection compared to the trading volume of a high-value commodity.
If, but, maybe, semantics, re-define, loose definitions. Should be an e-lawyer.
Yet there isnt any evidence to prove that the ISK isnt simply moving around rather than as a result of faucets. You seem incapable of grasping this simple economic fact. And pressure your sole beleif its all due to faucets. As if you re-read your own thread you were quoting that all the trading value could be as a result of faucets alone.
However with all the speculation you havent really provided us with any real solid argument, So its pointless trying to worry about something that hasnt been proven to exist.
Pointless trying to debate it with you if you can grasp fundamental principles however.
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4512
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 13:37:00 -
[73] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:If, but, maybe, semantics, re-define, loose definitions. Should be an e-lawyer. Maybe if you took your time to actually read what you respond to, these things wouldn't have to be pointed out to you.
Quote:Yet there isnt any evidence to prove that the ISK isnt simply moving around rather than as a result of faucets. Which ISK are you talking about?
I'm talking about the ISK injected by incursions, and there is no evidence needed: the ISK is injected by very definition of injecting ISK. You keep talking about things that have never even been mentioned. If you're going to comment on a post, comment on what's actually said in the post, not on something completely different.
Quote:As if you re-read your own thread you were quoting that all the trading value could be as a result of faucets alone. Oh ffs. Go read it again. This time, actually read it. No-one is saying that. Put down the shrooms and stop hallucinating. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |

Inir Ishtori
Perkone Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 13:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost their alt accounts.
a small fix for more honesty and truth  |

MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
145
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 13:56:00 -
[75] - Quote
Andski wrote:you realize that officer spawns are hilariously hard to get (they're not exactly something you look for), and even harder to kill, right? if you find one, you need some hilarious DPS to break their regen, and by the time you kill it (usually with two carriers or an SC) you're not exactly guaranteed to get a 20bn officer mod.
Say what? What changed? I recall killing officer spawns solo in a battleship.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |

Josephine Sokarad
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 14:26:00 -
[76] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote: they are mad because they have lost true friends.
MMM Yummy tears. |

Jafit McJafitson
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
181
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 14:29:00 -
[77] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote: they are mad because they have lost true friends.
http://soundcloud.com/miah-1-1/old-guard

o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7o7om8m8m8m8m8m8m8mm8m8m8 |

Xpaulusx
Hosti1e Traff1c Control
22
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 16:05:00 -
[78] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends. Interesting perspective, but more like mad because they lost fodder for Blob Warfare. Friends you say? In some cases yes but mostly tempoary acquaintances of convenience. Like Diplomacy, saying nice doggy till you can find a big enough stick.  |

OldMan Gana
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 16:12:00 -
[79] - Quote
Move Incursions to NPC Null. " I spent most of my money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." -George Best-á |

Martyr Theos
The NecroMonger Faith
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 16:40:00 -
[80] - Quote
Jenny Cameron wrote:Wot I Think wrote:Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops. I thought EVE was about having fun, not making ISK?
No, EVE is about making money. Period.
Wake up and smell the coffee>>>
Who is this man? >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bj+¦rg+¦lfur_Thor_Bj+¦rg+¦lfsson
What is his relationship to this company and CCP? >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novator_Partners
What is the connection between Zero RMT Corps, RMT websites, and people connected to the above?
When you have figured this out, ask yourself why you are gambling in a crooked casino.
(Doubt this? How else is it that supercaps are getting supplied to RMT sites without the collusion of Zero Corps? You can't build those things in high sec and you need a ship building array to do it. Do you think these things can be used without Corps knowing it? Logic dictates that some of the Zero Corps are in on this. Logic dictates that CCP knows who is doing it. Logic dictates that the investors are spicing up their rate of return by engaging in RMT, in essence competing in the game itself.)
You guys are playing a rigged game. I'm not the first one to point this out.  |
|

Vallek Arkonnis
Viziam Amarr Empire
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 18:06:00 -
[81] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're comparing apples and oranges; hisec group PvE vs. nullsec solo PvE. The risk involved in nullsec solo PvE is offset by the convenience in that you can go anytime you want. Whereas, if you've tried hisec Incursions, you could be stuck in the channel spamming for a fleet for a small portion of forever. There's good money, sure, but only after you finally get a fleet.
And you are talking out of your ass. The risk involved in solo PvE nullsec is offset by: - being in a gimped cloaky / ECCM etc. ship, having to GTFO every time a neutral enters a system. - having a number of corpies camp the gate(s) and WH entrances to the system. Oh wait, that's not really "solo", isn't it?
You're right, but now you'd have a fleet and could go do nullsec Incursions over anomalies and ratting for even more isk. Neat how that works, huh?
My point still stands; you can do high paying anomalies and ratting solo. Any incursion requires a fleet. Any MMO will favor multiplayer activities over solo activities. From the multitude of Incursion whine threads, it seems that the risk in nullsec seems to change depending on the argument; it's either barren because everyone has left in which case there's little risk, or there are roamers everywhere which make it difficult to do any PvE content, thus negating the complaint that nullsec PvP is barren. Which is it? Nerfing PvE content to move PvEers to nullsec does not create more PvPers.
l33t PvPer: I want to stomp bears Isk Hoarding Carebear: I want to make isk
Carebear makes isk in hisec Incursions
PvPer: CCP should nerf hisec Incursions so carebears move to nullsec where I can stomp them.
PvPer stomps the carebear
Carebear: ow that hurts, I want to make isk.
Carebear moves back to hisec to run lvl 4 missions
PvPer: I want to stomp bears. CCP should nerf hisec missions so they move to nullsec where I can stomp them.
Sound familiar?
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
159
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 18:34:00 -
[82] - Quote
Vallek Arkonnis wrote:
You're right, but now you'd have a fleet and could go do nullsec Incursions over anomalies and ratting for even more isk. Neat how that works, huh?
My point still stands; you can do high paying anomalies and ratting solo. Any incursion requires a fleet. Any MMO will favor multiplayer activities over solo activities.
Flawed premise, it's not how it works.
Alliances don't reimburse ratting / PvE ships therefore you and your 0.0 buddies are on your own wallet.
You won't setup a 3-5B pimp ship for 0.0 (much less find a whole group willing to do the same) because rumors circulate very easily and so do roams thru WHs. You WILL do a couple of incursions and then get cynoed / blobbed / neuted whatever to death.
Heck even just moving a pimp hull and mods from hi sec over there is not a joke. Even just moving over there faction / whatever mods, consummables / drones has 100 times the cost of hi sec.
Therefore the 0.0 seccers settle for T2 + whatever they ratted, fitted T1 ships. Therefore their efficiency is vastly inferior than if they did it in hi sec with pimp ships. Therefore the "on paper" better 0.0 money per hour is not really there. Therefore they JC out / log alts and just do it in hi sec.
Moreover, the risk is always there therefore they really do the incursion in haste and kill the MOM (like it should happen).
In hi sec all you have to do is to go Jita and buy at the best price.
|

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.23 20:08:00 -
[83] - Quote
Wot I Think wrote:Why PLEX?
PLEX is one of those unique commodities that allows froobs to play EVE. Back before the world economy went down in flames, most people subscribed, and applied PLEX to increase wealth. A select amount of no life froobs could exploit local resources in a work to live arrangement. All was good.
Enter Incursions, 2b ISK per pilot per 24 hours if allowed to run unmolested and in highsec that is always allowed. The nullsec froob either quits eve or becomes a subber. Mostly they just quit. Post Incursion Null is a vacuum, if you can avoid the roaming hostiles you can earn 50 to 60m an hour ratting if you get a faction mod or two. But only an idiot would remain. Highsec incursions draw 130m+ an hour with no roaming gangs or dependance on drops.
In simple terms incursions killed nullsec, and forced hundreds of nullsec players to quit EVE. Incursions changed the f population and gameplay of EVE. EVE was a game about the conquest of empires. EVE is now about instanced raids, and who can box the most pilots.
Risk v Reward is now just reward.
NullSec isn't mad about wallet balances, they are mad because they have lost true friends.
NULL SEC tears? Quick let me grab my bucket.... slurp... OK ribbing mode off:
1)Honestly the ISK numbers you quote only a Incursion BOT could make... & Incursion bots are impossible for multiple reasons. 2) PLEX price was inflated for reasons other then Incursions & the numbers really prove it if you look at the supply/demand availability... PLEX price inflated most likely due to speculation/Incarna rage 3) Many your friends did move outta null due to the anon nerf i'm guessing? That was a screw up none of the Incursion runners like myself liked ( made incursions too crowded ) 4)Incursion fleets are fun I'd suggest you try it but with the current butt hurt drama I doubt you'll bew able to find a fleet easily since the BOSS sites are dieing so quikly again |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
944

|
Posted - 2012.01.23 20:13:00 -
[84] - Quote
Please use this thread for constructive feedback on Incursions, thank you.
Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |